use chain::transaction::{OutPoint, TransactionData};
// Since this struct is returned in `list_channels` methods, expose it here in case users want to
// construct one themselves.
+use ln::{PaymentHash, PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret};
pub use ln::channel::CounterpartyForwardingInfo;
use ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError};
use ln::features::{InitFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use std::time::Duration;
#[cfg(any(test, feature = "allow_wallclock_use"))]
use std::time::Instant;
-use std::marker::{Sync, Send};
use std::ops::Deref;
use bitcoin::hashes::hex::ToHex;
short_channel_id: u64, // This should be NonZero<u64> eventually when we bump MSRV
},
Receive {
- payment_data: Option<msgs::FinalOnionHopData>,
+ payment_data: msgs::FinalOnionHopData,
incoming_cltv_expiry: u32, // Used to track when we should expire pending HTLCs that go unclaimed
},
}
struct ClaimableHTLC {
prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData,
value: u64,
- /// Filled in when the HTLC was received with a payment_secret packet, which contains a
- /// total_msat (which may differ from value if this is a Multi-Path Payment) and a
+ /// Contains a total_msat (which may differ from value if this is a Multi-Path Payment) and a
/// payment_secret which prevents path-probing attacks and can associate different HTLCs which
/// are part of the same payment.
- payment_data: Option<msgs::FinalOnionHopData>,
+ payment_data: msgs::FinalOnionHopData,
cltv_expiry: u32,
}
}
}
-/// payment_hash type, use to cross-lock hop
-/// (C-not exported) as we just use [u8; 32] directly
-#[derive(Hash, Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
-pub struct PaymentHash(pub [u8;32]);
-/// payment_preimage type, use to route payment between hop
-/// (C-not exported) as we just use [u8; 32] directly
-#[derive(Hash, Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
-pub struct PaymentPreimage(pub [u8;32]);
-/// payment_secret type, use to authenticate sender to the receiver and tie MPP HTLCs together
-/// (C-not exported) as we just use [u8; 32] directly
-#[derive(Hash, Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
-pub struct PaymentSecret(pub [u8;32]);
-
type ShutdownResult = (Option<(OutPoint, ChannelMonitorUpdate)>, Vec<(HTLCSource, PaymentHash)>);
/// Error type returned across the channel_state mutex boundary. When an Err is generated for a
/// guarantees are made about the existence of a channel with the short id here, nor the short
/// ids in the PendingHTLCInfo!
pub(super) forward_htlcs: HashMap<u64, Vec<HTLCForwardInfo>>,
- /// (payment_hash, payment_secret) -> Vec<HTLCs> for tracking HTLCs that
- /// were to us and can be failed/claimed by the user
+ /// Map from payment hash to any HTLCs which are to us and can be failed/claimed by the user.
/// Note that while this is held in the same mutex as the channels themselves, no consistency
/// guarantees are made about the channels given here actually existing anymore by the time you
/// go to read them!
- claimable_htlcs: HashMap<(PaymentHash, Option<PaymentSecret>), Vec<ClaimableHTLC>>,
+ claimable_htlcs: HashMap<PaymentHash, Vec<ClaimableHTLC>>,
/// Messages to send to peers - pushed to in the same lock that they are generated in (except
/// for broadcast messages, where ordering isn't as strict).
pub(super) pending_msg_events: Vec<MessageSendEvent>,
/// Time at which this HTLC expires - blocks with a header time above this value will result in
/// this payment being removed.
expiry_time: u64,
+ /// Arbitrary identifier the user specifies (or not)
+ user_payment_id: u64,
// Other required attributes of the payment, optionally enforced:
payment_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>,
min_value_msat: Option<u64>,
/// Storage for PaymentSecrets and any requirements on future inbound payments before we will
/// expose them to users via a PaymentReceived event. HTLCs which do not meet the requirements
/// here are failed when we process them as pending-forwardable-HTLCs, and entries are removed
- /// after we generate a PaymentReceived upon receipt of all MPP parts.
+ /// after we generate a PaymentReceived upon receipt of all MPP parts or when they time out.
/// Locked *after* channel_state.
pending_inbound_payments: Mutex<HashMap<PaymentHash, PendingInboundPayment>>,
pub(crate) const MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT: u16 = 2 * 6 * 24 * 7;
/// The minimum number of blocks between an inbound HTLC's CLTV and the corresponding outbound
-/// HTLC's CLTV. The current default represents roughly six hours of blocks at six blocks/hour.
+/// HTLC's CLTV. The current default represents roughly seven hours of blocks at six blocks/hour.
///
/// This can be increased (but not decreased) through [`ChannelConfig::cltv_expiry_delta`]
///
// i.e. the node we forwarded the payment on to should always have enough room to reliably time out
// the HTLC via a full update_fail_htlc/commitment_signed dance before we hit the
// CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER point (we static assert that it's at least 3 blocks more).
-pub const MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA: u16 = 6 * 6;
+pub const MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA: u16 = 6*7;
pub(super) const CLTV_FAR_FAR_AWAY: u32 = 6 * 24 * 7; //TODO?
+/// Minimum CLTV difference between the current block height and received inbound payments.
+/// Invoices generated for payment to us must set their `min_final_cltv_expiry` field to at least
+/// this value.
+// Note that we fail if exactly HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER + 1 was used, so we need to add one for
+// any payments to succeed. Further, we don't want payments to fail if a block was found while
+// a payment was being routed, so we add an extra block to be safe.
+pub const MIN_FINAL_CLTV_EXPIRY: u32 = HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER + 3;
+
// Check that our CLTV_EXPIRY is at least CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER + ANTI_REORG_DELAY + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS,
// ie that if the next-hop peer fails the HTLC within
// LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS then we'll still have CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER left to timeout it onchain,
#[allow(dead_code)]
const CHECK_CLTV_EXPIRY_SANITY: u32 = MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32 - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER - ANTI_REORG_DELAY - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS;
-// Check for ability of an attacker to make us fail on-chain by delaying inbound claim. See
+// Check for ability of an attacker to make us fail on-chain by delaying an HTLC claim. See
// ChannelMontior::would_broadcast_at_height for a description of why this is needed.
#[deny(const_err)]
#[allow(dead_code)]
/// Note that this means this value is *not* persistent - it can change once during the
/// lifetime of the channel.
pub channel_id: [u8; 32],
+ /// The Channel's funding transaction output, if we've negotiated the funding transaction with
+ /// our counterparty already.
+ ///
+ /// Note that, if this has been set, `channel_id` will be equivalent to
+ /// `funding_txo.unwrap().to_channel_id()`.
+ pub funding_txo: Option<OutPoint>,
/// The position of the funding transaction in the chain. None if the funding transaction has
/// not yet been confirmed and the channel fully opened.
pub short_channel_id: Option<u64>,
/// Note that there are some corner cases not fully handled here, so the actual available
/// inbound capacity may be slightly higher than this.
pub inbound_capacity_msat: u64,
+ /// True if the channel was initiated (and thus funded) by us.
+ pub is_outbound: bool,
+ /// True if the channel is confirmed, funding_locked messages have been exchanged, and the
+ /// channel is not currently being shut down. `funding_locked` message exchange implies the
+ /// required confirmation count has been reached (and we were connected to the peer at some
+ /// point after the funding transaction received enough confirmations).
+ pub is_funding_locked: bool,
/// True if the channel is (a) confirmed and funding_locked messages have been exchanged, (b)
- /// the peer is connected, and (c) no monitor update failure is pending resolution.
- pub is_live: bool,
-
+ /// the peer is connected, (c) no monitor update failure is pending resolution, and (d) the
+ /// channel is not currently negotiating a shutdown.
+ ///
+ /// This is a strict superset of `is_funding_locked`.
+ pub is_usable: bool,
+ /// True if this channel is (or will be) publicly-announced.
+ pub is_public: bool,
/// Information on the fees and requirements that the counterparty requires when forwarding
/// payments to us through this channel.
pub counterparty_forwarding_info: Option<CounterpartyForwardingInfo>,
let (inbound_capacity_msat, outbound_capacity_msat) = channel.get_inbound_outbound_available_balance_msat();
res.push(ChannelDetails {
channel_id: (*channel_id).clone(),
+ funding_txo: channel.get_funding_txo(),
short_channel_id: channel.get_short_channel_id(),
remote_network_id: channel.get_counterparty_node_id(),
counterparty_features: InitFeatures::empty(),
inbound_capacity_msat,
outbound_capacity_msat,
user_id: channel.get_user_id(),
- is_live: channel.is_live(),
+ is_outbound: channel.is_outbound(),
+ is_funding_locked: channel.is_usable(),
+ is_usable: channel.is_live(),
+ is_public: channel.should_announce(),
counterparty_forwarding_info: channel.counterparty_forwarding_info(),
});
}
/// Gets the list of usable channels, in random order. Useful as an argument to
/// get_route to ensure non-announced channels are used.
///
- /// These are guaranteed to have their is_live value set to true, see the documentation for
- /// ChannelDetails::is_live for more info on exactly what the criteria are.
+ /// These are guaranteed to have their [`ChannelDetails::is_usable`] value set to true, see the
+ /// documentation for [`ChannelDetails::is_usable`] for more info on exactly what the criteria
+ /// are.
pub fn list_usable_channels(&self) -> Vec<ChannelDetails> {
// Note we use is_live here instead of usable which leads to somewhat confused
// internal/external nomenclature, but that's ok cause that's probably what the user
msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode { payment_data } => payment_data,
};
+ if payment_data.is_none() {
+ return_err!("We require payment_secrets", 0x4000|0x2000|3, &[0;0]);
+ }
+
// Note that we could obviously respond immediately with an update_fulfill_htlc
// message, however that would leak that we are the recipient of this payment, so
// instead we stay symmetric with the forwarding case, only responding (after a
PendingHTLCStatus::Forward(PendingHTLCInfo {
routing: PendingHTLCRouting::Receive {
- payment_data,
+ payment_data: payment_data.unwrap(),
incoming_cltv_expiry: msg.cltv_expiry,
},
payment_hash: msg.payment_hash.clone(),
/// only Tor Onion addresses.
///
/// Panics if addresses is absurdly large (more than 500).
- pub fn broadcast_node_announcement(&self, rgb: [u8; 3], alias: [u8; 32], addresses: Vec<NetAddress>) {
+ pub fn broadcast_node_announcement(&self, rgb: [u8; 3], alias: [u8; 32], mut addresses: Vec<NetAddress>) {
let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::new(&self.total_consistency_lock, &self.persistence_notifier);
if addresses.len() > 500 {
panic!("More than half the message size was taken up by public addresses!");
}
+ // While all existing nodes handle unsorted addresses just fine, the spec requires that
+ // addresses be sorted for future compatibility.
+ addresses.sort_by_key(|addr| addr.get_id());
+
let announcement = msgs::UnsignedNodeAnnouncement {
features: NodeFeatures::known(),
timestamp: self.last_node_announcement_serial.fetch_add(1, Ordering::AcqRel) as u32,
routing: PendingHTLCRouting::Receive { payment_data, incoming_cltv_expiry },
incoming_shared_secret, payment_hash, amt_to_forward, .. },
prev_funding_outpoint } => {
- let prev_hop = HTLCPreviousHopData {
- short_channel_id: prev_short_channel_id,
- outpoint: prev_funding_outpoint,
- htlc_id: prev_htlc_id,
- incoming_packet_shared_secret: incoming_shared_secret,
- };
-
- let mut total_value = 0;
- let payment_secret_opt =
- if let &Some(ref data) = &payment_data { Some(data.payment_secret.clone()) } else { None };
- let htlcs = channel_state.claimable_htlcs.entry((payment_hash, payment_secret_opt))
- .or_insert(Vec::new());
- htlcs.push(ClaimableHTLC {
- prev_hop,
+ let claimable_htlc = ClaimableHTLC {
+ prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData {
+ short_channel_id: prev_short_channel_id,
+ outpoint: prev_funding_outpoint,
+ htlc_id: prev_htlc_id,
+ incoming_packet_shared_secret: incoming_shared_secret,
+ },
value: amt_to_forward,
payment_data: payment_data.clone(),
cltv_expiry: incoming_cltv_expiry,
- });
- if let &Some(ref data) = &payment_data {
- for htlc in htlcs.iter() {
- total_value += htlc.value;
- if htlc.payment_data.as_ref().unwrap().total_msat != data.total_msat {
- total_value = msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT;
- }
- if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT { break; }
- }
- if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT || total_value > data.total_msat {
- for htlc in htlcs.iter() {
- let mut htlc_msat_height_data = byte_utils::be64_to_array(htlc.value).to_vec();
- htlc_msat_height_data.extend_from_slice(
- &byte_utils::be32_to_array(self.best_block.read().unwrap().height()),
- );
- failed_forwards.push((HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData {
- short_channel_id: htlc.prev_hop.short_channel_id,
- outpoint: prev_funding_outpoint,
- htlc_id: htlc.prev_hop.htlc_id,
- incoming_packet_shared_secret: htlc.prev_hop.incoming_packet_shared_secret,
- }), payment_hash,
- HTLCFailReason::Reason { failure_code: 0x4000 | 15, data: htlc_msat_height_data }
- ));
- }
- } else if total_value == data.total_msat {
- new_events.push(events::Event::PaymentReceived {
- payment_hash,
- payment_secret: Some(data.payment_secret),
- amt: total_value,
- });
+ };
+
+ macro_rules! fail_htlc {
+ ($htlc: expr) => {
+ let mut htlc_msat_height_data = byte_utils::be64_to_array($htlc.value).to_vec();
+ htlc_msat_height_data.extend_from_slice(
+ &byte_utils::be32_to_array(self.best_block.read().unwrap().height()),
+ );
+ failed_forwards.push((HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData {
+ short_channel_id: $htlc.prev_hop.short_channel_id,
+ outpoint: prev_funding_outpoint,
+ htlc_id: $htlc.prev_hop.htlc_id,
+ incoming_packet_shared_secret: $htlc.prev_hop.incoming_packet_shared_secret,
+ }), payment_hash,
+ HTLCFailReason::Reason { failure_code: 0x4000 | 15, data: htlc_msat_height_data }
+ ));
}
- } else {
- new_events.push(events::Event::PaymentReceived {
- payment_hash,
- payment_secret: None,
- amt: amt_to_forward,
- });
}
+
+ // Check that the payment hash and secret are known. Note that we
+ // MUST take care to handle the "unknown payment hash" and
+ // "incorrect payment secret" cases here identically or we'd expose
+ // that we are the ultimate recipient of the given payment hash.
+ // Further, we must not expose whether we have any other HTLCs
+ // associated with the same payment_hash pending or not.
+ let mut payment_secrets = self.pending_inbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
+ match payment_secrets.entry(payment_hash) {
+ hash_map::Entry::Vacant(_) => {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as we didn't have a corresponding inbound payment.", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
+ fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
+ },
+ hash_map::Entry::Occupied(inbound_payment) => {
+ if inbound_payment.get().payment_secret != payment_data.payment_secret {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as it didn't match our expected payment secret.", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
+ fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
+ } else if inbound_payment.get().min_value_msat.is_some() && payment_data.total_msat < inbound_payment.get().min_value_msat.unwrap() {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as it didn't match our minimum value (had {}, needed {}).",
+ log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), payment_data.total_msat, inbound_payment.get().min_value_msat.unwrap());
+ fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
+ } else {
+ let mut total_value = 0;
+ let htlcs = channel_state.claimable_htlcs.entry(payment_hash)
+ .or_insert(Vec::new());
+ htlcs.push(claimable_htlc);
+ for htlc in htlcs.iter() {
+ total_value += htlc.value;
+ if htlc.payment_data.total_msat != payment_data.total_msat {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLCs with payment_hash {} as the HTLCs had inconsistent total values (eg {} and {})",
+ log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), payment_data.total_msat, htlc.payment_data.total_msat);
+ total_value = msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT;
+ }
+ if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT { break; }
+ }
+ if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT || total_value > payment_data.total_msat {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLCs with payment_hash {} as the total value {} ran over expected value {} (or HTLCs were inconsistent)",
+ log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), total_value, payment_data.total_msat);
+ for htlc in htlcs.iter() {
+ fail_htlc!(htlc);
+ }
+ } else if total_value == payment_data.total_msat {
+ new_events.push(events::Event::PaymentReceived {
+ payment_hash,
+ payment_preimage: inbound_payment.get().payment_preimage,
+ payment_secret: payment_data.payment_secret,
+ amt: total_value,
+ user_payment_id: inbound_payment.get().user_payment_id,
+ });
+ // Only ever generate at most one PaymentReceived
+ // per registered payment_hash, even if it isn't
+ // claimed.
+ inbound_payment.remove_entry();
+ } else {
+ // Nothing to do - we haven't reached the total
+ // payment value yet, wait until we receive more
+ // MPP parts.
+ }
+ }
+ },
+ };
},
HTLCForwardInfo::AddHTLC { .. } => {
panic!("short_channel_id == 0 should imply any pending_forward entries are of type Receive");
/// along the path (including in our own channel on which we received it).
/// Returns false if no payment was found to fail backwards, true if the process of failing the
/// HTLC backwards has been started.
- pub fn fail_htlc_backwards(&self, payment_hash: &PaymentHash, payment_secret: &Option<PaymentSecret>) -> bool {
+ pub fn fail_htlc_backwards(&self, payment_hash: &PaymentHash) -> bool {
let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::new(&self.total_consistency_lock, &self.persistence_notifier);
let mut channel_state = Some(self.channel_state.lock().unwrap());
- let removed_source = channel_state.as_mut().unwrap().claimable_htlcs.remove(&(*payment_hash, *payment_secret));
+ let removed_source = channel_state.as_mut().unwrap().claimable_htlcs.remove(payment_hash);
if let Some(mut sources) = removed_source {
for htlc in sources.drain(..) {
if channel_state.is_none() { channel_state = Some(self.channel_state.lock().unwrap()); }
/// generating message events for the net layer to claim the payment, if possible. Thus, you
/// should probably kick the net layer to go send messages if this returns true!
///
- /// You must specify the expected amounts for this HTLC, and we will only claim HTLCs
- /// available within a few percent of the expected amount. This is critical for several
- /// reasons : a) it avoids providing senders with `proof-of-payment` (in the form of the
- /// payment_preimage without having provided the full value and b) it avoids certain
- /// privacy-breaking recipient-probing attacks which may reveal payment activity to
- /// motivated attackers.
- ///
- /// Note that the privacy concerns in (b) are not relevant in payments with a payment_secret
- /// set. Thus, for such payments we will claim any payments which do not under-pay.
+ /// Note that if you did not set an `amount_msat` when calling [`create_inbound_payment`] or
+ /// [`create_inbound_payment_for_hash`] you must check that the amount in the `PaymentReceived`
+ /// event matches your expectation. If you fail to do so and call this method, you may provide
+ /// the sender "proof-of-payment" when they did not fulfill the full expected payment.
///
/// May panic if called except in response to a PaymentReceived event.
- pub fn claim_funds(&self, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage, payment_secret: &Option<PaymentSecret>, expected_amount: u64) -> bool {
+ ///
+ /// [`create_inbound_payment`]: Self::create_inbound_payment
+ /// [`create_inbound_payment_for_hash`]: Self::create_inbound_payment_for_hash
+ pub fn claim_funds(&self, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage) -> bool {
let payment_hash = PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&payment_preimage.0).into_inner());
let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::new(&self.total_consistency_lock, &self.persistence_notifier);
let mut channel_state = Some(self.channel_state.lock().unwrap());
- let removed_source = channel_state.as_mut().unwrap().claimable_htlcs.remove(&(payment_hash, *payment_secret));
+ let removed_source = channel_state.as_mut().unwrap().claimable_htlcs.remove(&payment_hash);
if let Some(mut sources) = removed_source {
assert!(!sources.is_empty());
// we got all the HTLCs and then a channel closed while we were waiting for the user to
// provide the preimage, so worrying too much about the optimal handling isn't worth
// it.
-
- let (is_mpp, mut valid_mpp) = if let &Some(ref data) = &sources[0].payment_data {
- assert!(payment_secret.is_some());
- (true, data.total_msat >= expected_amount)
- } else {
- assert!(payment_secret.is_none());
- (false, false)
- };
-
+ let mut valid_mpp = true;
for htlc in sources.iter() {
- if !is_mpp || !valid_mpp { break; }
if let None = channel_state.as_ref().unwrap().short_to_id.get(&htlc.prev_hop.short_channel_id) {
valid_mpp = false;
+ break;
}
}
let mut errs = Vec::new();
let mut claimed_any_htlcs = false;
for htlc in sources.drain(..) {
- if channel_state.is_none() { channel_state = Some(self.channel_state.lock().unwrap()); }
- if (is_mpp && !valid_mpp) || (!is_mpp && (htlc.value < expected_amount || htlc.value > expected_amount * 2)) {
+ if !valid_mpp {
+ if channel_state.is_none() { channel_state = Some(self.channel_state.lock().unwrap()); }
let mut htlc_msat_height_data = byte_utils::be64_to_array(htlc.value).to_vec();
htlc_msat_height_data.extend_from_slice(&byte_utils::be32_to_array(
self.best_block.read().unwrap().height()));
claimed_any_htlcs = true;
} else { errs.push(e); }
},
- Err(None) if is_mpp => unreachable!("We already checked for channel existence, we can't fail here!"),
- Err(None) => {
- log_warn!(self.logger, "Channel we expected to claim an HTLC from was closed.");
- },
+ Err(None) => unreachable!("We already checked for channel existence, we can't fail here!"),
Ok(()) => claimed_any_htlcs = true,
}
}
},
}
if let Some(tx) = funding_broadcastable {
+ log_info!(self.logger, "Broadcasting funding transaction with txid {}", tx.txid());
self.tx_broadcaster.broadcast_transaction(&tx);
}
if let Some(msg) = funding_locked {
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(_) => return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::send_err_msg_no_close("Failed to find corresponding channel".to_owned(), msg.channel_id))
}
};
+ log_info!(self.logger, "Broadcasting funding transaction with txid {}", funding_tx.txid());
self.tx_broadcaster.broadcast_transaction(&funding_tx);
Ok(())
}
}
};
if let Some(broadcast_tx) = tx {
- log_trace!(self.logger, "Broadcast onchain {}", log_tx!(broadcast_tx));
+ log_info!(self.logger, "Broadcasting {}", log_tx!(broadcast_tx));
self.tx_broadcaster.broadcast_transaction(&broadcast_tx);
}
if let Some(chan) = chan_option {
}
}
- fn set_payment_hash_secret_map(&self, payment_hash: PaymentHash, payment_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>, min_value_msat: Option<u64>, invoice_expiry_delta_secs: u32) -> Result<PaymentSecret, APIError> {
+ fn set_payment_hash_secret_map(&self, payment_hash: PaymentHash, payment_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>, min_value_msat: Option<u64>, invoice_expiry_delta_secs: u32
, user_payment_id: u64) -> Result<PaymentSecret, APIError> {
assert!(invoice_expiry_delta_secs <= 60*60*24*365); // Sadly bitcoin timestamps are u32s, so panic before 2106
let payment_secret = PaymentSecret(self.keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes());
match payment_secrets.entry(payment_hash) {
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(e) => {
e.insert(PendingInboundPayment {
- payment_secret, min_value_msat, payment_preimage,
+ payment_secret, min_value_msat, user_payment_id, payment_preimage,
// We assume that highest_seen_timestamp is pretty close to the current time -
// its updated when we receive a new block with the maximum time we've seen in
// a header. It should never be more than two hours in the future.
/// This differs from [`create_inbound_payment_for_hash`] only in that it generates the
/// [`PaymentHash`] and [`PaymentPreimage`] for you, returning the first and storing the second.
///
+ /// The [`PaymentPreimage`] will ultimately be returned to you in the [`PaymentReceived`], which
+ /// will have the [`PaymentReceived::payment_preimage`] field filled in. That should then be
+ /// passed directly to [`claim_funds`].
+ ///
/// See [`create_inbound_payment_for_hash`] for detailed documentation on behavior and requirements.
///
+ /// [`claim_funds`]: Self::claim_funds
+ /// [`PaymentReceived`]: events::Event::PaymentReceived
+ /// [`PaymentReceived::payment_preimage`]: events::Event::PaymentReceived::payment_preimage
/// [`create_inbound_payment_for_hash`]: Self::create_inbound_payment_for_hash
- pub fn create_inbound_payment(&self, min_value_msat: Option<u64>, invoice_expiry_delta_secs: u32) -> (PaymentHash, PaymentSecret) {
+ pub fn create_inbound_payment(&self, min_value_msat: Option<u64>, invoice_expiry_delta_secs: u32, user_payment_id: u64) -> (PaymentHash, PaymentSecret) {
let payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage(self.keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes());
let payment_hash = PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&payment_preimage.0).into_inner());
(payment_hash,
- self.set_payment_hash_secret_map(payment_hash, Some(payment_preimage), min_value_msat, invoice_expiry_delta_secs)
+ self.set_payment_hash_secret_map(payment_hash, Some(payment_preimage), min_value_msat, invoice_expiry_delta_secs, user_payment_id)
.expect("RNG Generated Duplicate PaymentHash"))
}
/// The [`PaymentHash`] (and corresponding [`PaymentPreimage`]) must be globally unique. This
/// method may return an Err if another payment with the same payment_hash is still pending.
///
+ /// `user_payment_id` will be provided back in [`PaymentReceived::user_payment_id`] events to
+ /// allow tracking of which events correspond with which calls to this and
+ /// [`create_inbound_payment`]. `user_payment_id` has no meaning inside of LDK, it is simply
+ /// copied to events and otherwise ignored. It may be used to correlate PaymentReceived events
+ /// with invoice metadata stored elsewhere.
+ ///
/// `min_value_msat` should be set if the invoice being generated contains a value. Any payment
/// received for the returned [`PaymentHash`] will be required to be at least `min_value_msat`
/// before a [`PaymentReceived`] event will be generated, ensuring that we do not provide the
/// `invoice_expiry_delta_secs` describes the number of seconds that the invoice is valid for
/// in excess of the current time. This should roughly match the expiry time set in the invoice.
/// After this many seconds, we will remove the inbound payment, resulting in any attempts to
- /// pay the invoice failing. The BOLT spec suggests 7,200 secs as a default validity time for
+ /// pay the invoice failing. The BOLT spec suggests 3,600 secs as a default validity time for
/// invoices when no timeout is set.
///
/// Note that we use block header time to time-out pending inbound payments (with some margin
/// If you need exact expiry semantics, you should enforce them upon receipt of
/// [`PaymentReceived`].
///
+ /// Pending inbound payments are stored in memory and in serialized versions of this
+ /// [`ChannelManager`]. If potentially unbounded numbers of inbound payments may exist and
+ /// space is limited, you may wish to rate-limit inbound payment creation.
+ ///
/// May panic if `invoice_expiry_delta_secs` is greater than one year.
///
+ /// Note that invoices generated for inbound payments should have their `min_final_cltv_expiry`
+ /// set to at least [`MIN_FINAL_CLTV_EXPIRY`].
+ ///
/// [`create_inbound_payment`]: Self::create_inbound_payment
/// [`PaymentReceived`]: events::Event::PaymentReceived
- pub fn create_inbound_payment_for_hash(&self, payment_hash: PaymentHash, min_value_msat: Option<u64>, invoice_expiry_delta_secs: u32) -> Result<PaymentSecret, APIError> {
- self.set_payment_hash_secret_map(payment_hash, None, min_value_msat, invoice_expiry_delta_secs)
+ /// [`PaymentReceived::user_payment_id`]: events::Event::PaymentReceived::user_payment_id
+ pub fn create_inbound_payment_for_hash(&self, payment_hash: PaymentHash, min_value_msat: Option<u64>, invoice_expiry_delta_secs: u32, user_payment_id: u64) -> Result<PaymentSecret, APIError> {
+ self.set_payment_hash_secret_map(payment_hash, None, min_value_msat, invoice_expiry_delta_secs, user_payment_id)
}
}
}
max_time!(self.last_node_announcement_serial);
max_time!(self.highest_seen_timestamp);
+ let mut payment_secrets = self.pending_inbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
+ payment_secrets.retain(|_, inbound_payment| {
+ inbound_payment.expiry_time > header.time as u64
+ });
}
fn get_relevant_txids(&self) -> Vec<Txid> {
});
if let Some(height) = height_opt {
- channel_state.claimable_htlcs.retain(|&(ref payment_hash, _), htlcs| {
+ channel_state.claimable_htlcs.retain(|payment_hash, htlcs| {
htlcs.retain(|htlc| {
// If height is approaching the number of blocks we think it takes us to get
// our commitment transaction confirmed before the HTLC expires, plus the
}
}
-impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref + Sync + Send, T: Deref + Sync + Send, K: Deref + Sync + Send, F: Deref + Sync + Send, L: Deref + Sync + Send>
+impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref , T: Deref , K: Deref , F: Deref , L: Deref >
ChannelMessageHandler for ChannelManager<Signer, M, T, K, F, L>
where M::Target: chain::Watch<Signer>,
T::Target: BroadcasterInterface,
},
&PendingHTLCRouting::Receive { ref payment_data, ref incoming_cltv_expiry } => {
1u8.write(writer)?;
- payment_data.write(writer)?;
+ payment_data.payment_secret.write(writer)?;
+ payment_data.total_msat.write(writer)?;
incoming_cltv_expiry.write(writer)?;
},
}
short_channel_id: Readable::read(reader)?,
},
1u8 => PendingHTLCRouting::Receive {
- payment_data: Readable::read(reader)?,
+ payment_data: msgs::FinalOnionHopData {
+ payment_secret: Readable::read(reader)?,
+ total_msat: Readable::read(reader)?,
+ },
incoming_cltv_expiry: Readable::read(reader)?,
},
_ => return Err(DecodeError::InvalidValue),
incoming_packet_shared_secret
});
-impl_writeable!(ClaimableHTLC, 0, {
- prev_hop,
- value,
- payment_data,
- cltv_expiry
-});
+impl Writeable for ClaimableHTLC {
+ fn write<W: Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), ::std::io::Error> {
+ self.prev_hop.write(writer)?;
+ self.value.write(writer)?;
+ self.payment_data.payment_secret.write(writer)?;
+ self.payment_data.total_msat.write(writer)?;
+ self.cltv_expiry.write(writer)
+ }
+}
+
+impl Readable for ClaimableHTLC {
+ fn read<R: ::std::io::Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<Self, DecodeError> {
+ Ok(ClaimableHTLC {
+ prev_hop: Readable::read(reader)?,
+ value: Readable::read(reader)?,
+ payment_data: msgs::FinalOnionHopData {
+ payment_secret: Readable::read(reader)?,
+ total_msat: Readable::read(reader)?,
+ },
+ cltv_expiry: Readable::read(reader)?,
+ })
+ }
+}
impl Writeable for HTLCSource {
fn write<W: Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), ::std::io::Error> {
impl_writeable!(PendingInboundPayment, 0, {
payment_secret,
expiry_time,
+ user_payment_id,
payment_preimage,
min_value_msat
});
let dummy_graph = NetworkGraph::new(genesis_hash);
+ let mut payment_count: u64 = 0;
macro_rules! send_payment {
($node_a: expr, $node_b: expr) => {
let usable_channels = $node_a.list_usable_channels();
let route = get_route(&$node_a.get_our_node_id(), &dummy_graph, &$node_b.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()),
Some(&usable_channels.iter().map(|r| r).collect::<Vec<_>>()), &[], 10_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger_a).unwrap();
- let payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([0; 32]);
+ let mut payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([0; 32]);
+ payment_preimage.0[0..8].copy_from_slice(&payment_count.to_le_bytes());
+ payment_count += 1;
let payment_hash = PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&payment_preimage.0[..]).into_inner());
+ let payment_secret = $node_b.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, None, 7200, 0).unwrap();
- $node_a.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &None).unwrap();
+ $node_a.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap();
let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event($node_a.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().pop().unwrap());
$node_b.handle_update_add_htlc(&$node_a.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
$node_b.handle_commitment_signed(&$node_a.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg);
$node_b.handle_revoke_and_ack(&$node_a.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_a }, MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, $node_b.get_our_node_id()));
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_b });
- expect_payment_received!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_b }, payment_hash, 10_000);
- assert!($node_b.claim_funds(payment_preimage, &None, 10_000));
+ expect_payment_received!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_b }, payment_hash, payment_secret, 10_000);
+ assert!($node_b.claim_funds(payment_preimage));
match $node_b.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().pop().unwrap() {
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id, updates } => {
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff