use crate::ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash};
use crate::ln::features::{ChannelTypeFeatures, InitFeatures};
use crate::ln::msgs;
-use crate::ln::msgs::{DecodeError, OptionalField, DataLossProtect};
+use crate::ln::msgs::DecodeError;
use crate::ln::script::{self, ShutdownScript};
use crate::ln::channelmanager::{self, CounterpartyForwardingInfo, PendingHTLCStatus, HTLCSource, SentHTLCId, HTLCFailureMsg, PendingHTLCInfo, RAACommitmentOrder, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA, MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT};
use crate::ln::chan_utils::{CounterpartyCommitmentSecrets, TxCreationKeys, HTLCOutputInCommitment, htlc_success_tx_weight, htlc_timeout_tx_weight, make_funding_redeemscript, ChannelPublicKeys, CommitmentTransaction, HolderCommitmentTransaction, ChannelTransactionParameters, CounterpartyChannelTransactionParameters, MAX_HTLCS, get_commitment_transaction_number_obscure_factor, ClosingTransaction};
use crate::chain::chaininterface::{FeeEstimator, ConfirmationTarget, LowerBoundedFeeEstimator};
use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{ChannelMonitor, ChannelMonitorUpdate, ChannelMonitorUpdateStep, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID};
use crate::chain::transaction::{OutPoint, TransactionData};
-use crate::chain::keysinterface::{WriteableEcdsaChannelSigner, EntropySource, ChannelSigner, SignerProvider, NodeSigner, Recipient};
+use crate::sign::{WriteableEcdsaChannelSigner, EntropySource, ChannelSigner, SignerProvider, NodeSigner, Recipient};
use crate::events::ClosureReason;
use crate::routing::gossip::NodeId;
use crate::util::ser::{Readable, ReadableArgs, Writeable, Writer, VecWriter};
pub shutdown_msg: Option<msgs::Shutdown>,
}
+/// The return type of `force_shutdown`
+pub(crate) type ShutdownResult = (
+ Option<(PublicKey, OutPoint, ChannelMonitorUpdate)>,
+ Vec<(HTLCSource, PaymentHash, PublicKey, [u8; 32])>
+);
+
/// If the majority of the channels funds are to the fundee and the initiator holds only just
/// enough funds to cover their reserve value, channels are at risk of getting "stuck". Because the
/// initiator controls the feerate, if they then go to increase the channel fee, they may have no
/// * `EXPIRE_PREV_CONFIG_TICKS` = convergence_delay / tick_interval
pub(crate) const EXPIRE_PREV_CONFIG_TICKS: usize = 5;
+/// The number of ticks that may elapse while we're waiting for a response to a
+/// [`msgs::RevokeAndACK`] or [`msgs::ChannelReestablish`] message before we attempt to disconnect
+/// them.
+///
+/// See [`Channel::sent_message_awaiting_response`] for more information.
+pub(crate) const DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS: usize = 2;
+
struct PendingChannelMonitorUpdate {
update: ChannelMonitorUpdate,
/// In some cases we need to delay letting the [`ChannelMonitorUpdate`] go until after an
/// See-also <https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/4006>
pub workaround_lnd_bug_4006: Option<msgs::ChannelReady>,
+ /// An option set when we wish to track how many ticks have elapsed while waiting for a response
+ /// from our counterparty after sending a message. If the peer has yet to respond after reaching
+ /// `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`, a reconnection should be attempted to try to
+ /// unblock the state machine.
+ ///
+ /// This behavior is mostly motivated by a lnd bug in which we don't receive a message we expect
+ /// to in a timely manner, which may lead to channels becoming unusable and/or force-closed. An
+ /// example of such can be found at <https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/7682>.
+ ///
+ /// This is currently only used when waiting for a [`msgs::ChannelReestablish`] or
+ /// [`msgs::RevokeAndACK`] message from the counterparty.
+ sent_message_awaiting_response: Option<usize>,
+
#[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
// When we receive an HTLC fulfill on an outbound path, we may immediately fulfill the
// corresponding HTLC on the inbound path. If, then, the outbound path channel is
secp_ctx.seeded_randomize(&entropy_source.get_secure_random_bytes());
let shutdown_scriptpubkey = if config.channel_handshake_config.commit_upfront_shutdown_pubkey {
- Some(signer_provider.get_shutdown_scriptpubkey())
+ match signer_provider.get_shutdown_scriptpubkey() {
+ Ok(scriptpubkey) => Some(scriptpubkey),
+ Err(_) => return Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err: "Failed to get shutdown scriptpubkey".to_owned()}),
+ }
} else { None };
if let Some(shutdown_scriptpubkey) = &shutdown_scriptpubkey {
}
}
+ let destination_script = match signer_provider.get_destination_script() {
+ Ok(script) => script,
+ Err(_) => return Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err: "Failed to get destination script".to_owned()}),
+ };
+
let temporary_channel_id = entropy_source.get_secure_random_bytes();
Ok(Channel {
holder_signer,
shutdown_scriptpubkey,
- destination_script: signer_provider.get_destination_script(),
+ destination_script,
cur_holder_commitment_transaction_number: INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number: INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
next_remote_commitment_tx_fee_info_cached: Mutex::new(None),
workaround_lnd_bug_4006: None,
+ sent_message_awaiting_response: None,
latest_inbound_scid_alias: None,
outbound_scid_alias,
let counterparty_shutdown_scriptpubkey = if their_features.supports_upfront_shutdown_script() {
match &msg.shutdown_scriptpubkey {
- &OptionalField::Present(ref script) => {
+ &Some(ref script) => {
// Peer is signaling upfront_shutdown and has opt-out with a 0-length script. We don't enforce anything
if script.len() == 0 {
None
}
},
// Peer is signaling upfront shutdown but don't opt-out with correct mechanism (a.k.a 0-length script). Peer looks buggy, we fail the channel
- &OptionalField::Absent => {
+ &None => {
return Err(ChannelError::Close("Peer is signaling upfront_shutdown but we don't get any script. Use 0-length script to opt-out".to_owned()));
}
}
} else { None };
let shutdown_scriptpubkey = if config.channel_handshake_config.commit_upfront_shutdown_pubkey {
- Some(signer_provider.get_shutdown_scriptpubkey())
+ match signer_provider.get_shutdown_scriptpubkey() {
+ Ok(scriptpubkey) => Some(scriptpubkey),
+ Err(_) => return Err(ChannelError::Close("Failed to get upfront shutdown scriptpubkey".to_owned())),
+ }
} else { None };
if let Some(shutdown_scriptpubkey) = &shutdown_scriptpubkey {
}
}
+ let destination_script = match signer_provider.get_destination_script() {
+ Ok(script) => script,
+ Err(_) => return Err(ChannelError::Close("Failed to get destination script".to_owned())),
+ };
+
let mut secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
secp_ctx.seeded_randomize(&entropy_source.get_secure_random_bytes());
holder_signer,
shutdown_scriptpubkey,
- destination_script: signer_provider.get_destination_script(),
+ destination_script,
cur_holder_commitment_transaction_number: INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number: INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
next_remote_commitment_tx_fee_info_cached: Mutex::new(None),
workaround_lnd_bug_4006: None,
+ sent_message_awaiting_response: None,
latest_inbound_scid_alias: None,
outbound_scid_alias,
let counterparty_shutdown_scriptpubkey = if their_features.supports_upfront_shutdown_script() {
match &msg.shutdown_scriptpubkey {
- &OptionalField::Present(ref script) => {
+ &Some(ref script) => {
// Peer is signaling upfront_shutdown and has opt-out with a 0-length script. We don't enforce anything
if script.len() == 0 {
None
}
},
// Peer is signaling upfront shutdown but don't opt-out with correct mechanism (a.k.a 0-length script). Peer looks buggy, we fail the channel
- &OptionalField::Absent => {
+ &None => {
return Err(ChannelError::Close("Peer is signaling upfront_shutdown but we don't get any script. Use 0-length script to opt-out".to_owned()));
}
}
// OK, we step the channel here and *then* if the new generation fails we can fail the
// channel based on that, but stepping stuff here should be safe either way.
self.channel_state &= !(ChannelState::AwaitingRemoteRevoke as u32);
+ self.sent_message_awaiting_response = None;
self.counterparty_prev_commitment_point = self.counterparty_cur_commitment_point;
self.counterparty_cur_commitment_point = Some(msg.next_per_commitment_point);
self.cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number -= 1;
}
}
+ self.sent_message_awaiting_response = None;
+
self.channel_state |= ChannelState::PeerDisconnected as u32;
log_trace!(logger, "Peer disconnection resulted in {} remote-announced HTLC drops on channel {}", inbound_drop_count, log_bytes!(self.channel_id()));
}
Some(self.get_last_revoke_and_ack())
} else { None };
let commitment_update = if self.monitor_pending_commitment_signed {
+ self.mark_awaiting_response();
Some(self.get_last_commitment_update(logger))
} else { None };
if msg.next_local_commitment_number >= INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER || msg.next_remote_commitment_number >= INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER ||
msg.next_local_commitment_number == 0 {
- return Err(ChannelError::Close("Peer sent a garbage channel_reestablish".to_owned()));
+ return Err(ChannelError::Close("Peer sent a garbage channel_reestablish (usually an lnd node with lost state asking us to force-close for them)".to_owned()));
}
if msg.next_remote_commitment_number > 0 {
- match msg.data_loss_protect {
- OptionalField::Present(ref data_loss) => {
- let expected_point = self.holder_signer.get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - msg.next_remote_commitment_number + 1, &self.secp_ctx);
- let given_secret = SecretKey::from_slice(&data_loss.your_last_per_commitment_secret)
- .map_err(|_| ChannelError::Close("Peer sent a garbage channel_reestablish with unparseable secret key".to_owned()))?;
- if expected_point != PublicKey::from_secret_key(&self.secp_ctx, &given_secret) {
- return Err(ChannelError::Close("Peer sent a garbage channel_reestablish with secret key not matching the commitment height provided".to_owned()));
+ let expected_point = self.holder_signer.get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - msg.next_remote_commitment_number + 1, &self.secp_ctx);
+ let given_secret = SecretKey::from_slice(&msg.your_last_per_commitment_secret)
+ .map_err(|_| ChannelError::Close("Peer sent a garbage channel_reestablish with unparseable secret key".to_owned()))?;
+ if expected_point != PublicKey::from_secret_key(&self.secp_ctx, &given_secret) {
+ return Err(ChannelError::Close("Peer sent a garbage channel_reestablish with secret key not matching the commitment height provided".to_owned()));
+ }
+ if msg.next_remote_commitment_number > INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - self.cur_holder_commitment_transaction_number {
+ macro_rules! log_and_panic {
+ ($err_msg: expr) => {
+ log_error!(logger, $err_msg, log_bytes!(self.channel_id), log_pubkey!(self.counterparty_node_id));
+ panic!($err_msg, log_bytes!(self.channel_id), log_pubkey!(self.counterparty_node_id));
}
- if msg.next_remote_commitment_number > INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - self.cur_holder_commitment_transaction_number {
- macro_rules! log_and_panic {
- ($err_msg: expr) => {
- log_error!(logger, $err_msg, log_bytes!(self.channel_id), log_pubkey!(self.counterparty_node_id));
- panic!($err_msg, log_bytes!(self.channel_id), log_pubkey!(self.counterparty_node_id));
- }
- }
- log_and_panic!("We have fallen behind - we have received proof that if we broadcast our counterparty is going to claim all our funds.\n\
- This implies you have restarted with lost ChannelMonitor and ChannelManager state, the first of which is a violation of the LDK chain::Watch requirements.\n\
- More specifically, this means you have a bug in your implementation that can cause loss of funds, or you are running with an old backup, which is unsafe.\n\
- If you have restored from an old backup and wish to force-close channels and return to operation, you should start up, call\n\
- ChannelManager::force_close_without_broadcasting_txn on channel {} with counterparty {} or\n\
- ChannelManager::force_close_all_channels_without_broadcasting_txn, then reconnect to peer(s).\n\
- Note that due to a long-standing bug in lnd you may have to reach out to peers running lnd-based nodes to ask them to manually force-close channels\n\
- See https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/issues/1565 for more info.");
- }
- },
- OptionalField::Absent => {}
+ }
+ log_and_panic!("We have fallen behind - we have received proof that if we broadcast our counterparty is going to claim all our funds.\n\
+ This implies you have restarted with lost ChannelMonitor and ChannelManager state, the first of which is a violation of the LDK chain::Watch requirements.\n\
+ More specifically, this means you have a bug in your implementation that can cause loss of funds, or you are running with an old backup, which is unsafe.\n\
+ If you have restored from an old backup and wish to force-close channels and return to operation, you should start up, call\n\
+ ChannelManager::force_close_without_broadcasting_txn on channel {} with counterparty {} or\n\
+ ChannelManager::force_close_all_channels_without_broadcasting_txn, then reconnect to peer(s).\n\
+ Note that due to a long-standing bug in lnd you may have to reach out to peers running lnd-based nodes to ask them to manually force-close channels\n\
+ See https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/issues/1565 for more info.");
}
}
// Go ahead and unmark PeerDisconnected as various calls we may make check for it (and all
// remaining cases either succeed or ErrorMessage-fail).
self.channel_state &= !(ChannelState::PeerDisconnected as u32);
+ self.sent_message_awaiting_response = None;
let shutdown_msg = if self.channel_state & (ChannelState::LocalShutdownSent as u32) != 0 {
assert!(self.shutdown_scriptpubkey.is_some());
// revoke_and_ack, not on sending commitment_signed, so we add one if have
// AwaitingRemoteRevoke set, which indicates we sent a commitment_signed but haven't gotten
// the corresponding revoke_and_ack back yet.
- let next_counterparty_commitment_number = INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - self.cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number + if (self.channel_state & ChannelState::AwaitingRemoteRevoke as u32) != 0 { 1 } else { 0 };
+ let is_awaiting_remote_revoke = self.channel_state & ChannelState::AwaitingRemoteRevoke as u32 != 0;
+ if is_awaiting_remote_revoke && !self.is_awaiting_monitor_update() {
+ self.mark_awaiting_response();
+ }
+ let next_counterparty_commitment_number = INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - self.cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number + if is_awaiting_remote_revoke { 1 } else { 0 };
let channel_ready = if msg.next_local_commitment_number == 1 && INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - self.cur_holder_commitment_transaction_number == 1 {
// We should never have to worry about MonitorUpdateInProgress resending ChannelReady
}), None))
}
+ // Marks a channel as waiting for a response from the counterparty. If it's not received
+ // [`DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`] after sending our own to them, then we'll attempt
+ // a reconnection.
+ fn mark_awaiting_response(&mut self) {
+ self.sent_message_awaiting_response = Some(0);
+ }
+
+ /// Determines whether we should disconnect the counterparty due to not receiving a response
+ /// within our expected timeframe.
+ ///
+ /// This should be called on every [`super::channelmanager::ChannelManager::timer_tick_occurred`].
+ pub fn should_disconnect_peer_awaiting_response(&mut self) -> bool {
+ let ticks_elapsed = if let Some(ticks_elapsed) = self.sent_message_awaiting_response.as_mut() {
+ ticks_elapsed
+ } else {
+ // Don't disconnect when we're not waiting on a response.
+ return false;
+ };
+ *ticks_elapsed += 1;
+ *ticks_elapsed >= DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS
+ }
+
pub fn shutdown<SP: Deref>(
&mut self, signer_provider: &SP, their_features: &InitFeatures, msg: &msgs::Shutdown
) -> Result<(Option<msgs::Shutdown>, Option<&ChannelMonitorUpdate>, Vec<(HTLCSource, PaymentHash)>), ChannelError>
Some(_) => false,
None => {
assert!(send_shutdown);
- let shutdown_scriptpubkey = signer_provider.get_shutdown_scriptpubkey();
+ let shutdown_scriptpubkey = match signer_provider.get_shutdown_scriptpubkey() {
+ Ok(scriptpubkey) => scriptpubkey,
+ Err(_) => return Err(ChannelError::Close("Failed to get shutdown scriptpubkey".to_owned())),
+ };
if !shutdown_scriptpubkey.is_compatible(their_features) {
return Err(ChannelError::Close(format!("Provided a scriptpubkey format not accepted by peer: {}", shutdown_scriptpubkey)));
}
self.pending_monitor_updates.is_empty()
}
+ pub fn complete_all_mon_updates_through(&mut self, update_id: u64) {
+ self.pending_monitor_updates.retain(|upd| {
+ if upd.update.update_id <= update_id {
+ assert!(!upd.blocked, "Completed update must have flown");
+ false
+ } else { true }
+ });
+ }
+
pub fn complete_one_mon_update(&mut self, update_id: u64) {
self.pending_monitor_updates.retain(|upd| upd.update.update_id != update_id);
}
+ /// Returns an iterator over all unblocked monitor updates which have not yet completed.
+ pub fn uncompleted_unblocked_mon_updates(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item=&ChannelMonitorUpdate> {
+ self.pending_monitor_updates.iter()
+ .filter_map(|upd| if upd.blocked { None } else { Some(&upd.update) })
+ }
+
/// Returns true if funding_created was sent/received.
pub fn is_funding_initiated(&self) -> bool {
self.channel_state >= ChannelState::FundingSent as u32
htlc_basepoint: keys.htlc_basepoint,
first_per_commitment_point,
channel_flags: if self.config.announced_channel {1} else {0},
- shutdown_scriptpubkey: OptionalField::Present(match &self.shutdown_scriptpubkey {
+ shutdown_scriptpubkey: Some(match &self.shutdown_scriptpubkey {
Some(script) => script.clone().into_inner(),
None => Builder::new().into_script(),
}),
delayed_payment_basepoint: keys.delayed_payment_basepoint,
htlc_basepoint: keys.htlc_basepoint,
first_per_commitment_point,
- shutdown_scriptpubkey: OptionalField::Present(match &self.shutdown_scriptpubkey {
+ shutdown_scriptpubkey: Some(match &self.shutdown_scriptpubkey {
Some(script) => script.clone().into_inner(),
None => Builder::new().into_script(),
}),
/// May panic if called on a channel that wasn't immediately-previously
/// self.remove_uncommitted_htlcs_and_mark_paused()'d
- pub fn get_channel_reestablish<L: Deref>(&self, logger: &L) -> msgs::ChannelReestablish where L::Target: Logger {
+ pub fn get_channel_reestablish<L: Deref>(&mut self, logger: &L) -> msgs::ChannelReestablish where L::Target: Logger {
assert_eq!(self.channel_state & ChannelState::PeerDisconnected as u32, ChannelState::PeerDisconnected as u32);
assert_ne!(self.cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number, INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER);
// Prior to static_remotekey, my_current_per_commitment_point was critical to claiming
// valid, and valid in fuzzing mode's arbitrary validity criteria:
let mut pk = [2; 33]; pk[1] = 0xff;
let dummy_pubkey = PublicKey::from_slice(&pk).unwrap();
- let data_loss_protect = if self.cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number + 1 < INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER {
+ let remote_last_secret = if self.cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number + 1 < INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER {
let remote_last_secret = self.commitment_secrets.get_secret(self.cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number + 2).unwrap();
log_trace!(logger, "Enough info to generate a Data Loss Protect with per_commitment_secret {} for channel {}", log_bytes!(remote_last_secret), log_bytes!(self.channel_id()));
- OptionalField::Present(DataLossProtect {
- your_last_per_commitment_secret: remote_last_secret,
- my_current_per_commitment_point: dummy_pubkey
- })
+ remote_last_secret
} else {
log_info!(logger, "Sending a data_loss_protect with no previous remote per_commitment_secret for channel {}", log_bytes!(self.channel_id()));
- OptionalField::Present(DataLossProtect {
- your_last_per_commitment_secret: [0;32],
- my_current_per_commitment_point: dummy_pubkey,
- })
+ [0;32]
};
+ self.mark_awaiting_response();
msgs::ChannelReestablish {
channel_id: self.channel_id(),
// The protocol has two different commitment number concepts - the "commitment
// dropped this channel on disconnect as it hasn't yet reached FundingSent so we can't
// overflow here.
next_remote_commitment_number: INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - self.cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number - 1,
- data_loss_protect,
+ your_last_per_commitment_secret: remote_last_secret,
+ my_current_per_commitment_point: dummy_pubkey,
+ // TODO(dual_funding): If we've sent `commtiment_signed` for an interactive transaction
+ // construction but have not received `tx_signatures` we MUST set `next_funding_txid` to the
+ // txid of that interactive transaction, else we MUST NOT set it.
+ next_funding_txid: None,
}
}
/// May jump to the channel being fully shutdown (see [`Self::is_shutdown`]) in which case no
/// [`ChannelMonitorUpdate`] will be returned).
pub fn get_shutdown<SP: Deref>(&mut self, signer_provider: &SP, their_features: &InitFeatures,
- target_feerate_sats_per_kw: Option<u32>)
+ target_feerate_sats_per_kw: Option<u32>, override_shutdown_script: Option<ShutdownScript>)
-> Result<(msgs::Shutdown, Option<&ChannelMonitorUpdate>, Vec<(HTLCSource, PaymentHash)>), APIError>
where SP::Target: SignerProvider {
for htlc in self.pending_outbound_htlcs.iter() {
return Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err: "Shutdown already in progress by remote".to_owned()});
}
}
+ if self.shutdown_scriptpubkey.is_some() && override_shutdown_script.is_some() {
+ return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError{err: "Cannot override shutdown script for a channel with one already set".to_owned()});
+ }
assert_eq!(self.channel_state & ChannelState::ShutdownComplete as u32, 0);
if self.channel_state & (ChannelState::PeerDisconnected as u32 | ChannelState::MonitorUpdateInProgress as u32) != 0 {
return Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err: "Cannot begin shutdown while peer is disconnected or we're waiting on a monitor update, maybe force-close instead?".to_owned()});
let update_shutdown_script = match self.shutdown_scriptpubkey {
Some(_) => false,
None if !chan_closed => {
- let shutdown_scriptpubkey = signer_provider.get_shutdown_scriptpubkey();
+ // use override shutdown script if provided
+ let shutdown_scriptpubkey = match override_shutdown_script {
+ Some(script) => script,
+ None => {
+ // otherwise, use the shutdown scriptpubkey provided by the signer
+ match signer_provider.get_shutdown_scriptpubkey() {
+ Ok(scriptpubkey) => scriptpubkey,
+ Err(_) => return Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err: "Failed to get shutdown scriptpubkey".to_owned()}),
+ }
+ },
+ };
if !shutdown_scriptpubkey.is_compatible(their_features) {
return Err(APIError::IncompatibleShutdownScript { script: shutdown_scriptpubkey.clone() });
}
/// those explicitly stated to be allowed after shutdown completes, eg some simple getters).
/// Also returns the list of payment_hashes for channels which we can safely fail backwards
/// immediately (others we will have to allow to time out).
- pub fn force_shutdown(&mut self, should_broadcast: bool) -> (Option<(OutPoint, ChannelMonitorUpdate)>, Vec<(HTLCSource, PaymentHash, PublicKey, [u8; 32])>) {
+ pub fn force_shutdown(&mut self, should_broadcast: bool) -> ShutdownResult {
// Note that we MUST only generate a monitor update that indicates force-closure - we're
// called during initialization prior to the chain_monitor in the encompassing ChannelManager
// being fully configured in some cases. Thus, its likely any monitor events we generate will
// See test_duplicate_chan_id and test_pre_lockin_no_chan_closed_update for more.
if self.channel_state & (ChannelState::FundingSent as u32 | ChannelState::ChannelReady as u32 | ChannelState::ShutdownComplete as u32) != 0 {
self.latest_monitor_update_id = CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID;
- Some((funding_txo, ChannelMonitorUpdate {
+ Some((self.get_counterparty_node_id(), funding_txo, ChannelMonitorUpdate {
update_id: self.latest_monitor_update_id,
updates: vec![ChannelMonitorUpdateStep::ChannelForceClosed { should_broadcast }],
}))
next_remote_commitment_tx_fee_info_cached: Mutex::new(None),
workaround_lnd_bug_4006: None,
+ sent_message_awaiting_response: None,
latest_inbound_scid_alias,
// Later in the ChannelManager deserialization phase we scan for channels and assign scid aliases if its missing
use crate::ln::channel::{Channel, InboundHTLCOutput, OutboundHTLCOutput, InboundHTLCState, OutboundHTLCState, HTLCCandidate, HTLCInitiator};
use crate::ln::channel::{MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO, TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS, MIN_THEIR_CHAN_RESERVE_SATOSHIS};
use crate::ln::features::ChannelTypeFeatures;
- use crate::ln::msgs::{ChannelUpdate, DataLossProtect, DecodeError, OptionalField, UnsignedChannelUpdate, MAX_VALUE_MSAT};
+ use crate::ln::msgs::{ChannelUpdate, DecodeError, UnsignedChannelUpdate, MAX_VALUE_MSAT};
use crate::ln::script::ShutdownScript;
use crate::ln::chan_utils;
use crate::ln::chan_utils::{htlc_success_tx_weight, htlc_timeout_tx_weight};
use crate::chain::BestBlock;
use crate::chain::chaininterface::{FeeEstimator, LowerBoundedFeeEstimator, ConfirmationTarget};
- use crate::chain::keysinterface::{ChannelSigner, InMemorySigner, EntropySource, SignerProvider};
+ use crate::sign::{ChannelSigner, InMemorySigner, EntropySource, SignerProvider};
use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
use crate::routing::router::Path;
use crate::util::config::UserConfig;
fn read_chan_signer(&self, _data: &[u8]) -> Result<Self::Signer, DecodeError> { panic!(); }
- fn get_destination_script(&self) -> Script {
+ fn get_destination_script(&self) -> Result<Script, ()> {
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::signing_only();
let channel_monitor_claim_key = SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("0fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff").unwrap()[..]).unwrap();
let channel_monitor_claim_key_hash = WPubkeyHash::hash(&PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &channel_monitor_claim_key).serialize());
- Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_PUSHBYTES_0).push_slice(&channel_monitor_claim_key_hash[..]).into_script()
+ Ok(Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_PUSHBYTES_0).push_slice(&channel_monitor_claim_key_hash[..]).into_script())
}
- fn get_shutdown_scriptpubkey(&self) -> ShutdownScript {
+ fn get_shutdown_scriptpubkey(&self) -> Result<ShutdownScript, ()> {
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::signing_only();
let channel_close_key = SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("0fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff").unwrap()[..]).unwrap();
- ShutdownScript::new_p2wpkh_from_pubkey(PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &channel_close_key))
+ Ok(ShutdownScript::new_p2wpkh_from_pubkey(PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &channel_close_key)))
}
}
let msg = node_b_chan.get_channel_reestablish(&&logger);
assert_eq!(msg.next_local_commitment_number, 1); // now called next_commitment_number
assert_eq!(msg.next_remote_commitment_number, 0); // now called next_revocation_number
- match msg.data_loss_protect {
- OptionalField::Present(DataLossProtect { your_last_per_commitment_secret, .. }) => {
- assert_eq!(your_last_per_commitment_secret, [0; 32]);
- },
- _ => panic!()
- }
+ assert_eq!(msg.your_last_per_commitment_secret, [0; 32]);
// Check that the commitment point in Node A's channel_reestablish message
// is sane.
let msg = node_a_chan.get_channel_reestablish(&&logger);
assert_eq!(msg.next_local_commitment_number, 1); // now called next_commitment_number
assert_eq!(msg.next_remote_commitment_number, 0); // now called next_revocation_number
- match msg.data_loss_protect {
- OptionalField::Present(DataLossProtect { your_last_per_commitment_secret, .. }) => {
- assert_eq!(your_last_per_commitment_secret, [0; 32]);
- },
- _ => panic!()
- }
+ assert_eq!(msg.your_last_per_commitment_secret, [0; 32]);
}
#[test]
use bitcoin::hashes::hex::FromHex;
use bitcoin::hash_types::Txid;
use bitcoin::secp256k1::Message;
- use crate::chain::keysinterface::EcdsaChannelSigner;
+ use crate::sign::EcdsaChannelSigner;
use crate::ln::PaymentPreimage;
use crate::ln::channel::{HTLCOutputInCommitment ,TxCreationKeys};
use crate::ln::chan_utils::{ChannelPublicKeys, HolderCommitmentTransaction, CounterpartyChannelTransactionParameters};
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff