Merge pull request #2079 from tnull/2023-03-add-list-channel-by-counterparty

[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / ln / channelmanager.rs

diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
index 50cdd2a46b318c08db3393a8d42980b4222e1cfe..6e0cd1709809d5d15c03f3cc036904c1003c956c 100644 (file)
--- a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@@ -8543,7 +8543,7 @@ mod tests {
                // A MAX_UNFUNDED_CHANS_PER_PEER + 1 channel will be summarily rejected
                open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id = nodes[0].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
                nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
-               assert_eq!(get_err_msg!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).channel_id,
+               assert_eq!(get_err_msg(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).channel_id,
                        open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id);
 
                // Further, because all of our channels with nodes[0] are inbound, and none of them funded,
@@ -8590,7 +8590,7 @@ mod tests {
                        open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id = nodes[0].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
                }
                nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&last_random_pk, &open_channel_msg);
-               assert_eq!(get_err_msg!(nodes[1], last_random_pk).channel_id,
+               assert_eq!(get_err_msg(&nodes[1], &last_random_pk).channel_id,
                        open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id);
 
                // Of course, however, outbound channels are always allowed
@@ -8632,7 +8632,7 @@ mod tests {
                // Once we have MAX_UNFUNDED_CHANS_PER_PEER unfunded channels, new inbound channels will be
                // rejected.
                nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
-               assert_eq!(get_err_msg!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).channel_id,
+               assert_eq!(get_err_msg(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).channel_id,
                        open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id);
 
                // but we can still open an outbound channel.
@@ -8641,7 +8641,7 @@ mod tests {
 
                // but even with such an outbound channel, additional inbound channels will still fail.
                nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
-               assert_eq!(get_err_msg!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).channel_id,
+               assert_eq!(get_err_msg(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).channel_id,
                        open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id);
        }
 
@@ -8697,7 +8697,7 @@ mod tests {
                        }
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
                }
-               assert_eq!(get_err_msg!(nodes[1], last_random_pk).channel_id,
+               assert_eq!(get_err_msg(&nodes[1], &last_random_pk).channel_id,
                        open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id);
 
                // ...however if we accept the same channel 0conf it should work just fine.
@@ -8739,7 +8739,7 @@ mod tests {
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
                }
 
-               let error_msg = get_err_msg!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+               let error_msg = get_err_msg(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
                nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &error_msg);
 
                let open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
@@ -8905,7 +8905,7 @@ pub mod bench {
                                let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event($node_a.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().pop().unwrap());
                                $node_b.handle_update_add_htlc(&$node_a.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
                                $node_b.handle_commitment_signed(&$node_a.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg);
-                               let (raa, cs) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_b }, $node_a.get_our_node_id());
+                               let (raa, cs) = do_get_revoke_commit_msgs!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_b }, &$node_a.get_our_node_id());
                                $node_a.handle_revoke_and_ack(&$node_b.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
                                $node_a.handle_commitment_signed(&$node_b.get_our_node_id(), &cs);
                                $node_b.handle_revoke_and_ack(&$node_a.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_a }, MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, $node_b.get_our_node_id()));
@@ -8924,7 +8924,7 @@ pub mod bench {
                                        _ => panic!("Failed to generate claim event"),
                                }
 
-                               let (raa, cs) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_a }, $node_b.get_our_node_id());
+                               let (raa, cs) = do_get_revoke_commit_msgs!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_a }, &$node_b.get_our_node_id());
                                $node_b.handle_revoke_and_ack(&$node_a.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
                                $node_b.handle_commitment_signed(&$node_a.get_our_node_id(), &cs);
                                $node_a.handle_revoke_and_ack(&$node_b.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_b }, MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, $node_a.get_our_node_id()));