use crate::ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash};
use crate::ln::features::{ChannelTypeFeatures, InitFeatures};
use crate::ln::msgs;
-use crate::ln::msgs::{DecodeError, OptionalField, DataLossProtect};
+use crate::ln::msgs::DecodeError;
use crate::ln::script::{self, ShutdownScript};
use crate::ln::channelmanager::{self, CounterpartyForwardingInfo, PendingHTLCStatus, HTLCSource, SentHTLCId, HTLCFailureMsg, PendingHTLCInfo, RAACommitmentOrder, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA, MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT};
use crate::ln::chan_utils::{CounterpartyCommitmentSecrets, TxCreationKeys, HTLCOutputInCommitment, htlc_success_tx_weight, htlc_timeout_tx_weight, make_funding_redeemscript, ChannelPublicKeys, CommitmentTransaction, HolderCommitmentTransaction, ChannelTransactionParameters, CounterpartyChannelTransactionParameters, MAX_HTLCS, get_commitment_transaction_number_obscure_factor, ClosingTransaction};
let counterparty_shutdown_scriptpubkey = if their_features.supports_upfront_shutdown_script() {
match &msg.shutdown_scriptpubkey {
- &OptionalField::Present(ref script) => {
+ &Some(ref script) => {
// Peer is signaling upfront_shutdown and has opt-out with a 0-length script. We don't enforce anything
if script.len() == 0 {
None
}
},
// Peer is signaling upfront shutdown but don't opt-out with correct mechanism (a.k.a 0-length script). Peer looks buggy, we fail the channel
- &OptionalField::Absent => {
+ &None => {
return Err(ChannelError::Close("Peer is signaling upfront_shutdown but we don't get any script. Use 0-length script to opt-out".to_owned()));
}
}
let counterparty_shutdown_scriptpubkey = if their_features.supports_upfront_shutdown_script() {
match &msg.shutdown_scriptpubkey {
- &OptionalField::Present(ref script) => {
+ &Some(ref script) => {
// Peer is signaling upfront_shutdown and has opt-out with a 0-length script. We don't enforce anything
if script.len() == 0 {
None
}
},
// Peer is signaling upfront shutdown but don't opt-out with correct mechanism (a.k.a 0-length script). Peer looks buggy, we fail the channel
- &OptionalField::Absent => {
+ &None => {
return Err(ChannelError::Close("Peer is signaling upfront_shutdown but we don't get any script. Use 0-length script to opt-out".to_owned()));
}
}
}
if msg.next_remote_commitment_number > 0 {
- match msg.data_loss_protect {
- OptionalField::Present(ref data_loss) => {
- let expected_point = self.holder_signer.get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - msg.next_remote_commitment_number + 1, &self.secp_ctx);
- let given_secret = SecretKey::from_slice(&data_loss.your_last_per_commitment_secret)
- .map_err(|_| ChannelError::Close("Peer sent a garbage channel_reestablish with unparseable secret key".to_owned()))?;
- if expected_point != PublicKey::from_secret_key(&self.secp_ctx, &given_secret) {
- return Err(ChannelError::Close("Peer sent a garbage channel_reestablish with secret key not matching the commitment height provided".to_owned()));
+ let expected_point = self.holder_signer.get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - msg.next_remote_commitment_number + 1, &self.secp_ctx);
+ let given_secret = SecretKey::from_slice(&msg.your_last_per_commitment_secret)
+ .map_err(|_| ChannelError::Close("Peer sent a garbage channel_reestablish with unparseable secret key".to_owned()))?;
+ if expected_point != PublicKey::from_secret_key(&self.secp_ctx, &given_secret) {
+ return Err(ChannelError::Close("Peer sent a garbage channel_reestablish with secret key not matching the commitment height provided".to_owned()));
+ }
+ if msg.next_remote_commitment_number > INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - self.cur_holder_commitment_transaction_number {
+ macro_rules! log_and_panic {
+ ($err_msg: expr) => {
+ log_error!(logger, $err_msg, log_bytes!(self.channel_id), log_pubkey!(self.counterparty_node_id));
+ panic!($err_msg, log_bytes!(self.channel_id), log_pubkey!(self.counterparty_node_id));
}
- if msg.next_remote_commitment_number > INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - self.cur_holder_commitment_transaction_number {
- macro_rules! log_and_panic {
- ($err_msg: expr) => {
- log_error!(logger, $err_msg, log_bytes!(self.channel_id), log_pubkey!(self.counterparty_node_id));
- panic!($err_msg, log_bytes!(self.channel_id), log_pubkey!(self.counterparty_node_id));
- }
- }
- log_and_panic!("We have fallen behind - we have received proof that if we broadcast our counterparty is going to claim all our funds.\n\
- This implies you have restarted with lost ChannelMonitor and ChannelManager state, the first of which is a violation of the LDK chain::Watch requirements.\n\
- More specifically, this means you have a bug in your implementation that can cause loss of funds, or you are running with an old backup, which is unsafe.\n\
- If you have restored from an old backup and wish to force-close channels and return to operation, you should start up, call\n\
- ChannelManager::force_close_without_broadcasting_txn on channel {} with counterparty {} or\n\
- ChannelManager::force_close_all_channels_without_broadcasting_txn, then reconnect to peer(s).\n\
- Note that due to a long-standing bug in lnd you may have to reach out to peers running lnd-based nodes to ask them to manually force-close channels\n\
- See https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/issues/1565 for more info.");
- }
- },
- OptionalField::Absent => {}
+ }
+ log_and_panic!("We have fallen behind - we have received proof that if we broadcast our counterparty is going to claim all our funds.\n\
+ This implies you have restarted with lost ChannelMonitor and ChannelManager state, the first of which is a violation of the LDK chain::Watch requirements.\n\
+ More specifically, this means you have a bug in your implementation that can cause loss of funds, or you are running with an old backup, which is unsafe.\n\
+ If you have restored from an old backup and wish to force-close channels and return to operation, you should start up, call\n\
+ ChannelManager::force_close_without_broadcasting_txn on channel {} with counterparty {} or\n\
+ ChannelManager::force_close_all_channels_without_broadcasting_txn, then reconnect to peer(s).\n\
+ Note that due to a long-standing bug in lnd you may have to reach out to peers running lnd-based nodes to ask them to manually force-close channels\n\
+ See https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/issues/1565 for more info.");
}
}
htlc_basepoint: keys.htlc_basepoint,
first_per_commitment_point,
channel_flags: if self.config.announced_channel {1} else {0},
- shutdown_scriptpubkey: OptionalField::Present(match &self.shutdown_scriptpubkey {
+ shutdown_scriptpubkey: Some(match &self.shutdown_scriptpubkey {
Some(script) => script.clone().into_inner(),
None => Builder::new().into_script(),
}),
delayed_payment_basepoint: keys.delayed_payment_basepoint,
htlc_basepoint: keys.htlc_basepoint,
first_per_commitment_point,
- shutdown_scriptpubkey: OptionalField::Present(match &self.shutdown_scriptpubkey {
+ shutdown_scriptpubkey: Some(match &self.shutdown_scriptpubkey {
Some(script) => script.clone().into_inner(),
None => Builder::new().into_script(),
}),
// valid, and valid in fuzzing mode's arbitrary validity criteria:
let mut pk = [2; 33]; pk[1] = 0xff;
let dummy_pubkey = PublicKey::from_slice(&pk).unwrap();
- let data_loss_protect = if self.cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number + 1 < INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER {
+ let remote_last_secret = if self.cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number + 1 < INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER {
let remote_last_secret = self.commitment_secrets.get_secret(self.cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number + 2).unwrap();
log_trace!(logger, "Enough info to generate a Data Loss Protect with per_commitment_secret {} for channel {}", log_bytes!(remote_last_secret), log_bytes!(self.channel_id()));
- OptionalField::Present(DataLossProtect {
- your_last_per_commitment_secret: remote_last_secret,
- my_current_per_commitment_point: dummy_pubkey
- })
+ remote_last_secret
} else {
log_info!(logger, "Sending a data_loss_protect with no previous remote per_commitment_secret for channel {}", log_bytes!(self.channel_id()));
- OptionalField::Present(DataLossProtect {
- your_last_per_commitment_secret: [0;32],
- my_current_per_commitment_point: dummy_pubkey,
- })
+ [0;32]
};
msgs::ChannelReestablish {
channel_id: self.channel_id(),
// dropped this channel on disconnect as it hasn't yet reached FundingSent so we can't
// overflow here.
next_remote_commitment_number: INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - self.cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number - 1,
- data_loss_protect,
+ your_last_per_commitment_secret: remote_last_secret,
+ my_current_per_commitment_point: dummy_pubkey,
}
}
use crate::ln::channel::{Channel, InboundHTLCOutput, OutboundHTLCOutput, InboundHTLCState, OutboundHTLCState, HTLCCandidate, HTLCInitiator};
use crate::ln::channel::{MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO, TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS, MIN_THEIR_CHAN_RESERVE_SATOSHIS};
use crate::ln::features::ChannelTypeFeatures;
- use crate::ln::msgs::{ChannelUpdate, DataLossProtect, DecodeError, OptionalField, UnsignedChannelUpdate, MAX_VALUE_MSAT};
+ use crate::ln::msgs::{ChannelUpdate, DecodeError, UnsignedChannelUpdate, MAX_VALUE_MSAT};
use crate::ln::script::ShutdownScript;
use crate::ln::chan_utils;
use crate::ln::chan_utils::{htlc_success_tx_weight, htlc_timeout_tx_weight};
let msg = node_b_chan.get_channel_reestablish(&&logger);
assert_eq!(msg.next_local_commitment_number, 1); // now called next_commitment_number
assert_eq!(msg.next_remote_commitment_number, 0); // now called next_revocation_number
- match msg.data_loss_protect {
- OptionalField::Present(DataLossProtect { your_last_per_commitment_secret, .. }) => {
- assert_eq!(your_last_per_commitment_secret, [0; 32]);
- },
- _ => panic!()
- }
+ assert_eq!(msg.your_last_per_commitment_secret, [0; 32]);
// Check that the commitment point in Node A's channel_reestablish message
// is sane.
let msg = node_a_chan.get_channel_reestablish(&&logger);
assert_eq!(msg.next_local_commitment_number, 1); // now called next_commitment_number
assert_eq!(msg.next_remote_commitment_number, 0); // now called next_revocation_number
- match msg.data_loss_protect {
- OptionalField::Present(DataLossProtect { your_last_per_commitment_secret, .. }) => {
- assert_eq!(your_last_per_commitment_secret, [0; 32]);
- },
- _ => panic!()
- }
+ assert_eq!(msg.your_last_per_commitment_secret, [0; 32]);
}
#[test]
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff