1 // This file is Copyright its original authors, visible in version control
4 // This file is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE
5 // or http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
6 // <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your option.
7 // You may not use this file except in accordance with one or both of these
10 //! Further functional tests which test blockchain reorganizations.
13 use crate::chain::keysinterface::{ChannelSigner, EcdsaChannelSigner};
15 use crate::chain::channelmonitor::LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS;
16 use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{ANTI_REORG_DELAY, Balance};
17 use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
18 use crate::chain::chaininterface::LowerBoundedFeeEstimator;
20 use crate::events::bump_transaction::BumpTransactionEvent;
21 use crate::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination};
22 use crate::ln::channel;
24 use crate::ln::chan_utils;
26 use crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager;
27 use crate::ln::channelmanager::{BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, PaymentId, RecipientOnionFields};
28 use crate::ln::msgs::ChannelMessageHandler;
30 use crate::util::config::UserConfig;
32 use crate::util::crypto::sign;
33 use crate::util::ser::Writeable;
34 use crate::util::test_utils;
37 use bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::EcdsaSighashType;
38 use bitcoin::blockdata::script::Builder;
39 use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes;
40 use bitcoin::secp256k1::Secp256k1;
42 use bitcoin::secp256k1::SecretKey;
44 use bitcoin::{Amount, PublicKey, Script, TxIn, TxOut, PackedLockTime, Witness};
45 use bitcoin::Transaction;
47 use bitcoin::util::sighash::SighashCache;
49 use crate::prelude::*;
51 use crate::ln::functional_test_utils::*;
54 fn chanmon_fail_from_stale_commitment() {
55 // If we forward an HTLC to our counterparty, but we force-closed the channel before our
56 // counterparty provides us an updated commitment transaction, we'll end up with a commitment
57 // transaction that does not contain the HTLC which we attempted to forward. In this case, we
58 // need to wait `ANTI_REORG_DELAY` blocks and then fail back the HTLC as there is no way for us
59 // to learn the preimage and the confirmed commitment transaction paid us the value of the
62 // However, previously, we did not do this, ignoring the HTLC entirely.
64 // This could lead to channel closure if the sender we received the HTLC from decides to go on
65 // chain to get their HTLC back before it times out.
67 // Here, we check exactly this case, forwarding a payment from A, through B, to C, before B
68 // broadcasts its latest commitment transaction, which should result in it eventually failing
69 // the HTLC back off-chain to A.
70 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
71 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
72 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
73 let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
75 create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
76 let (update_a, _, chan_id_2, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
78 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 1_000_000);
79 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
80 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
81 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
83 let bs_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_id_2);
85 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
86 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
87 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false);
89 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
90 get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
91 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
93 // Don't bother delivering the new HTLC add/commits, instead confirming the pre-HTLC commitment
94 // transaction for nodes[1].
95 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &bs_txn[0]);
96 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
97 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
98 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
99 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
101 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
102 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_id_2 }]);
103 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
104 let fail_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
106 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
107 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates.commitment_signed, true, true);
108 expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false, update_a.contents.short_channel_id, true);
111 fn test_spendable_output<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, spendable_tx: &Transaction) {
112 let mut spendable = node.chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
113 assert_eq!(spendable.len(), 1);
114 if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs } = spendable.pop().unwrap() {
115 assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1);
116 let spend_tx = node.keys_manager.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outputs[0]], Vec::new(),
117 Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, &Secp256k1::new()).unwrap();
118 check_spends!(spend_tx, spendable_tx);
123 fn revoked_output_htlc_resolution_timing() {
124 // Tests that HTLCs which were present in a broadcasted remote revoked commitment transaction
125 // are resolved only after a spend of the HTLC output reaches six confirmations. Preivously
126 // they would resolve after the revoked commitment transaction itself reaches six
128 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
129 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
130 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
131 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
133 let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 500_000_000);
135 let payment_hash_1 = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000).1;
137 // Get a commitment transaction which contains the HTLC we care about, but which we'll revoke
138 // before forwarding.
139 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
140 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 1);
142 // Route a dust payment to revoke the above commitment transaction
143 route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000);
145 // Confirm the revoked commitment transaction, closing the channel.
146 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
147 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
148 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
149 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
151 let bs_spend_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
152 assert_eq!(bs_spend_txn.len(), 1);
153 check_spends!(bs_spend_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
155 // After the commitment transaction confirms, we should still wait on the HTLC spend
156 // transaction to confirm before resolving the HTLC.
157 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
158 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
159 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
161 // Spend the HTLC output, generating a HTLC failure event after ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
162 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &bs_spend_txn[0]);
163 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
164 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
166 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
167 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, false);
171 fn chanmon_claim_value_coop_close() {
172 // Tests `get_claimable_balances` returns the correct values across a simple cooperative claim.
173 // Specifically, this tests that the channel non-HTLC balances show up in
174 // `get_claimable_balances` until the cooperative claims have confirmed and generated a
175 // `SpendableOutputs` event, and no longer.
176 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
177 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
178 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
179 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
181 let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) =
182 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 1_000_000);
183 let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
184 assert_eq!(funding_outpoint.to_channel_id(), chan_id);
186 let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
187 let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
189 assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
190 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 1_000 - chan_feerate * channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) / 1000
192 nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
193 assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose { claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000, }],
194 nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
196 nodes[0].node.close_channel(&chan_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
197 let node_0_shutdown = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
198 nodes[1].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_0_shutdown);
199 let node_1_shutdown = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
200 nodes[0].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_1_shutdown);
202 let node_0_closing_signed = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendClosingSigned, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
203 nodes[1].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_0_closing_signed);
204 let node_1_closing_signed = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendClosingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
205 nodes[0].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_1_closing_signed);
206 let (_, node_0_2nd_closing_signed) = get_closing_signed_broadcast!(nodes[0].node, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
207 nodes[1].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_0_2nd_closing_signed.unwrap());
208 let (_, node_1_none) = get_closing_signed_broadcast!(nodes[1].node, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
209 assert!(node_1_none.is_none());
211 let shutdown_tx = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
212 assert_eq!(shutdown_tx, nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0));
213 assert_eq!(shutdown_tx.len(), 1);
215 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &shutdown_tx[0]);
216 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &shutdown_tx[0]);
218 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
219 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
221 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
222 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
224 assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
225 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 1_000 - chan_feerate * channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) / 1000,
226 confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
228 nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
229 assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
230 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1000,
231 confirmation_height: nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
233 nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
235 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
236 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
238 assert_eq!(Vec::<Balance>::new(),
239 nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
240 assert_eq!(Vec::<Balance>::new(),
241 nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
243 test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &shutdown_tx[0]);
244 test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &shutdown_tx[0]);
246 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
247 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
250 fn sorted_vec<T: Ord>(mut v: Vec<T>) -> Vec<T> {
255 /// Asserts that `a` and `b` are close, but maybe off by up to 5.
256 /// This is useful when checking fees and weights on transactions as things may vary by a few based
257 /// on signature size and signature size estimation being non-exact.
258 fn fuzzy_assert_eq<V: core::convert::TryInto<u64>>(a: V, b: V) {
259 let a_u64 = a.try_into().map_err(|_| ()).unwrap();
260 let b_u64 = b.try_into().map_err(|_| ()).unwrap();
261 eprintln!("Checking {} and {} for fuzzy equality", a_u64, b_u64);
262 assert!(a_u64 >= b_u64 - 5);
263 assert!(b_u64 >= a_u64 - 5);
266 fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) {
267 // Tests `get_claimable_balances` with an HTLC across a force-close.
268 // We build a channel with an HTLC pending, then force close the channel and check that the
269 // `get_claimable_balances` return value is correct as transactions confirm on-chain.
270 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
271 if prev_commitment_tx {
272 // We broadcast a second-to-latest commitment transaction, without providing the revocation
273 // secret to the counterparty. However, because we always immediately take the revocation
274 // secret from the keys_manager, we would panic at broadcast as we're trying to sign a
275 // transaction which, from the point of view of our keys_manager, is revoked.
276 chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
278 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
279 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
280 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
282 let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) =
283 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 1_000_000);
284 let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
285 assert_eq!(funding_outpoint.to_channel_id(), chan_id);
287 // This HTLC is immediately claimed, giving node B the preimage
288 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000);
289 // This HTLC is allowed to time out, letting A claim it. However, in order to test claimable
290 // balances more fully we also give B the preimage for this HTLC.
291 let (timeout_payment_preimage, timeout_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 4_000_000);
292 // This HTLC will be dust, and not be claimable at all:
293 let (dust_payment_preimage, dust_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000);
295 let htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety
297 let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
298 let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
300 let remote_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_id);
301 let sent_htlc_balance = Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
302 claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
303 claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
305 let sent_htlc_timeout_balance = Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
306 claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
307 claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
309 let received_htlc_balance = Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
310 claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
311 expiry_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
313 let received_htlc_timeout_balance = Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
314 claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
315 expiry_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
317 let received_htlc_claiming_balance = Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
318 claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
319 timeout_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
323 let received_htlc_timeout_claiming_balance = Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
324 claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
325 timeout_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
326 payment_hash: timeout_payment_hash,
327 payment_preimage: timeout_payment_preimage,
330 // Before B receives the payment preimage, it only suggests the push_msat value of 1_000 sats
331 // as claimable. A lists both its to-self balance and the (possibly-claimable) HTLCs.
332 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
333 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 3_000 - 4_000 - 1_000 - 3 - chan_feerate *
334 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
335 }, sent_htlc_balance.clone(), sent_htlc_timeout_balance.clone()]),
336 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
337 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
338 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
339 }, received_htlc_balance.clone(), received_htlc_timeout_balance.clone()]),
340 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
342 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
343 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
344 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 3_000_000);
346 let b_htlc_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(&nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
347 // We claim the dust payment here as well, but it won't impact our claimable balances as its
348 // dust and thus doesn't appear on chain at all.
349 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(dust_payment_preimage);
350 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
351 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], dust_payment_hash, 3_000);
353 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(timeout_payment_preimage);
354 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
355 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], timeout_payment_hash, 4_000_000);
357 if prev_commitment_tx {
358 // To build a previous commitment transaction, deliver one round of commitment messages.
359 nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &b_htlc_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
360 expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
361 nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &b_htlc_msgs.commitment_signed);
362 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
363 let (as_raa, as_cs) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
364 nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
365 let _htlc_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(&nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
366 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
367 nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs);
368 let _bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
369 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
372 // Once B has received the payment preimage, it includes the value of the HTLC in its
373 // "claimable if you were to close the channel" balance.
374 let mut a_expected_balances = vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
375 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - // Channel funding value in satoshis
376 4_000 - // The to-be-failed HTLC value in satoshis
377 3_000 - // The claimed HTLC value in satoshis
378 1_000 - // The push_msat value in satoshis
379 3 - // The dust HTLC value in satoshis
380 // The commitment transaction fee with two HTLC outputs:
381 chan_feerate * (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) +
382 if prev_commitment_tx { 1 } else { 2 } *
383 channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
384 }, sent_htlc_timeout_balance.clone()];
385 if !prev_commitment_tx {
386 a_expected_balances.push(sent_htlc_balance.clone());
388 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(a_expected_balances),
389 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
390 assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
391 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000 + 3_000 + 4_000,
393 nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
395 // Broadcast the closing transaction (which has both pending HTLCs in it) and get B's
396 // broadcasted HTLC claim transaction with preimage.
397 let node_b_commitment_claimable = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32;
398 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &remote_txn[0]);
399 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &remote_txn[0]);
401 let b_broadcast_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
402 assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn.len(), 2);
403 // b_broadcast_txn should spend the HTLCs output of the commitment tx for 3_000 and 4_000 sats
404 check_spends!(b_broadcast_txn[0], remote_txn[0]);
405 check_spends!(b_broadcast_txn[1], remote_txn[0]);
406 assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
407 assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
408 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[b_broadcast_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 3_000);
409 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[b_broadcast_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 4_000);
411 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
412 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
413 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
414 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
415 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
416 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
417 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
418 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
419 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
420 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
422 // Once the commitment transaction confirms, we will wait until ANTI_REORG_DELAY until we
423 // generate any `SpendableOutputs` events. Thus, the same balances will still be listed
424 // available in `get_claimable_balances`. However, both will swap from `ClaimableOnClose` to
425 // other Balance variants, as close has already happened.
426 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
427 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
429 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
430 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 3_000 - 4_000 - 1_000 - 3 - chan_feerate *
431 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
432 confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
433 }, sent_htlc_balance.clone(), sent_htlc_timeout_balance.clone()]),
434 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
435 // The main non-HTLC balance is just awaiting confirmations, but the claimable height is the
436 // CSV delay, not ANTI_REORG_DELAY.
437 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
438 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
439 confirmation_height: node_b_commitment_claimable,
441 // Both HTLC balances are "contentious" as our counterparty could claim them if we wait too
443 received_htlc_claiming_balance.clone(), received_htlc_timeout_claiming_balance.clone()]),
444 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
446 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
447 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], dust_payment_hash, false);
448 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
450 // After ANTI_REORG_DELAY, A will consider its balance fully spendable and generate a
451 // `SpendableOutputs` event. However, B still has to wait for the CSV delay.
452 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![sent_htlc_balance.clone(), sent_htlc_timeout_balance.clone()]),
453 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
454 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
455 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
456 confirmation_height: node_b_commitment_claimable,
457 }, received_htlc_claiming_balance.clone(), received_htlc_timeout_claiming_balance.clone()]),
458 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
460 test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &remote_txn[0]);
461 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
463 // After broadcasting the HTLC claim transaction, node A will still consider the HTLC
464 // possibly-claimable up to ANTI_REORG_DELAY, at which point it will drop it.
465 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &b_broadcast_txn[0]);
466 if prev_commitment_tx {
467 expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
469 expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
471 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![sent_htlc_balance.clone(), sent_htlc_timeout_balance.clone()]),
472 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
473 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
474 assert_eq!(vec![sent_htlc_timeout_balance.clone()],
475 nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
477 // When the HTLC timeout output is spendable in the next block, A should broadcast it
478 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], htlc_cltv_timeout - nodes[0].best_block_info().1 - 1);
479 let a_broadcast_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
480 assert_eq!(a_broadcast_txn.len(), 2);
481 assert_eq!(a_broadcast_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
482 check_spends!(a_broadcast_txn[0], remote_txn[0]);
483 assert_eq!(a_broadcast_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
484 check_spends!(a_broadcast_txn[1], remote_txn[0]);
485 assert_ne!(a_broadcast_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout,
486 a_broadcast_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout);
487 // a_broadcast_txn [0] and [1] should spend the HTLC outputs of the commitment tx
488 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[a_broadcast_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 3_000);
489 assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[a_broadcast_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 4_000);
491 // Once the HTLC-Timeout transaction confirms, A will no longer consider the HTLC
492 // "MaybeClaimable", but instead move it to "AwaitingConfirmations".
493 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &a_broadcast_txn[1]);
494 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
495 assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
496 claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
497 confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
499 nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
500 // After ANTI_REORG_DELAY, A will generate a SpendableOutputs event and drop the claimable
502 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
503 assert_eq!(Vec::<Balance>::new(),
504 nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
505 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], timeout_payment_hash, false);
507 test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &a_broadcast_txn[1]);
509 // Node B will no longer consider the HTLC "contentious" after the HTLC claim transaction
510 // confirms, and consider it simply "awaiting confirmations". Note that it has to wait for the
511 // standard revocable transaction CSV delay before receiving a `SpendableOutputs`.
512 let node_b_htlc_claimable = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32;
513 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &b_broadcast_txn[0]);
515 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
516 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
517 confirmation_height: node_b_commitment_claimable,
518 }, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
519 claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
520 confirmation_height: node_b_htlc_claimable,
521 }, received_htlc_timeout_claiming_balance.clone()]),
522 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
524 // After reaching the commitment output CSV, we'll get a SpendableOutputs event for it and have
525 // only the HTLCs claimable on node B.
526 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_b_commitment_claimable - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
527 test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &remote_txn[0]);
529 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
530 claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
531 confirmation_height: node_b_htlc_claimable,
532 }, received_htlc_timeout_claiming_balance.clone()]),
533 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
535 // After reaching the claimed HTLC output CSV, we'll get a SpendableOutptus event for it and
536 // have only one HTLC output left spendable.
537 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_b_htlc_claimable - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
538 test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &b_broadcast_txn[0]);
540 assert_eq!(vec![received_htlc_timeout_claiming_balance.clone()],
541 nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
543 // Finally, mine the HTLC timeout transaction that A broadcasted (even though B should be able
544 // to claim this HTLC with the preimage it knows!). It will remain listed as a claimable HTLC
545 // until ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations on the spend.
546 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &a_broadcast_txn[1]);
547 assert_eq!(vec![received_htlc_timeout_claiming_balance.clone()],
548 nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
549 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
550 assert_eq!(Vec::<Balance>::new(),
551 nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
553 // Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're
554 // using `ConnectStyle::HighlyRedundantTransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks`, we don't get new
555 // monitor events or claimable balances.
556 for node in nodes.iter() {
557 connect_blocks(node, 6);
558 connect_blocks(node, 6);
559 assert!(node.chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
560 assert!(node.chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
565 fn test_claim_value_force_close() {
566 do_test_claim_value_force_close(true);
567 do_test_claim_value_force_close(false);
571 fn test_balances_on_local_commitment_htlcs() {
572 // Previously, when handling the broadcast of a local commitment transactions (with associated
573 // CSV delays prior to spendability), we incorrectly handled the CSV delays on HTLC
574 // transactions. This caused us to miss spendable outputs for HTLCs which were awaiting a CSV
575 // delay prior to spendability.
577 // Further, because of this, we could hit an assertion as `get_claimable_balances` asserted
578 // that HTLCs were resolved after the funding spend was resolved, which was not true if the
579 // HTLC did not have a CSV delay attached (due to the above bug or due to it being an HTLC
580 // claim by our counterparty).
581 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
582 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
583 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
584 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
586 // Create a single channel with two pending HTLCs from nodes[0] to nodes[1], one which nodes[1]
587 // knows the preimage for, one which it does not.
588 let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 0);
589 let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
591 let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 10_000_000);
592 let htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety
593 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
594 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
595 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
597 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
598 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
599 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false);
601 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
602 expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash, payment_secret, 10_000_000);
604 let (route_2, payment_hash_2, payment_preimage_2, payment_secret_2) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 20_000_000);
605 nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_2, payment_hash_2,
606 RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_2), PaymentId(payment_hash_2.0)).unwrap();
607 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
609 let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
610 nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
611 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false);
613 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
614 expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 20_000_000);
615 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_2);
616 get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
617 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
618 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, 20_000_000);
620 let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
621 let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
623 // Get nodes[0]'s commitment transaction and HTLC-Timeout transactions
624 let as_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_id);
625 assert_eq!(as_txn.len(), 3);
626 check_spends!(as_txn[1], as_txn[0]);
627 check_spends!(as_txn[2], as_txn[0]);
628 check_spends!(as_txn[0], funding_tx);
630 // First confirm the commitment transaction on nodes[0], which should leave us with three
631 // claimable balances.
632 let node_a_commitment_claimable = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32;
633 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_txn[0]);
634 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
635 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
636 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
638 let htlc_balance_known_preimage = Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
639 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
640 claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
642 let htlc_balance_unknown_preimage = Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
643 claimable_amount_satoshis: 20_000,
644 claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
647 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
648 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
649 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
650 confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
651 }, htlc_balance_known_preimage.clone(), htlc_balance_unknown_preimage.clone()]),
652 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
654 // Get nodes[1]'s HTLC claim tx for the second HTLC
655 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &as_txn[0]);
656 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
657 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
658 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
659 let bs_htlc_claim_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
660 assert_eq!(bs_htlc_claim_txn.len(), 1);
661 check_spends!(bs_htlc_claim_txn[0], as_txn[0]);
663 // Connect blocks until the HTLCs expire, allowing us to (validly) broadcast the HTLC-Timeout
665 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 1);
666 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
667 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
668 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
669 confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
670 }, htlc_balance_known_preimage.clone(), htlc_balance_unknown_preimage.clone()]),
671 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
672 assert_eq!(as_txn[1].lock_time.0, nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1); // as_txn[1] can be included in the next block
674 // Now confirm nodes[0]'s HTLC-Timeout transaction, which changes the claimable balance to an
675 // "awaiting confirmations" one.
676 let node_a_htlc_claimable = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32;
677 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_txn[1]);
678 // Note that prior to the fix in the commit which introduced this test, this (and the next
679 // balance) check failed. With this check removed, the code panicked in the `connect_blocks`
680 // call, as described, two hunks down.
681 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
682 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
683 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
684 confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
685 }, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
686 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
687 confirmation_height: node_a_htlc_claimable,
688 }, htlc_balance_unknown_preimage.clone()]),
689 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
691 // Now confirm nodes[1]'s HTLC claim, giving nodes[0] the preimage. Note that the "maybe
692 // claimable" balance remains until we see ANTI_REORG_DELAY blocks.
693 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &bs_htlc_claim_txn[0]);
694 expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_2);
695 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
696 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
697 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
698 confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
699 }, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
700 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
701 confirmation_height: node_a_htlc_claimable,
702 }, htlc_balance_unknown_preimage.clone()]),
703 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
705 // Finally make the HTLC transactions have ANTI_REORG_DELAY blocks. This call previously
706 // panicked as described in the test introduction. This will remove the "maybe claimable"
707 // spendable output as nodes[1] has fully claimed the second HTLC.
708 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
709 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false);
711 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
712 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
713 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
714 confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
715 }, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
716 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
717 confirmation_height: node_a_htlc_claimable,
719 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
721 // Connect blocks until the commitment transaction's CSV expires, providing us the relevant
722 // `SpendableOutputs` event and removing the claimable balance entry.
723 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_a_commitment_claimable - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
724 assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
725 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
726 confirmation_height: node_a_htlc_claimable,
728 nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
729 test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_txn[0]);
731 // Connect blocks until the HTLC-Timeout's CSV expires, providing us the relevant
732 // `SpendableOutputs` event and removing the claimable balance entry.
733 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_a_htlc_claimable - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
734 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
735 test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_txn[1]);
737 // Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're
738 // using `ConnectStyle::HighlyRedundantTransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks`, we don't get new
739 // monitor events or claimable balances.
740 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 6);
741 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 6);
742 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
743 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
747 fn test_no_preimage_inbound_htlc_balances() {
748 // Tests that MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC are generated for inbound HTLCs for which we do not
750 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
751 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
752 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
753 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
755 let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 500_000_000);
756 let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
758 // Send two HTLCs, one from A to B, and one from B to A.
759 let to_b_failed_payment_hash = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 10_000_000).1;
760 let to_a_failed_payment_hash = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 20_000_000).1;
761 let htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety
763 let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
764 let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
766 let a_sent_htlc_balance = Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
767 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
768 claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
770 let a_received_htlc_balance = Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
771 claimable_amount_satoshis: 20_000,
772 expiry_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
774 let b_received_htlc_balance = Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
775 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
776 expiry_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
778 let b_sent_htlc_balance = Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
779 claimable_amount_satoshis: 20_000,
780 claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
783 // Both A and B will have an HTLC that's claimable on timeout and one that's claimable if they
784 // receive the preimage. These will remain the same through the channel closure and until the
785 // HTLC output is spent.
787 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
788 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
789 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
790 }, a_received_htlc_balance.clone(), a_sent_htlc_balance.clone()]),
791 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
793 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
794 claimable_amount_satoshis: 500_000 - 20_000,
795 }, b_received_htlc_balance.clone(), b_sent_htlc_balance.clone()]),
796 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
798 // Get nodes[0]'s commitment transaction and HTLC-Timeout transaction
799 let as_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_id);
800 assert_eq!(as_txn.len(), 2);
801 check_spends!(as_txn[1], as_txn[0]);
802 check_spends!(as_txn[0], funding_tx);
804 // Now close the channel by confirming A's commitment transaction on both nodes, checking the
805 // claimable balances remain the same except for the non-HTLC balance changing variant.
806 let node_a_commitment_claimable = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32;
807 let as_pre_spend_claims = sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
808 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
809 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
810 confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
811 }, a_received_htlc_balance.clone(), a_sent_htlc_balance.clone()]);
813 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_txn[0]);
814 nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clear();
815 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
816 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
817 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
819 assert_eq!(as_pre_spend_claims,
820 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
822 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &as_txn[0]);
823 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
824 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
825 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
827 let node_b_commitment_claimable = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1;
828 let mut bs_pre_spend_claims = sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
829 claimable_amount_satoshis: 500_000 - 20_000,
830 confirmation_height: node_b_commitment_claimable,
831 }, b_received_htlc_balance.clone(), b_sent_htlc_balance.clone()]);
832 assert_eq!(bs_pre_spend_claims,
833 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
835 // We'll broadcast the HTLC-Timeout transaction one block prior to the htlc's expiration (as it
836 // is confirmable in the next block), but will still include the same claimable balances as no
837 // HTLC has been spent, even after the HTLC expires. We'll also fail the inbound HTLC, but it
838 // won't do anything as the channel is already closed.
840 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 1);
841 let as_htlc_timeout_claim = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
842 assert_eq!(as_htlc_timeout_claim.len(), 1);
843 check_spends!(as_htlc_timeout_claim[0], as_txn[0]);
844 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions!(nodes[0],
845 [HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: to_a_failed_payment_hash }]);
847 assert_eq!(as_pre_spend_claims,
848 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
850 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1);
851 assert_eq!(as_pre_spend_claims,
852 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
854 // For node B, we'll get the non-HTLC funds claimable after ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations
855 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
856 test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &as_txn[0]);
857 bs_pre_spend_claims.retain(|e| if let Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { .. } = e { false } else { true });
859 // The next few blocks for B look the same as for A, though for the opposite HTLC
860 nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clear();
861 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - (ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1) - 1);
862 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions!(nodes[1],
863 [HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: to_b_failed_payment_hash }]);
864 let bs_htlc_timeout_claim = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
865 assert_eq!(bs_htlc_timeout_claim.len(), 1);
866 check_spends!(bs_htlc_timeout_claim[0], as_txn[0]);
868 assert_eq!(bs_pre_spend_claims,
869 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
871 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
872 assert_eq!(bs_pre_spend_claims,
873 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
875 // Now confirm the two HTLC timeout transactions for A, checking that the inbound HTLC resolves
876 // after ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations and the other takes BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT confirmations.
877 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_htlc_timeout_claim[0]);
878 let as_timeout_claimable_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + (BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32) - 1;
879 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
880 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
881 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
882 confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
883 }, a_received_htlc_balance.clone(), Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
884 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
885 confirmation_height: as_timeout_claimable_height,
887 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
889 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &bs_htlc_timeout_claim[0]);
890 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
891 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
892 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
893 confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
894 }, a_received_htlc_balance.clone(), Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
895 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
896 confirmation_height: as_timeout_claimable_height,
898 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
900 // Once as_htlc_timeout_claim[0] reaches ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations, we should get a
901 // payment failure event.
