use crate::ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, ChannelTypeFeatures, InitFeatures, NodeFeatures};
#[cfg(any(feature = "_test_utils", test))]
use crate::ln::features::InvoiceFeatures;
-use crate::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, RoutePath, RouteParameters};
+use crate::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, RoutePath};
use crate::ln::msgs;
use crate::ln::onion_utils;
use crate::ln::onion_utils::HTLCFailReason;
use crate::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, DecodeError, LightningError, MAX_VALUE_MSAT};
+#[cfg(test)]
+use crate::ln::outbound_payment;
+use crate::ln::outbound_payment::{OutboundPayments, PendingOutboundPayment};
use crate::ln::wire::Encode;
use crate::chain::keysinterface::{Sign, KeysInterface, KeysManager, Recipient};
use crate::util::config::{UserConfig, ChannelConfig};
use core::time::Duration;
use core::ops::Deref;
+// Re-export this for use in the public API.
+pub use crate::ln::outbound_payment::PaymentSendFailure;
+
// We hold various information about HTLC relay in the HTLC objects in Channel itself:
//
// Upon receipt of an HTLC from a peer, we'll give it a PendingHTLCStatus indicating if it should
msg: &'static str,
}
-/// Return value for claim_funds_from_hop
-enum ClaimFundsFromHop {
- PrevHopForceClosed,
- MonitorUpdateFail(PublicKey, MsgHandleErrInternal, Option<u64>),
- Success(u64),
- DuplicateClaim,
-}
-
type ShutdownResult = (Option<(OutPoint, ChannelMonitorUpdate)>, Vec<(HTLCSource, PaymentHash, PublicKey, [u8; 32])>);
/// Error type returned across the channel_state mutex boundary. When an Err is generated for a
RevokeAndACKFirst,
}
+/// Information about a payment which is currently being claimed.
+struct ClaimingPayment {
+ amount_msat: u64,
+ payment_purpose: events::PaymentPurpose,
+ receiver_node_id: PublicKey,
+}
+impl_writeable_tlv_based!(ClaimingPayment, {
+ (0, amount_msat, required),
+ (2, payment_purpose, required),
+ (4, receiver_node_id, required),
+});
+
+/// Information about claimable or being-claimed payments
+struct ClaimablePayments {
+ /// Map from payment hash to the payment data and any HTLCs which are to us and can be
+ /// failed/claimed by the user.
+ ///
+ /// Note that, no consistency guarantees are made about the channels given here actually
+ /// existing anymore by the time you go to read them!
+ ///
+ /// When adding to the map, [`Self::pending_claiming_payments`] must also be checked to ensure
+ /// we don't get a duplicate payment.
+ claimable_htlcs: HashMap<PaymentHash, (events::PaymentPurpose, Vec<ClaimableHTLC>)>,
+
+ /// Map from payment hash to the payment data for HTLCs which we have begun claiming, but which
+ /// are waiting on a [`ChannelMonitorUpdate`] to complete in order to be surfaced to the user
+ /// as an [`events::Event::PaymentClaimed`].
+ pending_claiming_payments: HashMap<PaymentHash, ClaimingPayment>,
+}
+
// Note this is only exposed in cfg(test):
pub(super) struct ChannelHolder<Signer: Sign> {
pub(super) by_id: HashMap<[u8; 32], Channel<Signer>>,
ClosingMonitorUpdate((OutPoint, ChannelMonitorUpdate)),
}
+pub(crate) enum MonitorUpdateCompletionAction {
+ /// Indicates that a payment ultimately destined for us was claimed and we should emit an
+ /// [`events::Event::PaymentClaimed`] to the user if we haven't yet generated such an event for
+ /// this payment. Note that this is only best-effort. On restart it's possible such a duplicate
+ /// event can be generated.
+ PaymentClaimed { payment_hash: PaymentHash },
+ /// Indicates an [`events::Event`] should be surfaced to the user.
+ EmitEvent { event: events::Event },
+}
+
/// State we hold per-peer. In the future we should put channels in here, but for now we only hold
/// the latest Init features we heard from the peer.
struct PeerState {
min_value_msat: Option<u64>,
}
-/// Stores the session_priv for each part of a payment that is still pending. For versions 0.0.102
-/// and later, also stores information for retrying the payment.
-pub(crate) enum PendingOutboundPayment {
- Legacy {
- session_privs: HashSet<[u8; 32]>,
- },
- Retryable {
- session_privs: HashSet<[u8; 32]>,
- payment_hash: PaymentHash,
- payment_secret: Option<PaymentSecret>,
- pending_amt_msat: u64,
- /// Used to track the fee paid. Only present if the payment was serialized on 0.0.103+.
- pending_fee_msat: Option<u64>,
- /// The total payment amount across all paths, used to verify that a retry is not overpaying.
- total_msat: u64,
- /// Our best known block height at the time this payment was initiated.
- starting_block_height: u32,
- },
- /// When a pending payment is fulfilled, we continue tracking it until all pending HTLCs have
- /// been resolved. This ensures we don't look up pending payments in ChannelMonitors on restart
- /// and add a pending payment that was already fulfilled.
- Fulfilled {
- session_privs: HashSet<[u8; 32]>,
- payment_hash: Option<PaymentHash>,
- timer_ticks_without_htlcs: u8,
- },
- /// When a payer gives up trying to retry a payment, they inform us, letting us generate a
- /// `PaymentFailed` event when all HTLCs have irrevocably failed. This avoids a number of race
- /// conditions in MPP-aware payment retriers (1), where the possibility of multiple
- /// `PaymentPathFailed` events with `all_paths_failed` can be pending at once, confusing a
- /// downstream event handler as to when a payment has actually failed.
- ///
- /// (1) https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/issues/1164
- Abandoned {
- session_privs: HashSet<[u8; 32]>,
- payment_hash: PaymentHash,
- },
-}
-
-impl PendingOutboundPayment {
- fn is_fulfilled(&self) -> bool {
- match self {
- PendingOutboundPayment::Fulfilled { .. } => true,
- _ => false,
- }
- }
- fn abandoned(&self) -> bool {
- match self {
- PendingOutboundPayment::Abandoned { .. } => true,
- _ => false,
- }
- }
- fn get_pending_fee_msat(&self) -> Option<u64> {
- match self {
- PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { pending_fee_msat, .. } => pending_fee_msat.clone(),
- _ => None,
- }
- }
-
- fn payment_hash(&self) -> Option<PaymentHash> {
- match self {
- PendingOutboundPayment::Legacy { .. } => None,
- PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { payment_hash, .. } => Some(*payment_hash),
- PendingOutboundPayment::Fulfilled { payment_hash, .. } => *payment_hash,
- PendingOutboundPayment::Abandoned { payment_hash, .. } => Some(*payment_hash),
- }
- }
-
- fn mark_fulfilled(&mut self) {
- let mut session_privs = HashSet::new();
- core::mem::swap(&mut session_privs, match self {
- PendingOutboundPayment::Legacy { session_privs } |
- PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { session_privs, .. } |
- PendingOutboundPayment::Fulfilled { session_privs, .. } |
- PendingOutboundPayment::Abandoned { session_privs, .. }
- => session_privs,
- });
- let payment_hash = self.payment_hash();
- *self = PendingOutboundPayment::Fulfilled { session_privs, payment_hash, timer_ticks_without_htlcs: 0 };
- }
-
- fn mark_abandoned(&mut self) -> Result<(), ()> {
- let mut session_privs = HashSet::new();
- let our_payment_hash;
- core::mem::swap(&mut session_privs, match self {
- PendingOutboundPayment::Legacy { .. } |
- PendingOutboundPayment::Fulfilled { .. } =>
- return Err(()),
- PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { session_privs, payment_hash, .. } |
- PendingOutboundPayment::Abandoned { session_privs, payment_hash, .. } => {
- our_payment_hash = *payment_hash;
- session_privs
- },
- });
- *self = PendingOutboundPayment::Abandoned { session_privs, payment_hash: our_payment_hash };
- Ok(())
- }
-
- /// panics if path is None and !self.is_fulfilled
- fn remove(&mut self, session_priv: &[u8; 32], path: Option<&Vec<RouteHop>>) -> bool {
- let remove_res = match self {
- PendingOutboundPayment::Legacy { session_privs } |
- PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { session_privs, .. } |
- PendingOutboundPayment::Fulfilled { session_privs, .. } |
- PendingOutboundPayment::Abandoned { session_privs, .. } => {
- session_privs.remove(session_priv)
- }
- };
- if remove_res {
- if let PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { ref mut pending_amt_msat, ref mut pending_fee_msat, .. } = self {
- let path = path.expect("Fulfilling a payment should always come with a path");
- let path_last_hop = path.last().expect("Outbound payments must have had a valid path");
- *pending_amt_msat -= path_last_hop.fee_msat;
- if let Some(fee_msat) = pending_fee_msat.as_mut() {
- *fee_msat -= path.get_path_fees();
- }
- }
- }
- remove_res
- }
-
- fn insert(&mut self, session_priv: [u8; 32], path: &Vec<RouteHop>) -> bool {
- let insert_res = match self {
- PendingOutboundPayment::Legacy { session_privs } |
- PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { session_privs, .. } => {
- session_privs.insert(session_priv)
- }
- PendingOutboundPayment::Fulfilled { .. } => false,
- PendingOutboundPayment::Abandoned { .. } => false,
- };
- if insert_res {
- if let PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { ref mut pending_amt_msat, ref mut pending_fee_msat, .. } = self {
- let path_last_hop = path.last().expect("Outbound payments must have had a valid path");
- *pending_amt_msat += path_last_hop.fee_msat;
- if let Some(fee_msat) = pending_fee_msat.as_mut() {
- *fee_msat += path.get_path_fees();
- }
- }
- }
- insert_res
- }
-
- fn remaining_parts(&self) -> usize {
- match self {
- PendingOutboundPayment::Legacy { session_privs } |
- PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { session_privs, .. } |
- PendingOutboundPayment::Fulfilled { session_privs, .. } |
- PendingOutboundPayment::Abandoned { session_privs, .. } => {
- session_privs.len()
- }
- }
- }
-}
-
/// SimpleArcChannelManager is useful when you need a ChannelManager with a static lifetime, e.g.
/// when you're using lightning-net-tokio (since tokio::spawn requires parameters with static
/// lifetimes). Other times you can afford a reference, which is more efficient, in which case
// |
// |__`pending_inbound_payments`
// | |
-// | |__`claimable_htlcs`
+// | |__`claimable_payments`
// | |
-// | |__`pending_outbound_payments`
+// | |__`pending_outbound_payments` // This field's struct contains a map of pending outbounds
// | |
// | |__`channel_state`
// | |
/// See `PendingOutboundPayment` documentation for more info.
///
/// See `ChannelManager` struct-level documentation for lock order requirements.
- pending_outbound_payments: Mutex<HashMap<PaymentId, PendingOutboundPayment>>,
+ pending_outbound_payments: OutboundPayments,
/// SCID/SCID Alias -> forward infos. Key of 0 means payments received.
///
/// See `ChannelManager` struct-level documentation for lock order requirements.
pending_intercepted_htlcs: Mutex<HashMap<InterceptId, PendingAddHTLCInfo>>,
- /// Map from payment hash to the payment data and any HTLCs which are to us and can be
- /// failed/claimed by the user.
- ///
- /// Note that, no consistency guarantees are made about the channels given here actually
- /// existing anymore by the time you go to read them!
+ /// The sets of payments which are claimable or currently being claimed. See
+ /// [`ClaimablePayments`]' individual field docs for more info.
///
/// See `ChannelManager` struct-level documentation for lock order requirements.
- claimable_htlcs: Mutex<HashMap<PaymentHash, (events::PaymentPurpose, Vec<ClaimableHTLC>)>>,
+ claimable_payments: Mutex<ClaimablePayments>,
/// The set of outbound SCID aliases across all our channels, including unconfirmed channels
/// and some closed channels which reached a usable state prior to being closed. This is used
/// The number of ticks of [`ChannelManager::timer_tick_occurred`] until we time-out the
/// idempotency of payments by [`PaymentId`]. See
-/// [`ChannelManager::remove_stale_resolved_payments`].
+/// [`OutboundPayments::remove_stale_resolved_payments`].
pub(crate) const IDEMPOTENCY_TIMEOUT_TICKS: u8 = 7;
/// Information needed for constructing an invoice route hint for this channel.
}
}
-/// If a payment fails to send, it can be in one of several states. This enum is returned as the
-/// Err() type describing which state the payment is in, see the description of individual enum
-/// states for more.
-#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
-pub enum PaymentSendFailure {
- /// A parameter which was passed to send_payment was invalid, preventing us from attempting to
- /// send the payment at all.
- ///
- /// You can freely resend the payment in full (with the parameter error fixed).
- ///
- /// Because the payment failed outright, no payment tracking is done, you do not need to call
- /// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`] and [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`] will *not* work
- /// for this payment.
- ParameterError(APIError),
- /// A parameter in a single path which was passed to send_payment was invalid, preventing us
- /// from attempting to send the payment at all.
- ///
- /// You can freely resend the payment in full (with the parameter error fixed).
- ///
- /// The results here are ordered the same as the paths in the route object which was passed to
- /// send_payment.
- ///
- /// Because the payment failed outright, no payment tracking is done, you do not need to call
- /// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`] and [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`] will *not* work
- /// for this payment.
- PathParameterError(Vec<Result<(), APIError>>),
- /// All paths which were attempted failed to send, with no channel state change taking place.
- /// You can freely resend the payment in full (though you probably want to do so over different
- /// paths than the ones selected).
- ///
- /// Because the payment failed outright, no payment tracking is done, you do not need to call
- /// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`] and [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`] will *not* work
- /// for this payment.
- AllFailedResendSafe(Vec<APIError>),
- /// Indicates that a payment for the provided [`PaymentId`] is already in-flight and has not
- /// yet completed (i.e. generated an [`Event::PaymentSent`]) or been abandoned (via
- /// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]).
- ///
- /// [`Event::PaymentSent`]: events::Event::PaymentSent
- DuplicatePayment,
- /// Some paths which were attempted failed to send, though possibly not all. At least some
- /// paths have irrevocably committed to the HTLC and retrying the payment in full would result
- /// in over-/re-payment.
- ///
- /// The results here are ordered the same as the paths in the route object which was passed to
- /// send_payment, and any `Err`s which are not [`APIError::MonitorUpdateInProgress`] can be
- /// safely retried via [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`].
- ///
- /// Any entries which contain `Err(APIError::MonitorUpdateInprogress)` or `Ok(())` MUST NOT be
- /// retried as they will result in over-/re-payment. These HTLCs all either successfully sent
- /// (in the case of `Ok(())`) or will send once a [`MonitorEvent::Completed`] is provided for
- /// the next-hop channel with the latest update_id.
- PartialFailure {
- /// The errors themselves, in the same order as the route hops.
- results: Vec<Result<(), APIError>>,
- /// If some paths failed without irrevocably committing to the new HTLC(s), this will
- /// contain a [`RouteParameters`] object which can be used to calculate a new route that
- /// will pay all remaining unpaid balance.
- failed_paths_retry: Option<RouteParameters>,
- /// The payment id for the payment, which is now at least partially pending.
- payment_id: PaymentId,
- },
-}
-
/// Route hints used in constructing invoices for [phantom node payents].
///
/// [phantom node payments]: crate::chain::keysinterface::PhantomKeysManager
}),
outbound_scid_aliases: Mutex::new(HashSet::new()),
pending_inbound_payments: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()),
- pending_outbound_payments: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()),
+ pending_outbound_payments: OutboundPayments::new(),
forward_htlcs: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()),
- claimable_htlcs: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()),
+ claimable_payments: Mutex::new(ClaimablePayments { claimable_htlcs: HashMap::new(), pending_claiming_payments: HashMap::new() }),
pending_intercepted_htlcs: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()),
id_to_peer: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()),
short_to_chan_info: FairRwLock::new(HashMap::new()),
/// [`Event::PaymentSent`]: events::Event::PaymentSent
/// [`PeerManager::process_events`]: crate::ln::peer_handler::PeerManager::process_events
pub fn send_payment(&self, route: &Route, payment_hash: PaymentHash, payment_secret: &Option<PaymentSecret>, payment_id: PaymentId) -> Result<(), PaymentSendFailure> {
- let onion_session_privs = self.add_new_pending_payment(payment_hash, *payment_secret, payment_id, route)?;
- self.send_payment_internal(route, payment_hash, payment_secret, None, payment_id, None, onion_session_privs)
+ let best_block_height = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
+ self.pending_outbound_payments
+ .send_payment(route, payment_hash, payment_secret, payment_id, &self.keys_manager, best_block_height,
+ |path, payment_params, payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, keysend_preimage, session_priv|
+ self.send_payment_along_path(path, payment_params, payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, keysend_preimage, session_priv))
}
#[cfg(test)]
- pub(crate) fn test_add_new_pending_payment(&self, payment_hash: PaymentHash, payment_secret: Option<PaymentSecret>, payment_id: PaymentId, route: &Route) -> Result<Vec<[u8; 32]>, PaymentSendFailure> {
- self.add_new_pending_payment(payment_hash, payment_secret, payment_id, route)
+ fn test_send_payment_internal(&self, route: &Route, payment_hash: PaymentHash, payment_secret: &Option<PaymentSecret>, keysend_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>, payment_id: PaymentId, recv_value_msat: Option<u64>, onion_session_privs: Vec<[u8; 32]>) -> Result<(), PaymentSendFailure> {
+ let best_block_height = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
+ self.pending_outbound_payments.test_send_payment_internal(route, payment_hash, payment_secret, keysend_preimage, payment_id, recv_value_msat, onion_session_privs, &self.keys_manager, best_block_height,
+ |path, payment_params, payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, keysend_preimage, session_priv|
+ self.send_payment_along_path(path, payment_params, payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, keysend_preimage, session_priv))
}
- fn add_new_pending_payment(&self, payment_hash: PaymentHash, payment_secret: Option<PaymentSecret>, payment_id: PaymentId, route: &Route) -> Result<Vec<[u8; 32]>, PaymentSendFailure> {
- let mut onion_session_privs = Vec::with_capacity(route.paths.len());
- for _ in 0..route.paths.len() {
- onion_session_privs.push(self.keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes());
- }
-
- let mut pending_outbounds = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
- match pending_outbounds.entry(payment_id) {
- hash_map::Entry::Occupied(_) => Err(PaymentSendFailure::DuplicatePayment),
- hash_map::Entry::Vacant(entry) => {
- let payment = entry.insert(PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable {
- session_privs: HashSet::new(),
- pending_amt_msat: 0,
- pending_fee_msat: Some(0),
- payment_hash,
- payment_secret,
- starting_block_height: self.best_block.read().unwrap().height(),
- total_msat: route.get_total_amount(),
- });
-
- for (path, session_priv_bytes) in route.paths.iter().zip(onion_session_privs.iter()) {
- assert!(payment.insert(*session_priv_bytes, path));
- }
-
- Ok(onion_session_privs)
- },
- }
+ #[cfg(test)]
+ pub(crate) fn test_add_new_pending_payment(&self, payment_hash: PaymentHash, payment_secret: Option<PaymentSecret>, payment_id: PaymentId, route: &Route) -> Result<Vec<[u8; 32]>, PaymentSendFailure> {
+ let best_block_height = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
+ self.pending_outbound_payments.add_new_pending_payment(payment_hash, payment_secret, payment_id, route, &self.keys_manager, best_block_height)
}
- fn send_payment_internal(&self, route: &Route, payment_hash: PaymentHash, payment_secret: &Option<PaymentSecret>, keysend_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>, payment_id: PaymentId, recv_value_msat: Option<u64>, onion_session_privs: Vec<[u8; 32]>) -> Result<(), PaymentSendFailure> {
- if route.paths.len() < 1 {
- return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::InvalidRoute{err: "There must be at least one path to send over"}));
- }
- if payment_secret.is_none() && route.paths.len() > 1 {
- return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError{err: "Payment secret is required for multi-path payments".to_string()}));
- }
- let mut total_value = 0;
- let our_node_id = self.get_our_node_id();
- let mut path_errs = Vec::with_capacity(route.paths.len());
- 'path_check: for path in route.paths.iter() {
- if path.len() < 1 || path.len() > 20 {
- path_errs.push(Err(APIError::InvalidRoute{err: "Path didn't go anywhere/had bogus size"}));
- continue 'path_check;
- }
- for (idx, hop) in path.iter().enumerate() {
- if idx != path.len() - 1 && hop.pubkey == our_node_id {
- path_errs.push(Err(APIError::InvalidRoute{err: "Path went through us but wasn't a simple rebalance loop to us"}));
- continue 'path_check;
- }
- }
- total_value += path.last().unwrap().fee_msat;
- path_errs.push(Ok(()));
- }
- if path_errs.iter().any(|e| e.is_err()) {
- return Err(PaymentSendFailure::PathParameterError(path_errs));
- }
- if let Some(amt_msat) = recv_value_msat {
- debug_assert!(amt_msat >= total_value);
- total_value = amt_msat;
- }
-
- let cur_height = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
- let mut results = Vec::new();
- debug_assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), onion_session_privs.len());
- for (path, session_priv) in route.paths.iter().zip(onion_session_privs.into_iter()) {
- let mut path_res = self.send_payment_along_path(&path, &route.payment_params, &payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, &keysend_preimage, session_priv);
- match path_res {
- Ok(_) => {},
- Err(APIError::MonitorUpdateInProgress) => {
- // While a MonitorUpdateInProgress is an Err(_), the payment is still
- // considered "in flight" and we shouldn't remove it from the
- // PendingOutboundPayment set.
- },
- Err(_) => {
- let mut pending_outbounds = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
- if let Some(payment) = pending_outbounds.get_mut(&payment_id) {
- let removed = payment.remove(&session_priv, Some(path));
- debug_assert!(removed, "This can't happen as the payment has an entry for this path added by callers");
- } else {
- debug_assert!(false, "This can't happen as the payment was added by callers");
- path_res = Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err: "Internal error: payment disappeared during processing. Please report this bug!".to_owned() });
- }
- }
- }
- results.push(path_res);
- }
- let mut has_ok = false;
- let mut has_err = false;
- let mut pending_amt_unsent = 0;
- let mut max_unsent_cltv_delta = 0;
- for (res, path) in results.iter().zip(route.paths.iter()) {
- if res.is_ok() { has_ok = true; }
- if res.is_err() { has_err = true; }
- if let &Err(APIError::MonitorUpdateInProgress) = res {
- // MonitorUpdateInProgress is inherently unsafe to retry, so we call it a
- // PartialFailure.
- has_err = true;
- has_ok = true;
- } else if res.is_err() {
- pending_amt_unsent += path.last().unwrap().fee_msat;
- max_unsent_cltv_delta = cmp::max(max_unsent_cltv_delta, path.last().unwrap().cltv_expiry_delta);
- }
- }
- if has_err && has_ok {
- Err(PaymentSendFailure::PartialFailure {
- results,
- payment_id,
- failed_paths_retry: if pending_amt_unsent != 0 {
- if let Some(payment_params) = &route.payment_params {
- Some(RouteParameters {
- payment_params: payment_params.clone(),
- final_value_msat: pending_amt_unsent,
- final_cltv_expiry_delta: max_unsent_cltv_delta,
- })
- } else { None }
- } else { None },
- })
- } else if has_err {
- // If we failed to send any paths, we should remove the new PaymentId from the
- // `pending_outbound_payments` map, as the user isn't expected to `abandon_payment`.
- let removed = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap().remove(&payment_id).is_some();
- debug_assert!(removed, "We should always have a pending payment to remove here");
- Err(PaymentSendFailure::AllFailedResendSafe(results.drain(..).map(|r| r.unwrap_err()).collect()))
- } else {
- Ok(())
- }
- }
/// Retries a payment along the given [`Route`].
///
/// [`send_payment`]: [`ChannelManager::send_payment`]
/// [`abandon_payment`]: [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]
pub fn retry_payment(&self, route: &Route, payment_id: PaymentId) -> Result<(), PaymentSendFailure> {
- const RETRY_OVERFLOW_PERCENTAGE: u64 = 10;
- for path in route.paths.iter() {
- if path.len() == 0 {
- return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError {
- err: "length-0 path in route".to_string()
- }))
- }
- }
-
- let mut onion_session_privs = Vec::with_capacity(route.paths.len());
- for _ in 0..route.paths.len() {
- onion_session_privs.push(self.keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes());
- }
-
- let (total_msat, payment_hash, payment_secret) = {
- let mut outbounds = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
- match outbounds.get_mut(&payment_id) {
- Some(payment) => {
- let res = match payment {
- PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable {
- total_msat, payment_hash, payment_secret, pending_amt_msat, ..
- } => {
- let retry_amt_msat: u64 = route.paths.iter().map(|path| path.last().unwrap().fee_msat).sum();
- if retry_amt_msat + *pending_amt_msat > *total_msat * (100 + RETRY_OVERFLOW_PERCENTAGE) / 100 {
- return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError {
- err: format!("retry_amt_msat of {} will put pending_amt_msat (currently: {}) more than 10% over total_payment_amt_msat of {}", retry_amt_msat, pending_amt_msat, total_msat).to_string()
- }))
- }
- (*total_msat, *payment_hash, *payment_secret)
- },
- PendingOutboundPayment::Legacy { .. } => {
- return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError {
- err: "Unable to retry payments that were initially sent on LDK versions prior to 0.0.102".to_string()
- }))
- },
- PendingOutboundPayment::Fulfilled { .. } => {
- return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError {
- err: "Payment already completed".to_owned()
- }));
- },
- PendingOutboundPayment::Abandoned { .. } => {
- return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError {
- err: "Payment already abandoned (with some HTLCs still pending)".to_owned()
- }));
- },
- };
- for (path, session_priv_bytes) in route.paths.iter().zip(onion_session_privs.iter()) {
- assert!(payment.insert(*session_priv_bytes, path));
- }
- res
- },
- None =>
- return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError {
- err: format!("Payment with ID {} not found", log_bytes!(payment_id.0)),
- })),
- }
- };
- self.send_payment_internal(route, payment_hash, &payment_secret, None, payment_id, Some(total_msat), onion_session_privs)
+ let best_block_height = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
+ self.pending_outbound_payments.retry_payment(route, payment_id, &self.keys_manager, best_block_height,
+ |path, payment_params, payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, keysend_preimage, session_priv|
+ self.send_payment_along_path(path, payment_params, payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, keysend_preimage, session_priv))
}
/// Signals that no further retries for the given payment will occur.
