Merge pull request #2133 from tnull/2023-03-pin-syn
[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / ln / functional_test_utils.rs
index 458d303fc101cd2af99564896ba3b9e91212b486..0221b1187c6937a7c618d59c695f39c817849e18 100644 (file)
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 use crate::chain::{BestBlock, ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, Confirm, Listen, Watch, keysinterface::EntropySource};
 use crate::chain::channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor;
 use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
+use crate::events::{ClosureReason, Event, HTLCDestination, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PathFailure, PaymentPurpose};
 use crate::ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash, PaymentSecret};
 use crate::ln::channelmanager::{ChainParameters, ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, PaymentId, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
 use crate::routing::gossip::{P2PGossipSync, NetworkGraph, NetworkUpdate};
@@ -24,7 +25,6 @@ use crate::util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingSigner;
 use crate::util::scid_utils;
 use crate::util::test_utils;
 use crate::util::test_utils::{panicking, TestChainMonitor, TestScorer, TestKeysInterface};
-use crate::util::events::{Event, HTLCDestination, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PathFailure, PaymentPurpose};
 use crate::util::errors::APIError;
 use crate::util::config::UserConfig;
 use crate::util::ser::{ReadableArgs, Writeable};
@@ -62,9 +62,12 @@ pub fn confirm_transaction<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, tx: &Tran
        scid
 }
 /// Mine a single block containing the given transaction
-pub fn mine_transaction<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, tx: &Transaction) {
+///
+/// Returns the SCID a channel confirmed in the given transaction will have, assuming the funding
+/// output is the 1st output in the transaction.
+pub fn mine_transaction<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, tx: &Transaction) -> u64 {
        let height = node.best_block_info().1 + 1;
-       confirm_transaction_at(node, tx, height);
+       confirm_transaction_at(node, tx, height)
 }
 /// Mine a single block containing the given transactions
 pub fn mine_transactions<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, txn: &[&Transaction]) {
@@ -696,7 +699,7 @@ macro_rules! get_feerate {
                        let mut per_peer_state_lock;
                        let mut peer_state_lock;
                        let chan = get_channel_ref!($node, $counterparty_node, per_peer_state_lock, peer_state_lock, $channel_id);
-                       chan.get_feerate()
+                       chan.get_feerate_sat_per_1000_weight()
                }
        }
 }
@@ -1097,6 +1100,10 @@ pub fn create_unannounced_chan_between_nodes_with_value<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(nodes: &
        nodes[a].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[b].node.get_our_node_id(), &cs_funding_signed);
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[a], 1);
 
+       assert_eq!(nodes[a].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 1);
+       assert_eq!(nodes[a].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap()[0], tx);
+       nodes[a].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clear();
+
        let conf_height = core::cmp::max(nodes[a].best_block_info().1 + 1, nodes[b].best_block_info().1 + 1);
        confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[a], &tx, conf_height);
        connect_blocks(&nodes[a], CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH - 1);
@@ -1149,6 +1156,24 @@ pub fn update_nodes_with_chan_announce<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(nodes: &'a Vec<Node<'b, '
        }
 }
 
+pub fn do_check_spends<F: Fn(&bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::OutPoint) -> Option<TxOut>>(tx: &Transaction, get_output: F) {
+       for outp in tx.output.iter() {
+               assert!(outp.value >= outp.script_pubkey.dust_value().to_sat(), "Spending tx output didn't meet dust limit");
+       }
+       let mut total_value_in = 0;
+       for input in tx.input.iter() {
+               total_value_in += get_output(&input.previous_output).unwrap().value;
+       }
+       let mut total_value_out = 0;
+       for output in tx.output.iter() {
+               total_value_out += output.value;
+       }
+       let min_fee = (tx.weight() as u64 + 3) / 4; // One sat per vbyte (ie per weight/4, rounded up)
+       // Input amount - output amount = fee, so check that out + min_fee is smaller than input
+       assert!(total_value_out + min_fee <= total_value_in);
+       tx.verify(get_output).unwrap();
+}
+
 #[macro_export]
 macro_rules! check_spends {
        ($tx: expr, $($spends_txn: expr),*) => {
@@ -1158,9 +1183,6 @@ macro_rules! check_spends {
                                assert!(outp.value >= outp.script_pubkey.dust_value().to_sat(), "Input tx output didn't meet dust limit");
                        }
                        )*
-                       for outp in $tx.output.iter() {
-                               assert!(outp.value >= outp.script_pubkey.dust_value().to_sat(), "Spending tx output didn't meet dust limit");
-                       }
                        let get_output = |out_point: &bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::OutPoint| {
                                $(
                                        if out_point.txid == $spends_txn.txid() {
@@ -1169,18 +1191,7 @@ macro_rules! check_spends {
                                )*
                                None
                        };
-                       let mut total_value_in = 0;
-                       for input in $tx.input.iter() {
-                               total_value_in += get_output(&input.previous_output).unwrap().value;
-                       }
-                       let mut total_value_out = 0;
-                       for output in $tx.output.iter() {
-                               total_value_out += output.value;
-                       }
-                       let min_fee = ($tx.weight() as u64 + 3) / 4; // One sat per vbyte (ie per weight/4, rounded up)
-                       // Input amount - output amount = fee, so check that out + min_fee is smaller than input
-                       assert!(total_value_out + min_fee <= total_value_in);
-                       $tx.verify(get_output).unwrap();
+                       $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::do_check_spends(&$tx, get_output);
                }
        }
 }
@@ -1227,58 +1238,66 @@ macro_rules! check_warn_msg {
 
 /// Check that a channel's closing channel update has been broadcasted, and optionally
 /// check whether an error message event has occurred.
-#[macro_export]
-macro_rules! check_closed_broadcast {
-       ($node: expr, $with_error_msg: expr) => {{
-               use $crate::util::events::MessageSendEvent;
-               use $crate::ln::msgs::ErrorAction;
-
-               let msg_events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
-               assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), if $with_error_msg { 2 } else { 1 });
-               match msg_events[0] {
+pub fn check_closed_broadcast(node: &Node, num_channels: usize, with_error_msg: bool) -> Vec<msgs::ErrorMessage> {
+       let msg_events = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+       assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), if with_error_msg { num_channels * 2 } else { num_channels });
+       msg_events.into_iter().filter_map(|msg_event| {
+               match msg_event {
                        MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
                                assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & 2, 2);
+                               None
+                       },
+                       MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => {
+                               assert!(with_error_msg);
+                               // TODO: Check node_id
+                               Some(msg.clone())
                        },
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
                }
-               if $with_error_msg {
-                       match msg_events[1] {
-                               MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => {
-                                       // TODO: Check node_id
-                                       Some(msg.clone())
-                               },
-                               _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+       }).collect()
+}
+
+/// Check that a channel's closing channel update has been broadcasted, and optionally
+/// check whether an error message event has occurred.
+///
+/// Don't use this, use the identically-named function instead.
+#[macro_export]
+macro_rules! check_closed_broadcast {
+       ($node: expr, $with_error_msg: expr) => {
+               $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::check_closed_broadcast(&$node, 1, $with_error_msg).pop()
+       }
+}
+
+/// Check that a channel's closing channel events has been issued
+pub fn check_closed_event(node: &Node, events_count: usize, expected_reason: ClosureReason, is_check_discard_funding: bool) {
+       let events = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+       assert_eq!(events.len(), events_count, "{:?}", events);
+       let mut issues_discard_funding = false;
+       for event in events {
+               match event {
+                       Event::ChannelClosed { ref reason, .. } => {
+                               assert_eq!(*reason, expected_reason);
+                       },
+                       Event::DiscardFunding { .. } => {
+                               issues_discard_funding = true;
                        }
-               } else { None }
-       }}
+                       _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+               }
+       }
+       assert_eq!(is_check_discard_funding, issues_discard_funding);
 }
 
 /// Check that a channel's closing channel events has been issued
+///
+/// Don't use this, use the identically-named function instead.
 #[macro_export]
 macro_rules! check_closed_event {
        ($node: expr, $events: expr, $reason: expr) => {
                check_closed_event!($node, $events, $reason, false);
        };
-       ($node: expr, $events: expr, $reason: expr, $is_check_discard_funding: expr) => {{
-               use $crate::util::events::Event;
-
-               let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
-               assert_eq!(events.len(), $events, "{:?}", events);
-               let expected_reason = $reason;
-               let mut issues_discard_funding = false;
-               for event in events {
-                       match event {
-                               Event::ChannelClosed { ref reason, .. } => {
-                                       assert_eq!(*reason, expected_reason);
-                               },
-                               Event::DiscardFunding { .. } => {
-                                       issues_discard_funding = true;
-                               }
-                               _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
-                       }
-               }
-               assert_eq!($is_check_discard_funding, issues_discard_funding);
-       }}
+       ($node: expr, $events: expr, $reason: expr, $is_check_discard_funding: expr) => {
+               $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::check_closed_event(&$node, $events, $reason, $is_check_discard_funding);
+       }
 }
 
 pub fn close_channel<'a, 'b, 'c>(outbound_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, inbound_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, channel_id: &[u8; 32], funding_tx: Transaction, close_inbound_first: bool) -> (msgs::ChannelUpdate, msgs::ChannelUpdate, Transaction) {
@@ -1380,22 +1399,11 @@ impl SendEvent {
 }
 
 #[macro_export]
+/// Don't use this, use the identically-named function instead.
 macro_rules! expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions {
-       ($node: expr, $expected_failures: expr) => {{
-               let expected_failures = $expected_failures;
-               let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
-               match events[0] {
-                       $crate::util::events::Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
-                       _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events),
-               };
-
-               let count = expected_failures.len() + 1;
-               assert_eq!(events.len(), count);
-
-               if expected_failures.len() > 0 {
-                       expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!(events, expected_failures)
-               }
-       }}
+       ($node: expr, $expected_failures: expr) => {
+               $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions($node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), &$expected_failures);
+       }
 }
 
 #[macro_export]
@@ -1403,8 +1411,8 @@ macro_rules! expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations {
        ($events: expr, $expected_failures: expr) => {{
                for event in $events {
                        match event {
-                               $crate::util::events::Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
-                               $crate::util::events::Event::HTLCHandlingFailed { ref failed_next_destination, .. } => {
+                               $crate::events::Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
+                               $crate::events::Event::HTLCHandlingFailed { ref failed_next_destination, .. } => {
                                        assert!($expected_failures.contains(&failed_next_destination))
                                },
                                _ => panic!("Unexpected destination"),
@@ -1413,27 +1421,49 @@ macro_rules! expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations {
        }}
 }
 
+/// Checks that an [`Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable`] is available in the given events and, if
+/// there are any [`Event::HTLCHandlingFailed`] events their [`HTLCDestination`] is included in the
+/// `expected_failures` set.
+pub fn expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions(events: Vec<Event>, expected_failures: &[HTLCDestination]) {
+       match events[0] {
+               Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
+               _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events),
+       };
+
+       let count = expected_failures.len() + 1;
+       assert_eq!(events.len(), count);
+
+       if expected_failures.len() > 0 {
+               expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!(events, expected_failures)
+       }
+}
+
 #[macro_export]
 /// Clears (and ignores) a PendingHTLCsForwardable event
+///
+/// Don't use this, call [`expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions()`] with an empty failure
+/// set instead.
 macro_rules! expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore {
-       ($node: expr) => {{
-               expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions!($node, vec![]);
-       }};
+       ($node: expr) => {
+               $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions($node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), &[]);
+       }
 }
 
 #[macro_export]
 /// Clears (and ignores) PendingHTLCsForwardable and HTLCHandlingFailed events
+///
+/// Don't use this, call [`expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions()`] instead.
 macro_rules! expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore {
-       ($node: expr, $expected_failures: expr) => {{
-               expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions!($node, $expected_failures);
-       }};
+       ($node: expr, $expected_failures: expr) => {
+               $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions($node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), &$expected_failures);
+       }
 }
 
 #[macro_export]
 /// Handles a PendingHTLCsForwardable event
 macro_rules! expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable {
        ($node: expr) => {{
-               expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!($node);
+               $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions($node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), &[]);
                $node.node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
 
                // Ensure process_pending_htlc_forwards is idempotent.
@@ -1445,7 +1475,7 @@ macro_rules! expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable {
 /// Handles a PendingHTLCsForwardable and HTLCHandlingFailed event
 macro_rules! expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed {
        ($node: expr, $expected_failures: expr) => {{
-               expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!($node, $expected_failures);
+               $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions($node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), &$expected_failures);
                $node.node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
 
                // Ensure process_pending_htlc_forwards is idempotent.
@@ -1548,7 +1578,7 @@ pub fn do_commitment_signed_dance(node_a: &Node<'_, '_, '_>, node_b: &Node<'_, '
 
        if fail_backwards {
                expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(node_a,
-                       vec![crate::util::events::HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel{ node_id: Some(node_b.node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: commitment_signed.channel_id }]);
+                       vec![crate::events::HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel{ node_id: Some(node_b.node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: commitment_signed.channel_id }]);
                check_added_monitors!(node_a, 1);
 
                let node_a_per_peer_state = node_a.node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
@@ -1644,12 +1674,12 @@ macro_rules! expect_payment_claimable {
                let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
                assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
                match events[0] {
-                       $crate::util::events::Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id: _, via_user_channel_id: _ } => {
+                       $crate::events::Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id: _, via_user_channel_id: _ } => {
                                assert_eq!($expected_payment_hash, *payment_hash);
                                assert_eq!($expected_recv_value, amount_msat);
                                assert_eq!($expected_receiver_node_id, receiver_node_id.unwrap());
                                match purpose {
-                                       $crate::util::events::PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+                                       $crate::events::PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
                                                assert_eq!(&$expected_payment_preimage, payment_preimage);
                                                assert_eq!($expected_payment_secret, *payment_secret);
                                        },
@@ -1668,7 +1698,7 @@ macro_rules! expect_payment_claimed {
                let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
                assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
                match events[0] {
-                       $crate::util::events::Event::PaymentClaimed { ref payment_hash, amount_msat, .. } => {
+                       $crate::events::Event::PaymentClaimed { ref payment_hash, amount_msat, .. } => {
                                assert_eq!($expected_payment_hash, *payment_hash);
                                assert_eq!($expected_recv_value, amount_msat);
                        },
@@ -1707,7 +1737,7 @@ macro_rules! expect_payment_sent {
                        assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
                }
                let expected_payment_id = match events[0] {
-                       $crate::util::events::Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_id, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, ref fee_paid_msat } => {
+                       $crate::events::Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_id, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, ref fee_paid_msat } => {
                                assert_eq!($expected_payment_preimage, *payment_preimage);
                                assert_eq!(expected_payment_hash, *payment_hash);
                                assert!(fee_paid_msat.is_some());
@@ -1721,7 +1751,7 @@ macro_rules! expect_payment_sent {
                if $expect_paths {
                        for i in 1..events.len() {
                                match events[i] {
-                                       $crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { payment_id, payment_hash, .. } => {
+                                       $crate::events::Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { payment_id, payment_hash, .. } => {
                                                assert_eq!(payment_id, expected_payment_id);
                                                assert_eq!(payment_hash, Some(expected_payment_hash));
                                        },
@@ -1739,7 +1769,7 @@ macro_rules! expect_payment_path_successful {
                let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
                assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
                match events[0] {
-                       $crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {},
+                       $crate::events::Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {},
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
                }
        }
@@ -1773,7 +1803,7 @@ pub fn expect_channel_ready_event<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, ex
        let events = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
        assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
        match events[0] {
-               crate::util::events::Event::ChannelReady{ ref counterparty_node_id, .. } => {
+               crate::events::Event::ChannelReady{ ref counterparty_node_id, .. } => {
                        assert_eq!(*expected_counterparty_node_id, *counterparty_node_id);
                },
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
@@ -1843,20 +1873,13 @@ pub fn expect_payment_failed_conditions_event<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd, 'e>(
 ) {
        if conditions.expected_mpp_parts_remain { assert_eq!(payment_failed_events.len(), 1); } else { assert_eq!(payment_failed_events.len(), 2); }
        let expected_payment_id = match &payment_failed_events[0] {
-               Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, path, retry, payment_id, failure, short_channel_id,
+               Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, payment_id, failure,
                        #[cfg(test)]
                        error_code,
                        #[cfg(test)]
                        error_data, .. } => {
                        assert_eq!(*payment_hash, expected_payment_hash, "unexpected payment_hash");
                        assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, expected_payment_failed_permanently, "unexpected payment_failed_permanently value");
-                       assert!(retry.is_some(), "expected retry.is_some()");
-                       assert_eq!(retry.as_ref().unwrap().final_value_msat, path.last().unwrap().fee_msat, "Retry amount should match last hop in path");
-                       assert_eq!(retry.as_ref().unwrap().payment_params.payee_pubkey, path.last().unwrap().pubkey, "Retry payee node_id should match last hop in path");
-                       if let Some(scid) = short_channel_id {
-                               assert!(retry.as_ref().unwrap().payment_params.previously_failed_channels.contains(&scid));
-                       }
-
                        #[cfg(test)]
                        {
                                assert!(error_code.is_some(), "expected error_code.is_some() = true");