1 // This file is Copyright its original authors, visible in version control
4 // This file is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE
5 // or http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
6 // <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your option.
7 // You may not use this file except in accordance with one or both of these
10 //! Tests that test standing up a network of ChannelManagers, creating channels, sending
11 //! payments/messages between them, and often checking the resulting ChannelMonitors are able to
12 //! claim outputs on-chain.
15 use crate::chain::{ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, Confirm, Listen, Watch};
16 use crate::chain::chaininterface::LowerBoundedFeeEstimator;
17 use crate::chain::channelmonitor;
18 use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, ANTI_REORG_DELAY};
19 use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
20 use crate::sign::{ChannelSigner, EcdsaChannelSigner, EntropySource, SignerProvider};
21 use crate::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PathFailure, PaymentPurpose, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination, PaymentFailureReason};
22 use crate::ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash};
23 use crate::ln::channel::{commitment_tx_base_weight, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC, CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER, FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT, get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis, OutboundV1Channel, InboundV1Channel};
24 use crate::ln::channelmanager::{self, PaymentId, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, RecipientOnionFields, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, ENABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS, DISABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
25 use crate::ln::channel::{DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS, ChannelError};
26 use crate::ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils};
27 use crate::ln::chan_utils::{OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT, htlc_success_tx_weight, htlc_timeout_tx_weight, HTLCOutputInCommitment};
28 use crate::routing::gossip::{NetworkGraph, NetworkUpdate};
29 use crate::routing::router::{Path, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, get_route};
30 use crate::ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, ChannelTypeFeatures, NodeFeatures};
32 use crate::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, RoutingMessageHandler, ErrorAction};
33 use crate::util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingSigner;
34 use crate::util::test_utils::{self, WatchtowerPersister};
35 use crate::util::errors::APIError;
36 use crate::util::ser::{Writeable, ReadableArgs};
37 use crate::util::string::UntrustedString;
38 use crate::util::config::{UserConfig, MaxDustHTLCExposure};
40 use bitcoin::hash_types::BlockHash;
41 use bitcoin::blockdata::script::{Builder, Script};
42 use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes;
43 use bitcoin::blockdata::constants::genesis_block;
44 use bitcoin::network::constants::Network;
45 use bitcoin::{PackedLockTime, Sequence, Transaction, TxIn, TxOut, Witness};
46 use bitcoin::OutPoint as BitcoinOutPoint;
48 use bitcoin::secp256k1::Secp256k1;
49 use bitcoin::secp256k1::{PublicKey,SecretKey};
54 use crate::prelude::*;
55 use alloc::collections::BTreeSet;
56 use core::default::Default;
57 use core::iter::repeat;
58 use bitcoin::hashes::Hash;
59 use crate::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
61 use crate::ln::functional_test_utils::*;
62 use crate::ln::chan_utils::CommitmentTransaction;
64 use super::channel::UNFUNDED_CHANNEL_AGE_LIMIT_TICKS;
67 fn test_insane_channel_opens() {
68 // Stand up a network of 2 nodes
69 use crate::ln::channel::TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS;
70 let mut cfg = UserConfig::default();
71 cfg.channel_handshake_limits.max_funding_satoshis = TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS + 1;
72 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
73 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
74 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(cfg)]);
75 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
77 // Instantiate channel parameters where we push the maximum msats given our
79 let channel_value_sat = 31337; // same as funding satoshis
80 let channel_reserve_satoshis = get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(channel_value_sat, &cfg);
81 let push_msat = (channel_value_sat - channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000;
83 // Have node0 initiate a channel to node1 with aforementioned parameters
84 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_sat, push_msat, 42, None).unwrap();
86 // Extract the channel open message from node0 to node1
87 let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
89 // Test helper that asserts we get the correct error string given a mutator
90 // that supposedly makes the channel open message insane
91 let insane_open_helper = |expected_error_str: &str, message_mutator: fn(msgs::OpenChannel) -> msgs::OpenChannel| {
92 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &message_mutator(open_channel_message.clone()));
93 let msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
94 assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
95 let expected_regex = regex::Regex::new(expected_error_str).unwrap();
96 if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref action, .. } = msg_events[0] {
98 &ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. } => {
99 nodes[1].logger.assert_log_regex("lightning::ln::channelmanager", expected_regex, 1);
101 _ => panic!("unexpected event!"),
103 } else { assert!(false); }
106 use crate::ln::channelmanager::MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT;
108 // Test all mutations that would make the channel open message insane
109 insane_open_helper(format!("Per our config, funding must be at most {}. It was {}", TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS + 1, TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS + 2).as_str(), |mut msg| { msg.funding_satoshis = TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS + 2; msg });
110 insane_open_helper(format!("Funding must be smaller than the total bitcoin supply. It was {}", TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS).as_str(), |mut msg| { msg.funding_satoshis = TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS; msg });
112 insane_open_helper("Bogus channel_reserve_satoshis", |mut msg| { msg.channel_reserve_satoshis = msg.funding_satoshis + 1; msg });
114 insane_open_helper(r"push_msat \d+ was larger than channel amount minus reserve \(\d+\)", |mut msg| { msg.push_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000 + 1; msg });
116 insane_open_helper("Peer never wants payout outputs?", |mut msg| { msg.dust_limit_satoshis = msg.funding_satoshis + 1 ; msg });
118 insane_open_helper(r"Minimum htlc value \(\d+\) was larger than full channel value \(\d+\)", |mut msg| { msg.htlc_minimum_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000; msg });
120 insane_open_helper("They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period", |mut msg| { msg.to_self_delay = MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT + 1; msg });
122 insane_open_helper("0 max_accepted_htlcs makes for a useless channel", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 0; msg });
124 insane_open_helper("max_accepted_htlcs was 484. It must not be larger than 483", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 484; msg });
128 fn test_funding_exceeds_no_wumbo_limit() {
129 // Test that if a peer does not support wumbo channels, we'll refuse to open a wumbo channel to
131 use crate::ln::channel::MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO;
132 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
133 let mut node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
134 *node_cfgs[1].override_init_features.borrow_mut() = Some(channelmanager::provided_init_features(&test_default_channel_config()).clear_wumbo());
135 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
136 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
138 match nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO + 1, 0, 42, None) {
139 Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => {
140 assert_eq!(format!("funding_value must not exceed {}, it was {}", MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO, MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO + 1), err);
146 fn do_test_counterparty_no_reserve(send_from_initiator: bool) {
147 // A peer providing a channel_reserve_satoshis of 0 (or less than our dust limit) is insecure,
148 // but only for them. Because some LSPs do it with some level of trust of the clients (for a
149 // substantial UX improvement), we explicitly allow it. Because it's unlikely to happen often
150 // in normal testing, we test it explicitly here.
151 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
152 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
153 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
154 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
155 let default_config = UserConfig::default();
157 // Have node0 initiate a channel to node1 with aforementioned parameters
158 let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
159 let feerate_per_kw = 253;
160 let channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
161 push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 4 * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000 * 1000;
162 push_amt -= get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
164 let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, if send_from_initiator { 0 } else { push_amt }, 42, None).unwrap();
165 let mut open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
166 if !send_from_initiator {
167 open_channel_message.channel_reserve_satoshis = 0;
168 open_channel_message.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 100_000_000;
170 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
172 // Extract the channel accept message from node1 to node0
173 let mut accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
174 if send_from_initiator {
175 accept_channel_message.channel_reserve_satoshis = 0;
176 accept_channel_message.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 100_000_000;
178 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel_message);
180 let sender_node = if send_from_initiator { &nodes[1] } else { &nodes[0] };
181 let counterparty_node = if send_from_initiator { &nodes[0] } else { &nodes[1] };
182 let mut sender_node_per_peer_lock;
183 let mut sender_node_peer_state_lock;
184 if send_from_initiator {
185 let chan = get_inbound_v1_channel_ref!(sender_node, counterparty_node, sender_node_per_peer_lock, sender_node_peer_state_lock, temp_channel_id);
186 chan.context.holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis = 0;
187 chan.context.holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 100_000_000;
189 let chan = get_outbound_v1_channel_ref!(sender_node, counterparty_node, sender_node_per_peer_lock, sender_node_peer_state_lock, temp_channel_id);
190 chan.context.holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis = 0;
191 chan.context.holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 100_000_000;
195 let funding_tx = sign_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 100_000, temp_channel_id);
196 let funding_msgs = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_tx);
197 create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_msgs.0);
199 // nodes[0] should now be able to send the full balance to nodes[1], violating nodes[1]'s
200 // security model if it ever tries to send funds back to nodes[0] (but that's not our problem).
201 if send_from_initiator {
202 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100_000_000
203 // Note that for outbound channels we have to consider the commitment tx fee and the
204 // "fee spike buffer", which is currently a multiple of the total commitment tx fee as
205 // well as an additional HTLC.
206 - FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE * commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, 2, &channel_type_features));
208 send_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], push_amt);
213 fn test_counterparty_no_reserve() {
214 do_test_counterparty_no_reserve(true);
215 do_test_counterparty_no_reserve(false);
219 fn test_async_inbound_update_fee() {
220 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
221 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
222 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
223 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
224 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
227 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
231 // send (1) commitment_signed -.
232 // <- update_add_htlc/commitment_signed
233 // send (2) RAA (awaiting remote revoke) -.
234 // (1) commitment_signed is delivered ->
235 // .- send (3) RAA (awaiting remote revoke)
236 // (2) RAA is delivered ->
237 // .- send (4) commitment_signed
238 // <- (3) RAA is delivered
239 // send (5) commitment_signed -.
240 // <- (4) commitment_signed is delivered
242 // (5) commitment_signed is delivered ->
244 // (6) RAA is delivered ->
246 // First nodes[0] generates an update_fee
248 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
251 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
252 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
254 let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
255 assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
256 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] { // (1)
257 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
258 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
260 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
263 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
265 // ...but before it's delivered, nodes[1] starts to send a payment back to nodes[0]...
266 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 40000);
267 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
268 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
269 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
271 let payment_event = {
272 let mut events_1 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
273 assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 1);
274 SendEvent::from_event(events_1.remove(0))
276 assert_eq!(payment_event.node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
277 assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
279 // ...now when the messages get delivered everyone should be happy
280 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
281 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg); // (2)
282 let as_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
283 // nodes[0] is awaiting nodes[1] revoke_and_ack so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
284 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
286 // deliver(1), generate (3):
287 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
288 let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
289 // nodes[1] is awaiting nodes[0] revoke_and_ack so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
290 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
292 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack); // deliver (2)
293 let bs_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
294 assert!(bs_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty()); // (4)
295 assert!(bs_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty()); // (4)
296 assert!(bs_update.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty()); // (4)
297 assert!(bs_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty()); // (4)
298 assert!(bs_update.update_fee.is_none()); // (4)
299 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
301 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack); // deliver (3)
302 let as_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
303 assert!(as_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty()); // (5)
304 assert!(as_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty()); // (5)
305 assert!(as_update.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty()); // (5)
306 assert!(as_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty()); // (5)
307 assert!(as_update.update_fee.is_none()); // (5)
308 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
310 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_update.commitment_signed); // deliver (4)
311 let as_second_revoke = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
312 // only (6) so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
313 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
315 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_update.commitment_signed); // deliver (5)
316 let bs_second_revoke = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
317 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
319 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_revoke);
320 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
322 let events_2 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
323 assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
325 Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable {..} => {}, // If we actually processed we'd receive the payment
326 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
329 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_second_revoke); // deliver (6)
330 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
334 fn test_update_fee_unordered_raa() {
335 // Just the intro to the previous test followed by an out-of-order RAA (which caused a
336 // crash in an earlier version of the update_fee patch)
337 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
338 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
339 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
340 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
341 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
344 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
346 // First nodes[0] generates an update_fee
348 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
351 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
352 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
354 let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
355 assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
356 let update_msg = match events_0[0] { // (1)
357 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, .. }, .. } => {
360 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
363 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
365 // ...but before it's delivered, nodes[1] starts to send a payment back to nodes[0]...
366 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 40000);
367 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
368 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
369 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
371 let payment_event = {
372 let mut events_1 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
373 assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 1);
374 SendEvent::from_event(events_1.remove(0))
376 assert_eq!(payment_event.node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
377 assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
379 // ...now when the messages get delivered everyone should be happy
380 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
381 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg); // (2)
382 let as_revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
383 // nodes[0] is awaiting nodes[1] revoke_and_ack so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
384 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
386 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_msg); // deliver (2)
387 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
389 // We can't continue, sadly, because our (1) now has a bogus signature
393 fn test_multi_flight_update_fee() {
394 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
395 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
396 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
397 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
398 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
401 // update_fee/commitment_signed ->
402 // .- send (1) RAA and (2) commitment_signed
403 // update_fee (never committed) ->
405 // We have to manually generate the above update_fee, it is allowed by the protocol but we
406 // don't track which updates correspond to which revoke_and_ack responses so we're in
407 // AwaitingRAA mode and will not generate the update_fee yet.
408 // <- (1) RAA delivered
409 // (3) is generated and send (4) CS -.
410 // Note that A cannot generate (4) prior to (1) being delivered as it otherwise doesn't
411 // know the per_commitment_point to use for it.
412 // <- (2) commitment_signed delivered
414 // B should send no response here
415 // (4) commitment_signed delivered ->
416 // <- RAA/commitment_signed delivered
419 // First nodes[0] generates an update_fee
422 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
423 initial_feerate = *feerate_lock;
424 *feerate_lock = initial_feerate + 20;
426 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
427 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
429 let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
430 assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
431 let (update_msg_1, commitment_signed_1) = match events_0[0] { // (1)
432 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
433 (update_fee.as_ref().unwrap(), commitment_signed)
435 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
438 // Deliver first update_fee/commitment_signed pair, generating (1) and (2):
439 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg_1);
440 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed_1);
441 let (bs_revoke_msg, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
442 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
444 // nodes[0] is awaiting a revoke from nodes[1] before it will create a new commitment
447 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
448 *feerate_lock = initial_feerate + 40;
450 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
451 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
452 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
454 // Create the (3) update_fee message that nodes[0] will generate before it does...
455 let mut update_msg_2 = msgs::UpdateFee {
456 channel_id: update_msg_1.channel_id.clone(),
457 feerate_per_kw: (initial_feerate + 30) as u32,
460 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg_2);
462 update_msg_2.feerate_per_kw = (initial_feerate + 40) as u32;
464 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg_2);
466 // Deliver (1), generating (3) and (4)
467 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_msg);
468 let as_second_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
469 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
470 assert!(as_second_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
471 assert!(as_second_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
472 assert!(as_second_update.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
473 assert!(as_second_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
474 // Check that the update_fee newly generated matches what we delivered:
475 assert_eq!(as_second_update.update_fee.as_ref().unwrap().channel_id, update_msg_2.channel_id);
476 assert_eq!(as_second_update.update_fee.as_ref().unwrap().feerate_per_kw, update_msg_2.feerate_per_kw);
478 // Deliver (2) commitment_signed
479 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed);
480 let as_revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
481 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
482 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
484 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_msg);
485 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
486 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
489 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_second_update.commitment_signed);
490 let (bs_second_revoke, bs_second_commitment) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
491 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
493 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_revoke);
494 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
495 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
497 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_commitment);
498 let as_second_revoke = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
499 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
500 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
502 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_second_revoke);
503 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
504 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
507 fn do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(steps: u8) {
508 // Previously, we had issues deserializing channels when we hadn't connected the first block
509 // after creation. To catch that and similar issues, we lean on the Node::drop impl to test
510 // serialization round-trips and simply do steps towards opening a channel and then drop the
513 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
514 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
515 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
516 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
518 if steps & 0b1000_0000 != 0{
519 let block = create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), 42, Vec::new());
520 connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
521 connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
524 if steps & 0x0f == 0 { return; }
525 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
526 let open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
528 if steps & 0x0f == 1 { return; }
529 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel);
530 let accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
532 if steps & 0x0f == 2 { return; }
533 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel);
535 let (temporary_channel_id, tx, funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42);
537 if steps & 0x0f == 3 { return; }
538 nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
539 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
540 let funding_created = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
542 if steps & 0x0f == 4 { return; }
543 nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created);
545 let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
546 assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
547 assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
548 added_monitors.clear();
550 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
552 let funding_signed = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
554 if steps & 0x0f == 5 { return; }
555 nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed);
557 let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
558 assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
559 assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
560 added_monitors.clear();
563 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
564 let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
565 assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 0);
567 if steps & 0x0f == 6 { return; }
568 create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm_first(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx, 2);
570 if steps & 0x0f == 7 { return; }
571 confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[0], &tx, 2);
572 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH);
573 create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm_second(&nodes[1], &nodes[0]);
574 expect_channel_ready_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
578 fn test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens() {
579 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(0);
580 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(0 | 0b1000_0000);
581 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(1);
582 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(1 | 0b1000_0000);
583 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(2);
584 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(2 | 0b1000_0000);
585 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(3);
586 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(3 | 0b1000_0000);
587 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(4);
588 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(4 | 0b1000_0000);
589 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(5);
590 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(5 | 0b1000_0000);
591 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(6);
592 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(6 | 0b1000_0000);
593 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(7);
594 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(7 | 0b1000_0000);
595 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(8);
596 do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(8 | 0b1000_0000);
600 fn test_update_fee_vanilla() {
601 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
602 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
603 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
604 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
605 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
608 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
611 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
612 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
614 let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
615 assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
616 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] {
617 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id:_, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_add_htlcs:_, update_fulfill_htlcs:_, update_fail_htlcs:_, update_fail_malformed_htlcs:_, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
618 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
620 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
622 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
624 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
625 let (revoke_msg, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
626 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
628 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
629 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
630 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
632 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
633 let revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
634 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
635 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
637 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
638 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
639 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
643 fn test_update_fee_that_funder_cannot_afford() {
644 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
645 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
646 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
647 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
648 let channel_value = 5000;
650 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value, push_sats * 1000);
651 let channel_id = chan.2;
652 let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
653 let default_config = UserConfig::default();
654 let bs_channel_reserve_sats = get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(channel_value, &default_config);
656 let channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
658 // Calculate the maximum feerate that A can afford. Note that we don't send an update_fee
659 // CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER HTLCs before actually running out of local balance, so we
660 // calculate two different feerates here - the expected local limit as well as the expected
662 let feerate = ((channel_value - bs_channel_reserve_sats - push_sats) * 1000 / (commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER as u64 * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC)) as u32;
663 let non_buffer_feerate = ((channel_value - bs_channel_reserve_sats - push_sats) * 1000 / commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features)) as u32;
665 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
666 *feerate_lock = feerate;
668 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
669 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
670 let update_msg = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
672 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg.update_fee.unwrap());
674 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], update_msg.commitment_signed, false);
676 // Confirm that the new fee based on the last local commitment txn is what we expected based on the feerate set above.
678 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], channel_id)[0].clone();
680 //We made sure neither party's funds are below the dust limit and there are no HTLCs here
681 assert_eq!(commitment_tx.output.len(), 2);
682 let total_fee: u64 = commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 0, &channel_type_features) / 1000;
683 let mut actual_fee = commitment_tx.output.iter().fold(0, |acc, output| acc + output.value);
684 actual_fee = channel_value - actual_fee;
685 assert_eq!(total_fee, actual_fee);
689 // Increment the feerate by a small constant, accounting for rounding errors
690 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
693 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
694 nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot afford to send new feerate at {}", feerate + 4), 1);
695 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
697 const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 281474976710654;
699 // Get the EnforcingSigner for each channel, which will be used to (1) get the keys
700 // needed to sign the new commitment tx and (2) sign the new commitment tx.
701 let (local_revocation_basepoint, local_htlc_basepoint, local_funding) = {
702 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
703 let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
704 let local_chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
705 let chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
706 let pubkeys = chan_signer.as_ref().pubkeys();
707 (pubkeys.revocation_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
708 pubkeys.funding_pubkey)
710 let (remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, remote_htlc_basepoint,remote_point, remote_funding) = {
711 let per_peer_state = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
712 let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
713 let remote_chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
714 let chan_signer = remote_chan.get_signer();
715 let pubkeys = chan_signer.as_ref().pubkeys();
716 (pubkeys.delayed_payment_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
717 chan_signer.as_ref().get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1, &secp_ctx),
718 pubkeys.funding_pubkey)
721 // Assemble the set of keys we can use for signatures for our commitment_signed message.
722 let commit_tx_keys = chan_utils::TxCreationKeys::derive_new(&secp_ctx, &remote_point, &remote_delayed_payment_basepoint,
723 &remote_htlc_basepoint, &local_revocation_basepoint, &local_htlc_basepoint);
726 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
727 let local_chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
728 let local_chan = local_chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
729 let local_chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
730 let mut htlcs: Vec<(HTLCOutputInCommitment, ())> = vec![];
731 let commitment_tx = CommitmentTransaction::new_with_auxiliary_htlc_data(
732 INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1,
734 channel_value - push_sats - commit_tx_fee_msat(non_buffer_feerate + 4, 0, &channel_type_features) / 1000,
735 local_funding, remote_funding,
736 commit_tx_keys.clone(),
737 non_buffer_feerate + 4,
739 &local_chan.context.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable()
741 local_chan_signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, Vec::new(), &secp_ctx).unwrap()
744 let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned {
747 htlc_signatures: res.1,
749 partial_signature_with_nonce: None,
752 let update_fee = msgs::UpdateFee {
754 feerate_per_kw: non_buffer_feerate + 4,
757 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fee);
759 //While producing the commitment_signed response after handling a received update_fee request the
760 //check to see if the funder, who sent the update_fee request, can afford the new fee (funder_balance >= fee+channel_reserve)
761 //Should produce and error.
762 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commit_signed_msg);
763 nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee".to_string(), 1);
764 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
765 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
766 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: String::from("Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee") },
767 [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], channel_value);
771 fn test_update_fee_with_fundee_update_add_htlc() {
772 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
773 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
774 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
775 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
776 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
779 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
782 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
785 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
786 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
788 let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
789 assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
790 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] {
791 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id:_, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_add_htlcs:_, update_fulfill_htlcs:_, update_fail_htlcs:_, update_fail_malformed_htlcs:_, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
792 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
794 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
796 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
797 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
798 let (revoke_msg, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
799 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
801 let (route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 800000);
803 // nothing happens since node[1] is in AwaitingRemoteRevoke
804 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
805 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
807 let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
808 assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 0);
809 added_monitors.clear();
811 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
812 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
813 // node[1] has nothing to do
815 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
816 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
817 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
819 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
820 let revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
821 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
822 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
823 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
824 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
825 // AwaitingRemoteRevoke ends here
827 let commitment_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
828 assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.len(), 1);
829 assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 0);
830 assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 0);
831 assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 0);
832 assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fee.is_none(), true);
834 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update.update_add_htlcs[0]);
835 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update.commitment_signed);
836 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
837 let (revoke, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
839 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke);
840 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
841 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
843 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
844 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
845 let revoke = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
846 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
848 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke);
849 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
850 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
852 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[0]);
854 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
855 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
857 Event::PaymentClaimable { .. } => { },
858 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
861 claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], our_payment_preimage);
863 send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 800000);
864 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 800000);
865 close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan.2, chan.3, true);
866 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
867 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
871 fn test_update_fee() {
872 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
873 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
874 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
875 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
876 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
877 let channel_id = chan.2;
880 // (1) update_fee/commitment_signed ->
881 // <- (2) revoke_and_ack
882 // .- send (3) commitment_signed
883 // (4) update_fee/commitment_signed ->
884 // .- send (5) revoke_and_ack (no CS as we're awaiting a revoke)
885 // <- (3) commitment_signed delivered
886 // send (6) revoke_and_ack -.
887 // <- (5) deliver revoke_and_ack
888 // (6) deliver revoke_and_ack ->
889 // .- send (7) commitment_signed in response to (4)
890 // <- (7) deliver commitment_signed
893 // Create and deliver (1)...
896 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
897 feerate = *feerate_lock;
898 *feerate_lock = feerate + 20;
900 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
901 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
903 let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
904 assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
905 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] {
906 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id:_, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_add_htlcs:_, update_fulfill_htlcs:_, update_fail_htlcs:_, update_fail_malformed_htlcs:_, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
907 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
909 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
911 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
913 // Generate (2) and (3):
914 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
915 let (revoke_msg, commitment_signed_0) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
916 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
919 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
920 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
921 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
923 // Create and deliver (4)...
925 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
926 *feerate_lock = feerate + 30;
928 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
929 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
930 let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
931 assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
932 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] {
933 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id:_, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_add_htlcs:_, update_fulfill_htlcs:_, update_fail_htlcs:_, update_fail_malformed_htlcs:_, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
934 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
936 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
939 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
940 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
941 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
943 let revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
944 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
946 // Handle (3), creating (6):
947 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed_0);
948 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
949 let revoke_msg_0 = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
950 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
953 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
954 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
955 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
957 // Deliver (6), creating (7):
958 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg_0);
959 let commitment_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
960 assert!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
961 assert!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
962 assert!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
963 assert!(commitment_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
964 assert!(commitment_update.update_fee.is_none());
965 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
968 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update.commitment_signed);
969 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
970 let revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
971 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
973 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
974 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
975 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
977 assert_eq!(get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], channel_id), feerate + 30);
978 assert_eq!(get_feerate!(nodes[1], nodes[0], channel_id), feerate + 30);
979 close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan.2, chan.3, true);
980 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
981 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
985 fn fake_network_test() {
986 // Simple test which builds a network of ChannelManagers, connects them to each other, and
987 // tests that payments get routed and transactions broadcast in semi-reasonable ways.
988 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
989 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
990 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
991 let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
993 // Create some initial channels
994 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
995 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
996 let chan_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
998 // Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels...
999 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
1000 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
1001 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
1002 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
1004 // Send some more payments
1005 send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 1000000);
1006 send_payment(&nodes[3], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[1], &nodes[0])[..], 1000000);
1007 send_payment(&nodes[3], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000);
1009 // Test failure packets
1010 let payment_hash_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 1000000).1;
1011 fail_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], payment_hash_1);
1013 // Add a new channel that skips 3
1014 let chan_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3);
1016 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], 1000000);
1017 send_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 1000000);
1018 send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
1019 send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
1020 send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
1021 send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
1022 send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
1024 // Do some rebalance loop payments, simultaneously
1025 let mut hops = Vec::with_capacity(3);
1026 hops.push(RouteHop {
1027 pubkey: nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(),
1028 node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
1029 short_channel_id: chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id,
1030 channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(),
1032 cltv_expiry_delta: chan_3.0.contents.cltv_expiry_delta as u32
1034 hops.push(RouteHop {
1035 pubkey: nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(),
1036 node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
1037 short_channel_id: chan_3.0.contents.short_channel_id,
1038 channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(),
1040 cltv_expiry_delta: chan_4.1.contents.cltv_expiry_delta as u32
1042 hops.push(RouteHop {
1043 pubkey: nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(),
1044 node_features: nodes[1].node.node_features(),
1045 short_channel_id: chan_4.0.contents.short_channel_id,
1046 channel_features: nodes[1].node.channel_features(),
1048 cltv_expiry_delta: TEST_FINAL_CLTV,
1050 hops[1].fee_msat = chan_4.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_4.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[2].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000;
1051 hops[0].fee_msat = chan_3.0.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_3.0.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[1].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000;
1052 let payment_preimage_1 = send_along_route(&nodes[1], Route { paths: vec![Path { hops, blinded_tail: None }], payment_params: None }, &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000).0;
1054 let mut hops = Vec::with_capacity(3);
1055 hops.push(RouteHop {
1056 pubkey: nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(),
1057 node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
1058 short_channel_id: chan_4.0.contents.short_channel_id,
1059 channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(),
1061 cltv_expiry_delta: chan_3.1.contents.cltv_expiry_delta as u32
1063 hops.push(RouteHop {
1064 pubkey: nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(),
1065 node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
1066 short_channel_id: chan_3.0.contents.short_channel_id,
1067 channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(),
1069 cltv_expiry_delta: chan_2.1.contents.cltv_expiry_delta as u32
1071 hops.push(RouteHop {
1072 pubkey: nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(),
1073 node_features: nodes[1].node.node_features(),
1074 short_channel_id: chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id,
1075 channel_features: nodes[1].node.channel_features(),
1077 cltv_expiry_delta: TEST_FINAL_CLTV,
1079 hops[1].fee_msat = chan_2.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_2.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[2].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000;
1080 hops[0].fee_msat = chan_3.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_3.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[1].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000;
1081 let payment_hash_2 = send_along_route(&nodes[1], Route { paths: vec![Path { hops, blinded_tail: None }], payment_params: None }, &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000).1;
1083 // Claim the rebalances...
1084 fail_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], payment_hash_2);
1085 claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
1087 // Close down the channels...
1088 close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan_1.2, chan_1.3, true);
1089 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
1090 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
1091 close_channel(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &chan_2.2, chan_2.3, false);
1092 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
1093 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
1094 close_channel(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &chan_3.2, chan_3.3, true);
1095 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
1096 check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
1097 close_channel(&nodes[1], &nodes[3], &chan_4.2, chan_4.3, false);
1098 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
1099 check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
1103 fn holding_cell_htlc_counting() {
1104 // Tests that HTLCs in the holding cell count towards the pending HTLC limits on outbound HTLCs
1105 // to ensure we don't end up with HTLCs sitting around in our holding cell for several
1106 // commitment dance rounds.
1107 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
1108 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
1109 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
1110 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1111 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
1112 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
1114 // Fetch a route in advance as we will be unable to once we're unable to send.
1115 let (route, payment_hash_1, _, payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 100000);
1117 let mut payments = Vec::new();
1119 let (route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 100000);
1120 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
1121 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
1122 payments.push((payment_preimage, payment_hash));
1124 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1126 let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1127 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
1128 let initial_payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
1129 assert_eq!(initial_payment_event.node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
1131 // There is now one HTLC in an outbound commitment transaction and (OUR_MAX_HTLCS - 1) HTLCs in
1132 // the holding cell waiting on B's RAA to send. At this point we should not be able to add
1135 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_1,
1136 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_1), PaymentId(payment_hash_1.0)
1137 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
1138 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1141 // This should also be true if we try to forward a payment.
1142 let (route, payment_hash_2, _, payment_secret_2) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 100000);
1144 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_2,
1145 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_2), PaymentId(payment_hash_2.0)).unwrap();
1146 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1149 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1150 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
1151 let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
1152 assert_eq!(payment_event.node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1154 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
1155 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
1156 // We have to forward pending HTLCs twice - once tries to forward the payment forward (and
1157 // fails), the second will process the resulting failure and fail the HTLC backward.
1158 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
1159 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
1160 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1162 let bs_fail_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
1163 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_fail_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
1164 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], bs_fail_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
1166 expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash_2, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
1168 // Now forward all the pending HTLCs and claim them back
1169 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &initial_payment_event.msgs[0]);
1170 nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &initial_payment_event.commitment_msg);
1171 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
1173 let (bs_revoke_and_ack, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1174 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
1175 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1176 let as_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
1178 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed);
1179 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1180 let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
1182 for ref update in as_updates.update_add_htlcs.iter() {
1183 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), update);
1185 nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.commitment_signed);
1186 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
1187 nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
1188 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
1189 let (bs_revoke_and_ack, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1191 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
1192 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1193 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed);
1194 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1195 let as_final_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
1197 nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_final_raa);
1198 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
1200 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
1202 let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
1203 assert_eq!(events.len(), payments.len());
1204 for (event, &(_, ref hash)) in events.iter().zip(payments.iter()) {
1206 &Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
1207 assert_eq!(*payment_hash, *hash);
1209 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1213 for (preimage, _) in payments.drain(..) {
1214 claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2]], preimage);
1217 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1000000);
1221 fn duplicate_htlc_test() {
1222 // Test that we accept duplicate payment_hash HTLCs across the network and that
1223 // claiming/failing them are all separate and don't affect each other
1224 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(6);
1225 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(6, &chanmon_cfgs);
1226 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(6, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None, None, None]);
1227 let mut nodes = create_network(6, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1229 // Create some initial channels to route via 3 to 4/5 from 0/1/2
1230 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 3);
1231 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3);
1232 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
1233 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 4);
1234 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 5);
1236 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 1000000);
1238 *nodes[0].network_payment_count.borrow_mut() -= 1;
1239 assert_eq!(route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 1000000).0, payment_preimage);
1241 *nodes[0].network_payment_count.borrow_mut() -= 1;
1242 assert_eq!(route_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[5])[..], 1000000).0, payment_preimage);
1244 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], payment_preimage);
1245 fail_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[5])[..], payment_hash);
1246 claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], payment_preimage);
1250 fn test_duplicate_htlc_different_direction_onchain() {
1251 // Test that ChannelMonitor doesn't generate 2 preimage txn
1252 // when we have 2 HTLCs with same preimage that go across a node
1253 // in opposite directions, even with the same payment secret.
1254 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1255 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1256 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1257 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1259 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
1262 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
1264 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 900_000);
1266 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 800_000);
1267 let node_a_payment_secret = nodes[0].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, None, 7200, None).unwrap();
1268 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[0]]], 800_000, payment_hash, node_a_payment_secret);
1270 // Provide preimage to node 0 by claiming payment
1271 nodes[0].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
1272 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, 800_000);
1273 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1275 // Broadcast node 1 commitment txn
1276 let remote_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_1.2);
1278 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output.len(), 4); // 1 local, 1 remote, 1 htlc inbound, 1 htlc outbound
1279 let mut has_both_htlcs = 0; // check htlcs match ones committed
1280 for outp in remote_txn[0].output.iter() {
1281 if outp.value == 800_000 / 1000 {
1282 has_both_htlcs += 1;
1283 } else if outp.value == 900_000 / 1000 {
1284 has_both_htlcs += 1;
1287 assert_eq!(has_both_htlcs, 2);
1289 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &remote_txn[0]);
1290 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1291 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
1292 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
1294 let claim_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
1295 assert_eq!(claim_txn.len(), 3);
1297 check_spends!(claim_txn[0], remote_txn[0]); // Immediate HTLC claim with preimage
1298 check_spends!(claim_txn[1], remote_txn[0]);
1299 check_spends!(claim_txn[2], remote_txn[0]);
1300 let preimage_tx = &claim_txn[0];
1301 let (preimage_bump_tx, timeout_tx) = if claim_txn[1].input[0].previous_output == preimage_tx.input[0].previous_output {
1302 (&claim_txn[1], &claim_txn[2])
1304 (&claim_txn[2], &claim_txn[1])
1307 assert_eq!(preimage_tx.input.len(), 1);
1308 assert_eq!(preimage_bump_tx.input.len(), 1);
1310 assert_eq!(preimage_tx.input.len(), 1);
1311 assert_eq!(preimage_tx.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC 1 <--> 0, preimage tx
1312 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[preimage_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 800);
1314 assert_eq!(timeout_tx.input.len(), 1);
1315 assert_eq!(timeout_tx.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC 0 <--> 1, timeout tx
1316 check_spends!(timeout_tx, remote_txn[0]);
1317 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 900);
1319 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1320 assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
1323 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
1324 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { node_id, action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg } } => {
1325 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1326 assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain.");
1328 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
1329 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
1330 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
1331 assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
1332 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
1333 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
1335 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1341 fn test_basic_channel_reserve() {
1342 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1343 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1344 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1345 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1346 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
1348 let chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
1349 let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
1351 // The 2* and +1 are for the fee spike reserve.
