From a805567683ea3a495122915671fef125fb45264f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Antoine Riard Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 00:52:02 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Test htlc outputs shared tx claim case --- src/ln/channelmanager.rs | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/ln/channelmanager.rs b/src/ln/channelmanager.rs index 489299ee..1b5323c8 100644 --- a/src/ln/channelmanager.rs +++ b/src/ln/channelmanager.rs @@ -2284,7 +2284,7 @@ mod tests { use rand::{thread_rng,Rng}; use std::cell::RefCell; - use std::collections::HashMap; + use std::collections::{BTreeSet, HashMap}; use std::default::Default; use std::rc::Rc; use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex}; @@ -3494,6 +3494,74 @@ mod tests { get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1); } + #[test] + fn claim_htlc_outputs_shared_tx() { + // Node revoked old state, htlcs haven't time out yet, claim them in shared justice tx + let nodes = create_network(2); + + // Create some new channel: + let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1); + + // Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions + send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000); + // node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim both offered/received HTLC outputs on top of commitment tx + let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0; + let _payment_preimage_2 = route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3000000).0; + + // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from node[0] + let revoked_local_txn = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get(&chan_1.2).unwrap().last_local_commitment_txn.clone(); + assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 2); // commitment tx + 1 HTLC-Timeout tx + assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1); + assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid()); + assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input.len(), 1); + assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.txid, revoked_local_txn[0].txid()); + assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), 133); // HTLC-Timeout + + //Revoke the old state + claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1); + + { + let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: Default::default(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 }; + + nodes[0].chain_monitor.block_connected_with_filtering(&Block { header, txdata: vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone()] }, 1); + + nodes[1].chain_monitor.block_connected_with_filtering(&Block { header, txdata: vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone()] }, 1); + let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap(); + assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 4); + + let mut revoked_tx_map = HashMap::new(); + revoked_tx_map.insert(revoked_local_txn[0].txid(), revoked_local_txn[0].clone()); + + assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Claim the revoked output + both revoked HTLC outputs + node_txn[0].verify(&revoked_tx_map).unwrap(); + assert_eq!(node_txn[0], node_txn[3]); // justice tx is duplicated due to block re-scanning + + let mut witness_lens = BTreeSet::new(); + witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len()); + witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[1].witness.last().unwrap().len()); + witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[2].witness.last().unwrap().len()); + assert_eq!(witness_lens.len(), 3); + assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(0).next().unwrap(), 77); // revoked to_local + assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(1).next().unwrap(), 133); // revoked offered HTLC + assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(2).next().unwrap(), 138); // revoked received HTLC + + // Next nodes[1] broadcasts its current local tx state: + assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1); + assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid()); //Spending funding tx unique txouput, tx broadcasted by ChannelManager + + assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input.len(), 1); + let witness_script = node_txn[2].clone().input[0].witness.pop().unwrap(); + assert_eq!(witness_script.len(), 133); //Spending an offered htlc output + assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output.txid, node_txn[1].txid()); + assert_ne!(node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output.txid, node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid); + assert_ne!(node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output.txid, node_txn[0].input[1].previous_output.txid); + } + get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1); + assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0); + assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0); + } + + #[test] fn test_htlc_ignore_latest_remote_commitment() { // Test that HTLC transactions spending the latest remote commitment transaction are simply // ignored if we cannot claim them. This originally tickled an invalid unwrap(). -- 2.30.2