// it does not exist for this peer. Either way, we can attempt to force-close it.
//
// An appropriate error will be returned for non-existence of the channel if that's the case.
+ mem::drop(peer_state_lock);
+ mem::drop(per_peer_state);
return self.force_close_channel_with_peer(&channel_id, counterparty_node_id, None, false).map(|_| ())
},
}
// payment logic has enough time to fail the HTLC backward before our onchain logic triggers a
// channel closure (see HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER rationale).
let current_height: u32 = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
- if (outgoing_cltv_value as u64) <= current_height as u64 + HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER as u64 + 1 {
+ if cltv_expiry <= current_height + HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER + 1 {
let mut err_data = Vec::with_capacity(12);
err_data.extend_from_slice(&amt_msat.to_be_bytes());
err_data.extend_from_slice(¤t_height.to_be_bytes());
for channel_id in channel_ids {
if !peer_state.has_channel(channel_id) {
return Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable {
- err: format!("Channel with ID {} was not found for the passed counterparty_node_id {}", channel_id, counterparty_node_id),
+ err: format!("Channel with id {} not found for the passed counterparty node_id {}", channel_id, counterparty_node_id),
});
};
}
next_hop_channel_id, next_node_id)
}),
None => return Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable {
- err: format!("Channel with id {} not found for the passed counterparty node_id {}.",
+ err: format!("Channel with id {} not found for the passed counterparty node_id {}",
next_hop_channel_id, next_node_id)
})
}
check_api_error_message(expected_message, res_err)
}
+ fn check_channel_unavailable_error<T>(res_err: Result<T, APIError>, expected_channel_id: ChannelId, peer_node_id: PublicKey) {
+ let expected_message = format!("Channel with id {} not found for the passed counterparty node_id {}", expected_channel_id, peer_node_id);
+ check_api_error_message(expected_message, res_err)
+ }
+
+ fn check_api_misuse_error<T>(res_err: Result<T, APIError>) {
+ let expected_message = "No such channel awaiting to be accepted.".to_string();
+ check_api_error_message(expected_message, res_err)
+ }
+
fn check_api_error_message<T>(expected_err_message: String, res_err: Result<T, APIError>) {
match res_err {
Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => {
check_unkown_peer_error(nodes[0].node.update_channel_config(&unkown_public_key, &[channel_id], &ChannelConfig::default()), unkown_public_key);
}
+ #[test]
+ fn test_api_calls_with_unavailable_channel() {
+ // Tests that our API functions that expects a `counterparty_node_id` and a `channel_id`
+ // as input, behaves as expected if the `counterparty_node_id` is a known peer in the
+ // `ChannelManager::per_peer_state` map, but the peer state doesn't contain a channel with
+ // the given `channel_id`.
+ let chanmon_cfg = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfg = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfg);
+ let node_chanmgr = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfg, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfg, &node_chanmgr);
+
+ let counterparty_node_id = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
+
+ // Dummy values
+ let channel_id = ChannelId::from_bytes([4; 32]);
+
+ // Test the API functions.
+ check_api_misuse_error(nodes[0].node.accept_inbound_channel(&channel_id, &counterparty_node_id, 42));
+
+ check_channel_unavailable_error(nodes[0].node.close_channel(&channel_id, &counterparty_node_id), channel_id, counterparty_node_id);
+
+ check_channel_unavailable_error(nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&channel_id, &counterparty_node_id), channel_id, counterparty_node_id);
+
+ check_channel_unavailable_error(nodes[0].node.force_close_without_broadcasting_txn(&channel_id, &counterparty_node_id), channel_id, counterparty_node_id);
+
+ check_channel_unavailable_error(nodes[0].node.forward_intercepted_htlc(InterceptId([0; 32]), &channel_id, counterparty_node_id, 1_000_000), channel_id, counterparty_node_id);
+
+ check_channel_unavailable_error(nodes[0].node.update_channel_config(&counterparty_node_id, &[channel_id], &ChannelConfig::default()), channel_id, counterparty_node_id);
+ }
+
#[test]
fn test_connection_limiting() {
// Test that we limit un-channel'd peers and un-funded channels properly.
sender_intended_amt_msat - extra_fee_msat, 42, None, true, Some(extra_fee_msat)).is_ok());
}
+ #[test]
+ fn test_final_incorrect_cltv(){
+ let chanmon_cfg = create_chanmon_cfgs(1);
+ let node_cfg = create_node_cfgs(1, &chanmon_cfg);
+ let node_chanmgr = create_node_chanmgrs(1, &node_cfg, &[None]);
+ let node = create_network(1, &node_cfg, &node_chanmgr);
+
+ let result = node[0].node.construct_recv_pending_htlc_info(msgs::InboundOnionPayload::Receive {
+ amt_msat: 100,
+ outgoing_cltv_value: 22,
+ payment_metadata: None,
+ keysend_preimage: None,
+ payment_data: Some(msgs::FinalOnionHopData {
+ payment_secret: PaymentSecret([0; 32]), total_msat: 100,
+ }),
+ custom_tlvs: Vec::new(),
+ }, [0; 32], PaymentHash([0; 32]), 100, 23, None, true, None);
+
+ // Should not return an error as this condition:
+ // https://github.com/lightning/bolts/blob/4dcc377209509b13cf89a4b91fde7d478f5b46d8/04-onion-routing.md?plain=1#L334
+ // is not satisfied.
+ assert!(result.is_ok());
+ }
+
#[test]
fn test_inbound_anchors_manual_acceptance() {
// Tests that we properly limit inbound channels when we have the manual-channel-acceptance
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff