use bitcoin::blockdata::script::Builder;
use bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::TxOut;
use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes;
+use bitcoin::hash_types::BlockHash;
use chain;
use chain::Access;
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs::{DecodeError, ErrorAction, LightningError, RoutingMessageHandler, NetAddress, MAX_VALUE_MSAT};
use ln::msgs::{ChannelAnnouncement, ChannelUpdate, NodeAnnouncement, OptionalField};
+use ln::msgs::{QueryChannelRange, ReplyChannelRange, QueryShortChannelIds, ReplyShortChannelIdsEnd};
use ln::msgs;
use util::ser::{Writeable, Readable, Writer};
use util::logger::Logger;
+use util::events;
use std::{cmp, fmt};
use std::sync::{RwLock, RwLockReadGuard};
use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering};
+use std::sync::Mutex;
use std::collections::BTreeMap;
use std::collections::btree_map::Entry as BtreeEntry;
+use std::collections::HashMap;
use std::ops::Deref;
use bitcoin::hashes::hex::ToHex;
+/// Maximum number of short_channel_id values that can be encoded in a
+/// single reply_channel_range or query_short_channel_ids messages when
+/// using raw encoding. The maximum value ensures that the 8-byte SCIDs
+/// fit inside the maximum size of the Lightning message, 65535-bytes.
+const MAX_SHORT_CHANNEL_ID_BATCH_SIZE: usize = 8000;
+
+/// Maximum number of reply_channel_range messages we will allow in
+/// reply to a query_channel_range. This value creates an upper-limit
+/// on the number of SCIDs we process in reply to a single query.
+const MAX_REPLY_CHANNEL_RANGE_PER_QUERY: usize = 250;
+
/// Represents the network as nodes and channels between them
#[derive(PartialEq)]
pub struct NetworkGraph {
+ genesis_hash: BlockHash,
channels: BTreeMap<u64, ChannelInfo>,
nodes: BTreeMap<PublicKey, NodeInfo>,
}
pub network_graph: RwLock<NetworkGraph>,
chain_access: Option<C>,
full_syncs_requested: AtomicUsize,
+ pending_events: Mutex<Vec<events::MessageSendEvent>>,
+ chan_range_query_tasks: Mutex<HashMap<PublicKey, ChanRangeQueryTask>>,
+ scid_query_tasks: Mutex<HashMap<PublicKey, ScidQueryTask>>,
logger: L,
}
/// Chain monitor is used to make sure announced channels exist on-chain,
/// channel data is correct, and that the announcement is signed with
/// channel owners' keys.
- pub fn new(chain_access: Option<C>, logger: L) -> Self {
+ pub fn new(genesis_hash: BlockHash, chain_access: Option<C>, logger: L) -> Self {
NetGraphMsgHandler {
secp_ctx: Secp256k1::verification_only(),
- network_graph: RwLock::new(NetworkGraph {
- channels: BTreeMap::new(),
- nodes: BTreeMap::new(),
- }),
+ network_graph: RwLock::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_hash)),
full_syncs_requested: AtomicUsize::new(0),
chain_access,
+ pending_events: Mutex::new(vec![]),
+ chan_range_query_tasks: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()),
+ scid_query_tasks: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()),
logger,
}
}
network_graph: RwLock::new(network_graph),
full_syncs_requested: AtomicUsize::new(0),
chain_access,
+ pending_events: Mutex::new(vec![]),
+ chan_range_query_tasks: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()),
+ scid_query_tasks: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()),
logger,
}
}
pub fn read_locked_graph<'a>(&'a self) -> LockedNetworkGraph<'a> {
LockedNetworkGraph(self.network_graph.read().unwrap())
}
+
+ /// Enqueues a message send event for a batch of short_channel_ids
+ /// in a task.
+ fn finalize_query_short_ids(&self, task: &mut ScidQueryTask) {
+ let scid_size = std::cmp::min(task.short_channel_ids.len(), MAX_SHORT_CHANNEL_ID_BATCH_SIZE);
+ let mut short_channel_ids: Vec<u64> = Vec::with_capacity(scid_size);
+ for scid in task.short_channel_ids.drain(..scid_size) {
+ short_channel_ids.push(scid);
+ }
+
+ log_debug!(self.logger, "Sending query_short_channel_ids peer={}, batch_size={}", log_pubkey!(task.node_id), scid_size);
+
+ // enqueue the message to the peer
+ let mut pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
+ pending_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery {
+ node_id: task.node_id.clone(),
+ msg: QueryShortChannelIds {
+ chain_hash: task.chain_hash.clone(),
+ short_channel_ids,
+ }
+ });
+ }
}
impl<'a> LockedNetworkGraph<'a> {
impl<C: Deref + Sync + Send, L: Deref + Sync + Send> RoutingMessageHandler for NetGraphMsgHandler<C, L> where C::Target: chain::Access, L::Target: Logger {
fn handle_node_announcement(&self, msg: &msgs::NodeAnnouncement) -> Result<bool, LightningError> {
- self.network_graph.write().unwrap().update_node_from_announcement(msg, Some(&self.secp_ctx))
+ self.network_graph.write().unwrap().update_node_from_announcement(msg, &self.secp_ctx)?;
+ Ok(msg.contents.excess_data.is_empty() && msg.contents.excess_address_data.is_empty())
}
fn handle_channel_announcement(&self, msg: &msgs::ChannelAnnouncement) -> Result<bool, LightningError> {
- if msg.contents.node_id_1 == msg.contents.node_id_2 || msg.contents.bitcoin_key_1 == msg.contents.bitcoin_key_2 {
- return Err(LightningError{err: "Channel announcement node had a channel with itself".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
- }
-
- let utxo_value = match &self.chain_access {
- &None => {
- // Tentatively accept, potentially exposing us to DoS attacks
- None
- },
- &Some(ref chain_access) => {
- match chain_access.get_utxo(&msg.contents.chain_hash, msg.contents.short_channel_id) {
- Ok(TxOut { value, script_pubkey }) => {
- let expected_script = Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_PUSHNUM_2)
- .push_slice(&msg.contents.bitcoin_key_1.serialize())
- .push_slice(&msg.contents.bitcoin_key_2.serialize())
- .push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_PUSHNUM_2)
- .push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_CHECKMULTISIG).into_script().to_v0_p2wsh();
- if script_pubkey != expected_script {
- return Err(LightningError{err: format!("Channel announcement key ({}) didn't match on-chain script ({})", script_pubkey.to_hex(), expected_script.to_hex()), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
- }
- //TODO: Check if value is worth storing, use it to inform routing, and compare it
- //to the new HTLC max field in channel_update
- Some(value)
- },
- Err(chain::AccessError::UnknownChain) => {
- return Err(LightningError{err: format!("Channel announced on an unknown chain ({})", msg.contents.chain_hash.encode().to_hex()), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
- },
- Err(chain::AccessError::UnknownTx) => {
- return Err(LightningError{err: "Channel announced without corresponding UTXO entry".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
- },
- }
- },
- };
- let result = self.network_graph.write().unwrap().update_channel_from_announcement(msg, utxo_value, Some(&self.secp_ctx));
+ self.network_graph.write().unwrap().update_channel_from_announcement(msg, &self.chain_access, &self.secp_ctx)?;
log_trace!(self.logger, "Added channel_announcement for {}{}", msg.contents.short_channel_id, if !msg.contents.excess_data.is_empty() { " with excess uninterpreted data!" } else { "" });
- result
+ Ok(msg.contents.excess_data.is_empty())
}
fn handle_htlc_fail_channel_update(&self, update: &msgs::HTLCFailChannelUpdate) {
match update {
&msgs::HTLCFailChannelUpdate::ChannelUpdateMessage { ref msg } => {
- let _ = self.network_graph.write().unwrap().update_channel(msg, Some(&self.secp_ctx));
+ let _ = self.network_graph.write().unwrap().update_channel(msg, &self.secp_ctx);
},
&msgs::HTLCFailChannelUpdate::ChannelClosed { short_channel_id, is_permanent } => {
self.network_graph.write().unwrap().close_channel_from_update(short_channel_id, is_permanent);
}
fn handle_channel_update(&self, msg: &msgs::ChannelUpdate) -> Result<bool, LightningError> {
- self.network_graph.write().unwrap().update_channel(msg, Some(&self.secp_ctx))
+ self.network_graph.write().unwrap().update_channel(msg, &self.secp_ctx)?;
+ Ok(msg.contents.excess_data.is_empty())
}
fn get_next_channel_announcements(&self, starting_point: u64, batch_amount: u8) -> Vec<(ChannelAnnouncement, Option<ChannelUpdate>, Option<ChannelUpdate>)> {
false
}
}
+
+ fn query_channel_range(&self, their_node_id: &PublicKey, chain_hash: BlockHash, first_blocknum: u32, number_of_blocks: u32) -> Result<(), LightningError> {
+ // We must ensure that we only have a single in-flight query
+ // to the remote peer. If we already have a query, then we fail
+ let mut query_range_tasks_lock = self.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap();
+ let query_range_tasks = &mut *query_range_tasks_lock;
+ if query_range_tasks.contains_key(their_node_id) {
+ return Err(LightningError {
+ err: String::from("query_channel_range already in-flight"),
+ action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError,
+ });
+ }
+
+ // Construct a new task to keep track of the query until the full
+ // range query has been completed
+ let task = ChanRangeQueryTask::new(their_node_id, chain_hash, first_blocknum, number_of_blocks);
+ query_range_tasks.insert(their_node_id.clone(), task);
+
+ // Enqueue the message send event
+ log_debug!(self.logger, "Sending query_channel_range peer={}, first_blocknum={}, number_of_blocks={}", log_pubkey!(their_node_id), first_blocknum, number_of_blocks);
+ let mut pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
+ pending_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::SendChannelRangeQuery {
+ node_id: their_node_id.clone(),
+ msg: QueryChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ first_blocknum,
+ number_of_blocks,
+ },
+ });
+ Ok(())
+ }
+
+ /// A query should only request channels referring to unspent outputs.
+ /// This method does not validate this requirement and expects the
+ /// caller to ensure SCIDs are unspent.
+ fn query_short_channel_ids(&self, their_node_id: &PublicKey, chain_hash: BlockHash, short_channel_ids: Vec<u64>) -> Result<(), LightningError> {
+ // Create a new task or add to the existing task
+ let mut query_scids_tasks_lock = self.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap();
+ let query_scids_tasks = &mut *query_scids_tasks_lock;
+
+ // For an existing task we append the short_channel_ids which will be sent when the
+ // current in-flight batch completes.
+ if let Some(task) = query_scids_tasks.get_mut(their_node_id) {
+ task.add(short_channel_ids);
+ return Ok(());
+ }
+
+ // For a new task we create the task with short_channel_ids and send the first
+ // batch immediately.
+ query_scids_tasks.insert(their_node_id.clone(), ScidQueryTask::new(
+ their_node_id,
+ chain_hash.clone(),
+ short_channel_ids,
+ ));
+ let task = query_scids_tasks.get_mut(their_node_id).unwrap();
+ self.finalize_query_short_ids(task);
+ return Ok(());
+ }
+
+ fn handle_reply_channel_range(&self, their_node_id: &PublicKey, msg: &ReplyChannelRange) -> Result<(), LightningError> {
+ log_debug!(self.logger, "Handling reply_channel_range peer={}, first_blocknum={}, number_of_blocks={}, full_information={}, scids={}", log_pubkey!(their_node_id), msg.first_blocknum, msg.number_of_blocks, msg.full_information, msg.short_channel_ids.len(),);
+
+ // First we obtain a lock on the task hashmap. In order to avoid borrowing issues
+ // we will access the task as needed.
+ let mut query_range_tasks = self.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap();
+
+ // If there is no currently executing task then we have received
+ // an invalid message and will return an error
+ if query_range_tasks.get(their_node_id).is_none() {
+ return Err(LightningError {
+ err: String::from("Received unknown reply_channel_range message"),
+ action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError,
+ });
+ }
+
+ // Now that we know we have a task, we can extract a few values for use
+ // in validations without having to access the task repeatedly
+ let (task_chain_hash, task_first_blocknum, task_number_of_blocks, task_received_first_block, task_received_last_block, task_number_of_replies) = {
+ let task = query_range_tasks.get(their_node_id).unwrap();
+ (task.chain_hash, task.first_blocknum, task.number_of_blocks, task.received_first_block, task.received_last_block, task.number_of_replies)
+ };
+
+ // Validate the chain_hash matches the chain_hash we used in the query.
+ // If it does not, then the message is malformed and we return an error
+ if msg.chain_hash != task_chain_hash {
+ query_range_tasks.remove(their_node_id);
+ return Err(LightningError {
+ err: String::from("Received reply_channel_range with invalid chain_hash"),
+ action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError,
+ });
+ }
+
+ // Validate that the remote node maintains up-to-date channel
+ // information for chain_hash. Some nodes use the full_information
+ // flag to indicate multi-part messages so we must check whether
+ // we received information as well.
+ if !msg.full_information && msg.short_channel_ids.len() == 0 {
+ query_range_tasks.remove(their_node_id);
+ return Err(LightningError {
+ err: String::from("Received reply_channel_range with no information available"),
+ action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError,
+ });
+ }
+
+ // Calculate the last block for the message and the task
+ let msg_last_block = last_blocknum(msg.first_blocknum, msg.number_of_blocks);
+ let task_last_block = last_blocknum(task_first_blocknum, task_number_of_blocks);
+
+ // On the first message...
+ if task_received_first_block.is_none() {
+ // The replies can be a superset of the queried block range, but the
+ // replies must include our requested query range. We check if the
+ // start of the replies is greater than the start of our query. If
+ // so, the start of our query is excluded and the message is malformed.
+ if msg.first_blocknum > task_first_blocknum {
+ query_range_tasks.remove(their_node_id);
+ return Err(LightningError {
+ err: String::from("Failing reply_channel_range with invalid first_blocknum"),
+ action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError,
+ });
+ }
+
+ // Next, we ensure the reply has at least some information matching
+ // our query. If the received last_blocknum is less than our query's
+ // first_blocknum then the reply does not encompass the query range
+ // and the message is malformed.
+ if msg_last_block < task_first_blocknum {
+ query_range_tasks.remove(their_node_id);
+ return Err(LightningError {
+ err: String::from("Failing reply_channel_range with non-overlapping first reply"),
+ action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError,
+ });
+ }
+
+ // Capture the first block and last block so that subsequent messages
+ // can be validated.
+ let task = query_range_tasks.get_mut(their_node_id).unwrap();
+ task.received_first_block = Some(msg.first_blocknum);
+ task.received_last_block = Some(msg_last_block);
+ }
+ // On subsequent message(s)...
+ else {
+ // We need to validate the sequence of the reply message is expected.
+ // Subsequent messages must set the first_blocknum to the previous
+ // message's first_blocknum plus number_of_blocks. There is discrepancy
+ // in implementation where some resume on the last sent block. We will
+ // loosen the restriction and accept either, and otherwise consider the
+ // message malformed and return an error.
+ let task_received_last_block = task_received_last_block.unwrap();
+ if msg.first_blocknum != task_received_last_block && msg.first_blocknum != task_received_last_block + 1 {
+ query_range_tasks.remove(their_node_id);
+ return Err(LightningError {
+ err: String::from("Failing reply_channel_range with invalid sequence"),
+ action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError,
+ });
+ }
+
+ // Next we check to see that we have received a realistic number of
+ // reply messages for a query. This caps the allocation exposure
+ // for short_channel_ids that will be batched and sent in query channels.
+ if task_number_of_replies + 1 > MAX_REPLY_CHANNEL_RANGE_PER_QUERY {
+ query_range_tasks.remove(their_node_id);
+ return Err(LightningError {
+ err: String::from("Failing reply_channel_range due to excessive messages"),
+ action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError,
+ });
+ }
+
+ // Capture the last_block in our task so that subsequent messages
+ // can be validated.
+ let task = query_range_tasks.get_mut(their_node_id).unwrap();
+ task.number_of_replies += 1;
+ task.received_last_block = Some(msg_last_block);
+ }
+
+ // We filter the short_channel_ids to those inside the query range.
+ // The most significant 3-bytes of the short_channel_id are the block.
+ {
+ let mut filtered_short_channel_ids: Vec<u64> = msg.short_channel_ids.clone().into_iter().filter(|short_channel_id| {
+ let block = short_channel_id >> 40;
+ return block >= query_range_tasks.get(their_node_id).unwrap().first_blocknum as u64 && block <= task_last_block as u64;
+ }).collect();
+ let task = query_range_tasks.get_mut(their_node_id).unwrap();
+ task.short_channel_ids.append(&mut filtered_short_channel_ids);
+ }
+
+ // The final message is indicated by a last_blocknum that is equal to
+ // or greater than the query's last_blocknum.
+ if msg_last_block >= task_last_block {
+ log_debug!(self.logger, "Completed query_channel_range: peer={}, first_blocknum={}, number_of_blocks={}", log_pubkey!(their_node_id), task_first_blocknum, task_number_of_blocks);
+
+ // We can now fire off a query to obtain routing messages for the
+ // accumulated short_channel_ids.
+ {
+ let task = query_range_tasks.get_mut(their_node_id).unwrap();
+ let mut short_channel_ids = Vec::new();
+ std::mem::swap(&mut short_channel_ids, &mut task.short_channel_ids);
+ self.query_short_channel_ids(their_node_id, task.chain_hash, short_channel_ids)?;
+ }
+
+ // We can remove the query range task now that the query is complete.
+ query_range_tasks.remove(their_node_id);
+ }
+ Ok(())
+ }
+
+ /// When a query is initiated the remote peer will begin streaming
+ /// gossip messages. In the event of a failure, we may have received
+ /// some channel information. Before trying with another peer, the
+ /// caller should update its set of SCIDs that need to be queried.
+ fn handle_reply_short_channel_ids_end(&self, their_node_id: &PublicKey, msg: &ReplyShortChannelIdsEnd) -> Result<(), LightningError> {
+ log_debug!(self.logger, "Handling reply_short_channel_ids_end peer={}, full_information={}", log_pubkey!(their_node_id), msg.full_information);
+
+ // First we obtain a lock on the task hashmap. In order to avoid borrowing issues
+ // we will access the task as needed.
+ let mut query_short_channel_ids_tasks = self.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap();
+
+ // If there is no existing task then we have received an unknown
+ // message and should return an error.
+ if query_short_channel_ids_tasks.get(their_node_id).is_none() {
+ return Err(LightningError {
+ err: String::from("Unknown reply_short_channel_ids_end message"),
+ action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError,
+ });
+ }
+
+ // If the reply's chain_hash does not match the task's chain_hash then
+ // the reply is malformed and we should return an error.
+ if msg.chain_hash != query_short_channel_ids_tasks.get(their_node_id).unwrap().chain_hash {
+ query_short_channel_ids_tasks.remove(their_node_id);
+ return Err(LightningError {
+ err: String::from("Received reply_short_channel_ids_end with incorrect chain_hash"),
+ action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError
+ });
+ }
+
+ // If the remote node does not have up-to-date information for the
+ // chain_hash they will set full_information=false. We can fail
+ // the result and try again with a different peer.
+ if !msg.full_information {
+ query_short_channel_ids_tasks.remove(their_node_id);
+ return Err(LightningError {
+ err: String::from("Received reply_short_channel_ids_end with no information"),
+ action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError
+ });
+ }
+
+ // If we have more scids to process we send the next batch in the task
+ {
+ let task = query_short_channel_ids_tasks.get_mut(their_node_id).unwrap();
+ if task.short_channel_ids.len() > 0 {
+ self.finalize_query_short_ids(task);
+ return Ok(());
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Otherwise the task is complete and we can remove it
+ log_debug!(self.logger, "Completed query_short_channel_ids peer={}", log_pubkey!(their_node_id));
+ query_short_channel_ids_tasks.remove(their_node_id);
+ Ok(())
+ }
+
+ /// There are potential DoS vectors when handling inbound queries.
+ /// Handling requests with first_blocknum very far away may trigger repeated
+ /// disk I/O if the NetworkGraph is not fully in-memory.
+ fn handle_query_channel_range(&self, _their_node_id: &PublicKey, _msg: &QueryChannelRange) -> Result<(), LightningError> {
+ // TODO
+ Err(LightningError {
+ err: String::from("Not implemented"),
+ action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError,
+ })
+ }
+
+ /// There are potential DoS vectors when handling inbound queries.
+ /// Handling requests with first_blocknum very far away may trigger repeated
+ /// disk I/O if the NetworkGraph is not fully in-memory.
+ fn handle_query_short_channel_ids(&self, _their_node_id: &PublicKey, _msg: &QueryShortChannelIds) -> Result<(), LightningError> {
+ // TODO
+ Err(LightningError {
+ err: String::from("Not implemented"),
+ action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError,
+ })
+ }
+}
+
+impl<C: Deref, L: Deref> events::MessageSendEventsProvider for NetGraphMsgHandler<C, L>
+where
+ C::Target: chain::Access,
+ L::Target: Logger,
+{
+ fn get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(&self) -> Vec<events::MessageSendEvent> {
+ let mut ret = Vec::new();
+ let mut pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
+ std::mem::swap(&mut ret, &mut pending_events);
+ ret
+ }
+}
+
+/// Safely calculates the last_blocknum given a first_blocknum and
+/// number_of_blocks by returning the u32::MAX-1 if there is an overflow
+fn last_blocknum(first_blocknum: u32, number_of_blocks: u32) -> u32 {
+ match first_blocknum.checked_add(number_of_blocks) {
+ Some(val) => val - 1,
+ None => 0xffff_ffff - 1,
+ }
+}
+
+/// Maintains state for a channel range query that we initiated.
+/// The query may result in one or more reply_channel_range messages
+/// being received. This struct helps determine the status of the query
+/// when there are multiple replies. It also collects results for initiating
+/// SCID queries.
+///
+/// The task is complete and can be cleaned up when a reply meets or
+/// exceeds the last block in the query. The collected SCIDs in the task
+/// can be used to generate an ScidQueryTask.
+///
+/// A query may fail if the recipient does not maintain up-to-date
+/// information for the chain or if the recipient fails to reply within
+/// a reasonable amount of time. In either event, the query can be
+/// re-initiated with a different peer.
+pub struct ChanRangeQueryTask {
+ /// The public key of the node we will be sending queries to
+ pub node_id: PublicKey,
+ /// The genesis hash of the blockchain being queried
+ pub chain_hash: BlockHash,
+ /// The height of the first block for the channel UTXOs being queried
+ pub first_blocknum: u32,
+ /// The number of blocks to include in the query results
+ pub number_of_blocks: u32,
+ /// Tracks the number of reply messages we have received
+ pub number_of_replies: usize,
+ /// The height of the first block received in a reply. This value
+ /// should be less than or equal to the first_blocknum requested in
+ /// the query_channel_range. This allows the range of the replies to
+ /// contain, but not necessarily strictly, the queried range.
+ pub received_first_block: Option<u32>,
+ /// The height of the last block received in a reply. This value
+ /// will get incrementally closer to the target of
+ /// first_blocknum plus number_of_blocks from the query_channel_range.
+ pub received_last_block: Option<u32>,
+ /// Contains short_channel_ids received in one or more reply messages.
+ /// These will be sent in one ore more query_short_channel_ids messages
+ /// when the task is complete.
+ pub short_channel_ids: Vec<u64>,
+}
+
+impl ChanRangeQueryTask {
+ /// Constructs a new GossipQueryRangeTask
+ pub fn new(their_node_id: &PublicKey, chain_hash: BlockHash, first_blocknum: u32, number_of_blocks: u32) -> Self {
+ ChanRangeQueryTask {
+ node_id: their_node_id.clone(),
+ chain_hash,
+ first_blocknum,
+ number_of_blocks,
+ number_of_replies: 0,
+ received_first_block: None,
+ received_last_block: None,
+ short_channel_ids: vec![],
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/// Maintains state when sending one or more short_channel_ids messages
+/// to a peer. Only a single SCID query can be in-flight with a peer. The
+/// number of SCIDs per query is limited by the size of a Lightning message
+/// payload. When querying a large number of SCIDs (results of a large
+/// channel range query for instance), multiple query_short_channel_ids
+/// messages need to be sent. This task maintains the list of awaiting
+/// SCIDs to be queried.
+///
+/// When a successful reply_short_channel_ids_end message is received, the
+/// next batch of SCIDs can be sent. When no remaining SCIDs exist in the
+/// task, the task is complete and can be cleaned up.
+///
+/// The recipient may reply indicating that up-to-date information for the
+/// chain is not maintained. A query may also fail to complete within a
+/// reasonable amount of time. In either event, the short_channel_ids
+/// can be queried from a different peer after validating the set of
+/// SCIDs that still need to be queried.
+pub struct ScidQueryTask {
+ /// The public key of the node we will be sending queries to
+ pub node_id: PublicKey,
+ /// The genesis hash of the blockchain being queried
+ pub chain_hash: BlockHash,
+ /// A vector of short_channel_ids that we would like routing gossip
+ /// information for. This list will be chunked and sent to the peer
+ /// in one or more query_short_channel_ids messages.
