From c70bd1fd558513e72fa03dc16f9556882883046e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jurvis Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 22:50:44 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Keep track of inflight HTLCs across payments MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Added two methods, `process_path_inflight_htlcs` and `remove_path_inflight_htlcs`, that updates that `payment_cache` map with path information that may have failed, succeeded, or have been given up on. Introduced `AccountForInflightHtlcs`, which will wrap our user-provided scorer. We move the `S:Score` type parameterization from the `Router` to `find_route`, so we can use our newly introduced `AccountForInflightHtlcs`. `AccountForInflightHtlcs` keeps track of a map of inflight HTLCs by their short channel id, direction, and give us the value that is being used up. This map will in turn be populated prior to calling `find_route`, where we’ll use `create_inflight_map`, to generate a current map of all inflight HTLCs based on what was stored in `payment_cache`. --- lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs | 533 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs | 4 +- lightning/src/routing/gossip.rs | 2 +- lightning/src/routing/scoring.rs | 2 +- 4 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs index a2bdb887..8854fcbc 100644 --- a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs +++ b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs @@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ //! # } //! # //! # struct FakeRouter {} -//! # impl Router for FakeRouter { -//! # fn find_route( +//! # impl Router for FakeRouter { +//! # fn find_route( //! # &self, payer: &PublicKey, params: &RouteParameters, payment_hash: &PaymentHash, //! # first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, scorer: &S //! # ) -> Result { unimplemented!() } @@ -144,8 +144,10 @@ use crate::prelude::*; use lightning::ln::{PaymentHash, PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret}; use lightning::ln::channelmanager::{ChannelDetails, PaymentId, PaymentSendFailure}; use lightning::ln::msgs::LightningError; -use lightning::routing::scoring::{LockableScore, Score}; +use lightning::routing::gossip::NodeId; +use lightning::routing::scoring::{ChannelUsage, LockableScore, Score}; use lightning::routing::router::{PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, RouteParameters}; +use lightning::util::errors::APIError; use lightning::util::events::{Event, EventHandler}; use lightning::util::logger::Logger; use time_utils::Time; @@ -175,10 +177,9 @@ use time_utils; type ConfiguredTime = time_utils::Eternity; /// (C-not exported) generally all users should use the [`InvoicePayer`] type alias. -pub struct InvoicePayerUsingTime +pub struct InvoicePayerUsingTime where P::Target: Payer, - R: for <'a> Router<<::Target as LockableScore<'a>>::Locked>, S::Target: for <'a> LockableScore<'a>, L::Target: Logger, { @@ -207,6 +208,50 @@ impl PaymentInfo { } } } + +/// Used to store information about all the HTLCs that are inflight across all payment attempts +struct AccountForInFlightHtlcs<'a, S: Score> { + scorer: &'a mut S, + /// Maps a channel's short channel id and its direction to the liquidity used up. + inflight_htlcs: HashMap<(u64, bool), u64>, +} + +#[cfg(c_bindings)] +impl<'a, S:Score> lightning::util::ser::Writeable for AccountForInFlightHtlcs<'a, S> { + fn write(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), std::io::Error> { self.scorer.write(writer) } +} + +impl<'a, S: Score> Score for AccountForInFlightHtlcs<'a, S> { + fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, short_channel_id: u64, source: &NodeId, target: &NodeId, usage: ChannelUsage) -> u64 { + if let Some(used_liqudity) = self.inflight_htlcs.get(&(short_channel_id, source < target)) { + let usage = ChannelUsage { + inflight_htlc_msat: usage.inflight_htlc_msat + used_liqudity, + ..usage + }; + + self.scorer.channel_penalty_msat(short_channel_id, source, target, usage) + } else { + self.scorer.channel_penalty_msat(short_channel_id, source, target, usage) + } + } + + fn payment_path_failed(&mut self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) { + self.scorer.payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id) + } + + fn payment_path_successful(&mut self, path: &[&RouteHop]) { + self.scorer.payment_path_successful(path) + } + + fn probe_failed(&mut self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) { + self.scorer.probe_failed(path, short_channel_id) + } + + fn probe_successful(&mut self, path: &[&RouteHop]) { + self.scorer.probe_successful(path) + } +} + /// Storing minimal payment attempts information required for determining if a outbound payment can /// be retried. #[derive(Clone, Copy)] @@ -267,9 +312,9 @@ pub trait Payer { } /// A trait defining behavior for routing an [`Invoice`] payment. -pub trait Router { +pub trait Router { /// Finds a [`Route`] between `payer` and `payee` for a payment with the given values. - fn find_route( + fn find_route( &self, payer: &PublicKey, route_params: &RouteParameters, payment_hash: &PaymentHash, first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, scorer: &S ) -> Result; @@ -314,10 +359,9 @@ pub enum PaymentError { Sending(PaymentSendFailure), } -impl InvoicePayerUsingTime +impl InvoicePayerUsingTime where P::Target: Payer, - R: for <'a> Router<<::Target as LockableScore<'a>>::Locked>, S::Target: for <'a> LockableScore<'a>, L::Target: Logger, { @@ -440,13 +484,19 @@ where let payer = self.payer.node_id(); let first_hops = self.payer.first_hops(); + let inflight_htlcs = self.create_inflight_map(); let route = self.router.find_route( - &payer, params, &payment_hash, Some(&first_hops.iter().collect::>()), - &self.scorer.lock() + &payer, ¶ms, &payment_hash, Some(&first_hops.iter().collect::>()), + &AccountForInFlightHtlcs { scorer: &mut self.scorer.lock(), inflight_htlcs } ).map_err(|e| PaymentError::Routing(e))?; match send_payment(&route) { - Ok(payment_id) => Ok(payment_id), + Ok(payment_id) => { + for path in route.paths { + self.process_path_inflight_htlcs(payment_hash, path); + } + Ok(payment_id) + }, Err(e) => match e { PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(_) => Err(e), PaymentSendFailure::PathParameterError(_) => Err(e), @@ -461,7 +511,19 @@ where Err(e) } }, - PaymentSendFailure::PartialFailure { failed_paths_retry, payment_id, .. } => { + PaymentSendFailure::PartialFailure { failed_paths_retry, payment_id, results } => { + // If a `PartialFailure` event returns a result that is an `Ok()`, it means that + // part of our payment is retried. When we receive `MonitorUpdateFailed`, it + // means that we are still waiting for our channel monitor update to be completed. + for (result, path) in results.iter().zip(route.paths.into_iter()) { + match result { + Ok(_) | Err(APIError::MonitorUpdateFailed) => { + self.process_path_inflight_htlcs(payment_hash, path); + }, + _ => {}, + } + } + if let Some(retry_data) = failed_paths_retry { // Some paths were sent, even if we failed to send the full MPP value our // recipient may misbehave and claim the funds, at which point we have to @@ -481,6 +543,24 @@ where }.map_err(|e| PaymentError::Sending(e)) } + // Takes in a path to have its information stored in `payment_cache`. This is done for paths + // that are pending retry. + fn process_path_inflight_htlcs(&self, payment_hash: PaymentHash, path: Vec) { + self.payment_cache.lock().unwrap().entry(payment_hash) + .or_insert_with(|| PaymentInfo::new()) + .paths.push(path); + } + + // Find the path we want to remove in `payment_cache`. If it doesn't exist, do nothing. + fn remove_path_inflight_htlcs(&self, payment_hash: PaymentHash, path: &Vec) { + self.payment_cache.lock().unwrap().entry(payment_hash) + .and_modify(|payment_info| { + if let Some(idx) = payment_info.paths.iter().position(|p| p == path) { + payment_info.paths.swap_remove(idx); + } + }); + } + fn retry_payment( &self, payment_id: PaymentId, payment_hash: PaymentHash, params: &RouteParameters ) -> Result<(), ()> { @@ -508,17 +588,25 @@ where let payer = self.payer.node_id(); let first_hops = self.payer.first_hops(); + let inflight_htlcs = self.create_inflight_map(); + let route = self.router.find_route( &payer, ¶ms, &payment_hash, Some(&first_hops.iter().collect::>()), - &self.scorer.lock() + &AccountForInFlightHtlcs { scorer: &mut self.scorer.lock(), inflight_htlcs } ); + if route.is_err() { log_trace!(self.logger, "Failed to find a route for payment {}; not retrying ({:})", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), attempts); return Err(()); } - match self.payer.retry_payment(&route.unwrap(), payment_id) { - Ok(()) => Ok(()), + match self.payer.retry_payment(&route.as_ref().unwrap(), payment_id) { + Ok(()) => { + for path in route.unwrap().paths.into_iter() { + self.process_path_inflight_htlcs(payment_hash, path); + } + Ok(()) + }, Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(_)) | Err(PaymentSendFailure::PathParameterError(_)) => { log_trace!(self.logger, "Failed to retry for payment {} due to bogus route/payment data, not retrying.", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0)); @@ -527,7 +615,19 @@ where Err(PaymentSendFailure::AllFailedRetrySafe(_)) => { self.retry_payment(payment_id, payment_hash, params) }, - Err(PaymentSendFailure::PartialFailure { failed_paths_retry, .. }) => { + Err(PaymentSendFailure::PartialFailure { failed_paths_retry, results, .. }) => { + // If a `PartialFailure` error contains a result that is an `Ok()`, it means that + // part of our payment is retried. When we receive `MonitorUpdateFailed`, it + // means that we are still waiting for our channel monitor update to complete. + for (result, path) in results.iter().zip(route.unwrap().paths.into_iter()) { + match result { + Ok(_) | Err(APIError::MonitorUpdateFailed) => { + self.process_path_inflight_htlcs(payment_hash, path); + }, + _ => {}, + } + } + if let Some(retry) = failed_paths_retry { // Always return Ok for the same reason as noted in pay_internal. let _ = self.retry_payment(payment_id, payment_hash, &retry); @@ -544,6 +644,47 @@ where pub fn remove_cached_payment(&self, payment_hash: &PaymentHash) { self.payment_cache.lock().unwrap().remove(payment_hash); } + + /// Given a [`PaymentHash`], this function looks up inflight path attempts in the payment_cache. + /// Then, it uses the path information inside the cache to construct a HashMap mapping a channel's + /// short channel id and direction to the amount being sent through it. + /// + /// This function should be called whenever we need information about currently used up liquidity + /// across payments. + fn create_inflight_map(&self) -> HashMap<(u64, bool), u64> { + let mut total_inflight_map: HashMap<(u64, bool), u64> = HashMap::new(); + // Make an attempt at finding existing payment information from `payment_cache`. If it + // does not exist, it probably is a fresh payment and we can just return an empty + // HashMap. + for payment_info in self.payment_cache.lock().unwrap().values() { + for path in &payment_info.paths { + if path.is_empty() { break }; + // total_inflight_map needs to be direction-sensitive when keeping track of the HTLC value + // that is held up. However, the `hops` array, which is a path returned by `find_route` in + // the router excludes the payer node. In the following lines, the payer's information is + // hardcoded with an inflight value of 0 so that we can correctly represent the first hop + // in our sliding window of two. + let our_node_id: PublicKey = self.payer.node_id(); + let reversed_hops_with_payer = path.iter().rev().skip(1) + .map(|hop| hop.pubkey) + .chain(core::iter::once(our_node_id)); + let mut cumulative_msat = 0; + + // Taking the reversed vector from above, we zip it with just the reversed hops list to + // work "backwards" of the given path, since the last hop's `fee_msat` actually represents + // the total amount sent. + for (next_hop, prev_hop) in path.iter().rev().zip(reversed_hops_with_payer) { + cumulative_msat += next_hop.fee_msat; + total_inflight_map + .entry((next_hop.short_channel_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop) < NodeId::from_pubkey(&next_hop.pubkey))) + .and_modify(|used_liquidity_msat| *used_liquidity_msat += cumulative_msat) + .or_insert(cumulative_msat); + } + } + } + + total_inflight_map + } } fn expiry_time_from_unix_epoch(invoice: &Invoice) -> Duration { @@ -557,14 +698,23 @@ fn has_expired(route_params: &RouteParameters) -> bool { } else { false } } -impl EventHandler for InvoicePayerUsingTime +impl EventHandler for InvoicePayerUsingTime where P::Target: Payer, - R: for <'a> Router<<::Target as LockableScore<'a>>::Locked>, S::Target: for <'a> LockableScore<'a>, L::Target: Logger, { fn handle_event(&self, event: &Event) { + match event { + Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, path, .. } + | Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { path, payment_hash: Some(payment_hash), .. } + | Event::ProbeSuccessful { payment_hash, path, .. } + | Event::ProbeFailed { payment_hash, path, .. } => { + self.remove_path_inflight_htlcs(*payment_hash, path); + }, + _ => {}, + } + match event { Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_id, payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, path, short_channel_id, retry, .. @@ -633,7 +783,7 @@ mod tests { use lightning::ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, NodeFeatures, InitFeatures}; use lightning::ln::functional_test_utils::*; use lightning::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, ErrorAction, LightningError}; - use lightning::routing::gossip::NodeId; + use lightning::routing::gossip::{EffectiveCapacity, NodeId}; use lightning::routing::router::{PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop}; use lightning::routing::scoring::ChannelUsage; use lightning::util::test_utils::TestLogger; @@ -645,6 +795,7 @@ mod tests { use std::time::{SystemTime, Duration}; use time_utils::tests::SinceEpoch; use DEFAULT_EXPIRY_TIME; + use lightning::util::errors::APIError::{ChannelUnavailable, MonitorUpdateFailed}; fn invoice(payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage) -> Invoice { let payment_hash = Sha256::hash(&payment_preimage.0); @@ -792,8 +943,8 @@ mod tests { let final_value_msat = invoice.amount_milli_satoshis().unwrap(); let payer = TestPayer::new() - .fails_with_partial_failure(retry.clone(), OnAttempt(1)) - .fails_with_partial_failure(retry, OnAttempt(2)) + .fails_with_partial_failure(retry.clone(), OnAttempt(1), None) + .fails_with_partial_failure(retry, OnAttempt(2), None) .expect_send(Amount::ForInvoice(final_value_msat)) .expect_send(Amount::OnRetry(final_value_msat / 2)) .expect_send(Amount::OnRetry(final_value_msat / 2)); @@ -1381,18 +1532,263 @@ mod tests { invoice_payer.handle_event(&event); } + #[test] + fn generates_correct_inflight_map_data() { + let event_handled = core::cell::RefCell::new(false); + let event_handler = |_: &_| { *event_handled.borrow_mut() = true; }; + + let payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([1; 32]); + let invoice = invoice(payment_preimage); + let payment_hash = Some(PaymentHash(invoice.payment_hash().clone().into_inner())); + let final_value_msat = invoice.amount_milli_satoshis().unwrap(); + + let payer = TestPayer::new().expect_send(Amount::ForInvoice(final_value_msat)); + let final_value_msat = invoice.amount_milli_satoshis().unwrap(); + let route = TestRouter::route_for_value(final_value_msat); + let router = TestRouter {}; + let scorer = RefCell::new(TestScorer::new()); + let logger = TestLogger::new(); + let invoice_payer = + InvoicePayer::new(&payer, router, &scorer, &logger, event_handler, Retry::Attempts(0)); + + let payment_id = invoice_payer.pay_invoice(&invoice).unwrap(); + + let inflight_map = invoice_payer.create_inflight_map(); + // First path check + assert_eq!(inflight_map.get(&(0, false)).unwrap().clone(), 94); + assert_eq!(inflight_map.get(&(1, true)).unwrap().clone(), 84); + assert_eq!(inflight_map.get(&(2, false)).unwrap().clone(), 64); + + // Second path check + assert_eq!(inflight_map.get(&(1, false)).unwrap().clone(), 64); + + invoice_payer.handle_event(&Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { + payment_id, payment_hash, path: route.paths[0].clone() + }); + + let inflight_map = invoice_payer.create_inflight_map(); + + assert_eq!(inflight_map.get(&(0, false)), None); + assert_eq!(inflight_map.get(&(1, true)), None); + assert_eq!(inflight_map.get(&(2, false)), None); + + // Second path should still be inflight + assert_eq!(inflight_map.get(&(1, false)).unwrap().clone(), 64) + } + + #[test] + fn considers_inflight_htlcs_between_invoice_payments_when_path_succeeds() { + // First, let's just send a payment through, but only make sure one of the path completes + let event_handled = core::cell::RefCell::new(false); + let event_handler = |_: &_| { *event_handled.borrow_mut() = true; }; + + let payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([1; 32]); + let payment_invoice = invoice(payment_preimage); + let payment_hash = Some(PaymentHash(payment_invoice.payment_hash().clone().into_inner())); + let final_value_msat = payment_invoice.amount_milli_satoshis().unwrap(); + + let payer = TestPayer::new() + .expect_send(Amount::ForInvoice(final_value_msat)) + .expect_send(Amount::ForInvoice(final_value_msat)); + let final_value_msat = payment_invoice.amount_milli_satoshis().unwrap(); + let route = TestRouter::route_for_value(final_value_msat); + let router = TestRouter {}; + let scorer = RefCell::new(TestScorer::new() + // 1st invoice, 1st path + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 10, inflight_htlc_msat: 0, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 20, inflight_htlc_msat: 0, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 64, inflight_htlc_msat: 0, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + // 1st invoice, 2nd path + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 64, inflight_htlc_msat: 0, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + // 2nd invoice, 1st path + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 10, inflight_htlc_msat: 0, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 20, inflight_htlc_msat: 64, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 64, inflight_htlc_msat: 0, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + // 2nd invoice, 2nd path + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 64, inflight_htlc_msat: 64, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + ); + let logger = TestLogger::new(); + let invoice_payer = + InvoicePayer::new(&payer, router, &scorer, &logger, event_handler, Retry::Attempts(0)); + + // Succeed 1st path, leave 2nd path inflight + let payment_id = invoice_payer.pay_invoice(&payment_invoice).unwrap(); + invoice_payer.handle_event(&Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { + payment_id, payment_hash, path: route.paths[0].clone() + }); + + // Let's pay a second invoice that will be using the same path. This should trigger the + // assertions that expect the last 4 ChannelUsage values above where TestScorer is initialized. + // Particularly, the 2nd path of the 1st payment, since it is not yet complete, should still + // have 64 msats inflight for paths considering the channel with scid of 1. + let payment_preimage_2 = PaymentPreimage([2; 32]); + let payment_invoice_2 = invoice(payment_preimage_2); + invoice_payer.pay_invoice(&payment_invoice_2).unwrap(); + } + + #[test] + fn considers_inflight_htlcs_between_retries() { + // First, let's just send a payment through, but only make sure one of the path completes + let event_handled = core::cell::RefCell::new(false); + let event_handler = |_: &_| { *event_handled.borrow_mut() = true; }; + + let payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([1; 32]); + let payment_invoice = invoice(payment_preimage); + let payment_hash = PaymentHash(payment_invoice.payment_hash().clone().into_inner()); + let final_value_msat = payment_invoice.amount_milli_satoshis().unwrap(); + + let payer = TestPayer::new() + .expect_send(Amount::ForInvoice(final_value_msat)) + .expect_send(Amount::OnRetry(final_value_msat / 2)) + .expect_send(Amount::OnRetry(final_value_msat / 2)); + let final_value_msat = payment_invoice.amount_milli_satoshis().unwrap(); + let router = TestRouter {}; + let scorer = RefCell::new(TestScorer::new() + // 1st invoice, 1st path + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 10, inflight_htlc_msat: 0, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 20, inflight_htlc_msat: 0, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 64, inflight_htlc_msat: 0, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + // 1st invoice, 2nd path + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 64, inflight_htlc_msat: 0, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + // Retry 1 + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 10, inflight_htlc_msat: 0, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 20, inflight_htlc_msat: 64, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 32, inflight_htlc_msat: 0, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 32, inflight_htlc_msat: 64, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + // Retry 2 + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 10, inflight_htlc_msat: 0, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 20, inflight_htlc_msat: 96, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 32, inflight_htlc_msat: 0, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + .expect_usage(ChannelUsage { amount_msat: 32, inflight_htlc_msat: 96, effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown } ) + ); + let logger = TestLogger::new(); + let invoice_payer = + InvoicePayer::new(&payer, router, &scorer, &logger, event_handler, Retry::Attempts(2)); + + // Fail 1st path, leave 2nd path inflight + let payment_id = Some(invoice_payer.pay_invoice(&payment_invoice).unwrap()); + invoice_payer.handle_event(&Event::PaymentPathFailed { + payment_id, + payment_hash, + network_update: None, + rejected_by_dest: false, + all_paths_failed: false, + path: TestRouter::path_for_value(final_value_msat), + short_channel_id: None, + retry: Some(TestRouter::retry_for_invoice(&payment_invoice)), + }); + + // Fails again the 1st path of our retry + invoice_payer.handle_event(&Event::PaymentPathFailed { + payment_id, + payment_hash, + network_update: None, + rejected_by_dest: false, + all_paths_failed: false, + path: TestRouter::path_for_value(final_value_msat / 2), + short_channel_id: None, + retry: Some(RouteParameters { + final_value_msat: final_value_msat / 2, + ..TestRouter::retry_for_invoice(&payment_invoice) + }), + }); + } + + #[test] + fn accounts_for_some_inflight_htlcs_sent_during_partial_failure() { + let event_handled = core::cell::RefCell::new(false); + let event_handler = |_: &_| { *event_handled.borrow_mut() = true; }; + + let payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([1; 32]); + let invoice_to_pay = invoice(payment_preimage); + let final_value_msat = invoice_to_pay.amount_milli_satoshis().unwrap(); + + let retry = TestRouter::retry_for_invoice(&invoice_to_pay); + let payer = TestPayer::new() + .fails_with_partial_failure( + retry.clone(), OnAttempt(1), + Some(vec![ + Err(ChannelUnavailable { err: "abc".to_string() }), Err(MonitorUpdateFailed) + ])) + .expect_send(Amount::ForInvoice(final_value_msat)); + + let router = TestRouter {}; + let scorer = RefCell::new(TestScorer::new()); + let logger = TestLogger::new(); + let invoice_payer = + InvoicePayer::new(&payer, router, &scorer, &logger, event_handler, Retry::Attempts(0)); + + invoice_payer.pay_invoice(&invoice_to_pay).unwrap(); + let inflight_map = invoice_payer.create_inflight_map(); + + // Only the second path, which failed with `MonitorUpdateFailed` should be added to our + // inflight map because retries are disabled. + assert_eq!(inflight_map.len(), 1); + } + + #[test] + fn accounts_for_all_inflight_htlcs_sent_during_partial_failure() { + let event_handled = core::cell::RefCell::new(false); + let event_handler = |_: &_| { *event_handled.borrow_mut() = true; }; + + let payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([1; 32]); + let invoice_to_pay = invoice(payment_preimage); + let final_value_msat = invoice_to_pay.amount_milli_satoshis().unwrap(); + + let retry = TestRouter::retry_for_invoice(&invoice_to_pay); + let payer = TestPayer::new() + .fails_with_partial_failure( + retry.clone(), OnAttempt(1), + Some(vec![ + Ok(()), Err(MonitorUpdateFailed) + ])) + .expect_send(Amount::ForInvoice(final_value_msat)); + + let router = TestRouter {}; + let scorer = RefCell::new(TestScorer::new()); + let logger = TestLogger::new(); + let invoice_payer = + InvoicePayer::new(&payer, router, &scorer, &logger, event_handler, Retry::Attempts(0)); + + invoice_payer.pay_invoice(&invoice_to_pay).unwrap(); + let inflight_map = invoice_payer.create_inflight_map(); + + // All paths successful, hence we check of the existence of all 4 hops. + assert_eq!(inflight_map.len(), 4); + } + struct TestRouter; impl TestRouter { fn route_for_value(final_value_msat: u64) -> Route { Route { paths: vec![ - vec![RouteHop { - pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("02eec7245d6b7d2ccb30380bfbe2a3648cd7a942653f5aa340edcea1f283686619").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(), - channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), - node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(), - short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: final_value_msat / 2, cltv_expiry_delta: 144 - }], + vec![ + RouteHop { + pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("02eec7245d6b7d2ccb30380bfbe2a3648cd7a942653f5aa340edcea1f283686619").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(), + channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), + node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(), + short_channel_id: 0, + fee_msat: 10, + cltv_expiry_delta: 0 + }, + RouteHop { + pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("0324653eac434488002cc06bbfb7f10fe18991e35f9fe4302dbea6d2353dc0ab1c").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(), + channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), + node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(), + short_channel_id: 1, + fee_msat: 20, + cltv_expiry_delta: 0 + }, + RouteHop { + pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("027f31ebc5462c1fdce1b737ecff52d37d75dea43ce11c74d25aa297165faa2007").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(), + channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), + node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(), + short_channel_id: 2, + fee_msat: final_value_msat / 2, + cltv_expiry_delta: 0 + }, + ], vec![RouteHop { pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("0324653eac434488002cc06bbfb7f10fe18991e35f9fe4302dbea6d2353dc0ab1c").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(), channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), @@ -1424,11 +1820,24 @@ mod tests { } } - impl Router for TestRouter { - fn find_route( - &self, _payer: &PublicKey, route_params: &RouteParameters, _payment_hash: &PaymentHash, - _first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, _scorer: &S + impl Router for TestRouter { + fn find_route( + &self, payer: &PublicKey, route_params: &RouteParameters, _payment_hash: &PaymentHash, + _first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, scorer: &S ) -> Result { + // Simulate calling the Scorer just as you would in find_route + let route = Self::route_for_value(route_params.final_value_msat); + for path in route.paths { + for hop in path { + let usage = ChannelUsage { + amount_msat: hop.fee_msat, + inflight_htlc_msat: 0, + effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Unknown, + }; + scorer.channel_penalty_msat(hop.short_channel_id, &NodeId::from_pubkey(payer), &NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.pubkey), usage); + } + } + Ok(Route { payment_params: Some(route_params.payment_params.clone()), ..Self::route_for_value(route_params.final_value_msat) }) @@ -1437,8 +1846,8 @@ mod tests { struct FailingRouter; - impl Router for FailingRouter { - fn find_route( + impl Router for FailingRouter { + fn find_route( &self, _payer: &PublicKey, _params: &RouteParameters, _payment_hash: &PaymentHash, _first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, _scorer: &S ) -> Result { @@ -1447,7 +1856,8 @@ mod tests { } struct TestScorer { - expectations: Option>, + event_expectations: Option>, + scorer_expectations: RefCell>>, } #[derive(Debug)] @@ -1459,12 +1869,18 @@ mod tests { impl TestScorer { fn new() -> Self { Self { - expectations: None, + event_expectations: None, + scorer_expectations: RefCell::new(None), } } fn expect(mut self, expectation: TestResult) -> Self { - self.expectations.get_or_insert_with(|| VecDeque::new()).push_back(expectation); + self.event_expectations.get_or_insert_with(|| VecDeque::new()).push_back(expectation); + self + } + + fn expect_usage(self, expectation: ChannelUsage) -> Self { + self.scorer_expectations.borrow_mut().get_or_insert_with(|| VecDeque::new()).push_back(expectation); self } } @@ -1476,11 +1892,22 @@ mod tests { impl Score for TestScorer { fn channel_penalty_msat( - &self, _short_channel_id: u64, _source: &NodeId, _target: &NodeId, _usage: ChannelUsage - ) -> u64 { 0 } + &self, _short_channel_id: u64, _source: &NodeId, _target: &NodeId, usage: ChannelUsage + ) -> u64 { + if let Some(scorer_expectations) = self.scorer_expectations.borrow_mut().as_mut() { + match scorer_expectations.pop_front() { + Some(expectation) => { + assert_eq!(expectation.amount_msat, usage.amount_msat); + assert_eq!(expectation.inflight_htlc_msat, usage.inflight_htlc_msat); + }, + None => {}, + } + } + 0 + } fn payment_path_failed(&mut self, actual_path: &[&RouteHop], actual_short_channel_id: u64) { - if let Some(expectations) = &mut self.expectations { + if let Some(expectations) = &mut self.event_expectations { match expectations.pop_front() { Some(TestResult::PaymentFailure { path, short_channel_id }) => { assert_eq!(actual_path, &path.iter().collect::>()[..]); @@ -1495,7 +1922,7 @@ mod tests { } fn payment_path_successful(&mut self, actual_path: &[&RouteHop]) { - if let Some(expectations) = &mut self.expectations { + if let Some(expectations) = &mut self.event_expectations { match expectations.pop_front() { Some(TestResult::PaymentFailure { path, .. }) => { panic!("Unexpected payment path failure: {:?}", path) @@ -1509,7 +1936,7 @@ mod tests { } fn probe_failed(&mut self, actual_path: &[&RouteHop], _: u64) { - if let Some(expectations) = &mut self.expectations { + if let Some(expectations) = &mut self.event_expectations { match expectations.pop_front() { Some(TestResult::PaymentFailure { path, .. }) => { panic!("Unexpected failed payment path: {:?}", path) @@ -1522,7 +1949,7 @@ mod tests { } } fn probe_successful(&mut self, actual_path: &[&RouteHop]) { - if let Some(expectations) = &mut self.expectations { + if let Some(expectations) = &mut self.event_expectations { match expectations.pop_front() { Some(TestResult::PaymentFailure { path, .. }) => { panic!("Unexpected payment path failure: {:?}", path) @@ -1542,9 +1969,15 @@ mod tests { return; } - if let Some(expectations) = &self.expectations { - if !expectations.is_empty() { - panic!("Unsatisfied scorer expectations: {:?}", expectations); + if let Some(event_expectations) = &self.event_expectations { + if !event_expectations.is_empty() { + panic!("Unsatisfied event expectations: {:?}", event_expectations); + } + } + + if let Some(scorer_expectations) = self.scorer_expectations.borrow().as_ref() { + if !scorer_expectations.is_empty() { + panic!("Unsatisfied scorer expectations: {:?}", scorer_expectations) } } } @@ -1584,9 +2017,9 @@ mod tests { self.fails_with(failure, OnAttempt(attempt)) } - fn fails_with_partial_failure(self, retry: RouteParameters, attempt: OnAttempt) -> Self { + fn fails_with_partial_failure(self, retry: RouteParameters, attempt: OnAttempt, results: Option>>) -> Self { self.fails_with(PaymentSendFailure::PartialFailure { - results: vec![], + results: results.unwrap_or(vec![]), failed_paths_retry: Some(retry), payment_id: PaymentId([1; 32]), }, attempt) @@ -1667,8 +2100,8 @@ mod tests { // *** Full Featured Functional Tests with a Real ChannelManager *** struct ManualRouter(RefCell>>); - impl Router for ManualRouter { - fn find_route( + impl Router for ManualRouter { + fn find_route( &self, _payer: &PublicKey, _params: &RouteParameters, _payment_hash: &PaymentHash, _first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, _scorer: &S ) -> Result { diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs index 9ef2d2c8..72d022ee 100644 --- a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs +++ b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs @@ -455,9 +455,9 @@ impl>, L: Deref> DefaultRouter where L:: } } -impl>, L: Deref, S: Score> Router for DefaultRouter +impl>, L: Deref> Router for DefaultRouter where L::Target: Logger { - fn find_route( + fn find_route( &self, payer: &PublicKey, params: &RouteParameters, _payment_hash: &PaymentHash, first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, scorer: &S ) -> Result { diff --git a/lightning/src/routing/gossip.rs b/lightning/src/routing/gossip.rs index 16060921..637a8c04 100644 --- a/lightning/src/routing/gossip.rs +++ b/lightning/src/routing/gossip.rs @@ -915,7 +915,7 @@ impl<'a> fmt::Debug for DirectedChannelInfoWithUpdate<'a> { /// /// While this may be smaller than the actual channel capacity, amounts greater than /// [`Self::as_msat`] should not be routed through the channel. -#[derive(Clone, Copy)] +#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug)] pub enum EffectiveCapacity { /// The available liquidity in the channel known from being a channel counterparty, and thus a /// direct hop. diff --git a/lightning/src/routing/scoring.rs b/lightning/src/routing/scoring.rs index 6ae339ea..a2492acc 100644 --- a/lightning/src/routing/scoring.rs +++ b/lightning/src/routing/scoring.rs @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ impl<'a, S: Writeable> Writeable for MutexGuard<'a, S> { } /// Proposed use of a channel passed as a parameter to [`Score::channel_penalty_msat`]. -#[derive(Clone, Copy)] +#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug)] pub struct ChannelUsage { /// The amount to send through the channel, denominated in millisatoshis. pub amount_msat: u64, -- 2.30.2