/// [`Event::PaymentSent`]: events::Event::PaymentSent
pub fn abandon_payment(&self, payment_id: PaymentId) {
let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop(&self.total_consistency_lock, &self.persistence_notifier);
-
- let mut outbounds = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
- if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut payment) = outbounds.entry(payment_id) {
- if let Ok(()) = payment.get_mut().mark_abandoned() {
- if payment.get().remaining_parts() == 0 {
- self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push(events::Event::PaymentFailed {
- payment_id,
- payment_hash: payment.get().payment_hash().expect("PendingOutboundPayments::RetriesExceeded always has a payment hash set"),
- });
- payment.remove();
- }
- }
+ if let Some(payment_failed_ev) = self.pending_outbound_payments.abandon_payment(payment_id) {
+ self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push(payment_failed_ev);
}
}
///
/// [`send_payment`]: Self::send_payment
pub fn send_spontaneous_payment(&self, route: &Route, payment_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>, payment_id: PaymentId) -> Result<PaymentHash, PaymentSendFailure> {
- let preimage = match payment_preimage {
- Some(p) => p,
- None => PaymentPreimage(self.keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes()),
- };
- let payment_hash = PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&preimage.0).into_inner());
- let onion_session_privs = self.add_new_pending_payment(payment_hash, None, payment_id, &route)?;
-
- match self.send_payment_internal(route, payment_hash, &None, Some(preimage), payment_id, None, onion_session_privs) {
- Ok(()) => Ok(payment_hash),
- Err(e) => Err(e)
- }
+ let best_block_height = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
+ self.pending_outbound_payments.send_spontaneous_payment(route, payment_preimage, payment_id, &self.keys_manager, best_block_height,
+ |path, payment_params, payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, keysend_preimage, session_priv|
+ self.send_payment_along_path(path, payment_params, payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, keysend_preimage, session_priv))
}
/// Send a payment that is probing the given route for liquidity. We calculate the
/// [`PaymentHash`] of probes based on a static secret and a random [`PaymentId`], which allows
/// us to easily discern them from real payments.
pub fn send_probe(&self, hops: Vec<RouteHop>) -> Result<(PaymentHash, PaymentId), PaymentSendFailure> {
- let payment_id = PaymentId(self.keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes());
-
- let payment_hash = self.probing_cookie_from_id(&payment_id);
-
- if hops.len() < 2 {
- return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError {
- err: "No need probing a path with less than two hops".to_string()
- }))
- }
-
- let route = Route { paths: vec![hops], payment_params: None };
- let onion_session_privs = self.add_new_pending_payment(payment_hash, None, payment_id, &route)?;
-
- match self.send_payment_internal(&route, payment_hash, &None, None, payment_id, None, onion_session_privs) {
- Ok(()) => Ok((payment_hash, payment_id)),
- Err(e) => Err(e)
- }
+ let best_block_height = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
+ self.pending_outbound_payments.send_probe(hops, self.probing_cookie_secret, &self.keys_manager, best_block_height,
+ |path, payment_params, payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, keysend_preimage, session_priv|
+ self.send_payment_along_path(path, payment_params, payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, keysend_preimage, session_priv))
}
/// Returns whether a payment with the given [`PaymentHash`] and [`PaymentId`] is, in fact, a
/// payment probe.
+ #[cfg(test)]
pub(crate) fn payment_is_probe(&self, payment_hash: &PaymentHash, payment_id: &PaymentId) -> bool {
- let target_payment_hash = self.probing_cookie_from_id(payment_id);
- target_payment_hash == *payment_hash
- }
-
- /// Returns the 'probing cookie' for the given [`PaymentId`].
- fn probing_cookie_from_id(&self, payment_id: &PaymentId) -> PaymentHash {
- let mut preimage = [0u8; 64];
- preimage[..32].copy_from_slice(&self.probing_cookie_secret);
- preimage[32..].copy_from_slice(&payment_id.0);
- PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&preimage).into_inner())
+ outbound_payment::payment_is_probe(payment_hash, payment_id, self.probing_cookie_secret)
}
/// Handles the generation of a funding transaction, optionally (for tests) with a function
payment_secret: $payment_data.payment_secret,
}
};
- let mut claimable_htlcs = self.claimable_htlcs.lock().unwrap();
- let (_, htlcs) = claimable_htlcs.entry(payment_hash)
+ let mut claimable_payments = self.claimable_payments.lock().unwrap();
+ if claimable_payments.pending_claiming_payments.contains_key(&payment_hash) {
+ fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc, payment_hash);
+ continue
+ }
+ let (_, htlcs) = claimable_payments.claimable_htlcs.entry(payment_hash)
.or_insert_with(|| (purpose(), Vec::new()));
if htlcs.len() == 1 {
if let OnionPayload::Spontaneous(_) = htlcs[0].onion_payload {
check_total_value!(payment_data, payment_preimage);
},
OnionPayload::Spontaneous(preimage) => {
- match self.claimable_htlcs.lock().unwrap().entry(payment_hash) {
+ let mut claimable_payments = self.claimable_payments.lock().unwrap();
+ if claimable_payments.pending_claiming_payments.contains_key(&payment_hash) {
+ fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc, payment_hash);
+ continue
+ }
+ match claimable_payments.claimable_htlcs.entry(payment_hash) {
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(e) => {
let purpose = events::PaymentPurpose::SpontaneousPayment(preimage);
e.insert((purpose.clone(), vec![claimable_htlc]));
});
}
- fn remove_stale_resolved_payments(&self) {
- // If an outbound payment was completed, and no pending HTLCs remain, we should remove it
- // from the map. However, if we did that immediately when the last payment HTLC is claimed,
- // this could race the user making a duplicate send_payment call and our idempotency
- // guarantees would be violated. Instead, we wait a few timer ticks to do the actual
- // removal. This should be more than sufficient to ensure the idempotency of any
- // `send_payment` calls that were made at the same time the `PaymentSent` event was being
- // processed.
- let mut pending_outbound_payments = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
- let pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
- pending_outbound_payments.retain(|payment_id, payment| {
- if let PendingOutboundPayment::Fulfilled { session_privs, timer_ticks_without_htlcs, .. } = payment {
- let mut no_remaining_entries = session_privs.is_empty();
- if no_remaining_entries {
- for ev in pending_events.iter() {
- match ev {
- events::Event::PaymentSent { payment_id: Some(ev_payment_id), .. } |
- events::Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { payment_id: ev_payment_id, .. } |
- events::Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_id: Some(ev_payment_id), .. } => {
- if payment_id == ev_payment_id {
- no_remaining_entries = false;
- break;
- }
- },
- _ => {},
- }
- }
- }
- if no_remaining_entries {
- *timer_ticks_without_htlcs += 1;
- *timer_ticks_without_htlcs <= IDEMPOTENCY_TIMEOUT_TICKS
- } else {
- *timer_ticks_without_htlcs = 0;
- true
- }
- } else { true }
- });
- }
-
/// Performs actions which should happen on startup and roughly once per minute thereafter.
///
/// This currently includes:
});
}
- self.claimable_htlcs.lock().unwrap().retain(|payment_hash, (_, htlcs)| {
+ self.claimable_payments.lock().unwrap().claimable_htlcs.retain(|payment_hash, (_, htlcs)| {
if htlcs.is_empty() {
// This should be unreachable
debug_assert!(false);
let _ = handle_error!(self, err, counterparty_node_id);
}
- self.remove_stale_resolved_payments();
+ self.pending_outbound_payments.remove_stale_resolved_payments(&self.pending_events);
// Technically we don't need to do this here, but if we have holding cell entries in a
// channel that need freeing, it's better to do that here and block a background task
pub fn fail_htlc_backwards(&self, payment_hash: &PaymentHash) {
let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop(&self.total_consistency_lock, &self.persistence_notifier);
- let removed_source = self.claimable_htlcs.lock().unwrap().remove(payment_hash);
+ let removed_source = self.claimable_payments.lock().unwrap().claimable_htlcs.remove(payment_hash);
if let Some((_, mut sources)) = removed_source {
for htlc in sources.drain(..) {
let mut htlc_msat_height_data = htlc.value.to_be_bytes().to_vec();
// being fully configured. See the docs for `ChannelManagerReadArgs` for more.
match source {
HTLCSource::OutboundRoute { ref path, ref session_priv, ref payment_id, ref payment_params, .. } => {
- let mut session_priv_bytes = [0; 32];
- session_priv_bytes.copy_from_slice(&session_priv[..]);
- let mut outbounds = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
- let mut all_paths_failed = false;
- let mut full_failure_ev = None;
- if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut payment) = outbounds.entry(*payment_id) {
- if !payment.get_mut().remove(&session_priv_bytes, Some(&path)) {
- log_trace!(self.logger, "Received duplicative fail for HTLC with payment_hash {}", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
- return;
- }
- if payment.get().is_fulfilled() {
- log_trace!(self.logger, "Received failure of HTLC with payment_hash {} after payment completion", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
- return;
- }
- if payment.get().remaining_parts() == 0 {
- all_paths_failed = true;
- if payment.get().abandoned() {
- full_failure_ev = Some(events::Event::PaymentFailed {
- payment_id: *payment_id,
- payment_hash: payment.get().payment_hash().expect("PendingOutboundPayments::RetriesExceeded always has a payment hash set"),
- });
- payment.remove();
- }
- }
- } else {
- log_trace!(self.logger, "Received duplicative fail for HTLC with payment_hash {}", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
- return;
- }
- let mut retry = if let Some(payment_params_data) = payment_params {
- let path_last_hop = path.last().expect("Outbound payments must have had a valid path");
- Some(RouteParameters {
- payment_params: payment_params_data.clone(),
- final_value_msat: path_last_hop.fee_msat,
- final_cltv_expiry_delta: path_last_hop.cltv_expiry_delta,
- })
- } else { None };
- log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing outbound payment HTLC with payment_hash {}", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
-
- let path_failure = {
-#[cfg(test)]
- let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_error.decode_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source);
-#[cfg(not(test))]
- let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_error.decode_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source);
-
- if self.payment_is_probe(payment_hash, &payment_id) {
- if !payment_retryable {
- events::Event::ProbeSuccessful {
- payment_id: *payment_id,
- payment_hash: payment_hash.clone(),
- path: path.clone(),
- }
- } else {
- events::Event::ProbeFailed {
- payment_id: *payment_id,
- payment_hash: payment_hash.clone(),
- path: path.clone(),
- short_channel_id,
- }
- }
- } else {
- // TODO: If we decided to blame ourselves (or one of our channels) in
- // process_onion_failure we should close that channel as it implies our
- // next-hop is needlessly blaming us!
- if let Some(scid) = short_channel_id {
- retry.as_mut().map(|r| r.payment_params.previously_failed_channels.push(scid));
- }
- events::Event::PaymentPathFailed {
- payment_id: Some(*payment_id),
- payment_hash: payment_hash.clone(),
- payment_failed_permanently: !payment_retryable,
- network_update,
- all_paths_failed,
- path: path.clone(),
- short_channel_id,
- retry,
- #[cfg(test)]
- error_code: onion_error_code,
- #[cfg(test)]
- error_data: onion_error_data
- }
- }
- };
- let mut pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
- pending_events.push(path_failure);
- if let Some(ev) = full_failure_ev { pending_events.push(ev); }
+ self.pending_outbound_payments.fail_htlc(source, payment_hash, onion_error, path, session_priv, payment_id, payment_params, self.probing_cookie_secret, &self.secp_ctx, &self.pending_events, &self.logger);
},
HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData { ref short_channel_id, ref htlc_id, ref incoming_packet_shared_secret, ref phantom_shared_secret, ref outpoint }) => {
log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLC with payment_hash {} backwards from us with {:?}", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), onion_error);
/// [`process_pending_events`]: EventsProvider::process_pending_events
/// [`create_inbound_payment`]: Self::create_inbound_payment
/// [`create_inbound_payment_for_hash`]: Self::create_inbound_payment_for_hash
- /// [`get_and_clear_pending_msg_events`]: MessageSendEventsProvider::get_and_clear_pending_msg_events
pub fn claim_funds(&self, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage) {
let payment_hash = PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&payment_preimage.0).into_inner());
let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop(&self.total_consistency_lock, &self.persistence_notifier);
- let removed_source = self.claimable_htlcs.lock().unwrap().remove(&payment_hash);
- if let Some((payment_purpose, mut sources)) = removed_source {
- assert!(!sources.is_empty());
-
- // If we are claiming an MPP payment, we have to take special care to ensure that each
- // channel exists before claiming all of the payments (inside one lock).
- // Note that channel existance is sufficient as we should always get a monitor update
- // which will take care of the real HTLC claim enforcement.
- //
- // If we find an HTLC which we would need to claim but for which we do not have a
- // channel, we will fail all parts of the MPP payment. While we could wait and see if
- // the sender retries the already-failed path(s), it should be a pretty rare case where
- // we got all the HTLCs and then a channel closed while we were waiting for the user to
- // provide the preimage, so worrying too much about the optimal handling isn't worth
- // it.
- let mut claimable_amt_msat = 0;
- let mut expected_amt_msat = None;
- let mut valid_mpp = true;
- let mut errs = Vec::new();
- let mut claimed_any_htlcs = false;
- let mut channel_state_lock = self.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
- let channel_state = &mut *channel_state_lock;
- let mut receiver_node_id = Some(self.our_network_pubkey);
- for htlc in sources.iter() {
- let chan_id = match self.short_to_chan_info.read().unwrap().get(&htlc.prev_hop.short_channel_id) {
- Some((_cp_id, chan_id)) => chan_id.clone(),
- None => {
- valid_mpp = false;
+ let mut sources = {
+ let mut claimable_payments = self.claimable_payments.lock().unwrap();
+ if let Some((payment_purpose, sources)) = claimable_payments.claimable_htlcs.remove(&payment_hash) {
+ let mut receiver_node_id = self.our_network_pubkey;
+ for htlc in sources.iter() {
+ if htlc.prev_hop.phantom_shared_secret.is_some() {
+ let phantom_pubkey = self.keys_manager.get_node_id(Recipient::PhantomNode)
+ .expect("Failed to get node_id for phantom node recipient");
+ receiver_node_id = phantom_pubkey;
break;
}
- };
+ }
- if let None = channel_state.by_id.get(&chan_id) {
- valid_mpp = false;
- break;
+ let dup_purpose = claimable_payments.pending_claiming_payments.insert(payment_hash,
+ ClaimingPayment { amount_msat: sources.iter().map(|source| source.value).sum(),
+ payment_purpose, receiver_node_id,
+ });
+ if dup_purpose.is_some() {
+ debug_assert!(false, "Shouldn't get a duplicate pending claim event ever");
+ log_error!(self.logger, "Got a duplicate pending claimable event on payment hash {}! Please report this bug",
+ log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
}
+ sources
+ } else { return; }
+ };
+ debug_assert!(!sources.is_empty());
- if expected_amt_msat.is_some() && expected_amt_msat != Some(htlc.total_msat) {
- log_error!(self.logger, "Somehow ended up with an MPP payment with different total amounts - this should not be reachable!");
- debug_assert!(false);
+ // If we are claiming an MPP payment, we check that all channels which contain a claimable
+ // HTLC still exist. While this isn't guaranteed to remain true if a channel closes while
+ // we're claiming (or even after we claim, before the commitment update dance completes),
+ // it should be a relatively rare race, and we'd rather not claim HTLCs that require us to
+ // go on-chain (and lose the on-chain fee to do so) than just reject the payment.
+ //
+ // Note that we'll still always get our funds - as long as the generated
+ // `ChannelMonitorUpdate` makes it out to the relevant monitor we can claim on-chain.
+ //
+ // If we find an HTLC which we would need to claim but for which we do not have a
+ // channel, we will fail all parts of the MPP payment. While we could wait and see if
+ // the sender retries the already-failed path(s), it should be a pretty rare case where
+ // we got all the HTLCs and then a channel closed while we were waiting for the user to
+ // provide the preimage, so worrying too much about the optimal handling isn't worth
+ // it.
+ let mut claimable_amt_msat = 0;
+ let mut expected_amt_msat = None;
+ let mut valid_mpp = true;
+ let mut errs = Vec::new();
+ let mut channel_state = Some(self.channel_state.lock().unwrap());
+ for htlc in sources.iter() {
+ let chan_id = match self.short_to_chan_info.read().unwrap().get(&htlc.prev_hop.short_channel_id) {
+ Some((_cp_id, chan_id)) => chan_id.clone(),
+ None => {
valid_mpp = false;
break;
}
- expected_amt_msat = Some(htlc.total_msat);
- if let OnionPayload::Spontaneous(_) = &htlc.onion_payload {
- // We don't currently support MPP for spontaneous payments, so just check
- // that there's one payment here and move on.
- if sources.len() != 1 {
- log_error!(self.logger, "Somehow ended up with an MPP spontaneous payment - this should not be reachable!");
- debug_assert!(false);
- valid_mpp = false;
- break;
- }
- }
- let phantom_shared_secret = htlc.prev_hop.phantom_shared_secret;
- if phantom_shared_secret.is_some() {
- let phantom_pubkey = self.keys_manager.get_node_id(Recipient::PhantomNode)
- .expect("Failed to get node_id for phantom node recipient");
- receiver_node_id = Some(phantom_pubkey)
- }
+ };
- claimable_amt_msat += htlc.value;
- }
- if sources.is_empty() || expected_amt_msat.is_none() {
- log_info!(self.logger, "Attempted to claim an incomplete payment which no longer had any available HTLCs!");
- return;
+ if let None = channel_state.as_ref().unwrap().by_id.get(&chan_id) {
+ valid_mpp = false;
+ break;
}
- if claimable_amt_msat != expected_amt_msat.unwrap() {
- log_info!(self.logger, "Attempted to claim an incomplete payment, expected {} msat, had {} available to claim.",
- expected_amt_msat.unwrap(), claimable_amt_msat);
- return;
+
+ if expected_amt_msat.is_some() && expected_amt_msat != Some(htlc.total_msat) {
+ log_error!(self.logger, "Somehow ended up with an MPP payment with different total amounts - this should not be reachable!");
+ debug_assert!(false);
+ valid_mpp = false;
+ break;
}
- if valid_mpp {
- for htlc in sources.drain(..) {
- match self.claim_funds_from_hop(&mut channel_state_lock, htlc.prev_hop, payment_preimage) {
- ClaimFundsFromHop::MonitorUpdateFail(pk, err, _) => {
- if let msgs::ErrorAction::IgnoreError = err.err.action {
- // We got a temporary failure updating monitor, but will claim the
- // HTLC when the monitor updating is restored (or on chain).
- log_error!(self.logger, "Temporary failure claiming HTLC, treating as success: {}", err.err.err);
- claimed_any_htlcs = true;
- } else { errs.push((pk, err)); }
- },
- ClaimFundsFromHop::PrevHopForceClosed => unreachable!("We already checked for channel existence, we can't fail here!"),
- ClaimFundsFromHop::DuplicateClaim => {
- // While we should never get here in most cases, if we do, it likely
- // indicates that the HTLC was timed out some time ago and is no longer
- // available to be claimed. Thus, it does not make sense to set
- // `claimed_any_htlcs`.
- },
- ClaimFundsFromHop::Success(_) => claimed_any_htlcs = true,
- }
+ expected_amt_msat = Some(htlc.total_msat);
+ if let OnionPayload::Spontaneous(_) = &htlc.onion_payload {
+ // We don't currently support MPP for spontaneous payments, so just check
+ // that there's one payment here and move on.
+ if sources.len() != 1 {
+ log_error!(self.logger, "Somehow ended up with an MPP spontaneous payment - this should not be reachable!");
+ debug_assert!(false);
+ valid_mpp = false;
+ break;
}
}
- mem::drop(channel_state_lock);
- if !valid_mpp {
- for htlc in sources.drain(..) {
- let mut htlc_msat_height_data = htlc.value.to_be_bytes().to_vec();
- htlc_msat_height_data.extend_from_slice(&self.best_block.read().unwrap().height().to_be_bytes());
- let source = HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(htlc.prev_hop);
- let reason = HTLCFailReason::reason(0x4000 | 15, htlc_msat_height_data);
- let receiver = HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash };
- self.fail_htlc_backwards_internal(&source, &payment_hash, &reason, receiver);
+
+ claimable_amt_msat += htlc.value;
+ }
+ if sources.is_empty() || expected_amt_msat.is_none() {
+ mem::drop(channel_state);
+ self.claimable_payments.lock().unwrap().pending_claiming_payments.remove(&payment_hash);
+ log_info!(self.logger, "Attempted to claim an incomplete payment which no longer had any available HTLCs!");
+ return;
+ }
+ if claimable_amt_msat != expected_amt_msat.unwrap() {
+ mem::drop(channel_state);
+ self.claimable_payments.lock().unwrap().pending_claiming_payments.remove(&payment_hash);
+ log_info!(self.logger, "Attempted to claim an incomplete payment, expected {} msat, had {} available to claim.",
+ expected_amt_msat.unwrap(), claimable_amt_msat);
+ return;
+ }
+ if valid_mpp {
+ for htlc in sources.drain(..) {
+ if channel_state.is_none() { channel_state = Some(self.channel_state.lock().unwrap()); }
+ if let Err((pk, err)) = self.claim_funds_from_hop(channel_state.take().unwrap(), htlc.prev_hop,
+ payment_preimage,
+ |_| Some(MonitorUpdateCompletionAction::PaymentClaimed { payment_hash }))
+ {
+ if let msgs::ErrorAction::IgnoreError = err.err.action {
+ // We got a temporary failure updating monitor, but will claim the
+ // HTLC when the monitor updating is restored (or on chain).
+ log_error!(self.logger, "Temporary failure claiming HTLC, treating as success: {}", err.err.err);
+ } else { errs.push((pk, err)); }
}
}
-
- if claimed_any_htlcs {
- self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push(events::Event::PaymentClaimed {
- receiver_node_id,
- payment_hash,
- purpose: payment_purpose,
- amount_msat: claimable_amt_msat,
- });
+ }
+ mem::drop(channel_state);
+ if !valid_mpp {
+ for htlc in sources.drain(..) {
+ let mut htlc_msat_height_data = htlc.value.to_be_bytes().to_vec();
+ htlc_msat_height_data.extend_from_slice(&self.best_block.read().unwrap().height().to_be_bytes());
+ let source = HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(htlc.prev_hop);
+ let reason = HTLCFailReason::reason(0x4000 | 15, htlc_msat_height_data);
+ let receiver = HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash };
+ self.fail_htlc_backwards_internal(&source, &payment_hash, &reason, receiver);
}
+ self.claimable_payments.lock().unwrap().pending_claiming_payments.remove(&payment_hash);
+ }
- // Now we can handle any errors which were generated.
- for (counterparty_node_id, err) in errs.drain(..) {
- let res: Result<(), _> = Err(err);
- let _ = handle_error!(self, res, counterparty_node_id);
- }
+ // Now we can handle any errors which were generated.
+ for (counterparty_node_id, err) in errs.drain(..) {
+ let res: Result<(), _> = Err(err);
+ let _ = handle_error!(self, res, counterparty_node_id);
}
}
- fn claim_funds_from_hop(&self, channel_state_lock: &mut MutexGuard<ChannelHolder<<K::Target as KeysInterface>::Signer>>, prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage) -> ClaimFundsFromHop {
+ fn claim_funds_from_hop<ComplFunc: FnOnce(Option<u64>) -> Option<MonitorUpdateCompletionAction>>(&self,
+ mut channel_state_lock: MutexGuard<ChannelHolder<<K::Target as KeysInterface>::Signer>>,
+ prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage, completion_action: ComplFunc)
+ -> Result<(), (PublicKey, MsgHandleErrInternal)> {
//TODO: Delay the claimed_funds relaying just like we do outbound relay!
let chan_id = prev_hop.outpoint.to_channel_id();
- let channel_state = &mut **channel_state_lock;
+ let channel_state = &mut *channel_state_lock;
if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut chan) = channel_state.by_id.entry(chan_id) {
+ let counterparty_node_id = chan.get().get_counterparty_node_id();
match chan.get_mut().get_update_fulfill_htlc_and_commit(prev_hop.htlc_id, payment_preimage, &self.logger) {
Ok(msgs_monitor_option) => {
if let UpdateFulfillCommitFetch::NewClaim { msgs, htlc_value_msat, monitor_update } = msgs_monitor_option {
log_given_level!(self.logger, if e == ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure { Level::Error } else { Level::Debug },
"Failed to update channel monitor with preimage {:?}: {:?}",
payment_preimage, e);
- return ClaimFundsFromHop::MonitorUpdateFail(
- chan.get().get_counterparty_node_id(),
- handle_monitor_update_res!(self, e, chan, RAACommitmentOrder::CommitmentFirst, false, msgs.is_some()).unwrap_err(),
- Some(htlc_value_msat)
- );
+ let err = handle_monitor_update_res!(self, e, chan, RAACommitmentOrder::CommitmentFirst, false, msgs.is_some()).unwrap_err();
+ mem::drop(channel_state_lock);
+ self.handle_monitor_update_completion_actions(completion_action(Some(htlc_value_msat)));
+ return Err((counterparty_node_id, err));
}
}
if let Some((msg, commitment_signed)) = msgs {
}
});
}
- return ClaimFundsFromHop::Success(htlc_value_msat);
+ mem::drop(channel_state_lock);
+ self.handle_monitor_update_completion_actions(completion_action(Some(htlc_value_msat)));
+ Ok(())
} else {
- return ClaimFundsFromHop::DuplicateClaim;
+ Ok(())
}
},
Err((e, monitor_update)) => {
match self.chain_monitor.update_channel(chan.get().get_funding_txo().unwrap(), monitor_update) {
ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed => {},
e => {
+ // TODO: This needs to be handled somehow - if we receive a monitor update
+ // with a preimage we *must* somehow manage to propagate it to the upstream
+ // channel, or we must have an ability to receive the same update and try
+ // again on restart.
log_given_level!(self.logger, if e == ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure { Level::Error } else { Level::Info },
"Failed to update channel monitor with preimage {:?} immediately prior to force-close: {:?}",
payment_preimage, e);
},
}
- let counterparty_node_id = chan.get().get_counterparty_node_id();
let (drop, res) = convert_chan_err!(self, e, chan.get_mut(), &chan_id);
if drop {
chan.remove_entry();
}
- return ClaimFundsFromHop::MonitorUpdateFail(counterparty_node_id, res, None);
+ mem::drop(channel_state_lock);
+ self.handle_monitor_update_completion_actions(completion_action(None));
+ Err((counterparty_node_id, res))
},
}
- } else { return ClaimFundsFromHop::PrevHopForceClosed }
- }
-
- fn finalize_claims(&self, mut sources: Vec<HTLCSource>) {
- let mut outbounds = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
- let mut pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
- for source in sources.drain(..) {
- if let HTLCSource::OutboundRoute { session_priv, payment_id, path, .. } = source {
- let mut session_priv_bytes = [0; 32];
- session_priv_bytes.copy_from_slice(&session_priv[..]);
- if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut payment) = outbounds.entry(payment_id) {
- assert!(payment.get().is_fulfilled());
- if payment.get_mut().remove(&session_priv_bytes, None) {
- pending_events.push(
- events::Event::PaymentPathSuccessful {
- payment_id,
- payment_hash: payment.get().payment_hash(),
- path,
- }
- );
- }
- }
+ } else {
+ let preimage_update = ChannelMonitorUpdate {
+ update_id: CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID,
+ updates: vec![ChannelMonitorUpdateStep::PaymentPreimage {
+ payment_preimage,
+ }],
+ };
+ // We update the ChannelMonitor on the backward link, after
+ // receiving an `update_fulfill_htlc` from the forward link.
+ let update_res = self.chain_monitor.update_channel(prev_hop.outpoint, preimage_update);
+ if update_res != ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed {
+ // TODO: This needs to be handled somehow - if we receive a monitor update
+ // with a preimage we *must* somehow manage to propagate it to the upstream
+ // channel, or we must have an ability to receive the same event and try
+ // again on restart.
+ log_error!(self.logger, "Critical error: failed to update channel monitor with preimage {:?}: {:?}",
+ payment_preimage, update_res);
}
+ mem::drop(channel_state_lock);
+ // Note that we do process the completion action here. This totally could be a
+ // duplicate claim, but we have no way of knowing without interrogating the
+ // `ChannelMonitor` we've provided the above update to. Instead, note that `Event`s are
+ // generally always allowed to be duplicative (and it's specifically noted in
+ // `PaymentForwarded`).
+ self.handle_monitor_update_completion_actions(completion_action(None));
+ Ok(())
}
}
- fn claim_funds_internal(&self, mut channel_state_lock: MutexGuard<ChannelHolder<<K::Target as KeysInterface>::Signer>>, source: HTLCSource, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage, forwarded_htlc_value_msat: Option<u64>, from_onchain: bool, next_channel_id: [u8; 32]) {
+ fn finalize_claims(&self, sources: Vec<HTLCSource>) {
+ self.pending_outbound_payments.finalize_claims(sources, &self.pending_events);
+ }
+
+ fn claim_funds_internal(&self, channel_state_lock: MutexGuard<ChannelHolder<<K::Target as KeysInterface>::Signer>>, source: HTLCSource, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage, forwarded_htlc_value_msat: Option<u64>, from_onchain: bool, next_channel_id: [u8; 32]) {
match source {
HTLCSource::OutboundRoute { session_priv, payment_id, path, .. } => {
mem::drop(channel_state_lock);
- let mut session_priv_bytes = [0; 32];
- session_priv_bytes.copy_from_slice(&session_priv[..]);
- let mut outbounds = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
- if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut payment) = outbounds.entry(payment_id) {
- let mut pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
- if !payment.get().is_fulfilled() {
- let payment_hash = PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&payment_preimage.0).into_inner());
- let fee_paid_msat = payment.get().get_pending_fee_msat();
- pending_events.push(
- events::Event::PaymentSent {
- payment_id: Some(payment_id),
- payment_preimage,
- payment_hash,
- fee_paid_msat,
- }
- );
- payment.get_mut().mark_fulfilled();
- }
-
- if from_onchain {
- // We currently immediately remove HTLCs which were fulfilled on-chain.
- // This could potentially lead to removing a pending payment too early,
- // with a reorg of one block causing us to re-add the fulfilled payment on
- // restart.
- // TODO: We should have a second monitor event that informs us of payments
- // irrevocably fulfilled.
- if payment.get_mut().remove(&session_priv_bytes, Some(&path)) {
- let payment_hash = Some(PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&payment_preimage.0).into_inner()));
- pending_events.push(
- events::Event::PaymentPathSuccessful {
- payment_id,
- payment_hash,
- path,
- }
- );
- }
- }
- } else {
- log_trace!(self.logger, "Received duplicative fulfill for HTLC with payment_preimage {}", log_bytes!(payment_preimage.0));
- }
+ self.pending_outbound_payments.claim_htlc(payment_id, payment_preimage, session_priv, path, from_onchain, &self.pending_events, &self.logger);
},
HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(hop_data) => {
let prev_outpoint = hop_data.outpoint;
- let res = self.claim_funds_from_hop(&mut channel_state_lock, hop_data, payment_preimage);
- let claimed_htlc = if let ClaimFundsFromHop::DuplicateClaim = res { false } else { true };
- let htlc_claim_value_msat = match res {
- ClaimFundsFromHop::MonitorUpdateFail(_, _, amt_opt) => amt_opt,
- ClaimFundsFromHop::Success(amt) => Some(amt),
- _ => None,
- };
- if let ClaimFundsFromHop::PrevHopForceClosed = res {
- let preimage_update = ChannelMonitorUpdate {
- update_id: CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID,
- updates: vec![ChannelMonitorUpdateStep::PaymentPreimage {
- payment_preimage: payment_preimage.clone(),
- }],
- };
- // We update the ChannelMonitor on the backward link, after
- // receiving an offchain preimage event from the forward link (the
- // event being update_fulfill_htlc).
- let update_res = self.chain_monitor.update_channel(prev_outpoint, preimage_update);
- if update_res != ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed {
- // TODO: This needs to be handled somehow - if we receive a monitor update
- // with a preimage we *must* somehow manage to propagate it to the upstream
- // channel, or we must have an ability to receive the same event and try
- // again on restart.
- log_error!(self.logger, "Critical error: failed to update channel monitor with preimage {:?}: {:?}",
- payment_preimage, update_res);
- }
- // Note that we do *not* set `claimed_htlc` to false here. In fact, this
- // totally could be a duplicate claim, but we have no way of knowing
- // without interrogating the `ChannelMonitor` we've provided the above
- // update to. Instead, we simply document in `PaymentForwarded` that this
- // can happen.
- }
- mem::drop(channel_state_lock);
- if let ClaimFundsFromHop::MonitorUpdateFail(pk, err, _) = res {
+ let res = self.claim_funds_from_hop(channel_state_lock, hop_data, payment_preimage,
+ |htlc_claim_value_msat| {
+ if let Some(forwarded_htlc_value) = forwarded_htlc_value_msat {
+ let fee_earned_msat = if let Some(claimed_htlc_value) = htlc_claim_value_msat {
+ Some(claimed_htlc_value - forwarded_htlc_value)
+ } else { None };
+
+ let prev_channel_id = Some(prev_outpoint.to_channel_id());
+ let next_channel_id = Some(next_channel_id);
+
+ Some(MonitorUpdateCompletionAction::EmitEvent { event: events::Event::PaymentForwarded {
+ fee_earned_msat,
+ claim_from_onchain_tx: from_onchain,
+ prev_channel_id,
+ next_channel_id,
+ }})
+ } else { None }
+ });
+ if let Err((pk, err)) = res {
let result: Result<(), _> = Err(err);
let _ = handle_error!(self, result, pk);
}
-
- if claimed_htlc {
- if let Some(forwarded_htlc_value) = forwarded_htlc_value_msat {
- let fee_earned_msat = if let Some(claimed_htlc_value) = htlc_claim_value_msat {
- Some(claimed_htlc_value - forwarded_htlc_value)
- } else { None };
-
- let mut pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
- let prev_channel_id = Some(prev_outpoint.to_channel_id());
- let next_channel_id = Some(next_channel_id);
-
- pending_events.push(events::Event::PaymentForwarded {
- fee_earned_msat,
- claim_from_onchain_tx: from_onchain,
- prev_channel_id,
- next_channel_id,
- });
- }
- }
},
}
}
self.our_network_pubkey.clone()
}
+ fn handle_monitor_update_completion_actions<I: IntoIterator<Item=MonitorUpdateCompletionAction>>(&self, actions: I) {
+ for action in actions.into_iter() {
+ match action {
+ MonitorUpdateCompletionAction::PaymentClaimed { payment_hash } => {
+ let payment = self.claimable_payments.lock().unwrap().pending_claiming_payments.remove(&payment_hash);
+ if let Some(ClaimingPayment { amount_msat, payment_purpose: purpose, receiver_node_id }) = payment {
+ self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push(events::Event::PaymentClaimed {
+ payment_hash, purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id: Some(receiver_node_id),
+ });
+ }
+ },
+ MonitorUpdateCompletionAction::EmitEvent { event } => {
+ self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push(event);
+ },
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
/// Handles a channel reentering a functional state, either due to reconnect or a monitor
/// update completion.
fn handle_channel_resumption(&self, pending_msg_events: &mut Vec<MessageSendEvent>,
#[cfg(test)]
pub fn has_pending_payments(&self) -> bool {
- !self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap().is_empty()
+ self.pending_outbound_payments.has_pending_payments()
}
#[cfg(test)]
pub fn clear_pending_payments(&self) {
- self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap().clear()
+ self.pending_outbound_payments.clear_pending_payments()
}
/// Processes any events asynchronously in the order they were generated since the last call
}
if let Some(height) = height_opt {
- self.claimable_htlcs.lock().unwrap().retain(|payment_hash, (_, htlcs)| {
+ self.claimable_payments.lock().unwrap().claimable_htlcs.retain(|payment_hash, (_, htlcs)| {
htlcs.retain(|htlc| {
// If height is approaching the number of blocks we think it takes us to get
// our commitment transaction confirmed before the HTLC expires, plus the
(8, min_value_msat, required),
});
-impl_writeable_tlv_based_enum_upgradable!(PendingOutboundPayment,
- (0, Legacy) => {
- (0, session_privs, required),
- },
- (1, Fulfilled) => {
- (0, session_privs, required),
- (1, payment_hash, option),
- (3, timer_ticks_without_htlcs, (default_value, 0)),
- },
- (2, Retryable) => {
- (0, session_privs, required),
- (1, pending_fee_msat, option),
- (2, payment_hash, required),
- (4, payment_secret, option),
- (6, total_msat, required),
- (8, pending_amt_msat, required),
- (10, starting_block_height, required),
- },
- (3, Abandoned) => {
- (0, session_privs, required),
- (2, payment_hash, required),
- },
-);
-
impl<M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> Writeable for ChannelManager<M, T, K, F, L>
where M::Target: chain::Watch<<K::Target as KeysInterface>::Signer>,
T::Target: BroadcasterInterface,
}
let pending_inbound_payments = self.pending_inbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
- let claimable_htlcs = self.claimable_htlcs.lock().unwrap();
- let pending_outbound_payments = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
+ let claimable_payments = self.claimable_payments.lock().unwrap();
+ let pending_outbound_payments = self.pending_outbound_payments.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
let mut htlc_purposes: Vec<&events::PaymentPurpose> = Vec::new();
- (claimable_htlcs.len() as u64).write(writer)?;
- for (payment_hash, (purpose, previous_hops)) in claimable_htlcs.iter() {
+ (claimable_payments.claimable_htlcs.len() as u64).write(writer)?;
+ for (payment_hash, (purpose, previous_hops)) in claimable_payments.claimable_htlcs.iter() {
payment_hash.write(writer)?;
(previous_hops.len() as u64).write(writer)?;
for htlc in previous_hops.iter() {
if our_pending_intercepts.len() != 0 {
pending_intercepted_htlcs = Some(our_pending_intercepts);
}
+
+ let mut pending_claiming_payments = Some(&claimable_payments.pending_claiming_payments);
+ if pending_claiming_payments.as_ref().unwrap().is_empty() {
+ // LDK versions prior to 0.0.113 do not know how to read the pending claimed payments
+ // map. Thus, if there are no entries we skip writing a TLV for it.
+ pending_claiming_payments = None;
+ } else {
+ debug_assert!(false, "While we have code to serialize pending_claiming_payments, the map should always be empty until a later PR");
+ }
+
write_tlv_fields!(writer, {
(1, pending_outbound_payments_no_retry, required),
(2, pending_intercepted_htlcs, option),
(3, pending_outbound_payments, required),
+ (4, pending_claiming_payments, option),
(5, self.our_network_pubkey, required),
(7, self.fake_scid_rand_bytes, required),
(9, htlc_purposes, vec_type),
let mut fake_scid_rand_bytes: Option<[u8; 32]> = None;
let mut probing_cookie_secret: Option<[u8; 32]> = None;
let mut claimable_htlc_purposes = None;
+ let mut pending_claiming_payments = Some(HashMap::new());
read_tlv_fields!(reader, {
(1, pending_outbound_payments_no_retry, option),
(2, pending_intercepted_htlcs, option),
(3, pending_outbound_payments, option),
+ (4, pending_claiming_payments, option),
(5, received_network_pubkey, option),
(7, fake_scid_rand_bytes, option),
(9, claimable_htlc_purposes, vec_type),
}
for (htlc_source, htlc) in monitor.get_all_current_outbound_htlcs() {
if let HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(prev_hop_data) = htlc_source {
+ let pending_forward_matches_htlc = |info: &PendingAddHTLCInfo| {
+ info.prev_funding_outpoint == prev_hop_data.outpoint &&
+ info.prev_htlc_id == prev_hop_data.htlc_id
+ };
// The ChannelMonitor is now responsible for this HTLC's
// failure/success and will let us know what its outcome is. If we
- // still have an entry for this HTLC in `forward_htlcs`, we were
- // apparently not persisted after the monitor was when forwarding
- // the payment.
+ // still have an entry for this HTLC in `forward_htlcs` or
+ // `pending_intercepted_htlcs`, we were apparently not persisted after
+ // the monitor was when forwarding the payment.
forward_htlcs.retain(|_, forwards| {
forwards.retain(|forward| {
if let HTLCForwardInfo::AddHTLC(htlc_info) = forward {
- if htlc_info.prev_short_channel_id == prev_hop_data.short_channel_id &&
- htlc_info.prev_htlc_id == prev_hop_data.htlc_id
- {
+ if pending_forward_matches_htlc(&htlc_info) {
log_info!(args.logger, "Removing pending to-forward HTLC with hash {} as it was forwarded to the closed channel {}",
log_bytes!(htlc.payment_hash.0), log_bytes!(monitor.get_funding_txo().0.to_channel_id()));
false
} else { true }
});
!forwards.is_empty()
- })
+ });
+ pending_intercepted_htlcs.as_mut().unwrap().retain(|intercepted_id, htlc_info| {
+ if pending_forward_matches_htlc(&htlc_info) {
+ log_info!(args.logger, "Removing pending intercepted HTLC with hash {} as it was forwarded to the closed channel {}",
+ log_bytes!(htlc.payment_hash.0), log_bytes!(monitor.get_funding_txo().0.to_channel_id()));
+ pending_events_read.retain(|event| {
+ if let Event::HTLCIntercepted { intercept_id: ev_id, .. } = event {
+ intercepted_id != ev_id
+ } else { true }
+ });
+ false
+ } else { true }
+ });
}
}
}
}),
inbound_payment_key: expanded_inbound_key,
pending_inbound_payments: Mutex::new(pending_inbound_payments),
- pending_outbound_payments: Mutex::new(pending_outbound_payments.unwrap()),
+ pending_outbound_payments: OutboundPayments { pending_outbound_payments: Mutex::new(pending_outbound_payments.unwrap()) },
pending_intercepted_htlcs: Mutex::new(pending_intercepted_htlcs.unwrap()),
forward_htlcs: Mutex::new(forward_htlcs),
- claimable_htlcs: Mutex::new(claimable_htlcs),
+ claimable_payments: Mutex::new(ClaimablePayments { claimable_htlcs, pending_claiming_payments: pending_claiming_payments.unwrap() }),
outbound_scid_aliases: Mutex::new(outbound_scid_aliases),
id_to_peer: Mutex::new(id_to_peer),
short_to_chan_info: FairRwLock::new(short_to_chan_info),
// Use the utility function send_payment_along_path to send the payment with MPP data which
// indicates there are more HTLCs coming.
let cur_height = CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1; // route_payment calls send_payment, which adds 1 to the current height. So we do the same here to match.
- let session_privs = nodes[0].node.add_new_pending_payment(our_payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), payment_id, &mpp_route).unwrap();
+ let session_privs = nodes[0].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(our_payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), payment_id, &mpp_route).unwrap();
nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&mpp_route.paths[0], &route.payment_params, &our_payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), 200_000, cur_height, payment_id, &None, session_privs[0]).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
let test_preimage = PaymentPreimage([42; 32]);
let mismatch_payment_hash = PaymentHash([43; 32]);
- let session_privs = nodes[0].node.add_new_pending_payment(mismatch_payment_hash, None, PaymentId(mismatch_payment_hash.0), &route).unwrap();
- nodes[0].node.send_payment_internal(&route, mismatch_payment_hash, &None, Some(test_preimage), PaymentId(mismatch_payment_hash.0), None, session_privs).unwrap();
+ let session_privs = nodes[0].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(mismatch_payment_hash, None, PaymentId(mismatch_payment_hash.0), &route).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_internal(&route, mismatch_payment_hash, &None, Some(test_preimage), PaymentId(mismatch_payment_hash.0), None, session_privs).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
let test_preimage = PaymentPreimage([42; 32]);
let test_secret = PaymentSecret([43; 32]);
let payment_hash = PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&test_preimage.0).into_inner());
- let session_privs = nodes[0].node.add_new_pending_payment(payment_hash, Some(test_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0), &route).unwrap();
- nodes[0].node.send_payment_internal(&route, payment_hash, &Some(test_secret), Some(test_preimage), PaymentId(payment_hash.0), None, session_privs).unwrap();
+ let session_privs = nodes[0].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(payment_hash, Some(test_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0), &route).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_internal(&route, payment_hash, &Some(test_secret), Some(test_preimage), PaymentId(payment_hash.0), None, session_privs).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff