1 // This file is Copyright its original authors, visible in version control
4 // This file is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE
5 // or http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
6 // <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your option.
7 // You may not use this file except in accordance with one or both of these
10 //! Tests that test standing up a network of ChannelManagers, creating channels, sending
11 //! payments/messages between them, and often checking the resulting ChannelMonitors are able to
12 //! claim outputs on-chain.
15 use crate::chain::{ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, Confirm, Listen, Watch};
16 use crate::chain::chaininterface::LowerBoundedFeeEstimator;
17 use crate::chain::channelmonitor;
18 use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, ANTI_REORG_DELAY};
19 use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
20 use crate::chain::keysinterface::{ChannelSigner, EcdsaChannelSigner, EntropySource};
21 use crate::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PathFailure, PaymentPurpose, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination, PaymentFailureReason};
22 use crate::ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash};
23 use crate::ln::channel::{commitment_tx_base_weight, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC, CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER, FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT};
24 use crate::ln::channelmanager::{self, PaymentId, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, RecipientOnionFields, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, ENABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS, DISABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
25 use crate::ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError};
26 use crate::ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils};
27 use crate::ln::chan_utils::{OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT, htlc_success_tx_weight, htlc_timeout_tx_weight, HTLCOutputInCommitment};
28 use crate::routing::gossip::{NetworkGraph, NetworkUpdate};
29 use crate::routing::router::{Path, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, RouteParameters, find_route, get_route};
30 use crate::ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, NodeFeatures};
32 use crate::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, RoutingMessageHandler, ErrorAction};
33 use crate::util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingSigner;
34 use crate::util::test_utils;
35 use crate::util::errors::APIError;
36 use crate::util::ser::{Writeable, ReadableArgs};
37 use crate::util::string::UntrustedString;
38 use crate::util::config::UserConfig;
40 use bitcoin::hash_types::BlockHash;
41 use bitcoin::blockdata::block::{Block, BlockHeader};
42 use bitcoin::blockdata::script::{Builder, Script};
43 use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes;
44 use bitcoin::blockdata::constants::genesis_block;
45 use bitcoin::network::constants::Network;
46 use bitcoin::{PackedLockTime, Sequence, Transaction, TxIn, TxMerkleNode, TxOut, Witness};
47 use bitcoin::OutPoint as BitcoinOutPoint;
49 use bitcoin::secp256k1::Secp256k1;
50 use bitcoin::secp256k1::{PublicKey,SecretKey};
55 use crate::prelude::*;
56 use alloc::collections::BTreeSet;
57 use core::default::Default;
58 use core::iter::repeat;
59 use bitcoin::hashes::Hash;
60 use crate::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
62 use crate::ln::functional_test_utils::*;
63 use crate::ln::chan_utils::CommitmentTransaction;
66 fn test_insane_channel_opens() {
67 // Stand up a network of 2 nodes
68 use crate::ln::channel::TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS;
69 let mut cfg = UserConfig::default();
70 cfg.channel_handshake_limits.max_funding_satoshis = TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS + 1;
71 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
72 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
73 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(cfg)]);
74 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
76 // Instantiate channel parameters where we push the maximum msats given our
78 let channel_value_sat = 31337; // same as funding satoshis
79 let channel_reserve_satoshis = Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(channel_value_sat, &cfg);
80 let push_msat = (channel_value_sat - channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000;
82 // Have node0 initiate a channel to node1 with aforementioned parameters
83 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_sat, push_msat, 42, None).unwrap();
85 // Extract the channel open message from node0 to node1
86 let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
88 // Test helper that asserts we get the correct error string given a mutator
89 // that supposedly makes the channel open message insane
90 let insane_open_helper = |expected_error_str: &str, message_mutator: fn(msgs::OpenChannel) -> msgs::OpenChannel| {
91 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &message_mutator(open_channel_message.clone()));
92 let msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
93 assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
94 let expected_regex = regex::Regex::new(expected_error_str).unwrap();
95 if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref action, .. } = msg_events[0] {
97 &ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. } => {
98 nodes[1].logger.assert_log_regex("lightning::ln::channelmanager", expected_regex, 1);
100 _ => panic!("unexpected event!"),
102 } else { assert!(false); }
105 use crate::ln::channelmanager::MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT;
107 // Test all mutations that would make the channel open message insane
108 insane_open_helper(format!("Per our config, funding must be at most {}. It was {}", TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS + 1, TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS + 2).as_str(), |mut msg| { msg.funding_satoshis = TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS + 2; msg });
109 insane_open_helper(format!("Funding must be smaller than the total bitcoin supply. It was {}", TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS).as_str(), |mut msg| { msg.funding_satoshis = TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS; msg });
111 insane_open_helper("Bogus channel_reserve_satoshis", |mut msg| { msg.channel_reserve_satoshis = msg.funding_satoshis + 1; msg });
113 insane_open_helper(r"push_msat \d+ was larger than channel amount minus reserve \(\d+\)", |mut msg| { msg.push_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000 + 1; msg });
115 insane_open_helper("Peer never wants payout outputs?", |mut msg| { msg.dust_limit_satoshis = msg.funding_satoshis + 1 ; msg });
117 insane_open_helper(r"Minimum htlc value \(\d+\) was larger than full channel value \(\d+\)", |mut msg| { msg.htlc_minimum_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000; msg });
119 insane_open_helper("They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period", |mut msg| { msg.to_self_delay = MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT + 1; msg });
121 insane_open_helper("0 max_accepted_htlcs makes for a useless channel", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 0; msg });
123 insane_open_helper("max_accepted_htlcs was 484. It must not be larger than 483", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 484; msg });
127 fn test_funding_exceeds_no_wumbo_limit() {
128 // Test that if a peer does not support wumbo channels, we'll refuse to open a wumbo channel to
130 use crate::ln::channel::MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO;
131 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
132 let mut node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
133 *node_cfgs[1].override_init_features.borrow_mut() = Some(channelmanager::provided_init_features(&test_default_channel_config()).clear_wumbo());
134 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
135 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
137 match nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO + 1, 0, 42, None) {
138 Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => {
139 assert_eq!(format!("funding_value must not exceed {}, it was {}", MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO, MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO + 1), err);
145 fn do_test_counterparty_no_reserve(send_from_initiator: bool) {
146 // A peer providing a channel_reserve_satoshis of 0 (or less than our dust limit) is insecure,
147 // but only for them. Because some LSPs do it with some level of trust of the clients (for a
148 // substantial UX improvement), we explicitly allow it. Because it's unlikely to happen often
149 // in normal testing, we test it explicitly here.
150 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
151 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
152 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
153 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
154 let default_config = UserConfig::default();
156 // Have node0 initiate a channel to node1 with aforementioned parameters
157 let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
158 let feerate_per_kw = 253;
159 let opt_anchors = false;
160 push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 4 * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000 * 1000;
161 push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
163 let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, if send_from_initiator { 0 } else { push_amt }, 42, None).unwrap();
164 let mut open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
165 if !send_from_initiator {
166 open_channel_message.channel_reserve_satoshis = 0;
167 open_channel_message.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 100_000_000;
169 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
171 // Extract the channel accept message from node1 to node0
172 let mut accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
173 if send_from_initiator {
174 accept_channel_message.channel_reserve_satoshis = 0;
175 accept_channel_message.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 100_000_000;
177 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel_message);
179 let sender_node = if send_from_initiator { &nodes[1] } else { &nodes[0] };
180 let counterparty_node = if send_from_initiator { &nodes[0] } else { &nodes[1] };
181 let mut sender_node_per_peer_lock;
182 let mut sender_node_peer_state_lock;
183 let mut chan = get_channel_ref!(sender_node, counterparty_node, sender_node_per_peer_lock, sender_node_peer_state_lock, temp_channel_id);
184 chan.holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis = 0;
185 chan.holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 100_000_000;
188 let funding_tx = sign_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 100_000, temp_channel_id);
189 let funding_msgs = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_tx);
190 create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_msgs.0);
192 // nodes[0] should now be able to send the full balance to nodes[1], violating nodes[1]'s
193 // security model if it ever tries to send funds back to nodes[0] (but that's not our problem).
194 if send_from_initiator {
195 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100_000_000
196 // Note that for outbound channels we have to consider the commitment tx fee and the
197 // "fee spike buffer", which is currently a multiple of the total commitment tx fee as
198 // well as an additional HTLC.
199 - FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE * commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, 2, opt_anchors));
201 send_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], push_amt);
206 fn test_counterparty_no_reserve() {
207 do_test_counterparty_no_reserve(true);
208 do_test_counterparty_no_reserve(false);
212 fn test_async_inbound_update_fee() {
213 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
214 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
215 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
216 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
217 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
220 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
224 // send (1) commitment_signed -.
225 // <- update_add_htlc/commitment_signed
226 // send (2) RAA (awaiting remote revoke) -.
227 // (1) commitment_signed is delivered ->
228 // .- send (3) RAA (awaiting remote revoke)
229 // (2) RAA is delivered ->
230 // .- send (4) commitment_signed
231 // <- (3) RAA is delivered
232 // send (5) commitment_signed -.
233 // <- (4) commitment_signed is delivered
235 // (5) commitment_signed is delivered ->
237 // (6) RAA is delivered ->
239 // First nodes[0] generates an update_fee
241 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
244 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
245 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
247 let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
248 assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
249 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] { // (1)
250 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
251 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
253 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
256 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
258 // ...but before it's delivered, nodes[1] starts to send a payment back to nodes[0]...
259 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 40000);
260 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
261 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
262 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
264 let payment_event = {
265 let mut events_1 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
266 assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 1);
267 SendEvent::from_event(events_1.remove(0))
269 assert_eq!(payment_event.node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
270 assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
272 // ...now when the messages get delivered everyone should be happy
273 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
274 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg); // (2)
275 let as_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
276 // nodes[0] is awaiting nodes[1] revoke_and_ack so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
277 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
279 // deliver(1), generate (3):
280 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
281 let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
282 // nodes[1] is awaiting nodes[0] revoke_and_ack so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
283 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
285 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack); // deliver (2)
286 let bs_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
287 assert!(bs_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty()); // (4)
288 assert!(bs_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty()); // (4)
289 assert!(bs_update.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty()); // (4)
290 assert!(bs_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty()); // (4)
291 assert!(bs_update.update_fee.is_none()); // (4)
292 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
294 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack); // deliver (3)
295 let as_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
296 assert!(as_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty()); // (5)
297 assert!(as_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty()); // (5)
298 assert!(as_update.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty()); // (5)
299 assert!(as_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty()); // (5)
300 assert!(as_update.update_fee.is_none()); // (5)
301 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
303 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_update.commitment_signed); // deliver (4)
304 let as_second_revoke = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
305 // only (6) so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
306 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
308 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_update.commitment_signed); // deliver (5)
309 let bs_second_revoke = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
310 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
312 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_revoke);
313 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
315 let events_2 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
316 assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
318 Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable {..} => {}, // If we actually processed we'd receive the payment
319 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
322 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_second_revoke); // deliver (6)
323 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
327 fn test_update_fee_unordered_raa() {
328 // Just the intro to the previous test followed by an out-of-order RAA (which caused a
329 // crash in an earlier version of the update_fee patch)
330 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
331 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
332 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
333 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
334 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
337 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
339 // First nodes[0] generates an update_fee
341 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
344 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
345 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
347 let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
348 assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
349 let update_msg = match events_0[0] { // (1)
350 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, .. }, .. } => {
353 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
356 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
358 // ...but before it's delivered, nodes[1] starts to send a payment back to nodes[0]...
359 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 40000);
360 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
361 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
362 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
364 let payment_event = {
365 let mut events_1 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
366 assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 1);
367 SendEvent::from_event(events_1.remove(0))
369 assert_eq!(payment_event.node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
370 assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
372 // ...now when the messages get delivered everyone should be happy
373 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
374 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg); // (2)
375 let as_revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
376 // nodes[0] is awaiting nodes[1] revoke_and_ack so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
377 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
379 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_msg); // deliver (2)
380 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
382 // We can't continue, sadly, because our (1) now has a bogus signature
386 fn test_multi_flight_update_fee() {
387 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
388 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
389 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
390 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
391 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
394 // update_fee/commitment_signed ->
395 // .- send (1) RAA and (2) commitment_signed
396 // update_fee (never committed) ->
398 // We have to manually generate the above update_fee, it is allowed by the protocol but we
399 // don't track which updates correspond to which revoke_and_ack responses so we're in
400 // AwaitingRAA mode and will not generate the update_fee yet.
401 // <- (1) RAA delivered
402 // (3) is generated and send (4) CS -.
403 // Note that A cannot generate (4) prior to (1) being delivered as it otherwise doesn't
404 // know the per_commitment_point to use for it.
405 // <- (2) commitment_signed delivered
407 // B should send no response here
408 // (4) commitment_signed delivered ->
409 // <- RAA/commitment_signed delivered
412 // First nodes[0] generates an update_fee
415 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
416 initial_feerate = *feerate_lock;
417 *feerate_lock = initial_feerate + 20;
419 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
420 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
422 let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
423 assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
424 let (update_msg_1, commitment_signed_1) = match events_0[0] { // (1)
425 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
426 (update_fee.as_ref().unwrap(), commitment_signed)
428 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
431 // Deliver first update_fee/commitment_signed pair, generating (1) and (2):
432 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg_1);
433 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed_1);
434 let (bs_revoke_msg, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
435 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
437 // nodes[0] is awaiting a revoke from nodes[1] before it will create a new commitment
440 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
441 *feerate_lock = initial_feerate + 40;
443 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
444 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
445 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
447 // Create the (3) update_fee message that nodes[0] will generate before it does...
448 let mut update_msg_2 = msgs::UpdateFee {
449 channel_id: update_msg_1.channel_id.clone(),
450 feerate_per_kw: (initial_feerate + 30) as u32,
453 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg_2);
455 update_msg_2.feerate_per_kw = (initial_feerate + 40) as u32;
457 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg_2);
459 // Deliver (1), generating (3) and (4)
460 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_msg);
461 let as_second_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
462 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
463 assert!(as_second_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
464 assert!(as_second_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
465 assert!(as_second_update.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
466 assert!(as_second_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
467 // Check that the update_fee newly generated matches what we delivered:
468 assert_eq!(as_second_update.update_fee.as_ref().unwrap().channel_id, update_msg_2.channel_id);
469 assert_eq!(as_second_update.update_fee.as_ref().unwrap().feerate_per_kw, update_msg_2.feerate_per_kw);
471 // Deliver (2) commitment_signed
472 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed);
473 let as_revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
474 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
475 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
477 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_msg);
478 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
479 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
482 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_second_update.commitment_signed);
483 let (bs_second_revoke, bs_second_commitment) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
484 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
486 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_revoke);
487 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
488 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
490 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_commitment);
491 let as_second_revoke = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
492 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
493 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
495 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_second_revoke);
496 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
497 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
500 fn do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(steps: u8) {
501 // Previously, we had issues deserializing channels when we hadn't connected the first block
502 // after creation. To catch that and similar issues, we lean on the Node::drop impl to test
503 // serialization round-trips and simply do steps towards opening a channel and then drop the
506 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
507 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
508 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
509 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
511 if steps & 0b1000_0000 != 0{
513 header: BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[0].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 },
516 connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
517 connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
520 if steps & 0x0f == 0 { return; }
521 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
522 let open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
524 if steps & 0x0f == 1 { return; }
525 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel);
526 let accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
528 if steps & 0x0f == 2 { return; }
529 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel);
531 let (temporary_channel_id, tx, funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42);
533 if steps & 0x0f == 3 { return; }
534 nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
535 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
536 let funding_created = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
538 if steps & 0x0f == 4 { return; }
539 nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created);
541 let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
542 assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
543 assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
544 added_monitors.clear();
546 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
548 let funding_signed = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
550 if steps & 0x0f == 5 { return; }
551 nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed);
553 let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
554 assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
555 assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
556 added_monitors.clear();
559 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
560 let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
561 assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 0);
563 if steps & 0x0f == 6 { return; }
564 create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm_first(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx, 2);
566 if steps & 0x0f == 7 { return; }
567 confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[0], &tx, 2);
568 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH);
569 create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm_second(&nodes[1], &nodes[0]);
570 expect_channel_ready_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
574 fn test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens() {
575 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(0);
576 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(0 | 0b1000_0000);
577 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(1);
578 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(1 | 0b1000_0000);
579 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(2);
580 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(2 | 0b1000_0000);
581 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(3);
582 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(3 | 0b1000_0000);
583 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(4);
584 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(4 | 0b1000_0000);
585 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(5);
586 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(5 | 0b1000_0000);
587 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(6);
588 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(6 | 0b1000_0000);
589 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(7);
590 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(7 | 0b1000_0000);
591 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(8);
592 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(8 | 0b1000_0000);
596 fn test_update_fee_vanilla() {
597 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
598 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
599 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
600 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
601 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
604 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
607 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
608 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
610 let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
611 assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
612 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] {
613 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id:_, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_add_htlcs:_, update_fulfill_htlcs:_, update_fail_htlcs:_, update_fail_malformed_htlcs:_, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
614 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
616 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
618 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
620 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
621 let (revoke_msg, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
622 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
624 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
625 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
626 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
628 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
629 let revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
630 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
631 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
633 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
634 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
635 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
639 fn test_update_fee_that_funder_cannot_afford() {
640 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
641 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
642 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
643 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
644 let channel_value = 5000;
646 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value, push_sats * 1000);
647 let channel_id = chan.2;
648 let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
649 let default_config = UserConfig::default();
650 let bs_channel_reserve_sats = Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(channel_value, &default_config);
652 let opt_anchors = false;
654 // Calculate the maximum feerate that A can afford. Note that we don't send an update_fee
655 // CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER HTLCs before actually running out of local balance, so we
656 // calculate two different feerates here - the expected local limit as well as the expected
658 let feerate = ((channel_value - bs_channel_reserve_sats - push_sats) * 1000 / (commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER as u64 * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC)) as u32;
659 let non_buffer_feerate = ((channel_value - bs_channel_reserve_sats - push_sats) * 1000 / commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors)) as u32;
661 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
662 *feerate_lock = feerate;
664 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
665 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
666 let update_msg = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
668 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg.update_fee.unwrap());
670 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], update_msg.commitment_signed, false);
672 // Confirm that the new fee based on the last local commitment txn is what we expected based on the feerate set above.
674 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], channel_id)[0].clone();
676 //We made sure neither party's funds are below the dust limit and there are no HTLCs here
677 assert_eq!(commitment_tx.output.len(), 2);
678 let total_fee: u64 = commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 0, opt_anchors) / 1000;
679 let mut actual_fee = commitment_tx.output.iter().fold(0, |acc, output| acc + output.value);
680 actual_fee = channel_value - actual_fee;
681 assert_eq!(total_fee, actual_fee);
685 // Increment the feerate by a small constant, accounting for rounding errors
686 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
689 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
690 nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot afford to send new feerate at {}", feerate + 4), 1);
691 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
693 const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 281474976710654;
695 // Get the EnforcingSigner for each channel, which will be used to (1) get the keys
696 // needed to sign the new commitment tx and (2) sign the new commitment tx.
697 let (local_revocation_basepoint, local_htlc_basepoint, local_funding) = {
698 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
699 let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
700 let local_chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
701 let chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
702 let pubkeys = chan_signer.pubkeys();
703 (pubkeys.revocation_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
704 pubkeys.funding_pubkey)
706 let (remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, remote_htlc_basepoint,remote_point, remote_funding) = {
707 let per_peer_state = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
708 let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
709 let remote_chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
710 let chan_signer = remote_chan.get_signer();
711 let pubkeys = chan_signer.pubkeys();
712 (pubkeys.delayed_payment_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
713 chan_signer.get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1, &secp_ctx),
714 pubkeys.funding_pubkey)
717 // Assemble the set of keys we can use for signatures for our commitment_signed message.
718 let commit_tx_keys = chan_utils::TxCreationKeys::derive_new(&secp_ctx, &remote_point, &remote_delayed_payment_basepoint,
719 &remote_htlc_basepoint, &local_revocation_basepoint, &local_htlc_basepoint);
722 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
723 let local_chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
724 let local_chan = local_chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
725 let local_chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
726 let mut htlcs: Vec<(HTLCOutputInCommitment, ())> = vec![];
727 let commitment_tx = CommitmentTransaction::new_with_auxiliary_htlc_data(
728 INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1,
730 channel_value - push_sats - commit_tx_fee_msat(non_buffer_feerate + 4, 0, opt_anchors) / 1000,
731 opt_anchors, local_funding, remote_funding,
732 commit_tx_keys.clone(),
733 non_buffer_feerate + 4,
735 &local_chan.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable()
737 local_chan_signer.sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, Vec::new(), &secp_ctx).unwrap()
740 let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned {
743 htlc_signatures: res.1,
745 partial_signature_with_nonce: None,
748 let update_fee = msgs::UpdateFee {
750 feerate_per_kw: non_buffer_feerate + 4,
753 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fee);
755 //While producing the commitment_signed response after handling a received update_fee request the
756 //check to see if the funder, who sent the update_fee request, can afford the new fee (funder_balance >= fee+channel_reserve)
757 //Should produce and error.
758 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commit_signed_msg);
759 nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee".to_string(), 1);
760 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
761 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
762 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: String::from("Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee") });
766 fn test_update_fee_with_fundee_update_add_htlc() {
767 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
768 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
769 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
770 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
771 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
774 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
777 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
780 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
781 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
783 let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
784 assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
785 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] {
786 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id:_, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_add_htlcs:_, update_fulfill_htlcs:_, update_fail_htlcs:_, update_fail_malformed_htlcs:_, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
787 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
789 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
791 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
792 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
793 let (revoke_msg, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
794 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
796 let (route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 800000);
798 // nothing happens since node[1] is in AwaitingRemoteRevoke
799 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
800 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
802 let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
803 assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 0);
804 added_monitors.clear();
806 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
807 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
808 // node[1] has nothing to do
810 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
811 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
812 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
814 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
815 let revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
816 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
817 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
818 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
819 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
820 // AwaitingRemoteRevoke ends here
822 let commitment_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
823 assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.len(), 1);
824 assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 0);
825 assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 0);
826 assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 0);
827 assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fee.is_none(), true);
829 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update.update_add_htlcs[0]);
830 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update.commitment_signed);
831 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
832 let (revoke, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
834 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke);
835 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
836 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
838 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
839 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
840 let revoke = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
841 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
843 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke);
844 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
845 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
847 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[0]);
849 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
850 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
852 Event::PaymentClaimable { .. } => { },
853 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
856 claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], our_payment_preimage);
858 send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 800000);
859 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 800000);
860 close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan.2, chan.3, true);
861 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
862 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
866 fn test_update_fee() {
867 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
868 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
869 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
870 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
871 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
872 let channel_id = chan.2;
875 // (1) update_fee/commitment_signed ->
876 // <- (2) revoke_and_ack
877 // .- send (3) commitment_signed
878 // (4) update_fee/commitment_signed ->
879 // .- send (5) revoke_and_ack (no CS as we're awaiting a revoke)
880 // <- (3) commitment_signed delivered
881 // send (6) revoke_and_ack -.
882 // <- (5) deliver revoke_and_ack
883 // (6) deliver revoke_and_ack ->
884 // .- send (7) commitment_signed in response to (4)
885 // <- (7) deliver commitment_signed
888 // Create and deliver (1)...
891 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
892 feerate = *feerate_lock;
893 *feerate_lock = feerate + 20;
895 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
896 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
898 let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
899 assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
900 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] {
901 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id:_, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_add_htlcs:_, update_fulfill_htlcs:_, update_fail_htlcs:_, update_fail_malformed_htlcs:_, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
902 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
904 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
906 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
908 // Generate (2) and (3):
909 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
910 let (revoke_msg, commitment_signed_0) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
911 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
914 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
915 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
916 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
918 // Create and deliver (4)...
920 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
921 *feerate_lock = feerate + 30;
923 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
924 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
925 let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
926 assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
927 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] {
928 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id:_, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_add_htlcs:_, update_fulfill_htlcs:_, update_fail_htlcs:_, update_fail_malformed_htlcs:_, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
929 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
931 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
934 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
935 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
936 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
938 let revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
939 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
941 // Handle (3), creating (6):
942 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed_0);
943 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
944 let revoke_msg_0 = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
945 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
948 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
949 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
950 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
952 // Deliver (6), creating (7):
953 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg_0);
954 let commitment_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
955 assert!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
956 assert!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
957 assert!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
958 assert!(commitment_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
959 assert!(commitment_update.update_fee.is_none());
960 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
963 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update.commitment_signed);
964 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
965 let revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
966 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
968 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
969 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
970 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
972 assert_eq!(get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], channel_id), feerate + 30);
973 assert_eq!(get_feerate!(nodes[1], nodes[0], channel_id), feerate + 30);
974 close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan.2, chan.3, true);
975 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
976 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
980 fn fake_network_test() {
981 // Simple test which builds a network of ChannelManagers, connects them to each other, and
982 // tests that payments get routed and transactions broadcast in semi-reasonable ways.
983 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
984 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
985 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
986 let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
988 // Create some initial channels
989 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
990 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
991 let chan_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
993 // Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels...
994 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
995 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
996 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
997 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
999 // Send some more payments
1000 send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 1000000);
1001 send_payment(&nodes[3], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[1], &nodes[0])[..], 1000000);
1002 send_payment(&nodes[3], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000);
1004 // Test failure packets
1005 let payment_hash_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 1000000).1;
1006 fail_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], payment_hash_1);
1008 // Add a new channel that skips 3
1009 let chan_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3);
1011 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], 1000000);
1012 send_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 1000000);
1013 send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
1014 send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
1015 send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
1016 send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
1017 send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
1019 // Do some rebalance loop payments, simultaneously
1020 let mut hops = Vec::with_capacity(3);
1021 hops.push(RouteHop {
1022 pubkey: nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(),
1023 node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
1024 short_channel_id: chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id,
1025 channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(),
1027 cltv_expiry_delta: chan_3.0.contents.cltv_expiry_delta as u32
1029 hops.push(RouteHop {
1030 pubkey: nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(),
1031 node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
1032 short_channel_id: chan_3.0.contents.short_channel_id,
1033 channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(),
1035 cltv_expiry_delta: chan_4.1.contents.cltv_expiry_delta as u32
1037 hops.push(RouteHop {
1038 pubkey: nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(),
1039 node_features: nodes[1].node.node_features(),
1040 short_channel_id: chan_4.0.contents.short_channel_id,
1041 channel_features: nodes[1].node.channel_features(),
1043 cltv_expiry_delta: TEST_FINAL_CLTV,
1045 hops[1].fee_msat = chan_4.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_4.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[2].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000;
1046 hops[0].fee_msat = chan_3.0.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_3.0.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[1].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000;
1047 let payment_preimage_1 = send_along_route(&nodes[1], Route { paths: vec![Path { hops, blinded_tail: None }], payment_params: None }, &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000).0;
1049 let mut hops = Vec::with_capacity(3);
1050 hops.push(RouteHop {
1051 pubkey: nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(),
1052 node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
1053 short_channel_id: chan_4.0.contents.short_channel_id,
1054 channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(),
1056 cltv_expiry_delta: chan_3.1.contents.cltv_expiry_delta as u32
1058 hops.push(RouteHop {
1059 pubkey: nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(),
1060 node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
1061 short_channel_id: chan_3.0.contents.short_channel_id,
1062 channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(),
1064 cltv_expiry_delta: chan_2.1.contents.cltv_expiry_delta as u32
1066 hops.push(RouteHop {
1067 pubkey: nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(),
1068 node_features: nodes[1].node.node_features(),
1069 short_channel_id: chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id,
1070 channel_features: nodes[1].node.channel_features(),
1072 cltv_expiry_delta: TEST_FINAL_CLTV,
1074 hops[1].fee_msat = chan_2.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_2.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[2].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000;
1075 hops[0].fee_msat = chan_3.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_3.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[1].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000;
1076 let payment_hash_2 = send_along_route(&nodes[1], Route { paths: vec![Path { hops, blinded_tail: None }], payment_params: None }, &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000).1;
1078 // Claim the rebalances...
1079 fail_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], payment_hash_2);
1080 claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
1082 // Close down the channels...
1083 close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan_1.2, chan_1.3, true);
1084 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
1085 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
1086 close_channel(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &chan_2.2, chan_2.3, false);
1087 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
1088 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
1089 close_channel(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &chan_3.2, chan_3.3, true);
1090 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
1091 check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
1092 close_channel(&nodes[1], &nodes[3], &chan_4.2, chan_4.3, false);
1093 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
1094 check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
1098 fn holding_cell_htlc_counting() {
1099 // Tests that HTLCs in the holding cell count towards the pending HTLC limits on outbound HTLCs
1100 // to ensure we don't end up with HTLCs sitting around in our holding cell for several
1101 // commitment dance rounds.
1102 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
1103 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
1104 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
1105 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1106 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
1107 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
1109 let mut payments = Vec::new();
1111 let (route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 100000);
1112 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
1113 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
1114 payments.push((payment_preimage, payment_hash));
1116 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1118 let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1119 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
1120 let initial_payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
1121 assert_eq!(initial_payment_event.node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
1123 // There is now one HTLC in an outbound commitment transaction and (OUR_MAX_HTLCS - 1) HTLCs in
1124 // the holding cell waiting on B's RAA to send. At this point we should not be able to add
1126 let (route, payment_hash_1, _, payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 100000);
1128 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_1,
1129 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_1), PaymentId(payment_hash_1.0)
1130 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
1131 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
1132 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1133 nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs", 1);
1136 // This should also be true if we try to forward a payment.
1137 let (route, payment_hash_2, _, payment_secret_2) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 100000);
1139 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_2,
1140 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_2), PaymentId(payment_hash_2.0)).unwrap();
1141 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1144 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1145 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
1146 let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
1147 assert_eq!(payment_event.node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1149 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
1150 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
1151 // We have to forward pending HTLCs twice - once tries to forward the payment forward (and
1152 // fails), the second will process the resulting failure and fail the HTLC backward.
1153 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
1154 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
1155 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1157 let bs_fail_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
1158 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_fail_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
1159 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], bs_fail_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
1161 expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash_2, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
1163 // Now forward all the pending HTLCs and claim them back
1164 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &initial_payment_event.msgs[0]);
1165 nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &initial_payment_event.commitment_msg);
1166 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
1168 let (bs_revoke_and_ack, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1169 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
1170 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1171 let as_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
1173 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed);
1174 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1175 let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
1177 for ref update in as_updates.update_add_htlcs.iter() {
1178 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), update);
1180 nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.commitment_signed);
1181 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
1182 nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
1183 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
1184 let (bs_revoke_and_ack, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1186 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
1187 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1188 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed);
1189 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1190 let as_final_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
1192 nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_final_raa);
1193 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
1195 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
1197 let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
1198 assert_eq!(events.len(), payments.len());
1199 for (event, &(_, ref hash)) in events.iter().zip(payments.iter()) {
1201 &Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
1202 assert_eq!(*payment_hash, *hash);
1204 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1208 for (preimage, _) in payments.drain(..) {
1209 claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2]], preimage);
1212 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1000000);
1216 fn duplicate_htlc_test() {
1217 // Test that we accept duplicate payment_hash HTLCs across the network and that
1218 // claiming/failing them are all separate and don't affect each other
1219 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(6);
1220 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(6, &chanmon_cfgs);
1221 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(6, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None, None, None]);
1222 let mut nodes = create_network(6, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1224 // Create some initial channels to route via 3 to 4/5 from 0/1/2
1225 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 3);
1226 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3);
1227 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
1228 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 4);
1229 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 5);
1231 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 1000000);
1233 *nodes[0].network_payment_count.borrow_mut() -= 1;
1234 assert_eq!(route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 1000000).0, payment_preimage);
1236 *nodes[0].network_payment_count.borrow_mut() -= 1;
1237 assert_eq!(route_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[5])[..], 1000000).0, payment_preimage);
1239 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], payment_preimage);
1240 fail_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[5])[..], payment_hash);
1241 claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], payment_preimage);
1245 fn test_duplicate_htlc_different_direction_onchain() {
1246 // Test that ChannelMonitor doesn't generate 2 preimage txn
1247 // when we have 2 HTLCs with same preimage that go across a node
1248 // in opposite directions, even with the same payment secret.
