// remove it once it reaches the confirmation threshold, or to generate a new claim if the
// transaction is reorged out.
let mut all_inputs_have_confirmed_spend = true;
- for outpoint in &request_outpoints {
- if let Some(first_claim_txid_height) = self.claimable_outpoints.get(outpoint) {
+ for outpoint in request_outpoints.iter() {
+ if let Some(first_claim_txid_height) = self.claimable_outpoints.get(*outpoint) {
// We check for outpoint spends within claims individually rather than as a set
// since requests can have outpoints split off.
if !self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter()
for outpoint in request.outpoints() {
log_debug!(logger, "Removing claim tracking for {} due to maturation of claim package {}.",
outpoint, log_bytes!(package_id));
- self.claimable_outpoints.remove(&outpoint);
+ self.claimable_outpoints.remove(outpoint);
#[cfg(anchors)]
self.pending_claim_events.remove(&package_id);
}
OnchainEvent::ContentiousOutpoint { package } => {
log_debug!(logger, "Removing claim tracking due to maturation of claim tx for outpoints:");
log_debug!(logger, " {:?}", package.outpoints());
- self.claimable_outpoints.remove(&package.outpoints()[0]);
+ self.claimable_outpoints.remove(package.outpoints()[0]);
}
}
} else {
//- resurect outpoint back in its claimable set and regenerate tx
match entry.event {
OnchainEvent::ContentiousOutpoint { package } => {
- if let Some(ancestor_claimable_txid) = self.claimable_outpoints.get(&package.outpoints()[0]) {
+ if let Some(ancestor_claimable_txid) = self.claimable_outpoints.get(package.outpoints()[0]) {
if let Some(request) = self.pending_claim_requests.get_mut(&ancestor_claimable_txid.0) {
request.merge_package(package);
// Using a HashMap guarantee us than if we have multiple outpoints getting