return f"""if (ip6 == NULL) break;
if (!( {ast.write("((((uint32_t)(ip6->flow_lbl[0] & 0xf)) << 2*8) | (((uint32_t)ip6->flow_lbl[1]) << 1*8) | (uint32_t)ip6->flow_lbl[0])")} )) break;"""
+class RuleAction(Enum):
+ CONDITIONS = 1
+ ACTION = 2
+ LIST = 3
+class RuleNode:
+ def __init__(self, ty, action, inner):
+ self.ty = ty
+ self.action = action
+ self.inner = inner
+ if ty == RuleAction.ACTION:
+ assert inner is None
+ assert type(action) == str
+ elif ty == RuleAction.LIST:
+ assert type(inner) == list
+ assert action is None
+ for item in inner:
+ assert type(item) == RuleNode
+ else:
+ assert ty == RuleAction.CONDITIONS
+ assert type(action) == list
+ assert type(inner) == RuleNode
+
+ def maybe_join(self, neighbor):
+ if self.ty == RuleAction.CONDITIONS and neighbor.ty == RuleAction.CONDITIONS:
+ overlapping_conditions = [x for x in self.action if x in neighbor.action]
+ if len(overlapping_conditions) != 0:
+ us = RuleNode(RuleAction.CONDITIONS, [x for x in self.action if x not in overlapping_conditions], self.inner)
+ them = RuleNode(RuleAction.CONDITIONS, [x for x in neighbor.action if x not in overlapping_conditions], neighbor.inner)
+ self.action = overlapping_conditions
+ if self.inner.ty == RuleAction.LIST and us.action == []:
+ self.inner.inner.append(them)
+ else:
+ self.inner = RuleNode(RuleAction.LIST, None, [us, them])
+ self.inner.flatten()
+ return True
+ return False
+
+ def flatten(self):
+ # LLVM can be pretty bad at optimizing out common subexpressions. Thus, we have to do a
+ # pass here to toptimize out common subexpressions in back-to-back rules.
+ # See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52455
+ assert self.ty == RuleAction.LIST
+ did_update = True
+ while did_update:
+ did_update = False
+ for i in range(0, len(self.inner) - 1):
+ if self.inner[i].maybe_join(self.inner[i + 1]):
+ del self.inner[i + 1]
+ did_update = True
+ break
+
+ def write(self, out, pfx="\t"):
+ if self.ty == RuleAction.CONDITIONS:
+ out.write(pfx + "do {\\\n")
+ for cond in self.action:
+ out.write("\t" + pfx + cond.strip().replace("\n", " \\\n\t" + pfx) + " \\\n")
+ self.inner.write(out, pfx)
+ out.write(pfx + "} while(0);\\\n")
+ elif self.ty == RuleAction.LIST:
+ for item in self.inner:
+ item.write(out, pfx + "\t")
+ else:
+ out.write("\t" + pfx + self.action.strip().replace("\n", " \\\n\t" + pfx) + " \\\n")
with open("rules.h", "w") as out:
parse = argparse.ArgumentParser()
assert False
out.write("#define REQ_8021Q " + args.vlan_tag + "\n")
- rules6 = ""
- rules4 = ""
+ rules6 = []
+ rules4 = []
use_v6_frags = False
stats_rulecnt = 0
ratelimitcnt = 0
t = lastrule.split("{")
if t[0].strip() == "flow4":
proto = 4
- rules4 += "\tdo {\\\n"
elif t[0].strip() == "flow6":
proto = 6
- rules6 += "\tdo {\\\n"
else:
continue
- # LLVM can be pretty bad at optimizing out common subexpressions. Ideally we'd optimize
- # by pulling common subexpressions in back-to-back rules out into a single check, but
- # that's a bunch of work that LLVM really should do for us. Instead, we blindly guess
- # that source-address is the least likely to be a common subexpression and rely on LLVM
- # managing to pull out common subexpressions as long as they're the first check(s). By
- # placing source-address checks last, LLVM should do at least some work for us.
- # See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52455
- last_checks = ""
- def write_rule(r, place_at_end=False):
- global rules4, rules6, last_checks
- if place_at_end:
- last_checks += "\t\t" + r.replace("\n", " \\\n\t\t") + " \\\n"
- elif proto == 6:
- rules6 += "\t\t" + r.replace("\n", " \\\n\t\t") + " \\\n"
- else:
- rules4 += "\t\t" + r.replace("\n", " \\\n\t\t") + " \\\n"
+ conditions = []
+ def write_rule(r):
+ global conditions
+ conditions.append(r + "\n")
rule = t[1].split("}")[0].strip()
for step in rule.split(";"):
else:
offset = None
if step.strip().startswith("src"):
- write_rule(ip_to_rule(proto, nets[0], "saddr", offset), True)
+ write_rule(ip_to_rule(proto, nets[0], "saddr", offset))
else:
write_rule(ip_to_rule(proto, nets[0], "daddr", offset))
elif step.strip().startswith("proto") and proto == 4:
else:
assert False
- if proto == 6:
- rules6 += last_checks
- else:
- rules4 += last_checks
+ actions = ""
+ def write_rule(r):
+ global actions
+ actions += r + "\n"
# Now write the match handling!
first_action = None
if last_action is not None:
write_rule(last_action)
if proto == 6:
- rules6 += "\t} while(0);\\\n"
+ rules6.append(RuleNode(RuleAction.CONDITIONS, conditions, RuleNode(RuleAction.ACTION, actions, None)))
else:
- rules4 += "\t} while(0);\\\n"
+ rules4.append(RuleNode(RuleAction.CONDITIONS, conditions, RuleNode(RuleAction.ACTION, actions, None)))
if stats_action != "":
print(rule)
stats_rulecnt += 1
out.write(f"#define STATS_RULECNT {stats_rulecnt}\n")
if ratelimitcnt != 0:
out.write(f"#define RATE_CNT {ratelimitcnt}\n")
- if rules4 != "":
+
+ # Here we should probably sort the rules according to flowspec's sorting rules. We don't bother
+ # however, because its annoying.
+
+ if len(rules4) != 0:
out.write("#define NEED_V4_PARSE\n")
- out.write("#define RULES4 {\\\n" + rules4 + "}\n")
- if rules6:
+ out.write("#define RULES4 {\\\n")
+ rules4 = RuleNode(RuleAction.LIST, None, rules4)
+ rules4.flatten()
+ rules4.write(out)
+ out.write("}\n")
+
+ if len(rules6) != 0:
out.write("#define NEED_V6_PARSE\n")
- out.write("#define RULES6 {\\\n" + rules6 + "}\n")
+ out.write("#define RULES6 {\\\n")
+ rules6 = RuleNode(RuleAction.LIST, None, rules6)
+ rules6.flatten()
+ rules6.write(out)
+ out.write("}\n")
+
if args.v6frag == "ignore-parse-if-rule":
if use_v6_frags:
out.write("#define PARSE_V6_FRAG PARSE\n")
projects / flowspec-xdp / commitdiff