From 3dd05ab2619f91f94db4b0de09453019a4064d32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Corallo Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 20:41:53 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] `continue` automatically after `fail_htlc` in receiving an HTLC If we receive an HTLC and are processing it a potential MPP part, we always continue in the per-HTLC loop if we call the `fail_htlc` macro, thus its nice to actually do the `continue` therein rather than at the callsites. --- lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs index 845a922e..a330380a 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs @@ -3276,7 +3276,7 @@ where } } } else { - for forward_info in pending_forwards.drain(..) { + 'next_forwardable_htlc: for forward_info in pending_forwards.drain(..) { match forward_info { HTLCForwardInfo::AddHTLC(PendingAddHTLCInfo { prev_short_channel_id, prev_htlc_id, prev_funding_outpoint, prev_user_channel_id, @@ -3334,6 +3334,7 @@ where HTLCFailReason::reason(0x4000 | 15, htlc_msat_height_data), HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: $payment_hash }, )); + continue 'next_forwardable_htlc; } } let phantom_shared_secret = claimable_htlc.prev_hop.phantom_shared_secret; @@ -3355,7 +3356,6 @@ where let mut claimable_payments = self.claimable_payments.lock().unwrap(); if claimable_payments.pending_claiming_payments.contains_key(&payment_hash) { fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc, payment_hash); - continue } let ref mut claimable_payment = claimable_payments.claimable_payments .entry(payment_hash) @@ -3371,7 +3371,6 @@ where if let OnionPayload::Spontaneous(_) = htlcs[0].onion_payload { log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as we already had an existing keysend HTLC with the same payment hash", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0)); fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc, payment_hash); - continue } } let mut total_value = claimable_htlc.sender_intended_value; @@ -3447,7 +3446,6 @@ where Err(()) => { log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as payment verification failed", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0)); fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc, payment_hash); - continue } }; if let Some(min_final_cltv_expiry_delta) = min_final_cltv_expiry_delta { @@ -3456,7 +3454,6 @@ where log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as its CLTV expiry was too soon (had {}, earliest expected {})", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), cltv_expiry, expected_min_expiry_height); fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc, payment_hash); - continue; } } check_total_value!(payment_data, payment_preimage); @@ -3465,7 +3462,6 @@ where let mut claimable_payments = self.claimable_payments.lock().unwrap(); if claimable_payments.pending_claiming_payments.contains_key(&payment_hash) { fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc, payment_hash); - continue } match claimable_payments.claimable_payments.entry(payment_hash) { hash_map::Entry::Vacant(e) => { @@ -3500,7 +3496,6 @@ where if payment_data.is_none() { log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new keysend HTLC with payment_hash {} because we already have an inbound payment with the same payment hash", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0)); fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc, payment_hash); - continue }; let payment_data = payment_data.unwrap(); if inbound_payment.get().payment_secret != payment_data.payment_secret { -- 2.30.2