1249 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1250 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1251 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1252 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1254 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
1257 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
1259 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 900_000);
1261 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 800_000);
1262 let node_a_payment_secret = nodes[0].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, None, 7200, None).unwrap();
1263 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[0]]], 800_000, payment_hash, node_a_payment_secret);
1265 // Provide preimage to node 0 by claiming payment
1266 nodes[0].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
1267 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, 800_000);
1268 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1270 // Broadcast node 1 commitment txn
1271 let remote_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_1.2);
1273 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output.len(), 4); // 1 local, 1 remote, 1 htlc inbound, 1 htlc outbound
1274 let mut has_both_htlcs = 0; // check htlcs match ones committed
1275 for outp in remote_txn[0].output.iter() {
1276 if outp.value == 800_000 / 1000 {
1277 has_both_htlcs += 1;
1278 } else if outp.value == 900_000 / 1000 {
1279 has_both_htlcs += 1;
1282 assert_eq!(has_both_htlcs, 2);
1284 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &remote_txn[0]);
1285 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1286 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
1287 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
1289 let claim_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
1290 assert_eq!(claim_txn.len(), 3);
1292 check_spends!(claim_txn[0], remote_txn[0]); // Immediate HTLC claim with preimage
1293 check_spends!(claim_txn[1], remote_txn[0]);
1294 check_spends!(claim_txn[2], remote_txn[0]);
1295 let preimage_tx = &claim_txn[0];
1296 let (preimage_bump_tx, timeout_tx) = if claim_txn[1].input[0].previous_output == preimage_tx.input[0].previous_output {
1297 (&claim_txn[1], &claim_txn[2])
1299 (&claim_txn[2], &claim_txn[1])
1302 assert_eq!(preimage_tx.input.len(), 1);
1303 assert_eq!(preimage_bump_tx.input.len(), 1);
1305 assert_eq!(preimage_tx.input.len(), 1);
1306 assert_eq!(preimage_tx.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC 1 <--> 0, preimage tx
1307 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[preimage_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 800);
1309 assert_eq!(timeout_tx.input.len(), 1);
1310 assert_eq!(timeout_tx.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC 0 <--> 1, timeout tx
1311 check_spends!(timeout_tx, remote_txn[0]);
1312 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 900);
1314 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1315 assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
1318 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
1319 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { node_id, action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg } } => {
1320 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1321 assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain.");
1323 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
1324 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
1325 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
1326 assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
1327 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
1328 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
1330 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1336 fn test_basic_channel_reserve() {
1337 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1338 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1339 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1340 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1341 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
1343 let chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
1344 let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
1346 // The 2* and +1 are for the fee spike reserve.
1347 let commit_tx_fee = 2 * commit_tx_fee_msat(get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2), 1 + 1, get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2));
1348 let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - commit_tx_fee;
1349 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_can_send + 1);
1350 let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
1351 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).err().unwrap();
1353 PaymentSendFailure::AllFailedResendSafe(ref fails) => {
1355 &APIError::ChannelUnavailable{ref err} =>
1356 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)),
1357 _ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"),
1360 _ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"),
1362 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1363 nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value", 1);
1365 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1]], max_can_send);
1369 fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() {
1370 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1371 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1372 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1373 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1374 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
1376 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 3460001);
1377 // Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
1378 let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
1379 let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).expect("RNG is bad!");
1381 let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
1383 let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
1384 let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0],
1385 3460001, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
1386 let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash);
1387 let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
1390 amount_msat: htlc_msat,
1391 payment_hash: payment_hash,
1392 cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
1393 onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
1396 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
1398 // Now manually create the commitment_signed message corresponding to the update_add
1399 // nodes[0] just sent. In the code for construction of this message, "local" refers
1400 // to the sender of the message, and "remote" refers to the receiver.
1402 let feerate_per_kw = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
1404 const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = (1 << 48) - 1;
1406 // Get the EnforcingSigner for each channel, which will be used to (1) get the keys
1407 // needed to sign the new commitment tx and (2) sign the new commitment tx.
1408 let (local_revocation_basepoint, local_htlc_basepoint, local_secret, next_local_point, local_funding) = {
1409 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
1410 let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
1411 let local_chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
1412 let chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
1413 // Make the signer believe we validated another commitment, so we can release the secret
1414 chan_signer.get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
1416 let pubkeys = chan_signer.pubkeys();
1417 (pubkeys.revocation_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
1418 chan_signer.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER),
1419 chan_signer.get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2, &secp_ctx),
1420 chan_signer.pubkeys().funding_pubkey)
1422 let (remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, remote_htlc_basepoint, remote_point, remote_funding) = {
1423 let per_peer_state = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
1424 let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
1425 let remote_chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
1426 let chan_signer = remote_chan.get_signer();
1427 let pubkeys = chan_signer.pubkeys();
1428 (pubkeys.delayed_payment_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
1429 chan_signer.get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1, &secp_ctx),
1430 chan_signer.pubkeys().funding_pubkey)
1433 // Assemble the set of keys we can use for signatures for our commitment_signed message.
1434 let commit_tx_keys = chan_utils::TxCreationKeys::derive_new(&secp_ctx, &remote_point, &remote_delayed_payment_basepoint,
1435 &remote_htlc_basepoint, &local_revocation_basepoint, &local_htlc_basepoint);
1437 // Build the remote commitment transaction so we can sign it, and then later use the
1438 // signature for the commitment_signed message.
1439 let local_chan_balance = 1313;
1441 let accepted_htlc_info = chan_utils::HTLCOutputInCommitment {
1443 amount_msat: 3460001,
1444 cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
1446 transaction_output_index: Some(1),
1449 let commitment_number = INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1;
1452 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
1453 let local_chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
1454 let local_chan = local_chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
1455 let local_chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
1456 let commitment_tx = CommitmentTransaction::new_with_auxiliary_htlc_data(
1460 local_chan.opt_anchors(), local_funding, remote_funding,
1461 commit_tx_keys.clone(),
1463 &mut vec![(accepted_htlc_info, ())],
1464 &local_chan.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable()
1466 local_chan_signer.sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, Vec::new(), &secp_ctx).unwrap()
1469 let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned {
1472 htlc_signatures: res.1,
1474 partial_signature_with_nonce: None,
1477 // Send the commitment_signed message to the nodes[1].
1478 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commit_signed_msg);
1479 let _ = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1481 // Send the RAA to nodes[1].
1482 let raa_msg = msgs::RevokeAndACK {
1484 per_commitment_secret: local_secret,
1485 next_per_commitment_point: next_local_point,
1487 next_local_nonce: None,
1489 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa_msg);
1491 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1492 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
1493 // Make sure the HTLC failed in the way we expect.
1495 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fail_htlcs, .. }, .. } => {
1496 assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
1497 update_fail_htlcs[0].clone()
1499 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1501 nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(),
1502 format!("Attempting to fail HTLC due to fee spike buffer violation in channel {}. Rebalancing is required.", ::hex::encode(raa_msg.channel_id)), 1);
1504 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
1508 fn test_chan_reserve_violation_outbound_htlc_inbound_chan() {
1509 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1510 // Set the fee rate for the channel very high, to the point where the fundee
1511 // sending any above-dust amount would result in a channel reserve violation.
1512 // In this test we check that we would be prevented from sending an HTLC in
1514 let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
1515 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1516 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1517 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1518 let default_config = UserConfig::default();
1519 let opt_anchors = false;
1521 let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
1522 push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64, opt_anchors);
1524 push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
1526 let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt);
1528 // Sending exactly enough to hit the reserve amount should be accepted
1529 for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT {
1530 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
1533 // However one more HTLC should be significantly over the reserve amount and fail.
1534 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1_000_000);
1535 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
1536 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
1537 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
1538 assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value"));
1539 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1540 nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value".to_string(), 1);
1544 fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_outbound_channel() {
1545 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1546 let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
1547 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1548 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1549 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1550 let default_config = UserConfig::default();
1551 let opt_anchors = false;
1553 // Set nodes[0]'s balance such that they will consider any above-dust received HTLC to be a
1554 // channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment
1555 // transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)).
1556 let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
1557 push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64, opt_anchors);
1558 push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
1559 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt);
1561 // Send four HTLCs to cover the initial push_msat buffer we're required to include
1562 for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT {
1563 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
1566 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 700_000);
1567 // Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
1568 let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
1569 let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
1570 let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
1571 let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
1572 let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0],
1573 700_000, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
1574 let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash);
1575 let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
1577 htlc_id: MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64,
1578 amount_msat: htlc_msat,
1579 payment_hash: payment_hash,
1580 cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
1581 onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
1584 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
1585 // Check that the payment failed and the channel is closed in response to the malicious UpdateAdd.
1586 nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value".to_string(), 1);
1587 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
1588 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
1589 assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value");
1590 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1591 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value".to_string() });
1595 fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_outbound_chan() {
1596 // Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an outbound channel, they don't count when
1597 // calculating our commitment transaction fee (this was previously broken).
1598 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1599 let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
1601 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1602 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
1603 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1604 let default_config = UserConfig::default();
1605 let opt_anchors = false;
1607 // Set nodes[0]'s balance such that they will consider any above-dust received HTLC to be a
1608 // channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment
1609 // transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)).
1610 let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
1611 push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64, opt_anchors);
1612 push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
1613 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, push_amt);
1615 let dust_amt = crate::ln::channel::MIN_CHAN_DUST_LIMIT_SATOSHIS * 1000
1616 + feerate_per_kw as u64 * htlc_success_tx_weight(opt_anchors) / 1000 * 1000 - 1;
1617 // In the previous code, routing this dust payment would cause nodes[0] to perceive a channel
1618 // reserve violation even though it's a dust HTLC and therefore shouldn't count towards the
1619 // commitment transaction fee.
1620 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_amt);
1622 // Send four HTLCs to cover the initial push_msat buffer we're required to include
1623 for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT {
1624 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
1627 // One more than the dust amt should fail, however.
1628 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], dust_amt + 1);
1629 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
1630 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
1631 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
1632 assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value"));
1636 fn test_chan_init_feerate_unaffordability() {
1637 // Test that we will reject channel opens which do not leave enough to pay for any HTLCs due to
1638 // channel reserve and feerate requirements.
1639 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1640 let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
1641 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1642 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1643 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1644 let default_config = UserConfig::default();
1645 let opt_anchors = false;
1647 // Set the push_msat amount such that nodes[0] will not be able to afford to add even a single
1649 let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
1650 push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64, opt_anchors);
1651 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, push_amt + 1, 42, None).unwrap_err(),
1652 APIError::APIMisuseError { err: "Funding amount (356) can't even pay fee for initial commitment transaction fee of 357.".to_string() });
1654 // During open, we don't have a "counterparty channel reserve" to check against, so that
1655 // requirement only comes into play on the open_channel handling side.
1656 push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
1657 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, push_amt, 42, None).unwrap();
1658 let mut open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1659 open_channel_msg.push_msat += 1;
1660 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
1662 let msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1663 assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
1664 match msg_events[0] {
1665 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => {
1666 assert_eq!(msg.data, "Insufficient funding amount for initial reserve");
1668 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1673 fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_inbound_chan() {
1674 // Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an inbound channel, they don't count when
1675 // calculating our counterparty's commitment transaction fee (this was previously broken).
1676 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1677 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1678 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
1679 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1680 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 98000000);
1682 let payment_amt = 46000; // Dust amount
1683 // In the previous code, these first four payments would succeed.
1684 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1685 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1686 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1687 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1689 // Then these next 5 would be interpreted by nodes[1] as violating the fee spike buffer.
1690 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1691 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1692 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1693 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1694 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1696 // And this last payment previously resulted in nodes[1] closing on its inbound-channel
1697 // counterparty, because it counted all the previous dust HTLCs against nodes[0]'s commitment
1698 // transaction fee and therefore perceived this next payment as a channel reserve violation.
1699 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1703 fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_inbound_chan() {
1704 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
1705 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
1706 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
1707 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1708 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
1709 let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 100000, 95000000);
1712 let total_routing_fee_msat = (nodes.len() - 2) as u64 * feemsat;
1713 let chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
1714 let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
1715 let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
1717 // Add a 2* and +1 for the fee spike reserve.
1718 let commit_tx_fee_2_htlc = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 2 + 1, opt_anchors);
1719 let recv_value_1 = (chan_stat.value_to_self_msat - chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat - total_routing_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlc)/2;
1720 let amt_msat_1 = recv_value_1 + total_routing_fee_msat;
1722 // Add a pending HTLC.
1723 let (route_1, our_payment_hash_1, _, our_payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], amt_msat_1);
1724 let payment_event_1 = {
1725 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_1, our_payment_hash_1,
1726 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret_1), PaymentId(our_payment_hash_1.0)).unwrap();
1727 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1729 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1730 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
1731 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
1733 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_1.msgs[0]);
1735 // Attempt to trigger a channel reserve violation --> payment failure.
1736 let commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs = commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 2, opt_anchors);
1737 let recv_value_2 = chan_stat.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat_1 - chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat - total_routing_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs + 1;
1738 let amt_msat_2 = recv_value_2 + total_routing_fee_msat;
1739 let (route_2, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], amt_msat_2);
1741 // Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
1742 let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
1743 let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
1744 let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
1745 let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route_2.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
1746 let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(
1747 &route_2.paths[0], recv_value_2, RecipientOnionFields::spontaneous_empty(), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
1748 let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash_1);
1749 let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
1752 amount_msat: htlc_msat + 1,
1753 payment_hash: our_payment_hash_1,
1754 cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
1755 onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
1758 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
1759 // Check that the payment failed and the channel is closed in response to the malicious UpdateAdd.
1760 nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value".to_string(), 1);
1761 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
1762 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
1763 assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value");
1764 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1765 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value".to_string() });
1769 fn test_inbound_outbound_capacity_is_not_zero() {
1770 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1771 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1772 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1773 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1774 let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
1775 let channels0 = node_chanmgrs[0].list_channels();
1776 let channels1 = node_chanmgrs[1].list_channels();
1777 let default_config = UserConfig::default();
1778 assert_eq!(channels0.len(), 1);
1779 assert_eq!(channels1.len(), 1);
1781 let reserve = Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config);
1782 assert_eq!(channels0[0].inbound_capacity_msat, 95000000 - reserve*1000);
1783 assert_eq!(channels1[0].outbound_capacity_msat, 95000000 - reserve*1000);
1785 assert_eq!(channels0[0].outbound_capacity_msat, 100000 * 1000 - 95000000 - reserve*1000);
1786 assert_eq!(channels1[0].inbound_capacity_msat, 100000 * 1000 - 95000000 - reserve*1000);
1789 fn commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate: u32, num_htlcs: u64, opt_anchors: bool) -> u64 {
1790 (commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + num_htlcs * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) * feerate as u64 / 1000 * 1000
1794 fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() {
1795 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
1796 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
1797 // When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
1798 // It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
1799 let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
1800 config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 239;
1801 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
1802 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1803 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 190000, 1001);
1804 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 190000, 1001);
1806 let mut stat01 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
1807 let mut stat11 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[0], chan_1.2);
1809 let mut stat12 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[2], chan_2.2);
1810 let mut stat22 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[2], nodes[1], chan_2.2);
1812 macro_rules! expect_forward {
1814 let mut events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1815 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
1816 check_added_monitors!($node, 1);
1817 let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0));
1822 let feemsat = 239; // set above
1823 let total_fee_msat = (nodes.len() - 2) as u64 * feemsat;
1824 let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
1825 let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
1827 let recv_value_0 = stat01.counterparty_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat - total_fee_msat;
1829 // attempt to send amt_msat > their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat
1831 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
1832 .with_features(nodes[2].node.invoice_features()).with_max_channel_saturation_power_of_half(0);
1833 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], payment_params, recv_value_0, TEST_FINAL_CLTV);
1834 route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat += 1;
1835 assert!(route.paths[0].hops.iter().rev().skip(1).all(|h| h.fee_msat == feemsat));
1837 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
1838 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
1839 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
1840 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
1841 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1842 nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept", 1);
1845 // channel reserve is bigger than their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat so loop to deplete
1846 // nodes[0]'s wealth
1848 let amt_msat = recv_value_0 + total_fee_msat;
1849 // 3 for the 3 HTLCs that will be sent, 2* and +1 for the fee spike reserve.
1850 // Also, ensure that each payment has enough to be over the dust limit to
1851 // ensure it'll be included in each commit tx fee calculation.
1852 let commit_tx_fee_all_htlcs = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 3 + 1, opt_anchors);
1853 let ensure_htlc_amounts_above_dust_buffer = 3 * (stat01.counterparty_dust_limit_msat + 1000);
1854 if stat01.value_to_self_msat < stat01.channel_reserve_msat + commit_tx_fee_all_htlcs + ensure_htlc_amounts_above_dust_buffer + amt_msat {
1858 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
1859 .with_features(nodes[2].node.invoice_features()).with_max_channel_saturation_power_of_half(0);
1860 let route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, recv_value_0, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
1861 let (payment_preimage, ..) = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], recv_value_0);
1862 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage);
1864 let (stat01_, stat11_, stat12_, stat22_) = (
1865 get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2),
1866 get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[0], chan_1.2),
1867 get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[2], chan_2.2),
1868 get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[2], nodes[1], chan_2.2),
1871 assert_eq!(stat01_.value_to_self_msat, stat01.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat);
1872 assert_eq!(stat11_.value_to_self_msat, stat11.value_to_self_msat + amt_msat);
1873 assert_eq!(stat12_.value_to_self_msat, stat12.value_to_self_msat - (amt_msat - feemsat));
1874 assert_eq!(stat22_.value_to_self_msat, stat22.value_to_self_msat + (amt_msat - feemsat));
1875 stat01 = stat01_; stat11 = stat11_; stat12 = stat12_; stat22 = stat22_;
1878 // adding pending output.
1879 // 2* and +1 HTLCs on the commit tx fee for the fee spike reserve.
1880 // The reason we're dividing by two here is as follows: the dividend is the total outbound liquidity
1881 // after fees, the channel reserve, and the fee spike buffer are removed. We eventually want to
1882 // divide this quantity into 3 portions, that will each be sent in an HTLC. This allows us
1883 // to test channel channel reserve policy at the edges of what amount is sendable, i.e.
1884 // cases where 1 msat over X amount will cause a payment failure, but anything less than
1885 // that can be sent successfully. So, dividing by two is a somewhat arbitrary way of getting
1886 // the amount of the first of these aforementioned 3 payments. The reason we split into 3 payments
1887 // is to test the behavior of the holding cell with respect to channel reserve and commit tx fee
1889 let commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 2 + 1, opt_anchors);
1890 let recv_value_1 = (stat01.value_to_self_msat - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs)/2;
1891 let amt_msat_1 = recv_value_1 + total_fee_msat;
1893 let (route_1, our_payment_hash_1, our_payment_preimage_1, our_payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_1);
1894 let payment_event_1 = {
1895 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_1, our_payment_hash_1,
1896 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret_1), PaymentId(our_payment_hash_1.0)).unwrap();
1897 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1899 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1900 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
1901 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
1903 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_1.msgs[0]);
1905 // channel reserve test with htlc pending output > 0
1906 let recv_value_2 = stat01.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat_1 - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs;
1908 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_2 + 1);
1909 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
1910 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
1911 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
1912 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
1913 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1916 // split the rest to test holding cell
1917 let commit_tx_fee_3_htlcs = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 3 + 1, opt_anchors);
1918 let additional_htlc_cost_msat = commit_tx_fee_3_htlcs - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs;
1919 let recv_value_21 = recv_value_2/2 - additional_htlc_cost_msat/2;
1920 let recv_value_22 = recv_value_2 - recv_value_21 - total_fee_msat - additional_htlc_cost_msat;
1922 let stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
1923 assert_eq!(stat.value_to_self_msat - (stat.pending_outbound_htlcs_amount_msat + recv_value_21 + recv_value_22 + total_fee_msat + total_fee_msat + commit_tx_fee_3_htlcs), stat.channel_reserve_msat);
1926 // now see if they go through on both sides
1927 let (route_21, our_payment_hash_21, our_payment_preimage_21, our_payment_secret_21) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_21);
1928 // but this will stuck in the holding cell
1929 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_21, our_payment_hash_21,
1930 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret_21), PaymentId(our_payment_hash_21.0)).unwrap();
1931 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
1932 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
1933 assert_eq!(events.len(), 0);
1935 // test with outbound holding cell amount > 0
1937 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_22+1);
1938 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
1939 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
1940 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
1941 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
1942 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1943 nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value", 2);
1946 let (route_22, our_payment_hash_22, our_payment_preimage_22, our_payment_secret_22) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_22);
1947 // this will also stuck in the holding cell
1948 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_22, our_payment_hash_22,
1949 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret_22), PaymentId(our_payment_hash_22.0)).unwrap();
1950 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
1951 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
1952 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1954 // flush the pending htlc
1955 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_1.commitment_msg);
1956 let (as_revoke_and_ack, as_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
1957 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1959 // the pending htlc should be promoted to committed
1960 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
1961 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1962 let commitment_update_2 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1964 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_commitment_signed);
1965 let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1966 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
1967 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1969 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
1970 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1971 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1973 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
1975 let ref payment_event_11 = expect_forward!(nodes[1]);
1976 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_11.msgs[0]);
1977 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], payment_event_11.commitment_msg, false);
1979 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
1980 expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[2], our_payment_hash_1, our_payment_secret_1, recv_value_1);
1982 // flush the htlcs in the holding cell
1983 assert_eq!(commitment_update_2.update_add_htlcs.len(), 2);
1984 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update_2.update_add_htlcs[0]);
1985 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update_2.update_add_htlcs[1]);
1986 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], &commitment_update_2.commitment_signed, false);
1987 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
1989 let ref payment_event_3 = expect_forward!(nodes[1]);
1990 assert_eq!(payment_event_3.msgs.len(), 2);
1991 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_3.msgs[0]);
1992 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_3.msgs[1]);
1994 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], &payment_event_3.commitment_msg, false);
1995 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
1997 let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
1998 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
2000 Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, .. } => {
2001 assert_eq!(our_payment_hash_21, *payment_hash);
2002 assert_eq!(recv_value_21, amount_msat);
2003 assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), receiver_node_id.unwrap());
2004 assert_eq!(via_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
2006 PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
2007 assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
2008 assert_eq!(our_payment_secret_21, *payment_secret);
2010 _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
2013 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2016 Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, .. } => {
2017 assert_eq!(our_payment_hash_22, *payment_hash);
2018 assert_eq!(recv_value_22, amount_msat);
2019 assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), receiver_node_id.unwrap());
2020 assert_eq!(via_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
2022 PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
2023 assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
2024 assert_eq!(our_payment_secret_22, *payment_secret);
2026 _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
2029 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2032 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_1);
2033 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_21);
2034 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_22);
2036 let commit_tx_fee_0_htlcs = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1, opt_anchors);
2037 let recv_value_3 = commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs - commit_tx_fee_0_htlcs - total_fee_msat;
2038 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1], &nodes[2]][..], recv_value_3);
2040 let commit_tx_fee_1_htlc = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1, opt_anchors);
2041 let expected_value_to_self = stat01.value_to_self_msat - (recv_value_1 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_21 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_22 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_3 + total_fee_msat);
2042 let stat0 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
2043 assert_eq!(stat0.value_to_self_msat, expected_value_to_self);
2044 assert_eq!(stat0.value_to_self_msat, stat0.channel_reserve_msat + commit_tx_fee_1_htlc);
2046 let stat2 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[2], nodes[1], chan_2.2);
2047 assert_eq!(stat2.value_to_self_msat, stat22.value_to_self_msat + recv_value_1 + recv_value_21 + recv_value_22 + recv_value_3);
2051 fn channel_reserve_in_flight_removes() {
2052 // In cases where one side claims an HTLC, it thinks it has additional available funds that it
2053 // can send to its counterparty, but due to update ordering, the other side may not yet have
2054 // considered those HTLCs fully removed.
2055 // This tests that we don't count HTLCs which will not be included in the next remote
2056 // commitment transaction towards the reserve value (as it implies no commitment transaction
2057 // will be generated which violates the remote reserve value).
2058 // This was broken previously, and discovered by the chanmon_fail_consistency fuzz test.
2060 // * route two HTLCs from A to B (note that, at a high level, this test is checking that, when
2061 // you consider the values of both of these HTLCs, B may not send an HTLC back to A, but if
2062 // you only consider the value of the first HTLC, it may not),
2063 // * start routing a third HTLC from A to B,
2064 // * claim the first two HTLCs (though B will generate an update_fulfill for one, and put
2065 // the other claim in its holding cell, as it immediately goes into AwaitingRAA),
2066 // * deliver the first fulfill from B
2067 // * deliver the update_add and an RAA from A, resulting in B freeing the second holding cell
2069 // * deliver A's response CS and RAA.
2070 // This results in A having the second HTLC in AwaitingRemovedRemoteRevoke, but B having
2071 // removed it fully. B now has the push_msat plus the first two HTLCs in value.
2072 // * Now B happily sends another HTLC, potentially violating its reserve value from A's point
2073 // of view (if A counts the AwaitingRemovedRemoteRevoke HTLC).
2074 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
2075 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
2076 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
2077 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2078 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2080 let b_chan_values = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[0], chan_1.2);
2081 // Route the first two HTLCs.
2082 let payment_value_1 = b_chan_values.channel_reserve_msat - b_chan_values.value_to_self_msat - 10000;
2083 let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_value_1);
2084 let (payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 20_000);
2086 // Start routing the third HTLC (this is just used to get everyone in the right state).
2087 let (route, payment_hash_3, payment_preimage_3, payment_secret_3) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
2089 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_3,
2090 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_3), PaymentId(payment_hash_3.0)).unwrap();
2091 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2092 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
2093 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
2094 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
2097 // Now claim both of the first two HTLCs on B's end, putting B in AwaitingRAA and generating an
2098 // initial fulfill/CS.
2099 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1);
2100 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, payment_value_1);
2101 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2102 let bs_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2104 // This claim goes in B's holding cell, allowing us to have a pending B->A RAA which does not
2105 // remove the second HTLC when we send the HTLC back from B to A.
2106 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_2);
2107 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, 20_000);
2108 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2109 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
2111 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_removes.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
2112 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_removes.commitment_signed);
2113 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2114 let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2115 expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
2117 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_1.msgs[0]);
2118 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_1.commitment_msg);
2119 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2120 // B is already AwaitingRAA, so cant generate a CS here
2121 let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2123 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
2124 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2125 let bs_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2127 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
2128 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2129 let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2131 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed);
2132 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2133 let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2135 // The second HTLCis removed, but as A is in AwaitingRAA it can't generate a CS here, so the
2136 // RAA that B generated above doesn't fully resolve the second HTLC from A's point of view.
2137 // However, the RAA A generates here *does* fully resolve the HTLC from B's point of view (as A
2138 // can no longer broadcast a commitment transaction with it and B has the preimage so can go
2139 // on-chain as necessary).
2140 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_cs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
2141 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_cs.commitment_signed);
2142 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2143 let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2144 expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_2);
2146 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
2147 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2148 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
2150 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
2151 expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_3, payment_secret_3, 100000);
2153 // Note that as this RAA was generated before the delivery of the update_fulfill it shouldn't
2154 // resolve the second HTLC from A's point of view.
2155 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
2156 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2157 expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
2158 let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2160 // Now that B doesn't have the second RAA anymore, but A still does, send a payment from B back
2161 // to A to ensure that A doesn't count the almost-removed HTLC in update_add processing.
2162 let (route, payment_hash_4, payment_preimage_4, payment_secret_4) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 10000);
2164 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_4,
2165 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_4), PaymentId(payment_hash_4.0)).unwrap();
2166 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2167 let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
2168 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
2169 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
2172 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_2.msgs[0]);
2173 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_2.commitment_msg);
2174 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2175 let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2177 // Now just resolve all the outstanding messages/HTLCs for completeness...
2179 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed);
2180 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2181 let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2183 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
2184 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2186 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
2187 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2188 expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
2189 let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2191 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed);
2192 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2193 let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2195 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
2196 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2198 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[0]);
2199 expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[0], payment_hash_4, payment_secret_4, 10000);
2201 claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], payment_preimage_4);
2202 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_3);
2206 fn channel_monitor_network_test() {
2207 // Simple test which builds a network of ChannelManagers, connects them to each other, and
2208 // tests that ChannelMonitor is able to recover from various states.
2209 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(5);
2210 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(5, &chanmon_cfgs);
2211 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(5, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None, None]);
2212 let nodes = create_network(5, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2214 // Create some initial channels
2215 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2216 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
2217 let chan_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
2218 let chan_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 4);
2220 // Make sure all nodes are at the same starting height
2221 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
2222 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
2223 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
2224 connect_blocks(&nodes[3], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[3].best_block_info().1);
2225 connect_blocks(&nodes[4], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[4].best_block_info().1);
2227 // Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels...
2228 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
2229 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
2230 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
2231 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
2233 // Simple case with no pending HTLCs:
2234 nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_1.2, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
2235 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2236 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
2238 let mut node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_1, None, HTLCType::NONE);
2239 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
2240 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &node_txn[0]);
2241 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2242 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan_1, Some(node_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::NONE);
2244 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
2245 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2246 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
2247 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2248 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
2250 // One pending HTLC is discarded by the force-close:
2251 let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]], 3_000_000);
2253 // Simple case of one pending HTLC to HTLC-Timeout (note that the HTLC-Timeout is not
2254 // broadcasted until we reach the timelock time).
2255 nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_2.2, &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
2256 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
2257 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2259 let mut node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_2, None, HTLCType::NONE);
2260 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32 + 1);
2261 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_2, None, HTLCType::TIMEOUT);
2262 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &node_txn[0]);
2263 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
2264 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[2], &chan_2, Some(node_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::NONE);
2266 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
2267 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2268 assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
2269 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
2270 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2272 macro_rules! claim_funds {
2273 ($node: expr, $prev_node: expr, $preimage: expr, $payment_hash: expr) => {
2275 $node.node.claim_funds($preimage);
2276 expect_payment_claimed!($node, $payment_hash, 3_000_000);
2277 check_added_monitors!($node, 1);
2279 let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
2280 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
2282 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, .. } } => {
2283 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
2284 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
2285 assert_eq!(*node_id, $prev_node.node.get_our_node_id());
2287 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2293 // nodes[3] gets the preimage, but nodes[2] already disconnected, resulting in a nodes[2]
2294 // HTLC-Timeout and a nodes[3] claim against it (+ its own announces)
2295 nodes[2].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_3.2, &nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
2296 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
2297 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
2298 let node2_commitment_txid;
2300 let node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[2], &chan_3, None, HTLCType::NONE);
2301 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32 + 1);
2302 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[2], &chan_3, None, HTLCType::TIMEOUT);
2303 node2_commitment_txid = node_txn[0].txid();
2305 // Claim the payment on nodes[3], giving it knowledge of the preimage
2306 claim_funds!(nodes[3], nodes[2], payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1);
2307 mine_transaction(&nodes[3], &node_txn[0]);
2308 check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
2309 check_preimage_claim(&nodes[3], &node_txn);
2311 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[3], true);
2312 assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2313 assert_eq!(nodes[3].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
2314 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
2315 check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2317 // Drop the ChannelMonitor for the previous channel to avoid it broadcasting transactions and
2318 // confusing us in the following tests.
2319 let chan_3_mon = nodes[3].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.remove_monitor(&OutPoint { txid: chan_3.3.txid(), index: 0 });
2321 // One pending HTLC to time out:
2322 let (payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[3], &[&nodes[4]], 3_000_000);
2323 // CLTV expires at TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1 (current height) + 1 (added in send_payment for
2326 let (close_chan_update_1, close_chan_update_2) = {
2327 connect_blocks(&nodes[3], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + 1);
2328 let events = nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
2329 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
2330 let close_chan_update_1 = match events[0] {
2331 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
2334 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2337 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. }, node_id } => {
2338 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id());
2340 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2342 check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
2344 // Clear bumped claiming txn spending node 2 commitment tx. Bumped txn are generated after reaching some height timer.