+ pub short_channel_ids: Vec<u64>,
+}
+
+impl ScidQueryTask {
+ /// Constructs a new GossipQueryShortChannelIdsTask
+ pub fn new(their_node_id: &PublicKey, chain_hash: BlockHash, short_channel_ids: Vec<u64>) -> Self {
+ ScidQueryTask {
+ node_id: their_node_id.clone(),
+ chain_hash,
+ short_channel_ids,
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// Adds short_channel_ids to the pending list of short_channel_ids
+ /// to be sent in the next request. You can add additional values
+ /// while a query is in-flight. These new values will be sent once
+ /// the active query has completed.
+ pub fn add(&mut self, mut short_channel_ids: Vec<u64>) {
+ self.short_channel_ids.append(&mut short_channel_ids);
+ }
}
#[derive(PartialEq, Debug)]
impl Writeable for NetworkGraph {
fn write<W: Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), ::std::io::Error> {
+ self.genesis_hash.write(writer)?;
(self.channels.len() as u64).write(writer)?;
for (ref chan_id, ref chan_info) in self.channels.iter() {
(*chan_id).write(writer)?;
impl Readable for NetworkGraph {
fn read<R: ::std::io::Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<NetworkGraph, DecodeError> {
+ let genesis_hash: BlockHash = Readable::read(reader)?;
let channels_count: u64 = Readable::read(reader)?;
let mut channels = BTreeMap::new();
for _ in 0..channels_count {
nodes.insert(node_id, node_info);
}
Ok(NetworkGraph {
+ genesis_hash,
channels,
nodes,
})
}
/// Creates a new, empty, network graph.
- pub fn new() -> NetworkGraph {
+ pub fn new(genesis_hash: BlockHash) -> NetworkGraph {
Self {
+ genesis_hash,
channels: BTreeMap::new(),
nodes: BTreeMap::new(),
}
}
- /// For an already known node (from channel announcements), update its stored properties from a given node announcement
- /// Announcement signatures are checked here only if Secp256k1 object is provided.
- fn update_node_from_announcement(&mut self, msg: &msgs::NodeAnnouncement, secp_ctx: Option<&Secp256k1<secp256k1::VerifyOnly>>) -> Result<bool, LightningError> {
- if let Some(sig_verifier) = secp_ctx {
- let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
- secp_verify_sig!(sig_verifier, &msg_hash, &msg.signature, &msg.contents.node_id);
- }
+ /// For an already known node (from channel announcements), update its stored properties from a
+ /// given node announcement.
+ ///
+ /// You probably don't want to call this directly, instead relying on a NetGraphMsgHandler's
+ /// RoutingMessageHandler implementation to call it indirectly. This may be useful to accept
+ /// routing messages from a source using a protocol other than the lightning P2P protocol.
+ pub fn update_node_from_announcement<T: secp256k1::Verification>(&mut self, msg: &msgs::NodeAnnouncement, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> Result<(), LightningError> {
+ let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
+ secp_verify_sig!(secp_ctx, &msg_hash, &msg.signature, &msg.contents.node_id);
+ self.update_node_from_announcement_intern(&msg.contents, Some(&msg))
+ }
+
+ /// For an already known node (from channel announcements), update its stored properties from a
+ /// given node announcement without verifying the associated signatures. Because we aren't
+ /// given the associated signatures here we cannot relay the node announcement to any of our
+ /// peers.
+ pub fn update_node_from_unsigned_announcement(&mut self, msg: &msgs::UnsignedNodeAnnouncement) -> Result<(), LightningError> {
+ self.update_node_from_announcement_intern(msg, None)
+ }
- match self.nodes.get_mut(&msg.contents.node_id) {
+ fn update_node_from_announcement_intern(&mut self, msg: &msgs::UnsignedNodeAnnouncement, full_msg: Option<&msgs::NodeAnnouncement>) -> Result<(), LightningError> {
+ match self.nodes.get_mut(&msg.node_id) {
None => Err(LightningError{err: "No existing channels for node_announcement".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}),
Some(node) => {
if let Some(node_info) = node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
- if node_info.last_update >= msg.contents.timestamp {
+ if node_info.last_update >= msg.timestamp {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Update older than last processed update".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
}
- let should_relay = msg.contents.excess_data.is_empty() && msg.contents.excess_address_data.is_empty();
+ let should_relay = msg.excess_data.is_empty() && msg.excess_address_data.is_empty();
node.announcement_info = Some(NodeAnnouncementInfo {
- features: msg.contents.features.clone(),
- last_update: msg.contents.timestamp,
- rgb: msg.contents.rgb,
- alias: msg.contents.alias,
- addresses: msg.contents.addresses.clone(),
- announcement_message: if should_relay { Some(msg.clone()) } else { None },
+ features: msg.features.clone(),
+ last_update: msg.timestamp,
+ rgb: msg.rgb,
+ alias: msg.alias,
+ addresses: msg.addresses.clone(),
+ announcement_message: if should_relay { full_msg.cloned() } else { None },
});
- Ok(should_relay)
+ Ok(())
}
}
}
- /// For a new or already known (from previous announcement) channel, store or update channel info.
- /// Also store nodes (if not stored yet) the channel is between, and make node aware of this channel.
- /// Checking utxo on-chain is useful if we receive an update for already known channel id,
- /// which is probably result of a reorg. In that case, we update channel info only if the
- /// utxo was checked, otherwise stick to the existing update, to prevent DoS risks.
- /// Announcement signatures are checked here only if Secp256k1 object is provided.
- fn update_channel_from_announcement(&mut self, msg: &msgs::ChannelAnnouncement, utxo_value: Option<u64>, secp_ctx: Option<&Secp256k1<secp256k1::VerifyOnly>>) -> Result<bool, LightningError> {
- if let Some(sig_verifier) = secp_ctx {
- let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
- secp_verify_sig!(sig_verifier, &msg_hash, &msg.node_signature_1, &msg.contents.node_id_1);
- secp_verify_sig!(sig_verifier, &msg_hash, &msg.node_signature_2, &msg.contents.node_id_2);
- secp_verify_sig!(sig_verifier, &msg_hash, &msg.bitcoin_signature_1, &msg.contents.bitcoin_key_1);
- secp_verify_sig!(sig_verifier, &msg_hash, &msg.bitcoin_signature_2, &msg.contents.bitcoin_key_2);
+ /// Store or update channel info from a channel announcement.
+ ///
+ /// You probably don't want to call this directly, instead relying on a NetGraphMsgHandler's
+ /// RoutingMessageHandler implementation to call it indirectly. This may be useful to accept
+ /// routing messages from a source using a protocol other than the lightning P2P protocol.
+ ///
+ /// If a `chain::Access` object is provided via `chain_access`, it will be called to verify
+ /// the corresponding UTXO exists on chain and is correctly-formatted.
+ pub fn update_channel_from_announcement<T: secp256k1::Verification, C: Deref>
+ (&mut self, msg: &msgs::ChannelAnnouncement, chain_access: &Option<C>, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>)
+ -> Result<(), LightningError>
+ where C::Target: chain::Access {
+ let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
+ secp_verify_sig!(secp_ctx, &msg_hash, &msg.node_signature_1, &msg.contents.node_id_1);
+ secp_verify_sig!(secp_ctx, &msg_hash, &msg.node_signature_2, &msg.contents.node_id_2);
+ secp_verify_sig!(secp_ctx, &msg_hash, &msg.bitcoin_signature_1, &msg.contents.bitcoin_key_1);
+ secp_verify_sig!(secp_ctx, &msg_hash, &msg.bitcoin_signature_2, &msg.contents.bitcoin_key_2);
+ self.update_channel_from_unsigned_announcement_intern(&msg.contents, Some(msg), chain_access)
+ }
+
+ /// Store or update channel info from a channel announcement without verifying the associated
+ /// signatures. Because we aren't given the associated signatures here we cannot relay the
+ /// channel announcement to any of our peers.
+ ///
+ /// If a `chain::Access` object is provided via `chain_access`, it will be called to verify
+ /// the corresponding UTXO exists on chain and is correctly-formatted.
+ pub fn update_channel_from_unsigned_announcement<C: Deref>
+ (&mut self, msg: &msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, chain_access: &Option<C>)
+ -> Result<(), LightningError>
+ where C::Target: chain::Access {
+ self.update_channel_from_unsigned_announcement_intern(msg, None, chain_access)
+ }
+
+ fn update_channel_from_unsigned_announcement_intern<C: Deref>
+ (&mut self, msg: &msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, full_msg: Option<&msgs::ChannelAnnouncement>, chain_access: &Option<C>)
+ -> Result<(), LightningError>
+ where C::Target: chain::Access {
+ if msg.node_id_1 == msg.node_id_2 || msg.bitcoin_key_1 == msg.bitcoin_key_2 {
+ return Err(LightningError{err: "Channel announcement node had a channel with itself".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
- let should_relay = msg.contents.excess_data.is_empty();
+ let utxo_value = match &chain_access {
+ &None => {
+ // Tentatively accept, potentially exposing us to DoS attacks
+ None
+ },
+ &Some(ref chain_access) => {
+ match chain_access.get_utxo(&msg.chain_hash, msg.short_channel_id) {
+ Ok(TxOut { value, script_pubkey }) => {
+ let expected_script = Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_PUSHNUM_2)
+ .push_slice(&msg.bitcoin_key_1.serialize())
+ .push_slice(&msg.bitcoin_key_2.serialize())
+ .push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_PUSHNUM_2)
+ .push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_CHECKMULTISIG).into_script().to_v0_p2wsh();
+ if script_pubkey != expected_script {
+ return Err(LightningError{err: format!("Channel announcement key ({}) didn't match on-chain script ({})", script_pubkey.to_hex(), expected_script.to_hex()), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
+ }
+ //TODO: Check if value is worth storing, use it to inform routing, and compare it
+ //to the new HTLC max field in channel_update
+ Some(value)
+ },
+ Err(chain::AccessError::UnknownChain) => {
+ return Err(LightningError{err: format!("Channel announced on an unknown chain ({})", msg.chain_hash.encode().to_hex()), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
+ },
+ Err(chain::AccessError::UnknownTx) => {
+ return Err(LightningError{err: "Channel announced without corresponding UTXO entry".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
+ },
+ }
+ },
+ };
let chan_info = ChannelInfo {
- features: msg.contents.features.clone(),
- node_one: msg.contents.node_id_1.clone(),
+ features: msg.features.clone(),
+ node_one: msg.node_id_1.clone(),
one_to_two: None,
- node_two: msg.contents.node_id_2.clone(),
+ node_two: msg.node_id_2.clone(),
two_to_one: None,
capacity_sats: utxo_value,
- announcement_message: if should_relay { Some(msg.clone()) } else { None },
+ announcement_message: if msg.excess_data.is_empty() { full_msg.cloned() } else { None },
};
- match self.channels.entry(msg.contents.short_channel_id) {
+ match self.channels.entry(msg.short_channel_id) {
BtreeEntry::Occupied(mut entry) => {
//TODO: because asking the blockchain if short_channel_id is valid is only optional
//in the blockchain API, we need to handle it smartly here, though it's unclear
// b) we don't track UTXOs of channels we know about and remove them if they
// get reorg'd out.
// c) it's unclear how to do so without exposing ourselves to massive DoS risk.
- Self::remove_channel_in_nodes(&mut self.nodes, &entry.get(), msg.contents.short_channel_id);
+ Self::remove_channel_in_nodes(&mut self.nodes, &entry.get(), msg.short_channel_id);
*entry.get_mut() = chan_info;
} else {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Already have knowledge of channel".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError})
( $node_id: expr ) => {
match self.nodes.entry($node_id) {
BtreeEntry::Occupied(node_entry) => {
- node_entry.into_mut().channels.push(msg.contents.short_channel_id);
+ node_entry.into_mut().channels.push(msg.short_channel_id);
},
BtreeEntry::Vacant(node_entry) => {
node_entry.insert(NodeInfo {
- channels: vec!(msg.contents.short_channel_id),
+ channels: vec!(msg.short_channel_id),
lowest_inbound_channel_fees: None,
announcement_info: None,
});
};
}
- add_channel_to_node!(msg.contents.node_id_1);
- add_channel_to_node!(msg.contents.node_id_2);
+ add_channel_to_node!(msg.node_id_1);
+ add_channel_to_node!(msg.node_id_2);
- Ok(should_relay)
+ Ok(())
}
/// Close a channel if a corresponding HTLC fail was sent.
}
}
- /// For an already known (from announcement) channel, update info about one of the directions of a channel.
- /// Announcement signatures are checked here only if Secp256k1 object is provided.
- fn update_channel(&mut self, msg: &msgs::ChannelUpdate, secp_ctx: Option<&Secp256k1<secp256k1::VerifyOnly>>) -> Result<bool, LightningError> {
+ /// For an already known (from announcement) channel, update info about one of the directions
+ /// of the channel.
+ ///
+ /// You probably don't want to call this directly, instead relying on a NetGraphMsgHandler's
+ /// RoutingMessageHandler implementation to call it indirectly. This may be useful to accept
+ /// routing messages from a source using a protocol other than the lightning P2P protocol.
+ pub fn update_channel<T: secp256k1::Verification>(&mut self, msg: &msgs::ChannelUpdate, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> Result<(), LightningError> {
+ self.update_channel_intern(&msg.contents, Some(&msg), Some((&msg.signature, secp_ctx)))
+ }
+
+ /// For an already known (from announcement) channel, update info about one of the directions
+ /// of the channel without verifying the associated signatures. Because we aren't given the
+ /// associated signatures here we cannot relay the channel update to any of our peers.
+ pub fn update_channel_unsigned(&mut self, msg: &msgs::UnsignedChannelUpdate) -> Result<(), LightningError> {
+ self.update_channel_intern(msg, None, None::<(&secp256k1::Signature, &Secp256k1<secp256k1::VerifyOnly>)>)
+ }
+
+ fn update_channel_intern<T: secp256k1::Verification>(&mut self, msg: &msgs::UnsignedChannelUpdate, full_msg: Option<&msgs::ChannelUpdate>, sig_info: Option<(&secp256k1::Signature, &Secp256k1<T>)>) -> Result<(), LightningError> {
let dest_node_id;
- let chan_enabled = msg.contents.flags & (1 << 1) != (1 << 1);
+ let chan_enabled = msg.flags & (1 << 1) != (1 << 1);
let chan_was_enabled;
- match self.channels.get_mut(&msg.contents.short_channel_id) {
+ match self.channels.get_mut(&msg.short_channel_id) {
None => return Err(LightningError{err: "Couldn't find channel for update".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}),
Some(channel) => {
- if let OptionalField::Present(htlc_maximum_msat) = msg.contents.htlc_maximum_msat {
+ if let OptionalField::Present(htlc_maximum_msat) = msg.htlc_maximum_msat {
if htlc_maximum_msat > MAX_VALUE_MSAT {
return Err(LightningError{err: "htlc_maximum_msat is larger than maximum possible msats".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
macro_rules! maybe_update_channel_info {
( $target: expr, $src_node: expr) => {
if let Some(existing_chan_info) = $target.as_ref() {
- if existing_chan_info.last_update >= msg.contents.timestamp {
+ if existing_chan_info.last_update >= msg.timestamp {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Update older than last processed update".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
chan_was_enabled = existing_chan_info.enabled;
chan_was_enabled = false;
}
- let last_update_message = if msg.contents.excess_data.is_empty() {
- Some(msg.clone())
- } else {
- None
- };
+ let last_update_message = if msg.excess_data.is_empty() { full_msg.cloned() } else { None };
let updated_channel_dir_info = DirectionalChannelInfo {
enabled: chan_enabled,
- last_update: msg.contents.timestamp,
- cltv_expiry_delta: msg.contents.cltv_expiry_delta,
- htlc_minimum_msat: msg.contents.htlc_minimum_msat,
- htlc_maximum_msat: if let OptionalField::Present(max_value) = msg.contents.htlc_maximum_msat { Some(max_value) } else { None },
+ last_update: msg.timestamp,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: msg.cltv_expiry_delta,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: msg.htlc_minimum_msat,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: if let OptionalField::Present(max_value) = msg.htlc_maximum_msat { Some(max_value) } else { None },
fees: RoutingFees {
- base_msat: msg.contents.fee_base_msat,
- proportional_millionths: msg.contents.fee_proportional_millionths,
+ base_msat: msg.fee_base_msat,
+ proportional_millionths: msg.fee_proportional_millionths,
},
last_update_message
};
}
}
- let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
- if msg.contents.flags & 1 == 1 {
+ let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
+ if msg.flags & 1 == 1 {
dest_node_id = channel.node_one.clone();
- if let Some(sig_verifier) = secp_ctx {
- secp_verify_sig!(sig_verifier, &msg_hash, &msg.signature, &channel.node_two);
+ if let Some((sig, ctx)) = sig_info {
+ secp_verify_sig!(ctx, &msg_hash, &sig, &channel.node_two);
}
maybe_update_channel_info!(channel.two_to_one, channel.node_two);
} else {
dest_node_id = channel.node_two.clone();
- if let Some(sig_verifier) = secp_ctx {
- secp_verify_sig!(sig_verifier, &msg_hash, &msg.signature, &channel.node_one);
+ if let Some((sig, ctx)) = sig_info {
+ secp_verify_sig!(ctx, &msg_hash, &sig, &channel.node_one);
}
maybe_update_channel_info!(channel.one_to_two, channel.node_one);
}
if chan_enabled {
let node = self.nodes.get_mut(&dest_node_id).unwrap();
- let mut base_msat = msg.contents.fee_base_msat;
- let mut proportional_millionths = msg.contents.fee_proportional_millionths;
+ let mut base_msat = msg.fee_base_msat;
+ let mut proportional_millionths = msg.fee_proportional_millionths;
if let Some(fees) = node.lowest_inbound_channel_fees {
base_msat = cmp::min(base_msat, fees.base_msat);
proportional_millionths = cmp::min(proportional_millionths, fees.proportional_millionths);
node.lowest_inbound_channel_fees = lowest_inbound_channel_fees;
}
- Ok(msg.contents.excess_data.is_empty())
+ Ok(())
}
fn remove_channel_in_nodes(nodes: &mut BTreeMap<PublicKey, NodeInfo>, chan: &ChannelInfo, short_channel_id: u64) {
use routing::network_graph::{NetGraphMsgHandler, NetworkGraph};
use ln::msgs::{OptionalField, RoutingMessageHandler, UnsignedNodeAnnouncement, NodeAnnouncement,
UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, ChannelAnnouncement, UnsignedChannelUpdate, ChannelUpdate, HTLCFailChannelUpdate,
- MAX_VALUE_MSAT};
+ ReplyChannelRange, ReplyShortChannelIdsEnd, QueryChannelRange, QueryShortChannelIds, MAX_VALUE_MSAT};
use util::test_utils;
use util::logger::Logger;
use util::ser::{Readable, Writeable};
+ use util::events::{MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider};
use bitcoin::hashes::sha256d::Hash as Sha256dHash;
use bitcoin::hashes::Hash;
fn create_net_graph_msg_handler() -> (Secp256k1<All>, NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>) {
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
- let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(None, Arc::clone(&logger));
+ let genesis_hash = genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash();
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(genesis_hash, None, Arc::clone(&logger));
(secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler)
}
};
// Test if the UTXO lookups were not supported
- let mut net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(None, Arc::clone(&logger));
+ let mut net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
match net_graph_msg_handler.handle_channel_announcement(&valid_announcement) {
Ok(res) => assert!(res),
_ => panic!()
// Test if an associated transaction were not on-chain (or not confirmed).
let chain_source = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet));
*chain_source.utxo_ret.lock().unwrap() = Err(chain::AccessError::UnknownTx);
- net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Some(chain_source.clone()), Arc::clone(&logger));
+ net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(chain_source.clone().genesis_hash, Some(chain_source.clone()), Arc::clone(&logger));
unsigned_announcement.short_channel_id += 1;
msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
unsigned_announcement.node_id_1 = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_2_privkey);
msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
let channel_to_itself_announcement = ChannelAnnouncement {
- node_signature_1: secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, node_1_privkey),
- node_signature_2: secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, node_1_privkey),
+ node_signature_1: secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, node_2_privkey),
+ node_signature_2: secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, node_2_privkey),
bitcoin_signature_1: secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, node_1_btckey),
bitcoin_signature_2: secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, node_2_btckey),
contents: unsigned_announcement.clone(),
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let logger: Arc<Logger> = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
let chain_source = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet));
- let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Some(chain_source.clone()), Arc::clone(&logger));
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(), Some(chain_source.clone()), Arc::clone(&logger));
let node_1_privkey = &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
let node_2_privkey = &SecretKey::from_slice(&[41; 32]).unwrap();
network.write(&mut w).unwrap();
assert!(<NetworkGraph>::read(&mut ::std::io::Cursor::new(&w.0)).unwrap() == *network);
}
+
+ #[test]
+ fn sending_query_channel_range() {
+ let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler) = create_net_graph_msg_handler();
+ let node_privkey_1 = &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
+ let node_privkey_2 = &SecretKey::from_slice(&[41; 32]).unwrap();
+ let node_id_1 = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_privkey_1);
+ let node_id_2 = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_privkey_2);
+
+ let chain_hash = genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash();
+ let first_blocknum = 0;
+ let number_of_blocks = 0xffff_ffff;
+
+ // When no active query exists for the node, it should send a query message and generate a task
+ {
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_channel_range(&node_id_1, chain_hash, first_blocknum, number_of_blocks);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // It should create a task for the query
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().contains_key(&node_id_1));
+
+ // It should send a query_channel_range message with the correct information
+ let events = net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match &events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendChannelRangeQuery{ node_id, msg } => {
+ assert_eq!(node_id, &node_id_1);
+ assert_eq!(msg.chain_hash, chain_hash);
+ assert_eq!(msg.first_blocknum, first_blocknum);
+ assert_eq!(msg.number_of_blocks, number_of_blocks);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Expected MessageSendEvent::SendChannelRangeQuery")
+ };
+ }
+
+ // When an active query exists for the node, when there is a subsequent query request, it
+ // should fail to initiate a new query
+ {
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_channel_range(&node_id_1, chain_hash, first_blocknum, number_of_blocks);
+ assert_eq!(result.is_err(), true);
+ }
+
+ // When no active query exists for a different node, it should send a query message
+ {
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_channel_range(&node_id_2, chain_hash, first_blocknum, number_of_blocks);
+ assert_eq!(result.is_ok(), true);
+
+ // It should create a task for the query
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().contains_key(&node_id_2));
+
+ // It should send a query_channel_message with the correct information
+ let events = net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match &events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendChannelRangeQuery{ node_id, msg } => {
+ assert_eq!(node_id, &node_id_2);
+ assert_eq!(msg.chain_hash, chain_hash);
+ assert_eq!(msg.first_blocknum, first_blocknum);
+ assert_eq!(msg.number_of_blocks, number_of_blocks);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Expected MessageSendEvent::SendChannelRangeQuery")
+ };
+ }
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn sending_query_short_channel_ids() {
+ let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler) = create_net_graph_msg_handler();
+ let node_privkey_1 = &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
+ let node_id_1 = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_privkey_1);
+
+ let chain_hash = genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash();
+
+ // The first query should send the batch of scids to the peer
+ {
+ let short_channel_ids: Vec<u64> = vec![0, 1, 2];
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_short_channel_ids(&node_id_1, chain_hash, short_channel_ids.clone());
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Validate that we have enqueued a send message event and that it contains the correct information
+ let events = net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match &events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery{ node_id, msg } => {
+ assert_eq!(node_id, &node_id_1);
+ assert_eq!(msg.chain_hash, chain_hash);
+ assert_eq!(msg.short_channel_ids, short_channel_ids);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Expected MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery")
+ };
+ }
+
+ // Subsequent queries for scids should enqueue them to be sent in the next batch which will
+ // be sent when a reply_short_channel_ids_end message is handled.
+ {
+ let short_channel_ids: Vec<u64> = vec![3, 4, 5];
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_short_channel_ids(&node_id_1, chain_hash, short_channel_ids.clone());
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Validate that we have not enqueued another send message event yet
+ let events = net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 0);
+
+ // Validate the task has the queued scids
+ assert_eq!(
+ net_graph_msg_handler.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().get(&node_id_1).unwrap().short_channel_ids,
+ short_channel_ids
+ );
+ }
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn handling_reply_channel_range() {
+ let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler) = create_net_graph_msg_handler();
+ let node_privkey_1 = &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
+ let node_id_1 = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_privkey_1);
+
+ let chain_hash = genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash();
+
+ // Test receipt of an unknown reply message. We expect an error
+ {
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: 1000,
+ number_of_blocks: 1050,
+ short_channel_ids: vec![
+ 0x0003e8_000000_0000, // 1000x0x0
+ 0x0003e9_000000_0000, // 1001x0x0
+ 0x0003f0_000000_0000 // 1008x0x0
+ ],
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_err());
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of a single reply_channel_range that exactly matches the queried range.
+ // It sends a query_short_channel_ids with the returned scids and removes the pending task
+ {
+ // Initiate a channel range query to create a query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_channel_range(&node_id_1, chain_hash, 1000, 100);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Clear the SendRangeQuery event
+ net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+
+ // Handle a single successful reply that matches the queried channel range
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: 1000,
+ number_of_blocks: 100,
+ short_channel_ids: vec![
+ 0x0003e8_000000_0000, // 1000x0x0
+ 0x0003e9_000000_0000, // 1001x0x0
+ 0x0003f0_000000_0000 // 1008x0x0
+ ],
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // The query is now complete, so we expect the task to be removed
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+
+ // We expect to emit a query_short_channel_ids message with scids in our query range
+ let events = net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match &events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery { node_id, msg } => {
+ assert_eq!(node_id, &node_id_1);
+ assert_eq!(msg.chain_hash, chain_hash);
+ assert_eq!(msg.short_channel_ids, vec![0x0003e8_000000_0000,0x0003e9_000000_0000,0x0003f0_000000_0000]);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery"),
+ }
+
+ // Clean up scid_task
+ net_graph_msg_handler.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().clear();
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of a single reply_channel_range for a query that has a u32 overflow. We expect
+ // it sends a query_short_channel_ids with the returned scids and removes the pending task.
+ {
+ // Initiate a channel range query to create a query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_channel_range(&node_id_1, chain_hash, 1000, 0xffff_ffff);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Clear the SendRangeQuery event
+ net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+
+ // Handle a single successful reply that matches the queried channel range
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: 1000,
+ number_of_blocks: 0xffff_ffff,
+ short_channel_ids: vec![
+ 0x0003e8_000000_0000, // 1000x0x0
+ 0x0003e9_000000_0000, // 1001x0x0
+ 0x0003f0_000000_0000 // 1008x0x0
+ ],
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // The query is now complete, so we expect the task to be removed
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+
+ // We expect to emit a query_short_channel_ids message with scids in our query range
+ let events = net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match &events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery { node_id, msg } => {
+ assert_eq!(node_id, &node_id_1);
+ assert_eq!(msg.chain_hash, chain_hash);
+ assert_eq!(msg.short_channel_ids, vec![0x0003e8_000000_0000,0x0003e9_000000_0000,0x0003f0_000000_0000]);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery"),
+ }
+
+ // Clean up scid_task
+ net_graph_msg_handler.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().clear();
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of a single reply that encompasses the queried channel range. This is allowed
+ // since a reply must contain at least part of the query range. Receipt of the reply should
+ // send a query_short_channel_ids message with scids filtered to the query range and remove
+ // the pending task.
+ {
+ // Initiate a channel range query to create a query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_channel_range(&node_id_1, chain_hash, 1000, 100);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Clear the SendRangeQuery event
+ net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+
+ // Handle a single successful reply that encompasses the queried channel range
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: 0,
+ number_of_blocks: 2000,
+ short_channel_ids: vec![
+ 0x0003e0_000000_0000, // 992x0x0
+ 0x0003e8_000000_0000, // 1000x0x0
+ 0x0003e9_000000_0000, // 1001x0x0
+ 0x0003f0_000000_0000, // 1008x0x0
+ 0x00044c_000000_0000, // 1100x0x0
+ 0x0006e0_000000_0000, // 1760x0x0
+ ],
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // The query is now complete, so we expect the task to be removed
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+
+ // We expect to emit a query_short_channel_ids message with scids filtered to those
+ // within the original query range.
+ let events = net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match &events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery { node_id, msg } => {
+ assert_eq!(node_id, &node_id_1);
+ assert_eq!(msg.chain_hash, chain_hash);
+ assert_eq!(msg.short_channel_ids, vec![0x0003e8_000000_0000,0x0003e9_000000_0000,0x0003f0_000000_0000]);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery"),
+ }
+
+ // Clean up scid_task
+ net_graph_msg_handler.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().clear();
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of multiple reply messages for a single query. This happens when the number
+ // of scids in the query range exceeds the size limits of a single reply message. We expect
+ // to initiate a query_short_channel_ids for the first batch of scids and we enqueue the
+ // remaining scids for later processing. We remove the range query task after receipt of all
+ // reply messages.
+ {
+ // Initiate a channel range query to create a query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_channel_range(&node_id_1, chain_hash, 1000, 100);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Clear the SendRangeQuery event
+ net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+
+ // Handle the first reply message
+ let reply_1_scids = vec![
+ 0x0003e8_000000_0000, // 1000x0x0
+ 0x0003e9_000000_0000, // 1001x0x0
+ 0x000419_000000_0000, // 1049x0x0
+ ];
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: 1000,
+ number_of_blocks: 50,
+ short_channel_ids: reply_1_scids.clone(),
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Handle the next reply in the sequence, which must start at the previous message's
+ // first_blocknum plus number_of_blocks. The scids in this reply will be queued.
+ let reply_2_scids = vec![
+ 0x00041a_000000_0000, // 1050x0x0
+ 0x000432_000000_0000, // 1074x0x0
+ ];
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: 1050,
+ number_of_blocks: 25,
+ short_channel_ids: reply_2_scids.clone(),
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Handle the final reply in the sequence, which must meet or exceed the initial query's
+ // first_blocknum plus number_of_blocks. The scids in this reply will be queued.
+ let reply_3_scids = vec![
+ 0x000433_000000_0000, // 1075x0x0
+ 0x00044b_000000_0000, // 1099x0x0
+ ];
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: 1075,
+ number_of_blocks: 25,
+ short_channel_ids: reply_3_scids.clone(),
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // After the final reply we expect the query task to be removed
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+
+ // We expect to emit a query_short_channel_ids message with the accumulated scids that
+ // match the queried channel range.
+ let events = net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match &events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery { node_id, msg } => {
+ assert_eq!(node_id, &node_id_1);
+ assert_eq!(msg.chain_hash, chain_hash);
+ assert_eq!(msg.short_channel_ids, [reply_1_scids, reply_2_scids, reply_3_scids].concat());
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery"),
+ }
+
+ // Clean up scid_task
+ net_graph_msg_handler.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().clear();
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of a sequence of replies with a valid first reply and a second reply that
+ // resumes on the same block as the first reply. The spec requires a subsequent
+ // first_blocknum to equal the prior first_blocknum plus number_of_blocks, however
+ // due to discrepancies in implementation we must loosen this restriction.
+ {
+ // Initiate a channel range query to create a query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_channel_range(&node_id_1, chain_hash, 1000, 100);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Clear the SendRangeQuery event
+ net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+
+ // Handle the first reply message
+ let reply_1_scids = vec![
+ 0x0003e8_000000_0000, // 1000x0x0
+ 0x0003e9_000000_0000, // 1001x0x0
+ 0x000419_000000_0000, // 1049x0x0
+ ];
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: 1000,
+ number_of_blocks: 50,
+ short_channel_ids: reply_1_scids.clone(),
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Handle the next reply in the sequence, which is non-spec but resumes on the last block
+ // of the first message.
+ let reply_2_scids = vec![
+ 0x000419_000001_0000, // 1049x1x0
+ 0x00041a_000000_0000, // 1050x0x0
+ 0x000432_000000_0000, // 1074x0x0
+ ];
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: 1049,
+ number_of_blocks: 51,
+ short_channel_ids: reply_2_scids.clone(),
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // After the final reply we expect the query task to be removed
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+
+ // We expect to emit a query_short_channel_ids message with the accumulated scids that
+ // match the queried channel range
+ let events = net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match &events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery { node_id, msg } => {
+ assert_eq!(node_id, &node_id_1);
+ assert_eq!(msg.chain_hash, chain_hash);
+ assert_eq!(msg.short_channel_ids, [reply_1_scids, reply_2_scids].concat());
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery"),
+ }
+
+ // Clean up scid_task
+ net_graph_msg_handler.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().clear();
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of reply with a chain_hash that does not match the query. We expect to return
+ // an error and to remove the query task.
+ {
+ // Initiate a channel range query to create a query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_channel_range(&node_id_1, chain_hash, 1000, 100);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Clear the SendRangeQuery event
+ net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+
+ // Handle the reply with a mismatched chain_hash. We expect IgnoreError result and the
+ // task should be removed.
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Bitcoin).header.block_hash(),
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: 1000,
+ number_of_blocks: 1050,
+ short_channel_ids: vec![0x0003e8_000000_0000,0x0003e9_000000_0000,0x0003f0_000000_0000],
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_err());
+ assert_eq!(result.err().unwrap().err, "Received reply_channel_range with invalid chain_hash");
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of a reply that indicates the remote node does not maintain up-to-date
+ // information for the chain_hash. Because of discrepancies in implementation we use
+ // full_information=false and short_channel_ids=[] as the signal. We should expect an error
+ // and the task should be removed.
+ {
+ // Initiate a channel range query to create a query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_channel_range(&node_id_1, chain_hash, 1000, 100);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Clear the SendRangeQuery event
+ net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+
+ // Handle the reply indicating the peer was unable to fulfill our request.
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: false,
+ first_blocknum: 1000,
+ number_of_blocks: 100,
+ short_channel_ids: vec![],
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_err());
+ assert_eq!(result.err().unwrap().err, "Received reply_channel_range with no information available");
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of a reply that has a first_blocknum that is above the first_blocknum
+ // requested in our query. The reply must contain the queried block range. We expect an
+ // error result and the task should be removed.
+ {
+ // Initiate a channel range query to create a query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_channel_range(&node_id_1, chain_hash, 1000, 100);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Clear the SendRangeQuery event
+ net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+
+ // Handle the reply that has a first_blocknum above the query's first_blocknum
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: 1001,
+ number_of_blocks: 100,
+ short_channel_ids: vec![],
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_err());
+ assert_eq!(result.err().unwrap().err, "Failing reply_channel_range with invalid first_blocknum");
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of a first reply that does not overlap the query range at all. The first message
+ // must have some overlap with the query. We expect an error result and the task should
+ // be removed.
+ {
+ // Initiate a channel range query to create a query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_channel_range(&node_id_1, chain_hash, 1000, 100);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Clear the SendRangeQuery event
+ net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+
+ // Handle a reply that contains a block range that precedes the queried block range
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: 0,
+ number_of_blocks: 1000,
+ short_channel_ids: vec![],
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_err());
+ assert_eq!(result.err().unwrap().err, "Failing reply_channel_range with non-overlapping first reply");
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of a sequence of replies with a valid first reply and a second reply that is
+ // non-sequential. The spec requires a subsequent first_blocknum to equal the prior
+ // first_blocknum plus number_of_blocks. We expect an IgnoreError result and the task should
+ // be removed.
+ {
+ // Initiate a channel range query to create a query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_channel_range(&node_id_1, chain_hash, 1000, 100);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Clear the SendRangeQuery event
+ net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+
+ // Handle the first reply
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: 1000,
+ number_of_blocks: 50,
+ short_channel_ids: vec![0x0003e8_000000_0000,0x0003e9_000000_0000,0x0003f0_000000_0000],
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Handle the second reply which does not start at the proper first_blocknum. We expect
+ // to return an error and remove the task.
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: 1051,
+ number_of_blocks: 50,
+ short_channel_ids: vec![0x0003f1_000000_0000,0x0003f2_000000_0000],
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_err());
+ assert_eq!(result.err().unwrap().err, "Failing reply_channel_range with invalid sequence");
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of too many reply messages. We expect an IgnoreError result and the task should
+ // be removed.
+ {
+ // Initiate a channel range query to create a query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_channel_range(&node_id_1, chain_hash, 1000, 0xffff_ffff);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Clear the SendRangeQuery event
+ net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+
+ // Handle a sequence of replies that will fail once the max number of reply has been exceeded.
+ for block in 1000..=1000 + super::MAX_REPLY_CHANNEL_RANGE_PER_QUERY + 10 {
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&node_id_1, &ReplyChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ first_blocknum: block as u32,
+ number_of_blocks: 1,
+ short_channel_ids: vec![(block as u64) << 40],
+ });
+ if block <= 1000 + super::MAX_REPLY_CHANNEL_RANGE_PER_QUERY {
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+ } else if block == 1001 + super::MAX_REPLY_CHANNEL_RANGE_PER_QUERY {
+ assert!(result.is_err());
+ assert_eq!(result.err().unwrap().err, "Failing reply_channel_range due to excessive messages");
+ } else {
+ assert!(result.is_err());
+ assert_eq!(result.err().unwrap().err, "Received unknown reply_channel_range message");
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Expect the task to be removed
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.chan_range_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+ }
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn handling_reply_short_channel_ids() {
+ let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler) = create_net_graph_msg_handler();
+ let node_privkey = &SecretKey::from_slice(&[41; 32]).unwrap();
+ let node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_privkey);
+
+ let chain_hash = genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash();
+
+ // Test receipt of a reply when no query exists. We expect an error to be returned
+ {
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_short_channel_ids_end(&node_id, &ReplyShortChannelIdsEnd {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_err());
+ assert_eq!(result.err().unwrap().err, "Unknown reply_short_channel_ids_end message");
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of a reply that is for a different chain_hash. We expect an error and the task
+ // should be removed.
+ {
+ // Initiate a query to create a pending query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_short_channel_ids(&node_id, chain_hash, vec![0x0003e8_000000_0000]);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Process reply with incorrect chain_hash
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_short_channel_ids_end(&node_id, &ReplyShortChannelIdsEnd {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Bitcoin).header.block_hash(),
+ full_information: true,
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_err());
+ assert_eq!(result.err().unwrap().err, "Received reply_short_channel_ids_end with incorrect chain_hash");
+
+ // Expect the task to be removed
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of a reply that indicates the peer does not maintain up-to-date information
+ // for the chain_hash requested in the query. We expect an error and task should be removed.
+ {
+ // Initiate a query to create a pending query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_short_channel_ids(&node_id, chain_hash, vec![0x0003e8_000000_0000]);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Process failed reply
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_short_channel_ids_end(&node_id, &ReplyShortChannelIdsEnd {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: false,
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_err());
+ assert_eq!(result.err().unwrap().err, "Received reply_short_channel_ids_end with no information");
+
+ // Expect the task to be removed
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of a successful reply when there are no additional scids to query. We expect
+ // the task to be removed.
+ {
+ // Initiate a query to create a pending query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_short_channel_ids(&node_id, chain_hash, vec![0x0003e8_000000_0000]);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Process success reply
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_short_channel_ids_end(&node_id, &ReplyShortChannelIdsEnd {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Expect the task to be removed
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+ }
+
+ // Test receipt of a successful reply when there are additional scids to query. We expect
+ // additional queries to be sent until the task can be removed.
+ {
+ // Initiate a query to create a pending query task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_short_channel_ids(&node_id, chain_hash, vec![0x0003e8_000000_0000]);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // Initiate a second query to add pending scids to the task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_short_channel_ids(&node_id, chain_hash, vec![0x0003e9_000000_0000]);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+ assert_eq!(net_graph_msg_handler.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().get(&node_id).unwrap().short_channel_ids, vec![0x0003e9_000000_0000]);
+
+ // Initiate a third query to add pending scids to the task
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.query_short_channel_ids(&node_id, chain_hash, vec![0x0003f0_000000_0000]);
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+ assert_eq!(net_graph_msg_handler.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().get(&node_id).unwrap().short_channel_ids, vec![0x0003e9_000000_0000, 0x0003f0_000000_0000]);
+
+ // Clear all of the pending send events
+ net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+
+ // Handle the first successful reply, which will send the next batch of scids in a new query
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_short_channel_ids_end(&node_id, &ReplyShortChannelIdsEnd {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // We expect the second batch to be sent in an event
+ let expected_node_id = &node_id;
+ let events = net_graph_msg_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match &events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery { node_id, msg } => {
+ assert_eq!(node_id, expected_node_id);
+ assert_eq!(msg.chain_hash, chain_hash);
+ assert_eq!(msg.short_channel_ids, vec![0x0003e9_000000_0000, 0x0003f0_000000_0000]);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected MessageSendEvent::SendShortIdsQuery"),
+ }
+
+ // We expect the scids to be cleared from the task
+ assert_eq!(net_graph_msg_handler.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().get(&node_id).unwrap().short_channel_ids.len(), 0);
+
+ // Handle the second successful reply
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_reply_short_channel_ids_end(&node_id, &ReplyShortChannelIdsEnd {
+ chain_hash,
+ full_information: true,
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+
+ // We expect the task should be removed
+ assert!(net_graph_msg_handler.scid_query_tasks.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+ }
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn handling_query_channel_range() {
+ let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler) = create_net_graph_msg_handler();
+ let node_privkey = &SecretKey::from_slice(&[41; 32]).unwrap();
+ let node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_privkey);
+
+ let chain_hash = genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash();
+
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_query_channel_range(&node_id, &QueryChannelRange {
+ chain_hash,
+ first_blocknum: 0,
+ number_of_blocks: 0xffff_ffff,
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_err());
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn handling_query_short_channel_ids() {
+ let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler) = create_net_graph_msg_handler();
+ let node_privkey = &SecretKey::from_slice(&[41; 32]).unwrap();
+ let node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_privkey);
+
+ let chain_hash = genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash();
+
+ let result = net_graph_msg_handler.handle_query_short_channel_ids(&node_id, &QueryShortChannelIds {
+ chain_hash,
+ short_channel_ids: vec![0x0003e8_000000_0000],
+ });
+ assert!(result.is_err());
+ }
}