1352 let commit_tx_fee = 2 * commit_tx_fee_msat(get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2), 1 + 1, &get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2));
1353 let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - commit_tx_fee;
1354 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) =
1355 get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_can_send);
1356 route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat += 1;
1357 let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
1358 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).err().unwrap();
1360 PaymentSendFailure::AllFailedResendSafe(ref fails) => {
1361 if let &APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. } = &fails[0] {}
1362 else { panic!("Unexpected error variant"); }
1364 _ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"),
1366 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1368 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1]], max_can_send);
1372 fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() {
1373 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1374 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1375 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1376 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1377 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
1379 let (mut route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) =
1380 get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 3460000);
1381 route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat += 1;
1382 // Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
1383 let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
1384 let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).expect("RNG is bad!");
1386 let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
1388 let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
1389 let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0],
1390 3460001, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
1391 let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash).unwrap();
1392 let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
1395 amount_msat: htlc_msat,
1396 payment_hash: payment_hash,
1397 cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
1398 onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
1399 skimmed_fee_msat: None,
1402 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
1404 // Now manually create the commitment_signed message corresponding to the update_add
1405 // nodes[0] just sent. In the code for construction of this message, "local" refers
1406 // to the sender of the message, and "remote" refers to the receiver.
1408 let feerate_per_kw = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
1410 const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = (1 << 48) - 1;
1412 // Get the EnforcingSigner for each channel, which will be used to (1) get the keys
1413 // needed to sign the new commitment tx and (2) sign the new commitment tx.
1414 let (local_revocation_basepoint, local_htlc_basepoint, local_secret, next_local_point, local_funding) = {
1415 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
1416 let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
1417 let local_chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
1418 let chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
1419 // Make the signer believe we validated another commitment, so we can release the secret
1420 chan_signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
1422 let pubkeys = chan_signer.as_ref().pubkeys();
1423 (pubkeys.revocation_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
1424 chan_signer.as_ref().release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER),
1425 chan_signer.as_ref().get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2, &secp_ctx),
1426 chan_signer.as_ref().pubkeys().funding_pubkey)
1428 let (remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, remote_htlc_basepoint, remote_point, remote_funding) = {
1429 let per_peer_state = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
1430 let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
1431 let remote_chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
1432 let chan_signer = remote_chan.get_signer();
1433 let pubkeys = chan_signer.as_ref().pubkeys();
1434 (pubkeys.delayed_payment_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
1435 chan_signer.as_ref().get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1, &secp_ctx),
1436 chan_signer.as_ref().pubkeys().funding_pubkey)
1439 // Assemble the set of keys we can use for signatures for our commitment_signed message.
1440 let commit_tx_keys = chan_utils::TxCreationKeys::derive_new(&secp_ctx, &remote_point, &remote_delayed_payment_basepoint,
1441 &remote_htlc_basepoint, &local_revocation_basepoint, &local_htlc_basepoint);
1443 // Build the remote commitment transaction so we can sign it, and then later use the
1444 // signature for the commitment_signed message.
1445 let local_chan_balance = 1313;
1447 let accepted_htlc_info = chan_utils::HTLCOutputInCommitment {
1449 amount_msat: 3460001,
1450 cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
1452 transaction_output_index: Some(1),
1455 let commitment_number = INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1;
1458 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
1459 let local_chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
1460 let local_chan = local_chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
1461 let local_chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
1462 let commitment_tx = CommitmentTransaction::new_with_auxiliary_htlc_data(
1466 local_funding, remote_funding,
1467 commit_tx_keys.clone(),
1469 &mut vec![(accepted_htlc_info, ())],
1470 &local_chan.context.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable()
1472 local_chan_signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, Vec::new(), &secp_ctx).unwrap()
1475 let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned {
1478 htlc_signatures: res.1,
1480 partial_signature_with_nonce: None,
1483 // Send the commitment_signed message to the nodes[1].
1484 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commit_signed_msg);
1485 let _ = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1487 // Send the RAA to nodes[1].
1488 let raa_msg = msgs::RevokeAndACK {
1490 per_commitment_secret: local_secret,
1491 next_per_commitment_point: next_local_point,
1493 next_local_nonce: None,
1495 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa_msg);
1497 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1498 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
1499 // Make sure the HTLC failed in the way we expect.
1501 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fail_htlcs, .. }, .. } => {
1502 assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
1503 update_fail_htlcs[0].clone()
1505 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1507 nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(),
1508 format!("Attempting to fail HTLC due to fee spike buffer violation in channel {}. Rebalancing is required.", ::hex::encode(raa_msg.channel_id)), 1);
1510 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
1514 fn test_chan_reserve_violation_outbound_htlc_inbound_chan() {
1515 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1516 // Set the fee rate for the channel very high, to the point where the fundee
1517 // sending any above-dust amount would result in a channel reserve violation.
1518 // In this test we check that we would be prevented from sending an HTLC in
1520 let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
1521 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1522 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1523 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1524 let default_config = UserConfig::default();
1525 let channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
1527 let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
1528 push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64, &channel_type_features);
1530 push_amt -= get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
1532 let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt);
1534 // Fetch a route in advance as we will be unable to once we're unable to send.
1535 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1_000_000);
1536 // Sending exactly enough to hit the reserve amount should be accepted
1537 for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT {
1538 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
1541 // However one more HTLC should be significantly over the reserve amount and fail.
1542 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
1543 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
1544 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
1545 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1549 fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_outbound_channel() {
1550 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1551 let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
1552 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1553 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1554 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1555 let default_config = UserConfig::default();
1556 let channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
1558 // Set nodes[0]'s balance such that they will consider any above-dust received HTLC to be a
1559 // channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment
1560 // transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)).
1561 let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
1562 push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64, &channel_type_features);
1563 push_amt -= get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
1564 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt);
1566 // Send four HTLCs to cover the initial push_msat buffer we're required to include
1567 for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT {
1568 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
1571 let (mut route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) =
1572 get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1000);
1573 route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = 700_000;
1574 // Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
1575 let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
1576 let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
1577 let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
1578 let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
1579 let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0],
1580 700_000, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
1581 let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash).unwrap();
1582 let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
1584 htlc_id: MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64,
1585 amount_msat: htlc_msat,
1586 payment_hash: payment_hash,
1587 cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
1588 onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
1589 skimmed_fee_msat: None,
1592 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
1593 // Check that the payment failed and the channel is closed in response to the malicious UpdateAdd.
1594 nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value".to_string(), 1);
1595 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
1596 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
1597 assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value");
1598 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1599 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value".to_string() },
1600 [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
1604 fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_outbound_chan() {
1605 // Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an outbound channel, they don't count when
1606 // calculating our commitment transaction fee (this was previously broken).
1607 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1608 let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
1610 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1611 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
1612 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1613 let default_config = UserConfig::default();
1614 let channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
1616 // Set nodes[0]'s balance such that they will consider any above-dust received HTLC to be a
1617 // channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment
1618 // transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)).
1619 let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
1620 push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64, &channel_type_features);
1621 push_amt -= get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
1622 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, push_amt);
1624 let dust_amt = crate::ln::channel::MIN_CHAN_DUST_LIMIT_SATOSHIS * 1000
1625 + feerate_per_kw as u64 * htlc_success_tx_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000 * 1000 - 1;
1626 // In the previous code, routing this dust payment would cause nodes[0] to perceive a channel
1627 // reserve violation even though it's a dust HTLC and therefore shouldn't count towards the
1628 // commitment transaction fee.
1629 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_amt);
1631 // Send four HTLCs to cover the initial push_msat buffer we're required to include
1632 for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT {
1633 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
1636 // One more than the dust amt should fail, however.
1637 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) =
1638 get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], dust_amt);
1639 route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat += 1;
1640 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
1641 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
1642 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
1646 fn test_chan_init_feerate_unaffordability() {
1647 // Test that we will reject channel opens which do not leave enough to pay for any HTLCs due to
1648 // channel reserve and feerate requirements.
1649 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1650 let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
1651 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1652 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1653 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1654 let default_config = UserConfig::default();
1655 let channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
1657 // Set the push_msat amount such that nodes[0] will not be able to afford to add even a single
1659 let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
1660 push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64, &channel_type_features);
1661 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, push_amt + 1, 42, None).unwrap_err(),
1662 APIError::APIMisuseError { err: "Funding amount (356) can't even pay fee for initial commitment transaction fee of 357.".to_string() });
1664 // During open, we don't have a "counterparty channel reserve" to check against, so that
1665 // requirement only comes into play on the open_channel handling side.
1666 push_amt -= get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
1667 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, push_amt, 42, None).unwrap();
1668 let mut open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1669 open_channel_msg.push_msat += 1;
1670 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
1672 let msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1673 assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
1674 match msg_events[0] {
1675 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => {
1676 assert_eq!(msg.data, "Insufficient funding amount for initial reserve");
1678 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1683 fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_inbound_chan() {
1684 // Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an inbound channel, they don't count when
1685 // calculating our counterparty's commitment transaction fee (this was previously broken).
1686 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1687 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1688 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
1689 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1690 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 98000000);
1692 let payment_amt = 46000; // Dust amount
1693 // In the previous code, these first four payments would succeed.
1694 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1695 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1696 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1697 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1699 // Then these next 5 would be interpreted by nodes[1] as violating the fee spike buffer.
1700 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1701 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1702 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1703 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1704 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1706 // And this last payment previously resulted in nodes[1] closing on its inbound-channel
1707 // counterparty, because it counted all the previous dust HTLCs against nodes[0]'s commitment
1708 // transaction fee and therefore perceived this next payment as a channel reserve violation.
1709 let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
1713 fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_inbound_chan() {
1714 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
1715 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
1716 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
1717 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1718 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
1719 let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 100000, 95000000);
1722 let total_routing_fee_msat = (nodes.len() - 2) as u64 * feemsat;
1723 let chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
1724 let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
1725 let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
1727 // Add a 2* and +1 for the fee spike reserve.
1728 let commit_tx_fee_2_htlc = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 2 + 1, &channel_type_features);
1729 let recv_value_1 = (chan_stat.value_to_self_msat - chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat - total_routing_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlc)/2;
1730 let amt_msat_1 = recv_value_1 + total_routing_fee_msat;
1732 // Add a pending HTLC.
1733 let (route_1, our_payment_hash_1, _, our_payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], amt_msat_1);
1734 let payment_event_1 = {
1735 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_1, our_payment_hash_1,
1736 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret_1), PaymentId(our_payment_hash_1.0)).unwrap();
1737 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1739 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1740 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
1741 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
1743 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_1.msgs[0]);
1745 // Attempt to trigger a channel reserve violation --> payment failure.
1746 let commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs = commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 2, &channel_type_features);
1747 let recv_value_2 = chan_stat.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat_1 - chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat - total_routing_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs + 1;
1748 let amt_msat_2 = recv_value_2 + total_routing_fee_msat;
1749 let mut route_2 = route_1.clone();
1750 route_2.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat = amt_msat_2;
1752 // Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
1753 let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
1754 let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
1755 let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
1756 let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route_2.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
1757 let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(
1758 &route_2.paths[0], recv_value_2, RecipientOnionFields::spontaneous_empty(), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
1759 let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash_1).unwrap();
1760 let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
1763 amount_msat: htlc_msat + 1,
1764 payment_hash: our_payment_hash_1,
1765 cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
1766 onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
1767 skimmed_fee_msat: None,
1770 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
1771 // Check that the payment failed and the channel is closed in response to the malicious UpdateAdd.
1772 nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value".to_string(), 1);
1773 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
1774 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
1775 assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value");
1776 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1777 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value".to_string() },
1778 [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
1782 fn test_inbound_outbound_capacity_is_not_zero() {
1783 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1784 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1785 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1786 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1787 let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
1788 let channels0 = node_chanmgrs[0].list_channels();
1789 let channels1 = node_chanmgrs[1].list_channels();
1790 let default_config = UserConfig::default();
1791 assert_eq!(channels0.len(), 1);
1792 assert_eq!(channels1.len(), 1);
1794 let reserve = get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config);
1795 assert_eq!(channels0[0].inbound_capacity_msat, 95000000 - reserve*1000);
1796 assert_eq!(channels1[0].outbound_capacity_msat, 95000000 - reserve*1000);
1798 assert_eq!(channels0[0].outbound_capacity_msat, 100000 * 1000 - 95000000 - reserve*1000);
1799 assert_eq!(channels1[0].inbound_capacity_msat, 100000 * 1000 - 95000000 - reserve*1000);
1802 fn commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate: u32, num_htlcs: u64, channel_type_features: &ChannelTypeFeatures) -> u64 {
1803 (commitment_tx_base_weight(channel_type_features) + num_htlcs * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) * feerate as u64 / 1000 * 1000
1807 fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() {
1808 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
1809 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
1810 // When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
1811 // It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
1812 let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
1813 config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 239;
1814 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
1815 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1816 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 190000, 1001);
1817 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 190000, 1001);
1819 let mut stat01 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
1820 let mut stat11 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[0], chan_1.2);
1822 let mut stat12 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[2], chan_2.2);
1823 let mut stat22 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[2], nodes[1], chan_2.2);
1825 macro_rules! expect_forward {
1827 let mut events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1828 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
1829 check_added_monitors!($node, 1);
1830 let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0));
1835 let feemsat = 239; // set above
1836 let total_fee_msat = (nodes.len() - 2) as u64 * feemsat;
1837 let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
1838 let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
1840 let recv_value_0 = stat01.counterparty_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat - total_fee_msat;
1842 // attempt to send amt_msat > their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat
1844 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
1845 .with_bolt11_features(nodes[2].node.invoice_features()).unwrap().with_max_channel_saturation_power_of_half(0);
1846 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], payment_params, recv_value_0);
1847 route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat += 1;
1848 assert!(route.paths[0].hops.iter().rev().skip(1).all(|h| h.fee_msat == feemsat));
1850 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
1851 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
1852 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
1853 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1856 // channel reserve is bigger than their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat so loop to deplete
1857 // nodes[0]'s wealth
1859 let amt_msat = recv_value_0 + total_fee_msat;
1860 // 3 for the 3 HTLCs that will be sent, 2* and +1 for the fee spike reserve.
1861 // Also, ensure that each payment has enough to be over the dust limit to
1862 // ensure it'll be included in each commit tx fee calculation.
1863 let commit_tx_fee_all_htlcs = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 3 + 1, &channel_type_features);
1864 let ensure_htlc_amounts_above_dust_buffer = 3 * (stat01.counterparty_dust_limit_msat + 1000);
1865 if stat01.value_to_self_msat < stat01.channel_reserve_msat + commit_tx_fee_all_htlcs + ensure_htlc_amounts_above_dust_buffer + amt_msat {
1869 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
1870 .with_bolt11_features(nodes[2].node.invoice_features()).unwrap().with_max_channel_saturation_power_of_half(0);
1871 let route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, recv_value_0).unwrap();
1872 let (payment_preimage, ..) = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], recv_value_0);
1873 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage);
1875 let (stat01_, stat11_, stat12_, stat22_) = (
1876 get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2),
1877 get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[0], chan_1.2),
1878 get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[2], chan_2.2),
1879 get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[2], nodes[1], chan_2.2),
1882 assert_eq!(stat01_.value_to_self_msat, stat01.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat);
1883 assert_eq!(stat11_.value_to_self_msat, stat11.value_to_self_msat + amt_msat);
1884 assert_eq!(stat12_.value_to_self_msat, stat12.value_to_self_msat - (amt_msat - feemsat));
1885 assert_eq!(stat22_.value_to_self_msat, stat22.value_to_self_msat + (amt_msat - feemsat));
1886 stat01 = stat01_; stat11 = stat11_; stat12 = stat12_; stat22 = stat22_;
1889 // adding pending output.
1890 // 2* and +1 HTLCs on the commit tx fee for the fee spike reserve.
1891 // The reason we're dividing by two here is as follows: the dividend is the total outbound liquidity
1892 // after fees, the channel reserve, and the fee spike buffer are removed. We eventually want to
1893 // divide this quantity into 3 portions, that will each be sent in an HTLC. This allows us
1894 // to test channel channel reserve policy at the edges of what amount is sendable, i.e.
1895 // cases where 1 msat over X amount will cause a payment failure, but anything less than
1896 // that can be sent successfully. So, dividing by two is a somewhat arbitrary way of getting
1897 // the amount of the first of these aforementioned 3 payments. The reason we split into 3 payments
1898 // is to test the behavior of the holding cell with respect to channel reserve and commit tx fee
1900 let commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 2 + 1, &channel_type_features);
1901 let recv_value_1 = (stat01.value_to_self_msat - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs)/2;
1902 let amt_msat_1 = recv_value_1 + total_fee_msat;
1904 let (route_1, our_payment_hash_1, our_payment_preimage_1, our_payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_1);
1905 let payment_event_1 = {
1906 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_1, our_payment_hash_1,
1907 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret_1), PaymentId(our_payment_hash_1.0)).unwrap();
1908 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1910 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1911 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
1912 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
1914 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_1.msgs[0]);
1916 // channel reserve test with htlc pending output > 0
1917 let recv_value_2 = stat01.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat_1 - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs;
1919 let mut route = route_1.clone();
1920 route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat = recv_value_2 + 1;
1921 let (_, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[2]);
1922 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
1923 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
1924 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
1925 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1928 // split the rest to test holding cell
1929 let commit_tx_fee_3_htlcs = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 3 + 1, &channel_type_features);
1930 let additional_htlc_cost_msat = commit_tx_fee_3_htlcs - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs;
1931 let recv_value_21 = recv_value_2/2 - additional_htlc_cost_msat/2;
1932 let recv_value_22 = recv_value_2 - recv_value_21 - total_fee_msat - additional_htlc_cost_msat;
1934 let stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
1935 assert_eq!(stat.value_to_self_msat - (stat.pending_outbound_htlcs_amount_msat + recv_value_21 + recv_value_22 + total_fee_msat + total_fee_msat + commit_tx_fee_3_htlcs), stat.channel_reserve_msat);
1938 // now see if they go through on both sides
1939 let (route_21, our_payment_hash_21, our_payment_preimage_21, our_payment_secret_21) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_21);
1940 // but this will stuck in the holding cell
1941 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_21, our_payment_hash_21,
1942 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret_21), PaymentId(our_payment_hash_21.0)).unwrap();
1943 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
1944 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
1945 assert_eq!(events.len(), 0);
1947 // test with outbound holding cell amount > 0
1949 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) =
1950 get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_22);
1951 route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat += 1;
1952 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
1953 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
1954 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
1955 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1958 let (route_22, our_payment_hash_22, our_payment_preimage_22, our_payment_secret_22) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_22);
1959 // this will also stuck in the holding cell
1960 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_22, our_payment_hash_22,
1961 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret_22), PaymentId(our_payment_hash_22.0)).unwrap();
1962 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
1963 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
1964 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1966 // flush the pending htlc
1967 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_1.commitment_msg);
1968 let (as_revoke_and_ack, as_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
1969 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1971 // the pending htlc should be promoted to committed
1972 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
1973 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1974 let commitment_update_2 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1976 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_commitment_signed);
1977 let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1978 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
1979 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1981 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
1982 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1983 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1985 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
1987 let ref payment_event_11 = expect_forward!(nodes[1]);
1988 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_11.msgs[0]);
1989 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], payment_event_11.commitment_msg, false);
1991 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
1992 expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[2], our_payment_hash_1, our_payment_secret_1, recv_value_1);
1994 // flush the htlcs in the holding cell
1995 assert_eq!(commitment_update_2.update_add_htlcs.len(), 2);
1996 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update_2.update_add_htlcs[0]);
1997 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update_2.update_add_htlcs[1]);
1998 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], &commitment_update_2.commitment_signed, false);
1999 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
2001 let ref payment_event_3 = expect_forward!(nodes[1]);
2002 assert_eq!(payment_event_3.msgs.len(), 2);
2003 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_3.msgs[0]);
2004 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_3.msgs[1]);
2006 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], &payment_event_3.commitment_msg, false);
2007 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
2009 let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
2010 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
2012 Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, .. } => {
2013 assert_eq!(our_payment_hash_21, *payment_hash);
2014 assert_eq!(recv_value_21, amount_msat);
2015 assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), receiver_node_id.unwrap());
2016 assert_eq!(via_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
2018 PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
2019 assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
2020 assert_eq!(our_payment_secret_21, *payment_secret);
2022 _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
2025 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2028 Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, .. } => {
2029 assert_eq!(our_payment_hash_22, *payment_hash);
2030 assert_eq!(recv_value_22, amount_msat);
2031 assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), receiver_node_id.unwrap());
2032 assert_eq!(via_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
2034 PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
2035 assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
2036 assert_eq!(our_payment_secret_22, *payment_secret);
2038 _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
2041 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2044 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_1);
2045 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_21);
2046 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_22);
2048 let commit_tx_fee_0_htlcs = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1, &channel_type_features);
2049 let recv_value_3 = commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs - commit_tx_fee_0_htlcs - total_fee_msat;
2050 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1], &nodes[2]][..], recv_value_3);
2052 let commit_tx_fee_1_htlc = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1, &channel_type_features);
2053 let expected_value_to_self = stat01.value_to_self_msat - (recv_value_1 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_21 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_22 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_3 + total_fee_msat);
2054 let stat0 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
2055 assert_eq!(stat0.value_to_self_msat, expected_value_to_self);
2056 assert_eq!(stat0.value_to_self_msat, stat0.channel_reserve_msat + commit_tx_fee_1_htlc);
2058 let stat2 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[2], nodes[1], chan_2.2);
2059 assert_eq!(stat2.value_to_self_msat, stat22.value_to_self_msat + recv_value_1 + recv_value_21 + recv_value_22 + recv_value_3);
2063 fn channel_reserve_in_flight_removes() {
2064 // In cases where one side claims an HTLC, it thinks it has additional available funds that it
2065 // can send to its counterparty, but due to update ordering, the other side may not yet have
2066 // considered those HTLCs fully removed.
2067 // This tests that we don't count HTLCs which will not be included in the next remote
2068 // commitment transaction towards the reserve value (as it implies no commitment transaction
2069 // will be generated which violates the remote reserve value).
2070 // This was broken previously, and discovered by the chanmon_fail_consistency fuzz test.
2072 // * route two HTLCs from A to B (note that, at a high level, this test is checking that, when
2073 // you consider the values of both of these HTLCs, B may not send an HTLC back to A, but if
2074 // you only consider the value of the first HTLC, it may not),
2075 // * start routing a third HTLC from A to B,
2076 // * claim the first two HTLCs (though B will generate an update_fulfill for one, and put
2077 // the other claim in its holding cell, as it immediately goes into AwaitingRAA),
2078 // * deliver the first fulfill from B
2079 // * deliver the update_add and an RAA from A, resulting in B freeing the second holding cell
2081 // * deliver A's response CS and RAA.
2082 // This results in A having the second HTLC in AwaitingRemovedRemoteRevoke, but B having
2083 // removed it fully. B now has the push_msat plus the first two HTLCs in value.
2084 // * Now B happily sends another HTLC, potentially violating its reserve value from A's point
2085 // of view (if A counts the AwaitingRemovedRemoteRevoke HTLC).
2086 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
2087 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
2088 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
2089 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2090 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2092 let b_chan_values = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[0], chan_1.2);
2093 // Route the first two HTLCs.
2094 let payment_value_1 = b_chan_values.channel_reserve_msat - b_chan_values.value_to_self_msat - 10000;
2095 let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_value_1);
2096 let (payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 20_000);
2098 // Start routing the third HTLC (this is just used to get everyone in the right state).
2099 let (route, payment_hash_3, payment_preimage_3, payment_secret_3) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
2101 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_3,
2102 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_3), PaymentId(payment_hash_3.0)).unwrap();
2103 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2104 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
2105 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
2106 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
2109 // Now claim both of the first two HTLCs on B's end, putting B in AwaitingRAA and generating an
2110 // initial fulfill/CS.
2111 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1);
2112 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, payment_value_1);
2113 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2114 let bs_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2116 // This claim goes in B's holding cell, allowing us to have a pending B->A RAA which does not
2117 // remove the second HTLC when we send the HTLC back from B to A.
2118 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_2);
2119 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, 20_000);
2120 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2121 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
2123 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_removes.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
2124 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_removes.commitment_signed);
2125 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2126 let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2127 expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], payment_preimage_1, None, false, false);
2129 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_1.msgs[0]);
2130 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_1.commitment_msg);
2131 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2132 // B is already AwaitingRAA, so cant generate a CS here
2133 let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2135 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
2136 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2137 let bs_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2139 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
2140 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2141 let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2143 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed);
2144 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2145 let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2147 // The second HTLCis removed, but as A is in AwaitingRAA it can't generate a CS here, so the
2148 // RAA that B generated above doesn't fully resolve the second HTLC from A's point of view.
2149 // However, the RAA A generates here *does* fully resolve the HTLC from B's point of view (as A
2150 // can no longer broadcast a commitment transaction with it and B has the preimage so can go
2151 // on-chain as necessary).
2152 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_cs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
2153 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_cs.commitment_signed);
2154 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2155 let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2156 expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], payment_preimage_2, None, false, false);
2158 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
2159 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2160 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
2162 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
2163 expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_3, payment_secret_3, 100000);
2165 // Note that as this RAA was generated before the delivery of the update_fulfill it shouldn't
2166 // resolve the second HTLC from A's point of view.
2167 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
2168 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2169 expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
2170 let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2172 // Now that B doesn't have the second RAA anymore, but A still does, send a payment from B back
2173 // to A to ensure that A doesn't count the almost-removed HTLC in update_add processing.
2174 let (route, payment_hash_4, payment_preimage_4, payment_secret_4) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 10000);
2176 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_4,
2177 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_4), PaymentId(payment_hash_4.0)).unwrap();
2178 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2179 let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
2180 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
2181 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
2184 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_2.msgs[0]);
2185 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_2.commitment_msg);
2186 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2187 let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2189 // Now just resolve all the outstanding messages/HTLCs for completeness...
2191 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed);
2192 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2193 let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2195 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
2196 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2198 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
2199 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2200 expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
2201 let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2203 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed);
2204 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2205 let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2207 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
2208 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2210 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[0]);
2211 expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[0], payment_hash_4, payment_secret_4, 10000);
2213 claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], payment_preimage_4);
2214 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_3);
2218 fn channel_monitor_network_test() {
2219 // Simple test which builds a network of ChannelManagers, connects them to each other, and
2220 // tests that ChannelMonitor is able to recover from various states.
2221 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(5);
2222 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(5, &chanmon_cfgs);
2223 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(5, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None, None]);
2224 let nodes = create_network(5, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2226 // Create some initial channels
2227 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2228 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
2229 let chan_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
2230 let chan_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 4);
2232 // Make sure all nodes are at the same starting height
2233 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
2234 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
2235 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
2236 connect_blocks(&nodes[3], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[3].best_block_info().1);
2237 connect_blocks(&nodes[4], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[4].best_block_info().1);
2239 // Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels...
2240 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
2241 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
2242 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
2243 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
2245 // Simple case with no pending HTLCs:
2246 nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_1.2, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
2247 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2248 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
2250 let mut node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_1, None, HTLCType::NONE);
2251 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
2252 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &node_txn[0]);
2253 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2254 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan_1, Some(node_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::NONE);
2256 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
2257 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2258 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
2259 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2260 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2262 // One pending HTLC is discarded by the force-close:
2263 let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]], 3_000_000);
2265 // Simple case of one pending HTLC to HTLC-Timeout (note that the HTLC-Timeout is not
2266 // broadcasted until we reach the timelock time).
2267 nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_2.2, &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
2268 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
2269 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2271 let mut node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_2, None, HTLCType::NONE);
2272 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32 + 1);
2273 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_2, None, HTLCType::TIMEOUT);
2274 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &node_txn[0]);
2275 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
2276 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[2], &chan_2, Some(node_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::NONE);
2278 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
2279 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2280 assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
2281 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2282 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2284 macro_rules! claim_funds {
2285 ($node: expr, $prev_node: expr, $preimage: expr, $payment_hash: expr) => {
2287 $node.node.claim_funds($preimage);
2288 expect_payment_claimed!($node, $payment_hash, 3_000_000);
2289 check_added_monitors!($node, 1);
2291 let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
2292 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
2294 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, .. } } => {
2295 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
2296 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
2297 assert_eq!(*node_id, $prev_node.node.get_our_node_id());
2299 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2305 // nodes[3] gets the preimage, but nodes[2] already disconnected, resulting in a nodes[2]
2306 // HTLC-Timeout and a nodes[3] claim against it (+ its own announces)
2307 nodes[2].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_3.2, &nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
2308 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
2309 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
2310 let node2_commitment_txid;
2312 let node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[2], &chan_3, None, HTLCType::NONE);
2313 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32 + 1);
2314 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[2], &chan_3, None, HTLCType::TIMEOUT);
2315 node2_commitment_txid = node_txn[0].txid();
2317 // Claim the payment on nodes[3], giving it knowledge of the preimage
2318 claim_funds!(nodes[3], nodes[2], payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1);
2319 mine_transaction(&nodes[3], &node_txn[0]);
2320 check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
2321 check_preimage_claim(&nodes[3], &node_txn);
2323 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[3], true);
2324 assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2325 assert_eq!(nodes[3].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
2326 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2327 check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2329 // Drop the ChannelMonitor for the previous channel to avoid it broadcasting transactions and
2330 // confusing us in the following tests.
2331 let chan_3_mon = nodes[3].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.remove_monitor(&OutPoint { txid: chan_3.3.txid(), index: 0 });
2333 // One pending HTLC to time out:
2334 let (payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[3], &[&nodes[4]], 3_000_000);
2335 // CLTV expires at TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1 (current height) + 1 (added in send_payment for
2338 let (close_chan_update_1, close_chan_update_2) = {
2339 connect_blocks(&nodes[3], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + 1);
2340 let events = nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
2341 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
2342 let close_chan_update_1 = match events[0] {
2343 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
2346 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2349 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. }, node_id } => {
2350 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id());
2352 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2354 check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
2356 // Clear bumped claiming txn spending node 2 commitment tx. Bumped txn are generated after reaching some height timer.
2358 let mut node_txn = nodes[3].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
2359 node_txn.retain(|tx| {
2360 if tx.input[0].previous_output.txid == node2_commitment_txid {
2366 let node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[3], &chan_4, None, HTLCType::TIMEOUT);
2368 // Claim the payment on nodes[4], giving it knowledge of the preimage
2369 claim_funds!(nodes[4], nodes[3], payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2);
2371 connect_blocks(&nodes[4], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER + 2);
2372 let events = nodes[4].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
2373 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
2374 let close_chan_update_2 = match events[0] {
2375 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
2378 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2381 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. }, node_id } => {
2382 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id());
2384 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2386 check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 1);
2387 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[4], &chan_4, None, HTLCType::SUCCESS);
2389 mine_transaction(&nodes[4], &node_txn[0]);
2390 check_preimage_claim(&nodes[4], &node_txn);
2391 (close_chan_update_1, close_chan_update_2)
2393 nodes[3].gossip_sync.handle_channel_update(&close_chan_update_2).unwrap();
2394 nodes[4].gossip_sync.handle_channel_update(&close_chan_update_1).unwrap();
2395 assert_eq!(nodes[3].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2396 assert_eq!(nodes[4].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2398 assert_eq!(nodes[3].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.watch_channel(OutPoint { txid: chan_3.3.txid(), index: 0 }, chan_3_mon),
2399 ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
2400 check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2401 check_closed_event!(nodes[4], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2405 fn test_justice_tx_htlc_timeout() {
2406 // Test justice txn built on revoked HTLC-Timeout tx, against both sides
2407 let mut alice_config = UserConfig::default();
2408 alice_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
2409 alice_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
2410 alice_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 5;
2411 let mut bob_config = UserConfig::default();
2412 bob_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
2413 bob_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
2414 bob_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 3;
2415 let user_cfgs = [Some(alice_config), Some(bob_config)];
2416 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
2417 chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
2418 chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
2419 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
2420 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &user_cfgs);
2421 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2422 // Create some new channels:
2423 let chan_5 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2425 // A pending HTLC which will be revoked:
2426 let payment_preimage_3 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
2427 // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from nodes[0]
2428 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_5.2);
2429 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 2); // First commitment tx, then HTLC tx
2430 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
2431 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_5.3.txid());
2432 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // Only HTLC and output back to 0 are present
2433 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
2434 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.txid, revoked_local_txn[0].txid());
2435 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC-Timeout
2436 // Revoke the old state
2437 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_3);
2440 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2442 let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
2443 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: penalty tx
2444 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 2); // We should claim the revoked output and the HTLC output
2445 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2446 node_txn.swap_remove(0);
2448 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2449 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2450 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_5, Some(revoked_local_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::NONE);
2452 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2453 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
2454 // Verify broadcast of revoked HTLC-timeout
2455 let node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan_5, Some(revoked_local_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::TIMEOUT);
2456 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2457 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2458 // Broadcast revoked HTLC-timeout on node 1
2459 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[1]);
2460 test_revoked_htlc_claim_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], node_txn[1].clone(), revoked_local_txn[0].clone());
2462 get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
2463 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2464 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2468 fn test_justice_tx_htlc_success() {
2469 // Test justice txn built on revoked HTLC-Success tx, against both sides
2470 let mut alice_config = UserConfig::default();
2471 alice_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
2472 alice_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
2473 alice_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 5;
2474 let mut bob_config = UserConfig::default();
2475 bob_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
2476 bob_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
2477 bob_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 3;
2478 let user_cfgs = [Some(alice_config), Some(bob_config)];
2479 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
2480 chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
2481 chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
2482 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
2483 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &user_cfgs);
2484 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2485 // Create some new channels:
2486 let chan_6 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2488 // A pending HTLC which will be revoked:
2489 let payment_preimage_4 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
2490 // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from B
2491 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_6.2);
2492 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 1); // Only commitment tx
2493 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
2494 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_6.3.txid());
2495 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // Only HTLC and output back to A are present
2496 // Revoke the old state
2497 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_4);
2499 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2501 let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
2502 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: penalty tx
2503 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1); // We claim the received HTLC output
2505 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2506 node_txn.swap_remove(0);
2508 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2509 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan_6, Some(revoked_local_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::NONE);
2511 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2512 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2513 let node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_6, Some(revoked_local_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::SUCCESS);
2514 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2515 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &node_txn[1]);
2516 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2517 test_revoked_htlc_claim_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], node_txn[1].clone(), revoked_local_txn[0].clone());
2519 get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
2520 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2521 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2525 fn revoked_output_claim() {
2526 // Simple test to ensure a node will claim a revoked output when a stale remote commitment
2527 // transaction is broadcast by its counterparty
2528 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
2529 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
2530 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
2531 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2532 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2533 // node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim the revoked output
2534 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
2535 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 1);
2536 // Only output is the full channel value back to nodes[0]:
2537 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
2538 // Send a payment through, updating everyone's latest commitment txn
2539 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 5000000);
2541 // Inform nodes[1] that nodes[0] broadcast a stale tx
2542 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2543 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2544 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2545 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
2546 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: justice tx against revoked to_local output
2548 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2550 // Inform nodes[0] that a watchtower cheated on its behalf, so it will force-close the chan
2551 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2552 get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
2553 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2554 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2558 fn test_forming_justice_tx_from_monitor_updates() {
2559 do_test_forming_justice_tx_from_monitor_updates(true);
2560 do_test_forming_justice_tx_from_monitor_updates(false);
2563 fn do_test_forming_justice_tx_from_monitor_updates(broadcast_initial_commitment: bool) {
2564 // Simple test to make sure that the justice tx formed in WatchtowerPersister
2565 // is properly formed and can be broadcasted/confirmed successfully in the event
2566 // that a revoked commitment transaction is broadcasted
2567 // (Similar to `revoked_output_claim` test but we get the justice tx + broadcast manually)
2568 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
2569 let destination_script0 = chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.get_destination_script().unwrap();
2570 let destination_script1 = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_destination_script().unwrap();
2571 let persisters = vec![WatchtowerPersister::new(destination_script0),
2572 WatchtowerPersister::new(destination_script1)];
2573 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs_with_persisters(2, &chanmon_cfgs, persisters.iter().collect());
2574 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
2575 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2576 let (_, _, channel_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2577 let funding_txo = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
2579 if !broadcast_initial_commitment {
2580 // Send a payment to move the channel forward
2581 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 5_000_000);
2584 // node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim the revoked output.
2585 // We'll keep this commitment transaction to broadcast once it's revoked.
2586 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], channel_id);
2587 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 1);
2588 let revoked_commitment_tx = &revoked_local_txn[0];
2590 // Send another payment, now revoking the previous commitment tx
2591 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 5_000_000);
2593 let justice_tx = persisters[1].justice_tx(funding_txo, &revoked_commitment_tx.txid()).unwrap();
2594 check_spends!(justice_tx, revoked_commitment_tx);
2596 mine_transactions(&nodes[1], &[revoked_commitment_tx, &justice_tx]);
2597 mine_transactions(&nodes[0], &[revoked_commitment_tx, &justice_tx]);
2599 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2600 check_closed_event(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, false,
2601 &[nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100_000);
2602 get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 1, 0);
2604 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2605 check_closed_event(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, false,
2606 &[nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100_000);
2608 // Check that the justice tx has sent the revoked output value to nodes[1]
2609 let monitor = get_monitor!(nodes[1], channel_id);
2610 let total_claimable_balance = monitor.get_claimable_balances().iter().fold(0, |sum, balance| {
2612 channelmonitor::Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { amount_satoshis, .. } => sum + amount_satoshis,
2613 _ => panic!("Unexpected balance type"),
2616 // On the first commitment, node[1]'s balance was below dust so it didn't have an output
2617 let node1_channel_balance = if broadcast_initial_commitment { 0 } else { revoked_commitment_tx.output[0].value };
2618 let expected_claimable_balance = node1_channel_balance + justice_tx.output[0].value;
2619 assert_eq!(total_claimable_balance, expected_claimable_balance);
2624 fn claim_htlc_outputs_shared_tx() {
2625 // Node revoked old state, htlcs haven't time out yet, claim them in shared justice tx
2626 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
2627 chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
2628 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
2629 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
2630 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2632 // Create some new channel:
2633 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2635 // Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
2636 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8_000_000);
2637 // node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim both offered/received HTLC outputs on top of commitment tx
2638 let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
2639 let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
2641 // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from node[0]
2642 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
2643 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 2); // commitment tx + 1 HTLC-Timeout tx
2644 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
2645 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
2646 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
2647 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.txid, revoked_local_txn[0].txid());
2648 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC-Timeout
2649 check_spends!(revoked_local_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2651 //Revoke the old state
2652 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
2655 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2656 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2657 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2658 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
2659 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2660 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2661 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
2662 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
2664 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
2665 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: penalty tx
2667 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Claim the revoked output + both revoked HTLC outputs
2668 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2670 let mut witness_lens = BTreeSet::new();
2671 witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
2672 witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[1].witness.last().unwrap().len());
2673 witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[2].witness.last().unwrap().len());
2674 assert_eq!(witness_lens.len(), 3);
2675 assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(0).next().unwrap(), 77); // revoked to_local
2676 assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(1).next().unwrap(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked offered HTLC
2677 assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(2).next().unwrap(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked received HTLC
2679 // Finally, mine the penalty transaction and check that we get an HTLC failure after
2680 // ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
2681 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
2682 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
2683 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, false);
2685 get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
2686 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2687 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2691 fn claim_htlc_outputs_single_tx() {
2692 // Node revoked old state, htlcs have timed out, claim each of them in separated justice tx
2693 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
2694 chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
2695 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
2696 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
2697 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2699 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2701 // Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
2702 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8_000_000);
2703 // node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim both offered/received HTLC outputs on top of commitment tx, but this
2704 // time as two different claim transactions as we're gonna to timeout htlc with given a high current height
2705 let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
2706 let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _payment_secret_2) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
2708 // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from node[0]
2709 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
2711 //Revoke the old state
2712 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
2715 confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0], 100);
2716 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2717 confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0], 100);
2718 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2719 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2720 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
2721 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[0], events[0..1], true);
2722 match events.last().unwrap() {
2723 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
2724 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2727 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
2728 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
2730 let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
2732 // Check the pair local commitment and HTLC-timeout broadcast due to HTLC expiration
2733 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
2734 check_spends!(node_txn[0], chan_1.3);
2735 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
2736 let witness_script = node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap();
2737 assert_eq!(witness_script.len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); //Spending an offered htlc output
2738 check_spends!(node_txn[1], node_txn[0]);
2740 // Filter out any non justice transactions.
2741 node_txn.retain(|tx| tx.input[0].previous_output.txid == revoked_local_txn[0].txid());
2742 assert!(node_txn.len() > 3);
2744 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
2745 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
2746 assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input.len(), 1);
2748 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2749 check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2750 check_spends!(node_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0]);
2752 let mut witness_lens = BTreeSet::new();
2753 witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
2754 witness_lens.insert(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
2755 witness_lens.insert(node_txn[2].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
2756 assert_eq!(witness_lens.len(), 3);
2757 assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(0).next().unwrap(), 77); // revoked to_local
2758 assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(1).next().unwrap(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked offered HTLC
2759 assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(2).next().unwrap(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked received HTLC
2761 // Finally, mine the penalty transactions and check that we get an HTLC failure after
2762 // ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
2763 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
2764 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[1]);
2765 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[2]);
2766 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
2767 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, false);
2769 get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
2770 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2771 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
2775 fn test_htlc_on_chain_success() {
2776 // Test that in case of a unilateral close onchain, we detect the state of output and pass
2777 // the preimage backward accordingly. So here we test that ChannelManager is
2778 // broadcasting the right event to other nodes in payment path.
2779 // We test with two HTLCs simultaneously as that was not handled correctly in the past.
2780 // A --------------------> B ----------------------> C (preimage)
2781 // First, C should claim the HTLC outputs via HTLC-Success when its own latest local
2782 // commitment transaction was broadcast.
2783 // Then, B should learn the preimage from said transactions, attempting to claim backwards
2785 // B should be able to claim via preimage if A then broadcasts its local tx.
2786 // Finally, when A sees B's latest local commitment transaction it should be able to claim
2787 // the HTLC outputs via the preimage it learned (which, once confirmed should generate a
2788 // PaymentSent event).
2790 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
2791 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
2792 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
2793 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2795 // Create some initial channels
2796 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
2797 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
2799 // Ensure all nodes are at the same height
2800 let node_max_height = nodes.iter().map(|node| node.blocks.lock().unwrap().len()).max().unwrap() as u32;
2801 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_max_height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
2802 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_max_height - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
2803 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], node_max_height - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
2805 // Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels...
2806 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
2807 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
2809 let (our_payment_preimage, payment_hash_1, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3_000_000);
2810 let (our_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _payment_secret_2) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3_000_000);
2812 // Broadcast legit commitment tx from C on B's chain
2813 // Broadcast HTLC Success transaction by C on received output from C's commitment tx on B's chain
2814 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
2815 assert_eq!(commitment_tx.len(), 1);
2816 check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_2.3);
2817 nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
2818 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], payment_hash_1, 3_000_000);
2819 nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage_2);
2820 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], payment_hash_2, 3_000_000);
2821 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 2);
2822 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2823 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
2824 assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
2825 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
2826 assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
2828 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &commitment_tx[0]);
2829 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
2830 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
2831 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2832 let node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone(); // ChannelMonitor: 2 (2 * HTLC-Success tx)
2833 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2);
2834 check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
2835 check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_tx[0]);
2836 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2837 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2838 assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
2839 assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
2840 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0);
2841 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].lock_time.0, 0);
2843 // Verify that B's ChannelManager is able to extract preimage from HTLC Success tx and pass it backward
2844 connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![commitment_tx[0].clone(), node_txn[0].clone(), node_txn[1].clone()]));
2845 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
2847 let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
2848 assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
2849 assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0.txid, chan_2.3.txid());
2850 added_monitors.clear();
2852 let forwarded_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
2853 assert_eq!(forwarded_events.len(), 3);
2854 match forwarded_events[0] {
2855 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
2856 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2858 let chan_id = Some(chan_1.2);
2859 match forwarded_events[1] {
2860 Event::PaymentForwarded { fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx, next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat } => {
2861 assert_eq!(fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
2862 assert_eq!(prev_channel_id, chan_id);
2863 assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, true);
2864 assert_eq!(next_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
2865 assert_eq!(outbound_amount_forwarded_msat, Some(3000000));
2869 match forwarded_events[2] {
2870 Event::PaymentForwarded { fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx, next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat } => {
2871 assert_eq!(fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
2872 assert_eq!(prev_channel_id, chan_id);
2873 assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, true);
2874 assert_eq!(next_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
2875 assert_eq!(outbound_amount_forwarded_msat, Some(3000000));
2879 let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
2881 let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
2882 assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 2);
2883 assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
2884 assert_eq!(added_monitors[1].0.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
2885 added_monitors.clear();
2887 assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
2889 let nodes_2_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
2890 let nodes_0_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
2892 match nodes_2_event {
2893 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. }, node_id: _ } => {},
2894 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2897 match nodes_0_event {
2898 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
2899 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
2900 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
2901 assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
2902 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
2903 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
2905 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2908 // Ensure that the last remaining message event is the BroadcastChannelUpdate msg for chan_2
2910 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
2911 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
2914 macro_rules! check_tx_local_broadcast {
2915 ($node: expr, $htlc_offered: expr, $commitment_tx: expr) => { {
2916 let mut node_txn = $node.tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
2917 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2);
2918 // Node[1]: 2 * HTLC-timeout tx
2919 // Node[0]: 2 * HTLC-timeout tx
2920 check_spends!(node_txn[0], $commitment_tx);
2921 check_spends!(node_txn[1], $commitment_tx);
2922 assert_ne!(node_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0);
2923 assert_ne!(node_txn[1].lock_time.0, 0);
2925 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2926 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2927 assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
2928 assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
2930 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2931 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2932 assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
2933 assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
2938 // nodes[1] now broadcasts its own timeout-claim of the output that nodes[2] just claimed via success.
2939 check_tx_local_broadcast!(nodes[1], false, commitment_tx[0]);
2941 // Broadcast legit commitment tx from A on B's chain
2942 // Broadcast preimage tx by B on offered output from A commitment tx on A's chain
2943 let node_a_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
2944 check_spends!(node_a_commitment_tx[0], chan_1.3);
2945 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_a_commitment_tx[0]);
2946 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
2947 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2948 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
2949 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
2950 assert!(node_txn.len() == 1 || node_txn.len() == 3); // HTLC-Success, 2* RBF bumps of above HTLC txn
2951 let commitment_spend =
2952 if node_txn.len() == 1 {
2955 // Certain `ConnectStyle`s will cause RBF bumps of the previous HTLC transaction to be broadcast.
2956 // FullBlockViaListen
2957 if node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid == node_a_commitment_tx[0].txid() {
2958 check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_tx[0]);
2959 check_spends!(node_txn[2], commitment_tx[0]);
2960 assert_ne!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout, node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output.vout);
2963 check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
2964 check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_tx[0]);
2965 assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout);
2970 check_spends!(commitment_spend, node_a_commitment_tx[0]);
2971 assert_eq!(commitment_spend.input.len(), 2);
2972 assert_eq!(commitment_spend.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2973 assert_eq!(commitment_spend.input[1].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
2974 assert_eq!(commitment_spend.lock_time.0, nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
2975 assert!(commitment_spend.output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
2976 // We don't bother to check that B can claim the HTLC output on its commitment tx here as
2977 // we already checked the same situation with A.
2979 // Verify that A's ChannelManager is able to extract preimage from preimage tx and generate PaymentSent
2980 connect_block(&nodes[0], &create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![node_a_commitment_tx[0].clone(), commitment_spend.clone()]));
2981 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
2982 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
2983 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2984 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
2985 assert_eq!(events.len(), 5);
2986 let mut first_claimed = false;
2987 for event in events {
2989 Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash, .. } => {
2990 if payment_preimage == our_payment_preimage && payment_hash == payment_hash_1 {
2991 assert!(!first_claimed);
2992 first_claimed = true;
2994 assert_eq!(payment_preimage, our_payment_preimage_2);
2995 assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_2);
2998 Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {},
2999 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {},
3000 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3003 check_tx_local_broadcast!(nodes[0], true, node_a_commitment_tx[0]);
3006 fn do_test_htlc_on_chain_timeout(connect_style: ConnectStyle) {
3007 // Test that in case of a unilateral close onchain, we detect the state of output and
3008 // timeout the HTLC backward accordingly. So here we test that ChannelManager is
3009 // broadcasting the right event to other nodes in payment path.
3010 // A ------------------> B ----------------------> C (timeout)
3011 // B's commitment tx C's commitment tx
3013 // B's HTLC timeout tx B's timeout tx
3015 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
3016 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
3017 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
3018 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3019 *nodes[0].connect_style.borrow_mut() = connect_style;
3020 *nodes[1].connect_style.borrow_mut() = connect_style;
3021 *nodes[2].connect_style.borrow_mut() = connect_style;
3023 // Create some intial channels
3024 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
3025 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
3027 // Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment thorugh all the channels...
3028 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
3029 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
3031 let (_payment_preimage, payment_hash, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), 3000000);
3033 // Broadcast legit commitment tx from C on B's chain
3034 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
3035 check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_2.3);
3036 nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash);
3037 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
3038 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash.clone() }]);
3039 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3041 let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3042 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
3044 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
3045 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3046 assert!(!update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
3047 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3048 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3049 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
3051 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3053 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &commitment_tx[0]);
3054 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
3055 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3056 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
3057 let node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
3058 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 0);
3060 // Broadcast timeout transaction by B on received output from C's commitment tx on B's chain
3061 // Verify that B's ChannelManager is able to detect that HTLC is timeout by its own tx and react backward in consequence
3062 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx[0]);
3063 check_closed_event!(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, false
3064 , [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
3065 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 200 - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
3067 let mut txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
3068 if nodes[1].connect_style.borrow().skips_blocks() {
3069 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1);
3071 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 3); // Two extra fee bumps for timeout transaction
3073 txn.iter().for_each(|tx| check_spends!(tx, commitment_tx[0]));
3074 assert_eq!(txn[0].clone().input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
3078 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &timeout_tx);
3079 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3080 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
3082 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
3084 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
3085 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3086 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3087 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
3089 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
3090 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3091 assert!(!update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
3092 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3093 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3094 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
3096 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3099 // Broadcast legit commitment tx from B on A's chain
3100 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_1.2);
3101 check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_1.3);
3103 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &commitment_tx[0]);
3104 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
3106 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
3107 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3108 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
3109 let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone(); // 1 timeout tx
3110 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
3111 check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
3112 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].clone().input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
3116 fn test_htlc_on_chain_timeout() {
3117 do_test_htlc_on_chain_timeout(ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstSkippingBlocks);
3118 do_test_htlc_on_chain_timeout(ConnectStyle::TransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks);
3119 do_test_htlc_on_chain_timeout(ConnectStyle::FullBlockViaListen);
3123 fn test_simple_commitment_revoked_fail_backward() {
3124 // Test that in case of a revoked commitment tx, we detect the resolution of output by justice tx
3125 // and fail backward accordingly.
3127 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
3128 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
3129 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
3130 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3132 // Create some initial channels
3133 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
3134 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
3136 let (payment_preimage, _payment_hash, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3000000);
3137 // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from nodes[2]
3138 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
3139 // Revoke the old state
3140 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage);
3142 let (_, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3000000);
3144 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
3145 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
3146 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
3147 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3148 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
3150 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
3151 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3152 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3153 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
3155 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref commitment_signed, .. } } => {
3156 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3157 assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
3158 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3159 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3160 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
3162 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[0]);
3163 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false, true);
3164 expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, true);
3166 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3170 fn do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(deliver_bs_raa: bool, use_dust: bool, no_to_remote: bool) {
3171 // Test that if our counterparty broadcasts a revoked commitment transaction we fail all
3172 // pending HTLCs on that channel backwards even if the HTLCs aren't present in our latest
3173 // commitment transaction anymore.
3174 // To do this, we have the peer which will broadcast a revoked commitment transaction send
3175 // a number of update_fail/commitment_signed updates without ever sending the RAA in
3176 // response to our commitment_signed. This is somewhat misbehavior-y, though not
3177 // technically disallowed and we should probably handle it reasonably.
3178 // Note that this is pretty exhaustive as an outbound HTLC which we haven't yet
3179 // failed/fulfilled backwards must be in at least one of the latest two remote commitment
3181 // * Once we move it out of our holding cell/add it, we will immediately include it in a
3182 // commitment_signed (implying it will be in the latest remote commitment transaction).
3183 // * Once they remove it, we will send a (the first) commitment_signed without the HTLC,
3184 // and once they revoke the previous commitment transaction (allowing us to send a new
3185 // commitment_signed) we will be free to fail/fulfill the HTLC backwards.
3186 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
3187 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
3188 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
3189 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3191 // Create some initial channels
3192 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
3193 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
3195 let (payment_preimage, _payment_hash, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], if no_to_remote { 10_000 } else { 3_000_000 });
3196 // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from nodes[2]
3197 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
3198 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), if no_to_remote { 1 } else { 2 });
3199 // Revoke the old state
3200 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage);
3202 let value = if use_dust {
3203 // The dust limit applied to HTLC outputs considers the fee of the HTLC transaction as
3204 // well, so HTLCs at exactly the dust limit will not be included in commitment txn.
3205 nodes[2].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id())
3206 .unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan_2.2).unwrap().context.holder_dust_limit_satoshis * 1000
3209 let (_, first_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], value);
3210 let (_, second_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], value);
3211 let (_, third_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], value);
3213 nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&first_payment_hash);
3214 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: first_payment_hash }]);
3215 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3216 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3217 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3218 assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3219 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3220 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
3221 assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
3222 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
3223 let bs_raa = commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], updates.commitment_signed, false, true, false, true);
3224 // Drop the last RAA from 3 -> 2
3226 nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&second_payment_hash);
3227 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: second_payment_hash }]);
3228 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3229 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3230 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3231 assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3232 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3233 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
3234 assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
3235 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
3236 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.commitment_signed);
3237 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3238 // Note that nodes[1] is in AwaitingRAA, so won't send a CS
3239 let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
3240 nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
3241 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3243 nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&third_payment_hash);
3244 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: third_payment_hash }]);
3245 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3246 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3247 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3248 assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3249 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3250 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
3251 assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
3252 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
3253 // At this point first_payment_hash has dropped out of the latest two commitment
3254 // transactions that nodes[1] is tracking...
3255 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.commitment_signed);
3256 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3257 // Note that nodes[1] is (still) in AwaitingRAA, so won't send a CS
3258 let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
3259 nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
3260 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3262 // Add a fourth HTLC, this one will get sequestered away in nodes[1]'s holding cell waiting
3263 // on nodes[2]'s RAA.
3264 let (route, fourth_payment_hash, _, fourth_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 1000000);
3265 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, fourth_payment_hash,
3266 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(fourth_payment_secret), PaymentId(fourth_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
3267 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
3268 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
3269 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
3272 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
3273 // One monitor for the new revocation preimage, no second on as we won't generate a new
3274 // commitment transaction for nodes[0] until process_pending_htlc_forwards().
3275 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3276 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3277 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
3279 Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
3280 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3283 Event::HTLCHandlingFailed { .. } => { },
3284 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3286 // Deliberately don't process the pending fail-back so they all fail back at once after
3287 // block connection just like the !deliver_bs_raa case
3290 let mut failed_htlcs = HashSet::new();
3291 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
3293 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
3294 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3295 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
3297 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3298 assert_eq!(events.len(), if deliver_bs_raa { 3 + nodes.len() - 1 } else { 4 + nodes.len() });
3300 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => { },
3301 _ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
3304 Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
3305 assert_eq!(*payment_hash, fourth_payment_hash);
3307 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3310 Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
3311 assert_eq!(*payment_hash, fourth_payment_hash);
3313 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3316 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
3317 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3319 let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3320 assert_eq!(events.len(), if deliver_bs_raa { 4 } else { 3 });
3323 let nodes_2_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
3324 match nodes_2_event {
3325 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
3326 assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
3327 assert_eq!(update_add_htlcs.len(), 1);
3328 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3329 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
3330 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3332 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3336 let nodes_2_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
3337 match nodes_2_event {
3338 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { msg: msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id, ref data } }, node_id: _ } => {
3339 assert_eq!(channel_id, chan_2.2);
3340 assert_eq!(data.as_str(), "Channel closed because commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain.");
3342 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3345 let nodes_0_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
3346 match nodes_0_event {
3347 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref commitment_signed, .. } } => {
3348 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3349 assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 3);
3350 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
3351 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3352 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
3354 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[0]);
3355 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[1]);
3356 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[2]);
3358 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false, true);
3360 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3361 assert_eq!(events.len(), 6);
3363 Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref failure, .. } => {
3364 assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
3365 // If we delivered B's RAA we got an unknown preimage error, not something
3366 // that we should update our routing table for.
3367 if !deliver_bs_raa {
3368 if let PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) } = failure { } else { panic!("Unexpected path failure") }
3371 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3374 Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
3375 assert_eq!(*payment_hash, first_payment_hash);
3377 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3380 Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) }, .. } => {
3381 assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
3383 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3386 Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
3387 assert_eq!(*payment_hash, second_payment_hash);
3389 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3392 Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) }, .. } => {
3393 assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
3395 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3398 Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
3399 assert_eq!(*payment_hash, third_payment_hash);
3401 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3404 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3407 // Ensure that the last remaining message event is the BroadcastChannelUpdate msg for chan_2
3409 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { msg: msgs::ChannelUpdate { .. } } => {},
3410 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3413 assert!(failed_htlcs.contains(&first_payment_hash.0));
3414 assert!(failed_htlcs.contains(&second_payment_hash.0));
3415 assert!(failed_htlcs.contains(&third_payment_hash.0));
3419 fn test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive_a() {
3420 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(false, true, false);
3421 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(true, true, false);
3422 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(false, false, false);
3423 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(true, false, false);
3427 fn test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive_b() {
3428 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(false, true, true);
3429 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(true, true, true);
3430 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(false, false, true);
3431 do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(true, false, true);
3435 fn fail_backward_pending_htlc_upon_channel_failure() {
3436 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
3437 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
3438 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
3439 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3440 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 500_000_000);
3442 // Alice -> Bob: Route a payment but without Bob sending revoke_and_ack.
3444 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 50_000);
3445 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret),
3446 PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
3447 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3449 let payment_event = {
3450 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3451 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
3452 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
3454 assert_eq!(payment_event.node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3455 assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
3458 // Alice -> Bob: Route another payment but now Alice waits for Bob's earlier revoke_and_ack.
3459 let (route, failed_payment_hash, _, failed_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 50_000);
3461 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, failed_payment_hash,
3462 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(failed_payment_secret), PaymentId(failed_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
3463 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
3465 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
3468 // Alice <- Bob: Send a malformed update_add_htlc so Alice fails the channel.
3470 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 50_000);
3472 let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
3473 let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
3474 let current_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
3475 let (onion_payloads, _amount_msat, cltv_expiry) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(
3476 &route.paths[0], 50_000, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), current_height, &None).unwrap();
3477 let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
3478 let onion_routing_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash).unwrap();
3480 // Send a 0-msat update_add_htlc to fail the channel.
3481 let update_add_htlc = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
3487 onion_routing_packet,
3488 skimmed_fee_msat: None,
3490 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_add_htlc);
3492 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3493 assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
3494 // Check that Alice fails backward the pending HTLC from the second payment.
3496 Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
3497 assert_eq!(payment_hash, failed_payment_hash);
3499 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3502 Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
3503 assert_eq!(payment_hash, failed_payment_hash);
3505 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3508 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::ProcessingError { ref err }, .. } => {
3509 assert_eq!(err, "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC");
3511 _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events[1]),
3513 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
3514 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3518 fn test_htlc_ignore_latest_remote_commitment() {
3519 // Test that HTLC transactions spending the latest remote commitment transaction are simply
3520 // ignored if we cannot claim them. This originally tickled an invalid unwrap().
3521 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
3522 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
3523 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
3524 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3525 if *nodes[1].connect_style.borrow() == ConnectStyle::FullBlockViaListen {
3526 // We rely on the ability to connect a block redundantly, which isn't allowed via
3527 // `chain::Listen`, so we never run the test if we randomly get assigned that
3531 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
3533 route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 10000000);
3534 nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
3535 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + 1);
3536 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
3537 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3538 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
3540 let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
3541 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 3);
3542 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].txid(), node_txn[1].txid());
3544 let block = create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![node_txn[0].clone(), node_txn[1].clone()]);
3545 connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
3546 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
3547 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3548 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
3550 // Duplicate the connect_block call since this may happen due to other listeners
3551 // registering new transactions
3552 connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
3556 fn test_force_close_fail_back() {
3557 // Check which HTLCs are failed-backwards on channel force-closure
3558 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
3559 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
3560 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
3561 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3562 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
3563 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
3565 let (route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 1000000);
3567 let mut payment_event = {
3568 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
3569 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
3570 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3572 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3573 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
3574 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
3577 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
3578 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
3580 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
3582 let mut events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3583 assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
3584 payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events_2.remove(0));
3585 assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
3587 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3588 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
3589 nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg);
3590 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3591 let (_, _) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3593 // nodes[2] now has the latest commitment transaction, but hasn't revoked its previous
3594 // state or updated nodes[1]' state. Now force-close and broadcast that commitment/HTLC
3595 // transaction and ensure nodes[1] doesn't fail-backwards (this was originally a bug!).
3597 nodes[2].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&payment_event.commitment_msg.channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
3598 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
3599 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
3600 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
3602 let mut node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
3603 // Note that we don't bother broadcasting the HTLC-Success transaction here as we don't
3604 // have a use for it unless nodes[2] learns the preimage somehow, the funds will go
3605 // back to nodes[1] upon timeout otherwise.
3606 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
3610 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &tx);
3612 // Note no UpdateHTLCs event here from nodes[1] to nodes[0]!
3613 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
3614 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3615 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
3617 // Now check that if we add the preimage to ChannelMonitor it broadcasts our HTLC-Success..
3619 get_monitor!(nodes[2], payment_event.commitment_msg.channel_id)
3620 .provide_payment_preimage(&our_payment_hash, &our_payment_preimage, &node_cfgs[2].tx_broadcaster, &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(node_cfgs[2].fee_estimator), &node_cfgs[2].logger);
3622 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &tx);
3623 let node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
3624 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
3625 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
3626 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, tx.txid());
3627 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0); // Must be an HTLC-Success
3628 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.len(), 5); // Must be an HTLC-Success
3630 check_spends!(node_txn[0], tx);
3634 fn test_dup_events_on_peer_disconnect() {
3635 // Test that if we receive a duplicative update_fulfill_htlc message after a reconnect we do
3636 // not generate a corresponding duplicative PaymentSent event. This did not use to be the case
3637 // as we used to generate the event immediately upon receipt of the payment preimage in the
3638 // update_fulfill_htlc message.
3640 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
3641 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
3642 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
3643 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3644 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
3646 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000);
3648 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
3649 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 1_000_000);
3650 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3651 let claim_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3652 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &claim_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
3653 expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], payment_preimage, None, false, false);
3655 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3656 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3658 let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
3659 reconnect_args.pending_htlc_claims.0 = 1;
3660 reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
3661 expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
3665 fn test_peer_disconnected_before_funding_broadcasted() {
3666 // Test that channels are closed with `ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer` if the peer disconnects
3667 // before the funding transaction has been broadcasted.
3668 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
3669 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
3670 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
3671 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3673 // Open a channel between `nodes[0]` and `nodes[1]`, for which the funding transaction is never
3674 // broadcasted, even though it's created by `nodes[0]`.
3675 let expected_temporary_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 500_000_000, 42, None).unwrap();
3676 let open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3677 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel);
3678 let accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3679 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel);
3681 let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 42);
3682 assert_eq!(temporary_channel_id, expected_temporary_channel_id);
3684 assert!(nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).is_ok());
3686 let funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3687 assert_eq!(funding_created_msg.temporary_channel_id, expected_temporary_channel_id);
3689 // Even though the funding transaction is created by `nodes[0]`, the `FundingCreated` msg is
3690 // never sent to `nodes[1]`, and therefore the tx is never signed by either party nor
3693 assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 0);
3696 // Ensure that the channel is closed with `ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer` when the peers are
3697 // disconnected before the funding transaction was broadcasted.
3698 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3699 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3701 check_closed_event!(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer, false
3702 , [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
3703 check_closed_event!(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer, false
3704 , [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
3708 fn test_simple_peer_disconnect() {
3709 // Test that we can reconnect when there are no lost messages
3710 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
3711 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
3712 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
3713 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3714 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
3715 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
3717 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3718 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3719 let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
3720 reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
3721 reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
3723 let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).0;
3724 let payment_hash_2 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).1;
3725 fail_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_hash_2);
3726 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_preimage_1);
3728 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3729 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3730 reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
3732 let (payment_preimage_3, payment_hash_3, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000);
3733 let payment_preimage_4 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).0;
3734 let payment_hash_5 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).1;
3735 let payment_hash_6 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).1;
3737 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3738 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3740 claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], true, payment_preimage_3);
3741 fail_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], true, payment_hash_5);
3743 let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
3744 reconnect_args.pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 = 1;
3745 reconnect_args.pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 = 1;
3746 reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
3748 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3749 assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
3751 Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash, .. } => {
3752 assert_eq!(payment_preimage, payment_preimage_3);
3753 assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_3);
3755 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3758 Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {},
3759 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3762 Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, .. } => {
3763 assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_5);
3764 assert!(payment_failed_permanently);
3766 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3769 Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
3770 assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_5);
3772 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3775 check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
3777 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_preimage_4);
3778 fail_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_hash_6);
3781 fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken_lnd: bool) {
3782 // Test that we can reconnect when in-flight HTLC updates get dropped
3783 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
3784 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
3785 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
3786 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
3788 let mut as_channel_ready = None;
3789 let channel_id = if messages_delivered == 0 {
3790 let (channel_ready, chan_id, _) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_a(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 100000, 10001);
3791 as_channel_ready = Some(channel_ready);
3792 // nodes[1] doesn't receive the channel_ready message (it'll be re-sent on reconnect)
3793 // Note that we store it so that if we're running with `simulate_broken_lnd` we can deliver
3794 // it before the channel_reestablish message.
3797 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).2
3800 let (route, payment_hash_1, payment_preimage_1, payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1_000_000);
3802 let payment_event = {
3803 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_1,
3804 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_1), PaymentId(payment_hash_1.0)).unwrap();
3805 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3807 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3808 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
3809 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
3811 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), payment_event.node_id);
3813 if messages_delivered < 2 {
3814 // Drop the payment_event messages, and let them get re-generated in reconnect_nodes!
3816 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
3817 if messages_delivered >= 3 {
3818 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg);
3819 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3820 let (bs_revoke_and_ack, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3822 if messages_delivered >= 4 {
3823 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
3824 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
3825 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3827 if messages_delivered >= 5 {
3828 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed);
3829 let as_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3830 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
3831 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3833 if messages_delivered >= 6 {
3834 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
3835 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
3836 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3843 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3844 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3845 if messages_delivered < 3 {
3846 if simulate_broken_lnd {
3847 // lnd has a long-standing bug where they send a channel_ready prior to a
3848 // channel_reestablish if you reconnect prior to channel_ready time.
3850 // Here we simulate that behavior, delivering a channel_ready immediately on
3851 // reconnect. Note that we don't bother skipping the now-duplicate channel_ready sent
3852 // in `reconnect_nodes` but we currently don't fail based on that.
3854 // See-also <https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/4006>
3855 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_ready(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_channel_ready.as_ref().unwrap().0);
3857 // Even if the channel_ready messages get exchanged, as long as nothing further was
3858 // received on either side, both sides will need to resend them.
3859 let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
3860 reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
3861 reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.1 = 1;
3862 reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
3863 } else if messages_delivered == 3 {
3864 // nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed
3865 let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
3866 reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.0 = -1;
3867 reconnect_args.pending_raa.0 = true;
3868 reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
3869 } else if messages_delivered == 4 {
3870 // nodes[0] still wants its commitment_signed
3871 let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
3872 reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.0 = -1;
3873 reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
3874 } else if messages_delivered == 5 {
3875 // nodes[1] still wants its final RAA
3876 let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
3877 reconnect_args.pending_raa.1 = true;
3878 reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
3879 } else if messages_delivered == 6 {
3880 // Everything was delivered...
3881 reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
3884 let events_1 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3885 if messages_delivered == 0 {
3886 assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 2);
3888 Event::ChannelReady { .. } => { },
3889 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3892 Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
3893 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3896 assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 1);
3898 Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
3899 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3903 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3904 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3905 reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
3907 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
3909 let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3910 assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
3912 Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, .. } => {
3913 assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash);
3914 assert_eq!(amount_msat, 1_000_000);
3915 assert_eq!(receiver_node_id.unwrap(), nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3916 assert_eq!(via_channel_id, Some(channel_id));
3918 PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
3919 assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
3920 assert_eq!(payment_secret_1, *payment_secret);
3922 _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
3925 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3928 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1);
3929 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3930 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, 1_000_000);
3932 let events_3 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
3933 assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
3934 let (update_fulfill_htlc, commitment_signed) = match events_3[0] {
3935 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, ref updates } => {
3936 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3937 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
3938 assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
3939 assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
3940 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
3941 assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
3942 (updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0].clone(), updates.commitment_signed.clone())
3944 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3947 if messages_delivered >= 1 {
3948 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fulfill_htlc);
3950 let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
3951 assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
3953 Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, .. } => {
3954 assert_eq!(payment_preimage_1, *payment_preimage);
3955 assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash);
3957 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
3960 if messages_delivered >= 2 {
3961 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
3962 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3963 let (as_revoke_and_ack, as_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3965 if messages_delivered >= 3 {
3966 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
3967 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
3968 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3970 if messages_delivered >= 4 {
3971 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_commitment_signed);
3972 let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3973 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
3974 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
3976 if messages_delivered >= 5 {
3977 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
3978 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
3979 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
3986 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
3987 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
3988 if messages_delivered < 2 {
3989 let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
3990 reconnect_args.pending_htlc_claims.0 = 1;
3991 reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
3992 if messages_delivered < 1 {
3993 expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
3995 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
3997 } else if messages_delivered == 2 {
3998 // nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed
3999 let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
4000 reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.1 = -1;
4001 reconnect_args.pending_raa.1 = true;
4002 reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
4003 } else if messages_delivered == 3 {
4004 // nodes[0] still wants its commitment_signed
4005 let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
4006 reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.1 = -1;
4007 reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
4008 } else if messages_delivered == 4 {
4009 // nodes[1] still wants its final RAA
4010 let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
4011 reconnect_args.pending_raa.0 = true;
4012 reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
4013 } else if messages_delivered == 5 {
4014 // Everything was delivered...
4015 reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
4018 if messages_delivered == 1 || messages_delivered == 2 {
4019 expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
4021 if messages_delivered <= 5 {
4022 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
4023 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4025 reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
4027 if messages_delivered > 2 {
4028 expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
4031 // Channel should still work fine...
4032 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
4033 let payment_preimage_2 = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 1000000).0;
4034 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2);
4038 fn test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect_a() {
4039 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(0, true);
4040 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(0, false);
4041 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(1, false);
4042 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(2, false);
4046 fn test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect_b() {
4047 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(3, false);
4048 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(4, false);
4049 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(5, false);
4050 do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(6, false);
4054 fn test_channel_ready_without_best_block_updated() {
4055 // Previously, if we were offline when a funding transaction was locked in, and then we came
4056 // back online, calling best_block_updated once followed by transactions_confirmed, we'd not
4057 // generate a channel_ready until a later best_block_updated. This tests that we generate the
4058 // channel_ready immediately instead.
4059 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4060 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4061 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4062 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4063 *nodes[0].connect_style.borrow_mut() = ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstSkippingBlocks;
4065 let funding_tx = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_init(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 1_000_000, 0);
4067 let conf_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1;
4068 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH);
4069 let block_txn = [funding_tx];
4070 let conf_txn: Vec<_> = block_txn.iter().enumerate().collect();
4071 let conf_block_header = nodes[0].get_block_header(conf_height);
4072 nodes[0].node.transactions_confirmed(&conf_block_header, &conf_txn[..], conf_height);
4074 // Ensure nodes[0] generates a channel_ready after the transactions_confirmed
4075 let as_channel_ready = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReady, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
4076 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_ready(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_channel_ready);
4080 fn test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect_dual_htlc() {
4081 // Test that we can handle reconnecting when both sides of a channel have pending
4082 // commitment_updates when we disconnect.
4083 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4084 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4085 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4086 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4087 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4089 let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000);
4091 // Now try to send a second payment which will fail to send
4092 let (route, payment_hash_2, payment_preimage_2, payment_secret_2) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
4093 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_2,
4094 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_2), PaymentId(payment_hash_2.0)).unwrap();
4095 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4097 let events_1 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4098 assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 1);
4100 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
4101 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4104 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1);
4105 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, 1_000_000);
4106 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4108 let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4109 assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
4111 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
4112 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4113 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4114 assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
4115 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
4116 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4117 assert!(update_fee.is_none());
4119 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
4120 let events_3 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
4121 assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
4123 Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, .. } => {
4124 assert_eq!(*payment_preimage, payment_preimage_1);
4125 assert_eq!(*payment_hash, payment_hash_1);
4127 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4130 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
4131 let _ = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
4132 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
4133 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4135 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4138 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
4139 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4141 nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
4142 features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
4144 let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
4145 assert_eq!(reestablish_1.len(), 1);
4146 nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
4147 features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
4149 let reestablish_2 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
4150 assert_eq!(reestablish_2.len(), 1);
4152 nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[0]);
4153 let as_resp = handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
4154 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[0]);
4155 let bs_resp = handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
4157 assert!(as_resp.0.is_none());
4158 assert!(bs_resp.0.is_none());
4160 assert!(bs_resp.1.is_none());
4161 assert!(bs_resp.2.is_none());
4163 assert!(as_resp.3 == RAACommitmentOrder::CommitmentFirst);
4165 assert_eq!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_add_htlcs.len(), 1);
4166 assert!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
4167 assert!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
4168 assert!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4169 assert!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_fee.is_none());
4170 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_add_htlcs[0]);
4171 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().commitment_signed);
4172 let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4173 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
4174 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4176 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), as_resp.1.as_ref().unwrap());
4177 let bs_second_commitment_signed = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4178 assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4179 assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
4180 assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
4181 assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4182 assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_fee.is_none());
4183 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4185 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
4186 let as_commitment_signed = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
4187 assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4188 assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
4189 assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
4190 assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4191 assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_fee.is_none());
4192 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4194 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_commitment_signed.commitment_signed);
4195 let as_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
4196 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
4197 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4199 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_commitment_signed.commitment_signed);
4200 let bs_second_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4201 // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
4202 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4204 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
4205 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
4206 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4208 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
4210 let events_5 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
4211 assert_eq!(events_5.len(), 1);
4213 Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, .. } => {
4214 assert_eq!(payment_hash_2, *payment_hash);
4216 PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
4217 assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
4218 assert_eq!(payment_secret_2, *payment_secret);
4220 _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
4223 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4226 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_revoke_and_ack);
4227 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
4228 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4230 expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
4231 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2);
4234 fn do_test_htlc_timeout(send_partial_mpp: bool) {
4235 // If the user fails to claim/fail an HTLC within the HTLC CLTV timeout we fail it for them
4236 // to avoid our counterparty failing the channel.
4237 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4238 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4239 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4240 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4242 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4244 let our_payment_hash = if send_partial_mpp {
4245 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(&nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
4246 // Use the utility function send_payment_along_path to send the payment with MPP data which
4247 // indicates there are more HTLCs coming.
4248 let cur_height = CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1; // route_payment calls send_payment, which adds 1 to the current height. So we do the same here to match.
4249 let payment_id = PaymentId([42; 32]);
4250 let session_privs = nodes[0].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(our_payment_hash,
4251 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), payment_id, &route).unwrap();
4252 nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &our_payment_hash,
4253 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), 200_000, cur_height, payment_id,
4254 &None, session_privs[0]).unwrap();
4255 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4256 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4257 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
4258 // Now do the relevant commitment_signed/RAA dances along the path, noting that the final
4259 // hop should *not* yet generate any PaymentClaimable event(s).
4260 pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100000, our_payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), events.drain(..).next().unwrap(), false, None);
4263 route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100000).1
4266 let mut block = create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), 42, Vec::new());
4267 connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
4268 connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
4269 let block_count = TEST_FINAL_CLTV + CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 2 - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS;
4270 for _ in CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 2..block_count {
4271 block.header.prev_blockhash = block.block_hash();
4272 connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
4273 connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
4276 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
4278 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4279 let htlc_timeout_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4280 assert!(htlc_timeout_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4281 assert_eq!(htlc_timeout_updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
4282 assert!(htlc_timeout_updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4283 assert!(htlc_timeout_updates.update_fee.is_none());
4285 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_timeout_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
4286 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], htlc_timeout_updates.commitment_signed, false);
4287 // 100_000 msat as u64, followed by the height at which we failed back above
4288 let mut expected_failure_data = (100_000 as u64).to_be_bytes().to_vec();
4289 expected_failure_data.extend_from_slice(&(block_count - 1).to_be_bytes());
4290 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, 0x4000 | 15, &expected_failure_data[..]);
4294 fn test_htlc_timeout() {
4295 do_test_htlc_timeout(true);
4296 do_test_htlc_timeout(false);
4299 fn do_test_holding_cell_htlc_add_timeouts(forwarded_htlc: bool) {
4300 // Tests that HTLCs in the holding cell are timed out after the requisite number of blocks.
4301 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
4302 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
4303 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
4304 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4305 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4306 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
4308 // Make sure all nodes are at the same starting height
4309 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 2*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
4310 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 2*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
4311 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], 2*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
4313 // Route a first payment to get the 1 -> 2 channel in awaiting_raa...
4314 let (route, first_payment_hash, _, first_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 100000);
4315 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, first_payment_hash,
4316 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(first_payment_secret), PaymentId(first_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
4317 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().len(), 1);
4318 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4320 // Now attempt to route a second payment, which should be placed in the holding cell
4321 let sending_node = if forwarded_htlc { &nodes[0] } else { &nodes[1] };
4322 let (route, second_payment_hash, _, second_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(sending_node, nodes[2], 100000);
4323 sending_node.node.send_payment_with_route(&route, second_payment_hash,
4324 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(second_payment_secret), PaymentId(second_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
4326 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4327 let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().remove(0));
4328 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
4329 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
4330 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
4332 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
4334 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS);
4335 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
4336 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
4337 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
4340 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
4341 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4342 let fail_commit = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4343 assert_eq!(fail_commit.len(), 1);
4344 match fail_commit[0] {
4345 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fail_htlcs, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
4346 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[0]);
4347 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, true, true);
4349 _ => unreachable!(),
4351 expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], second_payment_hash, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
4353 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], second_payment_hash, false);
4358 fn test_holding_cell_htlc_add_timeouts() {
4359 do_test_holding_cell_htlc_add_timeouts(false);
4360 do_test_holding_cell_htlc_add_timeouts(true);
4363 macro_rules! check_spendable_outputs {
4364 ($node: expr, $keysinterface: expr) => {
4366 let mut events = $node.chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
4367 let mut txn = Vec::new();
4368 let mut all_outputs = Vec::new();
4369 let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
4370 for event in events.drain(..) {
4372 Event::SpendableOutputs { mut outputs, channel_id: _ } => {
4373 for outp in outputs.drain(..) {
4374 txn.push($keysinterface.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outp], Vec::new(), Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, None, &secp_ctx).unwrap());
4375 all_outputs.push(outp);
4378 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4381 if all_outputs.len() > 1 {
4382 if let Ok(tx) = $keysinterface.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&all_outputs.iter().map(|a| a).collect::<Vec<_>>(), Vec::new(), Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, None, &secp_ctx) {
4392 fn test_claim_sizeable_push_msat() {
4393 // Incidentally test SpendableOutput event generation due to detection of to_local output on commitment tx
4394 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4395 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4396 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4397 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4399 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 98_000_000);
4400 nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan.2, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
4401 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4402 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4403 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4404 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4405 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
4406 check_spends!(node_txn[0], chan.3);
4407 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // We can't force trimming of to_remote output as channel_reserve_satoshis block us to do so at channel opening
4409 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
4410 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 - 1);
4412 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4413 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
4414 assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4415 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0]);
4416 assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input[0].sequence.0, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
4420 fn test_claim_on_remote_sizeable_push_msat() {
4421 // Same test as previous, just test on remote commitment tx, as per_commitment_point registration changes following you're funder/fundee and
4422 // to_remote output is encumbered by a P2WPKH
4423 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4424 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4425 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4426 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4428 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 98_000_000);
4429 nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan.2, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
4430 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
4431 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4432 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4434 let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
4435 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
4436 check_spends!(node_txn[0], chan.3);
4437 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // We can't force trimming of to_remote output as channel_reserve_satoshis block us to do so at channel opening
4439 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
4440 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4441 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4442 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4443 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4445 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4446 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
4447 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0]);
4451 fn test_claim_on_remote_revoked_sizeable_push_msat() {
4452 // Same test as previous, just test on remote revoked commitment tx, as per_commitment_point registration changes following you're funder/fundee and
4453 // to_remote output is encumbered by a P2WPKH
4455 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4456 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4457 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4458 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4460 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 59000000);
4461 let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
4462 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
4463 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4464 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
4466 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
4467 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
4468 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4469 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4470 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4472 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4473 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
4474 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4476 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4477 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3);
4478 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]); // to_remote output on revoked remote commitment_tx
4479 check_spends!(spend_txn[1], node_txn[0]);
4480 check_spends!(spend_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0], node_txn[0]); // Both outputs
4484 fn test_static_spendable_outputs_preimage_tx() {
4485 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4486 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4487 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4488 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4490 // Create some initial channels
4491 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4493 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000);
4495 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
4496 assert_eq!(commitment_tx[0].input.len(), 1);
4497 assert_eq!(commitment_tx[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
4499 // Settle A's commitment tx on B's chain
4500 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
4501 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 3_000_000);
4502 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4503 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx[0]);
4504 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4505 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4507 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
4508 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4511 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
4512 _ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
4515 // Check B's monitor was able to send back output descriptor event for preimage tx on A's commitment tx
4516 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone(); // ChannelMonitor: preimage tx
4517 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
4518 check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
4519 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4521 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
4522 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4523 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4525 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4526 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
4527 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0]);
4531 fn test_static_spendable_outputs_timeout_tx() {
4532 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4533 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4534 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4535 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4537 // Create some initial channels
4538 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4540 // Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels ...
4541 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
4543 let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3_000_000);
4545 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
4546 assert_eq!(commitment_tx[0].input.len(), 1);
4547 assert_eq!(commitment_tx[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
4549 // Settle A's commitment tx on B' chain
4550 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx[0]);
4551 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4552 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4554 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
4555 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4557 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
4559 // Check B's monitor was able to send back output descriptor event for timeout tx on A's commitment tx
4560 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
4561 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: timeout tx
4562 check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0].clone());
4563 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4565 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
4566 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4567 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4568 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, false);
4570 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4571 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3); // SpendableOutput: remote_commitment_tx.to_remote, timeout_tx.output
4572 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
4573 check_spends!(spend_txn[1], node_txn[0]);
4574 check_spends!(spend_txn[2], node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]); // All outputs
4578 fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_commitment_tx() {
4579 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4580 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4581 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4582 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4584 // Create some initial channels
4585 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4587 let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
4588 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
4589 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4590 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
4592 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
4594 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
4595 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4596 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4597 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4599 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4600 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
4601 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 2);
4602 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
4604 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
4605 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4607 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4608 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
4609 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0]);
4613 fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_htlc_timeout_tx() {
4614 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4615 chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
4616 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4617 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4618 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4620 // Create some initial channels
4621 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4623 let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
4624 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
4625 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4626 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
4628 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
4630 // A will generate HTLC-Timeout from revoked commitment tx
4631 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
4632 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
4633 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4634 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4635 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
4637 let revoked_htlc_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
4638 assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn.len(), 1);
4639 assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4640 assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4641 check_spends!(revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
4642 assert_ne!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0); // HTLC-Timeout
4644 // B will generate justice tx from A's revoked commitment/HTLC tx
4645 connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone()]));
4646 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4647 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4648 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4650 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4651 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2); // ChannelMonitor: bogus justice tx, justice tx on revoked outputs
4652 // The first transaction generated is bogus - it spends both outputs of revoked_local_txn[0]
4653 // including the one already spent by revoked_htlc_txn[1]. That's OK, we'll spend with valid
4654 // transactions next...
4655 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3);
4656 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[0]);
4658 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 2);
4659 check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[0]);
4660 if node_txn[1].input[1].previous_output.txid == revoked_htlc_txn[0].txid() {
4661 assert_ne!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
4663 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.txid, revoked_htlc_txn[0].txid());
4664 assert_ne!(node_txn[1].input[1].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
4667 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[1]);
4668 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4670 // Check B's ChannelMonitor was able to generate the right spendable output descriptor
4671 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
4672 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
4673 assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4674 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[1]);
4678 fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_htlc_success_tx() {
4679 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
4680 chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
4681 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
4682 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
4683 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4685 // Create some initial channels
4686 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4688 let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
4689 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_1.2);
4690 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4691 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
4693 // The to-be-revoked commitment tx should have one HTLC and one to_remote output
4694 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 2);
4696 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
4698 // B will generate HTLC-Success from revoked commitment tx
4699 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
4700 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4701 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4702 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4703 let revoked_htlc_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4705 assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn.len(), 1);
4706 assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4707 assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4708 check_spends!(revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
4710 // Check that the unspent (of two) outputs on revoked_local_txn[0] is a P2WPKH:
4711 let unspent_local_txn_output = revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize ^ 1;
4712 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output[unspent_local_txn_output].script_pubkey.len(), 2 + 20); // P2WPKH
4714 // A will generate justice tx from B's revoked commitment/HTLC tx
4715 connect_block(&nodes[0], &create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone()]));
4716 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
4717 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
4718 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4720 let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4721 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2); // ChannelMonitor: justice tx on revoked commitment, justice tx on revoked HTLC-success
4723 // The first transaction generated is bogus - it spends both outputs of revoked_local_txn[0]
4724 // including the one already spent by revoked_htlc_txn[0]. That's OK, we'll spend with valid
4725 // transactions next...
4726 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 2);
4727 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[0]);
4728 if node_txn[0].input[1].previous_output.txid == revoked_htlc_txn[0].txid() {
4729 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
4731 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, revoked_htlc_txn[0].txid());
4732 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[1].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
4735 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
4736 check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_htlc_txn[0]);
4738 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &node_txn[1]);
4739 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4741 // Note that nodes[0]'s tx_broadcaster is still locked, so if we get here the channelmonitor
4742 // didn't try to generate any new transactions.
4744 // Check A's ChannelMonitor was able to generate the right spendable output descriptor
4745 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[0], node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
4746 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3);
4747 assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4748 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]); // spending to_remote output from revoked local tx
4749 assert_ne!(spend_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
4750 check_spends!(spend_txn[1], node_txn[1]); // spending justice tx output on the htlc success tx
4751 check_spends!(spend_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0], node_txn[1]); // Both outputs
4755 fn test_onchain_to_onchain_claim() {
4756 // Test that in case of channel closure, we detect the state of output and claim HTLC
4757 // on downstream peer's remote commitment tx.
4758 // First, have C claim an HTLC against its own latest commitment transaction.
4759 // Then, broadcast these to B, which should update the monitor downstream on the A<->B
4761 // Finally, check that B will claim the HTLC output if A's latest commitment transaction
4764 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
4765 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
4766 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
4767 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4769 // Create some initial channels
4770 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4771 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
4773 // Ensure all nodes are at the same height
4774 let node_max_height = nodes.iter().map(|node| node.blocks.lock().unwrap().len()).max().unwrap() as u32;
4775 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_max_height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
4776 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_max_height - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
4777 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], node_max_height - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
4779 // Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels ...
4780 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
4781 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
4783 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3_000_000);
4784 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
4785 check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_2.3);
4786 nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
4787 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], payment_hash, 3_000_000);
4788 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
4789 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
4790 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4791 assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
4792 assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
4793 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4795 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &commitment_tx[0]);
4796 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
4797 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
4798 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4800 let c_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone(); // ChannelMonitor: 1 (HTLC-Success tx)
4801 assert_eq!(c_txn.len(), 1);
4802 check_spends!(c_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
4803 assert_eq!(c_txn[0].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4804 assert!(c_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
4805 assert_eq!(c_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0); // Success tx
4807 // So we broadcast C's commitment tx and HTLC-Success on B's chain, we should successfully be able to extract preimage and update downstream monitor
4808 connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![commitment_tx[0].clone(), c_txn[0].clone()]));
4809 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4810 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
4811 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
4813 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
4814 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4817 Event::PaymentForwarded { fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx, next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat } => {
4818 assert_eq!(fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
4819 assert_eq!(prev_channel_id, Some(chan_1.2));
4820 assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, true);
4821 assert_eq!(next_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
4822 assert_eq!(outbound_amount_forwarded_msat, Some(3000000));
4824 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4826 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4827 let mut msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4828 assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 3);
4829 let nodes_2_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut msg_events);
4830 let nodes_0_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut msg_events);
4832 match nodes_2_event {
4833 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. }, node_id: _ } => {},
4834 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4837 match nodes_0_event {
4838 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
4839 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4840 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
4841 assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
4842 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4843 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
4845 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4848 // Ensure that the last remaining message event is the BroadcastChannelUpdate msg for chan_2
4849 match msg_events[0] {
4850 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
4851 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4854 // Broadcast A's commitment tx on B's chain to see if we are able to claim inbound HTLC with our HTLC-Success tx
4855 let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
4856 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx[0]);
4857 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4858 let b_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4859 // ChannelMonitor: HTLC-Success tx
4860 assert_eq!(b_txn.len(), 1);
4861 check_spends!(b_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
4862 assert_eq!(b_txn[0].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4863 assert!(b_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
4864 assert_eq!(b_txn[0].lock_time.0, nodes[1].best_block_info().1); // Success tx
4866 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4867 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4871 fn test_duplicate_payment_hash_one_failure_one_success() {
4872 // Topology : A --> B --> C --> D
4873 // We route 2 payments with same hash between B and C, one will be timeout, the other successfully claim
4874 // Note that because C will refuse to generate two payment secrets for the same payment hash,
4875 // we forward one of the payments onwards to D.
4876 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
4877 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
4878 // When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
4879 // It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
4880 let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
4881 config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196;
4882 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs,
4883 &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
4884 let mut nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
4886 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
4887 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
4888 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
4890 let node_max_height = nodes.iter().map(|node| node.blocks.lock().unwrap().len()).max().unwrap() as u32;
4891 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_max_height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
4892 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_max_height - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
4893 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], node_max_height - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
4894 connect_blocks(&nodes[3], node_max_height - nodes[3].best_block_info().1);
4896 let (our_payment_preimage, duplicate_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 900_000);
4898 let payment_secret = nodes[3].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(duplicate_payment_hash, None, 7200, None).unwrap();
4899 // We reduce the final CLTV here by a somewhat arbitrary constant to keep it under the one-byte
4900 // script push size limit so that the below script length checks match
4901 // ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT.
4902 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 40)
4903 .with_bolt11_features(nodes[3].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
4904 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[3], payment_params, 800_000);
4905 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[0], route, &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], 800_000, duplicate_payment_hash, payment_secret);
4907 let commitment_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
4908 assert_eq!(commitment_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4909 check_spends!(commitment_txn[0], chan_2.3);
4911 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_txn[0]);
4912 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
4913 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4914 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4915 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 40 + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
4917 let htlc_timeout_tx;
4918 { // Extract one of the two HTLC-Timeout transaction
4919 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
4920 // ChannelMonitor: timeout tx * 2-or-3
4921 assert!(node_txn.len() == 2 || node_txn.len() == 3);
4923 check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_txn[0]);
4924 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4925 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
4927 if node_txn.len() > 2 {
4928 check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_txn[0]);
4929 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
4930 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].output.len(), 1);
4931 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
4933 check_spends!(node_txn[2], commitment_txn[0]);
4934 assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input.len(), 1);
4935 assert_eq!(node_txn[2].output.len(), 1);
4936 assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output);
4938 check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_txn[0]);
4939 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
4940 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].output.len(), 1);
4941 assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
4944 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4945 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4946 // Assign htlc_timeout_tx to the forwarded HTLC (with value ~800 sats). The received HTLC
4947 // (with value 900 sats) will be claimed in the below `claim_funds` call.
4948 if node_txn.len() > 2 {
4949 assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4950 htlc_timeout_tx = if node_txn[2].output[0].value < 900 { node_txn[2].clone() } else { node_txn[0].clone() };
4952 htlc_timeout_tx = if node_txn[0].output[0].value < 900 { node_txn[1].clone() } else { node_txn[0].clone() };
4956 nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
4957 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], duplicate_payment_hash, 900_000);
4959 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &commitment_txn[0]);
4960 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 2);
4961 check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
4962 let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
4964 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
4965 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
4968 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
4969 _ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
4971 let htlc_success_txn: Vec<_> = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
4972 assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn.len(), 2); // ChannelMonitor: HTLC-Success txn (*2 due to 2-HTLC outputs)
4973 check_spends!(htlc_success_txn[0], commitment_txn[0]);
4974 check_spends!(htlc_success_txn[1], commitment_txn[0]);
4975 assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
4976 assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4977 assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
4978 assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
4979 assert_ne!(htlc_success_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, htlc_success_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
4980 assert_ne!(htlc_success_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, htlc_timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output);
4982 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &htlc_timeout_tx);
4983 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
4984 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
4985 let htlc_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
4986 assert!(htlc_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
4987 assert_eq!(htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
4988 let first_htlc_id = htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0].htlc_id;
4989 assert!(htlc_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
4990 assert!(htlc_updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
4991 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
4993 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
4994 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
4996 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], &htlc_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
4998 expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], duplicate_payment_hash, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, true);
5000 // Solve 2nd HTLC by broadcasting on B's chain HTLC-Success Tx from C
5001 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &htlc_success_txn[1]);
5002 expect_payment_forwarded!(nodes[1], nodes[0], nodes[2], Some(196), true, true);
5003 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5004 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
5005 assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
5006 assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
5007 assert_ne!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0].htlc_id, first_htlc_id);
5008 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
5009 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5011 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
5012 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], &updates.commitment_signed, false);
5013 expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], our_payment_preimage, None, true, true);
5017 fn test_dynamic_spendable_outputs_local_htlc_success_tx() {
5018 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5019 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5020 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5021 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5023 // Create some initial channels
5024 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
5026 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 9_000_000);
5027 let local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_1.2);
5028 assert_eq!(local_txn.len(), 1);
5029 assert_eq!(local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
5030 check_spends!(local_txn[0], chan_1.3);
5032 // Give B knowledge of preimage to be able to generate a local HTLC-Success Tx
5033 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
5034 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 9_000_000);
5035 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5037 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &local_txn[0]);
5038 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5039 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
5040 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5042 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
5043 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5046 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
5047 _ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
5050 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
5051 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
5052 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
5053 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
5054 check_spends!(node_txn[0], local_txn[0]);
5058 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_tx);
5059 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 - 1);
5061 // Verify that B is able to spend its own HTLC-Success tx thanks to spendable output event given back by its ChannelMonitor
5062 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
5063 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
5064 assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
5065 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_tx);
5066 assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input[0].sequence.0, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
5069 fn do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(deliver_last_raa: bool, announce_latest: bool) {
5070 // Test that we fail backwards the full set of HTLCs we need to when remote broadcasts an
5071 // unrevoked commitment transaction.
5072 // This includes HTLCs which were below the dust threshold as well as HTLCs which were awaiting
5073 // a remote RAA before they could be failed backwards (and combinations thereof).
5074 // We also test duplicate-hash HTLCs by adding two nodes on each side of the target nodes which
5075 // use the same payment hashes.
5076 // Thus, we use a six-node network:
5081 // And test where C fails back to A/B when D announces its latest commitment transaction
5082 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(6);
5083 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(6, &chanmon_cfgs);
5084 // When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
5085 // It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
5086 let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
5087 config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196;
5088 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(6, &node_cfgs,
5089 &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
5090 let nodes = create_network(6, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5092 let _chan_0_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2);
5093 let _chan_1_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
5094 let chan_2_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
5095 let chan_3_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 4);
5096 let chan_3_5 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 5);
5098 // Rebalance and check output sanity...
5099 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 500000);
5100 send_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]], 500000);
5101 assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2)[0].output.len(), 2);
5103 let ds_dust_limit = nodes[3].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id())
5104 .unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan_2_3.2).unwrap().context.holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
5106 let (_, payment_hash_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
5108 let (_, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
5109 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], ds_dust_limit*1000);
5111 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_1, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_1, None, 7200, None).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
5113 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_2, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_2, None, 7200, None).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
5115 let (_, payment_hash_3, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000);
5117 let (_, payment_hash_4, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000);
5118 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], 1000000);
5120 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_3, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_3, None, 7200, None).unwrap());
5122 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_4, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_4, None, 7200, None).unwrap());
5125 let (_, payment_hash_5, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000);
5127 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], ds_dust_limit*1000);
5128 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_5, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_5, None, 7200, None).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
5131 let (_, payment_hash_6, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
5133 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], 1000000);
5134 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_6, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_6, None, 7200, None).unwrap());
5136 // Double-check that six of the new HTLC were added
5137 // We now have six HTLCs pending over the dust limit and six HTLCs under the dust limit (ie,
5138 // with to_local and to_remote outputs, 8 outputs and 6 HTLCs not included).
5139 assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2).len(), 1);
5140 assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2)[0].output.len(), 8);
5142 // Now fail back three of the over-dust-limit and three of the under-dust-limit payments in one go.
5143 // Fail 0th below-dust, 4th above-dust, 8th above-dust, 10th below-dust HTLCs
5144 nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_1);
5145 nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_3);
5146 nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_5);
5147 nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_6);
5148 check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 0);
5150 let failed_destinations = vec![
5151 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_1 },
5152 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_3 },
5153 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_5 },
5154 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_6 },
5156 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[4], failed_destinations);
5157 check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 1);
5159 let four_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[4], nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id());
5160 nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), &four_removes.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
5161 nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), &four_removes.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
5162 nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), &four_removes.update_fail_htlcs[2]);
5163 nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), &four_removes.update_fail_htlcs[3]);
5164 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[3], nodes[4], four_removes.commitment_signed, false);
5166 // Fail 3rd below-dust and 7th above-dust HTLCs
5167 nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_2);
5168 nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_4);
5169 check_added_monitors!(nodes[5], 0);
5171 let failed_destinations_2 = vec![
5172 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_2 },
5173 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_4 },
5175 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[5], failed_destinations_2);
5176 check_added_monitors!(nodes[5], 1);
5178 let two_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[5], nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id());
5179 nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id(), &two_removes.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
5180 nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id(), &two_removes.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
5181 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[3], nodes[5], two_removes.commitment_signed, false);
5183 let ds_prev_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2);
5185 // After 4 and 2 removes respectively above in nodes[4] and nodes[5], nodes[3] should receive 6 PaymentForwardedFailed events
5186 let failed_destinations_3 = vec![
5187 HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
5188 HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
5189 HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
5190 HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
5191 HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_5.2 },
5192 HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_5.2 },
5194 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[3], failed_destinations_3);
5195 check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
5196 let six_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[3], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
5197 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
5198 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
5199 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[2]);
5200 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[3]);
5201 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[4]);
5202 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[5]);
5203 if deliver_last_raa {
5204 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[3], six_removes.commitment_signed, false);
5206 let _cs_last_raa = commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[3], six_removes.commitment_signed, false, true, false, true);
5209 // D's latest commitment transaction now contains 1st + 2nd + 9th HTLCs (implicitly, they're
5210 // below the dust limit) and the 5th + 6th + 11th HTLCs. It has failed back the 0th, 3rd, 4th,
5211 // 7th, 8th, and 10th, but as we haven't yet delivered the final RAA to C, the fails haven't
5212 // propagated back to A/B yet (and D has two unrevoked commitment transactions).
5214 // We now broadcast the latest commitment transaction, which *should* result in failures for
5215 // the 0th, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th HTLCs, ie all the below-dust HTLCs and
5216 // the non-broadcast above-dust HTLCs.
5218 // Alternatively, we may broadcast the previous commitment transaction, which should only
5219 // result in failures for the below-dust HTLCs, ie the 0th, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 9th, and 10th HTLCs.
5220 let ds_last_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2);
5222 if announce_latest {
5223 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &ds_last_commitment_tx[0]);
5225 mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &ds_prev_commitment_tx[0]);
5227 let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5228 let close_event = if deliver_last_raa {
5229 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2 + 6);
5230 events.last().clone().unwrap()
5232 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
5233 events.last().clone().unwrap()
5236 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
5237 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5240 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
5241 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
5242 if deliver_last_raa {
5243 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[2], events[0..1], true);
5245 let expected_destinations: Vec<HTLCDestination> = repeat(HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }).take(3).collect();
5246 expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!(nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), expected_destinations);
5248 let expected_destinations: Vec<HTLCDestination> = if announce_latest {
5249 repeat(HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }).take(9).collect()
5251 repeat(HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }).take(6).collect()
5254 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], expected_destinations);
5256 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 3);
5258 let cs_msgs = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5259 assert_eq!(cs_msgs.len(), 2);
5260 let mut a_done = false;
5261 for msg in cs_msgs {
5263 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, ref updates } => {
5264 // Both under-dust HTLCs and the one above-dust HTLC that we had already failed
5265 // should be failed-backwards here.
5266 let target = if *node_id == nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id() {
5267 // If announce_latest, expect 0th, 1st, 4th, 8th, 10th HTLCs, else only 0th, 1st, 10th below-dust HTLCs
5268 for htlc in &updates.update_fail_htlcs {
5269 assert!(htlc.htlc_id == 1 || htlc.htlc_id == 2 || htlc.htlc_id == 6 || if announce_latest { htlc.htlc_id == 3 || htlc.htlc_id == 5 } else { false });
5271 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), if announce_latest { 5 } else { 3 });
5276 // If announce_latest, expect 2nd, 3rd, 7th, 9th HTLCs, else only 2nd, 3rd, 9th below-dust HTLCs
5277 for htlc in &updates.update_fail_htlcs {
5278 assert!(htlc.htlc_id == 1 || htlc.htlc_id == 2 || htlc.htlc_id == 5 || if announce_latest { htlc.htlc_id == 4 } else { false });
5280 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5281 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), if announce_latest { 4 } else { 3 });
5284 target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
5285 target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
5286 target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[2]);
5287 if announce_latest {
5288 target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[3]);
5289 if *node_id == nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id() {
5290 target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[4]);
5293 commitment_signed_dance!(target, nodes[2], updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
5295 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5299 let as_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5300 assert_eq!(as_events.len(), if announce_latest { 10 } else { 6 });
5301 let mut as_failds = HashSet::new();
5302 let mut as_updates = 0;
5303 for event in as_events.iter() {
5304 if let &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref payment_failed_permanently, ref failure, .. } = event {
5305 assert!(as_failds.insert(*payment_hash));
5306 if *payment_hash != payment_hash_2 {
5307 assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, deliver_last_raa);
5309 assert!(!payment_failed_permanently);
5311 if let PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) } = failure {
5314 } else if let &Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = event {
5315 } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
5317 assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_1));
5318 assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_2));
5319 if announce_latest {
5320 assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_3));
5321 assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_5));
5323 assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_6));
5325 let bs_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5326 assert_eq!(bs_events.len(), if announce_latest { 8 } else { 6 });
5327 let mut bs_failds = HashSet::new();
5328 let mut bs_updates = 0;
5329 for event in bs_events.iter() {
5330 if let &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref payment_failed_permanently, ref failure, .. } = event {
5331 assert!(bs_failds.insert(*payment_hash));
5332 if *payment_hash != payment_hash_1 && *payment_hash != payment_hash_5 {
5333 assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, deliver_last_raa);
5335 assert!(!payment_failed_permanently);
5337 if let PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) } = failure {
5340 } else if let &Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = event {
5341 } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
5343 assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_1));
5344 assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_2));
5345 if announce_latest {
5346 assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_4));
5348 assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_5));
5350 // For each HTLC which was not failed-back by normal process (ie deliver_last_raa), we should
5351 // get a NetworkUpdate. A should have gotten 4 HTLCs which were failed-back due to
5352 // unknown-preimage-etc, B should have gotten 2. Thus, in the
5353 // announce_latest && deliver_last_raa case, we should have 5-4=1 and 4-2=2 NetworkUpdates.
5354 assert_eq!(as_updates, if deliver_last_raa { 1 } else if !announce_latest { 3 } else { 5 });
5355 assert_eq!(bs_updates, if deliver_last_raa { 2 } else if !announce_latest { 3 } else { 4 });
5359 fn test_fail_backwards_latest_remote_announce_a() {
5360 do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(false, true);
5364 fn test_fail_backwards_latest_remote_announce_b() {
5365 do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(true, true);
5369 fn test_fail_backwards_previous_remote_announce() {
5370 do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(false, false);
5371 // Note that true, true doesn't make sense as it implies we announce a revoked state, which is
5372 // tested for in test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive()
5376 fn test_dynamic_spendable_outputs_local_htlc_timeout_tx() {
5377 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5378 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5379 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5380 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5382 // Create some initial channels
5383 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
5385 let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9000000);
5386 let local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
5387 assert_eq!(local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
5388 check_spends!(local_txn[0], chan_1.3);
5390 // Timeout HTLC on A's chain and so it can generate a HTLC-Timeout tx
5391 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &local_txn[0]);
5392 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
5393 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5394 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
5395 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
5397 let htlc_timeout = {
5398 let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
5399 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
5400 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
5401 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
5402 check_spends!(node_txn[0], local_txn[0]);
5406 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &htlc_timeout);
5407 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 - 1);
5408 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false);
5410 // Verify that A is able to spend its own HTLC-Timeout tx thanks to spendable output event given back by its ChannelMonitor
5411 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[0], node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
5412 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3);
5413 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], local_txn[0]);
5414 assert_eq!(spend_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
5415 check_spends!(spend_txn[1], htlc_timeout);
5416 assert_eq!(spend_txn[1].input[0].sequence.0, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
5417 assert_eq!(spend_txn[2].input.len(), 2);
5418 check_spends!(spend_txn[2], local_txn[0], htlc_timeout);
5419 assert!(spend_txn[2].input[0].sequence.0 == BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 ||
5420 spend_txn[2].input[1].sequence.0 == BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
5424 fn test_key_derivation_params() {
5425 // This test is a copy of test_dynamic_spendable_outputs_local_htlc_timeout_tx, with a key
5426 // manager rotation to test that `channel_keys_id` returned in
5427 // [`SpendableOutputDescriptor::DelayedPaymentOutput`] let us re-derive the channel key set to
5428 // then derive a `delayed_payment_key`.
5430 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
5432 // We manually create the node configuration to backup the seed.
5433 let seed = [42; 32];
5434 let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&seed, Network::Testnet);
5435 let chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &chanmon_cfgs[0].persister, &keys_manager);
5436 let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(Network::Testnet, &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger));
5437 let scorer = Mutex::new(test_utils::TestScorer::new());
5438 let router = test_utils::TestRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), &scorer);
5439 let node = NodeCfg { chain_source: &chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source, logger: &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, tx_broadcaster: &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, fee_estimator: &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, router, chain_monitor, keys_manager: &keys_manager, network_graph, node_seed: seed, override_init_features: alloc::rc::Rc::new(core::cell::RefCell::new(None)) };
5440 let mut node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
5441 node_cfgs.remove(0);
5442 node_cfgs.insert(0, node);
5444 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
5445 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5447 // Create some initial channels
5448 // Create a dummy channel to advance index by one and thus test re-derivation correctness
5450 let chan_0 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2);
5451 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
5452 assert_ne!(chan_0.3.output[0].script_pubkey, chan_1.3.output[0].script_pubkey);
5454 // Ensure all nodes are at the same height
5455 let node_max_height = nodes.iter().map(|node| node.blocks.lock().unwrap().len()).max().unwrap() as u32;
5456 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_max_height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
5457 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_max_height - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
5458 connect_blocks(&nodes[2], node_max_height - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
5460 let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9000000);
5461 let local_txn_0 = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_0.2);
5462 let local_txn_1 = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
5463 assert_eq!(local_txn_1[0].input.len(), 1);
5464 check_spends!(local_txn_1[0], chan_1.3);
5466 // We check funding pubkey are unique
5467 let (from_0_funding_key_0, from_0_funding_key_1) = (PublicKey::from_slice(&local_txn_0[0].input[0].witness.to_vec()[3][2..35]), PublicKey::from_slice(&local_txn_0[0].input[0].witness.to_vec()[3][36..69]));
5468 let (from_1_funding_key_0, from_1_funding_key_1) = (PublicKey::from_slice(&local_txn_1[0].input[0].witness.to_vec()[3][2..35]), PublicKey::from_slice(&local_txn_1[0].input[0].witness.to_vec()[3][36..69]));
5469 if from_0_funding_key_0 == from_1_funding_key_0
5470 || from_0_funding_key_0 == from_1_funding_key_1
5471 || from_0_funding_key_1 == from_1_funding_key_0
5472 || from_0_funding_key_1 == from_1_funding_key_1 {
5473 panic!("Funding pubkeys aren't unique");
5476 // Timeout HTLC on A's chain and so it can generate a HTLC-Timeout tx
5477 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &local_txn_1[0]);
5478 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
5479 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
5480 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5481 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
5483 let htlc_timeout = {
5484 let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
5485 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
5486 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
5487 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
5488 check_spends!(node_txn[0], local_txn_1[0]);
5492 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &htlc_timeout);
5493 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 - 1);
5494 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false);
5496 // Verify that A is able to spend its own HTLC-Timeout tx thanks to spendable output event given back by its ChannelMonitor
5497 let new_keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&seed, Network::Testnet);
5498 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[0], new_keys_manager);
5499 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3);
5500 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], local_txn_1[0]);
5501 assert_eq!(spend_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
5502 check_spends!(spend_txn[1], htlc_timeout);
5503 assert_eq!(spend_txn[1].input[0].sequence.0, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
5504 assert_eq!(spend_txn[2].input.len(), 2);
5505 check_spends!(spend_txn[2], local_txn_1[0], htlc_timeout);
5506 assert!(spend_txn[2].input[0].sequence.0 == BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 ||
5507 spend_txn[2].input[1].sequence.0 == BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
5511 fn test_static_output_closing_tx() {
5512 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5513 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5514 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5515 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5517 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
5519 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
5520 let closing_tx = close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan.2, chan.3, true).2;
5522 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &closing_tx);
5523 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
5524 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
5526 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[0], node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
5527 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
5528 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], closing_tx);
5530 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &closing_tx);
5531 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
5532 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
5534 let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
5535 assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
5536 check_spends!(spend_txn[0], closing_tx);
5539 fn do_htlc_claim_local_commitment_only(use_dust: bool) {
5540 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5541 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5542 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5543 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5544 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
5546 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3_000_000 });
5548 // Claim the payment, but don't deliver A's commitment_signed, resulting in the HTLC only being
5549 // present in B's local commitment transaction, but none of A's commitment transactions.
5550 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
5551 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5552 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3_000_000 });
5554 let bs_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5555 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
5556 expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], payment_preimage, None, false, false);
5558 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.commitment_signed);
5559 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5560 let as_updates = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5561 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.0);
5562 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5564 let starting_block = nodes[1].best_block_info();
5565 let mut block = create_dummy_block(starting_block.0, 42, Vec::new());
5566 for _ in starting_block.1 + 1..TEST_FINAL_CLTV - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER + starting_block.1 + 2 {
5567 connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
5568 block.header.prev_blockhash = block.block_hash();
5570 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan, None, if use_dust { HTLCType::NONE } else { HTLCType::SUCCESS });
5571 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
5572 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5573 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
5576 fn do_htlc_claim_current_remote_commitment_only(use_dust: bool) {
5577 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5578 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5579 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5580 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5581 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
5583 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 });
5584 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
5585 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
5586 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5588 let _as_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5590 // As far as A is concerned, the HTLC is now present only in the latest remote commitment
5591 // transaction, however it is not in A's latest local commitment, so we can just broadcast that
5592 // to "time out" the HTLC.
5594 let starting_block = nodes[1].best_block_info();
5595 let mut block = create_dummy_block(starting_block.0, 42, Vec::new());
5597 for _ in starting_block.1 + 1..TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + starting_block.1 + 2 {
5598 connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
5599 block.header.prev_blockhash = block.block_hash();
5601 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan, None, HTLCType::NONE);
5602 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
5603 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5604 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
5607 fn do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(use_dust: bool, check_revoke_no_close: bool) {
5608 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
5609 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
5610 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
5611 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5612 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
5614 // Fail the payment, but don't deliver A's final RAA, resulting in the HTLC only being present
5615 // in B's previous (unrevoked) commitment transaction, but none of A's commitment transactions.
5616 // Also optionally test that we *don't* fail the channel in case the commitment transaction was
5617 // actually revoked.
5618 let htlc_value = if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 };
5619 let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], htlc_value);
5620 nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash);
5621 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
5622 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5624 let bs_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5625 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
5626 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.commitment_signed);
5627 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5628 let as_updates = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5629 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.0);
5630 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5631 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.1);
5632 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5633 let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5635 if check_revoke_no_close {
5636 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
5637 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5640 let starting_block = nodes[1].best_block_info();
5641 let mut block = create_dummy_block(starting_block.0, 42, Vec::new());
5642 for _ in starting_block.1 + 1..TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 2 {
5643 connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
5644 block.header.prev_blockhash = block.block_hash();
5646 if !check_revoke_no_close {
5647 test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan, None, HTLCType::NONE);
5648 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
5649 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5650 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
5652 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true);
5656 // Test that we close channels on-chain when broadcastable HTLCs reach their timeout window.
5657 // There are only a few cases to test here:
5658 // * its not really normative behavior, but we test that below-dust HTLCs "included" in
5659 // broadcastable commitment transactions result in channel closure,
5660 // * its included in an unrevoked-but-previous remote commitment transaction,
5661 // * its included in the latest remote or local commitment transactions.
5662 // We test each of the three possible commitment transactions individually and use both dust and
5664 // Note that we don't bother testing both outbound and inbound HTLC failures for each case, and we
5665 // assume they are handled the same across all six cases, as both outbound and inbound failures are
5666 // tested for at least one of the cases in other tests.
5668 fn htlc_claim_single_commitment_only_a() {
5669 do_htlc_claim_local_commitment_only(true);
5670 do_htlc_claim_local_commitment_only(false);
5672 do_htlc_claim_current_remote_commitment_only(true);
5673 do_htlc_claim_current_remote_commitment_only(false);
5677 fn htlc_claim_single_commitment_only_b() {
5678 do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(true, false);
5679 do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(false, false);
5680 do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(true, true);
5681 do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(false, true);
5686 fn bolt2_open_channel_sending_node_checks_part1() { //This test needs to be on its own as we are catching a panic
5687 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5688 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5689 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5690 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5691 // Force duplicate randomness for every get-random call
5692 for node in nodes.iter() {
5693 *node.keys_manager.override_random_bytes.lock().unwrap() = Some([0; 32]);
5696 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must ensure temporary_channel_id is unique from any other channel ID with the same peer.
5697 let channel_value_satoshis=10000;
5698 let push_msat=10001;
5699 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).unwrap();
5700 let node0_to_1_send_open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5701 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node0_to_1_send_open_channel);
5702 get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5704 // Create a second channel with the same random values. This used to panic due to a colliding
5705 // channel_id, but now panics due to a colliding outbound SCID alias.
5706 assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_err());
5710 fn bolt2_open_channel_sending_node_checks_part2() {
5711 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5712 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5713 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5714 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5716 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set funding_satoshis to less than 2^24 satoshis
5717 let channel_value_satoshis=2^24;
5718 let push_msat=10001;
5719 assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_err());
5721 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set push_msat to equal or less than 1000 * funding_satoshis
5722 let channel_value_satoshis=10000;
5723 // Test when push_msat is equal to 1000 * funding_satoshis.
5724 let push_msat=1000*channel_value_satoshis+1;
5725 assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_err());
5727 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set set channel_reserve_satoshis greater than or equal to dust_limit_satoshis
5728 let channel_value_satoshis=10000;
5729 let push_msat=10001;
5730 assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_ok()); //Create a valid channel
5731 let node0_to_1_send_open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5732 assert!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.channel_reserve_satoshis>=node0_to_1_send_open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis);
5734 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set undefined bits in channel_flags to 0
5735 // Only the least-significant bit of channel_flags is currently defined resulting in channel_flags only having one of two possible states 0 or 1
5736 assert!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.channel_flags<=1);
5738 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node should set to_self_delay sufficient to ensure the sender can irreversibly spend a commitment transaction output, in case of misbehaviour by the receiver.
5739 assert!(BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT>0);
5740 assert!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.to_self_delay==BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT);
5742 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must ensure the chain_hash value identifies the chain it wishes to open the channel within.
5743 let chain_hash=genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash();
5744 assert_eq!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.chain_hash,chain_hash);
5746 // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set funding_pubkey, revocation_basepoint, htlc_basepoint, payment_basepoint, and delayed_payment_basepoint to valid DER-encoded, compressed, secp256k1 pubkeys.
5747 assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.funding_pubkey.serialize()).is_ok());
5748 assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.revocation_basepoint.serialize()).is_ok());
5749 assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.htlc_basepoint.serialize()).is_ok());
5750 assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.payment_point.serialize()).is_ok());
5751 assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.delayed_payment_basepoint.serialize()).is_ok());
5755 fn bolt2_open_channel_sane_dust_limit() {
5756 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5757 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5758 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5759 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5761 let channel_value_satoshis=1000000;
5762 let push_msat=10001;
5763 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).unwrap();
5764 let mut node0_to_1_send_open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
5765 node0_to_1_send_open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis = 547;
5766 node0_to_1_send_open_channel.channel_reserve_satoshis = 100001;
5768 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node0_to_1_send_open_channel);
5769 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5770 let err_msg = match events[0] {
5771 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => {
5774 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5776 assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "dust_limit_satoshis (547) is greater than the implementation limit (546)");
5779 // Test that if we fail to send an HTLC that is being freed from the holding cell, and the HTLC
5780 // originated from our node, its failure is surfaced to the user. We trigger this failure to
5781 // free the HTLC by increasing our fee while the HTLC is in the holding cell such that the HTLC
5782 // is no longer affordable once it's freed.
5784 fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
5785 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5786 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5787 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5788 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5789 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
5791 // First nodes[0] generates an update_fee, setting the channel's
5792 // pending_update_fee.
5794 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
5795 *feerate_lock += 20;
5797 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
5798 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5800 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5801 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
5802 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
5803 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
5804 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
5806 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5809 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
5811 let mut chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5812 let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
5813 let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5814 let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5816 // 2* and +1 HTLCs on the commit tx fee calculation for the fee spike reserve.
5817 let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1, &channel_type_features);
5818 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_can_send);
5820 // Send a payment which passes reserve checks but gets stuck in the holding cell.
5821 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
5822 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
5823 chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5824 assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, max_can_send);
5826 // Flush the pending fee update.
5827 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
5828 let (as_revoke_and_ack, _) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5829 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5830 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
5831 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5833 // Upon receipt of the RAA, there will be an attempt to resend the holding cell
5834 // HTLC, but now that the fee has been raised the payment will now fail, causing
5835 // us to surface its failure to the user.
5836 chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5837 assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0);
5838 nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 1 HTLC updates in channel {}", hex::encode(chan.2)), 1);
5840 // Check that the payment failed to be sent out.
5841 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5842 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
5844 &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref payment_failed_permanently, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: None }, ref short_channel_id, .. } => {
5845 assert_eq!(PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0), *payment_id.as_ref().unwrap());
5846 assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
5847 assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, false);
5848 assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, Some(route.paths[0].hops[0].short_channel_id));
5850 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5853 &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
5854 assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
5856 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5860 // Test that if multiple HTLCs are released from the holding cell and one is
5861 // valid but the other is no longer valid upon release, the valid HTLC can be
5862 // successfully completed while the other one fails as expected.
5864 fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
5865 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
5866 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
5867 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
5868 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5869 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
5871 // First nodes[0] generates an update_fee, setting the channel's
5872 // pending_update_fee.
5874 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
5875 *feerate_lock += 200;
5877 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
5878 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
5880 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5881 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
5882 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
5883 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
5884 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
5886 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5889 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
5891 let mut chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5892 let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
5893 let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5894 let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5896 // 2* and +1 HTLCs on the commit tx fee calculation for the fee spike reserve.
5898 let amt_2 = 5000000 - channel_reserve - 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 2 + 1, &channel_type_features) - amt_1;
5899 let (route_1, payment_hash_1, payment_preimage_1, payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], amt_1);
5900 let (route_2, payment_hash_2, _, payment_secret_2) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], amt_2);
5902 // Send 2 payments which pass reserve checks but get stuck in the holding cell.
5903 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_1, payment_hash_1,
5904 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_1), PaymentId(payment_hash_1.0)).unwrap();
5905 chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5906 assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, amt_1);
5907 let payment_id_2 = PaymentId(nodes[0].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes());
5908 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_2, payment_hash_2,
5909 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_2), payment_id_2).unwrap();
5910 chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5911 assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, amt_1 + amt_2);
5913 // Flush the pending fee update.
5914 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
5915 let (revoke_and_ack, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5916 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5917 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_and_ack);
5918 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
5919 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 2);
5921 // Upon receipt of the RAA, there will be an attempt to resend the holding cell HTLCs,
5922 // but now that the fee has been raised the second payment will now fail, causing us
5923 // to surface its failure to the user. The first payment should succeed.
5924 chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
5925 assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0);
5926 nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 2 HTLC updates in channel {}", hex::encode(chan.2)), 1);
5928 // Check that the second payment failed to be sent out.
5929 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5930 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
5932 &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref payment_failed_permanently, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: None }, ref short_channel_id, .. } => {
5933 assert_eq!(payment_id_2, *payment_id.as_ref().unwrap());
5934 assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
5935 assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, false);
5936 assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, Some(route_2.paths[0].hops[0].short_channel_id));
5938 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5941 &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
5942 assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
5944 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5947 // Complete the first payment and the RAA from the fee update.
5948 let (payment_event, send_raa_event) = {
5949 let mut msgs = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
5950 assert_eq!(msgs.len(), 2);
5951 (SendEvent::from_event(msgs.remove(0)), msgs.remove(0))
5953 let raa = match send_raa_event {
5954 MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { msg, .. } => msg,
5955 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5957 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
5958 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5959 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
5960 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
5961 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5962 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
5964 Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => {},
5965 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5967 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
5968 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
5969 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
5971 Event::PaymentClaimable { .. } => {},
5972 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
5974 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1);
5975 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
5976 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, amt_1);
5978 let update_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
5979 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
5980 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], update_msgs.commitment_signed, false, true);
5981 expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
5984 // Test that if we fail to forward an HTLC that is being freed from the holding cell that the
5985 // HTLC is failed backwards. We trigger this failure to forward the freed HTLC by increasing
5986 // our fee while the HTLC is in the holding cell such that the HTLC is no longer affordable
5989 fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free_multihop() {
5990 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
5991 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
5992 // Avoid having to include routing fees in calculations
5993 let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
5994 config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 0;
5995 config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_proportional_millionths = 0;
5996 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
5997 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
5998 let chan_0_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
5999 let chan_1_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 100000, 95000000);
6001 // First nodes[1] generates an update_fee, setting the channel's
6002 // pending_update_fee.
6004 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
6005 *feerate_lock += 20;
6007 nodes[1].node.timer_tick_occurred();
6008 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6010 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6011 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
6012 let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
6013 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
6014 (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
6016 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6019 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
6021 let mut chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_0_1.2);
6022 let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
6023 let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_0_1.2);
6024 let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_0_1.2);
6026 // Send a payment which passes reserve checks but gets stuck in the holding cell.
6027 let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1, &channel_type_features);
6028 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], max_can_send);
6029 let payment_event = {
6030 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6031 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6032 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6034 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6035 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
6037 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
6039 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
6040 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
6041 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
6042 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
6044 chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[2], chan_1_2.2);
6045 assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, max_can_send);
6047 // Flush the pending fee update.
6048 nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
6049 let (raa, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6050 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
6051 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
6052 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
6053 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
6055 // A final RAA message is generated to finalize the fee update.
6056 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6057 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
6059 let raa_msg = match &events[0] {
6060 &MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref msg, .. } => {
6063 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6066 nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa_msg);
6067 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
6068 assert!(nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
6070 // nodes[1]'s ChannelManager will now signal that we have HTLC forwards to process.
6071 let process_htlc_forwards_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
6072 assert_eq!(process_htlc_forwards_event.len(), 2);
6073 match &process_htlc_forwards_event[0] {
6074 &Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => {},
6075 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6078 // In response, we call ChannelManager's process_pending_htlc_forwards
6079 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
6080 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6082 // This causes the HTLC to be failed backwards.
6083 let fail_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6084 assert_eq!(fail_event.len(), 1);
6085 let (fail_msg, commitment_signed) = match &fail_event[0] {
6086 &MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref updates, .. } => {
6087 assert_eq!(updates.update_add_htlcs.len(), 0);
6088 assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 0);
6089 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 0);
6090 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
6091 (updates.update_fail_htlcs[0].clone(), updates.commitment_signed.clone())
6093 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6096 // Pass the failure messages back to nodes[0].
6097 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_msg);
6098 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
6100 // Complete the HTLC failure+removal process.
6101 let (raa, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6102 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6103 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
6104 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
6105 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
6106 let final_raa_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6107 assert_eq!(final_raa_event.len(), 1);
6108 let raa = match &final_raa_event[0] {
6109 &MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref msg, .. } => msg.clone(),
6110 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6112 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
6113 expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false, chan_1_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
6114 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6117 // BOLT 2 Requirements for the Sender when constructing and sending an update_add_htlc message.
6118 // BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST NOT offer amount_msat it cannot pay for in the remote commitment transaction at the current feerate_per_kw (see "Updating Fees") while maintaining its channel reserve.
6119 //TODO: I don't believe this is explicitly enforced when sending an HTLC but as the Fee aspect of the BOLT specs is in flux leaving this as a TODO.
6122 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_value_below_minimum_msat() {
6123 //BOLT2 Requirement: MUST NOT offer amount_msat below the receiving node's htlc_minimum_msat (same validation check catches both of these)
6124 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6125 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6126 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6127 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6128 let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
6130 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
6131 route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = 100;
6133 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6134 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
6135 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
6136 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
6140 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_zero_value_msat() {
6141 //BOLT2 Requirement: MUST offer amount_msat greater than 0.
6142 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6143 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6144 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6145 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6146 let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
6148 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
6149 route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = 0;
6150 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6151 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)),
6152 true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
6153 assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC"));
6155 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
6156 nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC", 1);
6160 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_zero_value_msat() {
6161 //BOLT2 Requirement: MUST offer amount_msat greater than 0.
6162 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6163 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6164 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6165 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6166 let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
6168 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
6169 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6170 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6171 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6172 let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6173 updates.update_add_htlcs[0].amount_msat = 0;
6175 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6176 nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC".to_string(), 1);
6177 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
6178 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6179 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC".to_string() },
6180 [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
6184 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_cltv_expiry_too_high() {
6185 //BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST set cltv_expiry less than 500000000.
6186 //It is enforced when constructing a route.
6187 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6188 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6189 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6190 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6191 let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 0);
6193 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 0)
6194 .with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
6195 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], payment_params, 100000000);
6196 route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().cltv_expiry_delta = 500000001;
6197 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6198 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
6199 ), true, APIError::InvalidRoute { ref err },
6200 assert_eq!(err, &"Channel CLTV overflowed?"));
6204 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_exceed_max_htlc_num_and_htlc_id_increment() {
6205 //BOLT 2 Requirement: if result would be offering more than the remote's max_accepted_htlcs HTLCs, in the remote commitment transaction: MUST NOT add an HTLC.
6206 //BOLT 2 Requirement: for the first HTLC it offers MUST set id to 0.
6207 //BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST increase the value of id by 1 for each successive offer.
6208 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6209 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6210 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6211 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6212 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 0);
6213 let max_accepted_htlcs = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id())
6214 .unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().context.counterparty_max_accepted_htlcs as u64;
6216 // Fetch a route in advance as we will be unable to once we're unable to send.
6217 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
6218 for i in 0..max_accepted_htlcs {
6219 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
6220 let payment_event = {
6221 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6222 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6223 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6225 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6226 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
6227 if let MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate{ update_add_htlcs: ref htlcs, .. }, } = events[0] {
6228 assert_eq!(htlcs[0].htlc_id, i);
6232 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
6234 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
6235 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
6236 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
6238 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
6239 expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, 100000);
6241 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6242 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
6243 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
6245 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
6249 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_exceed_max_htlc_value_in_flight() {
6250 //BOLT 2 Requirement: if the sum of total offered HTLCs would exceed the remote's max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat: MUST NOT add an HTLC.
6251 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6252 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6253 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6254 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6255 let channel_value = 100000;
6256 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value, 0);
6257 let max_in_flight = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2).counterparty_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat;
6259 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], max_in_flight);
6261 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_in_flight);
6262 // Manually create a route over our max in flight (which our router normally automatically
6264 route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = max_in_flight + 1;
6265 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6266 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
6267 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
6268 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
6270 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], max_in_flight);
6273 // BOLT 2 Requirements for the Receiver when handling an update_add_htlc message.
6275 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_amount_received_more_than_min() {
6276 //BOLT2 Requirement: receiving an amount_msat equal to 0, OR less than its own htlc_minimum_msat -> SHOULD fail the channel.
6277 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6278 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6279 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6280 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6281 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
6282 let htlc_minimum_msat: u64;
6284 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
6285 let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
6286 let channel = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
6287 htlc_minimum_msat = channel.context.get_holder_htlc_minimum_msat();
6290 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], htlc_minimum_msat);
6291 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6292 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6293 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6294 let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6295 updates.update_add_htlcs[0].amount_msat = htlc_minimum_msat-1;
6296 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6297 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6298 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
6299 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote side tried to send less than our minimum HTLC value\. Lower limit: \(\d+\)\. Actual: \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6300 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6301 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
6305 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_sender_can_afford_amount_sent() {
6306 //BOLT2 Requirement: receiving an amount_msat that the sending node cannot afford at the current feerate_per_kw (while maintaining its channel reserve): SHOULD fail the channel
6307 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6308 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6309 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6310 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6311 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
6313 let chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
6314 let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
6315 let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
6316 let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
6317 // The 2* and +1 are for the fee spike reserve.
6318 let commit_tx_fee_outbound = 2 * commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1, &channel_type_features);
6320 let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - commit_tx_fee_outbound;
6321 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_can_send);
6322 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6323 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6324 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6325 let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6327 // Even though channel-initiator senders are required to respect the fee_spike_reserve,
6328 // at this time channel-initiatee receivers are not required to enforce that senders
6329 // respect the fee_spike_reserve.
6330 updates.update_add_htlcs[0].amount_msat = max_can_send + commit_tx_fee_outbound + 1;
6331 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6333 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6334 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
6335 assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value");
6336 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6337 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
6341 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_max_htlc_limit() {
6342 //BOLT 2 Requirement: if a sending node adds more than its max_accepted_htlcs HTLCs to its local commitment transaction: SHOULD fail the channel
6343 //BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST allow multiple HTLCs with the same payment_hash.
6344 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6345 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6346 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6347 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6348 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
6350 let send_amt = 3999999;
6351 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) =
6352 get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000);
6353 route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = send_amt;
6354 let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
6355 let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
6356 let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::signing_only(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
6357 let (onion_payloads, _htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(
6358 &route.paths[0], send_amt, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
6359 let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash).unwrap();
6361 let mut msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
6365 payment_hash: our_payment_hash,
6366 cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
6367 onion_routing_packet: onion_packet.clone(),
6368 skimmed_fee_msat: None,
6372 msg.htlc_id = i as u64;
6373 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
6375 msg.htlc_id = (50) as u64;
6376 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
6378 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6379 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
6380 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to push more than our max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6381 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6382 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
6386 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_max_in_flight_msat() {
6387 //OR adds more than its max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat worth of offered HTLCs to its local commitment transaction: SHOULD fail the channel
6388 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6389 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6390 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6391 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6392 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 1000000);
6394 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
6395 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6396 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6397 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6398 let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6399 updates.update_add_htlcs[0].amount_msat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[0], chan.2).counterparty_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat + 1;
6400 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6402 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6403 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
6404 assert!(regex::Regex::new("Remote HTLC add would put them over our max HTLC value").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6405 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6406 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
6410 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_cltv_expiry() {
6411 //BOLT2 Requirement: if sending node sets cltv_expiry to greater or equal to 500000000: SHOULD fail the channel.
6412 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6413 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6414 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6415 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6417 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
6418 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
6419 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6420 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6421 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6422 let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6423 updates.update_add_htlcs[0].cltv_expiry = 500000000;
6424 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6426 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6427 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
6428 assert_eq!(err_msg.data,"Remote provided CLTV expiry in seconds instead of block height");
6429 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6430 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
6434 fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_repeated_id_ignore() {
6435 //BOLT 2 requirement: if the sender did not previously acknowledge the commitment of that HTLC: MUST ignore a repeated id value after a reconnection.
6436 // We test this by first testing that that repeated HTLCs pass commitment signature checks
6437 // after disconnect and that non-sequential htlc_ids result in a channel failure.
6438 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6439 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6440 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6441 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6443 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6444 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
6445 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6446 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6447 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6448 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6449 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6451 //Disconnect and Reconnect
6452 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6453 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
6454 nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
6455 features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
6457 let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
6458 assert_eq!(reestablish_1.len(), 1);
6459 nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
6460 features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
6462 let reestablish_2 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
6463 assert_eq!(reestablish_2.len(), 1);
6464 nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[0]);
6465 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
6466 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[0]);
6467 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
6470 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6471 assert_eq!(updates.commitment_signed.htlc_signatures.len(), 1);
6472 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.commitment_signed);
6473 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6474 let _bs_responses = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
6476 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6478 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6479 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
6480 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote skipped HTLC ID \(skipped ID: \d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6481 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6482 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
6486 fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fulfill_htlc_before_commitment() {
6487 //BOLT 2 Requirement: until the corresponding HTLC is irrevocably committed in both sides' commitment transactions: MUST NOT send an update_fulfill_htlc, update_fail_htlc, or update_fail_malformed_htlc.
6489 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6490 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6491 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6492 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6493 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6494 let (route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
6495 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6496 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6498 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6499 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6500 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6502 let update_msg = msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC{
6505 payment_preimage: our_payment_preimage,
6508 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
6510 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6511 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
6512 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6513 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6514 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
6518 fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fail_htlc_before_commitment() {
6519 //BOLT 2 Requirement: until the corresponding HTLC is irrevocably committed in both sides' commitment transactions: MUST NOT send an update_fulfill_htlc, update_fail_htlc, or update_fail_malformed_htlc.
6521 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6522 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6523 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6524 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6525 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6527 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
6528 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6529 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6530 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6531 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6532 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6534 let update_msg = msgs::UpdateFailHTLC{
6537 reason: msgs::OnionErrorPacket { data: Vec::new()},
6540 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
6542 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6543 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
6544 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6545 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6546 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
6550 fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fail_malformed_htlc_before_commitment() {
6551 //BOLT 2 Requirement: until the corresponding HTLC is irrevocably committed in both sides' commitment transactions: MUST NOT send an update_fulfill_htlc, update_fail_htlc, or update_fail_malformed_htlc.
6553 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6554 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6555 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6556 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6557 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6559 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
6560 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6561 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6562 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6563 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6564 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6565 let update_msg = msgs::UpdateFailMalformedHTLC{
6568 sha256_of_onion: [1; 32],
6569 failure_code: 0x8000,
6572 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
6574 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6575 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
6576 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6577 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6578 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
6582 fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_incorrect_htlc_id() {
6583 //BOLT 2 Requirement: A receiving node: if the id does not correspond to an HTLC in its current commitment transaction MUST fail the channel.
6585 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6586 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6587 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6588 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6589 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6591 let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100_000);
6593 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
6594 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6595 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, 100_000);
6597 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6598 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
6599 let mut update_fulfill_msg: msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC = {
6601 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
6602 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
6603 assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
6604 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
6605 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
6606 assert!(update_fee.is_none());
6607 update_fulfill_htlcs[0].clone()
6609 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6613 update_fulfill_msg.htlc_id = 1;
6615 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fulfill_msg);
6617 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6618 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
6619 assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote tried to fulfill/fail an HTLC we couldn't find");
6620 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6621 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
6625 fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_wrong_preimage() {
6626 //BOLT 2 Requirement: A receiving node: if the payment_preimage value in update_fulfill_htlc doesn't SHA256 hash to the corresponding HTLC payment_hash MUST fail the channel.
6628 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6629 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6630 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6631 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6632 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6634 let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100_000);
6636 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
6637 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6638 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, 100_000);
6640 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6641 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
6642 let mut update_fulfill_msg: msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC = {
6644 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
6645 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
6646 assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
6647 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
6648 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
6649 assert!(update_fee.is_none());
6650 update_fulfill_htlcs[0].clone()
6652 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6656 update_fulfill_msg.payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([1; 32]);
6658 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fulfill_msg);
6660 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6661 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
6662 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill HTLC \(\d+\) with an incorrect preimage").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
6663 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6664 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
6668 fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_missing_badonion_bit_for_malformed_htlc_message() {
6669 //BOLT 2 Requirement: A receiving node: if the BADONION bit in failure_code is not set for update_fail_malformed_htlc MUST fail the channel.
6671 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6672 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6673 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6674 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6675 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 1000000);
6677 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
6678 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6679 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6680 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6682 let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6683 updates.update_add_htlcs[0].onion_routing_packet.version = 1; //Produce a malformed HTLC message
6685 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
6686 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
6687 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
6689 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6691 let mut update_msg: msgs::UpdateFailMalformedHTLC = {
6693 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
6694 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
6695 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
6696 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
6697 assert_eq!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 1);
6698 assert!(update_fee.is_none());
6699 update_fail_malformed_htlcs[0].clone()
6701 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6704 update_msg.failure_code &= !0x8000;
6705 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
6707 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
6708 let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
6709 assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Got update_fail_malformed_htlc with BADONION not set");
6710 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6711 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
6715 fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_after_malformed_htlc_message_must_forward_update_fail_htlc() {
6716 //BOLT 2 Requirement: a receiving node which has an outgoing HTLC canceled by update_fail_malformed_htlc:
6717 // * MUST return an error in the update_fail_htlc sent to the link which originally sent the HTLC, using the failure_code given and setting the data to sha256_of_onion.
6719 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
6720 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
6721 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
6722 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6723 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 1000000);
6724 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 1000000, 1000000);
6726 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 100000);
6729 let mut payment_event = {
6730 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6731 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6732 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6733 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6734 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
6735 SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
6737 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
6738 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
6739 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
6740 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
6741 let mut events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6742 assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
6743 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6744 payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events_2.remove(0));
6745 assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
6748 payment_event.msgs[0].onion_routing_packet.version = 1; //Produce a malformed HTLC message
6749 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
6750 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
6751 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], payment_event.commitment_msg, false, true);
6753 let events_3 = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6754 assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
6755 let update_msg : (msgs::UpdateFailMalformedHTLC, msgs::CommitmentSigned) = {
6757 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
6758 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
6759 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
6760 assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
6761 assert_eq!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 1);
6762 assert!(update_fee.is_none());
6763 (update_fail_malformed_htlcs[0].clone(), commitment_signed.clone())
6765 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6769 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg.0);
6771 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
6772 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], update_msg.1, false, true);
6773 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
6774 let events_4 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6775 assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
6777 //Confirm that handlinge the update_malformed_htlc message produces an update_fail_htlc message to be forwarded back along the route
6779 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
6780 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
6781 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
6782 assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
6783 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
6784 assert!(update_fee.is_none());
6786 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6789 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6793 fn test_channel_failed_after_message_with_badonion_node_perm_bits_set() {
6794 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
6795 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
6796 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
6797 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6798 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6799 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
6801 let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 100_000);
6804 let mut payment_event = {
6805 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
6806 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
6807 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6808 SendEvent::from_node(&nodes[0])
6811 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
6812 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
6813 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
6814 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6815 payment_event = SendEvent::from_node(&nodes[1]);
6816 assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
6819 payment_event.msgs[0].onion_routing_packet.version = 1; // Trigger an invalid_onion_version error
6820 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
6821 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
6822 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], payment_event.commitment_msg, false, true);
6824 let events_3 = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6825 assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
6827 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref updates, .. } => {
6828 let mut update_msg = updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs[0].clone();
6829 // Set the NODE bit (BADONION and PERM already set in invalid_onion_version error)
6830 update_msg.failure_code |= 0x2000;
6832 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
6833 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
6835 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6838 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1],
6839 vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel {
6840 node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
6841 let events_4 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6842 assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
6843 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6846 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref updates, .. } => {
6847 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
6848 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
6850 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6853 let events_5 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
6854 assert_eq!(events_5.len(), 2);
6856 // Expect a PaymentPathFailed event with a ChannelFailure network update for the channel between
6857 // the node originating the error to its next hop.
6859 Event::PaymentPathFailed { error_code, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(NetworkUpdate::ChannelFailure { short_channel_id, is_permanent }) }, ..
6861 assert_eq!(short_channel_id, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id);
6862 assert!(is_permanent);
6863 assert_eq!(error_code, Some(0x8000|0x4000|0x2000|4));
6865 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6868 Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
6869 assert_eq!(payment_hash, our_payment_hash);
6871 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6874 // TODO: Test actual removal of channel from NetworkGraph when it's implemented.
6877 fn do_test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment(announce_latest: bool) {
6878 // Dust-HTLC failure updates must be delayed until failure-trigger tx (in this case local commitment) reach ANTI_REORG_DELAY
6879 // We can have at most two valid local commitment tx, so both cases must be covered, and both txs must be checked to get them all as
6880 // HTLC could have been removed from lastest local commitment tx but still valid until we get remote RAA
6882 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
6883 chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
6884 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
6885 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
6886 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6887 let chan =create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6889 let bs_dust_limit = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id())
6890 .unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().context.holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
6892 // We route 2 dust-HTLCs between A and B
6893 let (_, payment_hash_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], bs_dust_limit*1000);
6894 let (_, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], bs_dust_limit*1000);
6895 route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
6897 // Cache one local commitment tx as previous
6898 let as_prev_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
6900 // Fail one HTLC to prune it in the will-be-latest-local commitment tx
6901 nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_2);
6902 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
6903 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_2 }]);
6904 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
6906 let remove = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
6907 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &remove.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
6908 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &remove.commitment_signed);
6909 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6911 // Cache one local commitment tx as lastest
6912 let as_last_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
6914 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
6916 MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { node_id, .. } => {
6917 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6919 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6922 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id, .. } => {
6923 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
6925 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6928 assert_ne!(as_prev_commitment_tx, as_last_commitment_tx);
6929 // Fail the 2 dust-HTLCs, move their failure in maturation buffer (htlc_updated_waiting_threshold_conf)
6930 if announce_latest {
6931 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_last_commitment_tx[0]);
6933 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_prev_commitment_tx[0]);
6936 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
6937 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
6938 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
6940 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
6941 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
6942 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
6943 // Only 2 PaymentPathFailed events should show up, over-dust HTLC has to be failed by timeout tx
6944 assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
6945 let mut first_failed = false;
6946 for event in events {
6948 Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
6949 if payment_hash == payment_hash_1 {
6950 assert!(!first_failed);
6951 first_failed = true;
6953 assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_2);
6956 Event::PaymentFailed { .. } => {}
6957 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
6963 fn test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment() {
6964 do_test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment(true);
6965 do_test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment(false);
6968 fn do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(revoked: bool, local: bool) {
6969 // Outbound HTLC-failure updates must be cancelled if we get a reorg before we reach ANTI_REORG_DELAY.
6970 // Broadcast of revoked remote commitment tx, trigger failure-update of dust/non-dust HTLCs
6971 // Broadcast of remote commitment tx, trigger failure-update of dust-HTLCs
6972 // Broadcast of timeout tx on remote commitment tx, trigger failure-udate of non-dust HTLCs
6973 // Broadcast of local commitment tx, trigger failure-update of dust-HTLCs
6974 // Broadcast of HTLC-timeout tx on local commitment tx, trigger failure-update of non-dust HTLCs
6976 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
6977 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
6978 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
6979 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
6980 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
6982 let bs_dust_limit = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id())
6983 .unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().context.holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
6985 let (_payment_preimage_1, dust_hash, _payment_secret_1) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], bs_dust_limit*1000);
6986 let (_payment_preimage_2, non_dust_hash, _payment_secret_2) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
6988 let as_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
6989 let bs_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2);
6991 // We revoked bs_commitment_tx
6993 let (payment_preimage_3, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
6994 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_3);
6997 let mut timeout_tx = Vec::new();
6999 // We fail dust-HTLC 1 by broadcast of local commitment tx
7000 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_commitment_tx[0]);
7001 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
7002 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
7003 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], dust_hash, false);
7005 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS - ANTI_REORG_DELAY);
7006 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
7007 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
7008 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
7009 timeout_tx.push(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap()[0].clone());
7010 assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
7011 // We fail non-dust-HTLC 2 by broadcast of local HTLC-timeout tx on local commitment tx
7012 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
7013 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &timeout_tx[0]);
7014 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
7015 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], non_dust_hash, false);
7017 // We fail dust-HTLC 1 by broadcast of remote commitment tx. If revoked, fail also non-dust HTLC
7018 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &bs_commitment_tx[0]);
7019 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
7020 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
7021 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
7022 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
7024 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
7025 timeout_tx = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().drain(..)
7026 .filter(|tx| tx.input[0].previous_output.txid == bs_commitment_tx[0].txid()).collect();
7027 check_spends!(timeout_tx[0], bs_commitment_tx[0]);
7028 // For both a revoked or non-revoked commitment transaction, after ANTI_REORG_DELAY the
7029 // dust HTLC should have been failed.
7030 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], dust_hash, false);
7033 assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
7035 assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].lock_time.0, 11);
7037 // We fail non-dust-HTLC 2 by broadcast of local timeout/revocation-claim tx
7038 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &timeout_tx[0]);
7039 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
7040 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
7041 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], non_dust_hash, false);
7046 fn test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update() {
7047 do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(false, true);
7048 do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(false, false);
7049 do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(true, false);
7053 fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() {
7054 // We test our channel constructors yield errors when we pass them absurd csv delay
7056 let mut low_our_to_self_config = UserConfig::default();
7057 low_our_to_self_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6;
7058 let mut high_their_to_self_config = UserConfig::default();
7059 high_their_to_self_config.channel_handshake_limits.their_to_self_delay = 100;
7060 let user_cfgs = [Some(high_their_to_self_config.clone()), None];
7061 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7062 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7063 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &user_cfgs);
7064 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7066 // We test config.our_to_self > BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT is enforced in OutboundV1Channel::new()
7067 if let Err(error) = OutboundV1Channel::new(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
7068 &nodes[0].keys_manager, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[1].node.init_features(), 1000000, 1000000, 0,
7069 &low_our_to_self_config, 0, 42)
7072 APIError::APIMisuseError { err } => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
7073 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7075 } else { assert!(false) }
7077 // We test config.our_to_self > BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT is enforced in InboundV1Channel::new()
7078 nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
7079 let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7080 open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
7081 if let Err(error) = InboundV1Channel::new(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
7082 &nodes[0].keys_manager, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[0].node.channel_type_features(), &nodes[1].node.init_features(), &open_channel, 0,
7083 &low_our_to_self_config, 0, &nodes[0].logger, /*is_0conf=*/false)
7086 ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
7087 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7089 } else { assert!(false); }
7091 // We test msg.to_self_delay <= config.their_to_self_delay is enforced in Chanel::accept_channel()
7092 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
7093 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
7094 let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7095 accept_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
7096 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel);
7098 if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref action, .. } = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events()[0] {
7100 &ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg } => {
7101 assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(msg.data.as_str()));
7102 reason_msg = msg.data.clone();
7106 } else { panic!(); }
7107 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: reason_msg }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
7109 // We test msg.to_self_delay <= config.their_to_self_delay is enforced in InboundV1Channel::new()
7110 nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
7111 let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7112 open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
7113 if let Err(error) = InboundV1Channel::new(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
7114 &nodes[0].keys_manager, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[0].node.channel_type_features(), &nodes[1].node.init_features(), &open_channel, 0,
7115 &high_their_to_self_config, 0, &nodes[0].logger, /*is_0conf=*/false)
7118 ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
7119 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7121 } else { assert!(false); }
7125 fn test_check_htlc_underpaying() {
7126 // Send payment through A -> B but A is maliciously
7127 // sending a probe payment (i.e less than expected value0
7128 // to B, B should refuse payment.
7130 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7131 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7132 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7133 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7135 // Create some initial channels
7136 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
7138 let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::new();
7139 let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
7140 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV).with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
7141 let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_params, &nodes[0].network_graph.read_only(), None, 10_000, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
7142 let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
7143 let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(our_payment_hash, Some(100_000), 7200, None).unwrap();
7144 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
7145 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
7146 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
7148 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7149 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
7150 let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
7151 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
7152 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
7154 // Note that we first have to wait a random delay before processing the receipt of the HTLC,
7155 // and then will wait a second random delay before failing the HTLC back:
7156 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
7157 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
7159 // Node 3 is expecting payment of 100_000 but received 10_000,
7160 // it should fail htlc like we didn't know the preimage.
7161 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
7163 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7164 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
7165 let (update_fail_htlc, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
7166 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
7167 assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
7168 assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
7169 assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
7170 assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
7171 assert!(update_fee.is_none());
7172 (update_fail_htlcs[0].clone(), commitment_signed)
7174 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7176 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
7178 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlc);
7179 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false, true);
7181 // 10_000 msat as u64, followed by a height of CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH as u32
7182 let mut expected_failure_data = (10_000 as u64).to_be_bytes().to_vec();
7183 expected_failure_data.extend_from_slice(&CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH.to_be_bytes());
7184 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, 0x4000|15, &expected_failure_data[..]);
7188 fn test_announce_disable_channels() {
7189 // Create 2 channels between A and B. Disconnect B. Call timer_tick_occurred and check for generated
7190 // ChannelUpdate. Reconnect B, reestablish and check there is non-generated ChannelUpdate.
7192 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7193 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7194 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7195 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7197 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
7198 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 0);
7199 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
7202 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7203 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7205 for _ in 0..DISABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS + 1 {
7206 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
7208 let msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7209 assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 3);
7210 let mut chans_disabled = HashMap::new();
7211 for e in msg_events {
7213 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
7214 assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & (1<<1), 1<<1); // The "channel disabled" bit should be set
7215 // Check that each channel gets updated exactly once
7216 if chans_disabled.insert(msg.contents.short_channel_id, msg.contents.timestamp).is_some() {
7217 panic!("Generated ChannelUpdate for wrong chan!");
7220 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7224 nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
7225 features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
7227 let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
7228 assert_eq!(reestablish_1.len(), 3);
7229 nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
7230 features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
7232 let reestablish_2 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
7233 assert_eq!(reestablish_2.len(), 3);
7235 // Reestablish chan_1
7236 nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[0]);
7237 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
7238 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[0]);
7239 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
7240 // Reestablish chan_2
7241 nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[1]);
7242 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
7243 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[1]);
7244 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
7245 // Reestablish chan_3
7246 nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[2]);
7247 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
7248 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[2]);
7249 handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
7251 for _ in 0..ENABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS {
7252 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
7254 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
7255 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
7256 let msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7257 assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 3);
7258 for e in msg_events {
7260 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
7261 assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & (1<<1), 0); // The "channel disabled" bit should be off
7262 match chans_disabled.remove(&msg.contents.short_channel_id) {
7263 // Each update should have a higher timestamp than the previous one, replacing
7265 Some(prev_timestamp) => assert!(msg.contents.timestamp > prev_timestamp),
7266 None => panic!("Generated ChannelUpdate for wrong chan!"),
7269 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7272 // Check that each channel gets updated exactly once
7273 assert!(chans_disabled.is_empty());
7277 fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_commitment() {
7278 // In case of penalty txn with too low feerates for getting into mempools, RBF-bump them to be sure
7279 // we're able to claim outputs on revoked commitment transaction before timelocks expiration
7281 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7282 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7283 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7284 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7286 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000);
7288 let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
7289 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 30)
7290 .with_bolt11_features(nodes[0].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
7291 let (route,_, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_params, 3000000);
7292 send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3000000);
7294 let revoked_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
7295 // Revoked commitment txn with 4 outputs : to_local, to_remote, 1 outgoing HTLC, 1 incoming HTLC
7296 assert_eq!(revoked_txn[0].output.len(), 4);
7297 assert_eq!(revoked_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7298 assert_eq!(revoked_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
7299 let revoked_txid = revoked_txn[0].txid();
7301 let mut penalty_sum = 0;
7302 for outp in revoked_txn[0].output.iter() {
7303 if outp.script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh() {
7304 penalty_sum += outp.value;
7308 // Connect blocks to change height_timer range to see if we use right soonest_timelock
7309 let header_114 = connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 14);
7311 // Actually revoke tx by claiming a HTLC
7312 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
7313 connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(header_114, 42, vec![revoked_txn[0].clone()]));
7314 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
7316 // One or more justice tx should have been broadcast, check it
7320 let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7321 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // justice tx (broadcasted from ChannelMonitor)
7322 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Penalty txn claims to_local, offered_htlc and received_htlc outputs
7323 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
7324 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_txn[0]);
7325 let fee_1 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
7326 feerate_1 = fee_1 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
7327 penalty_1 = node_txn[0].txid();
7331 // After exhaustion of height timer, a new bumped justice tx should have been broadcast, check it
7332 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 15);
7333 let mut penalty_2 = penalty_1;
7334 let mut feerate_2 = 0;
7336 let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7337 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
7338 if node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid == revoked_txid {
7339 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Penalty txn claims to_local, offered_htlc and received_htlc outputs
7340 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
7341 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_txn[0]);
7342 penalty_2 = node_txn[0].txid();
7343 // Verify new bumped tx is different from last claiming transaction, we don't want spurrious rebroadcast
7344 assert_ne!(penalty_2, penalty_1);
7345 let fee_2 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
7346 feerate_2 = fee_2 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
7347 // Verify 25% bump heuristic
7348 assert!(feerate_2 * 100 >= feerate_1 * 125);
7352 assert_ne!(feerate_2, 0);
7354 // After exhaustion of height timer for a 2nd time, a new bumped justice tx should have been broadcast, check it
7355 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
7357 let mut feerate_3 = 0;
7359 let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7360 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
7361 if node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid == revoked_txid {
7362 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Penalty txn claims to_local, offered_htlc and received_htlc outputs
7363 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
7364 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_txn[0]);
7365 penalty_3 = node_txn[0].txid();
7366 // Verify new bumped tx is different from last claiming transaction, we don't want spurrious rebroadcast
7367 assert_ne!(penalty_3, penalty_2);
7368 let fee_3 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
7369 feerate_3 = fee_3 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
7370 // Verify 25% bump heuristic
7371 assert!(feerate_3 * 100 >= feerate_2 * 125);
7375 assert_ne!(feerate_3, 0);
7377 nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7378 nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7382 fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_htlcs() {
7383 // In case of penalty txn with too low feerates for getting into mempools, RBF-bump them to sure
7384 // we're able to claim outputs on revoked HTLC transactions before timelocks expiration
7386 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7387 chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
7388 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7389 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7390 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7392 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000);
7393 // Lock HTLC in both directions (using a slightly lower CLTV delay to provide timely RBF bumps)
7394 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 50).with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
7395 let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::new();
7396 let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
7397 let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_params, &nodes[0].network_graph.read_only(), None,
7398 3_000_000, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
7399 let payment_preimage = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
7400 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 50).with_bolt11_features(nodes[0].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
7401 let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_params, &nodes[1].network_graph.read_only(), None,
7402 3_000_000, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
7403 send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
7405 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2);
7406 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7407 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
7409 // Revoke local commitment tx
7410 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
7412 // B will generate both revoked HTLC-timeout/HTLC-preimage txn from revoked commitment tx
7413 connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone()]));
7414 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
7415 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
7416 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
7417 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 50); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires (note CLTV was explicitly 50 above)
7419 let revoked_htlc_txn = {
7420 let txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.unique_txn_broadcast();
7421 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 2);
7423 assert_eq!(txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
7424 assert_eq!(txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7425 check_spends!(txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7427 assert_eq!(txn[1].input.len(), 1);
7428 assert_eq!(txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
7429 assert_eq!(txn[1].output.len(), 1);
7430 check_spends!(txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7435 // Broadcast set of revoked txn on A
7436 let hash_128 = connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 40);
7437 let block_11 = create_dummy_block(hash_128, 42, vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone()]);
7438 connect_block(&nodes[0], &block_11);
7439 let block_129 = create_dummy_block(block_11.block_hash(), 42, vec![revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[1].clone()]);
7440 connect_block(&nodes[0], &block_129);
7441 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7442 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[0], events[0..1], true);
7443 match events.last().unwrap() {
7444 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
7445 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7451 let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7452 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 4); // 3 penalty txn on revoked commitment tx + 1 penalty tnx on revoked HTLC txn
7453 // Verify claim tx are spending revoked HTLC txn
7455 // node_txn 0-2 each spend a separate revoked output from revoked_local_txn[0]
7456 // Note that node_txn[0] and node_txn[1] are bogus - they double spend the revoked_htlc_txn
7457 // which are included in the same block (they are broadcasted because we scan the
7458 // transactions linearly and generate claims as we go, they likely should be removed in the
7460 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7461 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7462 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
7463 check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7464 assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input.len(), 1);
7465 check_spends!(node_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7467 // Each of the three justice transactions claim a separate (single) output of the three
7468 // available, which we check here:
7469 assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
7470 assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output);
7471 assert_ne!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output);
7473 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
7474 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
7476 // node_txn[3] spends the revoked outputs from the revoked_htlc_txn (which only have one
7477 // output, checked above).
7478 assert_eq!(node_txn[3].input.len(), 2);
7479 assert_eq!(node_txn[3].output.len(), 1);
7480 check_spends!(node_txn[3], revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[1]);
7482 first = node_txn[3].txid();
7483 // Store both feerates for later comparison
7484 let fee_1 = revoked_htlc_txn[0].output[0].value + revoked_htlc_txn[1].output[0].value - node_txn[3].output[0].value;
7485 feerate_1 = fee_1 * 1000 / node_txn[3].weight() as u64;
7486 penalty_txn = vec![node_txn[2].clone()];
7490 // Connect one more block to see if bumped penalty are issued for HTLC txn
7491 let block_130 = create_dummy_block(block_129.block_hash(), 42, penalty_txn);
7492 connect_block(&nodes[0], &block_130);
7493 let block_131 = create_dummy_block(block_130.block_hash(), 42, Vec::new());
7494 connect_block(&nodes[0], &block_131);
7496 // Few more blocks to confirm penalty txn
7497 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 4);
7498 assert!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
7499 let header_144 = connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 9);
7501 let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7502 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
7504 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 2);
7505 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[1]);
7506 // Verify bumped tx is different and 25% bump heuristic
7507 assert_ne!(first, node_txn[0].txid());
7508 let fee_2 = revoked_htlc_txn[0].output[0].value + revoked_htlc_txn[1].output[0].value - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
7509 let feerate_2 = fee_2 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
7510 assert!(feerate_2 * 100 > feerate_1 * 125);
7511 let txn = vec![node_txn[0].clone()];
7515 // Broadcast claim txn and confirm blocks to avoid further bumps on this outputs
7516 connect_block(&nodes[0], &create_dummy_block(header_144, 42, node_txn));
7517 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 20);
7519 let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7520 // We verify than no new transaction has been broadcast because previously
7521 // we were buggy on this exact behavior by not tracking for monitoring remote HTLC outputs (see #411)
7522 // which means we wouldn't see a spend of them by a justice tx and bumped justice tx
7523 // were generated forever instead of safe cleaning after confirmation and ANTI_REORG_SAFE_DELAY blocks.
7524 // Enforce spending of revoked htlc output by claiming transaction remove request as expected and dry
7525 // up bumped justice generation.
7526 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 0);
7529 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
7530 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
7534 fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_remote_commitment() {
7535 // In case of claim txn with too low feerates for getting into mempools, RBF-bump them to be sure
7536 // we're able to claim outputs on remote commitment transaction before timelocks expiration
7539 // Provide preimage for one
7540 // Check aggregation
7542 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7543 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7544 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7545 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7547 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000);
7548 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000);
7549 route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3000000).0;
7551 // Remote commitment txn with 4 outputs : to_local, to_remote, 1 outgoing HTLC, 1 incoming HTLC
7552 let remote_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
7553 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output.len(), 4);
7554 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7555 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
7557 // Claim a HTLC without revocation (provide B monitor with preimage)
7558 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
7559 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 3_000_000);
7560 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &remote_txn[0]);
7561 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
7562 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
7564 // One or more claim tx should have been broadcast, check it
7568 let feerate_timeout;
7569 let feerate_preimage;
7571 let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7572 // 3 transactions including:
7573 // preimage and timeout sweeps from remote commitment + preimage sweep bump
7574 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 3);
7575 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7576 assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
7577 assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input.len(), 1);
7578 check_spends!(node_txn[0], remote_txn[0]);
7579 check_spends!(node_txn[1], remote_txn[0]);
7580 check_spends!(node_txn[2], remote_txn[0]);
7582 preimage = node_txn[0].txid();
7583 let index = node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout;
7584 let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
7585 feerate_preimage = fee * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
7587 let (preimage_bump_tx, timeout_tx) = if node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output == node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output {
7588 (node_txn[2].clone(), node_txn[1].clone())
7590 (node_txn[1].clone(), node_txn[2].clone())
7593 preimage_bump = preimage_bump_tx;
7594 check_spends!(preimage_bump, remote_txn[0]);
7595 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, preimage_bump.input[0].previous_output);
7597 timeout = timeout_tx.txid();
7598 let index = timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout;
7599 let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - timeout_tx.output[0].value;
7600 feerate_timeout = fee * 1000 / timeout_tx.weight() as u64;
7604 assert_ne!(feerate_timeout, 0);
7605 assert_ne!(feerate_preimage, 0);
7607 // After exhaustion of height timer, new bumped claim txn should have been broadcast, check it
7608 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
7610 let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7611 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
7612 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7613 assert_eq!(preimage_bump.input.len(), 1);
7614 check_spends!(node_txn[0], remote_txn[0]);
7615 check_spends!(preimage_bump, remote_txn[0]);
7617 let index = preimage_bump.input[0].previous_output.vout;
7618 let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - preimage_bump.output[0].value;
7619 let new_feerate = fee * 1000 / preimage_bump.weight() as u64;
7620 assert!(new_feerate * 100 > feerate_timeout * 125);
7621 assert_ne!(timeout, preimage_bump.txid());
7623 let index = node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout;
7624 let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
7625 let new_feerate = fee * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
7626 assert!(new_feerate * 100 > feerate_preimage * 125);
7627 assert_ne!(preimage, node_txn[0].txid());
7632 nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7633 nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7637 fn test_counterparty_raa_skip_no_crash() {
7638 // Previously, if our counterparty sent two RAAs in a row without us having provided a
7639 // commitment transaction, we would have happily carried on and provided them the next
7640 // commitment transaction based on one RAA forward. This would probably eventually have led to
7641 // channel closure, but it would not have resulted in funds loss. Still, our
7642 // EnforcingSigner would have panicked as it doesn't like jumps into the future. Here, we
7643 // check simply that the channel is closed in response to such an RAA, but don't check whether
7644 // we decide to punish our counterparty for revoking their funds (as we don't currently
7646 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7647 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7648 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7649 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7650 let channel_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).2;
7652 let per_commitment_secret;
7653 let next_per_commitment_point;
7655 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
7656 let mut guard = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
7657 let keys = guard.channel_by_id.get_mut(&channel_id).unwrap().get_signer();
7659 const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = (1 << 48) - 1;
7661 // Make signer believe we got a counterparty signature, so that it allows the revocation
7662 keys.as_ecdsa().unwrap().get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
7663 per_commitment_secret = keys.as_ref().release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER);
7665 // Must revoke without gaps
7666 keys.as_ecdsa().unwrap().get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
7667 keys.as_ref().release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1);
7669 keys.as_ecdsa().unwrap().get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
7670 next_per_commitment_point = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(),
7671 &SecretKey::from_slice(&keys.as_ref().release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2)).unwrap());
7674 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(),
7675 &msgs::RevokeAndACK {
7677 per_commitment_secret,
7678 next_per_commitment_point,
7680 next_local_nonce: None,
7682 assert_eq!(check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap().data, "Received an unexpected revoke_and_ack");
7683 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
7684 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Received an unexpected revoke_and_ack".to_string() }
7685 , [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
7689 fn test_bump_txn_sanitize_tracking_maps() {
7690 // Sanitizing pendning_claim_request and claimable_outpoints used to be buggy,
7691 // verify we clean then right after expiration of ANTI_REORG_DELAY.
7693 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7694 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7695 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7696 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7698 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000);
7699 // Lock HTLC in both directions
7700 let (payment_preimage_1, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9_000_000);
7701 let (_, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 9_000_000);
7703 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2);
7704 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
7705 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
7707 // Revoke local commitment tx
7708 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
7710 // Broadcast set of revoked txn on A
7711 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 2 - CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH);
7712 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[0], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_2 }]);
7713 assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 0);
7715 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
7716 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
7717 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
7718 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
7720 let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
7721 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 3); //ChannelMonitor: justice txn * 3
7722 check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7723 check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7724 check_spends!(node_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0]);
7725 let penalty_txn = vec![node_txn[0].clone(), node_txn[1].clone(), node_txn[2].clone()];
7729 connect_block(&nodes[0], &create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), 42, penalty_txn));
7730 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
7732 let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(OutPoint { txid: chan.3.txid(), index: 0 }).unwrap();
7733 assert!(monitor.inner.lock().unwrap().onchain_tx_handler.pending_claim_requests.is_empty());
7734 assert!(monitor.inner.lock().unwrap().onchain_tx_handler.claimable_outpoints.is_empty());
7739 fn test_channel_conf_timeout() {
7740 // Tests that, for inbound channels, we give up on them if the funding transaction does not
7741 // confirm within 2016 blocks, as recommended by BOLT 2.
7742 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7743 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7744 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7745 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7747 let _funding_tx = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_init(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 1_000_000, 100_000);
7749 // The outbound node should wait forever for confirmation:
7750 // This matches `channel::FUNDING_CONF_DEADLINE_BLOCKS` and BOLT 2's suggested timeout, thus is
7751 // copied here instead of directly referencing the constant.
7752 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 2016);
7753 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
7755 // The inbound node should fail the channel after exactly 2016 blocks
7756 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 2015);
7757 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
7758 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
7760 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
7761 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
7762 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::FundingTimedOut, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
7763 let close_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7764 assert_eq!(close_ev.len(), 1);
7766 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, ref node_id } => {
7767 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7768 assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because funding transaction failed to confirm within 2016 blocks");
7770 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7775 fn test_override_channel_config() {
7776 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7777 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7778 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
7779 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7781 // Node0 initiates a channel to node1 using the override config.
7782 let mut override_config = UserConfig::default();
7783 override_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 200;
7785 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 16_000_000, 12_000_000, 42, Some(override_config)).unwrap();
7787 // Assert the channel created by node0 is using the override config.
7788 let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7789 assert_eq!(res.channel_flags, 0);
7790 assert_eq!(res.to_self_delay, 200);
7794 fn test_override_0msat_htlc_minimum() {
7795 let mut zero_config = UserConfig::default();
7796 zero_config.channel_handshake_config.our_htlc_minimum_msat = 0;
7797 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7798 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7799 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(zero_config.clone())]);
7800 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7802 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 16_000_000, 12_000_000, 42, Some(zero_config)).unwrap();
7803 let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7804 assert_eq!(res.htlc_minimum_msat, 1);
7806 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
7807 let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7808 assert_eq!(res.htlc_minimum_msat, 1);
7812 fn test_channel_update_has_correct_htlc_maximum_msat() {
7813 // Tests that the `ChannelUpdate` message has the correct values for `htlc_maximum_msat` set.
7814 // Bolt 7 specifies that if present `htlc_maximum_msat`:
7815 // 1. MUST be set to less than or equal to the channel capacity. In LDK, this is capped to
7816 // 90% of the `channel_value`.
7817 // 2. MUST be set to less than or equal to the `max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat` received from the peer.
7819 let mut config_30_percent = UserConfig::default();
7820 config_30_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
7821 config_30_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 30;
7822 let mut config_50_percent = UserConfig::default();
7823 config_50_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
7824 config_50_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 50;
7825 let mut config_95_percent = UserConfig::default();
7826 config_95_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
7827 config_95_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 95;
7828 let mut config_100_percent = UserConfig::default();
7829 config_100_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
7830 config_100_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 100;
7832 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
7833 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
7834 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config_30_percent), Some(config_50_percent), Some(config_95_percent), Some(config_100_percent)]);
7835 let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7837 let channel_value_satoshis = 100000;
7838 let channel_value_msat = channel_value_satoshis * 1000;
7839 let channel_value_30_percent_msat = (channel_value_msat as f64 * 0.3) as u64;
7840 let channel_value_50_percent_msat = (channel_value_msat as f64 * 0.5) as u64;
7841 let channel_value_90_percent_msat = (channel_value_msat as f64 * 0.9) as u64;
7843 let (node_0_chan_update, node_1_chan_update, _, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value_satoshis, 10001);
7844 let (node_2_chan_update, node_3_chan_update, _, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, channel_value_satoshis, 10001);
7846 // Assert that `node[0]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 50 percent of the `channel_value`, as
7847 // that's the value of `node[1]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat`.
7848 assert_eq!(node_0_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_50_percent_msat);
7849 // Assert that `node[1]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 30 percent of the `channel_value`, as
7850 // that's the value of `node[0]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat`.
7851 assert_eq!(node_1_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_30_percent_msat);
7853 // Assert that `node[2]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 90 percent of the `channel_value`, as
7854 // the value of `node[3]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat` (100%), exceeds 90% of the
7856 assert_eq!(node_2_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_90_percent_msat);
7857 // Assert that `node[3]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 90 percent of the `channel_value`, as
7858 // the value of `node[2]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat` (95%), exceeds 90% of the
7860 assert_eq!(node_3_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_90_percent_msat);
7864 fn test_manually_accept_inbound_channel_request() {
7865 let mut manually_accept_conf = UserConfig::default();
7866 manually_accept_conf.manually_accept_inbound_channels = true;
7867 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7868 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7869 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(manually_accept_conf.clone())]);
7870 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7872 let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
7873 let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7875 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
7877 // Assert that `nodes[1]` has no `MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel` in `msg_events` before
7878 // accepting the inbound channel request.
7879 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
7881 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7883 Event::OpenChannelRequest { temporary_channel_id, .. } => {
7884 nodes[1].node.accept_inbound_channel(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 23).unwrap();
7886 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7889 let accept_msg_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7890 assert_eq!(accept_msg_ev.len(), 1);
7892 match accept_msg_ev[0] {
7893 MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel { ref node_id, .. } => {
7894 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7896 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7899 nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&temp_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
7901 let close_msg_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7902 assert_eq!(close_msg_ev.len(), 1);
7904 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7906 Event::ChannelClosed { user_channel_id, .. } => {
7907 assert_eq!(user_channel_id, 23);
7909 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7914 fn test_manually_reject_inbound_channel_request() {
7915 let mut manually_accept_conf = UserConfig::default();
7916 manually_accept_conf.manually_accept_inbound_channels = true;
7917 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7918 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7919 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(manually_accept_conf.clone())]);
7920 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7922 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
7923 let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7925 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
7927 // Assert that `nodes[1]` has no `MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel` in `msg_events` before
7928 // rejecting the inbound channel request.
7929 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
7931 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7933 Event::OpenChannelRequest { temporary_channel_id, .. } => {
7934 nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
7936 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7939 let close_msg_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7940 assert_eq!(close_msg_ev.len(), 1);
7942 match close_msg_ev[0] {
7943 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref node_id, .. } => {
7944 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7946 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7949 // There should be no more events to process, as the channel was never opened.
7950 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
7954 fn test_can_not_accept_inbound_channel_twice() {
7955 let mut manually_accept_conf = UserConfig::default();
7956 manually_accept_conf.manually_accept_inbound_channels = true;
7957 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
7958 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
7959 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(manually_accept_conf.clone())]);
7960 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
7962 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
7963 let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
7965 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
7967 // Assert that `nodes[1]` has no `MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel` in `msg_events` before
7968 // accepting the inbound channel request.
7969 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
7971 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
7973 Event::OpenChannelRequest { temporary_channel_id, .. } => {
7974 nodes[1].node.accept_inbound_channel(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 0).unwrap();
7975 let api_res = nodes[1].node.accept_inbound_channel(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 0);
7977 Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => {
7978 assert_eq!(err, "No such channel awaiting to be accepted.");
7980 Ok(_) => panic!("Channel shouldn't be possible to be accepted twice"),
7981 Err(e) => panic!("Unexpected Error {:?}", e),
7984 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
7987 // Ensure that the channel wasn't closed after attempting to accept it twice.
7988 let accept_msg_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
7989 assert_eq!(accept_msg_ev.len(), 1);
7991 match accept_msg_ev[0] {
7992 MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel { ref node_id, .. } => {
7993 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
7995 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8000 fn test_can_not_accept_unknown_inbound_channel() {
8001 let chanmon_cfg = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8002 let node_cfg = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfg);
8003 let node_chanmgr = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfg, &[None, None]);
8004 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfg, &node_chanmgr);
8006 let unknown_channel_id = [0; 32];
8007 let api_res = nodes[0].node.accept_inbound_channel(&unknown_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 0);
8009 Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => {
8010 assert_eq!(err, "No such channel awaiting to be accepted.");
8012 Ok(_) => panic!("It shouldn't be possible to accept an unkown channel"),
8013 Err(e) => panic!("Unexpected Error: {:?}", e),
8018 fn test_onion_value_mpp_set_calculation() {
8019 // Test that we use the onion value `amt_to_forward` when
8020 // calculating whether we've reached the `total_msat` of an MPP
8021 // by having a routing node forward more than `amt_to_forward`
8022 // and checking that the receiving node doesn't generate
8023 // a PaymentClaimable event too early
8025 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(node_count);
8026 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(node_count, &chanmon_cfgs);
8027 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(node_count, &node_cfgs, &vec![None; node_count]);
8028 let mut nodes = create_network(node_count, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8030 let chan_1_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8031 let chan_2_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8032 let chan_3_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8033 let chan_4_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8035 let total_msat = 100_000;
8036 let expected_paths: &[&[&Node]] = &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]];
8037 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(&nodes[0], nodes[3], total_msat);
8038 let sample_path = route.paths.pop().unwrap();
8040 let mut path_1 = sample_path.clone();
8041 path_1.hops[0].pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
8042 path_1.hops[0].short_channel_id = chan_1_id;
8043 path_1.hops[1].pubkey = nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id();
8044 path_1.hops[1].short_channel_id = chan_3_id;
8045 path_1.hops[1].fee_msat = 100_000;
8046 route.paths.push(path_1);
8048 let mut path_2 = sample_path.clone();
8049 path_2.hops[0].pubkey = nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id();
8050 path_2.hops[0].short_channel_id = chan_2_id;
8051 path_2.hops[1].pubkey = nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id();
8052 path_2.hops[1].short_channel_id = chan_4_id;
8053 path_2.hops[1].fee_msat = 1_000;
8054 route.paths.push(path_2);
8057 let payment_id = PaymentId(nodes[0].keys_manager.backing.get_secure_random_bytes());
8058 let onion_session_privs = nodes[0].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(our_payment_hash,
8059 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), payment_id, &route).unwrap();
8060 nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_internal(&route, our_payment_hash,
8061 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), None, payment_id, Some(total_msat), onion_session_privs).unwrap();
8062 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], expected_paths.len());
8064 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8065 assert_eq!(events.len(), expected_paths.len());
8068 let ev = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&expected_paths[0][0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
8069 let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(ev);
8070 let mut prev_node = &nodes[0];
8072 for (idx, &node) in expected_paths[0].iter().enumerate() {
8073 assert_eq!(node.node.get_our_node_id(), payment_event.node_id);
8075 if idx == 0 { // routing node
8076 let session_priv = [3; 32];
8077 let height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1;
8078 let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&session_priv).unwrap();
8079 let mut onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::new(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
8080 let (mut onion_payloads, _, _) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 100_000,
8081 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), height + 1, &None).unwrap();
8082 // Edit amt_to_forward to simulate the sender having set
8083 // the final amount and the routing node taking less fee
8084 if let msgs::OutboundOnionPayload::Receive { ref mut amt_msat, .. } = onion_payloads[1] {
8087 let new_onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash).unwrap();
8088 payment_event.msgs[0].onion_routing_packet = new_onion_packet;
8091 node.node.handle_update_add_htlc(&prev_node.node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
8092 check_added_monitors!(node, 0);
8093 commitment_signed_dance!(node, prev_node, payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
8094 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(node);
8097 let mut events_2 = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8098 assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
8099 check_added_monitors!(node, 1);
8100 payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events_2.remove(0));
8101 assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
8103 let events_2 = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
8104 assert!(events_2.is_empty());
8111 let ev = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&expected_paths[1][0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
8112 pass_along_path(&nodes[0], expected_paths[1], 101_000, our_payment_hash.clone(), Some(our_payment_secret), ev, true, None);
8114 claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], expected_paths, false, our_payment_preimage);
8117 fn do_test_overshoot_mpp(msat_amounts: &[u64], total_msat: u64) {
8119 let routing_node_count = msat_amounts.len();
8120 let node_count = routing_node_count + 2;
8122 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(node_count);
8123 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(node_count, &chanmon_cfgs);
8124 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(node_count, &node_cfgs, &vec![None; node_count]);
8125 let nodes = create_network(node_count, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8130 // Create channels for each amount
8131 let mut expected_paths = Vec::with_capacity(routing_node_count);
8132 let mut src_chan_ids = Vec::with_capacity(routing_node_count);
8133 let mut dst_chan_ids = Vec::with_capacity(routing_node_count);
8134 for i in 0..routing_node_count {
8135 let routing_node = 2 + i;
8136 let src_chan_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, src_idx, routing_node).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8137 src_chan_ids.push(src_chan_id);
8138 let dst_chan_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, routing_node, dst_idx).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8139 dst_chan_ids.push(dst_chan_id);
8140 let path = vec![&nodes[routing_node], &nodes[dst_idx]];
8141 expected_paths.push(path);
8143 let expected_paths: Vec<&[&Node]> = expected_paths.iter().map(|route| route.as_slice()).collect();
8145 // Create a route for each amount
8146 let example_amount = 100000;
8147 let (mut route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(&nodes[src_idx], nodes[dst_idx], example_amount);
8148 let sample_path = route.paths.pop().unwrap();
8149 for i in 0..routing_node_count {
8150 let routing_node = 2 + i;
8151 let mut path = sample_path.clone();
8152 path.hops[0].pubkey = nodes[routing_node].node.get_our_node_id();
8153 path.hops[0].short_channel_id = src_chan_ids[i];
8154 path.hops[1].pubkey = nodes[dst_idx].node.get_our_node_id();
8155 path.hops[1].short_channel_id = dst_chan_ids[i];
8156 path.hops[1].fee_msat = msat_amounts[i];
8157 route.paths.push(path);
8160 // Send payment with manually set total_msat
8161 let payment_id = PaymentId(nodes[src_idx].keys_manager.backing.get_secure_random_bytes());
8162 let onion_session_privs = nodes[src_idx].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(our_payment_hash,
8163 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), payment_id, &route).unwrap();
8164 nodes[src_idx].node.test_send_payment_internal(&route, our_payment_hash,
8165 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), None, payment_id, Some(total_msat), onion_session_privs).unwrap();
8166 check_added_monitors!(nodes[src_idx], expected_paths.len());
8168 let mut events = nodes[src_idx].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8169 assert_eq!(events.len(), expected_paths.len());
8170 let mut amount_received = 0;
8171 for (path_idx, expected_path) in expected_paths.iter().enumerate() {
8172 let ev = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&expected_path[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
8174 let current_path_amount = msat_amounts[path_idx];
8175 amount_received += current_path_amount;
8176 let became_claimable_now = amount_received >= total_msat && amount_received - current_path_amount < total_msat;
8177 pass_along_path(&nodes[src_idx], expected_path, amount_received, our_payment_hash.clone(), Some(our_payment_secret), ev, became_claimable_now, None);
8180 claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[src_idx], &expected_paths, false, our_payment_preimage);
8184 fn test_overshoot_mpp() {
8185 do_test_overshoot_mpp(&[100_000, 101_000], 200_000);
8186 do_test_overshoot_mpp(&[100_000, 10_000, 100_000], 200_000);
8190 fn test_simple_mpp() {
8191 // Simple test of sending a multi-path payment.
8192 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
8193 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
8194 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
8195 let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8197 let chan_1_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8198 let chan_2_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8199 let chan_3_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8200 let chan_4_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8202 let (mut route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(&nodes[0], nodes[3], 100000);
8203 let path = route.paths[0].clone();
8204 route.paths.push(path);
8205 route.paths[0].hops[0].pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
8206 route.paths[0].hops[0].short_channel_id = chan_1_id;
8207 route.paths[0].hops[1].short_channel_id = chan_3_id;
8208 route.paths[1].hops[0].pubkey = nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id();
8209 route.paths[1].hops[0].short_channel_id = chan_2_id;
8210 route.paths[1].hops[1].short_channel_id = chan_4_id;
8211 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[0], route, &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], 200_000, payment_hash, payment_secret);
8212 claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, payment_preimage);
8216 fn test_preimage_storage() {
8217 // Simple test of payment preimage storage allowing no client-side storage to claim payments
8218 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8219 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8220 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8221 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8223 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8226 let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 7200, None).unwrap();
8227 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000);
8228 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
8229 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
8230 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
8231 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8232 let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
8233 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
8234 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
8236 // Note that after leaving the above scope we have no knowledge of any arguments or return
8237 // values from previous calls.
8238 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
8239 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
8240 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8242 Event::PaymentClaimable { ref purpose, .. } => {
8244 PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, .. } => {
8245 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage.unwrap());
8247 _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
8250 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8255 fn test_bad_secret_hash() {
8256 // Simple test of unregistered payment hash/invalid payment secret handling
8257 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8258 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8259 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8260 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8262 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).0.contents.short_channel_id;
8264 let random_payment_hash = PaymentHash([42; 32]);
8265 let random_payment_secret = PaymentSecret([43; 32]);
8266 let (our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2, None).unwrap();
8267 let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000);
8269 // All the below cases should end up being handled exactly identically, so we macro the
8270 // resulting events.
8271 macro_rules! handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data {
8272 ($payment_hash: expr) => {
8273 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
8274 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8275 let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
8276 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
8277 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
8279 // We have to forward pending HTLCs once to process the receipt of the HTLC and then
8280 // again to process the pending backwards-failure of the HTLC
8281 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
8282 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment{ payment_hash: $payment_hash }]);
8283 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
8285 // We should fail the payment back
8286 let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8287 match events.pop().unwrap() {
8288 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_fail_htlcs, commitment_signed, .. } } => {
8289 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[0]);
8290 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false);
8292 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8297 let expected_error_code = 0x4000|15; // incorrect_or_unknown_payment_details
8298 // Error data is the HTLC value (100,000) and current block height
8299 let expected_error_data = [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0x86, 0xa0, 0, 0, 0, CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH as u8];
8301 // Send a payment with the right payment hash but the wrong payment secret
8302 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
8303 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(random_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
8304 handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!(our_payment_hash);
8305 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
8307 // Send a payment with a random payment hash, but the right payment secret
8308 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, random_payment_hash,
8309 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(random_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
8310 handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!(random_payment_hash);
8311 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], random_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
8313 // Send a payment with a random payment hash and random payment secret
8314 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, random_payment_hash,
8315 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(random_payment_secret), PaymentId(random_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
8316 handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!(random_payment_hash);
8317 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], random_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
8321 fn test_update_err_monitor_lockdown() {
8322 // Our monitor will lock update of local commitment transaction if a broadcastion condition
8323 // has been fulfilled (either force-close from Channel or block height requiring a HTLC-
8324 // timeout). Trying to update monitor after lockdown should return a ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus
8327 // This scenario may happen in a watchtower setup, where watchtower process a block height
8328 // triggering a timeout while a slow-block-processing ChannelManager receives a local signed
8329 // commitment at same time.
8331 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8332 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8333 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8334 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8336 // Create some initial channel
8337 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
8338 let outpoint = OutPoint { txid: chan_1.3.txid(), index: 0 };
8340 // Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
8341 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 10_000_000);
8343 // Route a HTLC from node 0 to node 1 (but don't settle)
8344 let (preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 9_000_000);
8346 // Copy ChainMonitor to simulate a watchtower and update block height of node 0 until its ChannelMonitor timeout HTLC onchain
8347 let chain_source = test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet);
8348 let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::with_id(format!("node {}", 0));
8349 let persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
8352 let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(outpoint).unwrap();
8353 let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<EnforcingSigner>)>::read(
8354 &mut io::Cursor::new(&monitor.encode()), (nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[0].keys_manager)).unwrap().1;
8355 assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
8358 let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &persister, &node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
8359 assert_eq!(watchtower.watch_channel(outpoint, new_monitor), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
8362 let block = create_dummy_block(BlockHash::all_zeros(), 42, Vec::new());
8363 // Make the tx_broadcaster aware of enough blocks that it doesn't think we're violating
8364 // transaction lock time requirements here.
8365 chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster.blocks.lock().unwrap().resize(200, (block.clone(), 200));
8366 watchtower.chain_monitor.block_connected(&block, 200);
8368 // Try to update ChannelMonitor
8369 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(preimage);
8370 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
8371 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 9_000_000);
8373 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8374 assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
8375 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
8377 let mut node_0_per_peer_lock;
8378 let mut node_0_peer_state_lock;
8379 let mut channel = get_channel_ref!(nodes[0], nodes[1], node_0_per_peer_lock, node_0_peer_state_lock, chan_1.2);
8380 if let Ok(Some(update)) = channel.commitment_signed(&updates.commitment_signed, &node_cfgs[0].logger) {
8381 assert_eq!(watchtower.chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure);
8382 assert_eq!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
8383 } else { assert!(false); }
8385 // Our local monitor is in-sync and hasn't processed yet timeout
8386 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
8387 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
8388 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8392 fn test_concurrent_monitor_claim() {
8393 // Watchtower A receives block, broadcasts state N, then channel receives new state N+1,
8394 // sending it to both watchtowers, Bob accepts N+1, then receives block and broadcasts
8395 // the latest state N+1, Alice rejects state N+1, but Bob has already broadcast it,
8396 // state N+1 confirms. Alice claims output from state N+1.
8398 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8399 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8400 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8401 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8403 // Create some initial channel
8404 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
8405 let outpoint = OutPoint { txid: chan_1.3.txid(), index: 0 };
8407 // Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
8408 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 10_000_000);
8410 // Route a HTLC from node 0 to node 1 (but don't settle)
8411 route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9_000_000).0;
8413 // Copy ChainMonitor to simulate watchtower Alice and update block height her ChannelMonitor timeout HTLC onchain
8414 let chain_source = test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet);
8415 let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::with_id(format!("node {}", "Alice"));
8416 let persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
8417 let alice_broadcaster = test_utils::TestBroadcaster::with_blocks(
8418 Arc::new(Mutex::new(nodes[0].blocks.lock().unwrap().clone())),
8420 let watchtower_alice = {
8422 let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(outpoint).unwrap();
8423 let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<EnforcingSigner>)>::read(
8424 &mut io::Cursor::new(&monitor.encode()), (nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[0].keys_manager)).unwrap().1;
8425 assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
8428 let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &alice_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &persister, &node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
8429 assert_eq!(watchtower.watch_channel(outpoint, new_monitor), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
8432 let block = create_dummy_block(BlockHash::all_zeros(), 42, Vec::new());
8433 // Make Alice aware of enough blocks that it doesn't think we're violating transaction lock time
8434 // requirements here.
8435 const HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST: u32 = CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS;
8436 alice_broadcaster.blocks.lock().unwrap().resize((HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST) as usize, (block.clone(), HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST));
8437 watchtower_alice.chain_monitor.block_connected(&block, HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST);
8439 // Watchtower Alice should have broadcast a commitment/HTLC-timeout
8441 let mut txn = alice_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
8442 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 2);
8446 // Copy ChainMonitor to simulate watchtower Bob and make it receive a commitment update first.
8447 let chain_source = test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet);
8448 let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::with_id(format!("node {}", "Bob"));
8449 let persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
8450 let bob_broadcaster = test_utils::TestBroadcaster::with_blocks(Arc::clone(&alice_broadcaster.blocks));
8451 let watchtower_bob = {
8453 let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(outpoint).unwrap();
8454 let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<EnforcingSigner>)>::read(
8455 &mut io::Cursor::new(&monitor.encode()), (nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[0].keys_manager)).unwrap().1;
8456 assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
8459 let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &bob_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &persister, &node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
8460 assert_eq!(watchtower.watch_channel(outpoint, new_monitor), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
8463 watchtower_bob.chain_monitor.block_connected(&create_dummy_block(BlockHash::all_zeros(), 42, Vec::new()), HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST - 1);
8465 // Route another payment to generate another update with still previous HTLC pending
8466 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 3000000);
8467 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
8468 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
8469 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
8471 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8472 assert_eq!(updates.update_add_htlcs.len(), 1);
8473 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
8475 let mut node_0_per_peer_lock;
8476 let mut node_0_peer_state_lock;
8477 let mut channel = get_channel_ref!(nodes[0], nodes[1], node_0_per_peer_lock, node_0_peer_state_lock, chan_1.2);
8478 if let Ok(Some(update)) = channel.commitment_signed(&updates.commitment_signed, &node_cfgs[0].logger) {
8479 // Watchtower Alice should already have seen the block and reject the update
8480 assert_eq!(watchtower_alice.chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure);
8481 assert_eq!(watchtower_bob.chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
8482 assert_eq!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
8483 } else { assert!(false); }
8485 // Our local monitor is in-sync and hasn't processed yet timeout
8486 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
8488 //// Provide one more block to watchtower Bob, expect broadcast of commitment and HTLC-Timeout
8489 watchtower_bob.chain_monitor.block_connected(&create_dummy_block(BlockHash::all_zeros(), 42, Vec::new()), HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST);
8491 // Watchtower Bob should have broadcast a commitment/HTLC-timeout
8494 let mut txn = bob_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
8495 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 2);
8496 bob_state_y = txn.remove(0);
8499 // We confirm Bob's state Y on Alice, she should broadcast a HTLC-timeout
8500 let height = HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST + 1;
8501 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
8502 check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[0], 1, true);
8503 check_closed_event!(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, false,
8504 [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
8505 watchtower_alice.chain_monitor.block_connected(&create_dummy_block(BlockHash::all_zeros(), 42, vec![bob_state_y.clone()]), height);
8506 check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
8508 let htlc_txn = alice_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
8509 assert_eq!(htlc_txn.len(), 2);
8510 check_spends!(htlc_txn[0], bob_state_y);
8511 // Alice doesn't clean up the old HTLC claim since it hasn't seen a conflicting spend for
8512 // it. However, she should, because it now has an invalid parent.
8513 check_spends!(htlc_txn[1], alice_state);
8518 fn test_pre_lockin_no_chan_closed_update() {
8519 // Test that if a peer closes a channel in response to a funding_created message we don't
8520 // generate a channel update (as the channel cannot appear on chain without a funding_signed
8523 // Doing so would imply a channel monitor update before the initial channel monitor
8524 // registration, violating our API guarantees.
8526 // Previously, full_stack_target managed to hit this case by opening then closing a channel,
8527 // then opening a second channel with the same funding output as the first (which is not
8528 // rejected because the first channel does not exist in the ChannelManager) and closing it
8529 // before receiving funding_signed.
8530 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8531 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8532 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8533 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8535 // Create an initial channel
8536 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
8537 let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8538 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
8539 let accept_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8540 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_chan_msg);
8542 // Move the first channel through the funding flow...
8543 let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42);
8545 nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
8546 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
8548 let funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8549 let channel_id = crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index }.to_channel_id();
8550 nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id, data: "Hi".to_owned() });
8551 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
8552 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 2, ClosureReason::CounterpartyForceClosed { peer_msg: UntrustedString("Hi".to_string()) }, true,
8553 [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(); 2], 100000);
8557 fn test_htlc_no_detection() {
8558 // This test is a mutation to underscore the detection logic bug we had
8559 // before #653. HTLC value routed is above the remaining balance, thus
8560 // inverting HTLC and `to_remote` output. HTLC will come second and
8561 // it wouldn't be seen by pre-#653 detection as we were enumerate()'ing
8562 // on a watched outputs vector (Vec<TxOut>) thus implicitly relying on
8563 // outputs order detection for correct spending children filtring.
8565 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8566 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8567 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8568 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8570 // Create some initial channels
8571 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
8573 send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 1_000_000);
8574 let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 2_000_000);
8575 let local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
8576 assert_eq!(local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
8577 assert_eq!(local_txn[0].output.len(), 3);
8578 check_spends!(local_txn[0], chan_1.3);
8580 // Timeout HTLC on A's chain and so it can generate a HTLC-Timeout tx
8581 let block = create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![local_txn[0].clone()]);
8582 connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
8583 // We deliberately connect the local tx twice as this should provoke a failure calling
8584 // this test before #653 fix.
8585 chain::Listen::block_connected(&nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor, &block, nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1);
8586 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
8587 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
8588 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
8589 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV);
8591 let htlc_timeout = {
8592 let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
8593 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
8594 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
8595 assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
8596 check_spends!(node_txn[0], local_txn[0]);
8600 connect_block(&nodes[0], &create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![htlc_timeout.clone()]));
8601 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
8602 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false);
8605 fn do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(broadcast_alice: bool, go_onchain_before_fulfill: bool) {
8606 // If we route an HTLC, then learn the HTLC's preimage after the upstream channel has been
8607 // force-closed, we must claim that HTLC on-chain. (Given an HTLC forwarded from Alice --> Bob -->
8608 // Carol, Alice would be the upstream node, and Carol the downstream.)
8610 // Steps of the test:
8611 // 1) Alice sends a HTLC to Carol through Bob.
8612 // 2) Carol doesn't settle the HTLC.
8613 // 3) If broadcast_alice is true, Alice force-closes her channel with Bob. Else Bob force closes.
8614 // Steps 4 and 5 may be reordered depending on go_onchain_before_fulfill.
8615 // 4) Bob sees the Alice's commitment on his chain or vice versa. An offered output is present
8616 // but can't be claimed as Bob doesn't have yet knowledge of the preimage.
8617 // 5) Carol release the preimage to Bob off-chain.
8618 // 6) Bob claims the offered output on the broadcasted commitment.
8619 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
8620 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
8621 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
8622 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8624 // Create some initial channels
8625 let chan_ab = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
8626 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 100000, 10001);
8628 // Steps (1) and (2):
8629 // Send an HTLC Alice --> Bob --> Carol, but Carol doesn't settle the HTLC back.
8630 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3_000_000);
8632 // Check that Alice's commitment transaction now contains an output for this HTLC.
8633 let alice_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_ab.2);
8634 check_spends!(alice_txn[0], chan_ab.3);
8635 assert_eq!(alice_txn[0].output.len(), 2);
8636 check_spends!(alice_txn[1], alice_txn[0]); // 2nd transaction is a non-final HTLC-timeout
8637 assert_eq!(alice_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
8638 assert_eq!(alice_txn.len(), 2);
8640 // Steps (3) and (4):
8641 // If `go_onchain_before_fufill`, broadcast the relevant commitment transaction and check that Bob
8642 // responds by (1) broadcasting a channel update and (2) adding a new ChannelMonitor.
8643 let mut force_closing_node = 0; // Alice force-closes
8644 let mut counterparty_node = 1; // Bob if Alice force-closes
8647 if !broadcast_alice {
8648 force_closing_node = 1;
8649 counterparty_node = 0;
8651 nodes[force_closing_node].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_ab.2, &nodes[counterparty_node].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
8652 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[force_closing_node], true);
8653 check_added_monitors!(nodes[force_closing_node], 1);
8654 check_closed_event!(nodes[force_closing_node], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[counterparty_node].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
8655 if go_onchain_before_fulfill {
8656 let txn_to_broadcast = match broadcast_alice {
8657 true => alice_txn.clone(),
8658 false => get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_ab.2)
8660 connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![txn_to_broadcast[0].clone()]));
8661 if broadcast_alice {
8662 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
8663 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
8664 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
8669 // Carol then claims the funds and sends an update_fulfill message to Bob, and they go through the
8670 // process of removing the HTLC from their commitment transactions.
8671 nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
8672 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
8673 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], payment_hash, 3_000_000);
8675 let carol_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8676 assert!(carol_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
8677 assert!(carol_updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
8678 assert!(carol_updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
8679 assert!(carol_updates.update_fee.is_none());
8680 assert_eq!(carol_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
8682 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
8683 expect_payment_forwarded!(nodes[1], nodes[0], nodes[2], if go_onchain_before_fulfill || force_closing_node == 1 { None } else { Some(1000) }, false, false);
8684 // If Alice broadcasted but Bob doesn't know yet, here he prepares to tell her about the preimage.
8685 if !go_onchain_before_fulfill && broadcast_alice {
8686 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8687 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8689 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, .. } => {
8690 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8692 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8695 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_updates.commitment_signed);
8696 // One monitor update for the preimage to update the Bob<->Alice channel, one monitor update
8697 // Carol<->Bob's updated commitment transaction info.
8698 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
8700 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8701 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
8702 let bob_revocation = match events[0] {
8703 MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
8704 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
8707 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8709 let bob_updates = match events[1] {
8710 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, ref updates } => {
8711 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
8714 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8717 nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_revocation);
8718 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
8719 nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_updates.commitment_signed);
8720 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
8722 let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8723 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8724 let carol_revocation = match events[0] {
8725 MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
8726 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8729 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8731 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_revocation);
8732 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
8734 // If this test requires the force-closed channel to not be on-chain until after the fulfill,
8735 // here's where we put said channel's commitment tx on-chain.
8736 let mut txn_to_broadcast = alice_txn.clone();
8737 if !broadcast_alice { txn_to_broadcast = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_ab.2); }
8738 if !go_onchain_before_fulfill {
8739 connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![txn_to_broadcast[0].clone()]));
8740 // If Bob was the one to force-close, he will have already passed these checks earlier.
8741 if broadcast_alice {
8742 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
8743 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
8744 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
8746 let mut bob_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
8747 if broadcast_alice {
8748 assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 1);
8749 check_spends!(bob_txn[0], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
8751 assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 2);
8752 check_spends!(bob_txn[0], chan_ab.3);
8757 // Finally, check that Bob broadcasted a preimage-claiming transaction for the HTLC output on the
8758 // broadcasted commitment transaction.
8760 let script_weight = match broadcast_alice {
8761 true => OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT,
8762 false => ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT
8764 // If Alice force-closed, Bob only broadcasts a HTLC-output-claiming transaction. Otherwise,
8765 // Bob force-closed and broadcasts the commitment transaction along with a
8766 // HTLC-output-claiming transaction.
8767 let bob_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
8768 if broadcast_alice {
8769 assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 1);
8770 check_spends!(bob_txn[0], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
8771 assert_eq!(bob_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), script_weight);
8773 assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 2);
8774 check_spends!(bob_txn[1], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
8775 assert_eq!(bob_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), script_weight);
8781 fn test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close() {
8782 do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(true, true);
8783 do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(false, true); // Technically redundant, but may as well
8784 do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(true, false);
8785 do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(false, false);
8789 fn test_duplicate_temporary_channel_id_from_different_peers() {
8790 // Tests that we can accept two different `OpenChannel` requests with the same
8791 // `temporary_channel_id`, as long as they are from different peers.
8792 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
8793 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
8794 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
8795 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8797 // Create an first channel channel
8798 nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
8799 let mut open_chan_msg_chan_1_0 = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8801 // Create an second channel
8802 nodes[2].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 43, None).unwrap();
8803 let mut open_chan_msg_chan_2_0 = get_event_msg!(nodes[2], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8805 // Modify the `OpenChannel` from `nodes[2]` to `nodes[0]` to ensure that it uses the same
8806 // `temporary_channel_id` as the `OpenChannel` from nodes[1] to nodes[0].
8807 open_chan_msg_chan_2_0.temporary_channel_id = open_chan_msg_chan_1_0.temporary_channel_id;
8809 // Assert that `nodes[0]` can accept both `OpenChannel` requests, even though they use the same
8810 // `temporary_channel_id` as they are from different peers.
8811 nodes[0].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg_chan_1_0);
8813 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8814 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8816 MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel { node_id, msg } => {
8817 assert_eq!(node_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8818 assert_eq!(msg.temporary_channel_id, open_chan_msg_chan_1_0.temporary_channel_id);
8820 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8824 nodes[0].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg_chan_2_0);
8826 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8827 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8829 MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel { node_id, msg } => {
8830 assert_eq!(node_id, &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
8831 assert_eq!(msg.temporary_channel_id, open_chan_msg_chan_1_0.temporary_channel_id);
8833 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8839 fn test_duplicate_chan_id() {
8840 // Test that if a given peer tries to open a channel with the same channel_id as one that is
8841 // already open we reject it and keep the old channel.
8843 // Previously, full_stack_target managed to figure out that if you tried to open two channels
8844 // with the same funding output (ie post-funding channel_id), we'd create a monitor update for
8845 // the existing channel when we detect the duplicate new channel, screwing up our monitor
8846 // updating logic for the existing channel.
8847 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
8848 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
8849 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
8850 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8852 // Create an initial channel
8853 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
8854 let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8855 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
8856 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
8858 // Try to create a second channel with the same temporary_channel_id as the first and check
8859 // that it is rejected.
8860 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
8862 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8863 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8865 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
8866 // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both the
8867 // first (valid) and second (invalid) channels are closed, given they both have
8868 // the same non-temporary channel_id. However, currently we do not, so we just
8869 // move forward with it.
8870 assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id);
8871 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8873 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8877 // Move the first channel through the funding flow...
8878 let (temporary_channel_id, tx, funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42);
8880 nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
8881 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
8883 let mut funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8884 nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msg);
8886 let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
8887 assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
8888 assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
8889 added_monitors.clear();
8891 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8893 let funding_signed_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8895 let funding_outpoint = crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index };
8896 let channel_id = funding_outpoint.to_channel_id();
8898 // Now we have the first channel past funding_created (ie it has a txid-based channel_id, not a
8901 // First try to open a second channel with a temporary channel id equal to the txid-based one.
8902 // Technically this is allowed by the spec, but we don't support it and there's little reason
8903 // to. Still, it shouldn't cause any other issues.
8904 open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id = channel_id;
8905 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
8907 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8908 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8910 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
8911 // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both
8912 // channels are closed, but currently we do not, so we just move forward with it.
8913 assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id);
8914 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8916 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8920 // Now try to create a second channel which has a duplicate funding output.
8921 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
8922 let open_chan_2_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8923 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_2_msg);
8924 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
8925 create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42); // Get and check the FundingGenerationReady event
8927 let (_, funding_created) = {
8928 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
8929 let mut a_peer_state = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
8930 // Once we call `get_funding_created` the channel has a duplicate channel_id as
8931 // another channel in the ChannelManager - an invalid state. Thus, we'd panic later when we
8932 // try to create another channel. Instead, we drop the channel entirely here (leaving the
8933 // channelmanager in a possibly nonsense state instead).
8934 let mut as_chan = a_peer_state.outbound_v1_channel_by_id.remove(&open_chan_2_msg.temporary_channel_id).unwrap();
8935 let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
8936 as_chan.get_funding_created(tx.clone(), funding_outpoint, &&logger).map_err(|_| ()).unwrap()
8938 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
8939 nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created);
8940 // At this point we'll look up if the channel_id is present and immediately fail the channel
8941 // without trying to persist the `ChannelMonitor`.
8942 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
8944 // ...still, nodes[1] will reject the duplicate channel.
8946 let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
8947 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
8949 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
8950 // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both
8951 // channels are closed, but currently we do not, so we just move forward with it.
8952 assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, channel_id);
8953 assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
8955 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
8959 // finally, finish creating the original channel and send a payment over it to make sure
8960 // everything is functional.
8961 nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed_msg);
8963 let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
8964 assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
8965 assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
8966 added_monitors.clear();
8968 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
8970 let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
8971 assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 0);
8972 assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 1);
8973 assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap()[0], tx);
8975 let (channel_ready, _) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx);
8976 let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &channel_ready);
8977 update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update);
8979 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8000000);
8983 fn test_error_chans_closed() {
8984 // Test that we properly handle error messages, closing appropriate channels.
8986 // Prior to #787 we'd allow a peer to make us force-close a channel we had with a different
8987 // peer. The "real" fix for that is to index channels with peers_ids, however in the mean time
8988 // we can test various edge cases around it to ensure we don't regress.
8989 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
8990 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
8991 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
8992 let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
8994 // Create some initial channels
8995 let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
8996 let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
8997 let chan_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 2, 100000, 10001);
8999 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 3);
9000 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 2);
9001 assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 1);
9003 // Closing a channel from a different peer has no effect
9004 nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: chan_3.2, data: "ERR".to_owned() });
9005 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 3);
9007 // Closing one channel doesn't impact others
9008 nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: chan_2.2, data: "ERR".to_owned() });
9009 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9010 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], false);
9011 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CounterpartyForceClosed { peer_msg: UntrustedString("ERR".to_string()) },
9012 [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
9013 assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0).len(), 1);
9014 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 2);
9015 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[0].channel_id == chan_1.2 || nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[1].channel_id == chan_1.2);
9016 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[0].channel_id == chan_3.2 || nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[1].channel_id == chan_3.2);
9018 // A null channel ID should close all channels
9019 let _chan_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
9020 nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: [0; 32], data: "ERR".to_owned() });
9021 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 2);
9022 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 2, ClosureReason::CounterpartyForceClosed { peer_msg: UntrustedString("ERR".to_string()) },
9023 [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(); 2], 100000);
9024 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9025 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
9027 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
9028 assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & 2, 2);
9030 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
9033 MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
9034 assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & 2, 2);
9036 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
9038 // Note that at this point users of a standard PeerHandler will end up calling
9039 // peer_disconnected.
9040 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 1);
9041 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[0].channel_id == chan_3.2);
9043 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9044 assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 1);
9045 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[0].channel_id == chan_3.2);
9049 fn test_invalid_funding_tx() {
9050 // Test that we properly handle invalid funding transactions sent to us from a peer.
9052 // Previously, all other major lightning implementations had failed to properly sanitize
9053 // funding transactions from their counterparties, leading to a multi-implementation critical
9054 // security vulnerability (though we always sanitized properly, we've previously had
9055 // un-released crashes in the sanitization process).
9057 // Further, if the funding transaction is consensus-valid, confirms, and is later spent, we'd
9058 // previously have crashed in `ChannelMonitor` even though we closed the channel as bogus and
9059 // gave up on it. We test this here by generating such a transaction.
9060 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9061 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9062 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
9063 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9065 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 10_000, 42, None).unwrap();
9066 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
9067 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
9069 let (temporary_channel_id, mut tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 42);
9071 // Create a witness program which can be spent by a 4-empty-stack-elements witness and which is
9072 // 136 bytes long. This matches our "accepted HTLC preimage spend" matching, previously causing
9073 // a panic as we'd try to extract a 32 byte preimage from a witness element without checking
9075 let mut wit_program: Vec<u8> = channelmonitor::deliberately_bogus_accepted_htlc_witness_program();
9076 let wit_program_script: Script = wit_program.into();
9077 for output in tx.output.iter_mut() {
9078 // Make the confirmed funding transaction have a bogus script_pubkey
9079 output.script_pubkey = Script::new_v0_p2wsh(&wit_program_script.wscript_hash());
9082 nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated_unchecked(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone(), 0).unwrap();
9083 nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
9084 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9085 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9087 nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
9088 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9089 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9091 let events_1 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
9092 assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 0);
9094 assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 1);
9095 assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap()[0], tx);
9096 nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clear();
9098 let expected_err = "funding tx had wrong script/value or output index";
9099 confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[1], &tx, 1);
9100 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: expected_err.to_string() },
9101 [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
9102 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9103 let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9104 assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
9105 if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { node_id, action } = &events_2[0] {
9106 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9107 if let msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { msg } = action {
9108 assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because of an exception: ".to_owned() + expected_err);
9109 } else { panic!(); }
9110 } else { panic!(); }
9111 assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
9113 // Now confirm a spend of the (bogus) funding transaction. As long as the witness is 5 elements
9114 // long the ChannelMonitor will try to read 32 bytes from the second-to-last element, panicing
9115 // as its not 32 bytes long.
9116 let mut spend_tx = Transaction {
9117 version: 2i32, lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO,
9118 input: tx.output.iter().enumerate().map(|(idx, _)| TxIn {
9119 previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint {
9123 script_sig: Script::new(),
9124 sequence: Sequence::ENABLE_RBF_NO_LOCKTIME,
9125 witness: Witness::from_vec(channelmonitor::deliberately_bogus_accepted_htlc_witness())
9127 output: vec![TxOut {
9129 script_pubkey: Script::new(),
9132 check_spends!(spend_tx, tx);
9133 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &spend_tx);
9136 fn do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(test_height_before_timelock: bool) {
9137 // In the first version of the chain::Confirm interface, after a refactor was made to not
9138 // broadcast CSV-locked transactions until their CSV lock is up, we wouldn't reliably broadcast
9139 // transactions after a `transactions_confirmed` call. Specifically, if the chain, provided via
9140 // `best_block_updated` is at height N, and a transaction output which we wish to spend at
9141 // height N-1 (due to a CSV to height N-1) is provided at height N, we will not broadcast the
9142 // spending transaction until height N+1 (or greater). This was due to the way
9143 // `ChannelMonitor::transactions_confirmed` worked, only checking if we should broadcast a
9144 // spending transaction at the height the input transaction was confirmed at, not whether we
9145 // should broadcast a spending transaction at the current height.
9146 // A second, similar, issue involved failing HTLCs backwards - because we only provided the
9147 // height at which transactions were confirmed to `OnchainTx::update_claims_view`, it wasn't
9148 // aware that the anti-reorg-delay had, in fact, already expired, waiting to fail-backwards
9149 // until we learned about an additional block.
9151 // As an additional check, if `test_height_before_timelock` is set, we instead test that we
9152 // aren't broadcasting transactions too early (ie not broadcasting them at all).
9153 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
9154 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
9155 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
9156 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9157 *nodes[0].connect_style.borrow_mut() = ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstSkippingBlocks;
9159 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
9160 let (chan_announce, _, channel_id, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
9161 let (_, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1_000_000);
9162 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
9163 nodes[2].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9165 nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&channel_id, &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
9166 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
9167 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
9168 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9169 let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
9170 assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
9172 let conf_height = nodes[1].best_block_info().1;
9173 if !test_height_before_timelock {
9174 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 24 * 6);
9176 nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.transactions_confirmed(
9177 &nodes[1].get_block_header(conf_height), &[(0, &node_txn[0])], conf_height);
9178 if test_height_before_timelock {
9179 // If we confirmed the close transaction, but timelocks have not yet expired, we should not
9180 // generate any events or broadcast any transactions
9181 assert!(nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
9182 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
9184 // We should broadcast an HTLC transaction spending our funding transaction first
9185 let spending_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
9186 assert_eq!(spending_txn.len(), 2);
9187 assert_eq!(spending_txn[0].txid(), node_txn[0].txid());
9188 check_spends!(spending_txn[1], node_txn[0]);
9189 // We should also generate a SpendableOutputs event with the to_self output (as its
9191 let descriptor_spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
9192 assert_eq!(descriptor_spend_txn.len(), 1);
9194 // If we also discover that the HTLC-Timeout transaction was confirmed some time ago, we
9195 // should immediately fail-backwards the HTLC to the previous hop, without waiting for an
9196 // additional block built on top of the current chain.
9197 nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.transactions_confirmed(
9198 &nodes[1].get_block_header(conf_height + 1), &[(0, &spending_txn[1])], conf_height + 1);
9199 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: channel_id }]);
9200 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9202 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9203 assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
9204 assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
9205 assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
9206 assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
9207 assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
9208 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
9209 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], updates.commitment_signed, true, true);
9210 expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false, chan_announce.contents.short_channel_id, true);
9215 fn test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast() {
9216 do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(false);
9217 do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(true);
9220 fn do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(test_for_second_fail_panic: bool) {
9221 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9222 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9223 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
9224 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9226 let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
9228 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
9229 .with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
9230 let route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, 10_000).unwrap();
9232 let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[1]);
9235 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
9236 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
9237 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9238 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9239 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9240 let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
9241 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
9242 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
9244 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
9245 expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, 10_000);
9248 // Note that we use a different PaymentId here to allow us to duplicativly pay
9249 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
9250 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_secret.0)).unwrap();
9251 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9252 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9253 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9254 let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
9255 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
9256 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
9257 // At this point, nodes[1] would notice it has too much value for the payment. It will
9258 // assume the second is a privacy attack (no longer particularly relevant
9259 // post-payment_secrets) and fail back the new HTLC. Previously, it'd also have failed back
9260 // the first HTLC delivered above.
9263 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]);
9264 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
9266 if test_for_second_fail_panic {
9267 // Now we go fail back the first HTLC from the user end.
9268 nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash);
9270 let expected_destinations = vec![
9271 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash },
9272 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash },
9274 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[1], expected_destinations);
9275 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
9277 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9278 let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9279 assert_eq!(fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 2);
9281 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
9282 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
9283 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
9285 let failure_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
9286 assert_eq!(failure_events.len(), 4);
9287 if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[0] {} else { panic!(); }
9288 if let Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = failure_events[1] {} else { panic!(); }
9289 if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[2] {} else { panic!(); }
9290 if let Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = failure_events[3] {} else { panic!(); }
9292 // Let the second HTLC fail and claim the first
9293 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
9294 nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
9296 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9297 let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9298 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
9299 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
9301 expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
9303 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage);
9308 fn test_dup_htlc_second_fail_panic() {
9309 // Previously, if we received two HTLCs back-to-back, where the second overran the expected
9310 // value for the payment, we'd fail back both HTLCs after generating a `PaymentClaimable` event.
9311 // Then, if the user failed the second payment, they'd hit a "tried to fail an already failed
9312 // HTLC" debug panic. This tests for this behavior, checking that only one HTLC is auto-failed.
9313 do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(true);
9317 fn test_dup_htlc_second_rejected() {
9318 // Test that if we receive a second HTLC for an MPP payment that overruns the payment amount we
9319 // simply reject the second HTLC but are still able to claim the first HTLC.
9320 do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(false);
9324 fn test_inconsistent_mpp_params() {
9325 // Test that if we recieve two HTLCs with different payment parameters we fail back the first
9326 // such HTLC and allow the second to stay.
9327 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
9328 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
9329 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
9330 let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9332 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 0);
9333 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 2, 100_000, 0);
9334 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 3, 100_000, 0);
9335 let chan_2_3 =create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, 100_000, 0);
9337 let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
9338 .with_bolt11_features(nodes[3].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
9339 let mut route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, 15_000_000).unwrap();
9340 assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
9341 route.paths.sort_by(|path_a, _| {
9342 // Sort the path so that the path through nodes[1] comes first
9343 if path_a.hops[0].pubkey == nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id() {
9344 core::cmp::Ordering::Less } else { core::cmp::Ordering::Greater }
9347 let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[3]);
9349 let cur_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1;
9350 let payment_id = PaymentId([42; 32]);
9352 let session_privs = {
9353 // We create a fake route here so that we start with three pending HTLCs, which we'll
9354 // ultimately have, just not right away.
9355 let mut dup_route = route.clone();
9356 dup_route.paths.push(route.paths[1].clone());
9357 nodes[0].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(our_payment_hash,
9358 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), payment_id, &dup_route).unwrap()
9360 nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &our_payment_hash,
9361 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), 15_000_000, cur_height, payment_id,
9362 &None, session_privs[0]).unwrap();
9363 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9366 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9367 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9368 pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, our_payment_hash, Some(our_payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), false, None);
9370 assert!(nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
9372 nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[1], &our_payment_hash,
9373 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), 14_000_000, cur_height, payment_id, &None, session_privs[1]).unwrap();
9374 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9377 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9378 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9379 let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
9381 nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
9382 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
9384 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
9385 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
9387 let mut events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9388 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9389 let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
9391 nodes[3].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
9392 check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 0);
9393 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[3], nodes[2], payment_event.commitment_msg, true, true);
9395 // At this point, nodes[3] should notice the two HTLCs don't contain the same total payment
9396 // amount. It will assume the second is a privacy attack (no longer particularly relevant
9397 // post-payment_secrets) and fail back the new HTLC.
9399 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[3]);
9400 nodes[3].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
9401 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[3], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
9402 nodes[3].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
9404 check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
9406 let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[3], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
9407 nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
9408 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[3], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
9410 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }]);
9411 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
9413 let fail_updates_2 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9414 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_2.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
9415 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[2], fail_updates_2.commitment_signed, false);
9417 expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
9419 nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[1], &our_payment_hash,
9420 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), 15_000_000, cur_height, payment_id,
9421 &None, session_privs[2]).unwrap();
9422 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9424 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9425 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9426 pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, our_payment_hash, Some(our_payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), true, None);
9428 do_claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, our_payment_preimage);
9429 expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], our_payment_preimage, Some(None), true, true);
9433 fn test_double_partial_claim() {
9434 // Test what happens if a node receives a payment, generates a PaymentClaimable event, the HTLCs
9435 // time out, the sender resends only some of the MPP parts, then the user processes the
9436 // PaymentClaimable event, ensuring they don't inadvertently claim only part of the full payment
9438 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
9439 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
9440 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
9441 let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9443 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 0);
9444 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 2, 100_000, 0);
9445 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 3, 100_000, 0);
9446 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, 100_000, 0);
9448 let (mut route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[3], 15_000_000);
9449 assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
9450 route.paths.sort_by(|path_a, _| {
9451 // Sort the path so that the path through nodes[1] comes first
9452 if path_a.hops[0].pubkey == nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id() {
9453 core::cmp::Ordering::Less } else { core::cmp::Ordering::Greater }
9456 send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[0], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], 15_000_000, payment_hash, payment_secret);
9457 // nodes[3] has now received a PaymentClaimable event...which it will take some (exorbitant)
9458 // amount of time to respond to.
9460 // Connect some blocks to time out the payment
9461 connect_blocks(&nodes[3], TEST_FINAL_CLTV);
9462 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // To get the same height for sending later
9464 let failed_destinations = vec![
9465 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash },
9466 HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash },
9468 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[3], failed_destinations);
9470 pass_failed_payment_back(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, payment_hash, PaymentFailureReason::RecipientRejected);
9472 // nodes[1] now retries one of the two paths...
9473 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9474 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
9475 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 2);
9477 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9478 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
9479 let node_1_msgs = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
9480 pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), node_1_msgs, false, None);
9482 // At this point nodes[3] has received one half of the payment, and the user goes to handle
9483 // that PaymentClaimable event they got hours ago and never handled...we should refuse to claim.
9484 nodes[3].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
9485 check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 0);
9486 assert!(nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
9489 /// The possible events which may trigger a `max_dust_htlc_exposure` breach
9490 #[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
9491 enum ExposureEvent {
9492 /// Breach occurs at HTLC forwarding (see `send_htlc`)
9494 /// Breach occurs at HTLC reception (see `update_add_htlc`)
9496 /// Breach occurs at outbound update_fee (see `send_update_fee`)
9497 AtUpdateFeeOutbound,
9500 fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_event: ExposureEvent, on_holder_tx: bool, multiplier_dust_limit: bool) {
9501 // Test that we properly reject dust HTLC violating our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`
9504 // At HTLC forward (`send_payment()`), if the sum of the trimmed-to-dust HTLC inbound and
9505 // trimmed-to-dust HTLC outbound balance and this new payment as included on next
9506 // counterparty commitment are above our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`, we'll reject the
9507 // update. At HTLC reception (`update_add_htlc()`), if the sum of the trimmed-to-dust HTLC
9508 // inbound and trimmed-to-dust HTLC outbound balance and this new received HTLC as included
9509 // on next counterparty commitment are above our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`, we'll fail
9510 // the update. Note, we return a `temporary_channel_failure` (0x1000 | 7), as the channel
9511 // might be available again for HTLC processing once the dust bandwidth has cleared up.
9513 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9514 let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
9515 config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure = if multiplier_dust_limit {
9516 // Default test fee estimator rate is 253 sat/kw, so we set the multiplier to 5_000_000 / 253
9517 // to get roughly the same initial value as the default setting when this test was
9518 // originally written.
9519 MaxDustHTLCExposure::FeeRateMultiplier(5_000_000 / 253)
9520 } else { MaxDustHTLCExposure::FixedLimitMsat(5_000_000) }; // initial default setting value
9521 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9522 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config), None]);
9523 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9525 nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 500_000_000, 42, None).unwrap();
9526 let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9527 open_channel.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 50_000_000;
9528 open_channel.max_accepted_htlcs = 60;
9530 open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis = 546;
9532 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel);
9533 let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9534 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel);
9536 let channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
9538 let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 42);
9541 let mut node_0_per_peer_lock;
9542 let mut node_0_peer_state_lock;
9543 let mut chan = get_outbound_v1_channel_ref!(nodes[0], nodes[1], node_0_per_peer_lock, node_0_peer_state_lock, temporary_channel_id);
9544 chan.context.holder_dust_limit_satoshis = 546;
9547 nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
9548 nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
9549 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9550 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9552 nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
9553 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9554 expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9556 let (channel_ready, channel_id) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx);
9557 let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &channel_ready);
9558 update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update);
9560 // Fetch a route in advance as we will be unable to once we're unable to send.
9561 let (mut route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) =
9562 get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000);
9564 let (dust_buffer_feerate, max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat) = {
9565 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
9566 let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
9567 let chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&channel_id).unwrap();
9568 (chan.context.get_dust_buffer_feerate(None) as u64,
9569 chan.context.get_max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator(nodes[0].fee_estimator)))
9571 let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_timeout_tx_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
9572 let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
9574 let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_success_tx_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
9575 let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
9577 let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx: u64 = 4;
9578 let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx;
9581 if dust_outbound_balance {
9582 // Outbound dust threshold: 2223 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + holder's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
9583 // Outbound dust balance: 4372 sats
9584 // Note, we need sent payment to be above outbound dust threshold on counterparty_tx of 2132 sats
9585 for _ in 0..dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx {
9586 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat);
9587 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9588 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
9591 // Inbound dust threshold: 2324 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + holder's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
9592 // Inbound dust balance: 4372 sats
9593 // Note, we need sent payment to be above outbound dust threshold on counterparty_tx of 2031 sats
9594 for _ in 0..dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx {
9595 route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat);
9599 if dust_outbound_balance {
9600 // Outbound dust threshold: 2132 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + counteparty's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
9601 // Outbound dust balance: 5000 sats
9602 for _ in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx - 1 {
9603 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat);
9604 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9605 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
9608 // Inbound dust threshold: 2031 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + counteparty's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
9609 // Inbound dust balance: 5000 sats
9610 for _ in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx - 1 {
9611 route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat);
9616 if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward {
9617 route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat =
9618 if on_holder_tx { dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat + 1 };
9619 // With default dust exposure: 5000 sats
9621 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9622 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)
9623 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
9625 unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9626 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)
9627 ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
9629 } else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception {
9630 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], if on_holder_tx { dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat + 4 });
9631 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9632 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
9633 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9634 let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9635 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9636 let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0));
9637 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
9638 // With default dust exposure: 5000 sats
9640 // Outbound dust balance: 6399 sats
9641 let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1);
9642 let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
9643 nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
9645 // Outbound dust balance: 5200 sats
9646 nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(),
9647 format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx",
9648 dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat * (dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx - 1) + dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat + 4,
9649 max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
9651 } else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound {
9652 route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat = 2_500_000;
9653 // For the multiplier dust exposure limit, since it scales with feerate,
9654 // we need to add a lot of HTLCs that will become dust at the new feerate
9655 // to cross the threshold.
9657 let (_, payment_hash, payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash(&nodes[1], Some(1_000), None);
9658 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9659 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
9662 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
9663 *feerate_lock = *feerate_lock * 10;
9665 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
9666 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9667 nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channel", "Cannot afford to send new feerate at 2530 without infringing max dust htlc exposure", 1);
9670 let _ = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9671 let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
9672 added_monitors.clear();
9675 fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(multiplier_dust_limit: bool) {
9676 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
9677 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
9678 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
9679 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
9680 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
9681 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
9682 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
9683 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
9684 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
9685 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
9686 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
9687 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
9691 fn test_max_dust_htlc_exposure() {
9692 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(false);
9693 do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(true);
9697 fn test_non_final_funding_tx() {
9698 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9699 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9700 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
9701 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9703 let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
9704 let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9705 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
9706 let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9707 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel_message);
9709 let best_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
9711 let chan_id = *nodes[0].network_chan_count.borrow();
9712 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
9713 let input = TxIn { previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint::null(), script_sig: bitcoin::Script::new(), sequence: Sequence(1), witness: Witness::from_vec(vec!(vec!(1))) };
9714 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9715 let mut tx = match events[0] {
9716 Event::FundingGenerationReady { ref channel_value_satoshis, ref output_script, .. } => {
9717 // Timelock the transaction _beyond_ the best client height + 1.
9718 Transaction { version: chan_id as i32, lock_time: PackedLockTime(best_height + 2), input: vec![input], output: vec![TxOut {
9719 value: *channel_value_satoshis, script_pubkey: output_script.clone(),
9722 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
9724 // Transaction should fail as it's evaluated as non-final for propagation.
9725 match nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temp_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()) {
9726 Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => {
9727 assert_eq!(format!("Funding transaction absolute timelock is non-final"), err);
9732 // However, transaction should be accepted if it's in a +1 headroom from best block.
9733 tx.lock_time = PackedLockTime(tx.lock_time.0 - 1);
9734 assert!(nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temp_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).is_ok());
9735 get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9739 fn accept_busted_but_better_fee() {
9740 // If a peer sends us a fee update that is too low, but higher than our previous channel
9741 // feerate, we should accept it. In the future we may want to consider closing the channel
9742 // later, but for now we only accept the update.
9743 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9744 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9745 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
9746 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9748 create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
9750 // Set nodes[1] to expect 5,000 sat/kW.
9752 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
9753 *feerate_lock = 5000;
9756 // If nodes[0] increases their feerate, even if its not enough, nodes[1] should accept it.
9758 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
9759 *feerate_lock = 1000;
9761 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
9762 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9764 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9765 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9767 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
9768 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
9769 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], commitment_signed, false);
9771 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
9774 // If nodes[0] increases their feerate further, even if its not enough, nodes[1] should accept
9777 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
9778 *feerate_lock = 2000;
9780 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
9781 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9783 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9784 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9786 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
9787 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
9788 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], commitment_signed, false);
9790 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
9793 // However, if nodes[0] decreases their feerate, nodes[1] should reject it and close the
9796 let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
9797 *feerate_lock = 1000;
9799 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
9800 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9802 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9803 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9805 MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, .. }, .. } => {
9806 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
9807 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError {
9808 err: "Peer's feerate much too low. Actual: 1000. Our expected lower limit: 5000 (- 250)".to_owned() },
9809 [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
9810 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
9811 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9813 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
9817 fn do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(valid_delta: bool, use_user_hash: bool) {
9818 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9819 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9820 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
9821 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9822 let min_final_cltv_expiry_delta = 120;
9823 let final_cltv_expiry_delta = if valid_delta { min_final_cltv_expiry_delta + 2 } else {
9824 min_final_cltv_expiry_delta - 2 };
9825 let recv_value = 100_000;
9827 create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
9829 let payment_parameters = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), final_cltv_expiry_delta as u32);
9830 let (payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = if use_user_hash {
9831 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[1],
9832 Some(recv_value), Some(min_final_cltv_expiry_delta));
9833 (payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret)
9835 let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(recv_value), 7200, Some(min_final_cltv_expiry_delta)).unwrap();
9836 (payment_hash, nodes[1].node.get_payment_preimage(payment_hash, payment_secret).unwrap(), payment_secret)
9838 let route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_parameters, recv_value).unwrap();
9839 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
9840 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
9841 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
9842 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
9843 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
9844 let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
9845 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
9846 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
9847 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
9850 expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash, payment_secret, recv_value, if use_user_hash {
9851 None } else { Some(payment_preimage) }, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9853 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
9855 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash }]);
9857 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
9859 let fail_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9860 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
9861 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
9863 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, true);
9868 fn test_payment_with_custom_min_cltv_expiry_delta() {
9869 do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(false, false);
9870 do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(false, true);
9871 do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(true, false);
9872 do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(true, true);
9876 fn test_disconnects_peer_awaiting_response_ticks() {
9877 // Tests that nodes which are awaiting on a response critical for channel responsiveness
9878 // disconnect their counterparty after `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
9879 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
9880 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
9881 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
9882 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
9884 // Asserts a disconnect event is queued to the user.
9885 let check_disconnect_event = |node: &Node, should_disconnect: bool| {
9886 let disconnect_event = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().iter().find_map(|event|
9887 if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action, .. } = event {
9888 if let msgs::ErrorAction::DisconnectPeerWithWarning { .. } = action {
9897 assert_eq!(disconnect_event.is_some(), should_disconnect);
9900 // Fires timer ticks ensuring we only attempt to disconnect peers after reaching
9901 // `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
9902 let check_disconnect = |node: &Node| {
9903 // No disconnect without any timer ticks.
9904 check_disconnect_event(node, false);
9906 // No disconnect with 1 timer tick less than required.
9907 for _ in 0..DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS - 1 {
9908 node.node.timer_tick_occurred();
9909 check_disconnect_event(node, false);
9912 // Disconnect after reaching the required ticks.
9913 node.node.timer_tick_occurred();
9914 check_disconnect_event(node, true);
9916 // Disconnect again on the next tick if the peer hasn't been disconnected yet.
9917 node.node.timer_tick_occurred();
9918 check_disconnect_event(node, true);
9921 create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
9923 // We'll start by performing a fee update with Alice (nodes[0]) on the channel.
9924 *nodes[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap() *= 2;
9925 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
9926 check_added_monitors!(&nodes[0], 1);
9927 let alice_fee_update = get_htlc_update_msgs(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9928 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), alice_fee_update.update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
9929 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &alice_fee_update.commitment_signed);
9930 check_added_monitors!(&nodes[1], 1);
9932 // This will prompt Bob (nodes[1]) to respond with his `CommitmentSigned` and `RevokeAndACK`.
9933 let (bob_revoke_and_ack, bob_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(&nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9934 nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_revoke_and_ack);
9935 check_added_monitors!(&nodes[0], 1);
9936 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_commitment_signed);
9937 check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
9939 // Alice then needs to send her final `RevokeAndACK` to complete the commitment dance. We
9940 // pretend Bob hasn't received the message and check whether he'll disconnect Alice after
9941 // reaching `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
9942 let alice_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9943 check_disconnect(&nodes[1]);
9945 // Now, we'll reconnect them to test awaiting a `ChannelReestablish` message.
9947 // Note that since the commitment dance didn't complete above, Alice is expected to resend her
9948 // final `RevokeAndACK` to Bob to complete it.
9949 nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
9950 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9951 let bob_init = msgs::Init {
9952 features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
9954 nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_init, true).unwrap();
9955 let alice_init = msgs::Init {
9956 features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
9958 nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &alice_init, true).unwrap();
9960 // Upon reconnection, Alice sends her `ChannelReestablish` to Bob. Alice, however, hasn't
9961 // received Bob's yet, so she should disconnect him after reaching
9962 // `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
9963 let alice_channel_reestablish = get_event_msg!(
9964 nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()
9966 nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &alice_channel_reestablish);
9967 check_disconnect(&nodes[0]);
9969 // Bob now sends his `ChannelReestablish` to Alice to resume the channel and consider it "live".
9970 let bob_channel_reestablish = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().iter().find_map(|event|
9971 if let MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish { node_id, msg } = event {
9972 assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
9978 nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_channel_reestablish);
9980 // Sanity check that Alice won't disconnect Bob since she's no longer waiting for any messages.
9981 for _ in 0..DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS {
9982 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
9983 check_disconnect_event(&nodes[0], false);
9986 // However, Bob is still waiting on Alice's `RevokeAndACK`, so he should disconnect her after
9987 // reaching `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
9988 check_disconnect(&nodes[1]);
9990 // Finally, have Bob process the last message.
9991 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &alice_revoke_and_ack);
9992 check_added_monitors(&nodes[1], 1);
9994 // At this point, neither node should attempt to disconnect each other, since they aren't
9995 // waiting on any messages.
9996 for node in &nodes {
9997 for _ in 0..DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS {
9998 node.node.timer_tick_occurred();
9999 check_disconnect_event(node, false);
10005 fn test_remove_expired_outbound_unfunded_channels() {
10006 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
10007 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
10008 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
10009 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
10011 let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
10012 let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
10013 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
10014 let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
10015 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel_message);
10017 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
10018 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
10020 Event::FundingGenerationReady { .. } => (),
10021 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
10024 // Asserts the outbound channel has been removed from a nodes[0]'s peer state map.
10025 let check_outbound_channel_existence = |should_exist: bool| {
10026 let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
10027 let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
10028 assert_eq!(chan_lock.outbound_v1_channel_by_id.contains_key(&temp_channel_id), should_exist);
10031 // Channel should exist without any timer ticks.
10032 check_outbound_channel_existence(true);
10034 // Channel should exist with 1 timer tick less than required.
10035 for _ in 0..UNFUNDED_CHANNEL_AGE_LIMIT_TICKS - 1 {
10036 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
10037 check_outbound_channel_existence(true)
10040 // Remove channel after reaching the required ticks.
10041 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
10042 check_outbound_channel_existence(false);
10044 let msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
10045 assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
10046 match msg_events[0] {
10047 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => {
10048 assert_eq!(msg.data, "Force-closing pending channel due to timeout awaiting establishment handshake");
10050 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
10052 check_closed_event(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false, &[nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
10056 fn test_remove_expired_inbound_unfunded_channels() {
10057 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
10058 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
10059 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
10060 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
10062 let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
10063 let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
10064 nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
10065 let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
10066 nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel_message);
10068 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
10069 assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
10071 Event::FundingGenerationReady { .. } => (),
10072 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
10075 // Asserts the inbound channel has been removed from a nodes[1]'s peer state map.
10076 let check_inbound_channel_existence = |should_exist: bool| {
10077 let per_peer_state = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
10078 let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
10079 assert_eq!(chan_lock.inbound_v1_channel_by_id.contains_key(&temp_channel_id), should_exist);
10082 // Channel should exist without any timer ticks.
10083 check_inbound_channel_existence(true);
10085 // Channel should exist with 1 timer tick less than required.
10086 for _ in 0..UNFUNDED_CHANNEL_AGE_LIMIT_TICKS - 1 {
10087 nodes[1].node.timer_tick_occurred();
10088 check_inbound_channel_existence(true)
10091 // Remove channel after reaching the required ticks.
10092 nodes[1].node.timer_tick_occurred();
10093 check_inbound_channel_existence(false);
10095 let msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
10096 assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
10097 match msg_events[0] {
10098 MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => {
10099 assert_eq!(msg.data, "Force-closing pending channel due to timeout awaiting establishment handshake");
10101 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
10103 check_closed_event(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false, &[nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
10106 fn do_test_multi_post_event_actions(do_reload: bool) {
10107 // Tests handling multiple post-Event actions at once.
10108 // There is specific code in ChannelManager to handle channels where multiple post-Event
10109 // `ChannelMonitorUpdates` are pending at once. This test exercises that code.
10111 // Specifically, we test calling `get_and_clear_pending_events` while there are two
10112 // PaymentSents from different channels and one channel has two pending `ChannelMonitorUpdate`s
10113 // - one from an RAA and one from an inbound commitment_signed.
10114 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
10115 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
10116 let (persister, chain_monitor);
10117 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
10118 let nodes_0_deserialized;
10119 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
10121 let chan_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).2;
10122 let chan_id_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2).2;
10124 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000);
10125 send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2]], 1_000_000);
10127 let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000);
10128 let (payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2]], 1_000_000);
10130 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
10131 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
10132 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, 1_000_000);
10134 nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_2);
10135 check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
10136 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], payment_hash_2, 1_000_000);
10138 for dest in &[1, 2] {
10139 let htlc_fulfill_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[*dest], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
10140 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[*dest].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_fulfill_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
10141 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[*dest], htlc_fulfill_updates.commitment_signed, false);
10142 check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 0);
10145 let (route, payment_hash_3, _, payment_secret_3) =
10146 get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 100_000);
10147 let payment_id = PaymentId(payment_hash_3.0);
10148 nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_3,
10149 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_3), payment_id).unwrap();
10150 check_added_monitors(&nodes[1], 1);
10152 let send_event = SendEvent::from_node(&nodes[1]);
10153 nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_event.msgs[0]);
10154 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_event.commitment_msg);
10155 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
10158 let nodes_0_serialized = nodes[0].node.encode();
10159 let chan_0_monitor_serialized = get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id).encode();
10160 let chan_1_monitor_serialized = get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id_2).encode();
10161 reload_node!(nodes[0], test_default_channel_config(), &nodes_0_serialized, &[&chan_0_monitor_serialized, &chan_1_monitor_serialized], persister, chain_monitor, nodes_0_deserialized);
10163 nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
10164 nodes[2].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
10166 reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
10167 reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[2]));
10170 let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
10171 assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
10172 if let Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, .. } = events[0] {
10173 assert!(payment_preimage == our_payment_preimage || payment_preimage == payment_preimage_2);
10174 } else { panic!(); }
10175 if let Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, .. } = events[1] {
10176 assert!(payment_preimage == our_payment_preimage || payment_preimage == payment_preimage_2);
10177 } else { panic!(); }
10178 if let Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } = events[2] {} else { panic!(); }
10179 if let Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } = events[3] {} else { panic!(); }
10181 // After the events are processed, the ChannelMonitorUpdates will be released and, upon their
10182 // completion, we'll respond to nodes[1] with an RAA + CS.
10183 get_revoke_commit_msgs(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
10184 check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 3);
10188 fn test_multi_post_event_actions() {
10189 do_test_multi_post_event_actions(true);
10190 do_test_multi_post_event_actions(false);