2346 let mut node_txn = nodes[3].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
2347 node_txn.retain(|tx| {
2348 if tx.input[0].previous_output.txid == node2_commitment_txid {
2354 let node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[3], &chan_4, None, HTLCType::TIMEOUT);
2356 // Claim the payment on nodes[4], giving it knowledge of the preimage
2357 claim_funds!(nodes[4], nodes[3], payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2);
2359 connect_blocks(&nodes[4], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER + 2);
2360 let events = nodes[4].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
2361 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
2362 let close_chan_update_2 = match events[0] {
2363 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
2366 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2369 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. }, node_id } => {
2370 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id());
2372 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2374 check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 1);
2375 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[4], &chan_4, None, HTLCType::SUCCESS);
2377 mine_transaction(&nodes[4], &node_txn[0]);
2378 check_preimage_claim(&nodes[4], &node_txn);
2379 (close_chan_update_1, close_chan_update_2)
2381 nodes[3].gossip_sync.handle_channel_update(&close_chan_update_2).unwrap();
2382 nodes[4].gossip_sync.handle_channel_update(&close_chan_update_1).unwrap();
2383 assert_eq!(nodes[3].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2384 assert_eq!(nodes[4].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2386 assert_eq!(nodes[3].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.watch_channel(OutPoint { txid: chan_3.3.txid(), index: 0 }, chan_3_mon),
2387 ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
2388 check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2389 check_closed_event!(nodes[4], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2393 fn test_justice_tx_htlc_timeout() {
2394 // Test justice txn built on revoked HTLC-Timeout tx, against both sides
2395 let mut alice_config = UserConfig::default();
2396 alice_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
2397 alice_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
2398 alice_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 5;
2399 let mut bob_config = UserConfig::default();
2400 bob_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
2401 bob_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
2402 bob_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 3;
2403 let user_cfgs = [Some(alice_config), Some(bob_config)];
2404 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
2405 chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
2406 chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
2407 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
2408 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &user_cfgs);
2409 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2410 // Create some new channels:
2411 let chan_5 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2413 // A pending HTLC which will be revoked:
2414 let payment_preimage_3 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
2415 // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from nodes[0]
2416 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_5.2);
2417 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 2); // First commitment tx, then HTLC tx
2418 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
2419 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_5.3.txid());
2420 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // Only HTLC and output back to 0 are present
2421 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
2422 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.txid, revoked_local_txn[0].txid());
2423 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC-Timeout
2424 // Revoke the old state
2425 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_3);
2428 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2430 let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
2431 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: penalty tx
2432 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 2); // We should claim the revoked output and the HTLC output
2433 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2434 node_txn.swap_remove(0);
2436 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2437 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2438 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_5, Some(revoked_local_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::NONE);
2440 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2441 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
2442 // Verify broadcast of revoked HTLC-timeout
2443 let node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan_5, Some(revoked_local_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::TIMEOUT);
2444 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2445 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2446 // Broadcast revoked HTLC-timeout on node 1
2447 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[1]);
2448 test_revoked_htlc_claim_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], node_txn[1].clone(), revoked_local_txn[0].clone());
2450 get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
2451 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2452 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2456 fn test_justice_tx_htlc_success() {
2457 // Test justice txn built on revoked HTLC-Success tx, against both sides
2458 let mut alice_config = UserConfig::default();
2459 alice_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
2460 alice_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
2461 alice_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 5;
2462 let mut bob_config = UserConfig::default();
2463 bob_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
2464 bob_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
2465 bob_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 3;
2466 let user_cfgs = [Some(alice_config), Some(bob_config)];
2467 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
2468 chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
2469 chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
2470 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
2471 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &user_cfgs);
2472 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2473 // Create some new channels:
2474 let chan_6 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2476 // A pending HTLC which will be revoked:
2477 let payment_preimage_4 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
2478 // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from B
2479 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_6.2);
2480 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 1); // Only commitment tx
2481 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
2482 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_6.3.txid());
2483 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // Only HTLC and output back to A are present
2484 // Revoke the old state
2485 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_4);
2487 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2489 let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
2490 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: penalty tx
2491 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1); // We claim the received HTLC output
2493 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2494 node_txn.swap_remove(0);
2496 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2497 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan_6, Some(revoked_local_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::NONE);
2499 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2500 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2501 let node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_6, Some(revoked_local_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::SUCCESS);
2502 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2503 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &node_txn[1]);
2504 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2505 test_revoked_htlc_claim_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], node_txn[1].clone(), revoked_local_txn[0].clone());
2507 get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
2508 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2509 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2513 fn revoked_output_claim() {
2514 // Simple test to ensure a node will claim a revoked output when a stale remote commitment
2515 // transaction is broadcast by its counterparty
2516 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
2517 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
2518 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
2519 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2520 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2521 // node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim the revoked output
2522 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
2523 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 1);
2524 // Only output is the full channel value back to nodes[0]:
2525 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
2526 // Send a payment through, updating everyone's latest commitment txn
2527 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 5000000);
2529 // Inform nodes[1] that nodes[0] broadcast a stale tx
2530 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2531 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2532 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2533 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
2534 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: justice tx against revoked to_local output
2536 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2538 // Inform nodes[0] that a watchtower cheated on its behalf, so it will force-close the chan
2539 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2540 get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
2541 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2542 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2546 fn claim_htlc_outputs_shared_tx() {
2547 // Node revoked old state, htlcs haven't time out yet, claim them in shared justice tx
2548 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
2549 chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
2550 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
2551 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
2552 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2554 // Create some new channel:
2555 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2557 // Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
2558 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8_000_000);
2559 // node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim both offered/received HTLC outputs on top of commitment tx
2560 let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
2561 let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
2563 // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from node[0]
2564 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
2565 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 2); // commitment tx + 1 HTLC-Timeout tx
2566 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
2567 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
2568 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
2569 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.txid, revoked_local_txn[0].txid());
2570 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC-Timeout
2571 check_spends!(revoked_local_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2573 //Revoke the old state
2574 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
2577 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2578 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2579 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2580 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2581 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2582 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2583 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
2584 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
2586 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
2587 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: penalty tx
2589 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Claim the revoked output + both revoked HTLC outputs
2590 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2592 let mut witness_lens = BTreeSet::new();
2593 witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
2594 witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[1].witness.last().unwrap().len());
2595 witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[2].witness.last().unwrap().len());
2596 assert_eq!(witness_lens.len(), 3);
2597 assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(0).next().unwrap(), 77); // revoked to_local
2598 assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(1).next().unwrap(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked offered HTLC
2599 assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(2).next().unwrap(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked received HTLC
2601 // Finally, mine the penalty transaction and check that we get an HTLC failure after
2602 // ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
2603 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
2604 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
2605 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, false);
2607 get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
2608 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2609 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2613 fn claim_htlc_outputs_single_tx() {
2614 // Node revoked old state, htlcs have timed out, claim each of them in separated justice tx
2615 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
2616 chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
2617 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
2618 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
2619 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2621 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2623 // Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
2624 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8_000_000);
2625 // node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim both offered/received HTLC outputs on top of commitment tx, but this
2626 // time as two different claim transactions as we're gonna to timeout htlc with given a high current height
2627 let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
2628 let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _payment_secret_2) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
2630 // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from node[0]
2631 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
2633 //Revoke the old state
2634 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
2637 confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0], 100);
2638 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2639 confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0], 100);
2640 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2641 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2642 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
2643 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[0], events[0..1], true);
2644 match events.last().unwrap() {
2645 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
2646 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2649 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
2650 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
2652 let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
2654 // Check the pair local commitment and HTLC-timeout broadcast due to HTLC expiration
2655 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
2656 check_spends!(node_txn[0], chan_1.3);
2657 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
2658 let witness_script = node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap();
2659 assert_eq!(witness_script.len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); //Spending an offered htlc output
2660 check_spends!(node_txn[1], node_txn[0]);
2662 // Filter out any non justice transactions.
2663 node_txn.retain(|tx| tx.input[0].previous_output.txid == revoked_local_txn[0].txid());
2664 assert!(node_txn.len() > 3);
2666 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
2667 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
2668 assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input.len(), 1);
2670 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2671 check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2672 check_spends!(node_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2674 let mut witness_lens = BTreeSet::new();
2675 witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
2676 witness_lens.insert(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
2677 witness_lens.insert(node_txn[2].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
2678 assert_eq!(witness_lens.len(), 3);
2679 assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(0).next().unwrap(), 77); // revoked to_local
2680 assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(1).next().unwrap(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked offered HTLC
2681 assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(2).next().unwrap(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked received HTLC
2683 // Finally, mine the penalty transactions and check that we get an HTLC failure after
2684 // ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
2685 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
2686 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[1]);
2687 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[2]);
2688 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
2689 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, false);
2691 get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
2692 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2693 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2697 fn test_htlc_on_chain_success() {
2698 // Test that in case of a unilateral close onchain, we detect the state of output and pass
2699 // the preimage backward accordingly. So here we test that ChannelManager is
2700 // broadcasting the right event to other nodes in payment path.
2701 // We test with two HTLCs simultaneously as that was not handled correctly in the past.
2702 // A --------------------> B ----------------------> C (preimage)
2703 // First, C should claim the HTLC outputs via HTLC-Success when its own latest local
2704 // commitment transaction was broadcast.
2705 // Then, B should learn the preimage from said transactions, attempting to claim backwards
2707 // B should be able to claim via preimage if A then broadcasts its local tx.
2708 // Finally, when A sees B's latest local commitment transaction it should be able to claim
2709 // the HTLC outputs via the preimage it learned (which, once confirmed should generate a
2710 // PaymentSent event).
2712 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
2713 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
2714 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
2715 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2717 // Create some initial channels
2718 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2719 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
2721 // Ensure all nodes are at the same height
2722 let node_max_height = nodes.iter().map(|node| node.blocks.lock().unwrap().len()).max().unwrap() as u32;
2723 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_max_height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
2724 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_max_height - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
2725 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], node_max_height - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
2727 // Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels...
2728 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
2729 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
2731 let (our_payment_preimage, payment_hash_1, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3_000_000);
2732 let (our_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _payment_secret_2) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3_000_000);
2734 // Broadcast legit commitment tx from C on B's chain
2735 // Broadcast HTLC Success transaction by C on received output from C's commitment tx on B's chain
2736 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
2737 assert_eq!(commitment_tx.len(), 1);
2738 check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_2.3);
2739 nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
2740 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], payment_hash_1, 3_000_000);
2741 nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage_2);
2742 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], payment_hash_2, 3_000_000);
2743 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 2);
2744 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2745 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
2746 assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
2747 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
2748 assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
2750 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &commitment_tx[0]);
2751 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
2752 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
2753 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2754 let node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone(); // ChannelMonitor: 2 (2 * HTLC-Success tx)
2755 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2);
2756 check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
2757 check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_tx[0]);
2758 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2759 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2760 assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
2761 assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
2762 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0);
2763 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].lock_time.0, 0);
2765 // Verify that B's ChannelManager is able to extract preimage from HTLC Success tx and pass it backward
2766 let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[1].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42};
2767 connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![commitment_tx[0].clone(), node_txn[0].clone(), node_txn[1].clone()]});
2768 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
2770 let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
2771 assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
2772 assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0.txid, chan_2.3.txid());
2773 added_monitors.clear();
2775 let forwarded_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
2776 assert_eq!(forwarded_events.len(), 3);
2777 match forwarded_events[0] {
2778 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
2779 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2781 let chan_id = Some(chan_1.2);
2782 match forwarded_events[1] {
2783 Event::PaymentForwarded { fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx, next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat } => {
2784 assert_eq!(fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
2785 assert_eq!(prev_channel_id, chan_id);
2786 assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, true);
2787 assert_eq!(next_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
2788 assert_eq!(outbound_amount_forwarded_msat, Some(3000000));
2792 match forwarded_events[2] {
2793 Event::PaymentForwarded { fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx, next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat } => {
2794 assert_eq!(fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
2795 assert_eq!(prev_channel_id, chan_id);
2796 assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, true);
2797 assert_eq!(next_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
2798 assert_eq!(outbound_amount_forwarded_msat, Some(3000000));
2802 let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
2804 let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
2805 assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 2);
2806 assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
2807 assert_eq!(added_monitors[1].0.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
2808 added_monitors.clear();
2810 assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
2812 let nodes_2_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
2813 let nodes_0_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
2815 match nodes_2_event {
2816 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. }, node_id: _ } => {},
2817 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2820 match nodes_0_event {
2821 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
2822 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
2823 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
2824 assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
2825 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
2826 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
2828 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2831 // Ensure that the last remaining message event is the BroadcastChannelUpdate msg for chan_2
2833 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
2834 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2837 macro_rules! check_tx_local_broadcast {
2838 ($node: expr, $htlc_offered: expr, $commitment_tx: expr) => { {
2839 let mut node_txn = $node.tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
2840 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2);
2841 // Node[1]: 2 * HTLC-timeout tx
2842 // Node[0]: 2 * HTLC-timeout tx
2843 check_spends!(node_txn[0], $commitment_tx);
2844 check_spends!(node_txn[1], $commitment_tx);
2845 assert_ne!(node_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0);
2846 assert_ne!(node_txn[1].lock_time.0, 0);
2848 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2849 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2850 assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
2851 assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
2853 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2854 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2855 assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
2856 assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
2861 // nodes[1] now broadcasts its own timeout-claim of the output that nodes[2] just claimed via success.
2862 check_tx_local_broadcast!(nodes[1], false, commitment_tx[0]);
2864 // Broadcast legit commitment tx from A on B's chain
2865 // Broadcast preimage tx by B on offered output from A commitment tx on A's chain
2866 let node_a_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
2867 check_spends!(node_a_commitment_tx[0], chan_1.3);
2868 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_a_commitment_tx[0]);
2869 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
2870 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2871 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2872 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
2873 assert!(node_txn.len() == 1 || node_txn.len() == 3); // HTLC-Success, 2* RBF bumps of above HTLC txn
2874 let commitment_spend =
2875 if node_txn.len() == 1 {
2878 // Certain `ConnectStyle`s will cause RBF bumps of the previous HTLC transaction to be broadcast.
2879 // FullBlockViaListen
2880 if node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid == node_a_commitment_tx[0].txid() {
2881 check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_tx[0]);
2882 check_spends!(node_txn[2], commitment_tx[0]);
2883 assert_ne!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout, node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output.vout);
2886 check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
2887 check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_tx[0]);
2888 assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout);
2893 check_spends!(commitment_spend, node_a_commitment_tx[0]);
2894 assert_eq!(commitment_spend.input.len(), 2);
2895 assert_eq!(commitment_spend.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2896 assert_eq!(commitment_spend.input[1].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2897 assert_eq!(commitment_spend.lock_time.0, nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
2898 assert!(commitment_spend.output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
2899 // We don't bother to check that B can claim the HTLC output on its commitment tx here as
2900 // we already checked the same situation with A.
2902 // Verify that A's ChannelManager is able to extract preimage from preimage tx and generate PaymentSent
2903 let mut header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[0].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42};
2904 connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header, txdata: vec![node_a_commitment_tx[0].clone(), commitment_spend.clone()] });
2905 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
2906 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
2907 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2908 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
2909 assert_eq!(events.len(), 5);
2910 let mut first_claimed = false;
2911 for event in events {
2913 Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash, .. } => {
2914 if payment_preimage == our_payment_preimage && payment_hash == payment_hash_1 {
2915 assert!(!first_claimed);
2916 first_claimed = true;
2918 assert_eq!(payment_preimage, our_payment_preimage_2);
2919 assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_2);
2922 Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {},
2923 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {},
2924 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2927 check_tx_local_broadcast!(nodes[0], true, node_a_commitment_tx[0]);
2930 fn do_test_htlc_on_chain_timeout(connect_style: ConnectStyle) {
2931 // Test that in case of a unilateral close onchain, we detect the state of output and
2932 // timeout the HTLC backward accordingly. So here we test that ChannelManager is
2933 // broadcasting the right event to other nodes in payment path.
2934 // A ------------------> B ----------------------> C (timeout)
2935 // B's commitment tx C's commitment tx
2937 // B's HTLC timeout tx B's timeout tx
2939 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
2940 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
2941 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
2942 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2943 *nodes[0].connect_style.borrow_mut() = connect_style;
2944 *nodes[1].connect_style.borrow_mut() = connect_style;
2945 *nodes[2].connect_style.borrow_mut() = connect_style;
2947 // Create some intial channels
2948 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2949 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
2951 // Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment thorugh all the channels...
2952 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
2953 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
2955 let (_payment_preimage, payment_hash, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), 3000000);
2957 // Broadcast legit commitment tx from C on B's chain
2958 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
2959 check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_2.3);
2960 nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash);
2961 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
2962 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash.clone() }]);
2963 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
2965 let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
2966 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
2968 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
2969 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
2970 assert!(!update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
2971 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
2972 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
2973 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
2975 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2977 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &commitment_tx[0]);
2978 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
2979 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
2980 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2981 let node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
2982 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 0);
2984 // Broadcast timeout transaction by B on received output from C's commitment tx on B's chain
2985 // Verify that B's ChannelManager is able to detect that HTLC is timeout by its own tx and react backward in consequence
2986 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx[0]);
2987 check_closed_event(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, false);
2988 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 200 - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
2990 let mut txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
2991 if nodes[1].connect_style.borrow().skips_blocks() {
2992 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1);
2994 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 3); // Two extra fee bumps for timeout transaction
2996 txn.iter().for_each(|tx| check_spends!(tx, commitment_tx[0]));
2997 assert_eq!(txn[0].clone().input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
3001 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &timeout_tx);
3002 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3003 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
3005 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
3007 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
3008 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3009 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3010 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
3012 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
3013 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3014 assert!(!update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
3015 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3016 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3017 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
3019 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3022 // Broadcast legit commitment tx from B on A's chain
3023 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_1.2);
3024 check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_1.3);
3026 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &commitment_tx[0]);
3027 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
3029 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
3030 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3031 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
3032 let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone(); // 1 timeout tx
3033 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
3034 check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
3035 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].clone().input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
3039 fn test_htlc_on_chain_timeout() {
3040 do_test_htlc_on_chain_timeout(ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstSkippingBlocks);
3041 do_test_htlc_on_chain_timeout(ConnectStyle::TransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks);
3042 do_test_htlc_on_chain_timeout(ConnectStyle::FullBlockViaListen);
3046 fn test_simple_commitment_revoked_fail_backward() {
3047 // Test that in case of a revoked commitment tx, we detect the resolution of output by justice tx
3048 // and fail backward accordingly.
3050 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
3051 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
3052 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
3053 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3055 // Create some initial channels
3056 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
3057 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
3059 let (payment_preimage, _payment_hash, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3000000);
3060 // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from nodes[2]
3061 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
3062 // Revoke the old state
3063 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage);
3065 let (_, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3000000);
3067 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
3068 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
3069 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
3070 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3071 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
3073 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
3074 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3075 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3076 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
3078 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref commitment_signed, .. } } => {
3079 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3080 assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
3081 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3082 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3083 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
3085 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[0]);
3086 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false, true);
3087 expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, true);
3089 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3093 fn do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(deliver_bs_raa: bool, use_dust: bool, no_to_remote: bool) {
3094 // Test that if our counterparty broadcasts a revoked commitment transaction we fail all
3095 // pending HTLCs on that channel backwards even if the HTLCs aren't present in our latest
3096 // commitment transaction anymore.
3097 // To do this, we have the peer which will broadcast a revoked commitment transaction send
3098 // a number of update_fail/commitment_signed updates without ever sending the RAA in
3099 // response to our commitment_signed. This is somewhat misbehavior-y, though not
3100 // technically disallowed and we should probably handle it reasonably.
3101 // Note that this is pretty exhaustive as an outbound HTLC which we haven't yet
3102 // failed/fulfilled backwards must be in at least one of the latest two remote commitment
3104 // * Once we move it out of our holding cell/add it, we will immediately include it in a
3105 // commitment_signed (implying it will be in the latest remote commitment transaction).
3106 // * Once they remove it, we will send a (the first) commitment_signed without the HTLC,
3107 // and once they revoke the previous commitment transaction (allowing us to send a new
3108 // commitment_signed) we will be free to fail/fulfill the HTLC backwards.
3109 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
3110 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
3111 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
3112 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3114 // Create some initial channels
3115 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
3116 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
3118 let (payment_preimage, _payment_hash, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], if no_to_remote { 10_000 } else { 3_000_000 });
3119 // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from nodes[2]
3120 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
3121 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), if no_to_remote { 1 } else { 2 });
3122 // Revoke the old state
3123 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage);
3125 let value = if use_dust {
3126 // The dust limit applied to HTLC outputs considers the fee of the HTLC transaction as
3127 // well, so HTLCs at exactly the dust limit will not be included in commitment txn.
3128 nodes[2].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id())
3129 .unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan_2.2).unwrap().holder_dust_limit_satoshis * 1000
3132 let (_, first_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], value);
3133 let (_, second_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], value);
3134 let (_, third_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], value);
3136 nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&first_payment_hash);
3137 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: first_payment_hash }]);
3138 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3139 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3140 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3141 assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3142 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3143 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
3144 assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
3145 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
3146 let bs_raa = commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], updates.commitment_signed, false, true, false, true);
3147 // Drop the last RAA from 3 -> 2
3149 nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&second_payment_hash);
3150 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: second_payment_hash }]);
3151 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3152 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3153 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3154 assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3155 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3156 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
3157 assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
3158 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
3159 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.commitment_signed);
3160 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3161 // Note that nodes[1] is in AwaitingRAA, so won't send a CS
3162 let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
3163 nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
3164 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3166 nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&third_payment_hash);
3167 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: third_payment_hash }]);
3168 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3169 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3170 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3171 assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3172 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3173 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
3174 assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
3175 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
3176 // At this point first_payment_hash has dropped out of the latest two commitment
3177 // transactions that nodes[1] is tracking...
3178 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.commitment_signed);
3179 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3180 // Note that nodes[1] is (still) in AwaitingRAA, so won't send a CS
3181 let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
3182 nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
3183 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3185 // Add a fourth HTLC, this one will get sequestered away in nodes[1]'s holding cell waiting
3186 // on nodes[2]'s RAA.
3187 let (route, fourth_payment_hash, _, fourth_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 1000000);
3188 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, fourth_payment_hash,
3189 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(fourth_payment_secret), PaymentId(fourth_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
3190 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
3191 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
3192 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
3195 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
3196 // One monitor for the new revocation preimage, no second on as we won't generate a new
3197 // commitment transaction for nodes[0] until process_pending_htlc_forwards().
3198 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3199 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3200 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
3202 Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
3203 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3206 Event::HTLCHandlingFailed { .. } => { },
3207 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3209 // Deliberately don't process the pending fail-back so they all fail back at once after
3210 // block connection just like the !deliver_bs_raa case
3213 let mut failed_htlcs = HashSet::new();
3214 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
3216 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
3217 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3218 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
3220 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3221 assert_eq!(events.len(), if deliver_bs_raa { 3 + nodes.len() - 1 } else { 4 + nodes.len() });
3223 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => { },
3224 _ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
3227 Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
3228 assert_eq!(*payment_hash, fourth_payment_hash);
3230 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3233 Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
3234 assert_eq!(*payment_hash, fourth_payment_hash);
3236 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3239 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
3240 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3242 let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3243 assert_eq!(events.len(), if deliver_bs_raa { 4 } else { 3 });
3246 let nodes_2_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
3247 match nodes_2_event {
3248 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
3249 assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
3250 assert_eq!(update_add_htlcs.len(), 1);
3251 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3252 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
3253 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3255 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3259 let nodes_2_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
3260 match nodes_2_event {
3261 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { msg: msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id, ref data } }, node_id: _ } => {
3262 assert_eq!(channel_id, chan_2.2);
3263 assert_eq!(data.as_str(), "Channel closed because commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain.");
3265 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3268 let nodes_0_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
3269 match nodes_0_event {
3270 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref commitment_signed, .. } } => {
3271 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3272 assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 3);
3273 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3274 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3275 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
3277 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[0]);
3278 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[1]);
3279 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[2]);
3281 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false, true);
3283 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3284 assert_eq!(events.len(), 6);
3286 Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref failure, .. } => {
3287 assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
3288 // If we delivered B's RAA we got an unknown preimage error, not something
3289 // that we should update our routing table for.
3290 if !deliver_bs_raa {
3291 if let PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) } = failure { } else { panic!("Unexpected path failure") }
3294 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3297 Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
3298 assert_eq!(*payment_hash, first_payment_hash);
3300 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3303 Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) }, .. } => {
3304 assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
3306 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3309 Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
3310 assert_eq!(*payment_hash, second_payment_hash);
3312 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3315 Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) }, .. } => {
3316 assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
3318 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3321 Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
3322 assert_eq!(*payment_hash, third_payment_hash);
3324 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3327 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3330 // Ensure that the last remaining message event is the BroadcastChannelUpdate msg for chan_2
3332 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { msg: msgs::ChannelUpdate { .. } } => {},
3333 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3336 assert!(failed_htlcs.contains(&first_payment_hash.0));
3337 assert!(failed_htlcs.contains(&second_payment_hash.0));
3338 assert!(failed_htlcs.contains(&third_payment_hash.0));
3342 fn test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive_a() {
3343 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(false, true, false);
3344 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(true, true, false);
3345 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(false, false, false);
3346 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(true, false, false);
3350 fn test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive_b() {
3351 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(false, true, true);
3352 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(true, true, true);
3353 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(false, false, true);
3354 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(true, false, true);
3358 fn fail_backward_pending_htlc_upon_channel_failure() {
3359 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
3360 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
3361 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
3362 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3363 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 500_000_000);
3365 // Alice -> Bob: Route a payment but without Bob sending revoke_and_ack.
3367 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 50_000);
3368 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret),
3369 PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
3370 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3372 let payment_event = {
3373 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3374 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
3375 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
3377 assert_eq!(payment_event.node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3378 assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
3381 // Alice -> Bob: Route another payment but now Alice waits for Bob's earlier revoke_and_ack.
3382 let (route, failed_payment_hash, _, failed_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 50_000);
3384 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, failed_payment_hash,
3385 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(failed_payment_secret), PaymentId(failed_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
3386 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
3388 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
3391 // Alice <- Bob: Send a malformed update_add_htlc so Alice fails the channel.
3393 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 50_000);
3395 let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
3396 let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
3397 let current_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
3398 let (onion_payloads, _amount_msat, cltv_expiry) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(
3399 &route.paths[0], 50_000, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), current_height, &None).unwrap();
3400 let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
3401 let onion_routing_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash);
3403 // Send a 0-msat update_add_htlc to fail the channel.
3404 let update_add_htlc = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
3410 onion_routing_packet,
3412 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_add_htlc);
3414 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3415 assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
3416 // Check that Alice fails backward the pending HTLC from the second payment.
3418 Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
3419 assert_eq!(payment_hash, failed_payment_hash);
3421 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3424 Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
3425 assert_eq!(payment_hash, failed_payment_hash);
3427 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3430 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::ProcessingError { ref err }, .. } => {
3431 assert_eq!(err, "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC");
3433 _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events[1]),
3435 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
3436 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3440 fn test_htlc_ignore_latest_remote_commitment() {
3441 // Test that HTLC transactions spending the latest remote commitment transaction are simply
3442 // ignored if we cannot claim them. This originally tickled an invalid unwrap().
3443 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
3444 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
3445 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
3446 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3447 if *nodes[1].connect_style.borrow() == ConnectStyle::FullBlockViaListen {
3448 // We rely on the ability to connect a block redundantly, which isn't allowed via
3449 // `chain::Listen`, so we never run the test if we randomly get assigned that
3453 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
3455 route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 10000000);
3456 nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
3457 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + 1);
3458 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
3459 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3460 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
3462 let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
3463 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 3);
3464 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].txid(), node_txn[1].txid());
3466 let mut header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[1].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
3467 connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![node_txn[0].clone(), node_txn[1].clone()]});
3468 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
3469 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3470 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
3472 // Duplicate the connect_block call since this may happen due to other listeners
3473 // registering new transactions
3474 connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![node_txn[0].clone(), node_txn[2].clone()]});
3478 fn test_force_close_fail_back() {
3479 // Check which HTLCs are failed-backwards on channel force-closure
3480 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
3481 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
3482 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
3483 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3484 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
3485 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
3487 let (route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 1000000);
3489 let mut payment_event = {
3490 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
3491 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
3492 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3494 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3495 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
3496 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
3499 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
3500 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
3502 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
3504 let mut events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3505 assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
3506 payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events_2.remove(0));
3507 assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
3509 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3510 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
3511 nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg);
3512 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3513 let (_, _) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3515 // nodes[2] now has the latest commitment transaction, but hasn't revoked its previous
3516 // state or updated nodes[1]' state. Now force-close and broadcast that commitment/HTLC
3517 // transaction and ensure nodes[1] doesn't fail-backwards (this was originally a bug!).
3519 nodes[2].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&payment_event.commitment_msg.channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
3520 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
3521 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3522 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
3524 let mut node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
3525 // Note that we don't bother broadcasting the HTLC-Success transaction here as we don't
3526 // have a use for it unless nodes[2] learns the preimage somehow, the funds will go
3527 // back to nodes[1] upon timeout otherwise.
3528 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
3532 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &tx);
3534 // Note no UpdateHTLCs event here from nodes[1] to nodes[0]!
3535 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
3536 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3537 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
3539 // Now check that if we add the preimage to ChannelMonitor it broadcasts our HTLC-Success..
3541 get_monitor!(nodes[2], payment_event.commitment_msg.channel_id)
3542 .provide_payment_preimage(&our_payment_hash, &our_payment_preimage, &node_cfgs[2].tx_broadcaster, &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(node_cfgs[2].fee_estimator), &node_cfgs[2].logger);
3544 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &tx);
3545 let node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
3546 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
3547 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
3548 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, tx.txid());
3549 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0); // Must be an HTLC-Success
3550 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.len(), 5); // Must be an HTLC-Success
3552 check_spends!(node_txn[0], tx);
3556 fn test_dup_events_on_peer_disconnect() {
3557 // Test that if we receive a duplicative update_fulfill_htlc message after a reconnect we do
3558 // not generate a corresponding duplicative PaymentSent event. This did not use to be the case
3559 // as we used to generate the event immediately upon receipt of the payment preimage in the
3560 // update_fulfill_htlc message.
3562 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
3563 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
3564 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
3565 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3566 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
3568 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000);
3570 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
3571 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 1_000_000);
3572 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3573 let claim_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3574 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &claim_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
3575 expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
3577 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3578 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3580 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
3581 expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
3585 fn test_peer_disconnected_before_funding_broadcasted() {
3586 // Test that channels are closed with `ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer` if the peer disconnects
3587 // before the funding transaction has been broadcasted.
3588 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
3589 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
3590 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
3591 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3593 // Open a channel between `nodes[0]` and `nodes[1]`, for which the funding transaction is never
3594 // broadcasted, even though it's created by `nodes[0]`.
3595 let expected_temporary_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 500_000_000, 42, None).unwrap();
3596 let open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3597 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel);
3598 let accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3599 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel);
3601 let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 42);
3602 assert_eq!(temporary_channel_id, expected_temporary_channel_id);
3604 assert!(nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).is_ok());
3606 let funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3607 assert_eq!(funding_created_msg.temporary_channel_id, expected_temporary_channel_id);
3609 // Even though the funding transaction is created by `nodes[0]`, the `FundingCreated` msg is
3610 // never sent to `nodes[1]`, and therefore the tx is never signed by either party nor
3613 assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 0);
3616 // Ensure that the channel is closed with `ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer` when the peers are
3617 // disconnected before the funding transaction was broadcasted.
3618 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3619 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3621 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer);
3622 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer);
3626 fn test_simple_peer_disconnect() {
3627 // Test that we can reconnect when there are no lost messages
3628 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
3629 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
3630 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
3631 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3632 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
3633 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
3635 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3636 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3637 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
3639 let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).0;
3640 let payment_hash_2 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).1;
3641 fail_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_hash_2);
3642 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_preimage_1);
3644 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3645 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3646 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
3648 let (payment_preimage_3, payment_hash_3, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000);
3649 let payment_preimage_4 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).0;
3650 let payment_hash_5 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).1;
3651 let payment_hash_6 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).1;
3653 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3654 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3656 claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], true, payment_preimage_3);
3657 fail_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], true, payment_hash_5);
3659 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 0), (false, false));
3661 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3662 assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
3664 Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash, .. } => {
3665 assert_eq!(payment_preimage, payment_preimage_3);
3666 assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_3);
3668 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3671 Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {},
3672 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3675 Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, .. } => {
3676 assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_5);
3677 assert!(payment_failed_permanently);
3679 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3682 Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
3683 assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_5);
3685 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3689 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_preimage_4);
3690 fail_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_hash_6);
3693 fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken_lnd: bool) {
3694 // Test that we can reconnect when in-flight HTLC updates get dropped
3695 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
3696 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
3697 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
3698 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3700 let mut as_channel_ready = None;
3701 let channel_id = if messages_delivered == 0 {
3702 let (channel_ready, chan_id, _) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_a(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 100000, 10001);
3703 as_channel_ready = Some(channel_ready);
3704 // nodes[1] doesn't receive the channel_ready message (it'll be re-sent on reconnect)
3705 // Note that we store it so that if we're running with `simulate_broken_lnd` we can deliver
3706 // it before the channel_reestablish message.
3709 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).2
3712 let (route, payment_hash_1, payment_preimage_1, payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1_000_000);
3714 let payment_event = {
3715 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_1,
3716 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_1), PaymentId(payment_hash_1.0)).unwrap();
3717 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3719 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3720 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
3721 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
3723 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), payment_event.node_id);
3725 if messages_delivered < 2 {
3726 // Drop the payment_event messages, and let them get re-generated in reconnect_nodes!
3728 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
3729 if messages_delivered >= 3 {
3730 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg);
3731 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3732 let (bs_revoke_and_ack, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3734 if messages_delivered >= 4 {
3735 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
3736 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
3737 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3739 if messages_delivered >= 5 {
3740 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed);
3741 let as_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3742 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
3743 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3745 if messages_delivered >= 6 {
3746 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
3747 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
3748 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3755 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3756 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3757 if messages_delivered < 3 {
3758 if simulate_broken_lnd {
3759 // lnd has a long-standing bug where they send a channel_ready prior to a
3760 // channel_reestablish if you reconnect prior to channel_ready time.
3762 // Here we simulate that behavior, delivering a channel_ready immediately on
3763 // reconnect. Note that we don't bother skipping the now-duplicate channel_ready sent
3764 // in `reconnect_nodes` but we currently don't fail based on that.
3766 // See-also <https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/4006>
3767 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_ready(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_channel_ready.as_ref().unwrap().0);
3769 // Even if the channel_ready messages get exchanged, as long as nothing further was
3770 // received on either side, both sides will need to resend them.
3771 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 1), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
3772 } else if messages_delivered == 3 {
3773 // nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed
3774 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (-1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (true, false));
3775 } else if messages_delivered == 4 {
3776 // nodes[0] still wants its commitment_signed
3777 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (-1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
3778 } else if messages_delivered == 5 {
3779 // nodes[1] still wants its final RAA
3780 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, true));
3781 } else if messages_delivered == 6 {
3782 // Everything was delivered...
3783 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
3786 let events_1 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3787 if messages_delivered == 0 {
3788 assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 2);
3790 Event::ChannelReady { .. } => { },
3791 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3794 Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
3795 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3798 assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 1);
3800 Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
3801 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3805 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3806 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3807 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
3809 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
3811 let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3812 assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
3814 Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, .. } => {
3815 assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash);
3816 assert_eq!(amount_msat, 1_000_000);
3817 assert_eq!(receiver_node_id.unwrap(), nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3818 assert_eq!(via_channel_id, Some(channel_id));
3820 PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
3821 assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
3822 assert_eq!(payment_secret_1, *payment_secret);
3824 _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
3827 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3830 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1);
3831 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3832 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, 1_000_000);
3834 let events_3 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3835 assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
3836 let (update_fulfill_htlc, commitment_signed) = match events_3[0] {
3837 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, ref updates } => {
3838 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3839 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3840 assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
3841 assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
3842 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3843 assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
3844 (updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0].clone(), updates.commitment_signed.clone())
3846 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3849 if messages_delivered >= 1 {
3850 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fulfill_htlc);
3852 let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3853 assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
3855 Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, .. } => {
3856 assert_eq!(payment_preimage_1, *payment_preimage);
3857 assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash);
3859 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3862 if messages_delivered >= 2 {
3863 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
3864 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3865 let (as_revoke_and_ack, as_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3867 if messages_delivered >= 3 {
3868 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
3869 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
3870 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3872 if messages_delivered >= 4 {
3873 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_commitment_signed);
3874 let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3875 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
3876 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3878 if messages_delivered >= 5 {
3879 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
3880 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
3881 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3888 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3889 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3890 if messages_delivered < 2 {
3891 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
3892 if messages_delivered < 1 {
3893 expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
3895 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
3897 } else if messages_delivered == 2 {
3898 // nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed
3899 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, -1), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, true));
3900 } else if messages_delivered == 3 {
3901 // nodes[0] still wants its commitment_signed
3902 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, -1), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
3903 } else if messages_delivered == 4 {
3904 // nodes[1] still wants its final RAA
3905 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (true, false));
3906 } else if messages_delivered == 5 {
3907 // Everything was delivered...
3908 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
3911 if messages_delivered == 1 || messages_delivered == 2 {
3912 expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
3914 if messages_delivered <= 5 {
3915 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3916 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3918 reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
3920 if messages_delivered > 2 {
3921 expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
3924 // Channel should still work fine...
3925 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
3926 let payment_preimage_2 = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 1000000).0;
3927 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2);
3931 fn test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect_a() {
3932 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(0, true);
3933 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(0, false);
3934 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(1, false);
3935 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(2, false);
3939 fn test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect_b() {
3940 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(3, false);
3941 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(4, false);
3942 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(5, false);
3943 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(6, false);
3947 fn test_channel_ready_without_best_block_updated() {
3948 // Previously, if we were offline when a funding transaction was locked in, and then we came
3949 // back online, calling best_block_updated once followed by transactions_confirmed, we'd not
3950 // generate a channel_ready until a later best_block_updated. This tests that we generate the
3951 // channel_ready immediately instead.
3952 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
3953 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
3954 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
3955 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3956 *nodes[0].connect_style.borrow_mut() = ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstSkippingBlocks;
3958 let funding_tx = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_init(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 1_000_000, 0);
3960 let conf_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1;
3961 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH);
3962 let block_txn = [funding_tx];
3963 let conf_txn: Vec<_> = block_txn.iter().enumerate().collect();
3964 let conf_block_header = nodes[0].get_block_header(conf_height);
3965 nodes[0].node.transactions_confirmed(&conf_block_header, &conf_txn[..], conf_height);
3967 // Ensure nodes[0] generates a channel_ready after the transactions_confirmed
3968 let as_channel_ready = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReady, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3969 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_ready(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_channel_ready);
3973 fn test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect_dual_htlc() {
3974 // Test that we can handle reconnecting when both sides of a channel have pending
3975 // commitment_updates when we disconnect.
3976 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
3977 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
3978 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
3979 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3980 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
3982 let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000);
3984 // Now try to send a second payment which will fail to send
3985 let (route, payment_hash_2, payment_preimage_2, payment_secret_2) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
3986 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_2,
3987 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_2), PaymentId(payment_hash_2.0)).unwrap();
3988 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3990 let events_1 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3991 assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 1);
3993 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
3994 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3997 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1);
3998 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, 1_000_000);
3999 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4001 let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4002 assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
4004 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
4005 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4006 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4007 assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
4008 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
4009 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4010 assert!(update_fee.is_none());
4012 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
4013 let events_3 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
4014 assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
4016 Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, .. } => {
4017 assert_eq!(*payment_preimage, payment_preimage_1);
4018 assert_eq!(*payment_hash, payment_hash_1);
4020 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4023 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
4024 let _ = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
4025 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
4026 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4028 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4031 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
4032 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4034 nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), remote_network_address: None }, true).unwrap();
4035 let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
4036 assert_eq!(reestablish_1.len(), 1);
4037 nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), remote_network_address: None }, false).unwrap();
4038 let reestablish_2 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
4039 assert_eq!(reestablish_2.len(), 1);
4041 nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[0]);
4042 let as_resp = handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
4043 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[0]);
4044 let bs_resp = handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
4046 assert!(as_resp.0.is_none());
4047 assert!(bs_resp.0.is_none());
4049 assert!(bs_resp.1.is_none());
4050 assert!(bs_resp.2.is_none());
4052 assert!(as_resp.3 == RAACommitmentOrder::CommitmentFirst);
4054 assert_eq!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_add_htlcs.len(), 1);
4055 assert!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
4056 assert!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
4057 assert!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4058 assert!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_fee.is_none());
4059 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_add_htlcs[0]);
4060 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().commitment_signed);
4061 let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4062 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
4063 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4065 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), as_resp.1.as_ref().unwrap());
4066 let bs_second_commitment_signed = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4067 assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4068 assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
4069 assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
4070 assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4071 assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_fee.is_none());
4072 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4074 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
4075 let as_commitment_signed = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
4076 assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4077 assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
4078 assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
4079 assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4080 assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_fee.is_none());
4081 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4083 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_commitment_signed.commitment_signed);
4084 let as_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
4085 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
4086 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4088 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_commitment_signed.commitment_signed);
4089 let bs_second_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4090 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
4091 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4093 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
4094 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
4095 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4097 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
4099 let events_5 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
4100 assert_eq!(events_5.len(), 1);
4102 Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, .. } => {
4103 assert_eq!(payment_hash_2, *payment_hash);
4105 PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
4106 assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
4107 assert_eq!(payment_secret_2, *payment_secret);
4109 _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
4112 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4115 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_revoke_and_ack);
4116 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
4117 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4119 expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
4120 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2);
4123 fn do_test_htlc_timeout(send_partial_mpp: bool) {
4124 // If the user fails to claim/fail an HTLC within the HTLC CLTV timeout we fail it for them
4125 // to avoid our counterparty failing the channel.
4126 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4127 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4128 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4129 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4131 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4133 let our_payment_hash = if send_partial_mpp {
4134 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(&nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
4135 // Use the utility function send_payment_along_path to send the payment with MPP data which
4136 // indicates there are more HTLCs coming.
4137 let cur_height = CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1; // route_payment calls send_payment, which adds 1 to the current height. So we do the same here to match.
4138 let payment_id = PaymentId([42; 32]);
4139 let session_privs = nodes[0].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(our_payment_hash,
4140 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), payment_id, &route).unwrap();
4141 nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &our_payment_hash,
4142 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), 200_000, cur_height, payment_id,
4143 &None, session_privs[0]).unwrap();
4144 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4145 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4146 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
4147 // Now do the relevant commitment_signed/RAA dances along the path, noting that the final
4148 // hop should *not* yet generate any PaymentClaimable event(s).
4149 pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100000, our_payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), events.drain(..).next().unwrap(), false, None);
4152 route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100000).1
4155 let mut block = Block {
4156 header: BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[0].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 },
4159 connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
4160 connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
4161 let block_count = TEST_FINAL_CLTV + CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 2 - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS;
4162 for _ in CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 2..block_count {
4163 block.header.prev_blockhash = block.block_hash();
4164 connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
4165 connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
4168 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
4170 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4171 let htlc_timeout_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4172 assert!(htlc_timeout_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4173 assert_eq!(htlc_timeout_updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
4174 assert!(htlc_timeout_updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4175 assert!(htlc_timeout_updates.update_fee.is_none());
4177 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_timeout_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
4178 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], htlc_timeout_updates.commitment_signed, false);
4179 // 100_000 msat as u64, followed by the height at which we failed back above
4180 let mut expected_failure_data = (100_000 as u64).to_be_bytes().to_vec();
4181 expected_failure_data.extend_from_slice(&(block_count - 1).to_be_bytes());
4182 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, 0x4000 | 15, &expected_failure_data[..]);
4186 fn test_htlc_timeout() {
4187 do_test_htlc_timeout(true);
4188 do_test_htlc_timeout(false);
4191 fn do_test_holding_cell_htlc_add_timeouts(forwarded_htlc: bool) {
4192 // Tests that HTLCs in the holding cell are timed out after the requisite number of blocks.
4193 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
4194 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
4195 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
4196 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4197 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4198 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
4200 // Make sure all nodes are at the same starting height
4201 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 2*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
4202 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 2*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
4203 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], 2*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
4205 // Route a first payment to get the 1 -> 2 channel in awaiting_raa...
4206 let (route, first_payment_hash, _, first_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 100000);
4207 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, first_payment_hash,
4208 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(first_payment_secret), PaymentId(first_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
4209 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().len(), 1);
4210 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4212 // Now attempt to route a second payment, which should be placed in the holding cell
4213 let sending_node = if forwarded_htlc { &nodes[0] } else { &nodes[1] };
4214 let (route, second_payment_hash, _, second_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(sending_node, nodes[2], 100000);
4215 sending_node.node.send_payment_with_route(&route, second_payment_hash,
4216 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(second_payment_secret), PaymentId(second_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
4218 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4219 let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().remove(0));
4220 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
4221 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
4222 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
4224 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
4226 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS);
4227 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
4228 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
4229 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
4232 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
4233 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4234 let fail_commit = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4235 assert_eq!(fail_commit.len(), 1);
4236 match fail_commit[0] {
4237 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fail_htlcs, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
4238 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[0]);
4239 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, true, true);
4241 _ => unreachable!(),
4243 expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], second_payment_hash, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
4245 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], second_payment_hash, false);
4250 fn test_holding_cell_htlc_add_timeouts() {
4251 do_test_holding_cell_htlc_add_timeouts(false);
4252 do_test_holding_cell_htlc_add_timeouts(true);
4255 macro_rules! check_spendable_outputs {
4256 ($node: expr, $keysinterface: expr) => {
4258 let mut events = $node.chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
4259 let mut txn = Vec::new();
4260 let mut all_outputs = Vec::new();
4261 let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
4262 for event in events.drain(..) {
4264 Event::SpendableOutputs { mut outputs } => {
4265 for outp in outputs.drain(..) {
4266 txn.push($keysinterface.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outp], Vec::new(), Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, &secp_ctx).unwrap());
4267 all_outputs.push(outp);
4270 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4273 if all_outputs.len() > 1 {
4274 if let Ok(tx) = $keysinterface.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&all_outputs.iter().map(|a| a).collect::<Vec<_>>(), Vec::new(), Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, &secp_ctx) {
4284 fn test_claim_sizeable_push_msat() {
4285 // Incidentally test SpendableOutput event generation due to detection of to_local output on commitment tx
4286 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4287 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4288 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4289 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4291 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 98_000_000);
4292 nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan.2, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
4293 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4294 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4295 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
4296 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4297 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
4298 check_spends!(node_txn[0], chan.3);
4299 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // We can't force trimming of to_remote output as channel_reserve_satoshis block us to do so at channel opening
4301 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
4302 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 - 1);
4304 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4305 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
4306 assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4307 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0]);
4308 assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input[0].sequence.0, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
4312 fn test_claim_on_remote_sizeable_push_msat() {
4313 // Same test as previous, just test on remote commitment tx, as per_commitment_point registration changes following you're funder/fundee and
4314 // to_remote output is encumbered by a P2WPKH
4315 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4316 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4317 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4318 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4320 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 98_000_000);
4321 nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan.2, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
4322 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
4323 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4324 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
4326 let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
4327 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
4328 check_spends!(node_txn[0], chan.3);
4329 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // We can't force trimming of to_remote output as channel_reserve_satoshis block us to do so at channel opening
4331 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
4332 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4333 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4334 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
4335 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4337 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4338 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
4339 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0]);
4343 fn test_claim_on_remote_revoked_sizeable_push_msat() {
4344 // Same test as previous, just test on remote revoked commitment tx, as per_commitment_point registration changes following you're funder/fundee and
4345 // to_remote output is encumbered by a P2WPKH
4347 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4348 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4349 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4350 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4352 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 59000000);
4353 let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
4354 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
4355 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4356 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
4358 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
4359 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
4360 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4361 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4362 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
4364 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4365 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
4366 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4368 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4369 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3);
4370 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]); // to_remote output on revoked remote commitment_tx
4371 check_spends!(spend_txn[1], node_txn[0]);
4372 check_spends!(spend_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0], node_txn[0]); // Both outputs
4376 fn test_static_spendable_outputs_preimage_tx() {
4377 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4378 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4379 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4380 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4382 // Create some initial channels
4383 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4385 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000);
4387 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
4388 assert_eq!(commitment_tx[0].input.len(), 1);
4389 assert_eq!(commitment_tx[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
4391 // Settle A's commitment tx on B's chain
4392 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
4393 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 3_000_000);
4394 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4395 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx[0]);
4396 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4397 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4399 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
4400 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4403 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
4404 _ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
4407 // Check B's monitor was able to send back output descriptor event for preimage tx on A's commitment tx
4408 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone(); // ChannelMonitor: preimage tx
4409 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
4410 check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
4411 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4413 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
4414 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
4415 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4417 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4418 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
4419 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0]);
4423 fn test_static_spendable_outputs_timeout_tx() {
4424 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4425 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4426 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4427 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4429 // Create some initial channels
4430 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4432 // Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels ...
4433 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
4435 let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3_000_000);
4437 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
4438 assert_eq!(commitment_tx[0].input.len(), 1);
4439 assert_eq!(commitment_tx[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
4441 // Settle A's commitment tx on B' chain
4442 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx[0]);
4443 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4444 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4446 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
4447 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4449 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
4451 // Check B's monitor was able to send back output descriptor event for timeout tx on A's commitment tx
4452 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
4453 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: timeout tx
4454 check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0].clone());
4455 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4457 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
4458 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
4459 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4460 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, false);
4462 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4463 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3); // SpendableOutput: remote_commitment_tx.to_remote, timeout_tx.output
4464 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
4465 check_spends!(spend_txn[1], node_txn[0]);
4466 check_spends!(spend_txn[2], node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]); // All outputs
4470 fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_commitment_tx() {
4471 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4472 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4473 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4474 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4476 // Create some initial channels
4477 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4479 let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
4480 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
4481 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4482 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
4484 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
4486 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
4487 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4488 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4489 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
4491 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4492 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
4493 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 2);
4494 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
4496 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
4497 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4499 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4500 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
4501 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0]);
4505 fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_htlc_timeout_tx() {
4506 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4507 chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
4508 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4509 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4510 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4512 // Create some initial channels
4513 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4515 let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
4516 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
4517 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4518 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
4520 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
4522 // A will generate HTLC-Timeout from revoked commitment tx
4523 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
4524 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
4525 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4526 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
4527 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
4529 let revoked_htlc_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
4530 assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn.len(), 1);
4531 assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4532 assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4533 check_spends!(revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
4534 assert_ne!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0); // HTLC-Timeout
4536 // B will generate justice tx from A's revoked commitment/HTLC tx
4537 let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[1].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
4538 connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone()] });
4539 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4540 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4541 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
4543 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4544 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2); // ChannelMonitor: bogus justice tx, justice tx on revoked outputs
4545 // The first transaction generated is bogus - it spends both outputs of revoked_local_txn[0]
4546 // including the one already spent by revoked_htlc_txn[1]. That's OK, we'll spend with valid
4547 // transactions next...
4548 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3);
4549 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[0]);
4551 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 2);
4552 check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[0]);
4553 if node_txn[1].input[1].previous_output.txid == revoked_htlc_txn[0].txid() {
4554 assert_ne!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
4556 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.txid, revoked_htlc_txn[0].txid());
4557 assert_ne!(node_txn[1].input[1].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
4560 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[1]);
4561 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4563 // Check B's ChannelMonitor was able to generate the right spendable output descriptor
4564 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4565 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
4566 assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4567 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[1]);
4571 fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_htlc_success_tx() {
4572 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4573 chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
4574 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4575 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4576 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4578 // Create some initial channels
4579 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4581 let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
4582 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_1.2);
4583 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4584 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
4586 // The to-be-revoked commitment tx should have one HTLC and one to_remote output
4587 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 2);
4589 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
4591 // B will generate HTLC-Success from revoked commitment tx
4592 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
4593 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4594 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4595 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
4596 let revoked_htlc_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4598 assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn.len(), 1);
4599 assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4600 assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4601 check_spends!(revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
4603 // Check that the unspent (of two) outputs on revoked_local_txn[0] is a P2WPKH:
4604 let unspent_local_txn_output = revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize ^ 1;
4605 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output[unspent_local_txn_output].script_pubkey.len(), 2 + 20); // P2WPKH
4607 // A will generate justice tx from B's revoked commitment/HTLC tx
4608 let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[0].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
4609 connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header, txdata: vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone()] });
4610 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
4611 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4612 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
4614 let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4615 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2); // ChannelMonitor: justice tx on revoked commitment, justice tx on revoked HTLC-success
4617 // The first transaction generated is bogus - it spends both outputs of revoked_local_txn[0]
4618 // including the one already spent by revoked_htlc_txn[0]. That's OK, we'll spend with valid
4619 // transactions next...
4620 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 2);
4621 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[0]);
4622 if node_txn[0].input[1].previous_output.txid == revoked_htlc_txn[0].txid() {
4623 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
4625 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, revoked_htlc_txn[0].txid());
4626 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[1].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
4629 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
4630 check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_htlc_txn[0]);
4632 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &node_txn[1]);
4633 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4635 // Note that nodes[0]'s tx_broadcaster is still locked, so if we get here the channelmonitor
4636 // didn't try to generate any new transactions.
4638 // Check A's ChannelMonitor was able to generate the right spendable output descriptor
4639 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[0], node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
4640 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3);
4641 assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4642 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]); // spending to_remote output from revoked local tx
4643 assert_ne!(spend_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
4644 check_spends!(spend_txn[1], node_txn[1]); // spending justice tx output on the htlc success tx
4645 check_spends!(spend_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0], node_txn[1]); // Both outputs
4649 fn test_onchain_to_onchain_claim() {
4650 // Test that in case of channel closure, we detect the state of output and claim HTLC
4651 // on downstream peer's remote commitment tx.
4652 // First, have C claim an HTLC against its own latest commitment transaction.
4653 // Then, broadcast these to B, which should update the monitor downstream on the A<->B
4655 // Finally, check that B will claim the HTLC output if A's latest commitment transaction
4658 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
4659 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
4660 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
4661 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4663 // Create some initial channels
4664 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4665 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
4667 // Ensure all nodes are at the same height
4668 let node_max_height = nodes.iter().map(|node| node.blocks.lock().unwrap().len()).max().unwrap() as u32;
4669 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_max_height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
4670 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_max_height - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
4671 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], node_max_height - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
4673 // Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels ...
4674 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
4675 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
4677 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3_000_000);
4678 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
4679 check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_2.3);
4680 nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
4681 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], payment_hash, 3_000_000);
4682 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
4683 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
4684 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4685 assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
4686 assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
4687 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4689 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &commitment_tx[0]);
4690 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
4691 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
4692 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
4694 let c_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone(); // ChannelMonitor: 1 (HTLC-Success tx)
4695 assert_eq!(c_txn.len(), 1);
4696 check_spends!(c_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
4697 assert_eq!(c_txn[0].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4698 assert!(c_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
4699 assert_eq!(c_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0); // Success tx
4701 // So we broadcast C's commitment tx and HTLC-Success on B's chain, we should successfully be able to extract preimage and update downstream monitor
4702 let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[1].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42};
4703 connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![commitment_tx[0].clone(), c_txn[0].clone()]});
4704 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4705 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
4706 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
4708 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
4709 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4712 Event::PaymentForwarded { fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx, next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat } => {
4713 assert_eq!(fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
4714 assert_eq!(prev_channel_id, Some(chan_1.2));
4715 assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, true);
4716 assert_eq!(next_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
4717 assert_eq!(outbound_amount_forwarded_msat, Some(3000000));
4719 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4721 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4722 let mut msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4723 assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 3);
4724 let nodes_2_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut msg_events);
4725 let nodes_0_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut msg_events);
4727 match nodes_2_event {
4728 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. }, node_id: _ } => {},
4729 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4732 match nodes_0_event {
4733 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
4734 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4735 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
4736 assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
4737 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4738 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
4740 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4743 // Ensure that the last remaining message event is the BroadcastChannelUpdate msg for chan_2
4744 match msg_events[0] {
4745 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
4746 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4749 // Broadcast A's commitment tx on B's chain to see if we are able to claim inbound HTLC with our HTLC-Success tx
4750 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
4751 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx[0]);
4752 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
4753 let b_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4754 // ChannelMonitor: HTLC-Success tx
4755 assert_eq!(b_txn.len(), 1);
4756 check_spends!(b_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
4757 assert_eq!(b_txn[0].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4758 assert!(b_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
4759 assert_eq!(b_txn[0].lock_time.0, nodes[1].best_block_info().1); // Success tx
4761 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4762 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4766 fn test_duplicate_payment_hash_one_failure_one_success() {
4767 // Topology : A --> B --> C --> D
4768 // We route 2 payments with same hash between B and C, one will be timeout, the other successfully claim
4769 // Note that because C will refuse to generate two payment secrets for the same payment hash,
4770 // we forward one of the payments onwards to D.
4771 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
4772 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
4773 // When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
4774 // It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
4775 let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
4776 config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196;
4777 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs,
4778 &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
4779 let mut nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4781 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4782 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
4783 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
4785 let node_max_height = nodes.iter().map(|node| node.blocks.lock().unwrap().len()).max().unwrap() as u32;
4786 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_max_height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
4787 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_max_height - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
4788 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], node_max_height - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
4789 connect_blocks(&nodes[3], node_max_height - nodes[3].best_block_info().1);
4791 let (our_payment_preimage, duplicate_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 900_000);
4793 let payment_secret = nodes[3].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(duplicate_payment_hash, None, 7200, None).unwrap();
4794 // We reduce the final CLTV here by a somewhat arbitrary constant to keep it under the one-byte
4795 // script push size limit so that the below script length checks match
4796 // ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT.
4797 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 40)
4798 .with_features(nodes[3].node.invoice_features());
4799 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[3], payment_params, 800_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 40);
4800 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[0], route, &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], 800_000, duplicate_payment_hash, payment_secret);
4802 let commitment_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
4803 assert_eq!(commitment_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4804 check_spends!(commitment_txn[0], chan_2.3);
4806 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_txn[0]);
4807 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4808 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4809 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
4810 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 40 + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
4812 let htlc_timeout_tx;
4813 { // Extract one of the two HTLC-Timeout transaction
4814 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
4815 // ChannelMonitor: timeout tx * 2-or-3
4816 assert!(node_txn.len() == 2 || node_txn.len() == 3);
4818 check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_txn[0]);
4819 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4820 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
4822 if node_txn.len() > 2 {
4823 check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_txn[0]);
4824 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
4825 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].output.len(), 1);
4826 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
4828 check_spends!(node_txn[2], commitment_txn[0]);
4829 assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input.len(), 1);
4830 assert_eq!(node_txn[2].output.len(), 1);
4831 assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output);
4833 check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_txn[0]);
4834 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
4835 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].output.len(), 1);
4836 assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
4839 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4840 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4841 // Assign htlc_timeout_tx to the forwarded HTLC (with value ~800 sats). The received HTLC
4842 // (with value 900 sats) will be claimed in the below `claim_funds` call.
4843 if node_txn.len() > 2 {
4844 assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4845 htlc_timeout_tx = if node_txn[2].output[0].value < 900 { node_txn[2].clone() } else { node_txn[0].clone() };
4847 htlc_timeout_tx = if node_txn[0].output[0].value < 900 { node_txn[1].clone() } else { node_txn[0].clone() };
4851 nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
4852 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], duplicate_payment_hash, 900_000);
4854 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &commitment_txn[0]);
4855 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 2);
4856 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
4857 let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4859 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
4860 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4863 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
4864 _ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
4866 let htlc_success_txn: Vec<_> = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4867 assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn.len(), 2); // ChannelMonitor: HTLC-Success txn (*2 due to 2-HTLC outputs)
4868 check_spends!(htlc_success_txn[0], commitment_txn[0]);
4869 check_spends!(htlc_success_txn[1], commitment_txn[0]);
4870 assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4871 assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4872 assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
4873 assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4874 assert_ne!(htlc_success_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, htlc_success_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
4875 assert_ne!(htlc_success_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, htlc_timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output);
4877 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &htlc_timeout_tx);
4878 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4879 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
4880 let htlc_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4881 assert!(htlc_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4882 assert_eq!(htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
4883 let first_htlc_id = htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0].htlc_id;
4884 assert!(htlc_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
4885 assert!(htlc_updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4886 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4888 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
4889 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
4891 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], &htlc_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
4893 expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], duplicate_payment_hash, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, true);
4895 // Solve 2nd HTLC by broadcasting on B's chain HTLC-Success Tx from C
4896 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &htlc_success_txn[1]);
4897 expect_payment_forwarded!(nodes[1], nodes[0], nodes[2], Some(196), true, true);
4898 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4899 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4900 assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
4901 assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
4902 assert_ne!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0].htlc_id, first_htlc_id);
4903 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4904 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4906 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
4907 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], &updates.commitment_signed, false);
4908 expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], our_payment_preimage, None, true);
4912 fn test_dynamic_spendable_outputs_local_htlc_success_tx() {
4913 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4914 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4915 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4916 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4918 // Create some initial channels
4919 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4921 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 9_000_000);
4922 let local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_1.2);
4923 assert_eq!(local_txn.len(), 1);
4924 assert_eq!(local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4925 check_spends!(local_txn[0], chan_1.3);
4927 // Give B knowledge of preimage to be able to generate a local HTLC-Success Tx
4928 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
4929 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 9_000_000);
4930 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4932 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &local_txn[0]);
4933 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4934 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
4935 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4937 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
4938 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4941 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
4942 _ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
4945 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
4946 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
4947 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4948 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4949 check_spends!(node_txn[0], local_txn[0]);
4953 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_tx);
4954 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 - 1);
4956 // Verify that B is able to spend its own HTLC-Success tx thanks to spendable output event given back by its ChannelMonitor
4957 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4958 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
4959 assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4960 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_tx);
4961 assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input[0].sequence.0, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
4964 fn do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(deliver_last_raa: bool, announce_latest: bool) {
4965 // Test that we fail backwards the full set of HTLCs we need to when remote broadcasts an
4966 // unrevoked commitment transaction.
4967 // This includes HTLCs which were below the dust threshold as well as HTLCs which were awaiting
4968 // a remote RAA before they could be failed backwards (and combinations thereof).
4969 // We also test duplicate-hash HTLCs by adding two nodes on each side of the target nodes which
4970 // use the same payment hashes.
4971 // Thus, we use a six-node network:
4976 // And test where C fails back to A/B when D announces its latest commitment transaction
4977 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(6);
4978 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(6, &chanmon_cfgs);
4979 // When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
4980 // It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
4981 let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
4982 config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196;
4983 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(6, &node_cfgs,
4984 &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
4985 let nodes = create_network(6, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4987 let _chan_0_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2);
4988 let _chan_1_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
4989 let chan_2_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
4990 let chan_3_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 4);
4991 let chan_3_5 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 5);
4993 // Rebalance and check output sanity...
4994 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 500000);
4995 send_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]], 500000);
4996 assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2)[0].output.len(), 2);
4998 let ds_dust_limit = nodes[3].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id())
4999 .unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan_2_3.2).unwrap().holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
5001 let (_, payment_hash_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
5003 let (_, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
5004 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], ds_dust_limit*1000);
5006 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_1, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_1, None, 7200, None).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
5008 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_2, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_2, None, 7200, None).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
5010 let (_, payment_hash_3, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000);
5012 let (_, payment_hash_4, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000);
5013 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], 1000000);
5015 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_3, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_3, None, 7200, None).unwrap());
5017 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_4, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_4, None, 7200, None).unwrap());
5020 let (_, payment_hash_5, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000);
5022 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], ds_dust_limit*1000);
5023 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_5, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_5, None, 7200, None).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
5026 let (_, payment_hash_6, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
5028 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], 1000000);
5029 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_6, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_6, None, 7200, None).unwrap());
5031 // Double-check that six of the new HTLC were added
5032 // We now have six HTLCs pending over the dust limit and six HTLCs under the dust limit (ie,
5033 // with to_local and to_remote outputs, 8 outputs and 6 HTLCs not included).
5034 assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2).len(), 1);
5035 assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2)[0].output.len(), 8);
5037 // Now fail back three of the over-dust-limit and three of the under-dust-limit payments in one go.
5038 // Fail 0th below-dust, 4th above-dust, 8th above-dust, 10th below-dust HTLCs
5039 nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_1);
5040 nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_3);
5041 nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_5);
5042 nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_6);
5043 check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 0);
5045 let failed_destinations = vec![
5046 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_1 },
5047 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_3 },
5048 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_5 },
5049 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_6 },
5051 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[4], failed_destinations);
5052 check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 1);
5054 let four_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[4], nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id());
5055 nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), &four_removes.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
5056 nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), &four_removes.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
5057 nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), &four_removes.update_fail_htlcs[2]);
5058 nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), &four_removes.update_fail_htlcs[3]);
5059 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[3], nodes[4], four_removes.commitment_signed, false);
5061 // Fail 3rd below-dust and 7th above-dust HTLCs
5062 nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_2);
5063 nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_4);
5064 check_added_monitors!(nodes[5], 0);
5066 let failed_destinations_2 = vec![
5067 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_2 },
5068 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_4 },
5070 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[5], failed_destinations_2);
5071 check_added_monitors!(nodes[5], 1);
5073 let two_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[5], nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id());
5074 nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id(), &two_removes.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
5075 nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id(), &two_removes.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
5076 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[3], nodes[5], two_removes.commitment_signed, false);
5078 let ds_prev_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2);
5080 // After 4 and 2 removes respectively above in nodes[4] and nodes[5], nodes[3] should receive 6 PaymentForwardedFailed events
5081 let failed_destinations_3 = vec![
5082 HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
5083 HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
5084 HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
5085 HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
5086 HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_5.2 },
5087 HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_5.2 },
5089 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[3], failed_destinations_3);
5090 check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
5091 let six_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[3], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
5092 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
5093 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
5094 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[2]);
5095 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[3]);
5096 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[4]);
5097 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[5]);
5098 if deliver_last_raa {
5099 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[3], six_removes.commitment_signed, false);
5101 let _cs_last_raa = commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[3], six_removes.commitment_signed, false, true, false, true);
5104 // D's latest commitment transaction now contains 1st + 2nd + 9th HTLCs (implicitly, they're
5105 // below the dust limit) and the 5th + 6th + 11th HTLCs. It has failed back the 0th, 3rd, 4th,
5106 // 7th, 8th, and 10th, but as we haven't yet delivered the final RAA to C, the fails haven't
5107 // propagated back to A/B yet (and D has two unrevoked commitment transactions).
5109 // We now broadcast the latest commitment transaction, which *should* result in failures for
5110 // the 0th, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th HTLCs, ie all the below-dust HTLCs and
5111 // the non-broadcast above-dust HTLCs.
5113 // Alternatively, we may broadcast the previous commitment transaction, which should only
5114 // result in failures for the below-dust HTLCs, ie the 0th, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 9th, and 10th HTLCs.
5115 let ds_last_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2);
5117 if announce_latest {
5118 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &ds_last_commitment_tx[0]);
5120 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &ds_prev_commitment_tx[0]);
5122 let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5123 let close_event = if deliver_last_raa {
5124 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2 + 6);
5125 events.last().clone().unwrap()
5127 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
5128 events.last().clone().unwrap()
5131 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
5132 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5135 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
5136 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
5137 if deliver_last_raa {
5138 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[2], events[0..1], true);
5140 let expected_destinations: Vec<HTLCDestination> = repeat(HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }).take(3).collect();
5141 expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!(nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), expected_destinations);
5143 let expected_destinations: Vec<HTLCDestination> = if announce_latest {
5144 repeat(HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }).take(9).collect()
5146 repeat(HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }).take(6).collect()
5149 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], expected_destinations);
5151 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 3);
5153 let cs_msgs = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5154 assert_eq!(cs_msgs.len(), 2);
5155 let mut a_done = false;
5156 for msg in cs_msgs {
5158 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, ref updates } => {
5159 // Both under-dust HTLCs and the one above-dust HTLC that we had already failed
5160 // should be failed-backwards here.
5161 let target = if *node_id == nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id() {
5162 // If announce_latest, expect 0th, 1st, 4th, 8th, 10th HTLCs, else only 0th, 1st, 10th below-dust HTLCs
5163 for htlc in &updates.update_fail_htlcs {
5164 assert!(htlc.htlc_id == 1 || htlc.htlc_id == 2 || htlc.htlc_id == 6 || if announce_latest { htlc.htlc_id == 3 || htlc.htlc_id == 5 } else { false });
5166 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), if announce_latest { 5 } else { 3 });
5171 // If announce_latest, expect 2nd, 3rd, 7th, 9th HTLCs, else only 2nd, 3rd, 9th below-dust HTLCs
5172 for htlc in &updates.update_fail_htlcs {
5173 assert!(htlc.htlc_id == 1 || htlc.htlc_id == 2 || htlc.htlc_id == 5 || if announce_latest { htlc.htlc_id == 4 } else { false });
5175 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5176 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), if announce_latest { 4 } else { 3 });
5179 target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
5180 target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
5181 target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[2]);
5182 if announce_latest {
5183 target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[3]);
5184 if *node_id == nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id() {
5185 target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[4]);
5188 commitment_signed_dance!(target, nodes[2], updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
5190 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5194 let as_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5195 assert_eq!(as_events.len(), if announce_latest { 10 } else { 6 });
5196 let mut as_failds = HashSet::new();
5197 let mut as_updates = 0;
5198 for event in as_events.iter() {
5199 if let &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref payment_failed_permanently, ref failure, .. } = event {
5200 assert!(as_failds.insert(*payment_hash));
5201 if *payment_hash != payment_hash_2 {
5202 assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, deliver_last_raa);
5204 assert!(!payment_failed_permanently);
5206 if let PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) } = failure {
5209 } else if let &Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = event {
5210 } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
5212 assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_1));
5213 assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_2));
5214 if announce_latest {
5215 assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_3));
5216 assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_5));
5218 assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_6));
5220 let bs_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5221 assert_eq!(bs_events.len(), if announce_latest { 8 } else { 6 });
5222 let mut bs_failds = HashSet::new();
5223 let mut bs_updates = 0;
5224 for event in bs_events.iter() {
5225 if let &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref payment_failed_permanently, ref failure, .. } = event {
5226 assert!(bs_failds.insert(*payment_hash));
5227 if *payment_hash != payment_hash_1 && *payment_hash != payment_hash_5 {
5228 assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, deliver_last_raa);
5230 assert!(!payment_failed_permanently);
5232 if let PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) } = failure {
5235 } else if let &Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = event {
5236 } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
5238 assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_1));
5239 assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_2));
5240 if announce_latest {
5241 assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_4));
5243 assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_5));
5245 // For each HTLC which was not failed-back by normal process (ie deliver_last_raa), we should
5246 // get a NetworkUpdate. A should have gotten 4 HTLCs which were failed-back due to
5247 // unknown-preimage-etc, B should have gotten 2. Thus, in the
5248 // announce_latest && deliver_last_raa case, we should have 5-4=1 and 4-2=2 NetworkUpdates.
5249 assert_eq!(as_updates, if deliver_last_raa { 1 } else if !announce_latest { 3 } else { 5 });
5250 assert_eq!(bs_updates, if deliver_last_raa { 2 } else if !announce_latest { 3 } else { 4 });
5254 fn test_fail_backwards_latest_remote_announce_a() {
5255 do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(false, true);
5259 fn test_fail_backwards_latest_remote_announce_b() {
5260 do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(true, true);
5264 fn test_fail_backwards_previous_remote_announce() {
5265 do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(false, false);
5266 // Note that true, true doesn't make sense as it implies we announce a revoked state, which is
5267 // tested for in test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive()
5271 fn test_dynamic_spendable_outputs_local_htlc_timeout_tx() {
5272 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5273 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5274 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5275 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5277 // Create some initial channels
5278 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
5280 let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9000000);
5281 let local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
5282 assert_eq!(local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
5283 check_spends!(local_txn[0], chan_1.3);
5285 // Timeout HTLC on A's chain and so it can generate a HTLC-Timeout tx
5286 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &local_txn[0]);
5287 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
5288 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5289 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
5290 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
5292 let htlc_timeout = {
5293 let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
5294 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
5295 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
5296 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
5297 check_spends!(node_txn[0], local_txn[0]);
5301 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &htlc_timeout);
5302 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 - 1);
5303 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false);
5305 // Verify that A is able to spend its own HTLC-Timeout tx thanks to spendable output event given back by its ChannelMonitor
5306 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[0], node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
5307 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3);
5308 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], local_txn[0]);
5309 assert_eq!(spend_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
5310 check_spends!(spend_txn[1], htlc_timeout);
5311 assert_eq!(spend_txn[1].input[0].sequence.0, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
5312 assert_eq!(spend_txn[2].input.len(), 2);
5313 check_spends!(spend_txn[2], local_txn[0], htlc_timeout);
5314 assert!(spend_txn[2].input[0].sequence.0 == BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 ||
5315 spend_txn[2].input[1].sequence.0 == BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
5319 fn test_key_derivation_params() {
5320 // This test is a copy of test_dynamic_spendable_outputs_local_htlc_timeout_tx, with a key
5321 // manager rotation to test that `channel_keys_id` returned in
5322 // [`SpendableOutputDescriptor::DelayedPaymentOutput`] let us re-derive the channel key set to
5323 // then derive a `delayed_payment_key`.
5325 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
5327 // We manually create the node configuration to backup the seed.
5328 let seed = [42; 32];
5329 let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&seed, Network::Testnet);
5330 let chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &chanmon_cfgs[0].persister, &keys_manager);
5331 let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(Network::Testnet, &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger));
5332 let scorer = Mutex::new(test_utils::TestScorer::new());
5333 let router = test_utils::TestRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), &scorer);
5334 let node = NodeCfg { chain_source: &chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source, logger: &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, tx_broadcaster: &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, fee_estimator: &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, router, chain_monitor, keys_manager: &keys_manager, network_graph, node_seed: seed, override_init_features: alloc::rc::Rc::new(core::cell::RefCell::new(None)) };
5335 let mut node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
5336 node_cfgs.remove(0);
5337 node_cfgs.insert(0, node);
5339 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
5340 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5342 // Create some initial channels
5343 // Create a dummy channel to advance index by one and thus test re-derivation correctness
5345 let chan_0 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2);
5346 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
5347 assert_ne!(chan_0.3.output[0].script_pubkey, chan_1.3.output[0].script_pubkey);
5349 // Ensure all nodes are at the same height
5350 let node_max_height = nodes.iter().map(|node| node.blocks.lock().unwrap().len()).max().unwrap() as u32;
5351 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_max_height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
5352 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_max_height - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
5353 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], node_max_height - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
5355 let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9000000);
5356 let local_txn_0 = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_0.2);
5357 let local_txn_1 = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
5358 assert_eq!(local_txn_1[0].input.len(), 1);
5359 check_spends!(local_txn_1[0], chan_1.3);
5361 // We check funding pubkey are unique
5362 let (from_0_funding_key_0, from_0_funding_key_1) = (PublicKey::from_slice(&local_txn_0[0].input[0].witness.to_vec()[3][2..35]), PublicKey::from_slice(&local_txn_0[0].input[0].witness.to_vec()[3][36..69]));
5363 let (from_1_funding_key_0, from_1_funding_key_1) = (PublicKey::from_slice(&local_txn_1[0].input[0].witness.to_vec()[3][2..35]), PublicKey::from_slice(&local_txn_1[0].input[0].witness.to_vec()[3][36..69]));
5364 if from_0_funding_key_0 == from_1_funding_key_0
5365 || from_0_funding_key_0 == from_1_funding_key_1
5366 || from_0_funding_key_1 == from_1_funding_key_0
5367 || from_0_funding_key_1 == from_1_funding_key_1 {
5368 panic!("Funding pubkeys aren't unique");
5371 // Timeout HTLC on A's chain and so it can generate a HTLC-Timeout tx
5372 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &local_txn_1[0]);
5373 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
5374 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
5375 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5376 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
5378 let htlc_timeout = {
5379 let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
5380 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
5381 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
5382 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
5383 check_spends!(node_txn[0], local_txn_1[0]);
5387 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &htlc_timeout);
5388 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 - 1);
5389 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false);
5391 // Verify that A is able to spend its own HTLC-Timeout tx thanks to spendable output event given back by its ChannelMonitor
5392 let new_keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&seed, Network::Testnet);
5393 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[0], new_keys_manager);
5394 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3);
5395 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], local_txn_1[0]);
5396 assert_eq!(spend_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
5397 check_spends!(spend_txn[1], htlc_timeout);
5398 assert_eq!(spend_txn[1].input[0].sequence.0, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
5399 assert_eq!(spend_txn[2].input.len(), 2);
5400 check_spends!(spend_txn[2], local_txn_1[0], htlc_timeout);
5401 assert!(spend_txn[2].input[0].sequence.0 == BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 ||
5402 spend_txn[2].input[1].sequence.0 == BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
5406 fn test_static_output_closing_tx() {
5407 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5408 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5409 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5410 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5412 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
5414 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
5415 let closing_tx = close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan.2, chan.3, true).2;
5417 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &closing_tx);
5418 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
5419 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
5421 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[0], node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
5422 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
5423 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], closing_tx);
5425 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &closing_tx);
5426 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
5427 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
5429 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
5430 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
5431 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], closing_tx);
5434 fn do_htlc_claim_local_commitment_only(use_dust: bool) {
5435 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5436 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5437 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5438 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5439 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
5441 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3_000_000 });
5443 // Claim the payment, but don't deliver A's commitment_signed, resulting in the HTLC only being
5444 // present in B's local commitment transaction, but none of A's commitment transactions.
5445 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
5446 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5447 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3_000_000 });
5449 let bs_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5450 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
5451 expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
5453 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.commitment_signed);
5454 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5455 let as_updates = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5456 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.0);
5457 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5459 let starting_block = nodes[1].best_block_info();
5460 let mut block = Block {
5461 header: BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: starting_block.0, merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 },
5464 for _ in starting_block.1 + 1..TEST_FINAL_CLTV - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER + starting_block.1 + 2 {
5465 connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
5466 block.header.prev_blockhash = block.block_hash();
5468 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan, None, if use_dust { HTLCType::NONE } else { HTLCType::SUCCESS });
5469 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
5470 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5471 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
5474 fn do_htlc_claim_current_remote_commitment_only(use_dust: bool) {
5475 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5476 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5477 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5478 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5479 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
5481 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 });
5482 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
5483 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
5484 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5486 let _as_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5488 // As far as A is concerned, the HTLC is now present only in the latest remote commitment
5489 // transaction, however it is not in A's latest local commitment, so we can just broadcast that
5490 // to "time out" the HTLC.
5492 let starting_block = nodes[1].best_block_info();
5493 let mut header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: starting_block.0, merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
5495 for _ in starting_block.1 + 1..TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + starting_block.1 + 2 {
5496 connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header, txdata: Vec::new()});
5497 header.prev_blockhash = header.block_hash();
5499 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan, None, HTLCType::NONE);
5500 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
5501 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5502 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
5505 fn do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(use_dust: bool, check_revoke_no_close: bool) {
5506 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
5507 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
5508 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
5509 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5510 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
5512 // Fail the payment, but don't deliver A's final RAA, resulting in the HTLC only being present
5513 // in B's previous (unrevoked) commitment transaction, but none of A's commitment transactions.
5514 // Also optionally test that we *don't* fail the channel in case the commitment transaction was
5515 // actually revoked.
5516 let htlc_value = if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 };
5517 let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], htlc_value);
5518 nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash);
5519 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
5520 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5522 let bs_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5523 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
5524 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.commitment_signed);
5525 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5526 let as_updates = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5527 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.0);
5528 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5529 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.1);
5530 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5531 let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5533 if check_revoke_no_close {
5534 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
5535 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5538 let starting_block = nodes[1].best_block_info();
5539 let mut block = Block {
5540 header: BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: starting_block.0, merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 },
5543 for _ in starting_block.1 + 1..TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 2 {
5544 connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
5545 block.header.prev_blockhash = block.block_hash();
5547 if !check_revoke_no_close {
5548 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan, None, HTLCType::NONE);
5549 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
5550 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5551 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
5553 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true);
5557 // Test that we close channels on-chain when broadcastable HTLCs reach their timeout window.
5558 // There are only a few cases to test here:
5559 // * its not really normative behavior, but we test that below-dust HTLCs "included" in
5560 // broadcastable commitment transactions result in channel closure,
5561 // * its included in an unrevoked-but-previous remote commitment transaction,
5562 // * its included in the latest remote or local commitment transactions.
5563 // We test each of the three possible commitment transactions individually and use both dust and
5565 // Note that we don't bother testing both outbound and inbound HTLC failures for each case, and we
5566 // assume they are handled the same across all six cases, as both outbound and inbound failures are
5567 // tested for at least one of the cases in other tests.
5569 fn htlc_claim_single_commitment_only_a() {
5570 do_htlc_claim_local_commitment_only(true);
5571 do_htlc_claim_local_commitment_only(false);
5573 do_htlc_claim_current_remote_commitment_only(true);
5574 do_htlc_claim_current_remote_commitment_only(false);
5578 fn htlc_claim_single_commitment_only_b() {
5579 do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(true, false);
5580 do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(false, false);
5581 do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(true, true);
5582 do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(false, true);
5587 fn bolt2_open_channel_sending_node_checks_part1() { //This test needs to be on its own as we are catching a panic
5588 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5589 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5590 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5591 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5592 // Force duplicate randomness for every get-random call
5593 for node in nodes.iter() {
5594 *node.keys_manager.override_random_bytes.lock().unwrap() = Some([0; 32]);
5597 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must ensure temporary_channel_id is unique from any other channel ID with the same peer.
5598 let channel_value_satoshis=10000;
5599 let push_msat=10001;
5600 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).unwrap();
5601 let node0_to_1_send_open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5602 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node0_to_1_send_open_channel);
5603 get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5605 // Create a second channel with the same random values. This used to panic due to a colliding
5606 // channel_id, but now panics due to a colliding outbound SCID alias.
5607 assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_err());
5611 fn bolt2_open_channel_sending_node_checks_part2() {
5612 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5613 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5614 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5615 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5617 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set funding_satoshis to less than 2^24 satoshis
5618 let channel_value_satoshis=2^24;
5619 let push_msat=10001;
5620 assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_err());
5622 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set push_msat to equal or less than 1000 * funding_satoshis
5623 let channel_value_satoshis=10000;
5624 // Test when push_msat is equal to 1000 * funding_satoshis.
5625 let push_msat=1000*channel_value_satoshis+1;
5626 assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_err());
5628 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set set channel_reserve_satoshis greater than or equal to dust_limit_satoshis
5629 let channel_value_satoshis=10000;
5630 let push_msat=10001;
5631 assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_ok()); //Create a valid channel
5632 let node0_to_1_send_open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5633 assert!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.channel_reserve_satoshis>=node0_to_1_send_open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis);
5635 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set undefined bits in channel_flags to 0
5636 // Only the least-significant bit of channel_flags is currently defined resulting in channel_flags only having one of two possible states 0 or 1
5637 assert!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.channel_flags<=1);
5639 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node should set to_self_delay sufficient to ensure the sender can irreversibly spend a commitment transaction output, in case of misbehaviour by the receiver.
5640 assert!(BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT>0);
5641 assert!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.to_self_delay==BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT);
5643 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must ensure the chain_hash value identifies the chain it wishes to open the channel within.
5644 let chain_hash=genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash();
5645 assert_eq!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.chain_hash,chain_hash);
5647 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set funding_pubkey, revocation_basepoint, htlc_basepoint, payment_basepoint, and delayed_payment_basepoint to valid DER-encoded, compressed, secp256k1 pubkeys.
5648 assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.funding_pubkey.serialize()).is_ok());
5649 assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.revocation_basepoint.serialize()).is_ok());
5650 assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.htlc_basepoint.serialize()).is_ok());
5651 assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.payment_point.serialize()).is_ok());
5652 assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.delayed_payment_basepoint.serialize()).is_ok());
5656 fn bolt2_open_channel_sane_dust_limit() {
5657 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5658 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5659 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5660 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5662 let channel_value_satoshis=1000000;
5663 let push_msat=10001;
5664 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).unwrap();
5665 let mut node0_to_1_send_open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5666 node0_to_1_send_open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis = 547;
5667 node0_to_1_send_open_channel.channel_reserve_satoshis = 100001;
5669 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node0_to_1_send_open_channel);
5670 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5671 let err_msg = match events[0] {
5672 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => {
5675 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5677 assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "dust_limit_satoshis (547) is greater than the implementation limit (546)");
5680 // Test that if we fail to send an HTLC that is being freed from the holding cell, and the HTLC
5681 // originated from our node, its failure is surfaced to the user. We trigger this failure to
5682 // free the HTLC by increasing our fee while the HTLC is in the holding cell such that the HTLC
5683 // is no longer affordable once it's freed.
5685 fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
5686 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5687 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5688 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5689 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5690 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
5692 // First nodes[0] generates an update_fee, setting the channel's
5693 // pending_update_fee.
5695 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
5696 *feerate_lock += 20;
5698 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
5699 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5701 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5702 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
5703 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
5704 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
5705 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
5707 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5710 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
5712 let mut chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5713 let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
5714 let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5715 let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5717 // 2* and +1 HTLCs on the commit tx fee calculation for the fee spike reserve.
5718 let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1, opt_anchors);
5719 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_can_send);
5721 // Send a payment which passes reserve checks but gets stuck in the holding cell.
5722 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
5723 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
5724 chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5725 assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, max_can_send);
5727 // Flush the pending fee update.
5728 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
5729 let (as_revoke_and_ack, _) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5730 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5731 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
5732 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5734 // Upon receipt of the RAA, there will be an attempt to resend the holding cell
5735 // HTLC, but now that the fee has been raised the payment will now fail, causing
5736 // us to surface its failure to the user.
5737 chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5738 assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0);
5739 nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 1 HTLC updates in channel {}", hex::encode(chan.2)), 1);
5740 let failure_log = format!("Failed to send HTLC with payment_hash {} due to Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value ({}) in channel {}",
5741 hex::encode(our_payment_hash.0), chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat, hex::encode(chan.2));
5742 nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), failure_log.to_string(), 1);
5744 // Check that the payment failed to be sent out.
5745 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5746 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
5748 &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref payment_failed_permanently, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: None }, ref short_channel_id, .. } => {
5749 assert_eq!(PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0), *payment_id.as_ref().unwrap());
5750 assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
5751 assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, false);
5752 assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, Some(route.paths[0].hops[0].short_channel_id));
5754 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5757 &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
5758 assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
5760 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5764 // Test that if multiple HTLCs are released from the holding cell and one is
5765 // valid but the other is no longer valid upon release, the valid HTLC can be
5766 // successfully completed while the other one fails as expected.
5768 fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
5769 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5770 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5771 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5772 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5773 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
5775 // First nodes[0] generates an update_fee, setting the channel's
5776 // pending_update_fee.
5778 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
5779 *feerate_lock += 200;
5781 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
5782 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5784 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5785 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
5786 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
5787 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
5788 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
5790 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5793 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
5795 let mut chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5796 let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
5797 let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5798 let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5800 // 2* and +1 HTLCs on the commit tx fee calculation for the fee spike reserve.
5802 let amt_2 = 5000000 - channel_reserve - 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 2 + 1, opt_anchors) - amt_1;
5803 let (route_1, payment_hash_1, payment_preimage_1, payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], amt_1);
5804 let (route_2, payment_hash_2, _, payment_secret_2) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], amt_2);
5806 // Send 2 payments which pass reserve checks but get stuck in the holding cell.
5807 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_1, payment_hash_1,
5808 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_1), PaymentId(payment_hash_1.0)).unwrap();
5809 chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5810 assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, amt_1);
5811 let payment_id_2 = PaymentId(nodes[0].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes());
5812 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_2, payment_hash_2,
5813 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_2), payment_id_2).unwrap();
5814 chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5815 assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, amt_1 + amt_2);
5817 // Flush the pending fee update.
5818 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
5819 let (revoke_and_ack, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5820 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5821 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_and_ack);
5822 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
5823 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 2);
5825 // Upon receipt of the RAA, there will be an attempt to resend the holding cell HTLCs,
5826 // but now that the fee has been raised the second payment will now fail, causing us
5827 // to surface its failure to the user. The first payment should succeed.
5828 chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5829 assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0);
5830 nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 2 HTLC updates in channel {}", hex::encode(chan.2)), 1);
5831 let failure_log = format!("Failed to send HTLC with payment_hash {} due to Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value ({}) in channel {}",
5832 hex::encode(payment_hash_2.0), chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat, hex::encode(chan.2));
5833 nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), failure_log.to_string(), 1);
5835 // Check that the second payment failed to be sent out.
5836 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5837 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
5839 &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref payment_failed_permanently, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: None }, ref short_channel_id, .. } => {
5840 assert_eq!(payment_id_2, *payment_id.as_ref().unwrap());
5841 assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
5842 assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, false);
5843 assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, Some(route_2.paths[0].hops[0].short_channel_id));
5845 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5848 &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
5849 assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
5851 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5854 // Complete the first payment and the RAA from the fee update.
5855 let (payment_event, send_raa_event) = {
5856 let mut msgs = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5857 assert_eq!(msgs.len(), 2);
5858 (SendEvent::from_event(msgs.remove(0)), msgs.remove(0))
5860 let raa = match send_raa_event {
5861 MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { msg, .. } => msg,
5862 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5864 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
5865 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5866 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
5867 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
5868 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5869 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
5871 Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => {},
5872 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5874 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
5875 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5876 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
5878 Event::PaymentClaimable { .. } => {},
5879 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5881 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1);
5882 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5883 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, amt_1);
5885 let update_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5886 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
5887 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], update_msgs.commitment_signed, false, true);
5888 expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
5891 // Test that if we fail to forward an HTLC that is being freed from the holding cell that the
5892 // HTLC is failed backwards. We trigger this failure to forward the freed HTLC by increasing
5893 // our fee while the HTLC is in the holding cell such that the HTLC is no longer affordable
5896 fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free_multihop() {
5897 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
5898 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
5899 // When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
5900 // It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
5901 let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
5902 config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196;
5903 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
5904 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5905 let chan_0_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
5906 let chan_1_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 100000, 95000000);
5908 // First nodes[1] generates an update_fee, setting the channel's
5909 // pending_update_fee.
5911 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
5912 *feerate_lock += 20;
5914 nodes[1].node.timer_tick_occurred();
5915 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5917 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5918 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
5919 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
5920 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
5921 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
5923 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5926 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
5928 let mut chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_0_1.2);
5929 let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
5930 let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_0_1.2);
5931 let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_0_1.2);
5933 // Send a payment which passes reserve checks but gets stuck in the holding cell.
5935 let total_routing_fee_msat = (nodes.len() - 2) as u64 * feemsat;
5936 let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1, opt_anchors) - total_routing_fee_msat;
5937 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], max_can_send);
5938 let payment_event = {
5939 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
5940 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
5941 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5943 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5944 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
5946 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
5948 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
5949 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
5950 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
5951 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
5953 chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[2], chan_1_2.2);
5954 assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, max_can_send);
5956 // Flush the pending fee update.
5957 nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
5958 let (raa, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5959 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
5960 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
5961 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
5962 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
5964 // A final RAA message is generated to finalize the fee update.
5965 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5966 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
5968 let raa_msg = match &events[0] {
5969 &MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref msg, .. } => {
5972 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5975 nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa_msg);
5976 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
5977 assert!(nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
5979 // nodes[1]'s ChannelManager will now signal that we have HTLC forwards to process.
5980 let process_htlc_forwards_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5981 assert_eq!(process_htlc_forwards_event.len(), 2);
5982 match &process_htlc_forwards_event[0] {
5983 &Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => {},
5984 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5987 // In response, we call ChannelManager's process_pending_htlc_forwards
5988 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
5989 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5991 // This causes the HTLC to be failed backwards.
5992 let fail_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5993 assert_eq!(fail_event.len(), 1);
5994 let (fail_msg, commitment_signed) = match &fail_event[0] {
5995 &MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref updates, .. } => {
5996 assert_eq!(updates.update_add_htlcs.len(), 0);
5997 assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 0);
5998 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 0);
5999 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
6000 (updates.update_fail_htlcs[0].clone(), updates.commitment_signed.clone())
6002 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6005 // Pass the failure messages back to nodes[0].
6006 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_msg);
6007 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
6009 // Complete the HTLC failure+removal process.
6010 let (raa, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6011 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6012 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
6013 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
6014 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
6015 let final_raa_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6016 assert_eq!(final_raa_event.len(), 1);
6017 let raa = match &final_raa_event[0] {
6018 &MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref msg, .. } => msg.clone(),
6019 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6021 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
6022 expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false, chan_1_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
6023 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6026 // BOLT 2 Requirements for the Sender when constructing and sending an update_add_htlc message.
6027 // BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST NOT offer amount_msat it cannot pay for in the remote commitment transaction at the current feerate_per_kw (see "Updating Fees") while maintaining its channel reserve.
6028 //TODO: I don't believe this is explicitly enforced when sending an HTLC but as the Fee aspect of the BOLT specs is in flux leaving this as a TODO.
6031 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_value_below_minimum_msat() {
6032 //BOLT2 Requirement: MUST NOT offer amount_msat below the receiving node's htlc_minimum_msat (same validation check catches both of these)
6033 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6034 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6035 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6036 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6037 let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
6039 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
6040 route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = 100;
6042 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6043 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
6044 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
6045 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
6046 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
6047 nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value", 1);
6051 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_zero_value_msat() {
6052 //BOLT2 Requirement: MUST offer amount_msat greater than 0.
6053 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6054 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6055 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6056 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6057 let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
6059 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
6060 route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = 0;
6061 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6062 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)),
6063 true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
6064 assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC"));
6066 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
6067 nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC", 1);
6071 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_zero_value_msat() {
6072 //BOLT2 Requirement: MUST offer amount_msat greater than 0.
6073 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6074 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6075 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6076 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6077 let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
6079 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
6080 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6081 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6082 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6083 let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6084 updates.update_add_htlcs[0].amount_msat = 0;
6086 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6087 nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC".to_string(), 1);
6088 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
6089 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6090 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC".to_string() });
6094 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_cltv_expiry_too_high() {
6095 //BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST set cltv_expiry less than 500000000.
6096 //It is enforced when constructing a route.
6097 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6098 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6099 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6100 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6101 let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 0);
6103 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 0)
6104 .with_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features());
6105 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], payment_params, 100000000, 0);
6106 route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().cltv_expiry_delta = 500000001;
6107 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6108 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
6109 ), true, APIError::InvalidRoute { ref err },
6110 assert_eq!(err, &"Channel CLTV overflowed?"));
6114 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_exceed_max_htlc_num_and_htlc_id_increment() {
6115 //BOLT 2 Requirement: if result would be offering more than the remote's max_accepted_htlcs HTLCs, in the remote commitment transaction: MUST NOT add an HTLC.
6116 //BOLT 2 Requirement: for the first HTLC it offers MUST set id to 0.
6117 //BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST increase the value of id by 1 for each successive offer.
6118 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6119 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6120 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6121 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6122 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 0);
6123 let max_accepted_htlcs = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id())
6124 .unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().counterparty_max_accepted_htlcs as u64;
6126 for i in 0..max_accepted_htlcs {
6127 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
6128 let payment_event = {
6129 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6130 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6131 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6133 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6134 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
6135 if let MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate{ update_add_htlcs: ref htlcs, .. }, } = events[0] {
6136 assert_eq!(htlcs[0].htlc_id, i);
6140 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
6142 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
6143 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
6144 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
6146 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
6147 expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, 100000);
6149 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
6150 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6151 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
6152 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
6153 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
6155 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
6156 nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs", 1);
6160 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_exceed_max_htlc_value_in_flight() {
6161 //BOLT 2 Requirement: if the sum of total offered HTLCs would exceed the remote's max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat: MUST NOT add an HTLC.
6162 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6163 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6164 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6165 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6166 let channel_value = 100000;
6167 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value, 0);
6168 let max_in_flight = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2).counterparty_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat;
6170 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], max_in_flight);
6172 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_in_flight);
6173 // Manually create a route over our max in flight (which our router normally automatically
6175 route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = max_in_flight + 1;
6176 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6177 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
6178 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
6179 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
6181 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
6182 nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept", 1);
6184 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], max_in_flight);
6187 // BOLT 2 Requirements for the Receiver when handling an update_add_htlc message.
6189 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_amount_received_more_than_min() {
6190 //BOLT2 Requirement: receiving an amount_msat equal to 0, OR less than its own htlc_minimum_msat -> SHOULD fail the channel.
6191 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6192 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6193 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6194 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6195 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
6196 let htlc_minimum_msat: u64;
6198 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
6199 let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
6200 let channel = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
6201 htlc_minimum_msat = channel.get_holder_htlc_minimum_msat();
6204 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], htlc_minimum_msat);
6205 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6206 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6207 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6208 let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6209 updates.update_add_htlcs[0].amount_msat = htlc_minimum_msat-1;
6210 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6211 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6212 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
6213 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote side tried to send less than our minimum HTLC value\. Lower limit: \(\d+\)\. Actual: \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6214 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6215 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data });
6219 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_sender_can_afford_amount_sent() {
6220 //BOLT2 Requirement: receiving an amount_msat that the sending node cannot afford at the current feerate_per_kw (while maintaining its channel reserve): SHOULD fail the channel
6221 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6222 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6223 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6224 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6225 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
6227 let chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
6228 let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
6229 let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
6230 let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
6231 // The 2* and +1 are for the fee spike reserve.
6232 let commit_tx_fee_outbound = 2 * commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1, opt_anchors);
6234 let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - commit_tx_fee_outbound;
6235 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_can_send);
6236 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6237 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6238 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6239 let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6241 // Even though channel-initiator senders are required to respect the fee_spike_reserve,
6242 // at this time channel-initiatee receivers are not required to enforce that senders
6243 // respect the fee_spike_reserve.
6244 updates.update_add_htlcs[0].amount_msat = max_can_send + commit_tx_fee_outbound + 1;
6245 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6247 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6248 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
6249 assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value");
6250 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6251 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data });
6255 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_max_htlc_limit() {
6256 //BOLT 2 Requirement: if a sending node adds more than its max_accepted_htlcs HTLCs to its local commitment transaction: SHOULD fail the channel
6257 //BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST allow multiple HTLCs with the same payment_hash.
6258 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6259 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6260 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6261 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6262 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
6264 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 3999999);
6265 let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
6266 let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
6267 let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::signing_only(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
6268 let (onion_payloads, _htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(
6269 &route.paths[0], 3999999, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
6270 let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash);
6272 let mut msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
6276 payment_hash: our_payment_hash,
6277 cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
6278 onion_routing_packet: onion_packet.clone(),
6282 msg.htlc_id = i as u64;
6283 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
6285 msg.htlc_id = (50) as u64;
6286 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
6288 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6289 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
6290 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to push more than our max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6291 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6292 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data });
6296 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_max_in_flight_msat() {
6297 //OR adds more than its max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat worth of offered HTLCs to its local commitment transaction: SHOULD fail the channel
6298 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6299 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6300 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6301 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6302 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 1000000);
6304 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
6305 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6306 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6307 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6308 let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6309 updates.update_add_htlcs[0].amount_msat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[0], chan.2).counterparty_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat + 1;
6310 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6312 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6313 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
6314 assert!(regex::Regex::new("Remote HTLC add would put them over our max HTLC value").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6315 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6316 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data });
6320 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_cltv_expiry() {
6321 //BOLT2 Requirement: if sending node sets cltv_expiry to greater or equal to 500000000: SHOULD fail the channel.
6322 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6323 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6324 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6325 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6327 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
6328 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
6329 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6330 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6331 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6332 let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6333 updates.update_add_htlcs[0].cltv_expiry = 500000000;
6334 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6336 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6337 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
6338 assert_eq!(err_msg.data,"Remote provided CLTV expiry in seconds instead of block height");
6339 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6340 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data });
6344 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_repeated_id_ignore() {
6345 //BOLT 2 requirement: if the sender did not previously acknowledge the commitment of that HTLC: MUST ignore a repeated id value after a reconnection.
6346 // We test this by first testing that that repeated HTLCs pass commitment signature checks
6347 // after disconnect and that non-sequential htlc_ids result in a channel failure.
6348 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6349 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6350 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6351 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6353 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6354 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
6355 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6356 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6357 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6358 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6359 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6361 //Disconnect and Reconnect
6362 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6363 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
6364 nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), remote_network_address: None }, true).unwrap();
6365 let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
6366 assert_eq!(reestablish_1.len(), 1);
6367 nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), remote_network_address: None }, false).unwrap();
6368 let reestablish_2 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
6369 assert_eq!(reestablish_2.len(), 1);
6370 nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[0]);
6371 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
6372 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[0]);
6373 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
6376 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6377 assert_eq!(updates.commitment_signed.htlc_signatures.len(), 1);
6378 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.commitment_signed);
6379 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6380 let _bs_responses = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
6382 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6384 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6385 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
6386 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote skipped HTLC ID \(skipped ID: \d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6387 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6388 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data });
6392 fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fulfill_htlc_before_commitment() {
6393 //BOLT 2 Requirement: until the corresponding HTLC is irrevocably committed in both sides' commitment transactions: MUST NOT send an update_fulfill_htlc, update_fail_htlc, or update_fail_malformed_htlc.
6395 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6396 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6397 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6398 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6399 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6400 let (route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
6401 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6402 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6404 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6405 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6406 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6408 let update_msg = msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC{
6411 payment_preimage: our_payment_preimage,
6414 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
6416 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6417 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
6418 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6419 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6420 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data });
6424 fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fail_htlc_before_commitment() {
6425 //BOLT 2 Requirement: until the corresponding HTLC is irrevocably committed in both sides' commitment transactions: MUST NOT send an update_fulfill_htlc, update_fail_htlc, or update_fail_malformed_htlc.
6427 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6428 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6429 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6430 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6431 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6433 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
6434 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6435 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6436 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6437 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6438 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6440 let update_msg = msgs::UpdateFailHTLC{
6443 reason: msgs::OnionErrorPacket { data: Vec::new()},
6446 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
6448 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6449 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
6450 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6451 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6452 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data });
6456 fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fail_malformed_htlc_before_commitment() {
6457 //BOLT 2 Requirement: until the corresponding HTLC is irrevocably committed in both sides' commitment transactions: MUST NOT send an update_fulfill_htlc, update_fail_htlc, or update_fail_malformed_htlc.
6459 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6460 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6461 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6462 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6463 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6465 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
6466 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6467 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6468 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6469 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6470 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6471 let update_msg = msgs::UpdateFailMalformedHTLC{
6474 sha256_of_onion: [1; 32],
6475 failure_code: 0x8000,
6478 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
6480 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6481 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
6482 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6483 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6484 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data });
6488 fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_incorrect_htlc_id() {
6489 //BOLT 2 Requirement: A receiving node: if the id does not correspond to an HTLC in its current commitment transaction MUST fail the channel.
6491 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6492 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6493 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6494 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6495 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6497 let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100_000);
6499 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
6500 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6501 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, 100_000);
6503 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6504 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
6505 let mut update_fulfill_msg: msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC = {
6507 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
6508 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
6509 assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
6510 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
6511 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
6512 assert!(update_fee.is_none());
6513 update_fulfill_htlcs[0].clone()
6515 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6519 update_fulfill_msg.htlc_id = 1;
6521 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fulfill_msg);
6523 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6524 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
6525 assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote tried to fulfill/fail an HTLC we couldn't find");
6526 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6527 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data });
6531 fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_wrong_preimage() {
6532 //BOLT 2 Requirement: A receiving node: if the payment_preimage value in update_fulfill_htlc doesn't SHA256 hash to the corresponding HTLC payment_hash MUST fail the channel.
6534 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6535 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6536 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6537 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6538 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6540 let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100_000);
6542 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
6543 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6544 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, 100_000);
6546 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6547 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
6548 let mut update_fulfill_msg: msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC = {
6550 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
6551 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
6552 assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
6553 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
6554 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
6555 assert!(update_fee.is_none());
6556 update_fulfill_htlcs[0].clone()
6558 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6562 update_fulfill_msg.payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([1; 32]);
6564 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fulfill_msg);
6566 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6567 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
6568 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill HTLC \(\d+\) with an incorrect preimage").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6569 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6570 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data });
6574 fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_missing_badonion_bit_for_malformed_htlc_message() {
6575 //BOLT 2 Requirement: A receiving node: if the BADONION bit in failure_code is not set for update_fail_malformed_htlc MUST fail the channel.
6577 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6578 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6579 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6580 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6581 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 1000000);
6583 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
6584 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6585 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6586 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6588 let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6589 updates.update_add_htlcs[0].onion_routing_packet.version = 1; //Produce a malformed HTLC message
6591 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6592 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
6593 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
6595 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6597 let mut update_msg: msgs::UpdateFailMalformedHTLC = {
6599 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
6600 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
6601 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
6602 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
6603 assert_eq!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 1);
6604 assert!(update_fee.is_none());
6605 update_fail_malformed_htlcs[0].clone()
6607 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6610 update_msg.failure_code &= !0x8000;
6611 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
6613 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6614 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
6615 assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Got update_fail_malformed_htlc with BADONION not set");
6616 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6617 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data });
6621 fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_after_malformed_htlc_message_must_forward_update_fail_htlc() {
6622 //BOLT 2 Requirement: a receiving node which has an outgoing HTLC canceled by update_fail_malformed_htlc:
6623 // * MUST return an error in the update_fail_htlc sent to the link which originally sent the HTLC, using the failure_code given and setting the data to sha256_of_onion.
6625 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
6626 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
6627 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
6628 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6629 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 1000000);
6630 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 1000000, 1000000);
6632 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 100000);
6635 let mut payment_event = {
6636 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6637 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6638 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6639 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6640 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
6641 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
6643 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
6644 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
6645 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
6646 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
6647 let mut events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6648 assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
6649 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6650 payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events_2.remove(0));
6651 assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
6654 payment_event.msgs[0].onion_routing_packet.version = 1; //Produce a malformed HTLC message
6655 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
6656 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
6657 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], payment_event.commitment_msg, false, true);
6659 let events_3 = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6660 assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
6661 let update_msg : (msgs::UpdateFailMalformedHTLC, msgs::CommitmentSigned) = {
6663 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
6664 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
6665 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
6666 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
6667 assert_eq!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 1);
6668 assert!(update_fee.is_none());
6669 (update_fail_malformed_htlcs[0].clone(), commitment_signed.clone())
6671 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6675 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg.0);
6677 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
6678 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], update_msg.1, false, true);
6679 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
6680 let events_4 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6681 assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
6683 //Confirm that handlinge the update_malformed_htlc message produces an update_fail_htlc message to be forwarded back along the route
6685 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
6686 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
6687 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
6688 assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
6689 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
6690 assert!(update_fee.is_none());
6692 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6695 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6699 fn test_channel_failed_after_message_with_badonion_node_perm_bits_set() {
6700 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
6701 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
6702 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
6703 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6704 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6705 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
6707 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 100_000);
6710 let mut payment_event = {
6711 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6712 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6713 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6714 SendEvent::from_node(&nodes[0])
6717 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
6718 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
6719 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
6720 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6721 payment_event = SendEvent::from_node(&nodes[1]);
6722 assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
6725 payment_event.msgs[0].onion_routing_packet.version = 1; // Trigger an invalid_onion_version error
6726 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
6727 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
6728 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], payment_event.commitment_msg, false, true);
6730 let events_3 = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6731 assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
6733 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref updates, .. } => {
6734 let mut update_msg = updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs[0].clone();
6735 // Set the NODE bit (BADONION and PERM already set in invalid_onion_version error)
6736 update_msg.failure_code |= 0x2000;
6738 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
6739 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
6741 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6744 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1],
6745 vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel {
6746 node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
6747 let events_4 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6748 assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
6749 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6752 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref updates, .. } => {
6753 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
6754 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
6756 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6759 let events_5 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
6760 assert_eq!(events_5.len(), 2);
6762 // Expect a PaymentPathFailed event with a ChannelFailure network update for the channel between
6763 // the node originating the error to its next hop.
6765 Event::PaymentPathFailed { error_code, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(NetworkUpdate::ChannelFailure { short_channel_id, is_permanent }) }, ..
6767 assert_eq!(short_channel_id, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id);
6768 assert!(is_permanent);
6769 assert_eq!(error_code, Some(0x8000|0x4000|0x2000|4));
6771 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6774 Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
6775 assert_eq!(payment_hash, our_payment_hash);
6777 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6780 // TODO: Test actual removal of channel from NetworkGraph when it's implemented.
6783 fn do_test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment(announce_latest: bool) {
6784 // Dust-HTLC failure updates must be delayed until failure-trigger tx (in this case local commitment) reach ANTI_REORG_DELAY
6785 // We can have at most two valid local commitment tx, so both cases must be covered, and both txs must be checked to get them all as
6786 // HTLC could have been removed from lastest local commitment tx but still valid until we get remote RAA
6788 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6789 chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
6790 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6791 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6792 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6793 let chan =create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6795 let bs_dust_limit = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id())
6796 .unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
6798 // We route 2 dust-HTLCs between A and B
6799 let (_, payment_hash_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], bs_dust_limit*1000);
6800 let (_, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], bs_dust_limit*1000);
6801 route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
6803 // Cache one local commitment tx as previous
6804 let as_prev_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
6806 // Fail one HTLC to prune it in the will-be-latest-local commitment tx
6807 nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_2);
6808 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
6809 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_2 }]);
6810 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6812 let remove = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
6813 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &remove.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
6814 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &remove.commitment_signed);
6815 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6817 // Cache one local commitment tx as lastest
6818 let as_last_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
6820 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6822 MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { node_id, .. } => {
6823 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6825 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6828 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id, .. } => {
6829 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6831 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6834 assert_ne!(as_prev_commitment_tx, as_last_commitment_tx);
6835 // Fail the 2 dust-HTLCs, move their failure in maturation buffer (htlc_updated_waiting_threshold_conf)
6836 if announce_latest {
6837 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_last_commitment_tx[0]);
6839 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_prev_commitment_tx[0]);
6842 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
6843 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6844 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
6846 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
6847 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
6848 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
6849 // Only 2 PaymentPathFailed events should show up, over-dust HTLC has to be failed by timeout tx
6850 assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
6851 let mut first_failed = false;
6852 for event in events {
6854 Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
6855 if payment_hash == payment_hash_1 {
6856 assert!(!first_failed);
6857 first_failed = true;
6859 assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_2);
6862 Event::PaymentFailed { .. } => {}
6863 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6869 fn test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment() {
6870 do_test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment(true);
6871 do_test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment(false);
6874 fn do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(revoked: bool, local: bool) {
6875 // Outbound HTLC-failure updates must be cancelled if we get a reorg before we reach ANTI_REORG_DELAY.
6876 // Broadcast of revoked remote commitment tx, trigger failure-update of dust/non-dust HTLCs
6877 // Broadcast of remote commitment tx, trigger failure-update of dust-HTLCs
6878 // Broadcast of timeout tx on remote commitment tx, trigger failure-udate of non-dust HTLCs
6879 // Broadcast of local commitment tx, trigger failure-update of dust-HTLCs
6880 // Broadcast of HTLC-timeout tx on local commitment tx, trigger failure-update of non-dust HTLCs
6882 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
6883 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
6884 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
6885 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6886 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6888 let bs_dust_limit = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id())
6889 .unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
6891 let (_payment_preimage_1, dust_hash, _payment_secret_1) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], bs_dust_limit*1000);
6892 let (_payment_preimage_2, non_dust_hash, _payment_secret_2) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
6894 let as_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
6895 let bs_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2);
6897 // We revoked bs_commitment_tx
6899 let (payment_preimage_3, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
6900 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_3);
6903 let mut timeout_tx = Vec::new();
6905 // We fail dust-HTLC 1 by broadcast of local commitment tx
6906 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_commitment_tx[0]);
6907 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
6908 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
6909 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], dust_hash, false);
6911 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS - ANTI_REORG_DELAY);
6912 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
6913 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6914 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
6915 timeout_tx.push(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap()[0].clone());
6916 assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
6917 // We fail non-dust-HTLC 2 by broadcast of local HTLC-timeout tx on local commitment tx
6918 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
6919 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &timeout_tx[0]);
6920 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
6921 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], non_dust_hash, false);
6923 // We fail dust-HTLC 1 by broadcast of remote commitment tx. If revoked, fail also non-dust HTLC
6924 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &bs_commitment_tx[0]);
6925 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
6926 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6927 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
6928 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
6930 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
6931 timeout_tx = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().drain(..)
6932 .filter(|tx| tx.input[0].previous_output.txid == bs_commitment_tx[0].txid()).collect();
6933 check_spends!(timeout_tx[0], bs_commitment_tx[0]);
6934 // For both a revoked or non-revoked commitment transaction, after ANTI_REORG_DELAY the
6935 // dust HTLC should have been failed.
6936 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], dust_hash, false);
6939 assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
6941 assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].lock_time.0, 11);
6943 // We fail non-dust-HTLC 2 by broadcast of local timeout/revocation-claim tx
6944 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &timeout_tx[0]);
6945 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
6946 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
6947 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], non_dust_hash, false);
6952 fn test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update() {
6953 do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(false, true);
6954 do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(false, false);
6955 do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(true, false);
6959 fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() {
6960 // We test our channel constructors yield errors when we pass them absurd csv delay
6962 let mut low_our_to_self_config = UserConfig::default();
6963 low_our_to_self_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6;
6964 let mut high_their_to_self_config = UserConfig::default();
6965 high_their_to_self_config.channel_handshake_limits.their_to_self_delay = 100;
6966 let user_cfgs = [Some(high_their_to_self_config.clone()), None];
6967 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6968 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6969 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &user_cfgs);
6970 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6972 // We test config.our_to_self > BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT is enforced in Channel::new_outbound()
6973 if let Err(error) = Channel::new_outbound(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
6974 &nodes[0].keys_manager, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[1].node.init_features(), 1000000, 1000000, 0,
6975 &low_our_to_self_config, 0, 42)
6978 APIError::APIMisuseError { err } => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
6979 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6981 } else { assert!(false) }
6983 // We test config.our_to_self > BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT is enforced in Channel::new_from_req()
6984 nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
6985 let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
6986 open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
6987 if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
6988 &nodes[0].keys_manager, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[0].node.channel_type_features(), &nodes[1].node.init_features(), &open_channel, 0,
6989 &low_our_to_self_config, 0, &nodes[0].logger, 42)
6992 ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
6993 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6995 } else { assert!(false); }
6997 // We test msg.to_self_delay <= config.their_to_self_delay is enforced in Chanel::accept_channel()
6998 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
6999 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
7000 let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7001 accept_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
7002 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel);
7004 if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref action, .. } = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events()[0] {
7006 &ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg } => {
7007 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(msg.data.as_str()));
7008 reason_msg = msg.data.clone();
7012 } else { panic!(); }
7013 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: reason_msg });
7015 // We test msg.to_self_delay <= config.their_to_self_delay is enforced in Channel::new_from_req()
7016 nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
7017 let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7018 open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
7019 if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
7020 &nodes[0].keys_manager, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[0].node.channel_type_features(), &nodes[1].node.init_features(), &open_channel, 0,
7021 &high_their_to_self_config, 0, &nodes[0].logger, 42)
7024 ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
7025 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7027 } else { assert!(false); }
7031 fn test_check_htlc_underpaying() {
7032 // Send payment through A -> B but A is maliciously
7033 // sending a probe payment (i.e less than expected value0
7034 // to B, B should refuse payment.
7036 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7037 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7038 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7039 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7041 // Create some initial channels
7042 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
7044 let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::new();
7045 let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
7046 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV).with_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features());
7047 let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_params, &nodes[0].network_graph.read_only(), None, 10_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
7048 let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
7049 let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(our_payment_hash, Some(100_000), 7200, None).unwrap();
7050 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
7051 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
7052 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
7054 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7055 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
7056 let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
7057 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
7058 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
7060 // Note that we first have to wait a random delay before processing the receipt of the HTLC,
7061 // and then will wait a second random delay before failing the HTLC back:
7062 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
7063 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
7065 // Node 3 is expecting payment of 100_000 but received 10_000,
7066 // it should fail htlc like we didn't know the preimage.
7067 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
7069 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7070 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
7071 let (update_fail_htlc, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
7072 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
7073 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
7074 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
7075 assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
7076 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
7077 assert!(update_fee.is_none());
7078 (update_fail_htlcs[0].clone(), commitment_signed)
7080 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7082 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
7084 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlc);
7085 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false, true);
7087 // 10_000 msat as u64, followed by a height of CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH as u32
7088 let mut expected_failure_data = (10_000 as u64).to_be_bytes().to_vec();
7089 expected_failure_data.extend_from_slice(&CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH.to_be_bytes());
7090 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, 0x4000|15, &expected_failure_data[..]);
7094 fn test_announce_disable_channels() {
7095 // Create 2 channels between A and B. Disconnect B. Call timer_tick_occurred and check for generated
7096 // ChannelUpdate. Reconnect B, reestablish and check there is non-generated ChannelUpdate.
7098 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7099 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7100 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7101 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7103 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
7104 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 0);
7105 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
7108 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7109 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7111 for _ in 0..DISABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS + 1 {
7112 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
7114 let msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7115 assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 3);
7116 let mut chans_disabled = HashMap::new();
7117 for e in msg_events {
7119 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
7120 assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & (1<<1), 1<<1); // The "channel disabled" bit should be set
7121 // Check that each channel gets updated exactly once
7122 if chans_disabled.insert(msg.contents.short_channel_id, msg.contents.timestamp).is_some() {
7123 panic!("Generated ChannelUpdate for wrong chan!");
7126 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7130 nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), remote_network_address: None }, true).unwrap();
7131 let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
7132 assert_eq!(reestablish_1.len(), 3);
7133 nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), remote_network_address: None }, false).unwrap();
7134 let reestablish_2 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
7135 assert_eq!(reestablish_2.len(), 3);
7137 // Reestablish chan_1
7138 nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[0]);
7139 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
7140 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[0]);
7141 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
7142 // Reestablish chan_2
7143 nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[1]);
7144 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
7145 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[1]);
7146 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
7147 // Reestablish chan_3
7148 nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[2]);
7149 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
7150 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[2]);
7151 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
7153 for _ in 0..ENABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS {
7154 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
7156 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
7157 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
7158 let msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7159 assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 3);
7160 for e in msg_events {
7162 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
7163 assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & (1<<1), 0); // The "channel disabled" bit should be off
7164 match chans_disabled.remove(&msg.contents.short_channel_id) {
7165 // Each update should have a higher timestamp than the previous one, replacing
7167 Some(prev_timestamp) => assert!(msg.contents.timestamp > prev_timestamp),
7168 None => panic!("Generated ChannelUpdate for wrong chan!"),
7171 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7174 // Check that each channel gets updated exactly once
7175 assert!(chans_disabled.is_empty());
7179 fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_commitment() {
7180 // In case of penalty txn with too low feerates for getting into mempools, RBF-bump them to be sure
7181 // we're able to claim outputs on revoked commitment transaction before timelocks expiration
7183 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7184 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7185 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7186 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7188 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000);
7190 let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
7191 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 30)
7192 .with_features(nodes[0].node.invoice_features());
7193 let (route,_, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_params, 3000000, 30);
7194 send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3000000);
7196 let revoked_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
7197 // Revoked commitment txn with 4 outputs : to_local, to_remote, 1 outgoing HTLC, 1 incoming HTLC
7198 assert_eq!(revoked_txn[0].output.len(), 4);
7199 assert_eq!(revoked_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7200 assert_eq!(revoked_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
7201 let revoked_txid = revoked_txn[0].txid();
7203 let mut penalty_sum = 0;
7204 for outp in revoked_txn[0].output.iter() {
7205 if outp.script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh() {
7206 penalty_sum += outp.value;
7210 // Connect blocks to change height_timer range to see if we use right soonest_timelock
7211 let header_114 = connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 14);
7213 // Actually revoke tx by claiming a HTLC
7214 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
7215 let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: header_114, merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
7216 connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![revoked_txn[0].clone()] });
7217 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
7219 // One or more justice tx should have been broadcast, check it
7223 let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7224 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // justice tx (broadcasted from ChannelMonitor)
7225 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Penalty txn claims to_local, offered_htlc and received_htlc outputs
7226 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
7227 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_txn[0]);
7228 let fee_1 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
7229 feerate_1 = fee_1 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
7230 penalty_1 = node_txn[0].txid();
7234 // After exhaustion of height timer, a new bumped justice tx should have been broadcast, check it
7235 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 15);
7236 let mut penalty_2 = penalty_1;
7237 let mut feerate_2 = 0;
7239 let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7240 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
7241 if node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid == revoked_txid {
7242 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Penalty txn claims to_local, offered_htlc and received_htlc outputs
7243 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
7244 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_txn[0]);
7245 penalty_2 = node_txn[0].txid();
7246 // Verify new bumped tx is different from last claiming transaction, we don't want spurrious rebroadcast
7247 assert_ne!(penalty_2, penalty_1);
7248 let fee_2 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
7249 feerate_2 = fee_2 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
7250 // Verify 25% bump heuristic
7251 assert!(feerate_2 * 100 >= feerate_1 * 125);
7255 assert_ne!(feerate_2, 0);
7257 // After exhaustion of height timer for a 2nd time, a new bumped justice tx should have been broadcast, check it
7258 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
7260 let mut feerate_3 = 0;
7262 let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7263 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
7264 if node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid == revoked_txid {
7265 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Penalty txn claims to_local, offered_htlc and received_htlc outputs
7266 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
7267 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_txn[0]);
7268 penalty_3 = node_txn[0].txid();
7269 // Verify new bumped tx is different from last claiming transaction, we don't want spurrious rebroadcast
7270 assert_ne!(penalty_3, penalty_2);
7271 let fee_3 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
7272 feerate_3 = fee_3 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
7273 // Verify 25% bump heuristic
7274 assert!(feerate_3 * 100 >= feerate_2 * 125);
7278 assert_ne!(feerate_3, 0);
7280 nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7281 nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7285 fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_htlcs() {
7286 // In case of penalty txn with too low feerates for getting into mempools, RBF-bump them to sure
7287 // we're able to claim outputs on revoked HTLC transactions before timelocks expiration
7289 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7290 chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
7291 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7292 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7293 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7295 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000);
7296 // Lock HTLC in both directions (using a slightly lower CLTV delay to provide timely RBF bumps)
7297 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 50).with_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features());
7298 let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::new();
7299 let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
7300 let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_params, &nodes[0].network_graph.read_only(), None,
7301 3_000_000, 50, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
7302 let payment_preimage = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
7303 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 50).with_features(nodes[0].node.invoice_features());
7304 let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_params, &nodes[1].network_graph.read_only(), None,
7305 3_000_000, 50, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
7306 send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
7308 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2);
7309 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7310 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
7312 // Revoke local commitment tx
7313 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
7315 let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[1].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
7316 // B will generate both revoked HTLC-timeout/HTLC-preimage txn from revoked commitment tx
7317 connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone()] });
7318 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
7319 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
7320 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
7321 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 50); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires (note CLTV was explicitly 50 above)
7323 let revoked_htlc_txn = {
7324 let txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.unique_txn_broadcast();
7325 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 2);
7327 assert_eq!(txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
7328 assert_eq!(txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7329 check_spends!(txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7331 assert_eq!(txn[1].input.len(), 1);
7332 assert_eq!(txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
7333 assert_eq!(txn[1].output.len(), 1);
7334 check_spends!(txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7339 // Broadcast set of revoked txn on A
7340 let hash_128 = connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 40);
7341 let header_11 = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: hash_128, merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
7342 connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header: header_11, txdata: vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone()] });
7343 let header_129 = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: header_11.block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
7344 connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header: header_129, txdata: vec![revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[1].clone()] });
7345 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7346 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[0], events[0..1], true);
7347 match events.last().unwrap() {
7348 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
7349 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7355 let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7356 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 4); // 3 penalty txn on revoked commitment tx + 1 penalty tnx on revoked HTLC txn
7357 // Verify claim tx are spending revoked HTLC txn
7359 // node_txn 0-2 each spend a separate revoked output from revoked_local_txn[0]
7360 // Note that node_txn[0] and node_txn[1] are bogus - they double spend the revoked_htlc_txn
7361 // which are included in the same block (they are broadcasted because we scan the
7362 // transactions linearly and generate claims as we go, they likely should be removed in the
7364 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7365 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7366 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
7367 check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7368 assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input.len(), 1);
7369 check_spends!(node_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7371 // Each of the three justice transactions claim a separate (single) output of the three
7372 // available, which we check here:
7373 assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
7374 assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output);
7375 assert_ne!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output);
7377 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
7378 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
7380 // node_txn[3] spends the revoked outputs from the revoked_htlc_txn (which only have one
7381 // output, checked above).
7382 assert_eq!(node_txn[3].input.len(), 2);
7383 assert_eq!(node_txn[3].output.len(), 1);
7384 check_spends!(node_txn[3], revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[1]);
7386 first = node_txn[3].txid();
7387 // Store both feerates for later comparison
7388 let fee_1 = revoked_htlc_txn[0].output[0].value + revoked_htlc_txn[1].output[0].value - node_txn[3].output[0].value;
7389 feerate_1 = fee_1 * 1000 / node_txn[3].weight() as u64;
7390 penalty_txn = vec![node_txn[2].clone()];
7394 // Connect one more block to see if bumped penalty are issued for HTLC txn
7395 let header_130 = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: header_129.block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
7396 connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header: header_130, txdata: penalty_txn });
7397 let header_131 = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: header_130.block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
7398 connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header: header_131, txdata: Vec::new() });
7400 // Few more blocks to confirm penalty txn
7401 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 4);
7402 assert!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
7403 let header_144 = connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 9);
7405 let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7406 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
7408 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 2);
7409 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[1]);
7410 // Verify bumped tx is different and 25% bump heuristic
7411 assert_ne!(first, node_txn[0].txid());
7412 let fee_2 = revoked_htlc_txn[0].output[0].value + revoked_htlc_txn[1].output[0].value - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
7413 let feerate_2 = fee_2 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
7414 assert!(feerate_2 * 100 > feerate_1 * 125);
7415 let txn = vec![node_txn[0].clone()];
7419 // Broadcast claim txn and confirm blocks to avoid further bumps on this outputs
7420 let header_145 = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: header_144, merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
7421 connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header: header_145, txdata: node_txn });
7422 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 20);
7424 let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7425 // We verify than no new transaction has been broadcast because previously
7426 // we were buggy on this exact behavior by not tracking for monitoring remote HTLC outputs (see #411)
7427 // which means we wouldn't see a spend of them by a justice tx and bumped justice tx
7428 // were generated forever instead of safe cleaning after confirmation and ANTI_REORG_SAFE_DELAY blocks.
7429 // Enforce spending of revoked htlc output by claiming transaction remove request as expected and dry
7430 // up bumped justice generation.
7431 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 0);
7434 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
7435 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
7439 fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_remote_commitment() {
7440 // In case of claim txn with too low feerates for getting into mempools, RBF-bump them to be sure
7441 // we're able to claim outputs on remote commitment transaction before timelocks expiration
7444 // Provide preimage for one
7445 // Check aggregation
7447 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7448 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7449 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7450 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7452 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000);
7453 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000);
7454 route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3000000).0;
7456 // Remote commitment txn with 4 outputs : to_local, to_remote, 1 outgoing HTLC, 1 incoming HTLC
7457 let remote_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
7458 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output.len(), 4);
7459 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7460 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
7462 // Claim a HTLC without revocation (provide B monitor with preimage)
7463 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
7464 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 3_000_000);
7465 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &remote_txn[0]);
7466 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
7467 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
7469 // One or more claim tx should have been broadcast, check it
7473 let feerate_timeout;
7474 let feerate_preimage;
7476 let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7477 // 3 transactions including:
7478 // preimage and timeout sweeps from remote commitment + preimage sweep bump
7479 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 3);
7480 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7481 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
7482 assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input.len(), 1);
7483 check_spends!(node_txn[0], remote_txn[0]);
7484 check_spends!(node_txn[1], remote_txn[0]);
7485 check_spends!(node_txn[2], remote_txn[0]);
7487 preimage = node_txn[0].txid();
7488 let index = node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout;
7489 let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
7490 feerate_preimage = fee * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
7492 let (preimage_bump_tx, timeout_tx) = if node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output == node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output {
7493 (node_txn[2].clone(), node_txn[1].clone())
7495 (node_txn[1].clone(), node_txn[2].clone())
7498 preimage_bump = preimage_bump_tx;
7499 check_spends!(preimage_bump, remote_txn[0]);
7500 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, preimage_bump.input[0].previous_output);
7502 timeout = timeout_tx.txid();
7503 let index = timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout;
7504 let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - timeout_tx.output[0].value;
7505 feerate_timeout = fee * 1000 / timeout_tx.weight() as u64;
7509 assert_ne!(feerate_timeout, 0);
7510 assert_ne!(feerate_preimage, 0);
7512 // After exhaustion of height timer, new bumped claim txn should have been broadcast, check it
7513 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
7515 let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7516 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
7517 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7518 assert_eq!(preimage_bump.input.len(), 1);
7519 check_spends!(node_txn[0], remote_txn[0]);
7520 check_spends!(preimage_bump, remote_txn[0]);
7522 let index = preimage_bump.input[0].previous_output.vout;
7523 let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - preimage_bump.output[0].value;
7524 let new_feerate = fee * 1000 / preimage_bump.weight() as u64;
7525 assert!(new_feerate * 100 > feerate_timeout * 125);
7526 assert_ne!(timeout, preimage_bump.txid());
7528 let index = node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout;
7529 let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
7530 let new_feerate = fee * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
7531 assert!(new_feerate * 100 > feerate_preimage * 125);
7532 assert_ne!(preimage, node_txn[0].txid());
7537 nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7538 nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7542 fn test_counterparty_raa_skip_no_crash() {
7543 // Previously, if our counterparty sent two RAAs in a row without us having provided a
7544 // commitment transaction, we would have happily carried on and provided them the next
7545 // commitment transaction based on one RAA forward. This would probably eventually have led to
7546 // channel closure, but it would not have resulted in funds loss. Still, our
7547 // EnforcingSigner would have panicked as it doesn't like jumps into the future. Here, we
7548 // check simply that the channel is closed in response to such an RAA, but don't check whether
7549 // we decide to punish our counterparty for revoking their funds (as we don't currently
7551 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7552 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7553 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7554 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7555 let channel_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).2;
7557 let per_commitment_secret;
7558 let next_per_commitment_point;
7560 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
7561 let mut guard = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
7562 let keys = guard.channel_by_id.get_mut(&channel_id).unwrap().get_signer();
7564 const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = (1 << 48) - 1;
7566 // Make signer believe we got a counterparty signature, so that it allows the revocation
7567 keys.get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
7568 per_commitment_secret = keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER);
7570 // Must revoke without gaps
7571 keys.get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
7572 keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1);
7574 keys.get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
7575 next_per_commitment_point = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(),
7576 &SecretKey::from_slice(&keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2)).unwrap());
7579 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(),
7580 &msgs::RevokeAndACK {
7582 per_commitment_secret,
7583 next_per_commitment_point,
7585 next_local_nonce: None,
7587 assert_eq!(check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap().data, "Received an unexpected revoke_and_ack");
7588 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
7589 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Received an unexpected revoke_and_ack".to_string() });
7593 fn test_bump_txn_sanitize_tracking_maps() {
7594 // Sanitizing pendning_claim_request and claimable_outpoints used to be buggy,
7595 // verify we clean then right after expiration of ANTI_REORG_DELAY.
7597 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7598 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7599 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7600 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7602 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000);
7603 // Lock HTLC in both directions
7604 let (payment_preimage_1, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9_000_000);
7605 let (_, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 9_000_000);
7607 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2);
7608 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7609 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
7611 // Revoke local commitment tx
7612 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
7614 // Broadcast set of revoked txn on A
7615 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 2 - CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH);
7616 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[0], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_2 }]);
7617 assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 0);
7619 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
7620 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
7621 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
7622 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
7624 let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7625 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 3); //ChannelMonitor: justice txn * 3
7626 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7627 check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7628 check_spends!(node_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7629 let penalty_txn = vec![node_txn[0].clone(), node_txn[1].clone(), node_txn[2].clone()];
7633 let header_130 = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[0].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
7634 connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header: header_130, txdata: penalty_txn });
7635 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
7637 let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(OutPoint { txid: chan.3.txid(), index: 0 }).unwrap();
7638 assert!(monitor.inner.lock().unwrap().onchain_tx_handler.pending_claim_requests.is_empty());
7639 assert!(monitor.inner.lock().unwrap().onchain_tx_handler.claimable_outpoints.is_empty());
7644 fn test_pending_claimed_htlc_no_balance_underflow() {
7645 // Tests that if we have a pending outbound HTLC as well as a claimed-but-not-fully-removed
7646 // HTLC we will not underflow when we call `Channel::get_balance_msat()`.
7647 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7648 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7649 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7650 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7651 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 0);
7653 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_010_000);
7654 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
7655 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 1_010_000);
7656 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
7657 let fulfill_ev = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7659 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fulfill_ev.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
7660 expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
7661 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fulfill_ev.commitment_signed);
7662 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
7663 let (_raa, _cs) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7665 // At this point nodes[1] has received 1,010k msat (10k msat more than their reserve) and can
7666 // send an HTLC back (though it will go in the holding cell). Send an HTLC back and check we
7667 // can get our balance.
7669 // Get a route from nodes[1] to nodes[0] by getting a route going the other way and then flip
7670 // the public key of the only hop. This works around ChannelDetails not showing the
7671 // almost-claimed HTLC as available balance.
7672 let (mut route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 10_000);
7673 route.payment_params = None; // This is all wrong, but unnecessary
7674 route.paths[0].hops[0].pubkey = nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id();
7675 let (_, payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
7676 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_2,
7677 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_2), PaymentId(payment_hash_2.0)).unwrap();
7679 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels()[0].balance_msat, 1_000_000);
7683 fn test_channel_conf_timeout() {
7684 // Tests that, for inbound channels, we give up on them if the funding transaction does not
7685 // confirm within 2016 blocks, as recommended by BOLT 2.
7686 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7687 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7688 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7689 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7691 let _funding_tx = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_init(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 1_000_000, 100_000);
7693 // The outbound node should wait forever for confirmation:
7694 // This matches `channel::FUNDING_CONF_DEADLINE_BLOCKS` and BOLT 2's suggested timeout, thus is
7695 // copied here instead of directly referencing the constant.
7696 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 2016);
7697 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
7699 // The inbound node should fail the channel after exactly 2016 blocks
7700 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 2015);
7701 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
7702 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
7704 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
7705 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
7706 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::FundingTimedOut);
7707 let close_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7708 assert_eq!(close_ev.len(), 1);
7710 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, ref node_id } => {
7711 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7712 assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because funding transaction failed to confirm within 2016 blocks");
7714 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7719 fn test_override_channel_config() {
7720 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7721 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7722 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7723 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7725 // Node0 initiates a channel to node1 using the override config.
7726 let mut override_config = UserConfig::default();
7727 override_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 200;
7729 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 16_000_000, 12_000_000, 42, Some(override_config)).unwrap();
7731 // Assert the channel created by node0 is using the override config.
7732 let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7733 assert_eq!(res.channel_flags, 0);
7734 assert_eq!(res.to_self_delay, 200);
7738 fn test_override_0msat_htlc_minimum() {
7739 let mut zero_config = UserConfig::default();
7740 zero_config.channel_handshake_config.our_htlc_minimum_msat = 0;
7741 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7742 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7743 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(zero_config.clone())]);
7744 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7746 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 16_000_000, 12_000_000, 42, Some(zero_config)).unwrap();
7747 let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7748 assert_eq!(res.htlc_minimum_msat, 1);
7750 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
7751 let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7752 assert_eq!(res.htlc_minimum_msat, 1);
7756 fn test_channel_update_has_correct_htlc_maximum_msat() {
7757 // Tests that the `ChannelUpdate` message has the correct values for `htlc_maximum_msat` set.
7758 // Bolt 7 specifies that if present `htlc_maximum_msat`:
7759 // 1. MUST be set to less than or equal to the channel capacity. In LDK, this is capped to
7760 // 90% of the `channel_value`.
7761 // 2. MUST be set to less than or equal to the `max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat` received from the peer.
7763 let mut config_30_percent = UserConfig::default();
7764 config_30_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
7765 config_30_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 30;
7766 let mut config_50_percent = UserConfig::default();
7767 config_50_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
7768 config_50_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 50;
7769 let mut config_95_percent = UserConfig::default();
7770 config_95_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
7771 config_95_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 95;
7772 let mut config_100_percent = UserConfig::default();
7773 config_100_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
7774 config_100_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 100;
7776 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
7777 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
7778 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config_30_percent), Some(config_50_percent), Some(config_95_percent), Some(config_100_percent)]);
7779 let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7781 let channel_value_satoshis = 100000;
7782 let channel_value_msat = channel_value_satoshis * 1000;
7783 let channel_value_30_percent_msat = (channel_value_msat as f64 * 0.3) as u64;
7784 let channel_value_50_percent_msat = (channel_value_msat as f64 * 0.5) as u64;
7785 let channel_value_90_percent_msat = (channel_value_msat as f64 * 0.9) as u64;
7787 let (node_0_chan_update, node_1_chan_update, _, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value_satoshis, 10001);
7788 let (node_2_chan_update, node_3_chan_update, _, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, channel_value_satoshis, 10001);
7790 // Assert that `node[0]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 50 percent of the `channel_value`, as
7791 // that's the value of `node[1]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat`.
7792 assert_eq!(node_0_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_50_percent_msat);
7793 // Assert that `node[1]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 30 percent of the `channel_value`, as
7794 // that's the value of `node[0]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat`.
7795 assert_eq!(node_1_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_30_percent_msat);
7797 // Assert that `node[2]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 90 percent of the `channel_value`, as
7798 // the value of `node[3]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat` (100%), exceeds 90% of the
7800 assert_eq!(node_2_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_90_percent_msat);
7801 // Assert that `node[3]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 90 percent of the `channel_value`, as
7802 // the value of `node[2]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat` (95%), exceeds 90% of the
7804 assert_eq!(node_3_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_90_percent_msat);
7808 fn test_manually_accept_inbound_channel_request() {
7809 let mut manually_accept_conf = UserConfig::default();
7810 manually_accept_conf.manually_accept_inbound_channels = true;
7811 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7812 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7813 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(manually_accept_conf.clone())]);
7814 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7816 let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
7817 let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7819 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
7821 // Assert that `nodes[1]` has no `MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel` in `msg_events` before
7822 // accepting the inbound channel request.
7823 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
7825 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7827 Event::OpenChannelRequest { temporary_channel_id, .. } => {
7828 nodes[1].node.accept_inbound_channel(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 23).unwrap();
7830 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7833 let accept_msg_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7834 assert_eq!(accept_msg_ev.len(), 1);
7836 match accept_msg_ev[0] {
7837 MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel { ref node_id, .. } => {
7838 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7840 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7843 nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&temp_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
7845 let close_msg_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7846 assert_eq!(close_msg_ev.len(), 1);
7848 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7850 Event::ChannelClosed { user_channel_id, .. } => {
7851 assert_eq!(user_channel_id, 23);
7853 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7858 fn test_manually_reject_inbound_channel_request() {
7859 let mut manually_accept_conf = UserConfig::default();
7860 manually_accept_conf.manually_accept_inbound_channels = true;
7861 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7862 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7863 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(manually_accept_conf.clone())]);
7864 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7866 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
7867 let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7869 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
7871 // Assert that `nodes[1]` has no `MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel` in `msg_events` before
7872 // rejecting the inbound channel request.
7873 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
7875 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7877 Event::OpenChannelRequest { temporary_channel_id, .. } => {
7878 nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
7880 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7883 let close_msg_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7884 assert_eq!(close_msg_ev.len(), 1);
7886 match close_msg_ev[0] {
7887 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref node_id, .. } => {
7888 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7890 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7892 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
7896 fn test_reject_funding_before_inbound_channel_accepted() {
7897 // This tests that when `UserConfig::manually_accept_inbound_channels` is set to true, inbound
7898 // channels must to be manually accepted through `ChannelManager::accept_inbound_channel` by
7899 // the node operator before the counterparty sends a `FundingCreated` message. If a
7900 // `FundingCreated` message is received before the channel is accepted, it should be rejected
7901 // and the channel should be closed.
7902 let mut manually_accept_conf = UserConfig::default();
7903 manually_accept_conf.manually_accept_inbound_channels = true;
7904 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7905 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7906 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(manually_accept_conf.clone())]);
7907 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7909 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
7910 let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7911 let temp_channel_id = res.temporary_channel_id;
7913 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
7915 // Assert that `nodes[1]` has no `MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel` in the `msg_events`.
7916 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
7918 // Clear the `Event::OpenChannelRequest` event without responding to the request.
7919 nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7921 // Get the `AcceptChannel` message of `nodes[1]` without calling
7922 // `ChannelManager::accept_inbound_channel`, which generates a
7923 // `MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel` event. The message is passed to `nodes[0]`
7924 // `handle_accept_channel`, which is required in order for `create_funding_transaction` to
7925 // succeed when `nodes[0]` is passed to it.
7926 let accept_chan_msg = {
7927 let mut node_1_per_peer_lock;
7928 let mut node_1_peer_state_lock;
7929 let channel = get_channel_ref!(&nodes[1], nodes[0], node_1_per_peer_lock, node_1_peer_state_lock, temp_channel_id);
7930 channel.get_accept_channel_message()
7932 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_chan_msg);
7934 let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42);
7936 nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
7937 let funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7939 // The `funding_created_msg` should be rejected by `nodes[1]` as it hasn't accepted the channel
7940 nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msg);
7942 let close_msg_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7943 assert_eq!(close_msg_ev.len(), 1);
7945 let expected_err = "FundingCreated message received before the channel was accepted";
7946 match close_msg_ev[0] {
7947 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, ref node_id, } => {
7948 assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, temp_channel_id);
7949 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7950 assert_eq!(msg.data, expected_err);
7952 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7955 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: expected_err.to_string() });
7959 fn test_can_not_accept_inbound_channel_twice() {
7960 let mut manually_accept_conf = UserConfig::default();
7961 manually_accept_conf.manually_accept_inbound_channels = true;
7962 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7963 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7964 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(manually_accept_conf.clone())]);
7965 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7967 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
7968 let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7970 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
7972 // Assert that `nodes[1]` has no `MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel` in `msg_events` before
7973 // accepting the inbound channel request.
7974 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
7976 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7978 Event::OpenChannelRequest { temporary_channel_id, .. } => {
7979 nodes[1].node.accept_inbound_channel(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 0).unwrap();
7980 let api_res = nodes[1].node.accept_inbound_channel(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 0);
7982 Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => {
7983 assert_eq!(err, "The channel isn't currently awaiting to be accepted.");
7985 Ok(_) => panic!("Channel shouldn't be possible to be accepted twice"),
7986 Err(_) => panic!("Unexpected Error"),
7989 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7992 // Ensure that the channel wasn't closed after attempting to accept it twice.
7993 let accept_msg_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7994 assert_eq!(accept_msg_ev.len(), 1);
7996 match accept_msg_ev[0] {
7997 MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel { ref node_id, .. } => {
7998 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8000 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8005 fn test_can_not_accept_unknown_inbound_channel() {
8006 let chanmon_cfg = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8007 let node_cfg = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfg);
8008 let node_chanmgr = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfg, &[None, None]);
8009 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfg, &node_chanmgr);
8011 let unknown_channel_id = [0; 32];
8012 let api_res = nodes[0].node.accept_inbound_channel(&unknown_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 0);
8014 Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err }) => {
8015 assert_eq!(err, format!("Channel with id {} not found for the passed counterparty node_id {}", log_bytes!(unknown_channel_id), nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
8017 Ok(_) => panic!("It shouldn't be possible to accept an unkown channel"),
8018 Err(_) => panic!("Unexpected Error"),
8023 fn test_onion_value_mpp_set_calculation() {
8024 // Test that we use the onion value `amt_to_forward` when
8025 // calculating whether we've reached the `total_msat` of an MPP
8026 // by having a routing node forward more than `amt_to_forward`
8027 // and checking that the receiving node doesn't generate
8028 // a PaymentClaimable event too early
8030 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(node_count);
8031 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(node_count, &chanmon_cfgs);
8032 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(node_count, &node_cfgs, &vec![None; node_count]);
8033 let mut nodes = create_network(node_count, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8035 let chan_1_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8036 let chan_2_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8037 let chan_3_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8038 let chan_4_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8040 let total_msat = 100_000;
8041 let expected_paths: &[&[&Node]] = &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]];
8042 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(&nodes[0], nodes[3], total_msat);
8043 let sample_path = route.paths.pop().unwrap();
8045 let mut path_1 = sample_path.clone();
8046 path_1.hops[0].pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
8047 path_1.hops[0].short_channel_id = chan_1_id;
8048 path_1.hops[1].pubkey = nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id();
8049 path_1.hops[1].short_channel_id = chan_3_id;
8050 path_1.hops[1].fee_msat = 100_000;
8051 route.paths.push(path_1);
8053 let mut path_2 = sample_path.clone();
8054 path_2.hops[0].pubkey = nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id();
8055 path_2.hops[0].short_channel_id = chan_2_id;
8056 path_2.hops[1].pubkey = nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id();
8057 path_2.hops[1].short_channel_id = chan_4_id;
8058 path_2.hops[1].fee_msat = 1_000;
8059 route.paths.push(path_2);
8062 let payment_id = PaymentId(nodes[0].keys_manager.backing.get_secure_random_bytes());
8063 let onion_session_privs = nodes[0].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(our_payment_hash,
8064 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), payment_id, &route).unwrap();
8065 nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_internal(&route, our_payment_hash,
8066 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), None, payment_id, Some(total_msat), onion_session_privs).unwrap();
8067 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], expected_paths.len());
8069 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8070 assert_eq!(events.len(), expected_paths.len());
8073 let ev = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&expected_paths[0][0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
8074 let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(ev);
8075 let mut prev_node = &nodes[0];
8077 for (idx, &node) in expected_paths[0].iter().enumerate() {
8078 assert_eq!(node.node.get_our_node_id(), payment_event.node_id);
8080 if idx == 0 { // routing node
8081 let session_priv = [3; 32];
8082 let height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1;
8083 let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&session_priv).unwrap();
8084 let mut onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::new(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
8085 let (mut onion_payloads, _, _) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 100_000,
8086 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), height + 1, &None).unwrap();
8087 // Edit amt_to_forward to simulate the sender having set
8088 // the final amount and the routing node taking less fee
8089 onion_payloads[1].amt_to_forward = 99_000;
8090 let new_onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash);
8091 payment_event.msgs[0].onion_routing_packet = new_onion_packet;
8094 node.node.handle_update_add_htlc(&prev_node.node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
8095 check_added_monitors!(node, 0);
8096 commitment_signed_dance!(node, prev_node, payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
8097 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(node);
8100 let mut events_2 = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8101 assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
8102 check_added_monitors!(node, 1);
8103 payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events_2.remove(0));
8104 assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
8106 let events_2 = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
8107 assert!(events_2.is_empty());
8114 let ev = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&expected_paths[1][0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
8115 pass_along_path(&nodes[0], expected_paths[1], 101_000, our_payment_hash.clone(), Some(our_payment_secret), ev, true, None);
8117 claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], expected_paths, false, our_payment_preimage);
8120 fn do_test_overshoot_mpp(msat_amounts: &[u64], total_msat: u64) {
8122 let routing_node_count = msat_amounts.len();
8123 let node_count = routing_node_count + 2;
8125 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(node_count);
8126 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(node_count, &chanmon_cfgs);
8127 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(node_count, &node_cfgs, &vec![None; node_count]);
8128 let nodes = create_network(node_count, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8133 // Create channels for each amount
8134 let mut expected_paths = Vec::with_capacity(routing_node_count);
8135 let mut src_chan_ids = Vec::with_capacity(routing_node_count);
8136 let mut dst_chan_ids = Vec::with_capacity(routing_node_count);
8137 for i in 0..routing_node_count {
8138 let routing_node = 2 + i;
8139 let src_chan_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, src_idx, routing_node).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8140 src_chan_ids.push(src_chan_id);
8141 let dst_chan_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, routing_node, dst_idx).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8142 dst_chan_ids.push(dst_chan_id);
8143 let path = vec![&nodes[routing_node], &nodes[dst_idx]];
8144 expected_paths.push(path);
8146 let expected_paths: Vec<&[&Node]> = expected_paths.iter().map(|route| route.as_slice()).collect();
8148 // Create a route for each amount
8149 let example_amount = 100000;
8150 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(&nodes[src_idx], nodes[dst_idx], example_amount);
8151 let sample_path = route.paths.pop().unwrap();
8152 for i in 0..routing_node_count {
8153 let routing_node = 2 + i;
8154 let mut path = sample_path.clone();
8155 path.hops[0].pubkey = nodes[routing_node].node.get_our_node_id();
8156 path.hops[0].short_channel_id = src_chan_ids[i];
8157 path.hops[1].pubkey = nodes[dst_idx].node.get_our_node_id();
8158 path.hops[1].short_channel_id = dst_chan_ids[i];
8159 path.hops[1].fee_msat = msat_amounts[i];
8160 route.paths.push(path);
8163 // Send payment with manually set total_msat
8164 let payment_id = PaymentId(nodes[src_idx].keys_manager.backing.get_secure_random_bytes());
8165 let onion_session_privs = nodes[src_idx].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(our_payment_hash,
8166 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), payment_id, &route).unwrap();
8167 nodes[src_idx].node.test_send_payment_internal(&route, our_payment_hash,
8168 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), None, payment_id, Some(total_msat), onion_session_privs).unwrap();
8169 check_added_monitors!(nodes[src_idx], expected_paths.len());
8171 let mut events = nodes[src_idx].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8172 assert_eq!(events.len(), expected_paths.len());
8173 let mut amount_received = 0;
8174 for (path_idx, expected_path) in expected_paths.iter().enumerate() {
8175 let ev = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&expected_path[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
8177 let current_path_amount = msat_amounts[path_idx];
8178 amount_received += current_path_amount;
8179 let became_claimable_now = amount_received >= total_msat && amount_received - current_path_amount < total_msat;
8180 pass_along_path(&nodes[src_idx], expected_path, amount_received, our_payment_hash.clone(), Some(our_payment_secret), ev, became_claimable_now, None);
8183 claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[src_idx], &expected_paths, false, our_payment_preimage);
8187 fn test_overshoot_mpp() {
8188 do_test_overshoot_mpp(&[100_000, 101_000], 200_000);
8189 do_test_overshoot_mpp(&[100_000, 10_000, 100_000], 200_000);
8193 fn test_simple_mpp() {
8194 // Simple test of sending a multi-path payment.
8195 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
8196 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
8197 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
8198 let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8200 let chan_1_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8201 let chan_2_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8202 let chan_3_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8203 let chan_4_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8205 let (mut route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(&nodes[0], nodes[3], 100000);
8206 let path = route.paths[0].clone();
8207 route.paths.push(path);
8208 route.paths[0].hops[0].pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
8209 route.paths[0].hops[0].short_channel_id = chan_1_id;
8210 route.paths[0].hops[1].short_channel_id = chan_3_id;
8211 route.paths[1].hops[0].pubkey = nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id();
8212 route.paths[1].hops[0].short_channel_id = chan_2_id;
8213 route.paths[1].hops[1].short_channel_id = chan_4_id;
8214 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[0], route, &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], 200_000, payment_hash, payment_secret);
8215 claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, payment_preimage);
8219 fn test_preimage_storage() {
8220 // Simple test of payment preimage storage allowing no client-side storage to claim payments
8221 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8222 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8223 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8224 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8226 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8229 let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 7200, None).unwrap();
8230 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000);
8231 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
8232 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
8233 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
8234 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8235 let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
8236 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
8237 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
8239 // Note that after leaving the above scope we have no knowledge of any arguments or return
8240 // values from previous calls.
8241 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
8242 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
8243 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8245 Event::PaymentClaimable { ref purpose, .. } => {
8247 PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, .. } => {
8248 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage.unwrap());
8250 _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
8253 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8258 #[allow(deprecated)]
8259 fn test_secret_timeout() {
8260 // Simple test of payment secret storage time outs. After
8261 // `create_inbound_payment(_for_hash)_legacy` is removed, this test will be removed as well.
8262 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8263 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8264 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8265 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8267 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8269 let (payment_hash, payment_secret_1) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_legacy(Some(100_000), 2).unwrap();
8271 // We should fail to register the same payment hash twice, at least until we've connected a
8272 // block with time 7200 + CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1.
8273 if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash_legacy(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2) {
8274 assert_eq!(err, "Duplicate payment hash");
8275 } else { panic!(); }
8277 let node_1_blocks = nodes[1].blocks.lock().unwrap();
8279 header: BlockHeader {
8281 prev_blockhash: node_1_blocks.last().unwrap().0.block_hash(),
8282 merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(),
8283 time: node_1_blocks.len() as u32 + 7200, bits: 42, nonce: 42 },
8287 connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
8288 if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash_legacy(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2) {
8289 assert_eq!(err, "Duplicate payment hash");
8290 } else { panic!(); }
8292 // If we then connect the second block, we should be able to register the same payment hash
8293 // again (this time getting a new payment secret).
8294 block.header.prev_blockhash = block.header.block_hash();
8295 block.header.time += 1;
8296 connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
8297 let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash_legacy(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2).unwrap();
8298 assert_ne!(payment_secret_1, our_payment_secret);
8301 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000);
8302 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
8303 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
8304 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
8305 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8306 let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
8307 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
8308 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
8310 // Note that after leaving the above scope we have no knowledge of any arguments or return
8311 // values from previous calls.
8312 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
8313 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
8314 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8316 Event::PaymentClaimable { purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret }, .. } => {
8317 assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
8318 assert_eq!(payment_secret, our_payment_secret);
8319 // We don't actually have the payment preimage with which to claim this payment!
8321 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8326 fn test_bad_secret_hash() {
8327 // Simple test of unregistered payment hash/invalid payment secret handling
8328 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8329 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8330 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8331 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8333 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8335 let random_payment_hash = PaymentHash([42; 32]);
8336 let random_payment_secret = PaymentSecret([43; 32]);
8337 let (our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2, None).unwrap();
8338 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000);
8340 // All the below cases should end up being handled exactly identically, so we macro the
8341 // resulting events.
8342 macro_rules! handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data {
8343 ($payment_hash: expr) => {
8344 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
8345 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8346 let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
8347 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
8348 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
8350 // We have to forward pending HTLCs once to process the receipt of the HTLC and then
8351 // again to process the pending backwards-failure of the HTLC
8352 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
8353 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment{ payment_hash: $payment_hash }]);
8354 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
8356 // We should fail the payment back
8357 let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8358 match events.pop().unwrap() {
8359 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_fail_htlcs, commitment_signed, .. } } => {
8360 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[0]);
8361 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false);
8363 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8368 let expected_error_code = 0x4000|15; // incorrect_or_unknown_payment_details
8369 // Error data is the HTLC value (100,000) and current block height
8370 let expected_error_data = [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0x86, 0xa0, 0, 0, 0, CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH as u8];
8372 // Send a payment with the right payment hash but the wrong payment secret
8373 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
8374 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(random_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
8375 handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!(our_payment_hash);
8376 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
8378 // Send a payment with a random payment hash, but the right payment secret
8379 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, random_payment_hash,
8380 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(random_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
8381 handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!(random_payment_hash);
8382 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], random_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
8384 // Send a payment with a random payment hash and random payment secret
8385 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, random_payment_hash,
8386 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(random_payment_secret), PaymentId(random_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
8387 handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!(random_payment_hash);
8388 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], random_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
8392 fn test_update_err_monitor_lockdown() {
8393 // Our monitor will lock update of local commitment transaction if a broadcastion condition
8394 // has been fulfilled (either force-close from Channel or block height requiring a HTLC-
8395 // timeout). Trying to update monitor after lockdown should return a ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus
8398 // This scenario may happen in a watchtower setup, where watchtower process a block height
8399 // triggering a timeout while a slow-block-processing ChannelManager receives a local signed
8400 // commitment at same time.
8402 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8403 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8404 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8405 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8407 // Create some initial channel
8408 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
8409 let outpoint = OutPoint { txid: chan_1.3.txid(), index: 0 };
8411 // Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
8412 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 10_000_000);
8414 // Route a HTLC from node 0 to node 1 (but don't settle)
8415 let (preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 9_000_000);
8417 // Copy ChainMonitor to simulate a watchtower and update block height of node 0 until its ChannelMonitor timeout HTLC onchain
8418 let chain_source = test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet);
8419 let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::with_id(format!("node {}", 0));
8420 let persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
8423 let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(outpoint).unwrap();
8424 let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<EnforcingSigner>)>::read(
8425 &mut io::Cursor::new(&monitor.encode()), (nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[0].keys_manager)).unwrap().1;
8426 assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
8429 let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &persister, &node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
8430 assert_eq!(watchtower.watch_channel(outpoint, new_monitor), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
8433 let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: BlockHash::all_zeros(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
8434 let block = Block { header, txdata: vec![] };
8435 // Make the tx_broadcaster aware of enough blocks that it doesn't think we're violating
8436 // transaction lock time requirements here.
8437 chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster.blocks.lock().unwrap().resize(200, (block.clone(), 200));
8438 watchtower.chain_monitor.block_connected(&block, 200);
8440 // Try to update ChannelMonitor
8441 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(preimage);
8442 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
8443 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 9_000_000);
8445 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8446 assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
8447 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
8449 let mut node_0_per_peer_lock;
8450 let mut node_0_peer_state_lock;
8451 let mut channel = get_channel_ref!(nodes[0], nodes[1], node_0_per_peer_lock, node_0_peer_state_lock, chan_1.2);
8452 if let Ok(update) = channel.commitment_signed(&updates.commitment_signed, &node_cfgs[0].logger) {
8453 assert_eq!(watchtower.chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure);
8454 assert_eq!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
8455 } else { assert!(false); }
8457 // Our local monitor is in-sync and hasn't processed yet timeout
8458 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
8459 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
8460 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8464 fn test_concurrent_monitor_claim() {
8465 // Watchtower A receives block, broadcasts state N, then channel receives new state N+1,
8466 // sending it to both watchtowers, Bob accepts N+1, then receives block and broadcasts
8467 // the latest state N+1, Alice rejects state N+1, but Bob has already broadcast it,
8468 // state N+1 confirms. Alice claims output from state N+1.
8470 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8471 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8472 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8473 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8475 // Create some initial channel
8476 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
8477 let outpoint = OutPoint { txid: chan_1.3.txid(), index: 0 };
8479 // Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
8480 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 10_000_000);
8482 // Route a HTLC from node 0 to node 1 (but don't settle)
8483 route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9_000_000).0;
8485 // Copy ChainMonitor to simulate watchtower Alice and update block height her ChannelMonitor timeout HTLC onchain
8486 let chain_source = test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet);
8487 let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::with_id(format!("node {}", "Alice"));
8488 let persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
8489 let alice_broadcaster = test_utils::TestBroadcaster::with_blocks(
8490 Arc::new(Mutex::new(nodes[0].blocks.lock().unwrap().clone())),
8492 let watchtower_alice = {
8494 let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(outpoint).unwrap();
8495 let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<EnforcingSigner>)>::read(
8496 &mut io::Cursor::new(&monitor.encode()), (nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[0].keys_manager)).unwrap().1;
8497 assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
8500 let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &alice_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &persister, &node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
8501 assert_eq!(watchtower.watch_channel(outpoint, new_monitor), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
8504 let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: BlockHash::all_zeros(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
8505 let block = Block { header, txdata: vec![] };
8506 // Make Alice aware of enough blocks that it doesn't think we're violating transaction lock time
8507 // requirements here.
8508 const HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST: u32 = CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS;
8509 alice_broadcaster.blocks.lock().unwrap().resize((HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST) as usize, (block.clone(), HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST));
8510 watchtower_alice.chain_monitor.block_connected(&block, HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST);
8512 // Watchtower Alice should have broadcast a commitment/HTLC-timeout
8514 let mut txn = alice_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
8515 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 2);
8519 // Copy ChainMonitor to simulate watchtower Bob and make it receive a commitment update first.
8520 let chain_source = test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet);
8521 let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::with_id(format!("node {}", "Bob"));
8522 let persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
8523 let bob_broadcaster = test_utils::TestBroadcaster::with_blocks(Arc::clone(&alice_broadcaster.blocks));
8524 let watchtower_bob = {
8526 let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(outpoint).unwrap();
8527 let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<EnforcingSigner>)>::read(
8528 &mut io::Cursor::new(&monitor.encode()), (nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[0].keys_manager)).unwrap().1;
8529 assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
8532 let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &bob_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &persister, &node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
8533 assert_eq!(watchtower.watch_channel(outpoint, new_monitor), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
8536 let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: BlockHash::all_zeros(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
8537 watchtower_bob.chain_monitor.block_connected(&Block { header, txdata: vec![] }, HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST - 1);
8539 // Route another payment to generate another update with still previous HTLC pending
8540 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 3000000);
8541 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
8542 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
8543 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
8545 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8546 assert_eq!(updates.update_add_htlcs.len(), 1);
8547 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
8549 let mut node_0_per_peer_lock;
8550 let mut node_0_peer_state_lock;
8551 let mut channel = get_channel_ref!(nodes[0], nodes[1], node_0_per_peer_lock, node_0_peer_state_lock, chan_1.2);
8552 if let Ok(update) = channel.commitment_signed(&updates.commitment_signed, &node_cfgs[0].logger) {
8553 // Watchtower Alice should already have seen the block and reject the update
8554 assert_eq!(watchtower_alice.chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure);
8555 assert_eq!(watchtower_bob.chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
8556 assert_eq!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
8557 } else { assert!(false); }
8559 // Our local monitor is in-sync and hasn't processed yet timeout
8560 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
8562 //// Provide one more block to watchtower Bob, expect broadcast of commitment and HTLC-Timeout
8563 let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: BlockHash::all_zeros(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
8564 watchtower_bob.chain_monitor.block_connected(&Block { header, txdata: vec![] }, HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST);
8566 // Watchtower Bob should have broadcast a commitment/HTLC-timeout
8569 let mut txn = bob_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
8570 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 2);
8571 bob_state_y = txn.remove(0);
8574 // We confirm Bob's state Y on Alice, she should broadcast a HTLC-timeout
8575 let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: BlockHash::all_zeros(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
8576 let height = HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST + 1;
8577 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
8578 check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[0], 1, true);
8579 check_closed_event(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, false);
8580 watchtower_alice.chain_monitor.block_connected(&Block { header, txdata: vec![bob_state_y.clone()] }, height);
8581 check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
8583 let htlc_txn = alice_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
8584 assert_eq!(htlc_txn.len(), 2);
8585 check_spends!(htlc_txn[0], bob_state_y);
8586 // Alice doesn't clean up the old HTLC claim since it hasn't seen a conflicting spend for
8587 // it. However, she should, because it now has an invalid parent.
8588 check_spends!(htlc_txn[1], alice_state);
8593 fn test_pre_lockin_no_chan_closed_update() {
8594 // Test that if a peer closes a channel in response to a funding_created message we don't
8595 // generate a channel update (as the channel cannot appear on chain without a funding_signed
8598 // Doing so would imply a channel monitor update before the initial channel monitor
8599 // registration, violating our API guarantees.
8601 // Previously, full_stack_target managed to hit this case by opening then closing a channel,
8602 // then opening a second channel with the same funding output as the first (which is not
8603 // rejected because the first channel does not exist in the ChannelManager) and closing it
8604 // before receiving funding_signed.
8605 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8606 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8607 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8608 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8610 // Create an initial channel
8611 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
8612 let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8613 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
8614 let accept_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8615 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_chan_msg);
8617 // Move the first channel through the funding flow...
8618 let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42);
8620 nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
8621 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
8623 let funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8624 let channel_id = crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index }.to_channel_id();
8625 nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id, data: "Hi".to_owned() });
8626 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
8627 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 2, ClosureReason::CounterpartyForceClosed { peer_msg: UntrustedString("Hi".to_string()) }, true);
8631 fn test_htlc_no_detection() {
8632 // This test is a mutation to underscore the detection logic bug we had
8633 // before #653. HTLC value routed is above the remaining balance, thus
8634 // inverting HTLC and `to_remote` output. HTLC will come second and
8635 // it wouldn't be seen by pre-#653 detection as we were enumerate()'ing
8636 // on a watched outputs vector (Vec<TxOut>) thus implicitly relying on
8637 // outputs order detection for correct spending children filtring.
8639 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8640 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8641 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8642 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8644 // Create some initial channels
8645 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
8647 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 1_000_000);
8648 let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 2_000_000);
8649 let local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
8650 assert_eq!(local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
8651 assert_eq!(local_txn[0].output.len(), 3);
8652 check_spends!(local_txn[0], chan_1.3);
8654 // Timeout HTLC on A's chain and so it can generate a HTLC-Timeout tx
8655 let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[0].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
8656 connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header, txdata: vec![local_txn[0].clone()] });
8657 // We deliberately connect the local tx twice as this should provoke a failure calling
8658 // this test before #653 fix.
8659 chain::Listen::block_connected(&nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor, &Block { header, txdata: vec![local_txn[0].clone()] }, nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1);
8660 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
8661 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
8662 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
8663 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV);
8665 let htlc_timeout = {
8666 let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
8667 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
8668 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
8669 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
8670 check_spends!(node_txn[0], local_txn[0]);
8674 let header_201 = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[0].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
8675 connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header: header_201, txdata: vec![htlc_timeout.clone()] });
8676 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
8677 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false);
8680 fn do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(broadcast_alice: bool, go_onchain_before_fulfill: bool) {
8681 // If we route an HTLC, then learn the HTLC's preimage after the upstream channel has been
8682 // force-closed, we must claim that HTLC on-chain. (Given an HTLC forwarded from Alice --> Bob -->
8683 // Carol, Alice would be the upstream node, and Carol the downstream.)
8685 // Steps of the test:
8686 // 1) Alice sends a HTLC to Carol through Bob.
8687 // 2) Carol doesn't settle the HTLC.
8688 // 3) If broadcast_alice is true, Alice force-closes her channel with Bob. Else Bob force closes.
8689 // Steps 4 and 5 may be reordered depending on go_onchain_before_fulfill.
8690 // 4) Bob sees the Alice's commitment on his chain or vice versa. An offered output is present
8691 // but can't be claimed as Bob doesn't have yet knowledge of the preimage.
8692 // 5) Carol release the preimage to Bob off-chain.
8693 // 6) Bob claims the offered output on the broadcasted commitment.
8694 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
8695 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
8696 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
8697 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8699 // Create some initial channels
8700 let chan_ab = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
8701 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 100000, 10001);
8703 // Steps (1) and (2):
8704 // Send an HTLC Alice --> Bob --> Carol, but Carol doesn't settle the HTLC back.
8705 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3_000_000);
8707 // Check that Alice's commitment transaction now contains an output for this HTLC.
8708 let alice_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_ab.2);
8709 check_spends!(alice_txn[0], chan_ab.3);
8710 assert_eq!(alice_txn[0].output.len(), 2);
8711 check_spends!(alice_txn[1], alice_txn[0]); // 2nd transaction is a non-final HTLC-timeout
8712 assert_eq!(alice_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
8713 assert_eq!(alice_txn.len(), 2);
8715 // Steps (3) and (4):
8716 // If `go_onchain_before_fufill`, broadcast the relevant commitment transaction and check that Bob
8717 // responds by (1) broadcasting a channel update and (2) adding a new ChannelMonitor.
8718 let mut force_closing_node = 0; // Alice force-closes
8719 let mut counterparty_node = 1; // Bob if Alice force-closes
8722 if !broadcast_alice {
8723 force_closing_node = 1;
8724 counterparty_node = 0;
8726 nodes[force_closing_node].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_ab.2, &nodes[counterparty_node].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
8727 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[force_closing_node], true);
8728 check_added_monitors!(nodes[force_closing_node], 1);
8729 check_closed_event!(nodes[force_closing_node], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
8730 if go_onchain_before_fulfill {
8731 let txn_to_broadcast = match broadcast_alice {
8732 true => alice_txn.clone(),
8733 false => get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_ab.2)
8735 let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[1].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42};
8736 connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![txn_to_broadcast[0].clone()]});
8737 if broadcast_alice {
8738 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
8739 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
8740 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
8745 // Carol then claims the funds and sends an update_fulfill message to Bob, and they go through the
8746 // process of removing the HTLC from their commitment transactions.
8747 nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
8748 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
8749 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], payment_hash, 3_000_000);
8751 let carol_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8752 assert!(carol_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
8753 assert!(carol_updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
8754 assert!(carol_updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
8755 assert!(carol_updates.update_fee.is_none());
8756 assert_eq!(carol_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
8758 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
8759 expect_payment_forwarded!(nodes[1], nodes[0], nodes[2], if go_onchain_before_fulfill || force_closing_node == 1 { None } else { Some(1000) }, false, false);
8760 // If Alice broadcasted but Bob doesn't know yet, here he prepares to tell her about the preimage.
8761 if !go_onchain_before_fulfill && broadcast_alice {
8762 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8763 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8765 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, .. } => {
8766 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8768 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8771 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_updates.commitment_signed);
8772 // One monitor update for the preimage to update the Bob<->Alice channel, one monitor update
8773 // Carol<->Bob's updated commitment transaction info.
8774 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
8776 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8777 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
8778 let bob_revocation = match events[0] {
8779 MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
8780 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
8783 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8785 let bob_updates = match events[1] {
8786 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, ref updates } => {
8787 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
8790 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8793 nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_revocation);
8794 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
8795 nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_updates.commitment_signed);
8796 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
8798 let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8799 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8800 let carol_revocation = match events[0] {
8801 MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
8802 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8805 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8807 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_revocation);
8808 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
8810 // If this test requires the force-closed channel to not be on-chain until after the fulfill,
8811 // here's where we put said channel's commitment tx on-chain.
8812 let mut txn_to_broadcast = alice_txn.clone();
8813 if !broadcast_alice { txn_to_broadcast = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_ab.2); }
8814 if !go_onchain_before_fulfill {
8815 let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[1].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42};
8816 connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![txn_to_broadcast[0].clone()]});
8817 // If Bob was the one to force-close, he will have already passed these checks earlier.
8818 if broadcast_alice {
8819 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
8820 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
8821 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
8823 let mut bob_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
8824 if broadcast_alice {
8825 assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 1);
8826 check_spends!(bob_txn[0], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
8828 assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 2);
8829 check_spends!(bob_txn[0], chan_ab.3);
8834 // Finally, check that Bob broadcasted a preimage-claiming transaction for the HTLC output on the
8835 // broadcasted commitment transaction.
8837 let script_weight = match broadcast_alice {
8838 true => OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT,
8839 false => ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT
8841 // If Alice force-closed, Bob only broadcasts a HTLC-output-claiming transaction. Otherwise,
8842 // Bob force-closed and broadcasts the commitment transaction along with a
8843 // HTLC-output-claiming transaction.
8844 let bob_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
8845 if broadcast_alice {
8846 assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 1);
8847 check_spends!(bob_txn[0], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
8848 assert_eq!(bob_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), script_weight);
8850 assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 2);
8851 check_spends!(bob_txn[1], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
8852 assert_eq!(bob_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), script_weight);
8858 fn test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close() {
8859 do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(true, true);
8860 do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(false, true); // Technically redundant, but may as well
8861 do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(true, false);
8862 do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(false, false);
8866 fn test_duplicate_temporary_channel_id_from_different_peers() {
8867 // Tests that we can accept two different `OpenChannel` requests with the same
8868 // `temporary_channel_id`, as long as they are from different peers.
8869 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
8870 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
8871 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
8872 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8874 // Create an first channel channel
8875 nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
8876 let mut open_chan_msg_chan_1_0 = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8878 // Create an second channel
8879 nodes[2].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 43, None).unwrap();
8880 let mut open_chan_msg_chan_2_0 = get_event_msg!(nodes[2], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8882 // Modify the `OpenChannel` from `nodes[2]` to `nodes[0]` to ensure that it uses the same
8883 // `temporary_channel_id` as the `OpenChannel` from nodes[1] to nodes[0].
8884 open_chan_msg_chan_2_0.temporary_channel_id = open_chan_msg_chan_1_0.temporary_channel_id;
8886 // Assert that `nodes[0]` can accept both `OpenChannel` requests, even though they use the same
8887 // `temporary_channel_id` as they are from different peers.
8888 nodes[0].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg_chan_1_0);
8890 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8891 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8893 MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel { node_id, msg } => {
8894 assert_eq!(node_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8895 assert_eq!(msg.temporary_channel_id, open_chan_msg_chan_1_0.temporary_channel_id);
8897 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8901 nodes[0].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg_chan_2_0);
8903 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8904 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8906 MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel { node_id, msg } => {
8907 assert_eq!(node_id, &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
8908 assert_eq!(msg.temporary_channel_id, open_chan_msg_chan_1_0.temporary_channel_id);
8910 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8916 fn test_duplicate_chan_id() {
8917 // Test that if a given peer tries to open a channel with the same channel_id as one that is
8918 // already open we reject it and keep the old channel.
8920 // Previously, full_stack_target managed to figure out that if you tried to open two channels
8921 // with the same funding output (ie post-funding channel_id), we'd create a monitor update for
8922 // the existing channel when we detect the duplicate new channel, screwing up our monitor
8923 // updating logic for the existing channel.
8924 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8925 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8926 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8927 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8929 // Create an initial channel
8930 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
8931 let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8932 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
8933 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
8935 // Try to create a second channel with the same temporary_channel_id as the first and check
8936 // that it is rejected.
8937 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
8939 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8940 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8942 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
8943 // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both the
8944 // first (valid) and second (invalid) channels are closed, given they both have
8945 // the same non-temporary channel_id. However, currently we do not, so we just
8946 // move forward with it.
8947 assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id);
8948 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8950 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8954 // Move the first channel through the funding flow...
8955 let (temporary_channel_id, tx, funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42);
8957 nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
8958 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
8960 let mut funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8961 nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msg);
8963 let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
8964 assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
8965 assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
8966 added_monitors.clear();
8968 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8970 let funding_signed_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8972 let funding_outpoint = crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index };
8973 let channel_id = funding_outpoint.to_channel_id();
8975 // Now we have the first channel past funding_created (ie it has a txid-based channel_id, not a
8978 // First try to open a second channel with a temporary channel id equal to the txid-based one.
8979 // Technically this is allowed by the spec, but we don't support it and there's little reason
8980 // to. Still, it shouldn't cause any other issues.
8981 open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id = channel_id;
8982 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
8984 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8985 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8987 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
8988 // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both
8989 // channels are closed, but currently we do not, so we just move forward with it.
8990 assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id);
8991 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8993 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8997 // Now try to create a second channel which has a duplicate funding output.
8998 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
8999 let open_chan_2_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9000 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_2_msg);
9001 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
9002 create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42); // Get and check the FundingGenerationReady event
9004 let funding_created = {
9005 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
9006 let mut a_peer_state = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
9007 // Once we call `get_outbound_funding_created` the channel has a duplicate channel_id as
9008 // another channel in the ChannelManager - an invalid state. Thus, we'd panic later when we
9009 // try to create another channel. Instead, we drop the channel entirely here (leaving the
9010 // channelmanager in a possibly nonsense state instead).
9011 let mut as_chan = a_peer_state.channel_by_id.remove(&open_chan_2_msg.temporary_channel_id).unwrap();
9012 let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
9013 as_chan.get_outbound_funding_created(tx.clone(), funding_outpoint, &&logger).unwrap()
9015 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
9016 nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created);
9017 // At this point we'll look up if the channel_id is present and immediately fail the channel
9018 // without trying to persist the `ChannelMonitor`.
9019 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
9021 // ...still, nodes[1] will reject the duplicate channel.
9023 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9024 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9026 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
9027 // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both
9028 // channels are closed, but currently we do not, so we just move forward with it.
9029 assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, channel_id);
9030 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9032 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
9036 // finally, finish creating the original channel and send a payment over it to make sure
9037 // everything is functional.
9038 nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed_msg);
9040 let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
9041 assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
9042 assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
9043 added_monitors.clear();
9045 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9047 let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
9048 assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 0);
9049 assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 1);
9050 assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap()[0], tx);
9052 let (channel_ready, _) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx);
9053 let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &channel_ready);
9054 update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update);
9056 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8000000);
9060 fn test_error_chans_closed() {
9061 // Test that we properly handle error messages, closing appropriate channels.
9063 // Prior to #787 we'd allow a peer to make us force-close a channel we had with a different
9064 // peer. The "real" fix for that is to index channels with peers_ids, however in the mean time
9065 // we can test various edge cases around it to ensure we don't regress.
9066 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
9067 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
9068 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
9069 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9071 // Create some initial channels
9072 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
9073 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
9074 let chan_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 2, 100000, 10001);
9076 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 3);
9077 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 2);
9078 assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 1);
9080 // Closing a channel from a different peer has no effect
9081 nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: chan_3.2, data: "ERR".to_owned() });
9082 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 3);
9084 // Closing one channel doesn't impact others
9085 nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: chan_2.2, data: "ERR".to_owned() });
9086 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9087 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], false);
9088 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CounterpartyForceClosed { peer_msg: UntrustedString("ERR".to_string()) });
9089 assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0).len(), 1);
9090 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 2);
9091 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[0].channel_id == chan_1.2 || nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[1].channel_id == chan_1.2);
9092 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[0].channel_id == chan_3.2 || nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[1].channel_id == chan_3.2);
9094 // A null channel ID should close all channels
9095 let _chan_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
9096 nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: [0; 32], data: "ERR".to_owned() });
9097 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 2);
9098 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 2, ClosureReason::CounterpartyForceClosed { peer_msg: UntrustedString("ERR".to_string()) });
9099 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9100 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
9102 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
9103 assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & 2, 2);
9105 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
9108 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
9109 assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & 2, 2);
9111 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
9113 // Note that at this point users of a standard PeerHandler will end up calling
9114 // peer_disconnected.
9115 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 1);
9116 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[0].channel_id == chan_3.2);
9118 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9119 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 1);
9120 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[0].channel_id == chan_3.2);
9124 fn test_invalid_funding_tx() {
9125 // Test that we properly handle invalid funding transactions sent to us from a peer.
9127 // Previously, all other major lightning implementations had failed to properly sanitize
9128 // funding transactions from their counterparties, leading to a multi-implementation critical
9129 // security vulnerability (though we always sanitized properly, we've previously had
9130 // un-released crashes in the sanitization process).
9132 // Further, if the funding transaction is consensus-valid, confirms, and is later spent, we'd
9133 // previously have crashed in `ChannelMonitor` even though we closed the channel as bogus and
9134 // gave up on it. We test this here by generating such a transaction.
9135 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9136 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9137 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
9138 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9140 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 10_000, 42, None).unwrap();
9141 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
9142 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
9144 let (temporary_channel_id, mut tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 42);
9146 // Create a witness program which can be spent by a 4-empty-stack-elements witness and which is
9147 // 136 bytes long. This matches our "accepted HTLC preimage spend" matching, previously causing
9148 // a panic as we'd try to extract a 32 byte preimage from a witness element without checking
9150 let mut wit_program: Vec<u8> = channelmonitor::deliberately_bogus_accepted_htlc_witness_program();
9151 let wit_program_script: Script = wit_program.into();
9152 for output in tx.output.iter_mut() {
9153 // Make the confirmed funding transaction have a bogus script_pubkey
9154 output.script_pubkey = Script::new_v0_p2wsh(&wit_program_script.wscript_hash());
9157 nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated_unchecked(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone(), 0).unwrap();
9158 nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
9159 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9160 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9162 nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
9163 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9164 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9166 let events_1 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
9167 assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 0);
9169 assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 1);
9170 assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap()[0], tx);
9171 nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clear();
9173 let expected_err = "funding tx had wrong script/value or output index";
9174 confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[1], &tx, 1);
9175 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: expected_err.to_string() });
9176 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9177 let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9178 assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
9179 if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { node_id, action } = &events_2[0] {
9180 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9181 if let msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { msg } = action {
9182 assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because of an exception: ".to_owned() + expected_err);
9183 } else { panic!(); }
9184 } else { panic!(); }
9185 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
9187 // Now confirm a spend of the (bogus) funding transaction. As long as the witness is 5 elements
9188 // long the ChannelMonitor will try to read 32 bytes from the second-to-last element, panicing
9189 // as its not 32 bytes long.
9190 let mut spend_tx = Transaction {
9191 version: 2i32, lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO,
9192 input: tx.output.iter().enumerate().map(|(idx, _)| TxIn {
9193 previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint {
9197 script_sig: Script::new(),
9198 sequence: Sequence::ENABLE_RBF_NO_LOCKTIME,
9199 witness: Witness::from_vec(channelmonitor::deliberately_bogus_accepted_htlc_witness())
9201 output: vec![TxOut {
9203 script_pubkey: Script::new(),
9206 check_spends!(spend_tx, tx);
9207 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &spend_tx);
9210 fn do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(test_height_before_timelock: bool) {
9211 // In the first version of the chain::Confirm interface, after a refactor was made to not
9212 // broadcast CSV-locked transactions until their CSV lock is up, we wouldn't reliably broadcast
9213 // transactions after a `transactions_confirmed` call. Specifically, if the chain, provided via
9214 // `best_block_updated` is at height N, and a transaction output which we wish to spend at
9215 // height N-1 (due to a CSV to height N-1) is provided at height N, we will not broadcast the
9216 // spending transaction until height N+1 (or greater). This was due to the way
9217 // `ChannelMonitor::transactions_confirmed` worked, only checking if we should broadcast a
9218 // spending transaction at the height the input transaction was confirmed at, not whether we
9219 // should broadcast a spending transaction at the current height.
9220 // A second, similar, issue involved failing HTLCs backwards - because we only provided the
9221 // height at which transactions were confirmed to `OnchainTx::update_claims_view`, it wasn't
9222 // aware that the anti-reorg-delay had, in fact, already expired, waiting to fail-backwards
9223 // until we learned about an additional block.
9225 // As an additional check, if `test_height_before_timelock` is set, we instead test that we
9226 // aren't broadcasting transactions too early (ie not broadcasting them at all).
9227 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
9228 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
9229 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
9230 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9231 *nodes[0].connect_style.borrow_mut() = ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstSkippingBlocks;
9233 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
9234 let (chan_announce, _, channel_id, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
9235 let (_, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1_000_000);
9236 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
9237 nodes[2].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9239 nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&channel_id, &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
9240 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
9241 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
9242 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9243 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
9244 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
9246 let conf_height = nodes[1].best_block_info().1;
9247 if !test_height_before_timelock {
9248 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 24 * 6);
9250 nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.transactions_confirmed(
9251 &nodes[1].get_block_header(conf_height), &[(0, &node_txn[0])], conf_height);
9252 if test_height_before_timelock {
9253 // If we confirmed the close transaction, but timelocks have not yet expired, we should not
9254 // generate any events or broadcast any transactions
9255 assert!(nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
9256 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
9258 // We should broadcast an HTLC transaction spending our funding transaction first
9259 let spending_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
9260 assert_eq!(spending_txn.len(), 2);
9261 assert_eq!(spending_txn[0].txid(), node_txn[0].txid());
9262 check_spends!(spending_txn[1], node_txn[0]);
9263 // We should also generate a SpendableOutputs event with the to_self output (as its
9265 let descriptor_spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
9266 assert_eq!(descriptor_spend_txn.len(), 1);
9268 // If we also discover that the HTLC-Timeout transaction was confirmed some time ago, we
9269 // should immediately fail-backwards the HTLC to the previous hop, without waiting for an
9270 // additional block built on top of the current chain.
9271 nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.transactions_confirmed(
9272 &nodes[1].get_block_header(conf_height + 1), &[(0, &spending_txn[1])], conf_height + 1);
9273 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: channel_id }]);
9274 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9276 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9277 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
9278 assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
9279 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
9280 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
9281 assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
9282 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
9283 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], updates.commitment_signed, true, true);
9284 expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false, chan_announce.contents.short_channel_id, true);
9289 fn test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast() {
9290 do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(false);
9291 do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(true);
9294 fn do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(test_for_second_fail_panic: bool) {
9295 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9296 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9297 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
9298 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9300 let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
9302 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
9303 .with_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features());
9304 let route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, 10_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
9306 let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[1]);
9309 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
9310 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
9311 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9312 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9313 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9314 let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
9315 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
9316 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
9318 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
9319 expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, 10_000);
9322 // Note that we use a different PaymentId here to allow us to duplicativly pay
9323 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
9324 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_secret.0)).unwrap();
9325 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9326 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9327 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9328 let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
9329 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
9330 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
9331 // At this point, nodes[1] would notice it has too much value for the payment. It will
9332 // assume the second is a privacy attack (no longer particularly relevant
9333 // post-payment_secrets) and fail back the new HTLC. Previously, it'd also have failed back
9334 // the first HTLC delivered above.
9337 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]);
9338 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
9340 if test_for_second_fail_panic {
9341 // Now we go fail back the first HTLC from the user end.
9342 nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash);
9344 let expected_destinations = vec![
9345 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash },
9346 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash },
9348 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[1], expected_destinations);
9349 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
9351 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9352 let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9353 assert_eq!(fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 2);
9355 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
9356 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
9357 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
9359 let failure_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
9360 assert_eq!(failure_events.len(), 4);
9361 if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[0] {} else { panic!(); }
9362 if let Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = failure_events[1] {} else { panic!(); }
9363 if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[2] {} else { panic!(); }
9364 if let Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = failure_events[3] {} else { panic!(); }
9366 // Let the second HTLC fail and claim the first
9367 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
9368 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
9370 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9371 let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9372 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
9373 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
9375 expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
9377 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage);
9382 fn test_dup_htlc_second_fail_panic() {
9383 // Previously, if we received two HTLCs back-to-back, where the second overran the expected
9384 // value for the payment, we'd fail back both HTLCs after generating a `PaymentClaimable` event.
9385 // Then, if the user failed the second payment, they'd hit a "tried to fail an already failed
9386 // HTLC" debug panic. This tests for this behavior, checking that only one HTLC is auto-failed.
9387 do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(true);
9391 fn test_dup_htlc_second_rejected() {
9392 // Test that if we receive a second HTLC for an MPP payment that overruns the payment amount we
9393 // simply reject the second HTLC but are still able to claim the first HTLC.
9394 do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(false);
9398 fn test_inconsistent_mpp_params() {
9399 // Test that if we recieve two HTLCs with different payment parameters we fail back the first
9400 // such HTLC and allow the second to stay.
9401 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
9402 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
9403 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
9404 let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9406 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 0);
9407 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 2, 100_000, 0);
9408 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 3, 100_000, 0);
9409 let chan_2_3 =create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, 100_000, 0);
9411 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
9412 .with_features(nodes[3].node.invoice_features());
9413 let mut route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, 15_000_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
9414 assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
9415 route.paths.sort_by(|path_a, _| {
9416 // Sort the path so that the path through nodes[1] comes first
9417 if path_a.hops[0].pubkey == nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id() {
9418 core::cmp::Ordering::Less } else { core::cmp::Ordering::Greater }
9421 let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[3]);
9423 let cur_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1;
9424 let payment_id = PaymentId([42; 32]);
9426 let session_privs = {
9427 // We create a fake route here so that we start with three pending HTLCs, which we'll
9428 // ultimately have, just not right away.
9429 let mut dup_route = route.clone();
9430 dup_route.paths.push(route.paths[1].clone());
9431 nodes[0].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(our_payment_hash,
9432 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), payment_id, &dup_route).unwrap()
9434 nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &our_payment_hash,
9435 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), 15_000_000, cur_height, payment_id,
9436 &None, session_privs[0]).unwrap();
9437 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9440 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9441 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9442 pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, our_payment_hash, Some(our_payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), false, None);
9444 assert!(nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
9446 nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[1], &our_payment_hash,
9447 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), 14_000_000, cur_height, payment_id, &None, session_privs[1]).unwrap();
9448 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9451 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9452 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9453 let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
9455 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
9456 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
9458 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
9459 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
9461 let mut events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9462 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9463 let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
9465 nodes[3].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
9466 check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 0);
9467 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[3], nodes[2], payment_event.commitment_msg, true, true);
9469 // At this point, nodes[3] should notice the two HTLCs don't contain the same total payment
9470 // amount. It will assume the second is a privacy attack (no longer particularly relevant
9471 // post-payment_secrets) and fail back the new HTLC.
9473 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[3]);
9474 nodes[3].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
9475 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[3], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
9476 nodes[3].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
9478 check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
9480 let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[3], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
9481 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
9482 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[3], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
9484 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }]);
9485 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
9487 let fail_updates_2 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9488 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_2.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
9489 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[2], fail_updates_2.commitment_signed, false);
9491 expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
9493 nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[1], &our_payment_hash,
9494 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), 15_000_000, cur_height, payment_id,
9495 &None, session_privs[2]).unwrap();
9496 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9498 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9499 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9500 pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, our_payment_hash, Some(our_payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), true, None);
9502 do_claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, our_payment_preimage);
9503 expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], our_payment_preimage, Some(None), true);
9507 fn test_keysend_payments_to_public_node() {
9508 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9509 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9510 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
9511 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9513 let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
9514 let network_graph = nodes[0].network_graph.clone();
9515 let payer_pubkey = nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id();
9516 let payee_pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
9517 let route_params = RouteParameters {
9518 payment_params: PaymentParameters::for_keysend(payee_pubkey, 40),
9519 final_value_msat: 10000,
9521 let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::new();
9522 let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
9523 let route = find_route(&payer_pubkey, &route_params, &network_graph, None, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
9525 let test_preimage = PaymentPreimage([42; 32]);
9526 let payment_hash = nodes[0].node.send_spontaneous_payment(&route, Some(test_preimage),
9527 RecipientOnionFields::spontaneous_empty(), PaymentId(test_preimage.0)).unwrap();
9528 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9529 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9530 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9531 let event = events.pop().unwrap();
9532 let path = vec![&nodes[1]];
9533 pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &path, 10000, payment_hash, None, event, true, Some(test_preimage));
9534 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &path, test_preimage);
9538 fn test_keysend_payments_to_private_node() {
9539 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9540 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9541 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
9542 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9544 let payer_pubkey = nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id();
9545 let payee_pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
9547 let _chan = create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
9548 let route_params = RouteParameters {
9549 payment_params: PaymentParameters::for_keysend(payee_pubkey, 40),
9550 final_value_msat: 10000,
9552 let network_graph = nodes[0].network_graph.clone();
9553 let first_hops = nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels();
9554 let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::new();
9555 let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
9556 let route = find_route(
9557 &payer_pubkey, &route_params, &network_graph, Some(&first_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()),
9558 nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes
9561 let test_preimage = PaymentPreimage([42; 32]);
9562 let payment_hash = nodes[0].node.send_spontaneous_payment(&route, Some(test_preimage),
9563 RecipientOnionFields::spontaneous_empty(), PaymentId(test_preimage.0)).unwrap();
9564 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9565 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9566 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9567 let event = events.pop().unwrap();
9568 let path = vec![&nodes[1]];
9569 pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &path, 10000, payment_hash, None, event, true, Some(test_preimage));
9570 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &path, test_preimage);
9574 fn test_double_partial_claim() {
9575 // Test what happens if a node receives a payment, generates a PaymentClaimable event, the HTLCs
9576 // time out, the sender resends only some of the MPP parts, then the user processes the
9577 // PaymentClaimable event, ensuring they don't inadvertently claim only part of the full payment
9579 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
9580 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
9581 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
9582 let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9584 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 0);
9585 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 2, 100_000, 0);
9586 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 3, 100_000, 0);
9587 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, 100_000, 0);
9589 let (mut route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[3], 15_000_000);
9590 assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
9591 route.paths.sort_by(|path_a, _| {
9592 // Sort the path so that the path through nodes[1] comes first
9593 if path_a.hops[0].pubkey == nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id() {
9594 core::cmp::Ordering::Less } else { core::cmp::Ordering::Greater }
9597 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[0], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], 15_000_000, payment_hash, payment_secret);
9598 // nodes[3] has now received a PaymentClaimable event...which it will take some (exorbitant)
9599 // amount of time to respond to.
9601 // Connect some blocks to time out the payment
9602 connect_blocks(&nodes[3], TEST_FINAL_CLTV);
9603 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // To get the same height for sending later
9605 let failed_destinations = vec![
9606 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash },
9607 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash },
9609 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[3], failed_destinations);
9611 pass_failed_payment_back(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, payment_hash, PaymentFailureReason::RecipientRejected);
9613 // nodes[1] now retries one of the two paths...
9614 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9615 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
9616 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 2);
9618 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9619 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
9620 let node_1_msgs = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
9621 pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), node_1_msgs, false, None);
9623 // At this point nodes[3] has received one half of the payment, and the user goes to handle
9624 // that PaymentClaimable event they got hours ago and never handled...we should refuse to claim.
9625 nodes[3].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
9626 check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 0);
9627 assert!(nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
9630 /// The possible events which may trigger a `max_dust_htlc_exposure` breach
9631 #[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
9632 enum ExposureEvent {
9633 /// Breach occurs at HTLC forwarding (see `send_htlc`)
9635 /// Breach occurs at HTLC reception (see `update_add_htlc`)
9637 /// Breach occurs at outbound update_fee (see `send_update_fee`)
9638 AtUpdateFeeOutbound,
9641 fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_event: ExposureEvent, on_holder_tx: bool) {
9642 // Test that we properly reject dust HTLC violating our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`
9645 // At HTLC forward (`send_payment()`), if the sum of the trimmed-to-dust HTLC inbound and
9646 // trimmed-to-dust HTLC outbound balance and this new payment as included on next
9647 // counterparty commitment are above our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`, we'll reject the
9648 // update. At HTLC reception (`update_add_htlc()`), if the sum of the trimmed-to-dust HTLC
9649 // inbound and trimmed-to-dust HTLC outbound balance and this new received HTLC as included
9650 // on next counterparty commitment are above our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`, we'll fail
9651 // the update. Note, we return a `temporary_channel_failure` (0x1000 | 7), as the channel
9652 // might be available again for HTLC processing once the dust bandwidth has cleared up.
9654 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9655 let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
9656 config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat = 5_000_000; // default setting value
9657 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9658 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config), None]);
9659 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9661 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 500_000_000, 42, None).unwrap();
9662 let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9663 open_channel.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 50_000_000;
9664 open_channel.max_accepted_htlcs = 60;
9666 open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis = 546;
9668 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel);
9669 let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9670 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel);
9672 let opt_anchors = false;
9674 let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 42);
9677 let mut node_0_per_peer_lock;
9678 let mut node_0_peer_state_lock;
9679 let mut chan = get_channel_ref!(nodes[0], nodes[1], node_0_per_peer_lock, node_0_peer_state_lock, temporary_channel_id);
9680 chan.holder_dust_limit_satoshis = 546;
9683 nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
9684 nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
9685 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9686 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9688 nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
9689 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9690 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9692 let (channel_ready, channel_id) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx);
9693 let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &channel_ready);
9694 update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update);
9696 let dust_buffer_feerate = {
9697 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
9698 let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
9699 let chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&channel_id).unwrap();
9700 chan.get_dust_buffer_feerate(None) as u64
9702 let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_timeout_tx_weight(opt_anchors) / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
9703 let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
9705 let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_success_tx_weight(opt_anchors) / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
9706 let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
9708 let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx: u64 = 25;
9709 let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx;
9712 if dust_outbound_balance {
9713 // Outbound dust threshold: 2223 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + holder's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
9714 // Outbound dust balance: 4372 sats
9715 // Note, we need sent payment to be above outbound dust threshold on counterparty_tx of 2132 sats
9716 for _ in 0..dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx {
9717 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat);
9718 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9719 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
9722 // Inbound dust threshold: 2324 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + holder's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
9723 // Inbound dust balance: 4372 sats
9724 // Note, we need sent payment to be above outbound dust threshold on counterparty_tx of 2031 sats
9725 for _ in 0..dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx {
9726 route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat);
9730 if dust_outbound_balance {
9731 // Outbound dust threshold: 2132 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + counteparty's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
9732 // Outbound dust balance: 5000 sats
9733 for _ in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx {
9734 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat);
9735 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9736 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
9739 // Inbound dust threshold: 2031 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + counteparty's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
9740 // Inbound dust balance: 5000 sats
9741 for _ in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx {
9742 route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat);
9747 let dust_overflow = dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat * (dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx + 1);
9748 if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward {
9749 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], if on_holder_tx { dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat });
9750 let mut config = UserConfig::default();
9751 // With default dust exposure: 5000 sats
9753 let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1);
9754 let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
9755 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9756 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)
9757 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
9758 assert_eq!(err, &format!("Cannot send value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat)));
9760 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9761 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)
9762 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
9763 assert_eq!(err, &format!("Cannot send value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", dust_overflow, config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat)));
9765 } else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception {
9766 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], if on_holder_tx { dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat });
9767 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9768 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
9769 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9770 let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9771 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9772 let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0));
9773 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
9774 // With default dust exposure: 5000 sats
9776 // Outbound dust balance: 6399 sats
9777 let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1);
9778 let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
9779 nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
9781 // Outbound dust balance: 5200 sats
9782 nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", dust_overflow, config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
9784 } else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound {
9785 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 2_500_000);
9786 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9787 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
9789 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
9790 *feerate_lock = *feerate_lock * 10;
9792 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
9793 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9794 nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channel", "Cannot afford to send new feerate at 2530 without infringing max dust htlc exposure", 1);
9797 let _ = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9798 let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
9799 added_monitors.clear();
9803 fn test_max_dust_htlc_exposure() {
9804 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true);
9805 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true);
9806 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true);
9807 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false);
9808 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false);
9809 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false);
9810 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true);
9811 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false);
9812 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true);
9813 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false);
9814 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false);
9815 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true);
9819 fn test_non_final_funding_tx() {
9820 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9821 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9822 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
9823 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9825 let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
9826 let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9827 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
9828 let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9829 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel_message);
9831 let best_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
9833 let chan_id = *nodes[0].network_chan_count.borrow();
9834 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
9835 let input = TxIn { previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint::null(), script_sig: bitcoin::Script::new(), sequence: Sequence(1), witness: Witness::from_vec(vec!(vec!(1))) };
9836 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9837 let mut tx = match events[0] {
9838 Event::FundingGenerationReady { ref channel_value_satoshis, ref output_script, .. } => {
9839 // Timelock the transaction _beyond_ the best client height + 1.
9840 Transaction { version: chan_id as i32, lock_time: PackedLockTime(best_height + 2), input: vec![input], output: vec![TxOut {
9841 value: *channel_value_satoshis, script_pubkey: output_script.clone(),
9844 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
9846 // Transaction should fail as it's evaluated as non-final for propagation.
9847 match nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temp_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()) {
9848 Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => {
9849 assert_eq!(format!("Funding transaction absolute timelock is non-final"), err);
9854 // However, transaction should be accepted if it's in a +1 headroom from best block.
9855 tx.lock_time = PackedLockTime(tx.lock_time.0 - 1);
9856 assert!(nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temp_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).is_ok());
9857 get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9861 fn accept_busted_but_better_fee() {
9862 // If a peer sends us a fee update that is too low, but higher than our previous channel
9863 // feerate, we should accept it. In the future we may want to consider closing the channel
9864 // later, but for now we only accept the update.
9865 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9866 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9867 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
9868 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9870 create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
9872 // Set nodes[1] to expect 5,000 sat/kW.
9874 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
9875 *feerate_lock = 5000;
9878 // If nodes[0] increases their feerate, even if its not enough, nodes[1] should accept it.
9880 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
9881 *feerate_lock = 1000;
9883 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
9884 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9886 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9887 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9889 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
9890 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
9891 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], commitment_signed, false);
9893 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
9896 // If nodes[0] increases their feerate further, even if its not enough, nodes[1] should accept
9899 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
9900 *feerate_lock = 2000;
9902 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
9903 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9905 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9906 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9908 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
9909 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
9910 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], commitment_signed, false);
9912 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
9915 // However, if nodes[0] decreases their feerate, nodes[1] should reject it and close the
9918 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
9919 *feerate_lock = 1000;
9921 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
9922 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9924 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9925 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9927 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, .. }, .. } => {
9928 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
9929 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError {
9930 err: "Peer's feerate much too low. Actual: 1000. Our expected lower limit: 5000 (- 250)".to_owned() });
9931 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
9932 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9934 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
9938 fn do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(valid_delta: bool, use_user_hash: bool) {
9939 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9940 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9941 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
9942 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9943 let min_final_cltv_expiry_delta = 120;
9944 let final_cltv_expiry_delta = if valid_delta { min_final_cltv_expiry_delta + 2 } else {
9945 min_final_cltv_expiry_delta - 2 };
9946 let recv_value = 100_000;
9948 create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
9950 let payment_parameters = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), final_cltv_expiry_delta as u32);
9951 let (payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = if use_user_hash {
9952 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[1],
9953 Some(recv_value), Some(min_final_cltv_expiry_delta));
9954 (payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret)
9956 let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(recv_value), 7200, Some(min_final_cltv_expiry_delta)).unwrap();
9957 (payment_hash, nodes[1].node.get_payment_preimage(payment_hash, payment_secret).unwrap(), payment_secret)
9959 let route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_parameters, recv_value, final_cltv_expiry_delta as u32).unwrap();
9960 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9961 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
9962 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9963 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9964 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9965 let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
9966 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
9967 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
9968 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
9971 expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash, payment_secret, recv_value, if use_user_hash {
9972 None } else { Some(payment_preimage) }, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9974 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
9976 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash }]);
9978 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9980 let fail_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9981 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
9982 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
9984 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, true);
9989 fn test_payment_with_custom_min_cltv_expiry_delta() {
9990 do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(false, false);
9991 do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(false, true);
9992 do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(true, false);
9993 do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(true, true);