From a9aa3c37fe182dd266e0faebc788e0c9ee724783 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Corallo Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:07:45 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Make chanmon_fail_consistency slightly less aggressive This resolves some crashes that both afl and honggfuzz found. --- fuzz/fuzz_targets/chanmon_fail_consistency.rs | 22 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fuzz/fuzz_targets/chanmon_fail_consistency.rs b/fuzz/fuzz_targets/chanmon_fail_consistency.rs index e4585744..3610b1ca 100644 --- a/fuzz/fuzz_targets/chanmon_fail_consistency.rs +++ b/fuzz/fuzz_targets/chanmon_fail_consistency.rs @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ use secp256k1::Secp256k1; use std::mem; use std::cmp::Ordering; -use std::collections::{HashSet, HashMap}; +use std::collections::{HashSet, hash_map, HashMap}; use std::sync::{Arc,Mutex}; use std::sync::atomic; use std::io::Cursor; @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ impl Writer for VecWriter { } } +static mut IN_RESTORE: bool = false; pub struct TestChannelMonitor { pub simple_monitor: Arc>, pub update_ret: Mutex>, @@ -107,7 +108,18 @@ impl channelmonitor::ManyChannelMonitor for TestChannelMonitor { let mut ser = VecWriter(Vec::new()); monitor.write_for_disk(&mut ser).unwrap(); self.latest_good_update.lock().unwrap().insert(funding_txo, ser.0); - self.latest_update_good.lock().unwrap().insert(funding_txo, true); + match self.latest_update_good.lock().unwrap().entry(funding_txo) { + hash_map::Entry::Vacant(mut e) => { e.insert(true); }, + hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut e) => { + if !e.get() && unsafe { IN_RESTORE } { + // Technically we can't consider an update to be "good" unless we're doing + // it in response to a test_restore_channel_monitor as the channel may + // still be waiting on such a call, so only set us to good if we're in the + // middle of a restore call. + e.insert(true); + } + }, + } self.should_update_manager.store(true, atomic::Ordering::Relaxed); } else { self.latest_update_good.lock().unwrap().insert(funding_txo, false); @@ -619,9 +631,9 @@ pub fn do_test(data: &[u8]) { 0x03 => *monitor_a.update_ret.lock().unwrap() = Ok(()), 0x04 => *monitor_b.update_ret.lock().unwrap() = Ok(()), 0x05 => *monitor_c.update_ret.lock().unwrap() = Ok(()), - 0x06 => nodes[0].test_restore_channel_monitor(), - 0x07 => nodes[1].test_restore_channel_monitor(), - 0x08 => nodes[2].test_restore_channel_monitor(), + 0x06 => { unsafe { IN_RESTORE = true }; nodes[0].test_restore_channel_monitor(); unsafe { IN_RESTORE = false }; }, + 0x07 => { unsafe { IN_RESTORE = true }; nodes[1].test_restore_channel_monitor(); unsafe { IN_RESTORE = false }; }, + 0x08 => { unsafe { IN_RESTORE = true }; nodes[2].test_restore_channel_monitor(); unsafe { IN_RESTORE = false }; }, 0x09 => send_payment!(nodes[0], (&nodes[1], chan_a)), 0x0a => send_payment!(nodes[1], (&nodes[0], chan_a)), 0x0b => send_payment!(nodes[1], (&nodes[2], chan_b)), -- 2.30.2