Avoid redundant broadcast of local commitment transaction
[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / chain / channelmonitor.rs
index 684824ee359686d97e8547a5cf625ac71d968546..db17810599d66e4d472d96ec96af76f1ced407f3 100644 (file)
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ use crate::util::ser::{Readable, ReadableArgs, MaybeReadable, Writer, Writeable,
 use crate::util::byte_utils;
 use crate::util::events::Event;
 #[cfg(anchors)]
-use crate::util::events::{AnchorDescriptor, BumpTransactionEvent};
+use crate::util::events::{AnchorDescriptor, HTLCDescriptor, BumpTransactionEvent};
 
 use crate::prelude::*;
 use core::{cmp, mem};
@@ -2325,6 +2325,17 @@ impl<Signer: Sign> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {
                                        log_trace!(logger, "Updating ChannelMonitor: channel force closed, should broadcast: {}", should_broadcast);
                                        self.lockdown_from_offchain = true;
                                        if *should_broadcast {
+                                               // There's no need to broadcast our commitment transaction if we've seen one
+                                               // confirmed (even with 1 confirmation) as it'll be rejected as
+                                               // duplicate/conflicting.
+                                               let detected_funding_spend = self.funding_spend_confirmed.is_some() ||
+                                                       self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find(|event| match event.event {
+                                                               OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { .. } => true,
+                                                               _ => false,
+                                                       }).is_some();
+                                               if detected_funding_spend {
+                                                       continue;
+                                               }
                                                self.broadcast_latest_holder_commitment_txn(broadcaster, logger);
                                                // If the channel supports anchor outputs, we'll need to emit an external
                                                // event to be consumed such that a child transaction is broadcast with a
@@ -2425,6 +2436,27 @@ impl<Signer: Sign> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {
                                                pending_htlcs,
                                        }));
                                },
+                               ClaimEvent::BumpHTLC {
+                                       target_feerate_sat_per_1000_weight, htlcs,
+                               } => {
+                                       let mut htlc_descriptors = Vec::with_capacity(htlcs.len());
+                                       for htlc in htlcs {
+                                               htlc_descriptors.push(HTLCDescriptor {
+                                                       channel_keys_id: self.channel_keys_id,
+                                                       channel_value_satoshis: self.channel_value_satoshis,
+                                                       channel_parameters: self.onchain_tx_handler.channel_transaction_parameters.clone(),
+                                                       commitment_txid: htlc.commitment_txid,
+                                                       per_commitment_number: htlc.per_commitment_number,
+                                                       htlc: htlc.htlc,
+                                                       preimage: htlc.preimage,
+                                                       counterparty_sig: htlc.counterparty_sig,
+                                               });
+                                       }
+                                       ret.push(Event::BumpTransaction(BumpTransactionEvent::HTLCResolution {
+                                               target_feerate_sat_per_1000_weight,
+                                               htlc_descriptors,
+                                       }));
+                               }
                        }
                }
                ret
@@ -3011,10 +3043,10 @@ impl<Signer: Sign> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {
                                                if let Some(new_outputs) = new_outputs_option {
                                                        watch_outputs.push(new_outputs);
                                                }
-                                               // Since there may be multiple HTLCs (all from the same commitment) being
-                                               // claimed by the counterparty within the same transaction, and
-                                               // `check_spend_counterparty_htlc` already checks for all of them, we can
-                                               // safely break from our loop.
+                                               // Since there may be multiple HTLCs for this channel (all spending the
+                                               // same commitment tx) being claimed by the counterparty within the same
+                                               // transaction, and `check_spend_counterparty_htlc` already checks all the
+                                               // ones relevant to this channel, we can safely break from our loop.
                                                break;
                                        }
                                }