902 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 2);
903 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], to_b_failed_payment_hash, false);
905 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1);
906 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
907 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
908 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
909 confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
910 }, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
911 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
912 confirmation_height: core::cmp::max(as_timeout_claimable_height, htlc_cltv_timeout),
914 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
916 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_a_commitment_claimable - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
917 assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
918 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
919 confirmation_height: core::cmp::max(as_timeout_claimable_height, htlc_cltv_timeout),
921 nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
922 test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_txn[0]);
924 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], as_timeout_claimable_height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
925 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
926 test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_htlc_timeout_claim[0]);
928 // The process for B should be completely identical as well, noting that the non-HTLC-balance
929 // was already claimed.
930 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &bs_htlc_timeout_claim[0]);
931 let bs_timeout_claimable_height = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1;
932 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![b_received_htlc_balance.clone(), Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
933 claimable_amount_satoshis: 20_000,
934 confirmation_height: bs_timeout_claimable_height,
936 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
938 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &as_htlc_timeout_claim[0]);
939 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![b_received_htlc_balance.clone(), Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
940 claimable_amount_satoshis: 20_000,
941 confirmation_height: bs_timeout_claimable_height,
943 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
945 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 2);
946 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], to_a_failed_payment_hash, false);
948 assert_eq!(vec![b_received_htlc_balance.clone()],
949 nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
950 test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &bs_htlc_timeout_claim[0]);
952 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
953 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
955 // Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're
956 // using `ConnectStyle::HighlyRedundantTransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks`, we don't get new
957 // monitor events or claimable balances.
958 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 6);
959 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 6);
960 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
961 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
964 fn sorted_vec_with_additions<T: Ord + Clone>(v_orig: &Vec<T>, extra_ts: &[&T]) -> Vec<T> {
965 let mut v = v_orig.clone();
967 v.push((*t).clone());
973 fn do_test_revoked_counterparty_commitment_balances(confirm_htlc_spend_first: bool) {
974 // Tests `get_claimable_balances` for revoked counterparty commitment transactions.
975 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
976 // We broadcast a second-to-latest commitment transaction, without providing the revocation
977 // secret to the counterparty. However, because we always immediately take the revocation
978 // secret from the keys_manager, we would panic at broadcast as we're trying to sign a
979 // transaction which, from the point of view of our keys_manager, is revoked.
980 chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
981 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
982 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
983 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
985 let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) =
986 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 100_000_000);
987 let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
988 assert_eq!(funding_outpoint.to_channel_id(), chan_id);
990 // We create five HTLCs for B to claim against A's revoked commitment transaction:
992 // (1) one for which A is the originator and B knows the preimage
993 // (2) one for which B is the originator where the HTLC has since timed-out
994 // (3) one for which B is the originator but where the HTLC has not yet timed-out
995 // (4) one dust HTLC which is lost in the channel closure
996 // (5) one that actually isn't in the revoked commitment transaction at all, but was added in
997 // later commitment transaction updates
999 // Though they could all be claimed in a single claim transaction, due to CLTV timeouts they
1000 // are all currently claimed in separate transactions, which helps us test as we can claim
1001 // HTLCs individually.
1003 let (claimed_payment_preimage, claimed_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000);
1004 let timeout_payment_hash = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 4_000_000).1;
1005 let dust_payment_hash = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000).1;
1007 let htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety
1009 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 10);
1010 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 10);
1012 let live_htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety
1013 let live_payment_hash = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 5_000_000).1;
1015 // Get the latest commitment transaction from A and then update the fee to revoke it
1016 let as_revoked_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_id);
1017 let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
1019 let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
1021 let missing_htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety
1022 let missing_htlc_payment_hash = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 2_000_000).1;
1024 nodes[1].node.claim_funds(claimed_payment_preimage);
1025 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], claimed_payment_hash, 3_000_000);
1026 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1027 let _b_htlc_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(&nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
1029 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], htlc_cltv_timeout + 1 - 10);
1030 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
1031 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1033 let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
1034 assert_eq!(events.len(), 6);
1035 let mut failed_payments: HashSet<_> =
1036 [timeout_payment_hash, dust_payment_hash, live_payment_hash, missing_htlc_payment_hash]
1037 .iter().map(|a| *a).collect();
1038 events.retain(|ev| {
1040 Event::HTLCHandlingFailed { failed_next_destination: HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id, channel_id }, .. } => {
1041 assert_eq!(*channel_id, chan_id);
1042 assert_eq!(*node_id, Some(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
1045 Event::HTLCHandlingFailed { failed_next_destination: HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash }, .. } => {
1046 assert!(failed_payments.remove(payment_hash));
1052 assert!(failed_payments.is_empty());
1053 if let Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } = events[0] {} else { panic!(); }
1055 Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {},
1059 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], htlc_cltv_timeout + 1 - 10);
1060 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
1061 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1062 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
1064 // Prior to channel closure, B considers the preimage HTLC as its own, and otherwise only
1065 // lists the two on-chain timeout-able HTLCs as claimable balances.
1066 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
1067 claimable_amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 5_000 - 4_000 - 3 - 2_000 + 3_000,
1068 }, Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
1069 claimable_amount_satoshis: 2_000,
1070 claimable_height: missing_htlc_cltv_timeout,
1071 }, Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
1072 claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
1073 claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
1074 }, Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
1075 claimable_amount_satoshis: 5_000,
1076 claimable_height: live_htlc_cltv_timeout,
1078 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1080 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &as_revoked_txn[0]);
1081 let mut claim_txn: Vec<_> = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().drain(..).filter(|tx| tx.input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.txid == as_revoked_txn[0].txid())).collect();
1082 // Currently the revoked commitment is claimed in four transactions as the HTLCs all expire
1084 assert_eq!(claim_txn.len(), 4);
1085 claim_txn.sort_unstable_by_key(|tx| tx.output.iter().map(|output| output.value).sum::<u64>());
1087 // The following constants were determined experimentally
1088 const BS_TO_SELF_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT: usize = 483;
1089 const OUTBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT: usize = 571;
1090 const INBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT: usize = 578;
1092 // Check that the weight is close to the expected weight. Note that signature sizes vary
1093 // somewhat so it may not always be exact.
1094 fuzzy_assert_eq(claim_txn[0].weight(), OUTBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT);
1095 fuzzy_assert_eq(claim_txn[1].weight(), INBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT);
1096 fuzzy_assert_eq(claim_txn[2].weight(), INBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT);
1097 fuzzy_assert_eq(claim_txn[3].weight(), BS_TO_SELF_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT);
1099 // The expected balance for the next three checks, with the largest-HTLC and to_self output
1100 // claim balances separated out.
1101 let expected_balance = vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1102 // to_remote output in A's revoked commitment
1103 claimable_amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 5_000 - 4_000 - 3,
1104 confirmation_height: nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + 5,
1105 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1106 claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
1107 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1108 claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
1111 let to_self_unclaimed_balance = Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1112 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
1113 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 3 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
1115 let to_self_claimed_avail_height;
1116 let largest_htlc_unclaimed_balance = Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1117 claimable_amount_satoshis: 5_000,
1119 let largest_htlc_claimed_avail_height;
1121 // Once the channel has been closed by A, B now considers all of the commitment transactions'
1122 // outputs as `CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable`.
1123 assert_eq!(sorted_vec_with_additions(&expected_balance, &[&to_self_unclaimed_balance, &largest_htlc_unclaimed_balance]),
1124 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1126 if confirm_htlc_spend_first {
1127 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[2]);
1128 largest_htlc_claimed_avail_height = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + 5;
1129 to_self_claimed_avail_height = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + 6; // will be claimed in the next block
1131 // Connect the to_self output claim, taking all of A's non-HTLC funds
1132 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[3]);
1133 to_self_claimed_avail_height = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + 5;
1134 largest_htlc_claimed_avail_height = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + 6; // will be claimed in the next block
1137 let largest_htlc_claimed_balance = Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1138 claimable_amount_satoshis: 5_000 - chan_feerate * INBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT as u64 / 1000,
1139 confirmation_height: largest_htlc_claimed_avail_height,
1141 let to_self_claimed_balance = Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1142 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
1143 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 3 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000
1144 - chan_feerate * claim_txn[3].weight() as u64 / 1000,
1145 confirmation_height: to_self_claimed_avail_height,
1148 if confirm_htlc_spend_first {
1149 assert_eq!(sorted_vec_with_additions(&expected_balance, &[&to_self_unclaimed_balance, &largest_htlc_claimed_balance]),
1150 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1152 assert_eq!(sorted_vec_with_additions(&expected_balance, &[&to_self_claimed_balance, &largest_htlc_unclaimed_balance]),
1153 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1156 if confirm_htlc_spend_first {
1157 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[3]);
1159 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[2]);
1161 assert_eq!(sorted_vec_with_additions(&expected_balance, &[&to_self_claimed_balance, &largest_htlc_claimed_balance]),
1162 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1164 // Finally, connect the last two remaining HTLC spends and check that they move to
1165 // `ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations`
1166 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[0]);
1167 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[1]);
1169 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1170 // to_remote output in A's revoked commitment
1171 claimable_amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 5_000 - 4_000 - 3,
1172 confirmation_height: nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + 1,
1173 }, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1174 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
1175 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 3 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000
1176 - chan_feerate * claim_txn[3].weight() as u64 / 1000,
1177 confirmation_height: to_self_claimed_avail_height,
1178 }, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1179 claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000 - chan_feerate * OUTBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT as u64 / 1000,
1180 confirmation_height: nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + 4,
1181 }, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1182 claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000 - chan_feerate * INBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT as u64 / 1000,
1183 confirmation_height: nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + 5,
1184 }, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1185 claimable_amount_satoshis: 5_000 - chan_feerate * INBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT as u64 / 1000,
1186 confirmation_height: largest_htlc_claimed_avail_height,
1188 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1190 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
1191 test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &as_revoked_txn[0]);
1193 let mut payment_failed_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
1194 expect_payment_failed_conditions_event(payment_failed_events[..2].to_vec(),
1195 missing_htlc_payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
1196 expect_payment_failed_conditions_event(payment_failed_events[2..].to_vec(),
1197 dust_payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
1199 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
1200 test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[if confirm_htlc_spend_first { 2 } else { 3 }]);
1201 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
1202 test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[if confirm_htlc_spend_first { 3 } else { 2 }]);
1203 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], live_payment_hash, false);
1204 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
1205 test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[0]);
1206 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
1207 test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[1]);
1208 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], timeout_payment_hash, false);
1209 assert_eq!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances(), Vec::new());
1211 // Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're
1212 // using `ConnectStyle::HighlyRedundantTransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks`, we don't get new
1213 // monitor events or claimable balances.
1214 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 6);
1215 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 6);
1216 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
1217 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
1221 fn test_revoked_counterparty_commitment_balances() {
1222 do_test_revoked_counterparty_commitment_balances(true);
1223 do_test_revoked_counterparty_commitment_balances(false);
1227 fn test_revoked_counterparty_htlc_tx_balances() {
1228 // Tests `get_claimable_balances` for revocation spends of HTLC transactions.
1229 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1230 chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
1231 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1232 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1233 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1235 // Create some initial channels
1236 let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) =
1237 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 11_000_000);
1238 let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
1239 assert_eq!(funding_outpoint.to_channel_id(), chan_id);
1241 let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
1242 let failed_payment_hash = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000).1;
1243 let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_id);
1244 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
1245 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, funding_tx.txid());
1247 // The to-be-revoked commitment tx should have two HTLCs and an output for both sides
1248 assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 4);
1250 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage);
1252 let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
1253 let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
1255 // B will generate an HTLC-Success from its revoked commitment tx
1256 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
1257 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
1258 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1259 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
1260 let revoked_htlc_success = {
1261 let mut txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
1262 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1);
1263 assert_eq!(txn[0].input.len(), 1);
1264 assert_eq!(txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
1265 check_spends!(txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
1269 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV);
1270 let revoked_htlc_timeout = {
1271 let mut txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.unique_txn_broadcast();
1272 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 2);
1273 if txn[0].input[0].previous_output == revoked_htlc_success.input[0].previous_output {
1279 check_spends!(revoked_htlc_timeout, revoked_local_txn[0]);
1280 assert_ne!(revoked_htlc_success.input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_timeout.input[0].previous_output);
1281 assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_success.lock_time.0, 0);
1282 assert_ne!(revoked_htlc_timeout.lock_time.0, 0);
1284 // A will generate justice tx from B's revoked commitment/HTLC tx
1285 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
1286 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
1287 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1288 check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
1289 let to_remote_conf_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1;
1291 let as_commitment_claim_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
1292 assert_eq!(as_commitment_claim_txn.len(), 1);
1293 check_spends!(as_commitment_claim_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
1295 // The next two checks have the same balance set for A - even though we confirm a revoked HTLC
1296 // transaction our balance tracking doesn't use the on-chain value so the
1297 // `CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable` entry doesn't change.
1298 let as_balances = sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1299 // to_remote output in B's revoked commitment
1300 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 11_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
1301 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
1302 confirmation_height: to_remote_conf_height,
1303 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1304 // to_self output in B's revoked commitment
1305 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
1306 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
1307 claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
1308 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
1309 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
1311 assert_eq!(as_balances,
1312 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1314 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_htlc_success);
1315 let as_htlc_claim_tx = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
1316 assert_eq!(as_htlc_claim_tx.len(), 2);
1317 check_spends!(as_htlc_claim_tx[0], revoked_htlc_success);
1318 check_spends!(as_htlc_claim_tx[1], revoked_local_txn[0]); // A has to generate a new claim for the remaining revoked
1319 // outputs (which no longer includes the spent HTLC output)
1321 assert_eq!(as_balances,
1322 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1324 assert_eq!(as_htlc_claim_tx[0].output.len(), 1);
1325 fuzzy_assert_eq(as_htlc_claim_tx[0].output[0].value,
1326 3_000 - chan_feerate * (revoked_htlc_success.weight() + as_htlc_claim_tx[0].weight()) as u64 / 1000);
1328 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_htlc_claim_tx[0]);
1329 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1330 // to_remote output in B's revoked commitment
1331 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 11_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
1332 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
1333 confirmation_height: to_remote_conf_height,
1334 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1335 // to_self output in B's revoked commitment
1336 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
1337 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
1338 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
1339 }, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1340 claimable_amount_satoshis: as_htlc_claim_tx[0].output[0].value,
1341 confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
1343 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1345 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 3);
1346 test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
1347 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1348 // to_self output to B
1349 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
1350 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
1351 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
1352 }, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1353 claimable_amount_satoshis: as_htlc_claim_tx[0].output[0].value,
1354 confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 2,
1356 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1358 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 2);
1359 test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_htlc_claim_tx[0]);
1360 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1361 // to_self output in B's revoked commitment
1362 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
1363 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
1364 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
1366 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1368 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], revoked_htlc_timeout.lock_time.0 - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
1369 expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(&nodes[0],
1370 [HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: failed_payment_hash }]);
1371 // As time goes on A may split its revocation claim transaction into multiple.
1372 let as_fewer_input_rbf = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
1373 for tx in as_fewer_input_rbf.iter() {
1374 check_spends!(tx, revoked_local_txn[0]);
1377 // Connect a number of additional blocks to ensure we don't forget the HTLC output needs
1379 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
1380 let as_fewer_input_rbf = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
1381 for tx in as_fewer_input_rbf.iter() {
1382 check_spends!(tx, revoked_local_txn[0]);
1385 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_htlc_timeout);
1386 let as_second_htlc_claim_tx = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
1387 assert_eq!(as_second_htlc_claim_tx.len(), 2);
1389 check_spends!(as_second_htlc_claim_tx[0], revoked_htlc_timeout);
1390 check_spends!(as_second_htlc_claim_tx[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
1392 // Connect blocks to finalize the HTLC resolution with the HTLC-Timeout transaction. In a
1393 // previous iteration of the revoked balance handling this would result in us "forgetting" that
1394 // the revoked HTLC output still needed to be claimed.
1395 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
1396 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1397 // to_self output in B's revoked commitment
1398 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
1399 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
1400 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
1402 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1404 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_second_htlc_claim_tx[0]);
1405 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1406 // to_self output in B's revoked commitment
1407 claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
1408 }, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1409 claimable_amount_satoshis: as_second_htlc_claim_tx[0].output[0].value,
1410 confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
1412 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1414 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_second_htlc_claim_tx[1]);
1415 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1416 // to_self output in B's revoked commitment
1417 claimable_amount_satoshis: as_second_htlc_claim_tx[1].output[0].value,
1418 confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
1419 }, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1420 claimable_amount_satoshis: as_second_htlc_claim_tx[0].output[0].value,
1421 confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 2,
1423 sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1425 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 2);
1426 test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_second_htlc_claim_tx[0]);
1427 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1);
1428 test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_second_htlc_claim_tx[1]);
1430 assert_eq!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances(), Vec::new());
1432 // Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're
1433 // using `ConnectStyle::HighlyRedundantTransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks`, we don't get new
1434 // monitor events or claimable balances.
1435 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 6);
1436 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 6);
1437 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
1438 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
1442 fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() {
1443 // Tests `get_claimable_balances` for revoked counterparty commitment transactions when
1444 // claiming with an aggregated claim transaction.
1445 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1446 // We broadcast a second-to-latest commitment transaction, without providing the revocation
1447 // secret to the counterparty. However, because we always immediately take the revocation
1448 // secret from the keys_manager, we would panic at broadcast as we're trying to sign a
1449 // transaction which, from the point of view of our keys_manager, is revoked.
1450 chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
1451 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1452 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1453 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1455 let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) =
1456 create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 100_000_000);
1457 let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
1458 assert_eq!(funding_outpoint.to_channel_id(), chan_id);
1460 // We create two HTLCs, one which we will give A the preimage to to generate an HTLC-Success
1461 // transaction, and one which we will not, allowing B to claim the HTLC output in an aggregated
1462 // revocation-claim transaction.
1464 let (claimed_payment_preimage, claimed_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
1465 let revoked_payment_hash = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 4_000_000).1;
1467 let htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety
1469 // Cheat by giving A's ChannelMonitor the preimage to the to-be-claimed HTLC so that we have an
1470 // HTLC-claim transaction on the to-be-revoked state.
1471 get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id).provide_payment_preimage(&claimed_payment_hash, &claimed_payment_preimage,
1472 &node_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(node_cfgs[0].fee_estimator), &nodes[0].logger);
1474 // Now get the latest commitment transaction from A and then update the fee to revoke it
1475 let as_revoked_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_id);
1477 assert_eq!(as_revoked_txn.len(), 2);
1478 check_spends!(as_revoked_txn[0], funding_tx);
1479 check_spends!(as_revoked_txn[1], as_revoked_txn[0]); // The HTLC-Claim transaction
1481 let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
1482 let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
1485 let mut feerate = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
1488 nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
1489 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1491 let fee_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1492 nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &fee_update.update_fee.unwrap());
1493 commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], fee_update.commitment_signed, false);
1495 nodes[0].node.claim_funds(claimed_payment_preimage);
1496 expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[0], claimed_payment_hash, 3_000_000);
1497 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1498 let _a_htlc_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(&nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1500 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
1501 claimable_amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 4_000 - 3_000,
1502 }, Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
1503 claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
1504 claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
1505 }, Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
1506 claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
1507 claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
1509 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1511 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &as_revoked_txn[0]);
1512 check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
1513 check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
1514 check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1516 let mut claim_txn: Vec<_> = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().drain(..).filter(|tx| tx.input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.txid == as_revoked_txn[0].txid())).collect();
1517 // Currently the revoked commitment outputs are all claimed in one aggregated transaction
1518 assert_eq!(claim_txn.len(), 1);
1519 assert_eq!(claim_txn[0].input.len(), 3);
1520 check_spends!(claim_txn[0], as_revoked_txn[0]);
1522 let to_remote_maturity = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1;
1524 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1525 // to_remote output in A's revoked commitment
1526 claimable_amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 4_000 - 3_000,
1527 confirmation_height: to_remote_maturity,
1528 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1529 // to_self output in A's revoked commitment
1530 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
1531 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
1532 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
1533 claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
1534 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
1535 claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
1537 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1539 // Confirm A's HTLC-Success tranasction which presumably raced B's claim, causing B to create a
1541 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &as_revoked_txn[1]);
1542 expect_payment_sent!(nodes[1], claimed_payment_preimage);
1543 let mut claim_txn_2: Vec<_> = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
1544 claim_txn_2.sort_unstable_by_key(|tx| if tx.input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.txid == as_revoked_txn[0].txid()) { 0 } else { 1 });
1545 // Once B sees the HTLC-Success transaction it splits its claim transaction into two, though in
1546 // theory it could re-aggregate the claims as well.
1547 assert_eq!(claim_txn_2.len(), 2);
1548 assert_eq!(claim_txn_2[0].input.len(), 2);
1549 check_spends!(claim_txn_2[0], as_revoked_txn[0]);
1550 assert_eq!(claim_txn_2[1].input.len(), 1);
1551 check_spends!(claim_txn_2[1], as_revoked_txn[1]);
1553 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1554 // to_remote output in A's revoked commitment
1555 claimable_amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 4_000 - 3_000,
1556 confirmation_height: to_remote_maturity,
1557 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1558 // to_self output in A's revoked commitment
1559 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
1560 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
1561 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
1562 claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
1563 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
1564 // The amount here is a bit of a misnomer, really its been reduced by the HTLC
1565 // transaction fee, but the claimable amount is always a bit of an overshoot for HTLCs
1566 // anyway, so its not a big change.
1567 claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
1569 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1571 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 5);
1572 test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &as_revoked_txn[0]);
1574 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1575 // to_self output in A's revoked commitment
1576 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
1577 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
1578 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
1579 claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
1580 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
1581 // The amount here is a bit of a misnomer, really its been reduced by the HTLC
1582 // transaction fee, but the claimable amount is always a bit of an overshoot for HTLCs
1583 // anyway, so its not a big change.
1584 claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
1586 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1588 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[1]);
1589 let htlc_2_claim_maturity = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1;
1591 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1592 // to_self output in A's revoked commitment
1593 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
1594 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
1595 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
1596 claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
1597 }, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { // HTLC 2
1598 claimable_amount_satoshis: claim_txn_2[1].output[0].value,
1599 confirmation_height: htlc_2_claim_maturity,
1601 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1603 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 5);
1604 test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[1]);
1606 assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
1607 // to_self output in A's revoked commitment
1608 claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
1609 (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
1610 }, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
1611 claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
1613 sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
1615 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[0]);
1616 let rest_claim_maturity = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1;
1618 assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
1619 claimable_amount_satoshis: claim_txn_2[0].output[0].value,
1620 confirmation_height: rest_claim_maturity,
1622 nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
1624 assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); // We shouldn't fail the payment until we spend the output
1626 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 5);
1627 expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], revoked_payment_hash, false);
1628 test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[0]);
1629 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
1631 // Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're
1632 // using `ConnectStyle::HighlyRedundantTransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks`, we don't get new
1633 // monitor events or claimable balances.
1634 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 6);
1635 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 6);
1636 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
1637 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
1640 fn do_test_restored_packages_retry(check_old_monitor_retries_after_upgrade: bool) {
1641 // Tests that we'll retry packages that were previously timelocked after we've restored them.
1643 let new_chain_monitor;
1644 let node_deserialized;
1646 let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1647 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1648 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1649 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1651 // Open a channel, lock in an HTLC, and immediately broadcast the commitment transaction. This
1652 // ensures that the HTLC timeout package is held until we reach its expiration height.
1653 let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 50_000_000);
1654 route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 10_000_000);
1656 nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
1657 check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
1658 check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[0], 1, true);
1659 check_closed_event(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false);
1661 let commitment_tx = {
1662 let mut txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
1663 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1);
1664 assert_eq!(txn[0].output.len(), 3);
1665 check_spends!(txn[0], funding_tx);
1669 mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &commitment_tx);
1671 // Connect blocks until the HTLC's expiration is met, expecting a transaction broadcast.
1672 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 1);
1673 let htlc_timeout_tx = {
1674 let mut txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
1675 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1);
1676 check_spends!(txn[0], commitment_tx);
1680 // Check that we can still rebroadcast these packages/transactions if we're upgrading from an
1681 // old `ChannelMonitor` that did not exercise said rebroadcasting logic.
1682 if check_old_monitor_retries_after_upgrade {
1683 let serialized_monitor = hex::decode(
1684 "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",
1686 reload_node!(nodes[0], &nodes[0].node.encode(), &[&serialized_monitor], persister, new_chain_monitor, node_deserialized);
1689 // Connecting more blocks should result in the HTLC transactions being rebroadcast.
1690 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 6);
1691 if check_old_monitor_retries_after_upgrade {
1692 check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
1695 let txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
1696 if !nodes[0].connect_style.borrow().skips_blocks() {
1697 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 6);
1699 assert!(txn.len() < 6);
1702 assert_eq!(tx.input.len(), htlc_timeout_tx.input.len());
1703 assert_eq!(tx.output.len(), htlc_timeout_tx.output.len());
1704 assert_eq!(tx.input[0].previous_output, htlc_timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output);
1705 assert_eq!(tx.output[0], htlc_timeout_tx.output[0]);
1711 fn test_restored_packages_retry() {
1712 do_test_restored_packages_retry(false);
1713 do_test_restored_packages_retry(true);
1718 fn test_yield_anchors_events() {
1719 // Tests that two parties supporting anchor outputs can open a channel, route payments over
1720 // it, and finalize its resolution uncooperatively. Once the HTLCs are locked in, one side will
1721 // force close once the HTLCs expire. The force close should stem from an event emitted by LDK,
1722 // allowing the consumer to provide additional fees to the commitment transaction to be
1723 // broadcast. Once the commitment transaction confirms, events for the HTLC resolution should be
1724 // emitted by LDK, such that the consumer can attach fees to the zero fee HTLC transactions.
1725 let secp = Secp256k1::new();
1726 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1727 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1728 let mut anchors_config = UserConfig::default();
1729 anchors_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
1730 anchors_config.channel_handshake_config.negotiate_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx = true;
1731 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(anchors_config), Some(anchors_config)]);
1732 let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1734 let chan_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(
1735 &nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 500_000_000
1737 route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000);
1738 let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
1740 assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
1742 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + 1);
1743 check_closed_broadcast!(&nodes[0], true);
1744 assert!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
1746 get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id).provide_payment_preimage(
1747 &payment_hash, &payment_preimage, &node_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster,
1748 &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(node_cfgs[0].fee_estimator), &nodes[0].logger
1751 let mut holder_events = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
1752 assert_eq!(holder_events.len(), 1);
1753 let (commitment_tx, anchor_tx) = match holder_events.pop().unwrap() {
1754 Event::BumpTransaction(BumpTransactionEvent::ChannelClose { commitment_tx, anchor_descriptor, .. }) => {
1755 assert_eq!(commitment_tx.input.len(), 1);
1756 assert_eq!(commitment_tx.output.len(), 6);
1757 let mut anchor_tx = Transaction {
1759 lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO,
1761 TxIn { previous_output: anchor_descriptor.outpoint, ..Default::default() },
1762 TxIn { ..Default::default() },
1764 output: vec![TxOut {
1765 value: Amount::ONE_BTC.to_sat(),
1766 script_pubkey: Script::new_op_return(&[]),
1769 let signer = nodes[0].keys_manager.derive_channel_keys(
1770 anchor_descriptor.channel_value_satoshis, &anchor_descriptor.channel_keys_id,
1772 let funding_sig = signer.sign_holder_anchor_input(&mut anchor_tx, 0, &secp).unwrap();
1773 anchor_tx.input[0].witness = chan_utils::build_anchor_input_witness(
1774 &signer.pubkeys().funding_pubkey, &funding_sig
1776 (commitment_tx, anchor_tx)
1778 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1781 mine_transactions(&nodes[0], &[&commitment_tx, &anchor_tx]);
1782 check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1784 let mut holder_events = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
1785 // Certain block `ConnectStyle`s cause an extra `ChannelClose` event to be emitted since the
1786 // best block is updated before the confirmed transactions are notified.
