From 63adb795f71d74f7ab518978bc2cbea6e7526f1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Corallo Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 00:49:18 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Fix rustc nightly compiler error. This works around a regression in nightly rustc that prevents type inference from working properly. --- lightning/src/ln/router.rs | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/router.rs b/lightning/src/ln/router.rs index bb2ea61a..e99a5f76 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/router.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/router.rs @@ -1564,7 +1564,7 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 200); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (13 << 8) | 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &vec![0b11]); // it should also override our view of their features - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, node3); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 13); @@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 200); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (13 << 8) | 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &vec![0b11]); // it should also override our view of their features - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, node3); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 13); @@ -1680,7 +1680,7 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 200); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (13 << 8) | 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &vec![0b11]); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, node3); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 13); @@ -1751,8 +1751,8 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly } { // Simple test with outbound channel to 4 to test that last_hops and first_hops connect @@ -1775,14 +1775,14 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 0); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (8 << 8) | 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &vec![0b11]); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, node7); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 8); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 100); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly } last_hops[0].fee_base_msat = 1000; @@ -1818,8 +1818,8 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, 10); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly } { // ...but still use 8 for larger payments as 6 has a variable feerate @@ -1860,8 +1860,8 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 2000); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly } { // Test Router serialization/deserialization -- 2.30.2