}
}
+/// Return value for claim_funds_from_hop
+enum ClaimFundsFromHop {
+ PrevHopForceClosed,
+ MonitorUpdateFail(PublicKey, MsgHandleErrInternal, Option<u64>),
+ Success(u64),
+ DuplicateClaim,
+}
+
type ShutdownResult = (Option<(OutPoint, ChannelMonitorUpdate)>, Vec<(HTLCSource, PaymentHash)>);
/// Error type returned across the channel_state mutex boundary. When an Err is generated for a
// for now more than 10 paths likely carries too much one-path failure.
return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::RouteError{err: "Sending over more than 10 paths is not currently supported"}));
}
+ if payment_secret.is_none() && route.paths.len() > 1 {
+ return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError{err: "Payment secret is required for multi-path payments".to_string()}));
+ }
let mut total_value = 0;
let our_node_id = self.get_our_node_id();
let mut path_errs = Vec::with_capacity(route.paths.len());
/// would be able to guess -- otherwise, an intermediate node may claim the payment and it will
/// never reach the recipient.
///
+ /// See [`send_payment`] documentation for more details on the return value of this function.
+ ///
/// Similar to regular payments, you MUST NOT reuse a `payment_preimage` value. See
/// [`send_payment`] for more information about the risks of duplicate preimage usage.
///
+ /// Note that `route` must have exactly one path.
+ ///
/// [`send_payment`]: Self::send_payment
pub fn send_spontaneous_payment(&self, route: &Route, payment_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>) -> Result<PaymentHash, PaymentSendFailure> {
let preimage = match payment_preimage {
HTLCFailReason::Reason { failure_code: 0x4000|15, data: htlc_msat_height_data });
} else {
match self.claim_funds_from_hop(channel_state.as_mut().unwrap(), htlc.prev_hop, payment_preimage) {
- Err(Some(e)) => {
- if let msgs::ErrorAction::IgnoreError = e.1.err.action {
+ ClaimFundsFromHop::MonitorUpdateFail(pk, err, _) => {
+ if let msgs::ErrorAction::IgnoreError = err.err.action {
// We got a temporary failure updating monitor, but will claim the
// HTLC when the monitor updating is restored (or on chain).
- log_error!(self.logger, "Temporary failure claiming HTLC, treating as success: {}", e.1.err.err);
+ log_error!(self.logger, "Temporary failure claiming HTLC, treating as success: {}", err.err.err);
claimed_any_htlcs = true;
- } else { errs.push(e); }
+ } else { errs.push((pk, err)); }
+ },
+ ClaimFundsFromHop::PrevHopForceClosed => unreachable!("We already checked for channel existence, we can't fail here!"),
+ ClaimFundsFromHop::DuplicateClaim => {
+ // While we should never get here in most cases, if we do, it likely
+ // indicates that the HTLC was timed out some time ago and is no longer
+ // available to be claimed. Thus, it does not make sense to set
+ // `claimed_any_htlcs`.
},
- Err(None) => unreachable!("We already checked for channel existence, we can't fail here!"),
- Ok(()) => claimed_any_htlcs = true,
+ ClaimFundsFromHop::Success(_) => claimed_any_htlcs = true,
}
}
}
} else { false }
}
- fn claim_funds_from_hop(&self, channel_state_lock: &mut MutexGuard<ChannelHolder<Signer>>, prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage) -> Result<(), Option<(PublicKey, MsgHandleErrInternal)>> {
+ fn claim_funds_from_hop(&self, channel_state_lock: &mut MutexGuard<ChannelHolder<Signer>>, prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage) -> ClaimFundsFromHop {
//TODO: Delay the claimed_funds relaying just like we do outbound relay!
let channel_state = &mut **channel_state_lock;
let chan_id = match channel_state.short_to_id.get(&prev_hop.short_channel_id) {
Some(chan_id) => chan_id.clone(),
None => {
- return Err(None)
+ return ClaimFundsFromHop::PrevHopForceClosed
}
};
if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut chan) = channel_state.by_id.entry(chan_id) {
match chan.get_mut().get_update_fulfill_htlc_and_commit(prev_hop.htlc_id, payment_preimage, &self.logger) {
Ok(msgs_monitor_option) => {
- if let UpdateFulfillCommitFetch::NewClaim { msgs, monitor_update } = msgs_monitor_option {
+ if let UpdateFulfillCommitFetch::NewClaim { msgs, htlc_value_msat, monitor_update } = msgs_monitor_option {
if let Err(e) = self.chain_monitor.update_channel(chan.get().get_funding_txo().unwrap(), monitor_update) {
log_given_level!(self.logger, if e == ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::PermanentFailure { Level::Error } else { Level::Debug },
"Failed to update channel monitor with preimage {:?}: {:?}",
payment_preimage, e);
- return Err(Some((
+ return ClaimFundsFromHop::MonitorUpdateFail(
chan.get().get_counterparty_node_id(),
handle_monitor_err!(self, e, channel_state, chan, RAACommitmentOrder::CommitmentFirst, false, msgs.is_some()).unwrap_err(),
- )));
+ Some(htlc_value_msat)
+ );
}
if let Some((msg, commitment_signed)) = msgs {
log_debug!(self.logger, "Claiming funds for HTLC with preimage {} resulted in a commitment_signed for channel {}",
}
});
}
+ return ClaimFundsFromHop::Success(htlc_value_msat);
+ } else {
+ return ClaimFundsFromHop::DuplicateClaim;
}
- return Ok(())
},
Err((e, monitor_update)) => {
if let Err(e) = self.chain_monitor.update_channel(chan.get().get_funding_txo().unwrap(), monitor_update) {
if drop {
chan.remove_entry();
}
- return Err(Some((counterparty_node_id, res)));
+ return ClaimFundsFromHop::MonitorUpdateFail(counterparty_node_id, res, None);
},
}
} else { unreachable!(); }
}
- fn claim_funds_internal(&self, mut channel_state_lock: MutexGuard<ChannelHolder<Signer>>, source: HTLCSource, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage) {
+ fn claim_funds_internal(&self, mut channel_state_lock: MutexGuard<ChannelHolder<Signer>>, source: HTLCSource, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage, forwarded_htlc_value_msat: Option<u64>, from_onchain: bool) {
match source {
HTLCSource::OutboundRoute { session_priv, .. } => {
mem::drop(channel_state_lock);
},
HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(hop_data) => {
let prev_outpoint = hop_data.outpoint;
- if let Err((counterparty_node_id, err)) = match self.claim_funds_from_hop(&mut channel_state_lock, hop_data, payment_preimage) {
- Ok(()) => Ok(()),
- Err(None) => {
- let preimage_update = ChannelMonitorUpdate {
- update_id: CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID,
- updates: vec![ChannelMonitorUpdateStep::PaymentPreimage {
- payment_preimage: payment_preimage.clone(),
- }],
- };
- // We update the ChannelMonitor on the backward link, after
- // receiving an offchain preimage event from the forward link (the
- // event being update_fulfill_htlc).
- if let Err(e) = self.chain_monitor.update_channel(prev_outpoint, preimage_update) {
- log_error!(self.logger, "Critical error: failed to update channel monitor with preimage {:?}: {:?}",
- payment_preimage, e);
- }
- Ok(())
- },
- Err(Some(res)) => Err(res),
- } {
- mem::drop(channel_state_lock);
- let res: Result<(), _> = Err(err);
- let _ = handle_error!(self, res, counterparty_node_id);
+ let res = self.claim_funds_from_hop(&mut channel_state_lock, hop_data, payment_preimage);
+ let claimed_htlc = if let ClaimFundsFromHop::DuplicateClaim = res { false } else { true };
+ let htlc_claim_value_msat = match res {
+ ClaimFundsFromHop::MonitorUpdateFail(_, _, amt_opt) => amt_opt,
+ ClaimFundsFromHop::Success(amt) => Some(amt),
+ _ => None,
+ };
+ if let ClaimFundsFromHop::PrevHopForceClosed = res {
+ let preimage_update = ChannelMonitorUpdate {
+ update_id: CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID,
+ updates: vec![ChannelMonitorUpdateStep::PaymentPreimage {
+ payment_preimage: payment_preimage.clone(),
+ }],
+ };
+ // We update the ChannelMonitor on the backward link, after
+ // receiving an offchain preimage event from the forward link (the
+ // event being update_fulfill_htlc).
+ if let Err(e) = self.chain_monitor.update_channel(prev_outpoint, preimage_update) {
+ log_error!(self.logger, "Critical error: failed to update channel monitor with preimage {:?}: {:?}",
+ payment_preimage, e);
+ }
+ // Note that we do *not* set `claimed_htlc` to false here. In fact, this
+ // totally could be a duplicate claim, but we have no way of knowing
+ // without interrogating the `ChannelMonitor` we've provided the above
+ // update to. Instead, we simply document in `PaymentForwarded` that this
+ // can happen.
+ }
+ mem::drop(channel_state_lock);
+ if let ClaimFundsFromHop::MonitorUpdateFail(pk, err, _) = res {
+ let result: Result<(), _> = Err(err);
+ let _ = handle_error!(self, result, pk);
+ }
+
+ if claimed_htlc {
+ if let Some(forwarded_htlc_value) = forwarded_htlc_value_msat {
+ let fee_earned_msat = if let Some(claimed_htlc_value) = htlc_claim_value_msat {
+ Some(claimed_htlc_value - forwarded_htlc_value)
+ } else { None };
+
+ let mut pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
+ pending_events.push(events::Event::PaymentForwarded {
+ fee_earned_msat,
+ claim_from_onchain_tx: from_onchain,
+ });
+ }
}
},
}
fn internal_update_fulfill_htlc(&self, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, msg: &msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC) -> Result<(), MsgHandleErrInternal> {
let mut channel_lock = self.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
- let htlc_source = {
+ let (htlc_source, forwarded_htlc_value) = {
let channel_state = &mut *channel_lock;
match channel_state.by_id.entry(msg.channel_id) {
hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut chan) => {
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(_) => return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::send_err_msg_no_close("Failed to find corresponding channel".to_owned(), msg.channel_id))
}
};
- self.claim_funds_internal(channel_lock, htlc_source, msg.payment_preimage.clone());
+ self.claim_funds_internal(channel_lock, htlc_source, msg.payment_preimage.clone(), Some(forwarded_htlc_value), false);
Ok(())
}
/// Process pending events from the `chain::Watch`, returning whether any events were processed.
fn process_pending_monitor_events(&self) -> bool {
let mut failed_channels = Vec::new();
- let pending_monitor_events = self.chain_monitor.release_pending_monitor_events();
+ let mut pending_monitor_events = self.chain_monitor.release_pending_monitor_events();
let has_pending_monitor_events = !pending_monitor_events.is_empty();
- for monitor_event in pending_monitor_events {
+ for monitor_event in pending_monitor_events.drain(..) {
match monitor_event {
MonitorEvent::HTLCEvent(htlc_update) => {
if let Some(preimage) = htlc_update.payment_preimage {
log_trace!(self.logger, "Claiming HTLC with preimage {} from our monitor", log_bytes!(preimage.0));
- self.claim_funds_internal(self.channel_state.lock().unwrap(), htlc_update.source, preimage);
+ self.claim_funds_internal(self.channel_state.lock().unwrap(), htlc_update.source, preimage, htlc_update.onchain_value_satoshis.map(|v| v * 1000), true);
} else {
log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLC with hash {} from our monitor", log_bytes!(htlc_update.payment_hash.0));
self.fail_htlc_backwards_internal(self.channel_state.lock().unwrap(), htlc_update.source, &htlc_update.payment_hash, HTLCFailReason::Reason { failure_code: 0x4000 | 8, data: Vec::new() });
channel.get_cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number() > monitor.get_cur_counterparty_commitment_number() ||
channel.get_latest_monitor_update_id() < monitor.get_latest_update_id() {
// But if the channel is behind of the monitor, close the channel:
+ log_error!(args.logger, "A ChannelManager is stale compared to the current ChannelMonitor!");
+ log_error!(args.logger, " The channel will be force-closed and the latest commitment transaction from the ChannelMonitor broadcast.");
+ log_error!(args.logger, " The ChannelMonitor for channel {} is at update_id {} but the ChannelManager is at update_id {}.",
+ log_bytes!(channel.channel_id()), monitor.get_latest_update_id(), channel.get_latest_monitor_update_id());
let (_, mut new_failed_htlcs) = channel.force_shutdown(true);
failed_htlcs.append(&mut new_failed_htlcs);
monitor.broadcast_latest_holder_commitment_txn(&args.tx_broadcaster, &args.logger);
use bitcoin::hashes::sha256::Hash as Sha256;
use core::time::Duration;
use ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash, PaymentSecret};
+ use ln::channelmanager::PaymentSendFailure;
use ln::features::{InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures};
use ln::functional_test_utils::*;
use ln::msgs;
use ln::msgs::ChannelMessageHandler;
use routing::router::{get_keysend_route, get_route};
+ use util::errors::APIError;
use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider};
use util::test_utils;
nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "We don't support MPP keysend payments".to_string(), 1);
}
+
+ #[test]
+ fn test_multi_hop_missing_secret() {
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ let chan_1_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
+ let chan_2_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
+ let chan_3_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
+ let chan_4_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
+ let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+
+ // Marshall an MPP route.
+ let (_, payment_hash, _) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[3]);
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler;
+ let mut route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
+ let path = route.paths[0].clone();
+ route.paths.push(path);
+ route.paths[0][0].pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
+ route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id = chan_1_id;
+ route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id = chan_3_id;
+ route.paths[1][0].pubkey = nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id();
+ route.paths[1][0].short_channel_id = chan_2_id;
+ route.paths[1][1].short_channel_id = chan_4_id;
+
+ match nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &None).unwrap_err() {
+ PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError { ref err }) => {
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Payment secret is required for multi-path payments").unwrap().is_match(err)) },
+ _ => panic!("unexpected error")
+ }
+ }
}
#[cfg(all(any(test, feature = "_test_utils"), feature = "unstable"))]
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff