From 7b499931012f9a8710bdb24ad67ec7f92daade4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: shaavan Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 17:06:18 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] Update Offers Test to Verify BOLT12 Invoice Reply Paths 1. Updated the Offers Test to check the reply paths in BOLT12 Invoices. 2. Changed the `extract_invoice` return type from `Option` to `BlindedMessagePath` since all BOLT12Invoices now have a corresponding reply path by default. --- lightning/src/ln/offers_tests.rs | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/offers_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/offers_tests.rs index 8bbf9a0ad..8e4de107a 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/offers_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/offers_tests.rs @@ -219,12 +219,12 @@ fn extract_invoice_request<'a, 'b, 'c>( } } -fn extract_invoice<'a, 'b, 'c>(node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, message: &OnionMessage) -> (Bolt12Invoice, Option) { +fn extract_invoice<'a, 'b, 'c>(node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, message: &OnionMessage) -> (Bolt12Invoice, BlindedMessagePath) { match node.onion_messenger.peel_onion_message(message) { Ok(PeeledOnion::Receive(message, _, reply_path)) => match message { ParsedOnionMessageContents::Offers(offers_message) => match offers_message { OffersMessage::InvoiceRequest(invoice_request) => panic!("Unexpected invoice_request: {:?}", invoice_request), - OffersMessage::Invoice(invoice) => (invoice, reply_path), + OffersMessage::Invoice(invoice) => (invoice, reply_path.unwrap()), #[cfg(async_payments)] OffersMessage::StaticInvoice(invoice) => panic!("Unexpected static invoice: {:?}", invoice), OffersMessage::InvoiceError(error) => panic!("Unexpected invoice_error: {:?}", error), @@ -580,13 +580,22 @@ fn creates_and_pays_for_offer_using_two_hop_blinded_path() { let onion_message = charlie.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(david_id).unwrap(); david.onion_messenger.handle_onion_message(&charlie_id, &onion_message); - let (invoice, _) = extract_invoice(david, &onion_message); + let (invoice, reply_path) = extract_invoice(david, &onion_message); assert_eq!(invoice.amount_msats(), 10_000_000); assert_ne!(invoice.signing_pubkey(), alice_id); assert!(!invoice.payment_paths().is_empty()); for path in invoice.payment_paths() { assert_eq!(path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(bob_id)); } + // Both Bob and Charlie have an equal number of channels and need to be connected + // to Alice when she's handling the message. Therefore, either Bob or Charlie could + // serve as the introduction node for the reply path back to Alice. + assert!( + matches!( + reply_path.introduction_node(), + &IntroductionNode::NodeId(node_id) if node_id == bob_id || node_id == charlie_id, + ) + ); route_bolt12_payment(david, &[charlie, bob, alice], &invoice); expect_recent_payment!(david, RecentPaymentDetails::Pending, payment_id); @@ -659,7 +668,7 @@ fn creates_and_pays_for_refund_using_two_hop_blinded_path() { let onion_message = charlie.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(david_id).unwrap(); david.onion_messenger.handle_onion_message(&charlie_id, &onion_message); - let (invoice, _) = extract_invoice(david, &onion_message); + let (invoice, reply_path) = extract_invoice(david, &onion_message); assert_eq!(invoice, expected_invoice); assert_eq!(invoice.amount_msats(), 10_000_000); @@ -668,6 +677,8 @@ fn creates_and_pays_for_refund_using_two_hop_blinded_path() { for path in invoice.payment_paths() { assert_eq!(path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(bob_id)); } + assert_eq!(reply_path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(bob_id)); + route_bolt12_payment(david, &[charlie, bob, alice], &invoice); expect_recent_payment!(david, RecentPaymentDetails::Pending, payment_id); @@ -726,13 +737,14 @@ fn creates_and_pays_for_offer_using_one_hop_blinded_path() { let onion_message = alice.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(bob_id).unwrap(); bob.onion_messenger.handle_onion_message(&alice_id, &onion_message); - let (invoice, _) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message); + let (invoice, reply_path) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message); assert_eq!(invoice.amount_msats(), 10_000_000); assert_ne!(invoice.signing_pubkey(), alice_id); assert!(!invoice.payment_paths().is_empty()); for path in invoice.payment_paths() { assert_eq!(path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(alice_id)); } + assert_eq!(reply_path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(alice_id)); route_bolt12_payment(bob, &[alice], &invoice); expect_recent_payment!(bob, RecentPaymentDetails::Pending, payment_id); @@ -779,7 +791,7 @@ fn creates_and_pays_for_refund_using_one_hop_blinded_path() { let onion_message = alice.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(bob_id).unwrap(); bob.onion_messenger.handle_onion_message(&alice_id, &onion_message); - let (invoice, _) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message); + let (invoice, reply_path) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message); assert_eq!(invoice, expected_invoice); assert_eq!(invoice.amount_msats(), 10_000_000); @@ -788,6 +800,7 @@ fn creates_and_pays_for_refund_using_one_hop_blinded_path() { for path in invoice.payment_paths() { assert_eq!(path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(alice_id)); } + assert_eq!(reply_path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(alice_id)); route_bolt12_payment(bob, &[alice], &invoice); expect_recent_payment!(bob, RecentPaymentDetails::Pending, payment_id); @@ -1044,7 +1057,7 @@ fn send_invoice_for_refund_with_distinct_reply_path() { let onion_message = bob.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(alice_id).unwrap(); let (_, reply_path) = extract_invoice(alice, &onion_message); - assert_eq!(reply_path.unwrap().introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(charlie_id)); + assert_eq!(reply_path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(charlie_id)); // Send, extract and verify the second Invoice Request message let onion_message = david.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(bob_id).unwrap(); @@ -1053,7 +1066,7 @@ fn send_invoice_for_refund_with_distinct_reply_path() { let onion_message = bob.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(alice_id).unwrap(); let (_, reply_path) = extract_invoice(alice, &onion_message); - assert_eq!(reply_path.unwrap().introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(nodes[6].node.get_our_node_id())); + assert_eq!(reply_path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(nodes[6].node.get_our_node_id())); } /// Checks that a deferred invoice can be paid asynchronously from an Event::InvoiceReceived. @@ -1190,12 +1203,13 @@ fn creates_offer_with_blinded_path_using_unannounced_introduction_node() { let onion_message = alice.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(bob_id).unwrap(); bob.onion_messenger.handle_onion_message(&alice_id, &onion_message); - let (invoice, _) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message); + let (invoice, reply_path) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message); assert_ne!(invoice.signing_pubkey(), alice_id); assert!(!invoice.payment_paths().is_empty()); for path in invoice.payment_paths() { assert_eq!(path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(bob_id)); } + assert_eq!(reply_path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(bob_id)); route_bolt12_payment(bob, &[alice], &invoice); expect_recent_payment!(bob, RecentPaymentDetails::Pending, payment_id); @@ -1239,7 +1253,7 @@ fn creates_refund_with_blinded_path_using_unannounced_introduction_node() { let onion_message = alice.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(bob_id).unwrap(); - let (invoice, _) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message); + let (invoice, _reply_path) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message); assert_eq!(invoice, expected_invoice); assert_ne!(invoice.signing_pubkey(), alice_id); assert!(!invoice.payment_paths().is_empty()); -- 2.39.5