1787 match *nodes[0].connect_style.borrow() {
1788 ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirst|ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstReorgsOnlyTip|ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstSkippingBlocks => {
1789 assert_eq!(holder_events.len(), 3);
1790 if let Event::BumpTransaction(BumpTransactionEvent::ChannelClose { .. }) = holder_events.remove(0) {}
1791 else { panic!("unexpected event"); }
1794 _ => assert_eq!(holder_events.len(), 2),
1796 let mut htlc_txs = Vec::with_capacity(2);
1797 for event in holder_events {
1799 Event::BumpTransaction(BumpTransactionEvent::HTLCResolution { htlc_descriptors, tx_lock_time, .. }) => {
1800 assert_eq!(htlc_descriptors.len(), 1);
1801 let htlc_descriptor = &htlc_descriptors[0];
1802 let signer = nodes[0].keys_manager.derive_channel_keys(
1803 htlc_descriptor.channel_value_satoshis, &htlc_descriptor.channel_keys_id
1805 let per_commitment_point = signer.get_per_commitment_point(htlc_descriptor.per_commitment_number, &secp);
1806 let mut htlc_tx = Transaction {
1808 lock_time: tx_lock_time,
1810 htlc_descriptor.unsigned_tx_input(), // HTLC input
1811 TxIn { ..Default::default() } // Fee input
1814 htlc_descriptor.tx_output(&per_commitment_point, &secp), // HTLC output
1815 TxOut { // Fee input change
1816 value: Amount::ONE_BTC.to_sat(),
1817 script_pubkey: Script::new_op_return(&[]),
1821 let our_sig = signer.sign_holder_htlc_transaction(&mut htlc_tx, 0, htlc_descriptor, &secp).unwrap();
1822 let witness_script = htlc_descriptor.witness_script(&per_commitment_point, &secp);
1823 htlc_tx.input[0].witness = htlc_descriptor.tx_input_witness(&our_sig, &witness_script);
1824 htlc_txs.push(htlc_tx);
1826 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1830 mine_transactions(&nodes[0], &[&htlc_txs[0], &htlc_txs[1]]);
1831 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
1833 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
1835 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
1837 let holder_events = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
1838 assert_eq!(holder_events.len(), 3);
1839 for event in holder_events {
1841 Event::SpendableOutputs { .. } => {},
1842 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1846 // Clear the remaining events as they're not relevant to what we're testing.
1847 nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
1852 fn test_anchors_aggregated_revoked_htlc_tx() {
1853 // Test that `ChannelMonitor`s can properly detect and claim funds from a counterparty claiming
1854 // multiple HTLCs from multiple channels in a single transaction via the success path from a
1855 // revoked commitment.
1856 let secp = Secp256k1::new();
1857 let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1858 // Required to sign a revoked commitment transaction
1859 chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
1860 let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1861 let mut anchors_config = UserConfig::default();
1862 anchors_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
1863 anchors_config.channel_handshake_config.negotiate_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx = true;
1864 let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(anchors_config), Some(anchors_config)]);
1866 let bob_persister: test_utils::TestPersister;
1867 let bob_chain_monitor: test_utils::TestChainMonitor;
1868 let bob_deserialized: ChannelManager<
1869 &test_utils::TestChainMonitor, &test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &test_utils::TestKeysInterface,
1870 &test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &test_utils::TestFeeEstimator,
1871 &test_utils::TestRouter, &test_utils::TestLogger,
1874 let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1876 let chan_a = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 20_000_000);
1877 let chan_b = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 20_000_000);
1879 // Serialize Bob with the initial state of both channels, which we'll use later.
1880 let bob_serialized = nodes[1].node.encode();
1882 // Route two payments for each channel from Alice to Bob to lock in the HTLCs.
1883 let payment_a = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 50_000_000);
1884 let payment_b = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 50_000_000);
1885 let payment_c = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 50_000_000);
1886 let payment_d = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 50_000_000);
1888 // Serialize Bob's monitors with the HTLCs locked in. We'll restart Bob later on with the state
1889 // at this point such that he broadcasts a revoked commitment transaction with the HTLCs
1891 let bob_serialized_monitor_a = get_monitor!(nodes[1], chan_a.2).encode();
1892 let bob_serialized_monitor_b = get_monitor!(nodes[1], chan_b.2).encode();
1894 // Bob claims all the HTLCs...
1895 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_a.0);
1896 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_b.0);
1897 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_c.0);
1898 claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_d.0);
1900 // ...and sends one back through each channel such that he has a motive to broadcast his
1902 send_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 30_000_000);
1903 send_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 30_000_000);
1905 // Restart Bob with the revoked state and provide the HTLC preimages he claimed.
1907 nodes[1], anchors_config, bob_serialized, &[&bob_serialized_monitor_a, &bob_serialized_monitor_b],
1908 bob_persister, bob_chain_monitor, bob_deserialized
1910 for chan_id in [chan_a.2, chan_b.2].iter() {
1911 let monitor = get_monitor!(nodes[1], chan_id);
1912 for payment in [payment_a, payment_b, payment_c, payment_d].iter() {
1913 monitor.provide_payment_preimage(
1914 &payment.1, &payment.0, &node_cfgs[1].tx_broadcaster,
1915 &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(node_cfgs[1].fee_estimator), &nodes[1].logger
1920 // Bob force closes by restarting with the outdated state, prompting the ChannelMonitors to
1921 // broadcast the latest commitment transaction known to them, which in our case is the one with
1922 // the HTLCs still pending.
1923 nodes[1].node.timer_tick_occurred();
1924 check_added_monitors(&nodes[1], 2);
1925 check_closed_event!(&nodes[1], 2, ClosureReason::OutdatedChannelManager);
1926 let (revoked_commitment_a, revoked_commitment_b) = {
1927 let txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
1928 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 2);
1929 assert_eq!(txn[0].output.len(), 6); // 2 HTLC outputs + 1 to_self output + 1 to_remote output + 2 anchor outputs
1930 assert_eq!(txn[1].output.len(), 6); // 2 HTLC outputs + 1 to_self output + 1 to_remote output + 2 anchor outputs
1931 if txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid == chan_a.3.txid() {
1932 check_spends!(&txn[0], &chan_a.3);
1933 check_spends!(&txn[1], &chan_b.3);
1934 (txn[0].clone(), txn[1].clone())
1936 check_spends!(&txn[1], &chan_a.3);
1937 check_spends!(&txn[0], &chan_b.3);
1938 (txn[1].clone(), txn[0].clone())
1942 // Bob should now receive two events to bump his revoked commitment transaction fees.
1943 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
1944 let events = nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
1945 assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
1947 let secret_key = SecretKey::from_slice(&[1; 32]).unwrap();
1948 let public_key = PublicKey::new(secret_key.public_key(&secp));
1949 let fee_utxo_script = Script::new_v0_p2wpkh(&public_key.wpubkey_hash().unwrap());
1950 let coinbase_tx = Transaction {
1952 lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO,
1953 input: vec![TxIn { ..Default::default() }],
1954 output: vec![TxOut { // UTXO to attach fees to `anchor_tx`
1955 value: Amount::ONE_BTC.to_sat(),
1956 script_pubkey: fee_utxo_script.clone(),
1959 let mut anchor_tx = Transaction {
1961 lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO,
1964 previous_output: bitcoin::OutPoint { txid: coinbase_tx.txid(), vout: 0 },
1965 ..Default::default()
1968 output: vec![TxOut { // Fee input change
1969 value: coinbase_tx.output[0].value / 2 ,
1970 script_pubkey: Script::new_op_return(&[]),
1973 let mut signers = Vec::with_capacity(2);
1974 for event in events {
1976 Event::BumpTransaction(BumpTransactionEvent::ChannelClose { anchor_descriptor, .. }) => {
1977 anchor_tx.input.push(TxIn {
1978 previous_output: anchor_descriptor.outpoint,
1979 ..Default::default()
1981 let signer = nodes[1].keys_manager.derive_channel_keys(
1982 anchor_descriptor.channel_value_satoshis, &anchor_descriptor.channel_keys_id,
1984 signers.push(signer);
1986 _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1989 for (i, signer) in signers.into_iter().enumerate() {
1990 let anchor_idx = i + 1;
1991 let funding_sig = signer.sign_holder_anchor_input(&mut anchor_tx, anchor_idx, &secp).unwrap();
1992 anchor_tx.input[anchor_idx].witness = chan_utils::build_anchor_input_witness(
1993 &signer.pubkeys().funding_pubkey, &funding_sig
1996 let fee_utxo_sig = {
1997 let witness_script = Script::new_p2pkh(&public_key.pubkey_hash());
1998 let sighash = hash_to_message!(&SighashCache::new(&anchor_tx).segwit_signature_hash(
1999 0, &witness_script, coinbase_tx.output[0].value, EcdsaSighashType::All
2001 let sig = sign(&secp, &sighash, &secret_key);
2002 let mut sig = sig.serialize_der().to_vec();
2003 sig.push(EcdsaSighashType::All as u8);
2006 anchor_tx.input[0].witness = Witness::from_vec(vec![fee_utxo_sig, public_key.to_bytes()]);
2007 check_spends!(anchor_tx, coinbase_tx, revoked_commitment_a, revoked_commitment_b);
2011 for node in &nodes {
2012 mine_transactions(node, &[&revoked_commitment_a, &revoked_commitment_b, &anchor_tx]);
2014 check_added_monitors!(&nodes[0], 2);
2015 check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[0], 2, true);
2016 check_closed_event!(&nodes[0], 2, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
2018 // Alice should detect the confirmed revoked commitments, and attempt to claim all of the
2021 let txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
2022 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 2);
2024 let (revoked_claim_a, revoked_claim_b) = if txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid == revoked_commitment_a.txid() {
2030 // TODO: to_self claim must be separate from HTLC claims
2031 assert_eq!(revoked_claim_a.input.len(), 3); // Spends both HTLC outputs and to_self output
2032 assert_eq!(revoked_claim_a.output.len(), 1);
2033 check_spends!(revoked_claim_a, revoked_commitment_a);
2034 assert_eq!(revoked_claim_b.input.len(), 3); // Spends both HTLC outputs and to_self output
2035 assert_eq!(revoked_claim_b.output.len(), 1);
2036 check_spends!(revoked_claim_b, revoked_commitment_b);
2039 // Since Bob was able to confirm his revoked commitment, he'll now try to claim the HTLCs
2040 // through the success path.
2041 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
2042 let mut events = nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
2043 // Certain block `ConnectStyle`s cause an extra `ChannelClose` event to be emitted since the
2044 // best block is updated before the confirmed transactions are notified.
2045 match *nodes[1].connect_style.borrow() {
2046 ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirst|ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstReorgsOnlyTip|ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstSkippingBlocks => {
2047 assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
2048 if let Event::BumpTransaction(BumpTransactionEvent::ChannelClose { .. }) = events.remove(0) {}
2049 else { panic!("unexpected event"); }
2050 if let Event::BumpTransaction(BumpTransactionEvent::ChannelClose { .. }) = events.remove(1) {}
2051 else { panic!("unexpected event"); }
2054 _ => assert_eq!(events.len(), 2),
2057 let secret_key = SecretKey::from_slice(&[1; 32]).unwrap();
2058 let public_key = PublicKey::new(secret_key.public_key(&secp));
2059 let fee_utxo_script = Script::new_v0_p2wpkh(&public_key.wpubkey_hash().unwrap());
2060 let coinbase_tx = Transaction {
2062 lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO,
2063 input: vec![TxIn { ..Default::default() }],
2064 output: vec![TxOut { // UTXO to attach fees to `htlc_tx`
2065 value: Amount::ONE_BTC.to_sat(),
2066 script_pubkey: fee_utxo_script.clone(),
2069 let mut htlc_tx = Transaction {
2071 lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO,
2072 input: vec![TxIn { // Fee input
2073 previous_output: bitcoin::OutPoint { txid: coinbase_tx.txid(), vout: 0 },
2074 ..Default::default()
2076 output: vec![TxOut { // Fee input change
2077 value: coinbase_tx.output[0].value / 2 ,
2078 script_pubkey: Script::new_op_return(&[]),
2081 let mut descriptors = Vec::with_capacity(4);
2082 for event in events {
2083 if let Event::BumpTransaction(BumpTransactionEvent::HTLCResolution { mut htlc_descriptors, tx_lock_time, .. }) = event {
2084 assert_eq!(htlc_descriptors.len(), 2);
2085 for htlc_descriptor in &htlc_descriptors {
2086 assert!(!htlc_descriptor.htlc.offered);
2087 let signer = nodes[1].keys_manager.derive_channel_keys(
2088 htlc_descriptor.channel_value_satoshis, &htlc_descriptor.channel_keys_id
2090 let per_commitment_point = signer.get_per_commitment_point(htlc_descriptor.per_commitment_number, &secp);
2091 htlc_tx.input.push(htlc_descriptor.unsigned_tx_input());
2092 htlc_tx.output.push(htlc_descriptor.tx_output(&per_commitment_point, &secp));
2094 descriptors.append(&mut htlc_descriptors);
2095 htlc_tx.lock_time = tx_lock_time;
2097 panic!("Unexpected event");
2100 for (idx, htlc_descriptor) in descriptors.into_iter().enumerate() {
2101 let htlc_input_idx = idx + 1;
2102 let signer = nodes[1].keys_manager.derive_channel_keys(
2103 htlc_descriptor.channel_value_satoshis, &htlc_descriptor.channel_keys_id
2105 let our_sig = signer.sign_holder_htlc_transaction(&htlc_tx, htlc_input_idx, &htlc_descriptor, &secp).unwrap();
2106 let per_commitment_point = signer.get_per_commitment_point(htlc_descriptor.per_commitment_number, &secp);
2107 let witness_script = htlc_descriptor.witness_script(&per_commitment_point, &secp);
2108 htlc_tx.input[htlc_input_idx].witness = htlc_descriptor.tx_input_witness(&our_sig, &witness_script);
2110 let fee_utxo_sig = {
2111 let witness_script = Script::new_p2pkh(&public_key.pubkey_hash());
2112 let sighash = hash_to_message!(&SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(
2113 0, &witness_script, coinbase_tx.output[0].value, EcdsaSighashType::All
2115 let sig = sign(&secp, &sighash, &secret_key);
2116 let mut sig = sig.serialize_der().to_vec();
2117 sig.push(EcdsaSighashType::All as u8);
2120 htlc_tx.input[0].witness = Witness::from_vec(vec![fee_utxo_sig, public_key.to_bytes()]);
2121 check_spends!(htlc_tx, coinbase_tx, revoked_commitment_a, revoked_commitment_b);
2125 for node in &nodes {
2126 mine_transaction(node, &htlc_tx);
2129 // Alice should see that Bob is trying to claim to HTLCs, so she should now try to claim them at
2130 // the second level instead.
2131 let revoked_claims = {
2132 let txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
2133 assert_eq!(txn.len(), 4);
2135 let revoked_to_self_claim_a = txn.iter().find(|tx|
2136 tx.input.len() == 1 &&
2137 tx.output.len() == 1 &&
2138 tx.input[0].previous_output.txid == revoked_commitment_a.txid()
2140 check_spends!(revoked_to_self_claim_a, revoked_commitment_a);
2142 let revoked_to_self_claim_b = txn.iter().find(|tx|
2143 tx.input.len() == 1 &&
2144 tx.output.len() == 1 &&
2145 tx.input[0].previous_output.txid == revoked_commitment_b.txid()
2147 check_spends!(revoked_to_self_claim_b, revoked_commitment_b);
2149 let revoked_htlc_claims = txn.iter().filter(|tx|
2150 tx.input.len() == 2 &&
2151 tx.output.len() == 1 &&
2152 tx.input[0].previous_output.txid == htlc_tx.txid()
2153 ).collect::<Vec<_>>();
2154 assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_claims.len(), 2);
2155 for revoked_htlc_claim in revoked_htlc_claims {
2156 check_spends!(revoked_htlc_claim, htlc_tx);
2161 for node in &nodes {
2162 mine_transactions(node, &revoked_claims.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>());
2166 // Connect one block to make sure the HTLC events are not yielded while ANTI_REORG_DELAY has not
2168 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1);
2169 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
2171 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
2172 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
2174 // Connect the remaining blocks to reach ANTI_REORG_DELAY.
2175 connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 2);
2176 connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 2);
2178 assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
2179 let spendable_output_events = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
2180 assert_eq!(spendable_output_events.len(), 4);
2181 for (idx, event) in spendable_output_events.iter().enumerate() {
2182 if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs } = event {
2183 assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1);
2184 let spend_tx = nodes[0].keys_manager.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(
2185 &[&outputs[0]], Vec::new(), Script::new_op_return(&[]), 253, &Secp256k1::new(),
2187 check_spends!(spend_tx, revoked_claims[idx]);
2189 panic!("unexpected event");
2193 assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
2194 assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
2195 assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_claimable_balances(&[]).is_empty());
2196 // TODO: From Bob's PoV, he still thinks he can claim the outputs from his revoked commitment.
2197 // This needs to be fixed before we enable pruning `ChannelMonitor`s once they don't have any
2198 // balances to claim.
2200 // The 6 claimable balances correspond to his `to_self` outputs and the 2 HTLC outputs in each
2201 // revoked commitment which Bob has the preimage for.
2202 assert_eq!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_claimable_balances(&[]).len(), 6);