ShutdownScript::new_p2wpkh(&pubkey_hash)
}
- fn get_channel_signer(&self, _inbound: bool, channel_value_satoshis: u64) -> EnforcingSigner {
+ fn generate_channel_keys_id(&self, _inbound: bool, _channel_value_satoshis: u64, _user_channel_id: u128) -> [u8; 32] {
+ let id = self.rand_bytes_id.fetch_add(1, atomic::Ordering::Relaxed) as u8;
+ [id; 32]
+ }
+
+ fn derive_channel_signer(&self, channel_value_satoshis: u64, channel_keys_id: [u8; 32]) -> Self::Signer {
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::signing_only();
- let id = self.rand_bytes_id.fetch_add(1, atomic::Ordering::Relaxed);
+ let id = channel_keys_id[0];
let keys = InMemorySigner::new(
&secp_ctx,
self.get_node_secret(Recipient::Node).unwrap(),
SecretKey::from_slice(&[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6, self.node_id]).unwrap(),
SecretKey::from_slice(&[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 7, self.node_id]).unwrap(),
SecretKey::from_slice(&[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 8, self.node_id]).unwrap(),
- [id as u8, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9, self.node_id],
+ [id, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9, self.node_id],
channel_value_satoshis,
- [0; 32],
+ channel_keys_id,
);
let revoked_commitment = self.make_enforcement_state_cell(keys.commitment_seed);
EnforcingSigner::new_with_revoked(keys, revoked_commitment, false)
let mut events = nodes[$node].get_and_clear_pending_events();
// Sort events so that PendingHTLCsForwardable get processed last. This avoids a
// case where we first process a PendingHTLCsForwardable, then claim/fail on a
- // PaymentReceived, claiming/failing two HTLCs, but leaving a just-generated
- // PaymentReceived event for the second HTLC in our pending_events (and breaking
+ // PaymentClaimable, claiming/failing two HTLCs, but leaving a just-generated
+ // PaymentClaimable event for the second HTLC in our pending_events (and breaking
// our claim_set deduplication).
events.sort_by(|a, b| {
- if let events::Event::PaymentReceived { .. } = a {
+ if let events::Event::PaymentClaimable { .. } = a {
if let events::Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } = b {
Ordering::Less
} else { Ordering::Equal }
} else if let events::Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } = a {
- if let events::Event::PaymentReceived { .. } = b {
+ if let events::Event::PaymentClaimable { .. } = b {
Ordering::Greater
} else { Ordering::Equal }
} else { Ordering::Equal }
let had_events = !events.is_empty();
for event in events.drain(..) {
match event {
- events::Event::PaymentReceived { payment_hash, .. } => {
+ events::Event::PaymentClaimable { payment_hash, .. } => {
if claim_set.insert(payment_hash.0) {
if $fail {
nodes[$node].fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash);