//! ChannelMonitors to get out of the HSM and onto monitoring devices.
use bitcoin::blockdata::block::BlockHeader;
-use bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::{TxOut,Transaction};
+use bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::{OutPoint as BitcoinOutPoint, TxOut, Transaction};
use bitcoin::blockdata::script::{Script, Builder};
use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes;
use bitcoin::secp256k1::{SecretKey, PublicKey};
use bitcoin::secp256k1;
-use ln::{PaymentHash, PaymentPreimage};
-use ln::msgs::DecodeError;
-use ln::chan_utils;
-use ln::chan_utils::{CounterpartyCommitmentSecrets, HTLCOutputInCommitment, HTLCType, ChannelTransactionParameters, HolderCommitmentTransaction};
-use ln::channelmanager::HTLCSource;
-use chain;
-use chain::{BestBlock, WatchedOutput};
-use chain::chaininterface::{BroadcasterInterface, FeeEstimator, LowerBoundedFeeEstimator};
-use chain::transaction::{OutPoint, TransactionData};
-use chain::keysinterface::{SpendableOutputDescriptor, StaticPaymentOutputDescriptor, DelayedPaymentOutputDescriptor, Sign, KeysInterface};
-use chain::onchaintx::OnchainTxHandler;
-use chain::package::{CounterpartyOfferedHTLCOutput, CounterpartyReceivedHTLCOutput, HolderFundingOutput, HolderHTLCOutput, PackageSolvingData, PackageTemplate, RevokedOutput, RevokedHTLCOutput};
-use chain::Filter;
-use util::logger::Logger;
-use util::ser::{Readable, ReadableArgs, MaybeReadable, Writer, Writeable, U48, OptionDeserWrapper};
-use util::byte_utils;
-use util::events::Event;
-
-use prelude::*;
+use crate::ln::{PaymentHash, PaymentPreimage};
+use crate::ln::msgs::DecodeError;
+use crate::ln::chan_utils;
+use crate::ln::chan_utils::{CounterpartyCommitmentSecrets, HTLCOutputInCommitment, HTLCClaim, ChannelTransactionParameters, HolderCommitmentTransaction};
+use crate::ln::channelmanager::HTLCSource;
+use crate::chain;
+use crate::chain::{BestBlock, WatchedOutput};
+use crate::chain::chaininterface::{BroadcasterInterface, FeeEstimator, LowerBoundedFeeEstimator};
+use crate::chain::transaction::{OutPoint, TransactionData};
+use crate::chain::keysinterface::{SpendableOutputDescriptor, StaticPaymentOutputDescriptor, DelayedPaymentOutputDescriptor, Sign, SignerProvider, EntropySource};
+#[cfg(anchors)]
+use crate::chain::onchaintx::ClaimEvent;
+use crate::chain::onchaintx::OnchainTxHandler;
+use crate::chain::package::{CounterpartyOfferedHTLCOutput, CounterpartyReceivedHTLCOutput, HolderFundingOutput, HolderHTLCOutput, PackageSolvingData, PackageTemplate, RevokedOutput, RevokedHTLCOutput};
+use crate::chain::Filter;
+use crate::util::logger::Logger;
+use crate::util::ser::{Readable, ReadableArgs, MaybeReadable, Writer, Writeable, U48, OptionDeserWrapper};
+use crate::util::byte_utils;
+use crate::util::events::Event;
+#[cfg(anchors)]
+use crate::util::events::{AnchorDescriptor, HTLCDescriptor, BumpTransactionEvent};
+
+use crate::prelude::*;
use core::{cmp, mem};
-use io::{self, Error};
+use crate::io::{self, Error};
+use core::convert::TryInto;
use core::ops::Deref;
-use sync::Mutex;
+use crate::sync::Mutex;
-/// An update generated by the underlying Channel itself which contains some new information the
-/// ChannelMonitor should be made aware of.
-#[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq))]
+/// An update generated by the underlying channel itself which contains some new information the
+/// [`ChannelMonitor`] should be made aware of.
+///
+/// Because this represents only a small number of updates to the underlying state, it is generally
+/// much smaller than a full [`ChannelMonitor`]. However, for large single commitment transaction
+/// updates (e.g. ones during which there are hundreds of HTLCs pending on the commitment
+/// transaction), a single update may reach upwards of 1 MiB in serialized size.
+#[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq, Eq))]
#[derive(Clone)]
#[must_use]
pub struct ChannelMonitorUpdate {
/// increasing and increase by one for each new update, with one exception specified below.
///
/// This sequence number is also used to track up to which points updates which returned
- /// ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::TemporaryFailure have been applied to all copies of a given
+ /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress`] have been applied to all copies of a given
/// ChannelMonitor when ChannelManager::channel_monitor_updated is called.
///
/// The only instance where update_id values are not strictly increasing is the case where we
/// allow post-force-close updates with a special update ID of [`CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID`]. See
/// its docs for more details.
+ ///
+ /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress`]: super::ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress
pub update_id: u64,
}
}
/// An event to be processed by the ChannelManager.
-#[derive(Clone, PartialEq)]
+#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub enum MonitorEvent {
/// A monitor event containing an HTLCUpdate.
HTLCEvent(HTLCUpdate),
CommitmentTxConfirmed(OutPoint),
/// Indicates a [`ChannelMonitor`] update has completed. See
- /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::TemporaryFailure`] for more information on how this is used.
+ /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress`] for more information on how this is used.
///
- /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::TemporaryFailure`]: super::ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::TemporaryFailure
- UpdateCompleted {
+ /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress`]: super::ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress
+ Completed {
/// The funding outpoint of the [`ChannelMonitor`] that was updated
funding_txo: OutPoint,
/// The Update ID from [`ChannelMonitorUpdate::update_id`] which was applied or
},
/// Indicates a [`ChannelMonitor`] update has failed. See
- /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::PermanentFailure`] for more information on how this is used.
+ /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure`] for more information on how this is used.
///
- /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::PermanentFailure`]: super::ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::PermanentFailure
+ /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure`]: super::ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure
UpdateFailed(OutPoint),
}
impl_writeable_tlv_based_enum_upgradable!(MonitorEvent,
- // Note that UpdateCompleted and UpdateFailed are currently never serialized to disk as they are
+ // Note that Completed and UpdateFailed are currently never serialized to disk as they are
// generated only in ChainMonitor
- (0, UpdateCompleted) => {
+ (0, Completed) => {
(0, funding_txo, required),
(2, monitor_update_id, required),
},
/// Simple structure sent back by `chain::Watch` when an HTLC from a forward channel is detected on
/// chain. Used to update the corresponding HTLC in the backward channel. Failing to pass the
/// preimage claim backward will lead to loss of funds.
-#[derive(Clone, PartialEq)]
+#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct HTLCUpdate {
pub(crate) payment_hash: PaymentHash,
pub(crate) payment_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>,
pub(crate) const HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER: u32 = CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS;
// TODO(devrandom) replace this with HolderCommitmentTransaction
-#[derive(Clone, PartialEq)]
+#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
struct HolderSignedTx {
/// txid of the transaction in tx, just used to make comparison faster
txid: Txid,
(14, htlc_outputs, vec_type)
});
+#[cfg(anchors)]
+impl HolderSignedTx {
+ fn non_dust_htlcs(&self) -> Vec<HTLCOutputInCommitment> {
+ self.htlc_outputs.iter().filter_map(|(htlc, _, _)| {
+ if let Some(_) = htlc.transaction_output_index {
+ Some(htlc.clone())
+ } else {
+ None
+ }
+ })
+ .collect()
+ }
+}
+
/// We use this to track static counterparty commitment transaction data and to generate any
/// justice or 2nd-stage preimage/timeout transactions.
-#[derive(PartialEq)]
+#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
struct CounterpartyCommitmentParameters {
counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key: PublicKey,
counterparty_htlc_base_key: PublicKey,
impl Writeable for CounterpartyCommitmentParameters {
fn write<W: Writer>(&self, w: &mut W) -> Result<(), io::Error> {
- w.write_all(&byte_utils::be64_to_array(0))?;
+ w.write_all(&(0 as u64).to_be_bytes())?;
write_tlv_fields!(w, {
(0, self.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key, required),
(2, self.counterparty_htlc_base_key, required),
}
}
-/// An entry for an [`OnchainEvent`], stating the block height when the event was observed and the
-/// transaction causing it.
+/// An entry for an [`OnchainEvent`], stating the block height and hash when the event was
+/// observed, as well as the transaction causing it.
///
/// Used to determine when the on-chain event can be considered safe from a chain reorganization.
-#[derive(PartialEq)]
+#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
struct OnchainEventEntry {
txid: Txid,
height: u32,
+ block_hash: Option<BlockHash>, // Added as optional, will be filled in for any entry generated on 0.0.113 or after
event: OnchainEvent,
+ transaction: Option<Transaction>, // Added as optional, but always filled in, in LDK 0.0.110
}
impl OnchainEventEntry {
}
}
+/// The (output index, sats value) for the counterparty's output in a commitment transaction.
+///
+/// This was added as an `Option` in 0.0.110.
+type CommitmentTxCounterpartyOutputInfo = Option<(u32, u64)>;
+
/// Upon discovering of some classes of onchain tx by ChannelMonitor, we may have to take actions on it
/// once they mature to enough confirmations (ANTI_REORG_DELAY)
-#[derive(PartialEq)]
+#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
enum OnchainEvent {
/// An outbound HTLC failing after a transaction is confirmed. Used
/// * when an outbound HTLC output is spent by us after the HTLC timed out
/// transaction which appeared on chain.
commitment_tx_output_idx: Option<u32>,
},
+ /// An output waiting on [`ANTI_REORG_DELAY`] confirmations before we hand the user the
+ /// [`SpendableOutputDescriptor`].
MaturingOutput {
descriptor: SpendableOutputDescriptor,
},
/// The CSV delay for the output of the funding spend transaction (implying it is a local
/// commitment transaction, and this is the delay on the to_self output).
on_local_output_csv: Option<u16>,
+ /// If the funding spend transaction was a known remote commitment transaction, we track
+ /// the output index and amount of the counterparty's `to_self` output here.
+ ///
+ /// This allows us to generate a [`Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable`] for the
+ /// counterparty output.
+ commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output: CommitmentTxCounterpartyOutputInfo,
},
/// A spend of a commitment transaction HTLC output, set in the cases where *no* `HTLCUpdate`
/// is constructed. This is used when
/// * an inbound HTLC is claimed by us (with a preimage).
/// * a revoked-state HTLC transaction was broadcasted, which was claimed by the revocation
/// signature.
+ /// * a revoked-state HTLC transaction was broadcasted, which was claimed by an
+ /// HTLC-Success/HTLC-Failure transaction (and is still claimable with a revocation
+ /// signature).
HTLCSpendConfirmation {
commitment_tx_output_idx: u32,
/// If the claim was made by either party with a preimage, this is filled in
fn write<W: Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), io::Error> {
write_tlv_fields!(writer, {
(0, self.txid, required),
+ (1, self.transaction, option),
(2, self.height, required),
+ (3, self.block_hash, option),
(4, self.event, required),
});
Ok(())
impl MaybeReadable for OnchainEventEntry {
fn read<R: io::Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<Option<Self>, DecodeError> {
- let mut txid = Default::default();
+ let mut txid = Txid::all_zeros();
+ let mut transaction = None;
+ let mut block_hash = None;
let mut height = 0;
let mut event = None;
read_tlv_fields!(reader, {
(0, txid, required),
+ (1, transaction, option),
(2, height, required),
+ (3, block_hash, option),
(4, event, ignorable),
});
if let Some(ev) = event {
- Ok(Some(Self { txid, height, event: ev }))
+ Ok(Some(Self { txid, transaction, height, block_hash, event: ev }))
} else {
Ok(None)
}
},
(3, FundingSpendConfirmation) => {
(0, on_local_output_csv, option),
+ (1, commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output, option),
},
(5, HTLCSpendConfirmation) => {
(0, commitment_tx_output_idx, required),
);
-#[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq))]
+#[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq, Eq))]
#[derive(Clone)]
pub(crate) enum ChannelMonitorUpdateStep {
LatestHolderCommitmentTXInfo {
/// HTLCs which we sent to our counterparty which are claimable after a timeout (less on-chain
/// fees) if the counterparty does not know the preimage for the HTLCs. These are somewhat
/// likely to be claimed by our counterparty before we do.
- MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
- /// The amount available to claim, in satoshis, excluding the on-chain fees which will be
- /// required to do so.
+ MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
+ /// The amount potentially available to claim, in satoshis, excluding the on-chain fees
+ /// which will be required to do so.
claimable_amount_satoshis: u64,
/// The height at which we will be able to claim the balance if our counterparty has not
/// done so.
claimable_height: u32,
},
+ /// HTLCs which we received from our counterparty which are claimable with a preimage which we
+ /// do not currently have. This will only be claimable if we receive the preimage from the node
+ /// to which we forwarded this HTLC before the timeout.
+ MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
+ /// The amount potentially available to claim, in satoshis, excluding the on-chain fees
+ /// which will be required to do so.
+ claimable_amount_satoshis: u64,
+ /// The height at which our counterparty will be able to claim the balance if we have not
+ /// yet received the preimage and claimed it ourselves.
+ expiry_height: u32,
+ },
+ /// The channel has been closed, and our counterparty broadcasted a revoked commitment
+ /// transaction.
+ ///
+ /// Thus, we're able to claim all outputs in the commitment transaction, one of which has the
+ /// following amount.
+ CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
+ /// The amount, in satoshis, of the output which we can claim.
+ ///
+ /// Note that for outputs from HTLC balances this may be excluding some on-chain fees that
+ /// were already spent.
+ claimable_amount_satoshis: u64,
+ },
}
/// An HTLC which has been irrevocably resolved on-chain, and has reached ANTI_REORG_DELAY.
-#[derive(PartialEq)]
+#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
struct IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC {
- commitment_tx_output_idx: u32,
+ commitment_tx_output_idx: Option<u32>,
+ /// The txid of the transaction which resolved the HTLC, this may be a commitment (if the HTLC
+ /// was not present in the confirmed commitment transaction), HTLC-Success, or HTLC-Timeout
+ /// transaction.
+ resolving_txid: Option<Txid>, // Added as optional, but always filled in, in 0.0.110
+ resolving_tx: Option<Transaction>,
/// Only set if the HTLC claim was ours using a payment preimage
payment_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>,
}
-impl_writeable_tlv_based!(IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC, {
- (0, commitment_tx_output_idx, required),
- (2, payment_preimage, option),
-});
+// In LDK versions prior to 0.0.111 commitment_tx_output_idx was not Option-al and
+// IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC objects only existed for non-dust HTLCs. This was a bug, but to maintain
+// backwards compatibility we must ensure we always write out a commitment_tx_output_idx field,
+// using `u32::max_value()` as a sentinal to indicate the HTLC was dust.
+impl Writeable for IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC {
+ fn write<W: Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), io::Error> {
+ let mapped_commitment_tx_output_idx = self.commitment_tx_output_idx.unwrap_or(u32::max_value());
+ write_tlv_fields!(writer, {
+ (0, mapped_commitment_tx_output_idx, required),
+ (1, self.resolving_txid, option),
+ (2, self.payment_preimage, option),
+ (3, self.resolving_tx, option),
+ });
+ Ok(())
+ }
+}
+
+impl Readable for IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC {
+ fn read<R: io::Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<Self, DecodeError> {
+ let mut mapped_commitment_tx_output_idx = 0;
+ let mut resolving_txid = None;
+ let mut payment_preimage = None;
+ let mut resolving_tx = None;
+ read_tlv_fields!(reader, {
+ (0, mapped_commitment_tx_output_idx, required),
+ (1, resolving_txid, option),
+ (2, payment_preimage, option),
+ (3, resolving_tx, option),
+ });
+ Ok(Self {
+ commitment_tx_output_idx: if mapped_commitment_tx_output_idx == u32::max_value() { None } else { Some(mapped_commitment_tx_output_idx) },
+ resolving_txid,
+ payment_preimage,
+ resolving_tx,
+ })
+ }
+}
/// A ChannelMonitor handles chain events (blocks connected and disconnected) and generates
/// on-chain transactions to ensure no loss of funds occurs.
// of block connection between ChannelMonitors and the ChannelManager.
funding_spend_seen: bool,
+ /// Set to `Some` of the confirmed transaction spending the funding input of the channel after
+ /// reaching `ANTI_REORG_DELAY` confirmations.
funding_spend_confirmed: Option<Txid>,
+
+ confirmed_commitment_tx_counterparty_output: CommitmentTxCounterpartyOutputInfo,
/// The set of HTLCs which have been either claimed or failed on chain and have reached
/// the requisite confirmations on the claim/fail transaction (either ANTI_REORG_DELAY or the
/// spending CSV for revocable outputs).
htlcs_resolved_on_chain: Vec<IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC>,
+ /// The set of `SpendableOutput` events which we have already passed upstream to be claimed.
+ /// These are tracked explicitly to ensure that we don't generate the same events redundantly
+ /// if users duplicatively confirm old transactions. Specifically for transactions claiming a
+ /// revoked remote outpoint we otherwise have no tracking at all once they've reached
+ /// [`ANTI_REORG_DELAY`], so we have to track them here.
+ spendable_txids_confirmed: Vec<Txid>,
+
// We simply modify best_block in Channel's block_connected so that serialization is
// consistent but hopefully the users' copy handles block_connected in a consistent way.
// (we do *not*, however, update them in update_monitor to ensure any local user copies keep
self.holder_tx_signed != other.holder_tx_signed ||
self.funding_spend_seen != other.funding_spend_seen ||
self.funding_spend_confirmed != other.funding_spend_confirmed ||
+ self.confirmed_commitment_tx_counterparty_output != other.confirmed_commitment_tx_counterparty_output ||
self.htlcs_resolved_on_chain != other.htlcs_resolved_on_chain
{
false
self.channel_keys_id.write(writer)?;
self.holder_revocation_basepoint.write(writer)?;
writer.write_all(&self.funding_info.0.txid[..])?;
- writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be16_to_array(self.funding_info.0.index))?;
+ writer.write_all(&self.funding_info.0.index.to_be_bytes())?;
self.funding_info.1.write(writer)?;
self.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.write(writer)?;
self.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.write(writer)?;
},
}
- writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be16_to_array(self.on_holder_tx_csv))?;
+ writer.write_all(&self.on_holder_tx_csv.to_be_bytes())?;
self.commitment_secrets.write(writer)?;
macro_rules! serialize_htlc_in_commitment {
($htlc_output: expr) => {
writer.write_all(&[$htlc_output.offered as u8; 1])?;
- writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be64_to_array($htlc_output.amount_msat))?;
- writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be32_to_array($htlc_output.cltv_expiry))?;
+ writer.write_all(&$htlc_output.amount_msat.to_be_bytes())?;
+ writer.write_all(&$htlc_output.cltv_expiry.to_be_bytes())?;
writer.write_all(&$htlc_output.payment_hash.0[..])?;
$htlc_output.transaction_output_index.write(writer)?;
}
}
- writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be64_to_array(self.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.len() as u64))?;
+ writer.write_all(&(self.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.len() as u64).to_be_bytes())?;
for (ref txid, ref htlc_infos) in self.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.iter() {
writer.write_all(&txid[..])?;
- writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be64_to_array(htlc_infos.len() as u64))?;
+ writer.write_all(&(htlc_infos.len() as u64).to_be_bytes())?;
for &(ref htlc_output, ref htlc_source) in htlc_infos.iter() {
debug_assert!(htlc_source.is_none() || Some(**txid) == self.current_counterparty_commitment_txid
|| Some(**txid) == self.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid,
}
}
- writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be64_to_array(self.counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain.len() as u64))?;
+ writer.write_all(&(self.counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain.len() as u64).to_be_bytes())?;
for (ref txid, commitment_number) in self.counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain.iter() {
writer.write_all(&txid[..])?;
writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be48_to_array(*commitment_number))?;
}
- writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be64_to_array(self.counterparty_hash_commitment_number.len() as u64))?;
+ writer.write_all(&(self.counterparty_hash_commitment_number.len() as u64).to_be_bytes())?;
for (ref payment_hash, commitment_number) in self.counterparty_hash_commitment_number.iter() {
writer.write_all(&payment_hash.0[..])?;
writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be48_to_array(*commitment_number))?;
writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be48_to_array(self.current_counterparty_commitment_number))?;
writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be48_to_array(self.current_holder_commitment_number))?;
- writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be64_to_array(self.payment_preimages.len() as u64))?;
+ writer.write_all(&(self.payment_preimages.len() as u64).to_be_bytes())?;
for payment_preimage in self.payment_preimages.values() {
writer.write_all(&payment_preimage.0[..])?;
}
}
}
- writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be64_to_array(self.pending_events.len() as u64))?;
+ writer.write_all(&(self.pending_events.len() as u64).to_be_bytes())?;
for event in self.pending_events.iter() {
event.write(writer)?;
}
self.best_block.block_hash().write(writer)?;
- writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be32_to_array(self.best_block.height()))?;
+ writer.write_all(&self.best_block.height().to_be_bytes())?;
- writer.write_all(&byte_utils::be64_to_array(self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.len() as u64))?;
+ writer.write_all(&(self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.len() as u64).to_be_bytes())?;
for ref entry in self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter() {
entry.write(writer)?;
}
(5, self.pending_monitor_events, vec_type),
(7, self.funding_spend_seen, required),
(9, self.counterparty_node_id, option),
+ (11, self.confirmed_commitment_tx_counterparty_output, option),
+ (13, self.spendable_txids_confirmed, vec_type),
});
Ok(())
}
impl<Signer: Sign> ChannelMonitor<Signer> {
+ /// For lockorder enforcement purposes, we need to have a single site which constructs the
+ /// `inner` mutex, otherwise cases where we lock two monitors at the same time (eg in our
+ /// PartialEq implementation) we may decide a lockorder violation has occurred.
+ fn from_impl(imp: ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer>) -> Self {
+ ChannelMonitor { inner: Mutex::new(imp) }
+ }
+
pub(crate) fn new(secp_ctx: Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>, keys: Signer, shutdown_script: Option<Script>,
on_counterparty_tx_csv: u16, destination_script: &Script, funding_info: (OutPoint, Script),
channel_parameters: &ChannelTransactionParameters,
let mut outputs_to_watch = HashMap::new();
outputs_to_watch.insert(funding_info.0.txid, vec![(funding_info.0.index as u32, funding_info.1.clone())]);
- ChannelMonitor {
- inner: Mutex::new(ChannelMonitorImpl {
- latest_update_id: 0,
- commitment_transaction_number_obscure_factor,
+ Self::from_impl(ChannelMonitorImpl {
+ latest_update_id: 0,
+ commitment_transaction_number_obscure_factor,
- destination_script: destination_script.clone(),
- broadcasted_holder_revokable_script: None,
- counterparty_payment_script,
- shutdown_script,
+ destination_script: destination_script.clone(),
+ broadcasted_holder_revokable_script: None,
+ counterparty_payment_script,
+ shutdown_script,
- channel_keys_id,
- holder_revocation_basepoint,
- funding_info,
- current_counterparty_commitment_txid: None,
- prev_counterparty_commitment_txid: None,
+ channel_keys_id,
+ holder_revocation_basepoint,
+ funding_info,
+ current_counterparty_commitment_txid: None,
+ prev_counterparty_commitment_txid: None,
- counterparty_commitment_params,
- funding_redeemscript,
- channel_value_satoshis,
- their_cur_per_commitment_points: None,
+ counterparty_commitment_params,
+ funding_redeemscript,
+ channel_value_satoshis,
+ their_cur_per_commitment_points: None,
- on_holder_tx_csv: counterparty_channel_parameters.selected_contest_delay,
+ on_holder_tx_csv: counterparty_channel_parameters.selected_contest_delay,
- commitment_secrets: CounterpartyCommitmentSecrets::new(),
- counterparty_claimable_outpoints: HashMap::new(),
- counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain: HashMap::new(),
- counterparty_hash_commitment_number: HashMap::new(),
+ commitment_secrets: CounterpartyCommitmentSecrets::new(),
+ counterparty_claimable_outpoints: HashMap::new(),
+ counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain: HashMap::new(),
+ counterparty_hash_commitment_number: HashMap::new(),
- prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx: None,
- current_holder_commitment_tx: holder_commitment_tx,
- current_counterparty_commitment_number: 1 << 48,
- current_holder_commitment_number,
+ prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx: None,
+ current_holder_commitment_tx: holder_commitment_tx,
+ current_counterparty_commitment_number: 1 << 48,
+ current_holder_commitment_number,
- payment_preimages: HashMap::new(),
- pending_monitor_events: Vec::new(),
- pending_events: Vec::new(),
+ payment_preimages: HashMap::new(),
+ pending_monitor_events: Vec::new(),
+ pending_events: Vec::new(),
- onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf: Vec::new(),
- outputs_to_watch,
+ onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf: Vec::new(),
+ outputs_to_watch,
- onchain_tx_handler,
+ onchain_tx_handler,
- lockdown_from_offchain: false,
- holder_tx_signed: false,
- funding_spend_seen: false,
- funding_spend_confirmed: None,
- htlcs_resolved_on_chain: Vec::new(),
+ lockdown_from_offchain: false,
+ holder_tx_signed: false,
+ funding_spend_seen: false,
+ funding_spend_confirmed: None,
+ confirmed_commitment_tx_counterparty_output: None,
+ htlcs_resolved_on_chain: Vec::new(),
+ spendable_txids_confirmed: Vec::new(),
- best_block,
- counterparty_node_id: Some(counterparty_node_id),
+ best_block,
+ counterparty_node_id: Some(counterparty_node_id),
- secp_ctx,
- }),
- }
+ secp_ctx,
+ })
}
#[cfg(test)]
B::Target: BroadcasterInterface,
L::Target: Logger,
{
- self.inner.lock().unwrap().broadcast_latest_holder_commitment_txn(broadcaster, logger)
+ self.inner.lock().unwrap().broadcast_latest_holder_commitment_txn(broadcaster, logger);
}
/// Updates a ChannelMonitor on the basis of some new information provided by the Channel
&self,
updates: &ChannelMonitorUpdate,
broadcaster: &B,
- fee_estimator: &F,
+ fee_estimator: F,
logger: &L,
) -> Result<(), ()>
where
/// Gets the list of pending events which were generated by previous actions, clearing the list
/// in the process.
///
- /// This is called by ChainMonitor::get_and_clear_pending_events() and is equivalent to
- /// EventsProvider::get_and_clear_pending_events() except that it requires &mut self as we do
- /// no internal locking in ChannelMonitors.
+ /// This is called by the [`EventsProvider::process_pending_events`] implementation for
+ /// [`ChainMonitor`].
+ ///
+ /// [`EventsProvider::process_pending_events`]: crate::util::events::EventsProvider::process_pending_events
+ /// [`ChainMonitor`]: crate::chain::chainmonitor::ChainMonitor
pub fn get_and_clear_pending_events(&self) -> Vec<Event> {
self.inner.lock().unwrap().get_and_clear_pending_events()
}
self.inner.lock().unwrap().get_cur_holder_commitment_number()
}
+ /// Gets the `node_id` of the counterparty for this channel.
+ ///
+ /// Will be `None` for channels constructed on LDK versions prior to 0.0.110 and always `Some`
+ /// otherwise.
+ pub fn get_counterparty_node_id(&self) -> Option<PublicKey> {
+ self.inner.lock().unwrap().counterparty_node_id
+ }
+
/// Used by ChannelManager deserialization to broadcast the latest holder state if its copy of
- /// the Channel was out-of-date. You may use it to get a broadcastable holder toxic tx in case of
- /// fallen-behind, i.e when receiving a channel_reestablish with a proof that our counterparty side knows
- /// a higher revocation secret than the holder commitment number we are aware of. Broadcasting these
- /// transactions are UNSAFE, as they allow counterparty side to punish you. Nevertheless you may want to
- /// broadcast them if counterparty don't close channel with his higher commitment transaction after a
- /// substantial amount of time (a month or even a year) to get back funds. Best may be to contact
- /// out-of-band the other node operator to coordinate with him if option is available to you.
- /// In any-case, choice is up to the user.
+ /// the Channel was out-of-date.
+ ///
+ /// You may also use this to broadcast the latest local commitment transaction, either because
+ /// a monitor update failed with [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure`] or because we've
+ /// fallen behind (i.e. we've received proof that our counterparty side knows a revocation
+ /// secret we gave them that they shouldn't know).
+ ///
+ /// Broadcasting these transactions in the second case is UNSAFE, as they allow counterparty
+ /// side to punish you. Nevertheless you may want to broadcast them if counterparty doesn't
+ /// close channel with their commitment transaction after a substantial amount of time. Best
+ /// may be to contact the other node operator out-of-band to coordinate other options available
+ /// to you. In any-case, the choice is up to you.
+ ///
+ /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure`]: super::ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure
pub fn get_latest_holder_commitment_txn<L: Deref>(&self, logger: &L) -> Vec<Transaction>
where L::Target: Logger {
self.inner.lock().unwrap().get_latest_holder_commitment_txn(logger)
}
/// Returns the set of txids that should be monitored for re-organization out of the chain.
- pub fn get_relevant_txids(&self) -> Vec<Txid> {
+ pub fn get_relevant_txids(&self) -> Vec<(Txid, Option<BlockHash>)> {
let inner = self.inner.lock().unwrap();
- let mut txids: Vec<Txid> = inner.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf
+ let mut txids: Vec<(Txid, Option<BlockHash>)> = inner.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf
.iter()
- .map(|entry| entry.txid)
+ .map(|entry| (entry.txid, entry.block_hash))
.chain(inner.onchain_tx_handler.get_relevant_txids().into_iter())
.collect();
txids.sort_unstable();
pub fn current_best_block(&self) -> BestBlock {
self.inner.lock().unwrap().best_block.clone()
}
+}
+
+impl<Signer: Sign> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {
+ /// Helper for get_claimable_balances which does the work for an individual HTLC, generating up
+ /// to one `Balance` for the HTLC.
+ fn get_htlc_balance(&self, htlc: &HTLCOutputInCommitment, holder_commitment: bool,
+ counterparty_revoked_commitment: bool, confirmed_txid: Option<Txid>)
+ -> Option<Balance> {
+ let htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx =
+ if let Some(v) = htlc.transaction_output_index { v } else { return None; };
+
+ let mut htlc_spend_txid_opt = None;
+ let mut htlc_spend_tx_opt = None;
+ let mut holder_timeout_spend_pending = None;
+ let mut htlc_spend_pending = None;
+ let mut holder_delayed_output_pending = None;
+ for event in self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter() {
+ match event.event {
+ OnchainEvent::HTLCUpdate { commitment_tx_output_idx, htlc_value_satoshis, .. }
+ if commitment_tx_output_idx == Some(htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx) => {
+ debug_assert!(htlc_spend_txid_opt.is_none());
+ htlc_spend_txid_opt = Some(&event.txid);
+ debug_assert!(htlc_spend_tx_opt.is_none());
+ htlc_spend_tx_opt = event.transaction.as_ref();
+ debug_assert!(holder_timeout_spend_pending.is_none());
+ debug_assert_eq!(htlc_value_satoshis.unwrap(), htlc.amount_msat / 1000);
+ holder_timeout_spend_pending = Some(event.confirmation_threshold());
+ },
+ OnchainEvent::HTLCSpendConfirmation { commitment_tx_output_idx, preimage, .. }
+ if commitment_tx_output_idx == htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx => {
+ debug_assert!(htlc_spend_txid_opt.is_none());
+ htlc_spend_txid_opt = Some(&event.txid);
+ debug_assert!(htlc_spend_tx_opt.is_none());
+ htlc_spend_tx_opt = event.transaction.as_ref();
+ debug_assert!(htlc_spend_pending.is_none());
+ htlc_spend_pending = Some((event.confirmation_threshold(), preimage.is_some()));
+ },
+ OnchainEvent::MaturingOutput {
+ descriptor: SpendableOutputDescriptor::DelayedPaymentOutput(ref descriptor) }
+ if descriptor.outpoint.index as u32 == htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx => {
+ debug_assert!(holder_delayed_output_pending.is_none());
+ holder_delayed_output_pending = Some(event.confirmation_threshold());
+ },
+ _ => {},
+ }
+ }
+ let htlc_resolved = self.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.iter()
+ .find(|v| if v.commitment_tx_output_idx == Some(htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx) {
+ debug_assert!(htlc_spend_txid_opt.is_none());
+ htlc_spend_txid_opt = v.resolving_txid.as_ref();
+ debug_assert!(htlc_spend_tx_opt.is_none());
+ htlc_spend_tx_opt = v.resolving_tx.as_ref();
+ true
+ } else { false });
+ debug_assert!(holder_timeout_spend_pending.is_some() as u8 + htlc_spend_pending.is_some() as u8 + htlc_resolved.is_some() as u8 <= 1);
+
+ let htlc_commitment_outpoint = BitcoinOutPoint::new(confirmed_txid.unwrap(), htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx);
+ let htlc_output_to_spend =
+ if let Some(txid) = htlc_spend_txid_opt {
+ // Because HTLC transactions either only have 1 input and 1 output (pre-anchors) or
+ // are signed with SIGHASH_SINGLE|ANYONECANPAY under BIP-0143 (post-anchors), we can
+ // locate the correct output by ensuring its adjacent input spends the HTLC output
+ // in the commitment.
+ if let Some(ref tx) = htlc_spend_tx_opt {
+ let htlc_input_idx_opt = tx.input.iter().enumerate()
+ .find(|(_, input)| input.previous_output == htlc_commitment_outpoint)
+ .map(|(idx, _)| idx as u32);
+ debug_assert!(htlc_input_idx_opt.is_some());
+ BitcoinOutPoint::new(*txid, htlc_input_idx_opt.unwrap_or(0))
+ } else {
+ debug_assert!(!self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors());
+ BitcoinOutPoint::new(*txid, 0)
+ }
+ } else {
+ htlc_commitment_outpoint
+ };
+ let htlc_output_spend_pending = self.onchain_tx_handler.is_output_spend_pending(&htlc_output_to_spend);
+ if let Some(conf_thresh) = holder_delayed_output_pending {
+ debug_assert!(holder_commitment);
+ return Some(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
+ claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ confirmation_height: conf_thresh,
+ });
+ } else if htlc_resolved.is_some() && !htlc_output_spend_pending {
+ // Funding transaction spends should be fully confirmed by the time any
+ // HTLC transactions are resolved, unless we're talking about a holder
+ // commitment tx, whose resolution is delayed until the CSV timeout is
+ // reached, even though HTLCs may be resolved after only
+ // ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
+ debug_assert!(holder_commitment || self.funding_spend_confirmed.is_some());
+ } else if counterparty_revoked_commitment {
+ let htlc_output_claim_pending = self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| {
+ if let OnchainEvent::MaturingOutput {
+ descriptor: SpendableOutputDescriptor::StaticOutput { .. }
+ } = &event.event {
+ if event.transaction.as_ref().map(|tx| tx.input.iter().any(|inp| {
+ if let Some(htlc_spend_txid) = htlc_spend_txid_opt {
+ tx.txid() == *htlc_spend_txid || inp.previous_output.txid == *htlc_spend_txid
+ } else {
+ Some(inp.previous_output.txid) == confirmed_txid &&
+ inp.previous_output.vout == htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx
+ }
+ })).unwrap_or(false) {
+ Some(())
+ } else { None }
+ } else { None }
+ });
+ if htlc_output_claim_pending.is_some() {
+ // We already push `Balance`s onto the `res` list for every
+ // `StaticOutput` in a `MaturingOutput` in the revoked
+ // counterparty commitment transaction case generally, so don't
+ // need to do so again here.
+ } else {
+ debug_assert!(holder_timeout_spend_pending.is_none(),
+ "HTLCUpdate OnchainEvents should never appear for preimage claims");
+ debug_assert!(!htlc.offered || htlc_spend_pending.is_none() || !htlc_spend_pending.unwrap().1,
+ "We don't (currently) generate preimage claims against revoked outputs, where did you get one?!");
+ return Some(Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
+ claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ });
+ }
+ } else if htlc.offered == holder_commitment {
+ // If the payment was outbound, check if there's an HTLCUpdate
+ // indicating we have spent this HTLC with a timeout, claiming it back
+ // and awaiting confirmations on it.
+ if let Some(conf_thresh) = holder_timeout_spend_pending {
+ return Some(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
+ claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ confirmation_height: conf_thresh,
+ });
+ } else {
+ return Some(Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
+ claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ claimable_height: htlc.cltv_expiry,
+ });
+ }
+ } else if self.payment_preimages.get(&htlc.payment_hash).is_some() {
+ // Otherwise (the payment was inbound), only expose it as claimable if
+ // we know the preimage.
+ // Note that if there is a pending claim, but it did not use the
+ // preimage, we lost funds to our counterparty! We will then continue
+ // to show it as ContentiousClaimable until ANTI_REORG_DELAY.
+ debug_assert!(holder_timeout_spend_pending.is_none());
+ if let Some((conf_thresh, true)) = htlc_spend_pending {
+ return Some(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
+ claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ confirmation_height: conf_thresh,
+ });
+ } else {
+ return Some(Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
+ claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ timeout_height: htlc.cltv_expiry,
+ });
+ }
+ } else if htlc_resolved.is_none() {
+ return Some(Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
+ claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ expiry_height: htlc.cltv_expiry,
+ });
+ }
+ None
+ }
+}
+
+impl<Signer: Sign> ChannelMonitor<Signer> {
/// Gets the balances in this channel which are either claimable by us if we were to
/// force-close the channel now or which are claimable on-chain (possibly awaiting
/// confirmation).
/// balance, or until our counterparty has claimed the balance and accrued several
/// confirmations on the claim transaction.
///
- /// Note that the balances available when you or your counterparty have broadcasted revoked
- /// state(s) may not be fully captured here.
- // TODO, fix that ^
+ /// Note that for `ChannelMonitors` which track a channel which went on-chain with versions of
+ /// LDK prior to 0.0.111, balances may not be fully captured if our counterparty broadcasted
+ /// a revoked state.
///
/// See [`Balance`] for additional details on the types of claimable balances which
/// may be returned here and their meanings.
let us = self.inner.lock().unwrap();
let mut confirmed_txid = us.funding_spend_confirmed;
+ let mut confirmed_counterparty_output = us.confirmed_commitment_tx_counterparty_output;
let mut pending_commitment_tx_conf_thresh = None;
let funding_spend_pending = us.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| {
- if let OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { .. } = event.event {
+ if let OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output, .. } =
+ event.event
+ {
+ confirmed_counterparty_output = commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output;
Some((event.txid, event.confirmation_threshold()))
} else { None }
});
}
macro_rules! walk_htlcs {
- ($holder_commitment: expr, $htlc_iter: expr) => {
+ ($holder_commitment: expr, $counterparty_revoked_commitment: expr, $htlc_iter: expr) => {
for htlc in $htlc_iter {
- if let Some(htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx) = htlc.transaction_output_index {
- if let Some(conf_thresh) = us.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| {
- if let OnchainEvent::MaturingOutput { descriptor: SpendableOutputDescriptor::DelayedPaymentOutput(descriptor) } = &event.event {
- if descriptor.outpoint.index as u32 == htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx { Some(event.confirmation_threshold()) } else { None }
- } else { None }
- }) {
- debug_assert!($holder_commitment);
- res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
- confirmation_height: conf_thresh,
- });
- } else if us.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.iter().any(|v| v.commitment_tx_output_idx == htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx) {
- // Funding transaction spends should be fully confirmed by the time any
- // HTLC transactions are resolved, unless we're talking about a holder
- // commitment tx, whose resolution is delayed until the CSV timeout is
- // reached, even though HTLCs may be resolved after only
- // ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
- debug_assert!($holder_commitment || us.funding_spend_confirmed.is_some());
- } else if htlc.offered == $holder_commitment {
- // If the payment was outbound, check if there's an HTLCUpdate
- // indicating we have spent this HTLC with a timeout, claiming it back
- // and awaiting confirmations on it.
- let htlc_update_pending = us.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| {
- if let OnchainEvent::HTLCUpdate { commitment_tx_output_idx: Some(commitment_tx_output_idx), .. } = event.event {
- if commitment_tx_output_idx == htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx {
- Some(event.confirmation_threshold()) } else { None }
- } else { None }
- });
- if let Some(conf_thresh) = htlc_update_pending {
- res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
- confirmation_height: conf_thresh,
- });
- } else {
- res.push(Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
- claimable_height: htlc.cltv_expiry,
- });
- }
- } else if us.payment_preimages.get(&htlc.payment_hash).is_some() {
- // Otherwise (the payment was inbound), only expose it as claimable if
- // we know the preimage.
- // Note that if there is a pending claim, but it did not use the
- // preimage, we lost funds to our counterparty! We will then continue
- // to show it as ContentiousClaimable until ANTI_REORG_DELAY.
- let htlc_spend_pending = us.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| {
- if let OnchainEvent::HTLCSpendConfirmation { commitment_tx_output_idx, preimage, .. } = event.event {
- if commitment_tx_output_idx == htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx {
- Some((event.confirmation_threshold(), preimage.is_some()))
- } else { None }
- } else { None }
- });
- if let Some((conf_thresh, true)) = htlc_spend_pending {
- res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
- confirmation_height: conf_thresh,
- });
- } else {
- res.push(Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
- timeout_height: htlc.cltv_expiry,
- });
- }
+ if htlc.transaction_output_index.is_some() {
+
+ if let Some(bal) = us.get_htlc_balance(htlc, $holder_commitment, $counterparty_revoked_commitment, confirmed_txid) {
+ res.push(bal);
}
}
}
if let Some(txid) = confirmed_txid {
let mut found_commitment_tx = false;
- if Some(txid) == us.current_counterparty_commitment_txid || Some(txid) == us.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid {
- walk_htlcs!(false, us.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap().iter().map(|(a, _)| a));
+ if let Some(counterparty_tx_htlcs) = us.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid) {
+ // First look for the to_remote output back to us.
if let Some(conf_thresh) = pending_commitment_tx_conf_thresh {
if let Some(value) = us.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| {
if let OnchainEvent::MaturingOutput {
// confirmation with the same height or have never met our dust amount.
}
}
+ if Some(txid) == us.current_counterparty_commitment_txid || Some(txid) == us.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid {
+ walk_htlcs!(false, false, counterparty_tx_htlcs.iter().map(|(a, _)| a));
+ } else {
+ walk_htlcs!(false, true, counterparty_tx_htlcs.iter().map(|(a, _)| a));
+ // The counterparty broadcasted a revoked state!
+ // Look for any StaticOutputs first, generating claimable balances for those.
+ // If any match the confirmed counterparty revoked to_self output, skip
+ // generating a CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable.
+ let mut spent_counterparty_output = false;
+ for event in us.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter() {
+ if let OnchainEvent::MaturingOutput {
+ descriptor: SpendableOutputDescriptor::StaticOutput { output, .. }
+ } = &event.event {
+ res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
+ claimable_amount_satoshis: output.value,
+ confirmation_height: event.confirmation_threshold(),
+ });
+ if let Some(confirmed_to_self_idx) = confirmed_counterparty_output.map(|(idx, _)| idx) {
+ if event.transaction.as_ref().map(|tx|
+ tx.input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.vout == confirmed_to_self_idx)
+ ).unwrap_or(false) {
+ spent_counterparty_output = true;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if spent_counterparty_output {
+ } else if let Some((confirmed_to_self_idx, amt)) = confirmed_counterparty_output {
+ let output_spendable = us.onchain_tx_handler
+ .is_output_spend_pending(&BitcoinOutPoint::new(txid, confirmed_to_self_idx));
+ if output_spendable {
+ res.push(Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
+ claimable_amount_satoshis: amt,
+ });
+ }
+ } else {
+ // Counterparty output is missing, either it was broadcasted on a
+ // previous version of LDK or the counterparty hadn't met dust.
+ }
+ }
found_commitment_tx = true;
} else if txid == us.current_holder_commitment_tx.txid {
- walk_htlcs!(true, us.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|(a, _, _)| a));
+ walk_htlcs!(true, false, us.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|(a, _, _)| a));
if let Some(conf_thresh) = pending_commitment_tx_conf_thresh {
res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
claimable_amount_satoshis: us.current_holder_commitment_tx.to_self_value_sat,
found_commitment_tx = true;
} else if let Some(prev_commitment) = &us.prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx {
if txid == prev_commitment.txid {
- walk_htlcs!(true, prev_commitment.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|(a, _, _)| a));
+ walk_htlcs!(true, false, prev_commitment.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|(a, _, _)| a));
if let Some(conf_thresh) = pending_commitment_tx_conf_thresh {
res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
claimable_amount_satoshis: prev_commitment.to_self_value_sat,
});
}
}
- // TODO: Add logic to provide claimable balances for counterparty broadcasting revoked
- // outputs.
} else {
let mut claimable_inbound_htlc_value_sat = 0;
for (htlc, _, _) in us.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter() {
if htlc.transaction_output_index.is_none() { continue; }
if htlc.offered {
- res.push(Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
+ res.push(Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
claimable_height: htlc.cltv_expiry,
});
} else if us.payment_preimages.get(&htlc.payment_hash).is_some() {
claimable_inbound_htlc_value_sat += htlc.amount_msat / 1000;
+ } else {
+ // As long as the HTLC is still in our latest commitment state, treat
+ // it as potentially claimable, even if it has long-since expired.
+ res.push(Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
+ claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ expiry_height: htlc.cltv_expiry,
+ });
}
}
res.push(Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
res
}
+ /// Gets the set of outbound HTLCs which can be (or have been) resolved by this
+ /// `ChannelMonitor`. This is used to determine if an HTLC was removed from the channel prior
+ /// to the `ChannelManager` having been persisted.
+ ///
+ /// This is similar to [`Self::get_pending_outbound_htlcs`] except it includes HTLCs which were
+ /// resolved by this `ChannelMonitor`.
+ pub(crate) fn get_all_current_outbound_htlcs(&self) -> HashMap<HTLCSource, HTLCOutputInCommitment> {
+ let mut res = HashMap::new();
+ // Just examine the available counterparty commitment transactions. See docs on
+ // `fail_unbroadcast_htlcs`, below, for justification.
+ let us = self.inner.lock().unwrap();
+ macro_rules! walk_counterparty_commitment {
+ ($txid: expr) => {
+ if let Some(ref latest_outpoints) = us.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get($txid) {
+ for &(ref htlc, ref source_option) in latest_outpoints.iter() {
+ if let &Some(ref source) = source_option {
+ res.insert((**source).clone(), htlc.clone());
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ if let Some(ref txid) = us.current_counterparty_commitment_txid {
+ walk_counterparty_commitment!(txid);
+ }
+ if let Some(ref txid) = us.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid {
+ walk_counterparty_commitment!(txid);
+ }
+ res
+ }
+
/// Gets the set of outbound HTLCs which are pending resolution in this channel.
/// This is used to reconstruct pending outbound payments on restart in the ChannelManager.
pub(crate) fn get_pending_outbound_htlcs(&self) -> HashMap<HTLCSource, HTLCOutputInCommitment> {
- let mut res = HashMap::new();
let us = self.inner.lock().unwrap();
+ // We're only concerned with the confirmation count of HTLC transactions, and don't
+ // actually care how many confirmations a commitment transaction may or may not have. Thus,
+ // we look for either a FundingSpendConfirmation event or a funding_spend_confirmed.
+ let confirmed_txid = us.funding_spend_confirmed.or_else(|| {
+ us.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| {
+ if let OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { .. } = event.event {
+ Some(event.txid)
+ } else { None }
+ })
+ });
+ if confirmed_txid.is_none() {
+ // If we have not seen a commitment transaction on-chain (ie the channel is not yet
+ // closed), just get the full set.
+ mem::drop(us);
+ return self.get_all_current_outbound_htlcs();
+ }
+
+ let mut res = HashMap::new();
macro_rules! walk_htlcs {
($holder_commitment: expr, $htlc_iter: expr) => {
for (htlc, source) in $htlc_iter {
- if us.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.iter().any(|v| Some(v.commitment_tx_output_idx) == htlc.transaction_output_index) {
+ if us.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.iter().any(|v| v.commitment_tx_output_idx == htlc.transaction_output_index) {
// We should assert that funding_spend_confirmed is_some() here, but we
// have some unit tests which violate HTLC transaction CSVs entirely and
// would fail.
}
}
- // We're only concerned with the confirmation count of HTLC transactions, and don't
- // actually care how many confirmations a commitment transaction may or may not have. Thus,
- // we look for either a FundingSpendConfirmation event or a funding_spend_confirmed.
- let confirmed_txid = us.funding_spend_confirmed.or_else(|| {
- us.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| {
- if let OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { .. } = event.event {
- Some(event.txid)
+ let txid = confirmed_txid.unwrap();
+ if Some(txid) == us.current_counterparty_commitment_txid || Some(txid) == us.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid {
+ walk_htlcs!(false, us.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap().iter().filter_map(|(a, b)| {
+ if let &Some(ref source) = b {
+ Some((a, &**source))
} else { None }
- })
- });
- if let Some(txid) = confirmed_txid {
- if Some(txid) == us.current_counterparty_commitment_txid || Some(txid) == us.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid {
- walk_htlcs!(false, us.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap().iter().filter_map(|(a, b)| {
- if let &Some(ref source) = b {
- Some((a, &**source))
- } else { None }
- }));
- } else if txid == us.current_holder_commitment_tx.txid {
- walk_htlcs!(true, us.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().filter_map(|(a, _, c)| {
+ }));
+ } else if txid == us.current_holder_commitment_tx.txid {
+ walk_htlcs!(true, us.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().filter_map(|(a, _, c)| {
+ if let Some(source) = c { Some((a, source)) } else { None }
+ }));
+ } else if let Some(prev_commitment) = &us.prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx {
+ if txid == prev_commitment.txid {
+ walk_htlcs!(true, prev_commitment.htlc_outputs.iter().filter_map(|(a, _, c)| {
if let Some(source) = c { Some((a, source)) } else { None }
}));
- } else if let Some(prev_commitment) = &us.prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx {
- if txid == prev_commitment.txid {
- walk_htlcs!(true, prev_commitment.htlc_outputs.iter().filter_map(|(a, _, c)| {
- if let Some(source) = c { Some((a, source)) } else { None }
- }));
- }
- }
- } else {
- // If we have not seen a commitment transaction on-chain (ie the channel is not yet
- // closed), just examine the available counterparty commitment transactions. See docs
- // on `fail_unbroadcast_htlcs`, below, for justification.
- macro_rules! walk_counterparty_commitment {
- ($txid: expr) => {
- if let Some(ref latest_outpoints) = us.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get($txid) {
- for &(ref htlc, ref source_option) in latest_outpoints.iter() {
- if let &Some(ref source) = source_option {
- res.insert((**source).clone(), htlc.clone());
- }
- }
- }
- }
- }
- if let Some(ref txid) = us.current_counterparty_commitment_txid {
- walk_counterparty_commitment!(txid);
- }
- if let Some(ref txid) = us.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid {
- walk_counterparty_commitment!(txid);
}
}
/// as long as we examine both the current counterparty commitment transaction and, if it hasn't
/// been revoked yet, the previous one, we we will never "forget" to resolve an HTLC.
macro_rules! fail_unbroadcast_htlcs {
- ($self: expr, $commitment_tx_type: expr, $commitment_txid_confirmed: expr,
- $commitment_tx_conf_height: expr, $confirmed_htlcs_list: expr, $logger: expr) => { {
+ ($self: expr, $commitment_tx_type: expr, $commitment_txid_confirmed: expr, $commitment_tx_confirmed: expr,
+ $commitment_tx_conf_height: expr, $commitment_tx_conf_hash: expr, $confirmed_htlcs_list: expr, $logger: expr) => { {
+ debug_assert_eq!($commitment_tx_confirmed.txid(), $commitment_txid_confirmed);
+
macro_rules! check_htlc_fails {
($txid: expr, $commitment_tx: expr) => {
if let Some(ref latest_outpoints) = $self.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get($txid) {
});
let entry = OnchainEventEntry {
txid: $commitment_txid_confirmed,
+ transaction: Some($commitment_tx_confirmed.clone()),
height: $commitment_tx_conf_height,
+ block_hash: Some(*$commitment_tx_conf_hash),
event: OnchainEvent::HTLCUpdate {
source: (**source).clone(),
payment_hash: htlc.payment_hash.clone(),
#[cfg(test)]
pub fn deliberately_bogus_accepted_htlc_witness_program() -> Vec<u8> {
- let mut ret = [opcodes::all::OP_NOP.into_u8(); 136];
- ret[131] = opcodes::all::OP_DROP.into_u8();
- ret[132] = opcodes::all::OP_DROP.into_u8();
- ret[133] = opcodes::all::OP_DROP.into_u8();
- ret[134] = opcodes::all::OP_DROP.into_u8();
- ret[135] = opcodes::OP_TRUE.into_u8();
+ let mut ret = [opcodes::all::OP_NOP.to_u8(); 136];
+ ret[131] = opcodes::all::OP_DROP.to_u8();
+ ret[132] = opcodes::all::OP_DROP.to_u8();
+ ret[133] = opcodes::all::OP_DROP.to_u8();
+ ret[134] = opcodes::all::OP_DROP.to_u8();
+ ret[135] = opcodes::OP_TRUE.to_u8();
Vec::from(&ret[..])
}
// First check if a counterparty commitment transaction has been broadcasted:
macro_rules! claim_htlcs {
($commitment_number: expr, $txid: expr) => {
- let htlc_claim_reqs = self.get_counterparty_htlc_output_claim_reqs($commitment_number, $txid, None);
- self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view(&Vec::new(), htlc_claim_reqs, self.best_block.height(), self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger);
+ let (htlc_claim_reqs, _) = self.get_counterparty_output_claim_info($commitment_number, $txid, None);
+ self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view_from_requests(htlc_claim_reqs, self.best_block.height(), self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger);
}
}
if let Some(txid) = self.current_counterparty_commitment_txid {
// block. Even if not, its a reasonable metric for the bump criteria on the HTLC
// transactions.
let (claim_reqs, _) = self.get_broadcasted_holder_claims(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx, self.best_block.height());
- self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view(&Vec::new(), claim_reqs, self.best_block.height(), self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger);
+ self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view_from_requests(claim_reqs, self.best_block.height(), self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger);
if let Some(ref tx) = self.prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx {
let (claim_reqs, _) = self.get_broadcasted_holder_claims(&tx, self.best_block.height());
- self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view(&Vec::new(), claim_reqs, self.best_block.height(), self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger);
+ self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view_from_requests(claim_reqs, self.best_block.height(), self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger);
}
}
}
self.pending_monitor_events.push(MonitorEvent::CommitmentTxConfirmed(self.funding_info.0));
}
- pub fn update_monitor<B: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref>(&mut self, updates: &ChannelMonitorUpdate, broadcaster: &B, fee_estimator: &F, logger: &L) -> Result<(), ()>
+ pub fn update_monitor<B: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref>(&mut self, updates: &ChannelMonitorUpdate, broadcaster: &B, fee_estimator: F, logger: &L) -> Result<(), ()>
where B::Target: BroadcasterInterface,
- F::Target: FeeEstimator,
- L::Target: Logger,
+ F::Target: FeeEstimator,
+ L::Target: Logger,
{
log_info!(logger, "Applying update to monitor {}, bringing update_id from {} to {} with {} changes.",
log_funding_info!(self), self.latest_update_id, updates.update_id, updates.updates.len());
panic!("Attempted to apply ChannelMonitorUpdates out of order, check the update_id before passing an update to update_monitor!");
}
let mut ret = Ok(());
+ let bounded_fee_estimator = LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&*fee_estimator);
for update in updates.updates.iter() {
match update {
ChannelMonitorUpdateStep::LatestHolderCommitmentTXInfo { commitment_tx, htlc_outputs } => {
},
ChannelMonitorUpdateStep::PaymentPreimage { payment_preimage } => {
log_trace!(logger, "Updating ChannelMonitor with payment preimage");
- let bounded_fee_estimator = LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(fee_estimator);
self.provide_payment_preimage(&PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&payment_preimage.0[..]).into_inner()), &payment_preimage, broadcaster, &bounded_fee_estimator, logger)
},
ChannelMonitorUpdateStep::CommitmentSecret { idx, secret } => {
log_trace!(logger, "Updating ChannelMonitor: channel force closed, should broadcast: {}", should_broadcast);
self.lockdown_from_offchain = true;
if *should_broadcast {
+ // There's no need to broadcast our commitment transaction if we've seen one
+ // confirmed (even with 1 confirmation) as it'll be rejected as
+ // duplicate/conflicting.
+ let detected_funding_spend = self.funding_spend_confirmed.is_some() ||
+ self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find(|event| match event.event {
+ OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { .. } => true,
+ _ => false,
+ }).is_some();
+ if detected_funding_spend {
+ continue;
+ }
self.broadcast_latest_holder_commitment_txn(broadcaster, logger);
+ // If the channel supports anchor outputs, we'll need to emit an external
+ // event to be consumed such that a child transaction is broadcast with a
+ // high enough feerate for the parent commitment transaction to confirm.
+ if self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors() {
+ let funding_output = HolderFundingOutput::build(
+ self.funding_redeemscript.clone(), self.channel_value_satoshis,
+ self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors(),
+ );
+ let best_block_height = self.best_block.height();
+ let commitment_package = PackageTemplate::build_package(
+ self.funding_info.0.txid.clone(), self.funding_info.0.index as u32,
+ PackageSolvingData::HolderFundingOutput(funding_output),
+ best_block_height, false, best_block_height,
+ );
+ self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view_from_requests(
+ vec![commitment_package], best_block_height, best_block_height,
+ broadcaster, &bounded_fee_estimator, logger,
+ );
+ }
} else if !self.holder_tx_signed {
- log_error!(logger, "You have a toxic holder commitment transaction avaible in channel monitor, read comment in ChannelMonitor::get_latest_holder_commitment_txn to be informed of manual action to take");
+ log_error!(logger, "WARNING: You have a potentially-unsafe holder commitment transaction available to broadcast");
+ log_error!(logger, " in channel monitor for channel {}!", log_bytes!(self.funding_info.0.to_channel_id()));
+ log_error!(logger, " Read the docs for ChannelMonitor::get_latest_holder_commitment_txn and take manual action!");
} else {
// If we generated a MonitorEvent::CommitmentTxConfirmed, the ChannelManager
// will still give us a ChannelForceClosed event with !should_broadcast, but we
pub fn get_and_clear_pending_events(&mut self) -> Vec<Event> {
let mut ret = Vec::new();
mem::swap(&mut ret, &mut self.pending_events);
+ #[cfg(anchors)]
+ for claim_event in self.onchain_tx_handler.get_and_clear_pending_claim_events().drain(..) {
+ match claim_event {
+ ClaimEvent::BumpCommitment {
+ package_target_feerate_sat_per_1000_weight, commitment_tx, anchor_output_idx,
+ } => {
+ let commitment_txid = commitment_tx.txid();
+ debug_assert_eq!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.txid, commitment_txid);
+ let pending_htlcs = self.current_holder_commitment_tx.non_dust_htlcs();
+ let commitment_tx_fee_satoshis = self.channel_value_satoshis -
+ commitment_tx.output.iter().fold(0u64, |sum, output| sum + output.value);
+ ret.push(Event::BumpTransaction(BumpTransactionEvent::ChannelClose {
+ package_target_feerate_sat_per_1000_weight,
+ commitment_tx,
+ commitment_tx_fee_satoshis,
+ anchor_descriptor: AnchorDescriptor {
+ channel_keys_id: self.channel_keys_id,
+ channel_value_satoshis: self.channel_value_satoshis,
+ outpoint: BitcoinOutPoint {
+ txid: commitment_txid,
+ vout: anchor_output_idx,
+ },
+ },
+ pending_htlcs,
+ }));
+ },
+ ClaimEvent::BumpHTLC {
+ target_feerate_sat_per_1000_weight, htlcs,
+ } => {
+ let mut htlc_descriptors = Vec::with_capacity(htlcs.len());
+ for htlc in htlcs {
+ htlc_descriptors.push(HTLCDescriptor {
+ channel_keys_id: self.channel_keys_id,
+ channel_value_satoshis: self.channel_value_satoshis,
+ channel_parameters: self.onchain_tx_handler.channel_transaction_parameters.clone(),
+ commitment_txid: htlc.commitment_txid,
+ per_commitment_number: htlc.per_commitment_number,
+ htlc: htlc.htlc,
+ preimage: htlc.preimage,
+ counterparty_sig: htlc.counterparty_sig,
+ });
+ }
+ ret.push(Event::BumpTransaction(BumpTransactionEvent::HTLCResolution {
+ target_feerate_sat_per_1000_weight,
+ htlc_descriptors,
+ }));
+ }
+ }
+ }
ret
}
/// data in counterparty_claimable_outpoints. Will directly claim any HTLC outputs which expire at a
/// height > height + CLTV_SHARED_CLAIM_BUFFER. In any case, will install monitoring for
/// HTLC-Success/HTLC-Timeout transactions.
- /// Return updates for HTLC pending in the channel and failed automatically by the broadcast of
- /// revoked counterparty commitment tx
- fn check_spend_counterparty_transaction<L: Deref>(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, logger: &L) -> (Vec<PackageTemplate>, TransactionOutputs) where L::Target: Logger {
+ ///
+ /// Returns packages to claim the revoked output(s), as well as additional outputs to watch and
+ /// general information about the output that is to the counterparty in the commitment
+ /// transaction.
+ fn check_spend_counterparty_transaction<L: Deref>(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, block_hash: &BlockHash, logger: &L)
+ -> (Vec<PackageTemplate>, TransactionOutputs, CommitmentTxCounterpartyOutputInfo)
+ where L::Target: Logger {
// Most secp and related errors trying to create keys means we have no hope of constructing
// a spend transaction...so we return no transactions to broadcast
let mut claimable_outpoints = Vec::new();
let mut watch_outputs = Vec::new();
+ let mut to_counterparty_output_info = None;
let commitment_txid = tx.txid(); //TODO: This is gonna be a performance bottleneck for watchtowers!
let per_commitment_option = self.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&commitment_txid);
( $thing : expr ) => {
match $thing {
Ok(a) => a,
- Err(_) => return (claimable_outpoints, (commitment_txid, watch_outputs))
+ Err(_) => return (claimable_outpoints, (commitment_txid, watch_outputs), to_counterparty_output_info)
}
};
}
- let commitment_number = 0xffffffffffff - ((((tx.input[0].sequence as u64 & 0xffffff) << 3*8) | (tx.lock_time as u64 & 0xffffff)) ^ self.commitment_transaction_number_obscure_factor);
+ let commitment_number = 0xffffffffffff - ((((tx.input[0].sequence.0 as u64 & 0xffffff) << 3*8) | (tx.lock_time.0 as u64 & 0xffffff)) ^ self.commitment_transaction_number_obscure_factor);
if commitment_number >= self.get_min_seen_secret() {
let secret = self.get_secret(commitment_number).unwrap();
let per_commitment_key = ignore_error!(SecretKey::from_slice(&secret));
let per_commitment_point = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&self.secp_ctx, &per_commitment_key);
- let revocation_pubkey = ignore_error!(chan_utils::derive_public_revocation_key(&self.secp_ctx, &per_commitment_point, &self.holder_revocation_basepoint));
- let delayed_key = ignore_error!(chan_utils::derive_public_key(&self.secp_ctx, &PublicKey::from_secret_key(&self.secp_ctx, &per_commitment_key), &self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key));
+ let revocation_pubkey = chan_utils::derive_public_revocation_key(&self.secp_ctx, &per_commitment_point, &self.holder_revocation_basepoint);
+ let delayed_key = chan_utils::derive_public_key(&self.secp_ctx, &PublicKey::from_secret_key(&self.secp_ctx, &per_commitment_key), &self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key);
let revokeable_redeemscript = chan_utils::get_revokeable_redeemscript(&revocation_pubkey, self.counterparty_commitment_params.on_counterparty_tx_csv, &delayed_key);
let revokeable_p2wsh = revokeable_redeemscript.to_v0_p2wsh();
let revk_outp = RevokedOutput::build(per_commitment_point, self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key, self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_htlc_base_key, per_commitment_key, outp.value, self.counterparty_commitment_params.on_counterparty_tx_csv);
let justice_package = PackageTemplate::build_package(commitment_txid, idx as u32, PackageSolvingData::RevokedOutput(revk_outp), height + self.counterparty_commitment_params.on_counterparty_tx_csv as u32, true, height);
claimable_outpoints.push(justice_package);
+ to_counterparty_output_info =
+ Some((idx.try_into().expect("Txn can't have more than 2^32 outputs"), outp.value));
}
}
if let Some(transaction_output_index) = htlc.transaction_output_index {
if transaction_output_index as usize >= tx.output.len() ||
tx.output[transaction_output_index as usize].value != htlc.amount_msat / 1000 {
- return (claimable_outpoints, (commitment_txid, watch_outputs)); // Corrupted per_commitment_data, fuck this user
+ // per_commitment_data is corrupt or our commitment signing key leaked!
+ return (claimable_outpoints, (commitment_txid, watch_outputs),
+ to_counterparty_output_info);
}
let revk_htlc_outp = RevokedHTLCOutput::build(per_commitment_point, self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key, self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_htlc_base_key, per_commitment_key, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc.clone(), self.onchain_tx_handler.channel_transaction_parameters.opt_anchors.is_some());
let justice_package = PackageTemplate::build_package(commitment_txid, transaction_output_index, PackageSolvingData::RevokedHTLCOutput(revk_htlc_outp), htlc.cltv_expiry, true, height);
self.counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain.insert(commitment_txid, commitment_number);
if let Some(per_commitment_data) = per_commitment_option {
- fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "revoked_counterparty", commitment_txid, height,
- per_commitment_data.iter().map(|(htlc, htlc_source)|
+ fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "revoked_counterparty", commitment_txid, tx, height,
+ block_hash, per_commitment_data.iter().map(|(htlc, htlc_source)|
(htlc, htlc_source.as_ref().map(|htlc_source| htlc_source.as_ref()))
), logger);
} else {
debug_assert!(false, "We should have per-commitment option for any recognized old commitment txn");
- fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "revoked counterparty", commitment_txid, height,
- [].iter().map(|reference| *reference), logger);
+ fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "revoked counterparty", commitment_txid, tx, height,
+ block_hash, [].iter().map(|reference| *reference), logger);
}
}
} else if let Some(per_commitment_data) = per_commitment_option {
self.counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain.insert(commitment_txid, commitment_number);
log_info!(logger, "Got broadcast of non-revoked counterparty commitment transaction {}", commitment_txid);
- fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "counterparty", commitment_txid, height,
+ fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "counterparty", commitment_txid, tx, height, block_hash,
per_commitment_data.iter().map(|(htlc, htlc_source)|
(htlc, htlc_source.as_ref().map(|htlc_source| htlc_source.as_ref()))
), logger);
- let htlc_claim_reqs = self.get_counterparty_htlc_output_claim_reqs(commitment_number, commitment_txid, Some(tx));
+ let (htlc_claim_reqs, counterparty_output_info) =
+ self.get_counterparty_output_claim_info(commitment_number, commitment_txid, Some(tx));
+ to_counterparty_output_info = counterparty_output_info;
for req in htlc_claim_reqs {
claimable_outpoints.push(req);
}
}
- (claimable_outpoints, (commitment_txid, watch_outputs))
+ (claimable_outpoints, (commitment_txid, watch_outputs), to_counterparty_output_info)
}
- fn get_counterparty_htlc_output_claim_reqs(&self, commitment_number: u64, commitment_txid: Txid, tx: Option<&Transaction>) -> Vec<PackageTemplate> {
+ /// Returns the HTLC claim package templates and the counterparty output info
+ fn get_counterparty_output_claim_info(&self, commitment_number: u64, commitment_txid: Txid, tx: Option<&Transaction>)
+ -> (Vec<PackageTemplate>, CommitmentTxCounterpartyOutputInfo) {
let mut claimable_outpoints = Vec::new();
- if let Some(htlc_outputs) = self.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&commitment_txid) {
- if let Some(per_commitment_points) = self.their_cur_per_commitment_points {
- let per_commitment_point_option =
- // If the counterparty commitment tx is the latest valid state, use their latest
- // per-commitment point
- if per_commitment_points.0 == commitment_number { Some(&per_commitment_points.1) }
- else if let Some(point) = per_commitment_points.2.as_ref() {
- // If counterparty commitment tx is the state previous to the latest valid state, use
- // their previous per-commitment point (non-atomicity of revocation means it's valid for
- // them to temporarily have two valid commitment txns from our viewpoint)
- if per_commitment_points.0 == commitment_number + 1 { Some(point) } else { None }
- } else { None };
- if let Some(per_commitment_point) = per_commitment_point_option {
- for (_, &(ref htlc, _)) in htlc_outputs.iter().enumerate() {
- if let Some(transaction_output_index) = htlc.transaction_output_index {
- if let Some(transaction) = tx {
- if transaction_output_index as usize >= transaction.output.len() ||
- transaction.output[transaction_output_index as usize].value != htlc.amount_msat / 1000 {
- return claimable_outpoints; // Corrupted per_commitment_data, fuck this user
- }
- }
- let preimage = if htlc.offered { if let Some(p) = self.payment_preimages.get(&htlc.payment_hash) { Some(*p) } else { None } } else { None };
- if preimage.is_some() || !htlc.offered {
- let counterparty_htlc_outp = if htlc.offered {
- PackageSolvingData::CounterpartyOfferedHTLCOutput(
- CounterpartyOfferedHTLCOutput::build(*per_commitment_point,
- self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key,
- self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_htlc_base_key,
- preimage.unwrap(), htlc.clone()))
- } else {
- PackageSolvingData::CounterpartyReceivedHTLCOutput(
- CounterpartyReceivedHTLCOutput::build(*per_commitment_point,
- self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key,
- self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_htlc_base_key,
- htlc.clone()))
- };
- let aggregation = if !htlc.offered { false } else { true };
- let counterparty_package = PackageTemplate::build_package(commitment_txid, transaction_output_index, counterparty_htlc_outp, htlc.cltv_expiry,aggregation, 0);
- claimable_outpoints.push(counterparty_package);
- }
- }
- }
+ let mut to_counterparty_output_info: CommitmentTxCounterpartyOutputInfo = None;
+
+ let htlc_outputs = match self.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&commitment_txid) {
+ Some(outputs) => outputs,
+ None => return (claimable_outpoints, to_counterparty_output_info),
+ };
+ let per_commitment_points = match self.their_cur_per_commitment_points {
+ Some(points) => points,
+ None => return (claimable_outpoints, to_counterparty_output_info),
+ };
+
+ let per_commitment_point =
+ // If the counterparty commitment tx is the latest valid state, use their latest
+ // per-commitment point
+ if per_commitment_points.0 == commitment_number { &per_commitment_points.1 }
+ else if let Some(point) = per_commitment_points.2.as_ref() {
+ // If counterparty commitment tx is the state previous to the latest valid state, use
+ // their previous per-commitment point (non-atomicity of revocation means it's valid for
+ // them to temporarily have two valid commitment txns from our viewpoint)
+ if per_commitment_points.0 == commitment_number + 1 {
+ point
+ } else { return (claimable_outpoints, to_counterparty_output_info); }
+ } else { return (claimable_outpoints, to_counterparty_output_info); };
+
+ if let Some(transaction) = tx {
+ let revocation_pubkey = chan_utils::derive_public_revocation_key(
+ &self.secp_ctx, &per_commitment_point, &self.holder_revocation_basepoint);
+ let delayed_key = chan_utils::derive_public_key(&self.secp_ctx,
+ &per_commitment_point,
+ &self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key);
+ let revokeable_p2wsh = chan_utils::get_revokeable_redeemscript(&revocation_pubkey,
+ self.counterparty_commitment_params.on_counterparty_tx_csv,
+ &delayed_key).to_v0_p2wsh();
+ for (idx, outp) in transaction.output.iter().enumerate() {
+ if outp.script_pubkey == revokeable_p2wsh {
+ to_counterparty_output_info =
+ Some((idx.try_into().expect("Can't have > 2^32 outputs"), outp.value));
}
}
}
- claimable_outpoints
- }
- /// Attempts to claim a counterparty HTLC-Success/HTLC-Timeout's outputs using the revocation key
- fn check_spend_counterparty_htlc<L: Deref>(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, commitment_number: u64, height: u32, logger: &L) -> (Vec<PackageTemplate>, Option<TransactionOutputs>) where L::Target: Logger {
- let htlc_txid = tx.txid();
- if tx.input.len() != 1 || tx.output.len() != 1 || tx.input[0].witness.len() != 5 {
- return (Vec::new(), None)
- }
-
- macro_rules! ignore_error {
- ( $thing : expr ) => {
- match $thing {
- Ok(a) => a,
- Err(_) => return (Vec::new(), None)
+ for (_, &(ref htlc, _)) in htlc_outputs.iter().enumerate() {
+ if let Some(transaction_output_index) = htlc.transaction_output_index {
+ if let Some(transaction) = tx {
+ if transaction_output_index as usize >= transaction.output.len() ||
+ transaction.output[transaction_output_index as usize].value != htlc.amount_msat / 1000 {
+ // per_commitment_data is corrupt or our commitment signing key leaked!
+ return (claimable_outpoints, to_counterparty_output_info);
+ }
}
- };
+ let preimage = if htlc.offered { if let Some(p) = self.payment_preimages.get(&htlc.payment_hash) { Some(*p) } else { None } } else { None };
+ if preimage.is_some() || !htlc.offered {
+ let counterparty_htlc_outp = if htlc.offered {
+ PackageSolvingData::CounterpartyOfferedHTLCOutput(
+ CounterpartyOfferedHTLCOutput::build(*per_commitment_point,
+ self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key,
+ self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_htlc_base_key,
+ preimage.unwrap(), htlc.clone(), self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors()))
+ } else {
+ PackageSolvingData::CounterpartyReceivedHTLCOutput(
+ CounterpartyReceivedHTLCOutput::build(*per_commitment_point,
+ self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key,
+ self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_htlc_base_key,
+ htlc.clone(), self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors()))
+ };
+ let aggregation = if !htlc.offered { false } else { true };
+ let counterparty_package = PackageTemplate::build_package(commitment_txid, transaction_output_index, counterparty_htlc_outp, htlc.cltv_expiry,aggregation, 0);
+ claimable_outpoints.push(counterparty_package);
+ }
+ }
}
+ (claimable_outpoints, to_counterparty_output_info)
+ }
+
+ /// Attempts to claim a counterparty HTLC-Success/HTLC-Timeout's outputs using the revocation key
+ fn check_spend_counterparty_htlc<L: Deref>(
+ &mut self, tx: &Transaction, commitment_number: u64, commitment_txid: &Txid, height: u32, logger: &L
+ ) -> (Vec<PackageTemplate>, Option<TransactionOutputs>) where L::Target: Logger {
let secret = if let Some(secret) = self.get_secret(commitment_number) { secret } else { return (Vec::new(), None); };
- let per_commitment_key = ignore_error!(SecretKey::from_slice(&secret));
+ let per_commitment_key = match SecretKey::from_slice(&secret) {
+ Ok(key) => key,
+ Err(_) => return (Vec::new(), None)
+ };
let per_commitment_point = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&self.secp_ctx, &per_commitment_key);
- log_error!(logger, "Got broadcast of revoked counterparty HTLC transaction, spending {}:{}", htlc_txid, 0);
- let revk_outp = RevokedOutput::build(per_commitment_point, self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key, self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_htlc_base_key, per_commitment_key, tx.output[0].value, self.counterparty_commitment_params.on_counterparty_tx_csv);
- let justice_package = PackageTemplate::build_package(htlc_txid, 0, PackageSolvingData::RevokedOutput(revk_outp), height + self.counterparty_commitment_params.on_counterparty_tx_csv as u32, true, height);
- let claimable_outpoints = vec!(justice_package);
- let outputs = vec![(0, tx.output[0].clone())];
- (claimable_outpoints, Some((htlc_txid, outputs)))
+ let htlc_txid = tx.txid();
+ let mut claimable_outpoints = vec![];
+ let mut outputs_to_watch = None;
+ // Previously, we would only claim HTLCs from revoked HTLC transactions if they had 1 input
+ // with a witness of 5 elements and 1 output. This wasn't enough for anchor outputs, as the
+ // counterparty can now aggregate multiple HTLCs into a single transaction thanks to
+ // `SIGHASH_SINGLE` remote signatures, leading us to not claim any HTLCs upon seeing a
+ // confirmed revoked HTLC transaction (for more details, see
+ // https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2022-April/003561.html).
+ //
+ // We make sure we're not vulnerable to this case by checking all inputs of the transaction,
+ // and claim those which spend the commitment transaction, have a witness of 5 elements, and
+ // have a corresponding output at the same index within the transaction.
+ for (idx, input) in tx.input.iter().enumerate() {
+ if input.previous_output.txid == *commitment_txid && input.witness.len() == 5 && tx.output.get(idx).is_some() {
+ log_error!(logger, "Got broadcast of revoked counterparty HTLC transaction, spending {}:{}", htlc_txid, idx);
+ let revk_outp = RevokedOutput::build(
+ per_commitment_point, self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key,
+ self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_htlc_base_key, per_commitment_key,
+ tx.output[idx].value, self.counterparty_commitment_params.on_counterparty_tx_csv
+ );
+ let justice_package = PackageTemplate::build_package(
+ htlc_txid, idx as u32, PackageSolvingData::RevokedOutput(revk_outp),
+ height + self.counterparty_commitment_params.on_counterparty_tx_csv as u32, true, height
+ );
+ claimable_outpoints.push(justice_package);
+ if outputs_to_watch.is_none() {
+ outputs_to_watch = Some((htlc_txid, vec![]));
+ }
+ outputs_to_watch.as_mut().unwrap().1.push((idx as u32, tx.output[idx].clone()));
+ }
+ }
+ (claimable_outpoints, outputs_to_watch)
}
- // Returns (1) `PackageTemplate`s that can be given to the OnChainTxHandler, so that the handler can
+ // Returns (1) `PackageTemplate`s that can be given to the OnchainTxHandler, so that the handler can
// broadcast transactions claiming holder HTLC commitment outputs and (2) a holder revokable
// script so we can detect whether a holder transaction has been seen on-chain.
fn get_broadcasted_holder_claims(&self, holder_tx: &HolderSignedTx, conf_height: u32) -> (Vec<PackageTemplate>, Option<(Script, PublicKey, PublicKey)>) {
for &(ref htlc, _, _) in holder_tx.htlc_outputs.iter() {
if let Some(transaction_output_index) = htlc.transaction_output_index {
- let htlc_output = if htlc.offered {
- HolderHTLCOutput::build_offered(htlc.amount_msat, htlc.cltv_expiry)
+ let (htlc_output, aggregable) = if htlc.offered {
+ let htlc_output = HolderHTLCOutput::build_offered(
+ htlc.amount_msat, htlc.cltv_expiry, self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors()
+ );
+ (htlc_output, false)
+ } else {
+ let payment_preimage = if let Some(preimage) = self.payment_preimages.get(&htlc.payment_hash) {
+ preimage.clone()
} else {
- let payment_preimage = if let Some(preimage) = self.payment_preimages.get(&htlc.payment_hash) {
- preimage.clone()
- } else {
- // We can't build an HTLC-Success transaction without the preimage
- continue;
- };
- HolderHTLCOutput::build_accepted(payment_preimage, htlc.amount_msat)
+ // We can't build an HTLC-Success transaction without the preimage
+ continue;
};
- let htlc_package = PackageTemplate::build_package(holder_tx.txid, transaction_output_index, PackageSolvingData::HolderHTLCOutput(htlc_output), htlc.cltv_expiry, false, conf_height);
+ let htlc_output = HolderHTLCOutput::build_accepted(
+ payment_preimage, htlc.amount_msat, self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors()
+ );
+ (htlc_output, self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors())
+ };
+ let htlc_package = PackageTemplate::build_package(
+ holder_tx.txid, transaction_output_index,
+ PackageSolvingData::HolderHTLCOutput(htlc_output),
+ htlc.cltv_expiry, aggregable, conf_height
+ );
claim_requests.push(htlc_package);
}
}
/// revoked using data in holder_claimable_outpoints.
/// Should not be used if check_spend_revoked_transaction succeeds.
/// Returns None unless the transaction is definitely one of our commitment transactions.
- fn check_spend_holder_transaction<L: Deref>(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, logger: &L) -> Option<(Vec<PackageTemplate>, TransactionOutputs)> where L::Target: Logger {
+ fn check_spend_holder_transaction<L: Deref>(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, block_hash: &BlockHash, logger: &L) -> Option<(Vec<PackageTemplate>, TransactionOutputs)> where L::Target: Logger {
let commitment_txid = tx.txid();
let mut claim_requests = Vec::new();
let mut watch_outputs = Vec::new();
let res = self.get_broadcasted_holder_claims(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx, height);
let mut to_watch = self.get_broadcasted_holder_watch_outputs(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx, tx);
append_onchain_update!(res, to_watch);
- fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "latest holder", commitment_txid, height,
- self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter()
+ fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "latest holder", commitment_txid, tx, height,
+ block_hash, self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter()
.map(|(htlc, _, htlc_source)| (htlc, htlc_source.as_ref())), logger);
} else if let &Some(ref holder_tx) = &self.prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx {
if holder_tx.txid == commitment_txid {
let res = self.get_broadcasted_holder_claims(holder_tx, height);
let mut to_watch = self.get_broadcasted_holder_watch_outputs(holder_tx, tx);
append_onchain_update!(res, to_watch);
- fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "previous holder", commitment_txid, height,
+ fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "previous holder", commitment_txid, tx, height, block_hash,
holder_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|(htlc, _, htlc_source)| (htlc, htlc_source.as_ref())),
logger);
}
let commitment_tx = self.onchain_tx_handler.get_fully_signed_holder_tx(&self.funding_redeemscript);
let txid = commitment_tx.txid();
let mut holder_transactions = vec![commitment_tx];
+ // When anchor outputs are present, the HTLC transactions are only valid once the commitment
+ // transaction confirms.
+ if self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors() {
+ return holder_transactions;
+ }
for htlc in self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter() {
if let Some(vout) = htlc.0.transaction_output_index {
let preimage = if !htlc.0.offered {
let commitment_tx = self.onchain_tx_handler.get_fully_signed_copy_holder_tx(&self.funding_redeemscript);
let txid = commitment_tx.txid();
let mut holder_transactions = vec![commitment_tx];
+ // When anchor outputs are present, the HTLC transactions are only final once the commitment
+ // transaction confirms due to the CSV 1 encumberance.
+ if self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors() {
+ return holder_transactions;
+ }
for htlc in self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter() {
if let Some(vout) = htlc.0.transaction_output_index {
let preimage = if !htlc.0.offered {
if height > self.best_block.height() {
self.best_block = BestBlock::new(block_hash, height);
- self.block_confirmed(height, vec![], vec![], vec![], &broadcaster, &fee_estimator, &logger)
+ self.block_confirmed(height, block_hash, vec![], vec![], vec![], &broadcaster, &fee_estimator, &logger)
} else if block_hash != self.best_block.block_hash() {
self.best_block = BestBlock::new(block_hash, height);
self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.retain(|ref entry| entry.height <= height);
let mut watch_outputs = Vec::new();
let mut claimable_outpoints = Vec::new();
- for tx in &txn_matched {
+ 'tx_iter: for tx in &txn_matched {
+ let txid = tx.txid();
+ // If a transaction has already been confirmed, ensure we don't bother processing it duplicatively.
+ if Some(txid) == self.funding_spend_confirmed {
+ log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
+ continue 'tx_iter;
+ }
+ for ev in self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter() {
+ if ev.txid == txid {
+ if let Some(conf_hash) = ev.block_hash {
+ assert_eq!(header.block_hash(), conf_hash,
+ "Transaction {} was already confirmed and is being re-confirmed in a different block.\n\
+ This indicates a severe bug in the transaction connection logic - a reorg should have been processed first!", ev.txid);
+ }
+ log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of confirming tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
+ continue 'tx_iter;
+ }
+ }
+ for htlc in self.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.iter() {
+ if Some(txid) == htlc.resolving_txid {
+ log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of HTLC resolution tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
+ continue 'tx_iter;
+ }
+ }
+ for spendable_txid in self.spendable_txids_confirmed.iter() {
+ if txid == *spendable_txid {
+ log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of spendable tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
+ continue 'tx_iter;
+ }
+ }
+
if tx.input.len() == 1 {
// Assuming our keys were not leaked (in which case we're screwed no matter what),
- // commitment transactions and HTLC transactions will all only ever have one input,
- // which is an easy way to filter out any potential non-matching txn for lazy
- // filters.
+ // commitment transactions and HTLC transactions will all only ever have one input
+ // (except for HTLC transactions for channels with anchor outputs), which is an easy
+ // way to filter out any potential non-matching txn for lazy filters.
let prevout = &tx.input[0].previous_output;
if prevout.txid == self.funding_info.0.txid && prevout.vout == self.funding_info.0.index as u32 {
let mut balance_spendable_csv = None;
log_info!(logger, "Channel {} closed by funding output spend in txid {}.",
- log_bytes!(self.funding_info.0.to_channel_id()), tx.txid());
+ log_bytes!(self.funding_info.0.to_channel_id()), txid);
self.funding_spend_seen = true;
- if (tx.input[0].sequence >> 8*3) as u8 == 0x80 && (tx.lock_time >> 8*3) as u8 == 0x20 {
- let (mut new_outpoints, new_outputs) = self.check_spend_counterparty_transaction(&tx, height, &logger);
+ let mut commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output = None;
+ if (tx.input[0].sequence.0 >> 8*3) as u8 == 0x80 && (tx.lock_time.0 >> 8*3) as u8 == 0x20 {
+ let (mut new_outpoints, new_outputs, counterparty_output_idx_sats) =
+ self.check_spend_counterparty_transaction(&tx, height, &block_hash, &logger);
+ commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output = counterparty_output_idx_sats;
if !new_outputs.1.is_empty() {
watch_outputs.push(new_outputs);
}
claimable_outpoints.append(&mut new_outpoints);
if new_outpoints.is_empty() {
- if let Some((mut new_outpoints, new_outputs)) = self.check_spend_holder_transaction(&tx, height, &logger) {
+ if let Some((mut new_outpoints, new_outputs)) = self.check_spend_holder_transaction(&tx, height, &block_hash, &logger) {
+ debug_assert!(commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output.is_none(),
+ "A commitment transaction matched as both a counterparty and local commitment tx?");
if !new_outputs.1.is_empty() {
watch_outputs.push(new_outputs);
}
}
}
}
- let txid = tx.txid();
self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.push(OnchainEventEntry {
txid,
- height: height,
+ transaction: Some((*tx).clone()),
+ height,
+ block_hash: Some(block_hash),
event: OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation {
on_local_output_csv: balance_spendable_csv,
+ commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output,
},
});
- } else {
- if let Some(&commitment_number) = self.counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain.get(&prevout.txid) {
- let (mut new_outpoints, new_outputs_option) = self.check_spend_counterparty_htlc(&tx, commitment_number, height, &logger);
+ }
+ }
+ if tx.input.len() >= 1 {
+ // While all commitment transactions have one input, HTLC transactions may have more
+ // if the HTLC was present in an anchor channel. HTLCs can also be resolved in a few
+ // other ways which can have more than one output.
+ for tx_input in &tx.input {
+ let commitment_txid = tx_input.previous_output.txid;
+ if let Some(&commitment_number) = self.counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain.get(&commitment_txid) {
+ let (mut new_outpoints, new_outputs_option) = self.check_spend_counterparty_htlc(
+ &tx, commitment_number, &commitment_txid, height, &logger
+ );
claimable_outpoints.append(&mut new_outpoints);
if let Some(new_outputs) = new_outputs_option {
watch_outputs.push(new_outputs);
}
+ // Since there may be multiple HTLCs for this channel (all spending the
+ // same commitment tx) being claimed by the counterparty within the same
+ // transaction, and `check_spend_counterparty_htlc` already checks all the
+ // ones relevant to this channel, we can safely break from our loop.
+ break;
}
}
- }
- // While all commitment/HTLC-Success/HTLC-Timeout transactions have one input, HTLCs
- // can also be resolved in a few other ways which can have more than one output. Thus,
- // we call is_resolving_htlc_output here outside of the tx.input.len() == 1 check.
- self.is_resolving_htlc_output(&tx, height, &logger);
+ self.is_resolving_htlc_output(&tx, height, &block_hash, &logger);
- self.is_paying_spendable_output(&tx, height, &logger);
+ self.is_paying_spendable_output(&tx, height, &block_hash, &logger);
+ }
}
if height > self.best_block.height() {
self.best_block = BestBlock::new(block_hash, height);
}
- self.block_confirmed(height, txn_matched, watch_outputs, claimable_outpoints, &broadcaster, &fee_estimator, &logger)
+ self.block_confirmed(height, block_hash, txn_matched, watch_outputs, claimable_outpoints, &broadcaster, &fee_estimator, &logger)
}
/// Update state for new block(s)/transaction(s) confirmed. Note that the caller must update
/// `self.best_block` before calling if a new best blockchain tip is available. More
/// concretely, `self.best_block` must never be at a lower height than `conf_height`, avoiding
- /// complexity especially in `OnchainTx::update_claims_view`.
+ /// complexity especially in
+ /// `OnchainTx::update_claims_view_from_requests`/`OnchainTx::update_claims_view_from_matched_txn`.
///
/// `conf_height` should be set to the height at which any new transaction(s)/block(s) were
/// confirmed at, even if it is not the current best height.
fn block_confirmed<B: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref>(
&mut self,
conf_height: u32,
+ conf_hash: BlockHash,
txn_matched: Vec<&Transaction>,
mut watch_outputs: Vec<TransactionOutputs>,
mut claimable_outpoints: Vec<PackageTemplate>,
let should_broadcast = self.should_broadcast_holder_commitment_txn(logger);
if should_broadcast {
- let funding_outp = HolderFundingOutput::build(self.funding_redeemscript.clone());
+ let funding_outp = HolderFundingOutput::build(self.funding_redeemscript.clone(), self.channel_value_satoshis, self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors());
let commitment_package = PackageTemplate::build_package(self.funding_info.0.txid.clone(), self.funding_info.0.index as u32, PackageSolvingData::HolderFundingOutput(funding_outp), self.best_block.height(), false, self.best_block.height());
claimable_outpoints.push(commitment_package);
self.pending_monitor_events.push(MonitorEvent::CommitmentTxConfirmed(self.funding_info.0));
let commitment_tx = self.onchain_tx_handler.get_fully_signed_holder_tx(&self.funding_redeemscript);
self.holder_tx_signed = true;
- // Because we're broadcasting a commitment transaction, we should construct the package
- // assuming it gets confirmed in the next block. Sadly, we have code which considers
- // "not yet confirmed" things as discardable, so we cannot do that here.
- let (mut new_outpoints, _) = self.get_broadcasted_holder_claims(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx, self.best_block.height());
- let new_outputs = self.get_broadcasted_holder_watch_outputs(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx, &commitment_tx);
- if !new_outputs.is_empty() {
- watch_outputs.push((self.current_holder_commitment_tx.txid.clone(), new_outputs));
+ // We can't broadcast our HTLC transactions while the commitment transaction is
+ // unconfirmed. We'll delay doing so until we detect the confirmed commitment in
+ // `transactions_confirmed`.
+ if !self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors() {
+ // Because we're broadcasting a commitment transaction, we should construct the package
+ // assuming it gets confirmed in the next block. Sadly, we have code which considers
+ // "not yet confirmed" things as discardable, so we cannot do that here.
+ let (mut new_outpoints, _) = self.get_broadcasted_holder_claims(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx, self.best_block.height());
+ let new_outputs = self.get_broadcasted_holder_watch_outputs(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx, &commitment_tx);
+ if !new_outputs.is_empty() {
+ watch_outputs.push((self.current_holder_commitment_tx.txid.clone(), new_outputs));
+ }
+ claimable_outpoints.append(&mut new_outpoints);
}
- claimable_outpoints.append(&mut new_outpoints);
}
// Find which on-chain events have reached their confirmation threshold.
source: source.clone(),
htlc_value_satoshis,
}));
- if let Some(idx) = commitment_tx_output_idx {
- self.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.push(IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC { commitment_tx_output_idx: idx, payment_preimage: None });
- }
+ self.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.push(IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC {
+ commitment_tx_output_idx,
+ resolving_txid: Some(entry.txid),
+ resolving_tx: entry.transaction,
+ payment_preimage: None,
+ });
},
OnchainEvent::MaturingOutput { descriptor } => {
log_debug!(logger, "Descriptor {} has got enough confirmations to be passed upstream", log_spendable!(descriptor));
self.pending_events.push(Event::SpendableOutputs {
outputs: vec![descriptor]
});
+ self.spendable_txids_confirmed.push(entry.txid);
},
OnchainEvent::HTLCSpendConfirmation { commitment_tx_output_idx, preimage, .. } => {
- self.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.push(IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC { commitment_tx_output_idx, payment_preimage: preimage });
+ self.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.push(IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC {
+ commitment_tx_output_idx: Some(commitment_tx_output_idx),
+ resolving_txid: Some(entry.txid),
+ resolving_tx: entry.transaction,
+ payment_preimage: preimage,
+ });
},
- OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { .. } => {
+ OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output, .. } => {
self.funding_spend_confirmed = Some(entry.txid);
+ self.confirmed_commitment_tx_counterparty_output = commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output;
},
}
}
- self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view(&txn_matched, claimable_outpoints, conf_height, self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger);
+ self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view_from_requests(claimable_outpoints, conf_height, self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger);
+ self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view_from_matched_txn(&txn_matched, conf_height, conf_hash, self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger);
// Determine new outputs to watch by comparing against previously known outputs to watch,
// updating the latter in the process.
F::Target: FeeEstimator,
L::Target: Logger,
{
- self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.retain(|ref entry| if entry.txid == *txid {
- log_info!(logger, "Removing onchain event with txid {}", txid);
- false
- } else { true });
+ let mut removed_height = None;
+ for entry in self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter() {
+ if entry.txid == *txid {
+ removed_height = Some(entry.height);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if let Some(removed_height) = removed_height {
+ log_info!(logger, "transaction_unconfirmed of txid {} implies height {} was reorg'd out", txid, removed_height);
+ self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.retain(|ref entry| if entry.height >= removed_height {
+ log_info!(logger, "Transaction {} reorg'd out", entry.txid);
+ false
+ } else { true });
+ }
+
+ debug_assert!(!self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().any(|ref entry| entry.txid == *txid));
+
self.onchain_tx_handler.transaction_unconfirmed(txid, broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger);
}
}
fn should_broadcast_holder_commitment_txn<L: Deref>(&self, logger: &L) -> bool where L::Target: Logger {
+ // There's no need to broadcast our commitment transaction if we've seen one confirmed (even
+ // with 1 confirmation) as it'll be rejected as duplicate/conflicting.
+ if self.funding_spend_confirmed.is_some() ||
+ self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find(|event| match event.event {
+ OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { .. } => true,
+ _ => false,
+ }).is_some()
+ {
+ return false;
+ }
// We need to consider all HTLCs which are:
// * in any unrevoked counterparty commitment transaction, as they could broadcast said
// transactions and we'd end up in a race, or
/// Check if any transaction broadcasted is resolving HTLC output by a success or timeout on a holder
/// or counterparty commitment tx, if so send back the source, preimage if found and payment_hash of resolved HTLC
- fn is_resolving_htlc_output<L: Deref>(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, logger: &L) where L::Target: Logger {
+ fn is_resolving_htlc_output<L: Deref>(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, block_hash: &BlockHash, logger: &L) where L::Target: Logger {
'outer_loop: for input in &tx.input {
let mut payment_data = None;
- let witness_items = input.witness.len();
- let htlctype = input.witness.last().map(|w| w.len()).and_then(HTLCType::scriptlen_to_htlctype);
- let prev_last_witness_len = input.witness.second_to_last().map(|w| w.len()).unwrap_or(0);
- let revocation_sig_claim = (witness_items == 3 && htlctype == Some(HTLCType::OfferedHTLC) && prev_last_witness_len == 33)
- || (witness_items == 3 && htlctype == Some(HTLCType::AcceptedHTLC) && prev_last_witness_len == 33);
- let accepted_preimage_claim = witness_items == 5 && htlctype == Some(HTLCType::AcceptedHTLC)
- && input.witness.second_to_last().unwrap().len() == 32;
+ let htlc_claim = HTLCClaim::from_witness(&input.witness);
+ let revocation_sig_claim = htlc_claim == Some(HTLCClaim::Revocation);
+ let accepted_preimage_claim = htlc_claim == Some(HTLCClaim::AcceptedPreimage);
#[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
- let accepted_timeout_claim = witness_items == 3 && htlctype == Some(HTLCType::AcceptedHTLC) && !revocation_sig_claim;
- let offered_preimage_claim = witness_items == 3 && htlctype == Some(HTLCType::OfferedHTLC) &&
- !revocation_sig_claim && input.witness.second_to_last().unwrap().len() == 32;
-
+ let accepted_timeout_claim = htlc_claim == Some(HTLCClaim::AcceptedTimeout);
+ let offered_preimage_claim = htlc_claim == Some(HTLCClaim::OfferedPreimage);
#[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
- let offered_timeout_claim = witness_items == 5 && htlctype == Some(HTLCType::OfferedHTLC);
+ let offered_timeout_claim = htlc_claim == Some(HTLCClaim::OfferedTimeout);
let mut payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([0; 32]);
- if accepted_preimage_claim {
- payment_preimage.0.copy_from_slice(input.witness.second_to_last().unwrap());
- } else if offered_preimage_claim {
+ if offered_preimage_claim || accepted_preimage_claim {
payment_preimage.0.copy_from_slice(input.witness.second_to_last().unwrap());
}
log_error!(logger, "Input spending {} ({}:{}) in {} resolves {} HTLC with payment hash {} with {}!",
$tx_info, input.previous_output.txid, input.previous_output.vout, tx.txid(),
if outbound_htlc { "outbound" } else { "inbound" }, log_bytes!($htlc.payment_hash.0),
- if revocation_sig_claim { "revocation sig" } else { "preimage claim after we'd passed the HTLC resolution back" });
+ if revocation_sig_claim { "revocation sig" } else { "preimage claim after we'd passed the HTLC resolution back. We can likely claim the HTLC output with a revocation claim" });
} else {
log_info!(logger, "Input spending {} ({}:{}) in {} resolves {} HTLC with payment hash {} with {}",
$tx_info, input.previous_output.txid, input.previous_output.vout, tx.txid(),
if payment_data.is_none() {
log_claim!($tx_info, $holder_tx, htlc_output, false);
let outbound_htlc = $holder_tx == htlc_output.offered;
- if !outbound_htlc || revocation_sig_claim {
- self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.push(OnchainEventEntry {
- txid: tx.txid(), height,
- event: OnchainEvent::HTLCSpendConfirmation {
- commitment_tx_output_idx: input.previous_output.vout,
- preimage: if accepted_preimage_claim || offered_preimage_claim {
- Some(payment_preimage) } else { None },
- // If this is a payment to us (!outbound_htlc, above),
- // wait for the CSV delay before dropping the HTLC from
- // claimable balance if the claim was an HTLC-Success
- // transaction.
- on_to_local_output_csv: if accepted_preimage_claim {
- Some(self.on_holder_tx_csv) } else { None },
- },
- });
- } else {
- // Outbound claims should always have payment_data, unless
- // we've already failed the HTLC as the commitment transaction
- // which was broadcasted was revoked. In that case, we should
- // spend the HTLC output here immediately, and expose that fact
- // as a Balance, something which we do not yet do.
- // TODO: Track the above as claimable!
- }
+ self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.push(OnchainEventEntry {
+ txid: tx.txid(), height, block_hash: Some(*block_hash), transaction: Some(tx.clone()),
+ event: OnchainEvent::HTLCSpendConfirmation {
+ commitment_tx_output_idx: input.previous_output.vout,
+ preimage: if accepted_preimage_claim || offered_preimage_claim {
+ Some(payment_preimage) } else { None },
+ // If this is a payment to us (ie !outbound_htlc), wait for
+ // the CSV delay before dropping the HTLC from claimable
+ // balance if the claim was an HTLC-Success transaction (ie
+ // accepted_preimage_claim).
+ on_to_local_output_csv: if accepted_preimage_claim && !outbound_htlc {
+ Some(self.on_holder_tx_csv) } else { None },
+ },
+ });
continue 'outer_loop;
}
}
self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.push(OnchainEventEntry {
txid: tx.txid(),
height,
+ block_hash: Some(*block_hash),
+ transaction: Some(tx.clone()),
event: OnchainEvent::HTLCSpendConfirmation {
commitment_tx_output_idx: input.previous_output.vout,
preimage: Some(payment_preimage),
} else { false }) {
self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.push(OnchainEventEntry {
txid: tx.txid(),
+ transaction: Some(tx.clone()),
height,
+ block_hash: Some(*block_hash),
event: OnchainEvent::HTLCSpendConfirmation {
commitment_tx_output_idx: input.previous_output.vout,
preimage: Some(payment_preimage),
});
let entry = OnchainEventEntry {
txid: tx.txid(),
+ transaction: Some(tx.clone()),
height,
+ block_hash: Some(*block_hash),
event: OnchainEvent::HTLCUpdate {
source, payment_hash,
htlc_value_satoshis: Some(amount_msat / 1000),
}
/// Check if any transaction broadcasted is paying fund back to some address we can assume to own
- fn is_paying_spendable_output<L: Deref>(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, logger: &L) where L::Target: Logger {
+ fn is_paying_spendable_output<L: Deref>(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, block_hash: &BlockHash, logger: &L) where L::Target: Logger {
let mut spendable_output = None;
for (i, outp) in tx.output.iter().enumerate() { // There is max one spendable output for any channel tx, including ones generated by us
if i > ::core::u16::MAX as usize {
if let Some(spendable_output) = spendable_output {
let entry = OnchainEventEntry {
txid: tx.txid(),
- height: height,
+ transaction: Some(tx.clone()),
+ height,
+ block_hash: Some(*block_hash),
event: OnchainEvent::MaturingOutput { descriptor: spendable_output.clone() },
};
log_info!(logger, "Received spendable output {}, spendable at height {}", log_spendable!(spendable_output), entry.confirmation_threshold());
self.0.best_block_updated(header, height, &*self.1, &*self.2, &*self.3);
}
- fn get_relevant_txids(&self) -> Vec<Txid> {
+ fn get_relevant_txids(&self) -> Vec<(Txid, Option<BlockHash>)> {
self.0.get_relevant_txids()
}
}
const MAX_ALLOC_SIZE: usize = 64*1024;
-impl<'a, Signer: Sign, K: KeysInterface<Signer = Signer>> ReadableArgs<&'a K>
- for (BlockHash, ChannelMonitor<Signer>) {
- fn read<R: io::Read>(reader: &mut R, keys_manager: &'a K) -> Result<Self, DecodeError> {
+impl<'a, 'b, ES: EntropySource, SP: SignerProvider> ReadableArgs<(&'a ES, &'b SP)>
+ for (BlockHash, ChannelMonitor<SP::Signer>) {
+ fn read<R: io::Read>(reader: &mut R, args: (&'a ES, &'b SP)) -> Result<Self, DecodeError> {
macro_rules! unwrap_obj {
($key: expr) => {
match $key {
}
}
+ let (entropy_source, signer_provider) = args;
+
let _ver = read_ver_prefix!(reader, SERIALIZATION_VERSION);
let latest_update_id: u64 = Readable::read(reader)?;
return Err(DecodeError::InvalidValue);
}
}
- let onchain_tx_handler: OnchainTxHandler<Signer> = ReadableArgs::read(reader, keys_manager)?;
+ let onchain_tx_handler: OnchainTxHandler<SP::Signer> = ReadableArgs::read(
+ reader, (entropy_source, signer_provider, channel_value_satoshis, channel_keys_id)
+ )?;
let lockdown_from_offchain = Readable::read(reader)?;
let holder_tx_signed = Readable::read(reader)?;
let mut htlcs_resolved_on_chain = Some(Vec::new());
let mut funding_spend_seen = Some(false);
let mut counterparty_node_id = None;
+ let mut confirmed_commitment_tx_counterparty_output = None;
+ let mut spendable_txids_confirmed = Some(Vec::new());
read_tlv_fields!(reader, {
(1, funding_spend_confirmed, option),
(3, htlcs_resolved_on_chain, vec_type),
(5, pending_monitor_events, vec_type),
(7, funding_spend_seen, option),
(9, counterparty_node_id, option),
+ (11, confirmed_commitment_tx_counterparty_output, option),
+ (13, spendable_txids_confirmed, vec_type),
});
let mut secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
- secp_ctx.seeded_randomize(&keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes());
-
- Ok((best_block.block_hash(), ChannelMonitor {
- inner: Mutex::new(ChannelMonitorImpl {
- latest_update_id,
- commitment_transaction_number_obscure_factor,
-
- destination_script,
- broadcasted_holder_revokable_script,
- counterparty_payment_script,
- shutdown_script,
-
- channel_keys_id,
- holder_revocation_basepoint,
- funding_info,
- current_counterparty_commitment_txid,
- prev_counterparty_commitment_txid,
-
- counterparty_commitment_params,
- funding_redeemscript,
- channel_value_satoshis,
- their_cur_per_commitment_points,
-
- on_holder_tx_csv,
-
- commitment_secrets,
- counterparty_claimable_outpoints,
- counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain,
- counterparty_hash_commitment_number,
-
- prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx,
- current_holder_commitment_tx,
- current_counterparty_commitment_number,
- current_holder_commitment_number,
-
- payment_preimages,
- pending_monitor_events: pending_monitor_events.unwrap(),
- pending_events,
-
- onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf,
- outputs_to_watch,
-
- onchain_tx_handler,
-
- lockdown_from_offchain,
- holder_tx_signed,
- funding_spend_seen: funding_spend_seen.unwrap(),
- funding_spend_confirmed,
- htlcs_resolved_on_chain: htlcs_resolved_on_chain.unwrap(),
-
- best_block,
- counterparty_node_id,
-
- secp_ctx,
- }),
- }))
+ secp_ctx.seeded_randomize(&entropy_source.get_secure_random_bytes());
+
+ Ok((best_block.block_hash(), ChannelMonitor::from_impl(ChannelMonitorImpl {
+ latest_update_id,
+ commitment_transaction_number_obscure_factor,
+
+ destination_script,
+ broadcasted_holder_revokable_script,
+ counterparty_payment_script,
+ shutdown_script,
+
+ channel_keys_id,
+ holder_revocation_basepoint,
+ funding_info,
+ current_counterparty_commitment_txid,
+ prev_counterparty_commitment_txid,
+
+ counterparty_commitment_params,
+ funding_redeemscript,
+ channel_value_satoshis,
+ their_cur_per_commitment_points,
+
+ on_holder_tx_csv,
+
+ commitment_secrets,
+ counterparty_claimable_outpoints,
+ counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain,
+ counterparty_hash_commitment_number,
+
+ prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx,
+ current_holder_commitment_tx,
+ current_counterparty_commitment_number,
+ current_holder_commitment_number,
+
+ payment_preimages,
+ pending_monitor_events: pending_monitor_events.unwrap(),
+ pending_events,
+
+ onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf,
+ outputs_to_watch,
+
+ onchain_tx_handler,
+
+ lockdown_from_offchain,
+ holder_tx_signed,
+ funding_spend_seen: funding_spend_seen.unwrap(),
+ funding_spend_confirmed,
+ confirmed_commitment_tx_counterparty_output,
+ htlcs_resolved_on_chain: htlcs_resolved_on_chain.unwrap(),
+ spendable_txids_confirmed: spendable_txids_confirmed.unwrap(),
+
+ best_block,
+ counterparty_node_id,
+
+ secp_ctx,
+ })))
}
}
use crate::chain::chaininterface::LowerBoundedFeeEstimator;
use super::ChannelMonitorUpdateStep;
- use ::{check_added_monitors, check_closed_broadcast, check_closed_event, check_spends, get_local_commitment_txn, get_monitor, get_route_and_payment_hash, unwrap_send_err};
- use chain::{BestBlock, Confirm};
- use chain::channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor;
- use chain::package::{weight_offered_htlc, weight_received_htlc, weight_revoked_offered_htlc, weight_revoked_received_htlc, WEIGHT_REVOKED_OUTPUT};
- use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
- use chain::keysinterface::InMemorySigner;
- use ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash};
- use ln::chan_utils;
- use ln::chan_utils::{HTLCOutputInCommitment, ChannelPublicKeys, ChannelTransactionParameters, HolderCommitmentTransaction, CounterpartyChannelTransactionParameters};
- use ln::channelmanager::PaymentSendFailure;
- use ln::features::InitFeatures;
- use ln::functional_test_utils::*;
- use ln::script::ShutdownScript;
- use util::errors::APIError;
- use util::events::{ClosureReason, MessageSendEventsProvider};
- use util::test_utils::{TestLogger, TestBroadcaster, TestFeeEstimator};
- use util::ser::{ReadableArgs, Writeable};
- use sync::{Arc, Mutex};
- use io;
- use bitcoin::Witness;
- use prelude::*;
+ use crate::{check_added_monitors, check_closed_broadcast, check_closed_event, check_spends, get_local_commitment_txn, get_monitor, get_route_and_payment_hash, unwrap_send_err};
+ use crate::chain::{BestBlock, Confirm};
+ use crate::chain::channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor;
+ use crate::chain::package::{weight_offered_htlc, weight_received_htlc, weight_revoked_offered_htlc, weight_revoked_received_htlc, WEIGHT_REVOKED_OUTPUT};
+ use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
+ use crate::chain::keysinterface::InMemorySigner;
+ use crate::ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash};
+ use crate::ln::chan_utils;
+ use crate::ln::chan_utils::{HTLCOutputInCommitment, ChannelPublicKeys, ChannelTransactionParameters, HolderCommitmentTransaction, CounterpartyChannelTransactionParameters};
+ use crate::ln::channelmanager::{PaymentSendFailure, PaymentId};
+ use crate::ln::functional_test_utils::*;
+ use crate::ln::script::ShutdownScript;
+ use crate::util::errors::APIError;
+ use crate::util::events::{ClosureReason, MessageSendEventsProvider};
+ use crate::util::test_utils::{TestLogger, TestBroadcaster, TestFeeEstimator};
+ use crate::util::ser::{ReadableArgs, Writeable};
+ use crate::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
+ use crate::io;
+ use bitcoin::{PackedLockTime, Sequence, TxMerkleNode, Witness};
+ use crate::prelude::*;
fn do_test_funding_spend_refuses_updates(use_local_txn: bool) {
// Previously, monitor updates were allowed freely even after a funding-spend transaction
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
- let channel = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(
- &nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- create_announced_chan_between_nodes(
- &nodes, 1, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let channel = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
// Rebalance somewhat
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 10_000_000);
let new_header = BlockHeader {
version: 2, time: 0, bits: 0, nonce: 0,
prev_blockhash: nodes[0].best_block_info().0,
- merkle_root: Default::default() };
+ merkle_root: TxMerkleNode::all_zeros() };
let conf_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1;
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.transactions_confirmed(&new_header,
&[(0, broadcast_tx)], conf_height);
let (_, pre_update_monitor) = <(BlockHash, ChannelMonitor<InMemorySigner>)>::read(
&mut io::Cursor::new(&get_monitor!(nodes[1], channel.2).encode()),
- &nodes[1].keys_manager.backing).unwrap();
+ (&nodes[1].keys_manager.backing, &nodes[1].keys_manager.backing)).unwrap();
// If the ChannelManager tries to update the channel, however, the ChainMonitor will pass
// the update through to the ChannelMonitor which will refuse it (as the channel is closed).
let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 100_000);
- unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)),
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)),
true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
assert!(err.contains("ChannelMonitor storage failure")));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2); // After the failure we generate a close-channel monitor update
let broadcaster = TestBroadcaster::new(Arc::clone(&nodes[1].blocks));
assert!(
- pre_update_monitor.update_monitor(&replay_update, &&broadcaster, &&chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator, &nodes[1].logger)
+ pre_update_monitor.update_monitor(&replay_update, &&broadcaster, &chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator, &nodes[1].logger)
.is_err());
// Even though we error'd on the first update, we should still have generated an HTLC claim
// transaction
let fee_estimator = TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) };
let dummy_key = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap());
- let dummy_tx = Transaction { version: 0, lock_time: 0, input: Vec::new(), output: Vec::new() };
+ let dummy_tx = Transaction { version: 0, lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO, input: Vec::new(), output: Vec::new() };
let mut preimages = Vec::new();
{
SecretKey::from_slice(&[41; 32]).unwrap(),
SecretKey::from_slice(&[41; 32]).unwrap(),
SecretKey::from_slice(&[41; 32]).unwrap(),
- SecretKey::from_slice(&[41; 32]).unwrap(),
[41; 32],
0,
- [0; 32]
+ [0; 32],
);
let counterparty_pubkeys = ChannelPublicKeys {
delayed_payment_basepoint: PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[47; 32]).unwrap()),
htlc_basepoint: PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[48; 32]).unwrap())
};
- let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: Default::default(), index: u16::max_value() };
+ let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: Txid::all_zeros(), index: u16::max_value() };
let channel_parameters = ChannelTransactionParameters {
holder_pubkeys: keys.holder_channel_pubkeys.clone(),
holder_selected_contest_delay: 66,
}),
funding_outpoint: Some(funding_outpoint),
opt_anchors: None,
+ opt_non_zero_fee_anchors: None,
};
// Prune with one old state and a holder commitment tx holding a few overlaps with the
// old state.
// Justice tx with 1 to_holder, 2 revoked offered HTLCs, 1 revoked received HTLCs
for &opt_anchors in [false, true].iter() {
- let mut claim_tx = Transaction { version: 0, lock_time: 0, input: Vec::new(), output: Vec::new() };
+ let mut claim_tx = Transaction { version: 0, lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO, input: Vec::new(), output: Vec::new() };
let mut sum_actual_sigs = 0;
for i in 0..4 {
claim_tx.input.push(TxIn {
vout: i,
},
script_sig: Script::new(),
- sequence: 0xfffffffd,
+ sequence: Sequence::ENABLE_RBF_NO_LOCKTIME,
witness: Witness::new(),
});
}
// Claim tx with 1 offered HTLCs, 3 received HTLCs
for &opt_anchors in [false, true].iter() {
- let mut claim_tx = Transaction { version: 0, lock_time: 0, input: Vec::new(), output: Vec::new() };
+ let mut claim_tx = Transaction { version: 0, lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO, input: Vec::new(), output: Vec::new() };
let mut sum_actual_sigs = 0;
for i in 0..4 {
claim_tx.input.push(TxIn {
vout: i,
},
script_sig: Script::new(),
- sequence: 0xfffffffd,
+ sequence: Sequence::ENABLE_RBF_NO_LOCKTIME,
witness: Witness::new(),
});
}
// Justice tx with 1 revoked HTLC-Success tx output
for &opt_anchors in [false, true].iter() {
- let mut claim_tx = Transaction { version: 0, lock_time: 0, input: Vec::new(), output: Vec::new() };
+ let mut claim_tx = Transaction { version: 0, lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO, input: Vec::new(), output: Vec::new() };
let mut sum_actual_sigs = 0;
claim_tx.input.push(TxIn {
previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint {
vout: 0,
},
script_sig: Script::new(),
- sequence: 0xfffffffd,
+ sequence: Sequence::ENABLE_RBF_NO_LOCKTIME,
witness: Witness::new(),
});
claim_tx.output.push(TxOut {