use crate::chain::keysinterface::{Sign, KeysInterface, KeysManager, Recipient};
use crate::util::config::{UserConfig, ChannelConfig};
use crate::util::events::{Event, EventHandler, EventsProvider, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination};
-use crate::util::{byte_utils, events};
+use crate::util::events;
use crate::util::wakers::{Future, Notifier};
use crate::util::scid_utils::fake_scid;
use crate::util::ser::{BigSize, FixedLengthReader, Readable, ReadableArgs, MaybeReadable, Writeable, Writer, VecWriter};
channel_state: Mutex<ChannelHolder<<K::Target as KeysInterface>::Signer>>,
/// Storage for PaymentSecrets and any requirements on future inbound payments before we will
- /// expose them to users via a PaymentReceived event. HTLCs which do not meet the requirements
+ /// expose them to users via a PaymentClaimable event. HTLCs which do not meet the requirements
/// here are failed when we process them as pending-forwardable-HTLCs, and entries are removed
- /// after we generate a PaymentReceived upon receipt of all MPP parts or when they time out.
+ /// after we generate a PaymentClaimable upon receipt of all MPP parts or when they time out.
///
/// See `ChannelManager` struct-level documentation for lock order requirements.
pending_inbound_payments: Mutex<HashMap<PaymentHash, PendingInboundPayment>>,
return Err(ReceiveError {
msg: "Upstream node set CLTV to the wrong value",
err_code: 18,
- err_data: byte_utils::be32_to_array(cltv_expiry).to_vec()
+ err_data: cltv_expiry.to_be_bytes().to_vec()
})
}
// final_expiry_too_soon
if hop_data.amt_to_forward > amt_msat {
return Err(ReceiveError {
err_code: 19,
- err_data: byte_utils::be64_to_array(amt_msat).to_vec(),
+ err_data: amt_msat.to_be_bytes().to_vec(),
msg: "Upstream node sent less than we were supposed to receive in payment",
});
}
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&session_priv_bytes[..]).expect("RNG is busted");
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&self.secp_ctx, &path, &session_priv)
- .map_err(|_| APIError::RouteError{err: "Pubkey along hop was maliciously selected"})?;
+ .map_err(|_| APIError::InvalidRoute{err: "Pubkey along hop was maliciously selected"})?;
let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(path, total_value, payment_secret, cur_height, keysend_preimage)?;
if onion_utils::route_size_insane(&onion_payloads) {
- return Err(APIError::RouteError{err: "Route size too large considering onion data"});
+ return Err(APIError::InvalidRoute{err: "Route size too large considering onion data"});
}
let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, prng_seed, payment_hash);
if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut chan) = channel_state.by_id.entry(id) {
match {
if chan.get().get_counterparty_node_id() != path.first().unwrap().pubkey {
- return Err(APIError::RouteError{err: "Node ID mismatch on first hop!"});
+ return Err(APIError::InvalidRoute{err: "Node ID mismatch on first hop!"});
}
if !chan.get().is_live() {
return Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err: "Peer for first hop currently disconnected/pending monitor update!".to_owned()});
/// fields for more info.
///
/// If a pending payment is currently in-flight with the same [`PaymentId`] provided, this
- /// method will error with an [`APIError::RouteError`]. Note, however, that once a payment
+ /// method will error with an [`APIError::InvalidRoute`]. Note, however, that once a payment
/// is no longer pending (either via [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`], or handling of an
/// [`Event::PaymentSent`]) LDK will not stop you from sending a second payment with the same
/// [`PaymentId`].
/// PaymentSendFailure for more info.
///
/// In general, a path may raise:
- /// * [`APIError::RouteError`] when an invalid route or forwarding parameter (cltv_delta, fee,
+ /// * [`APIError::InvalidRoute`] when an invalid route or forwarding parameter (cltv_delta, fee,
/// node public key) is specified.
/// * [`APIError::ChannelUnavailable`] if the next-hop channel is not available for updates
/// (including due to previous monitor update failure or new permanent monitor update
fn send_payment_internal(&self, route: &Route, payment_hash: PaymentHash, payment_secret: &Option<PaymentSecret>, keysend_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>, payment_id: PaymentId, recv_value_msat: Option<u64>, onion_session_privs: Vec<[u8; 32]>) -> Result<(), PaymentSendFailure> {
if route.paths.len() < 1 {
- return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::RouteError{err: "There must be at least one path to send over"}));
+ return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::InvalidRoute{err: "There must be at least one path to send over"}));
}
if payment_secret.is_none() && route.paths.len() > 1 {
return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError{err: "Payment secret is required for multi-path payments".to_string()}));
let mut path_errs = Vec::with_capacity(route.paths.len());
'path_check: for path in route.paths.iter() {
if path.len() < 1 || path.len() > 20 {
- path_errs.push(Err(APIError::RouteError{err: "Path didn't go anywhere/had bogus size"}));
+ path_errs.push(Err(APIError::InvalidRoute{err: "Path didn't go anywhere/had bogus size"}));
continue 'path_check;
}
for (idx, hop) in path.iter().enumerate() {
if idx != path.len() - 1 && hop.pubkey == our_node_id {
- path_errs.push(Err(APIError::RouteError{err: "Path went through us but wasn't a simple rebalance loop to us"}));
+ path_errs.push(Err(APIError::InvalidRoute{err: "Path went through us but wasn't a simple rebalance loop to us"}));
continue 'path_check;
}
}
let next_hop_scid = match self.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get(next_hop_channel_id) {
Some(chan) => {
if !chan.is_usable() {
- return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError {
- err: format!("Channel with id {:?} not fully established", next_hop_channel_id)
+ return Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable {
+ err: format!("Channel with id {} not fully established", log_bytes!(*next_hop_channel_id))
})
}
chan.get_short_channel_id().unwrap_or(chan.outbound_scid_alias())
},
- None => return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError {
- err: format!("Channel with id {:?} not found", next_hop_channel_id)
+ None => return Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable {
+ err: format!("Channel with id {} not found", log_bytes!(*next_hop_channel_id))
})
};
let payment = self.pending_intercepted_htlcs.lock().unwrap().remove(&intercept_id)
.ok_or_else(|| APIError::APIMisuseError {
- err: format!("Payment with intercept id {:?} not found", intercept_id.0)
+ err: format!("Payment with intercept id {} not found", log_bytes!(intercept_id.0))
})?;
let routing = match payment.forward_info.routing {
let payment = self.pending_intercepted_htlcs.lock().unwrap().remove(&intercept_id)
.ok_or_else(|| APIError::APIMisuseError {
- err: format!("Payment with InterceptId {:?} not found", intercept_id)
+ err: format!("Payment with intercept id {} not found", log_bytes!(intercept_id.0))
})?;
if let PendingHTLCRouting::Forward { short_channel_id, .. } = payment.forward_info.routing {
macro_rules! fail_htlc {
($htlc: expr, $payment_hash: expr) => {
- let mut htlc_msat_height_data = byte_utils::be64_to_array($htlc.value).to_vec();
+ let mut htlc_msat_height_data = $htlc.value.to_be_bytes().to_vec();
htlc_msat_height_data.extend_from_slice(
- &byte_utils::be32_to_array(self.best_block.read().unwrap().height()),
+ &self.best_block.read().unwrap().height().to_be_bytes(),
);
failed_forwards.push((HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData {
short_channel_id: $htlc.prev_hop.short_channel_id,
macro_rules! check_total_value {
($payment_data: expr, $payment_preimage: expr) => {{
- let mut payment_received_generated = false;
+ let mut payment_claimable_generated = false;
let purpose = || {
events::PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment {
payment_preimage: $payment_preimage,
} else if total_value == $payment_data.total_msat {
let prev_channel_id = prev_funding_outpoint.to_channel_id();
htlcs.push(claimable_htlc);
- new_events.push(events::Event::PaymentReceived {
+ new_events.push(events::Event::PaymentClaimable {
receiver_node_id: Some(receiver_node_id),
payment_hash,
purpose: purpose(),
via_channel_id: Some(prev_channel_id),
via_user_channel_id: Some(prev_user_channel_id),
});
- payment_received_generated = true;
+ payment_claimable_generated = true;
} else {
// Nothing to do - we haven't reached the total
// payment value yet, wait until we receive more
// MPP parts.
htlcs.push(claimable_htlc);
}
- payment_received_generated
+ payment_claimable_generated
}}
}
let purpose = events::PaymentPurpose::SpontaneousPayment(preimage);
e.insert((purpose.clone(), vec![claimable_htlc]));
let prev_channel_id = prev_funding_outpoint.to_channel_id();
- new_events.push(events::Event::PaymentReceived {
+ new_events.push(events::Event::PaymentClaimable {
receiver_node_id: Some(receiver_node_id),
payment_hash,
amount_msat: outgoing_amt_msat,
log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), payment_data.total_msat, inbound_payment.get().min_value_msat.unwrap());
fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc, payment_hash);
} else {
- let payment_received_generated = check_total_value!(payment_data, inbound_payment.get().payment_preimage);
- if payment_received_generated {
+ let payment_claimable_generated = check_total_value!(payment_data, inbound_payment.get().payment_preimage);
+ if payment_claimable_generated {
inbound_payment.remove_entry();
}
}
}
/// Indicates that the preimage for payment_hash is unknown or the received amount is incorrect
- /// after a PaymentReceived event, failing the HTLC back to its origin and freeing resources
+ /// after a PaymentClaimable event, failing the HTLC back to its origin and freeing resources
/// along the path (including in our own channel on which we received it).
///
/// Note that in some cases around unclean shutdown, it is possible the payment may have
/// already been claimed by you via [`ChannelManager::claim_funds`] prior to you seeing (a
- /// second copy of) the [`events::Event::PaymentReceived`] event. Alternatively, the payment
+ /// second copy of) the [`events::Event::PaymentClaimable`] event. Alternatively, the payment
/// may have already been failed automatically by LDK if it was nearing its expiration time.
///
/// While LDK will never claim a payment automatically on your behalf (i.e. without you calling
let removed_source = self.claimable_htlcs.lock().unwrap().remove(payment_hash);
if let Some((_, mut sources)) = removed_source {
for htlc in sources.drain(..) {
- let mut htlc_msat_height_data = byte_utils::be64_to_array(htlc.value).to_vec();
- htlc_msat_height_data.extend_from_slice(&byte_utils::be32_to_array(
- self.best_block.read().unwrap().height()));
+ let mut htlc_msat_height_data = htlc.value.to_be_bytes().to_vec();
+ htlc_msat_height_data.extend_from_slice(&self.best_block.read().unwrap().height().to_be_bytes());
let source = HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(htlc.prev_hop);
let reason = HTLCFailReason::reason(0x4000 | 15, htlc_msat_height_data);
let receiver = HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: *payment_hash };
}
}
- /// Provides a payment preimage in response to [`Event::PaymentReceived`], generating any
+ /// Provides a payment preimage in response to [`Event::PaymentClaimable`], generating any
/// [`MessageSendEvent`]s needed to claim the payment.
///
/// Note that calling this method does *not* guarantee that the payment has been claimed. You
/// provided to your [`EventHandler`] when [`process_pending_events`] is next called.
///
/// Note that if you did not set an `amount_msat` when calling [`create_inbound_payment`] or
- /// [`create_inbound_payment_for_hash`] you must check that the amount in the `PaymentReceived`
+ /// [`create_inbound_payment_for_hash`] you must check that the amount in the `PaymentClaimable`
/// event matches your expectation. If you fail to do so and call this method, you may provide
/// the sender "proof-of-payment" when they did not fulfill the full expected payment.
///
- /// [`Event::PaymentReceived`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentReceived
+ /// [`Event::PaymentClaimable`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentClaimable
/// [`Event::PaymentClaimed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentClaimed
/// [`process_pending_events`]: EventsProvider::process_pending_events
/// [`create_inbound_payment`]: Self::create_inbound_payment
mem::drop(channel_state_lock);
if !valid_mpp {
for htlc in sources.drain(..) {
- let mut htlc_msat_height_data = byte_utils::be64_to_array(htlc.value).to_vec();
- htlc_msat_height_data.extend_from_slice(&byte_utils::be32_to_array(
- self.best_block.read().unwrap().height()));
+ let mut htlc_msat_height_data = htlc.value.to_be_bytes().to_vec();
+ htlc_msat_height_data.extend_from_slice(&self.best_block.read().unwrap().height().to_be_bytes());
let source = HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(htlc.prev_hop);
let reason = HTLCFailReason::reason(0x4000 | 15, htlc_msat_height_data);
let receiver = HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash };
if chan.get().get_counterparty_node_id() != *counterparty_node_id {
return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::send_err_msg_no_close("Got a message for a channel from the wrong node!".to_owned(), msg.temporary_channel_id));
}
- (try_chan_entry!(self, chan.get_mut().funding_created(msg, best_block, &self.logger), chan), chan.remove())
+ (try_chan_entry!(self, chan.get_mut().funding_created(msg, best_block, &self.keys_manager, &self.logger), chan), chan.remove())
},
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(_) => return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::send_err_msg_no_close("Failed to find corresponding channel".to_owned(), msg.temporary_channel_id))
}
if chan.get().get_counterparty_node_id() != *counterparty_node_id {
return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::send_err_msg_no_close("Got a message for a channel from the wrong node!".to_owned(), msg.channel_id));
}
- let (monitor, funding_tx, channel_ready) = match chan.get_mut().funding_signed(&msg, best_block, &self.logger) {
+ let (monitor, funding_tx, channel_ready) = match chan.get_mut().funding_signed(&msg, best_block, &self.keys_manager, &self.logger) {
Ok(update) => update,
Err(e) => try_chan_entry!(self, Err(e), chan),
};
/// This differs from [`create_inbound_payment_for_hash`] only in that it generates the
/// [`PaymentHash`] and [`PaymentPreimage`] for you.
///
- /// The [`PaymentPreimage`] will ultimately be returned to you in the [`PaymentReceived`], which
- /// will have the [`PaymentReceived::payment_preimage`] field filled in. That should then be
+ /// The [`PaymentPreimage`] will ultimately be returned to you in the [`PaymentClaimable`], which
+ /// will have the [`PaymentClaimable::payment_preimage`] field filled in. That should then be
/// passed directly to [`claim_funds`].
///
/// See [`create_inbound_payment_for_hash`] for detailed documentation on behavior and requirements.
/// Errors if `min_value_msat` is greater than total bitcoin supply.
///
/// [`claim_funds`]: Self::claim_funds
- /// [`PaymentReceived`]: events::Event::PaymentReceived
- /// [`PaymentReceived::payment_preimage`]: events::Event::PaymentReceived::payment_preimage
+ /// [`PaymentClaimable`]: events::Event::PaymentClaimable
+ /// [`PaymentClaimable::payment_preimage`]: events::Event::PaymentClaimable::payment_preimage
/// [`create_inbound_payment_for_hash`]: Self::create_inbound_payment_for_hash
pub fn create_inbound_payment(&self, min_value_msat: Option<u64>, invoice_expiry_delta_secs: u32) -> Result<(PaymentHash, PaymentSecret), ()> {
inbound_payment::create(&self.inbound_payment_key, min_value_msat, invoice_expiry_delta_secs, &self.keys_manager, self.highest_seen_timestamp.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u64)
/// Gets a [`PaymentSecret`] for a given [`PaymentHash`], for which the payment preimage is
/// stored external to LDK.
///
- /// A [`PaymentReceived`] event will only be generated if the [`PaymentSecret`] matches a
+ /// A [`PaymentClaimable`] event will only be generated if the [`PaymentSecret`] matches a
/// payment secret fetched via this method or [`create_inbound_payment`], and which is at least
/// the `min_value_msat` provided here, if one is provided.
///
///
/// `min_value_msat` should be set if the invoice being generated contains a value. Any payment
/// received for the returned [`PaymentHash`] will be required to be at least `min_value_msat`
- /// before a [`PaymentReceived`] event will be generated, ensuring that we do not provide the
+ /// before a [`PaymentClaimable`] event will be generated, ensuring that we do not provide the
/// sender "proof-of-payment" unless they have paid the required amount.
///
/// `invoice_expiry_delta_secs` describes the number of seconds that the invoice is valid for
///
/// Note that we use block header time to time-out pending inbound payments (with some margin
/// to compensate for the inaccuracy of block header timestamps). Thus, in practice we will
- /// accept a payment and generate a [`PaymentReceived`] event for some time after the expiry.
+ /// accept a payment and generate a [`PaymentClaimable`] event for some time after the expiry.
/// If you need exact expiry semantics, you should enforce them upon receipt of
- /// [`PaymentReceived`].
+ /// [`PaymentClaimable`].
///
/// Note that invoices generated for inbound payments should have their `min_final_cltv_expiry`
/// set to at least [`MIN_FINAL_CLTV_EXPIRY`].
/// Errors if `min_value_msat` is greater than total bitcoin supply.
///
/// [`create_inbound_payment`]: Self::create_inbound_payment
- /// [`PaymentReceived`]: events::Event::PaymentReceived
+ /// [`PaymentClaimable`]: events::Event::PaymentClaimable
pub fn create_inbound_payment_for_hash(&self, payment_hash: PaymentHash, min_value_msat: Option<u64>, invoice_expiry_delta_secs: u32) -> Result<PaymentSecret, ()> {
inbound_payment::create_from_hash(&self.inbound_payment_key, min_value_msat, payment_hash, invoice_expiry_delta_secs, self.highest_seen_timestamp.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u64)
}
let mut inflight_htlcs = InFlightHtlcs::new();
for chan in self.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.values() {
- for htlc_source in chan.inflight_htlc_sources() {
+ for (htlc_source, _) in chan.inflight_htlc_sources() {
if let HTLCSource::OutboundRoute { path, .. } = htlc_source {
inflight_htlcs.process_path(path, self.get_our_node_id());
}
events.into_inner()
}
+ #[cfg(test)]
+ pub fn pop_pending_event(&self) -> Option<events::Event> {
+ let mut events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
+ if events.is_empty() { None } else { Some(events.remove(0)) }
+ }
+
#[cfg(test)]
pub fn has_pending_payments(&self) -> bool {
!self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap().is_empty()
// number of blocks we generally consider it to take to do a commitment update,
// just give up on it and fail the HTLC.
if height >= htlc.cltv_expiry - HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER {
- let mut htlc_msat_height_data = byte_utils::be64_to_array(htlc.value).to_vec();
- htlc_msat_height_data.extend_from_slice(&byte_utils::be32_to_array(height));
+ let mut htlc_msat_height_data = htlc.value.to_be_bytes().to_vec();
+ htlc_msat_height_data.extend_from_slice(&height.to_be_bytes());
timed_out_htlcs.push((HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(htlc.prev_hop.clone()), payment_hash.clone(),
HTLCFailReason::reason(0x4000 | 15, htlc_msat_height_data),
user_channel_id: channel.get_user_id(),
reason: ClosureReason::OutdatedChannelManager
});
+ for (channel_htlc_source, payment_hash) in channel.inflight_htlc_sources() {
+ let mut found_htlc = false;
+ for (monitor_htlc_source, _) in monitor.get_all_current_outbound_htlcs() {
+ if *channel_htlc_source == monitor_htlc_source { found_htlc = true; break; }
+ }
+ if !found_htlc {
+ // If we have some HTLCs in the channel which are not present in the newer
+ // ChannelMonitor, they have been removed and should be failed back to
+ // ensure we don't forget them entirely. Note that if the missing HTLC(s)
+ // were actually claimed we'd have generated and ensured the previous-hop
+ // claim update ChannelMonitor updates were persisted prior to persising
+ // the ChannelMonitor update for the forward leg, so attempting to fail the
+ // backwards leg of the HTLC will simply be rejected.
+ log_info!(args.logger,
+ "Failing HTLC with hash {} as it is missing in the ChannelMonitor for channel {} but was present in the (stale) ChannelManager",
+ log_bytes!(channel.channel_id()), log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
+ failed_htlcs.push((channel_htlc_source.clone(), *payment_hash, channel.get_counterparty_node_id(), channel.channel_id()));
+ }
+ }
} else {
log_info!(args.logger, "Successfully loaded channel {}", log_bytes!(channel.channel_id()));
if let Some(short_channel_id) = channel.get_short_channel_id() {
None => continue,
}
}
- if forward_htlcs_count > 0 {
- // If we have pending HTLCs to forward, assume we either dropped a
- // `PendingHTLCsForwardable` or the user received it but never processed it as they
- // shut down before the timer hit. Either way, set the time_forwardable to a small
- // constant as enough time has likely passed that we should simply handle the forwards
- // now, or at least after the user gets a chance to reconnect to our peers.
- pending_events_read.push(events::Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable {
- time_forwardable: Duration::from_secs(2),
- });
- }
let background_event_count: u64 = Readable::read(reader)?;
let mut pending_background_events_read: Vec<BackgroundEvent> = Vec::with_capacity(cmp::min(background_event_count as usize, MAX_ALLOC_SIZE/mem::size_of::<BackgroundEvent>()));
}
}
}
+ for (htlc_source, htlc) in monitor.get_all_current_outbound_htlcs() {
+ if let HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(prev_hop_data) = htlc_source {
+ // The ChannelMonitor is now responsible for this HTLC's
+ // failure/success and will let us know what its outcome is. If we
+ // still have an entry for this HTLC in `forward_htlcs`, we were
+ // apparently not persisted after the monitor was when forwarding
+ // the payment.
+ forward_htlcs.retain(|_, forwards| {
+ forwards.retain(|forward| {
+ if let HTLCForwardInfo::AddHTLC(htlc_info) = forward {
+ if htlc_info.prev_short_channel_id == prev_hop_data.short_channel_id &&
+ htlc_info.prev_htlc_id == prev_hop_data.htlc_id
+ {
+ log_info!(args.logger, "Removing pending to-forward HTLC with hash {} as it was forwarded to the closed channel {}",
+ log_bytes!(htlc.payment_hash.0), log_bytes!(monitor.get_funding_txo().0.to_channel_id()));
+ false
+ } else { true }
+ } else { true }
+ });
+ !forwards.is_empty()
+ })
+ }
+ }
}
}
}
+ if !forward_htlcs.is_empty() {
+ // If we have pending HTLCs to forward, assume we either dropped a
+ // `PendingHTLCsForwardable` or the user received it but never processed it as they
+ // shut down before the timer hit. Either way, set the time_forwardable to a small
+ // constant as enough time has likely passed that we should simply handle the forwards
+ // now, or at least after the user gets a chance to reconnect to our peers.
+ pending_events_read.push(events::Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable {
+ time_forwardable: Duration::from_secs(2),
+ });
+ }
+
let inbound_pmt_key_material = args.keys_manager.get_inbound_payment_key_material();
let expanded_inbound_key = inbound_payment::ExpandedKey::new(&inbound_pmt_key_material);
$node_b.handle_revoke_and_ack(&$node_a.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_a }, MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, $node_b.get_our_node_id()));
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_b });
- expect_payment_received!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_b }, payment_hash, payment_secret, 10_000);
+ expect_payment_claimable!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_b }, payment_hash, payment_secret, 10_000);
$node_b.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
expect_payment_claimed!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_b }, payment_hash, 10_000);
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff