/// `release_commitment_secret` are affected by this setting.
#[cfg(test)]
pub fn set_channel_signer_available(&self, peer_id: &PublicKey, chan_id: &ChannelId, available: bool) {
+ use crate::sign::ChannelSigner;
+ log_debug!(self.logger, "Setting channel signer for {} as available={}", chan_id, available);
+
let per_peer_state = self.node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(peer_id).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
- let signer = (|| {
- match chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(chan_id) {
- Some(phase) => phase.context().get_signer(),
- None => panic!("Couldn't find a channel with id {}", chan_id),
+
+ let mut channel_keys_id = None;
+ if let Some(chan) = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(chan_id).map(|phase| phase.context()) {
+ chan.get_signer().as_ecdsa().unwrap().set_available(available);
+ channel_keys_id = Some(chan.channel_keys_id);
+ }
+
+ let mut monitor = None;
+ for (funding_txo, channel_id) in self.chain_monitor.chain_monitor.list_monitors() {
+ if *chan_id == channel_id {
+ monitor = self.chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_txo).ok();
}
- })();
- log_debug!(self.logger, "Setting channel signer for {} as available={}", chan_id, available);
- signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().set_available(available);
+ }
+ if let Some(monitor) = monitor {
+ monitor.do_signer_call(|signer| {
+ channel_keys_id = channel_keys_id.or(Some(signer.inner.channel_keys_id()));
+ signer.set_available(available)
+ });
+ }
+
+ if available {
+ self.keys_manager.unavailable_signers.lock().unwrap()
+ .remove(channel_keys_id.as_ref().unwrap());
+ } else {
+ self.keys_manager.unavailable_signers.lock().unwrap()
+ .insert(channel_keys_id.unwrap());
+ }
}
}
// Before using all the new monitors to check the watch outpoints, use the full set of
// them to ensure we can write and reload our ChannelManager.
{
- let mut channel_monitors = HashMap::new();
+ let mut channel_monitors = new_hash_map();
for monitor in deserialized_monitors.iter_mut() {
channel_monitors.insert(monitor.get_funding_txo().0, monitor);
}
let mut node_read = &chanman_encoded[..];
let (_, node_deserialized) = {
- let mut channel_monitors = HashMap::new();
+ let mut channel_monitors = new_hash_map();
for monitor in monitors_read.iter_mut() {
assert!(channel_monitors.insert(monitor.get_funding_txo().0, monitor).is_none());
}
};
let accept_channel = get_event_msg!(receiver, MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, initiator.node.get_our_node_id());
- assert_eq!(accept_channel.minimum_depth, 0);
+ assert_eq!(accept_channel.common_fields.minimum_depth, 0);
initiator.node.handle_accept_channel(&receiver.node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel);
let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&initiator, &receiver.node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 42);
pub fn exchange_open_accept_chan<'a, 'b, 'c>(node_a: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, node_b: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, channel_value: u64, push_msat: u64) -> ChannelId {
let create_chan_id = node_a.node.create_channel(node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value, push_msat, 42, None, None).unwrap();
let open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(node_a, MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, node_b.node.get_our_node_id());
- assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
+ assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.common_fields.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
node_b.node.handle_open_channel(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
if node_b.node.get_current_default_configuration().manually_accept_inbound_channels {
};
}
let accept_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(node_b, MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, node_a.node.get_our_node_id());
- assert_eq!(accept_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
+ assert_eq!(accept_channel_msg.common_fields.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
node_a.node.handle_accept_channel(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel_msg);
assert_ne!(node_b.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 0);
/// there are any [`Event::HTLCHandlingFailed`] events their [`HTLCDestination`] is included in the
/// `expected_failures` set.
pub fn expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions(events: Vec<Event>, expected_failures: &[HTLCDestination]) {
- match events[0] {
- Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events),
- };
-
let count = expected_failures.len() + 1;
assert_eq!(events.len(), count);
-
+ assert!(events.iter().find(|event| matches!(event, Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. })).is_some());
if expected_failures.len() > 0 {
expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!(events, expected_failures)
}
}
}
+/// Returns the total fee earned by this HTLC forward, in msat.
pub fn expect_payment_forwarded<CM: AChannelManager, H: NodeHolder<CM=CM>>(
event: Event, node: &H, prev_node: &H, next_node: &H, expected_fee: Option<u64>,
- upstream_force_closed: bool, downstream_force_closed: bool
-) {
+ expected_extra_fees_msat: Option<u64>, upstream_force_closed: bool,
+ downstream_force_closed: bool, allow_1_msat_fee_overpay: bool,
+) -> Option<u64> {
match event {
Event::PaymentForwarded {
- fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx, next_channel_id,
- outbound_amount_forwarded_msat: _
+ prev_channel_id, next_channel_id, prev_user_channel_id, next_user_channel_id,
+ total_fee_earned_msat, skimmed_fee_msat, claim_from_onchain_tx, ..
} => {
- assert_eq!(fee_earned_msat, expected_fee);
+ if allow_1_msat_fee_overpay {
+ // Aggregating fees for blinded paths may result in a rounding error, causing slight
+ // overpayment in fees.
+ let actual_fee = total_fee_earned_msat.unwrap();
+ let expected_fee = expected_fee.unwrap();
+ assert!(actual_fee == expected_fee || actual_fee == expected_fee + 1);
+ } else {
+ assert_eq!(total_fee_earned_msat, expected_fee);
+ }
+
+ // Check that the (knowingly) withheld amount is always less or equal to the expected
+ // overpaid amount.
+ assert!(skimmed_fee_msat == expected_extra_fees_msat);
if !upstream_force_closed {
// Is the event prev_channel_id in one of the channels between the two nodes?
- assert!(node.node().list_channels().iter().any(|x| x.counterparty.node_id == prev_node.node().get_our_node_id() && x.channel_id == prev_channel_id.unwrap()));
+ assert!(node.node().list_channels().iter().any(|x|
+ x.counterparty.node_id == prev_node.node().get_our_node_id() &&
+ x.channel_id == prev_channel_id.unwrap() &&
+ x.user_channel_id == prev_user_channel_id.unwrap()
+ ));
}
// We check for force closures since a force closed channel is removed from the
// node's channel list
if !downstream_force_closed {
- assert!(node.node().list_channels().iter().any(|x| x.counterparty.node_id == next_node.node().get_our_node_id() && x.channel_id == next_channel_id.unwrap()));
+ // As documented, `next_user_channel_id` will only be `Some` if we didn't settle via an
+ // onchain transaction, just as the `total_fee_earned_msat` field. Rather than
+ // introducing yet another variable, we use the latter's state as a flag to detect
+ // this and only check if it's `Some`.
+ if total_fee_earned_msat.is_none() {
+ assert!(node.node().list_channels().iter().any(|x|
+ x.counterparty.node_id == next_node.node().get_our_node_id() &&
+ x.channel_id == next_channel_id.unwrap()
+ ));
+ } else {
+ assert!(node.node().list_channels().iter().any(|x|
+ x.counterparty.node_id == next_node.node().get_our_node_id() &&
+ x.channel_id == next_channel_id.unwrap() &&
+ x.user_channel_id == next_user_channel_id.unwrap()
+ ));
+ }
}
assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, downstream_force_closed);
+ total_fee_earned_msat
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
}
+#[macro_export]
macro_rules! expect_payment_forwarded {
($node: expr, $prev_node: expr, $next_node: expr, $expected_fee: expr, $upstream_force_closed: expr, $downstream_force_closed: expr) => {
let mut events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
$crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_payment_forwarded(
- events.pop().unwrap(), &$node, &$prev_node, &$next_node, $expected_fee,
- $upstream_force_closed, $downstream_force_closed);
+ events.pop().unwrap(), &$node, &$prev_node, &$next_node, $expected_fee, None,
+ $upstream_force_closed, $downstream_force_closed, false
+ );
}
}
}
}
-pub fn do_pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_path: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], recv_value: u64, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash, our_payment_secret: Option<PaymentSecret>, ev: MessageSendEvent, payment_claimable_expected: bool, clear_recipient_events: bool, expected_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>, is_probe: bool) -> Option<Event> {
+pub struct PassAlongPathArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> {
+ pub origin_node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>,
+ pub expected_path: &'a [&'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>],
+ pub recv_value: u64,
+ pub payment_hash: PaymentHash,
+ pub payment_secret: Option<PaymentSecret>,
+ pub event: MessageSendEvent,
+ pub payment_claimable_expected: bool,
+ pub clear_recipient_events: bool,
+ pub expected_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>,
+ pub is_probe: bool,
+ pub custom_tlvs: Vec<(u64, Vec<u8>)>,
+}
+
+impl<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> PassAlongPathArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> {
+ pub fn new(
+ origin_node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, expected_path: &'a [&'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>], recv_value: u64,
+ payment_hash: PaymentHash, event: MessageSendEvent,
+ ) -> Self {
+ Self {
+ origin_node, expected_path, recv_value, payment_hash, payment_secret: None, event,
+ payment_claimable_expected: true, clear_recipient_events: true, expected_preimage: None,
+ is_probe: false, custom_tlvs: Vec::new(),
+ }
+ }
+ pub fn without_clearing_recipient_events(mut self) -> Self {
+ self.clear_recipient_events = false;
+ self
+ }
+ pub fn is_probe(mut self) -> Self {
+ self.payment_claimable_expected = false;
+ self.is_probe = true;
+ self
+ }
+ pub fn without_claimable_event(mut self) -> Self {
+ self.payment_claimable_expected = false;
+ self
+ }
+ pub fn with_payment_secret(mut self, payment_secret: PaymentSecret) -> Self {
+ self.payment_secret = Some(payment_secret);
+ self
+ }
+ pub fn with_payment_preimage(mut self, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage) -> Self {
+ self.expected_preimage = Some(payment_preimage);
+ self
+ }
+ pub fn with_custom_tlvs(mut self, custom_tlvs: Vec<(u64, Vec<u8>)>) -> Self {
+ self.custom_tlvs = custom_tlvs;
+ self
+ }
+}
+
+pub fn do_pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(args: PassAlongPathArgs) -> Option<Event> {
+ let PassAlongPathArgs {
+ origin_node, expected_path, recv_value, payment_hash: our_payment_hash,
+ payment_secret: our_payment_secret, event: ev, payment_claimable_expected,
+ clear_recipient_events, expected_preimage, is_probe, custom_tlvs
+ } = args;
+
let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(ev);
let mut prev_node = origin_node;
let mut event = None;
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash, *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(node.node.get_our_node_id(), receiver_node_id.unwrap());
assert!(onion_fields.is_some());
+ assert_eq!(onion_fields.as_ref().unwrap().custom_tlvs, custom_tlvs);
match &purpose {
PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
assert_eq!(expected_preimage, *payment_preimage);
}
pub fn pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_path: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], recv_value: u64, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash, our_payment_secret: Option<PaymentSecret>, ev: MessageSendEvent, payment_claimable_expected: bool, expected_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>) -> Option<Event> {
- do_pass_along_path(origin_node, expected_path, recv_value, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, ev, payment_claimable_expected, true, expected_preimage, false)
+ let mut args = PassAlongPathArgs::new(origin_node, expected_path, recv_value, our_payment_hash, ev);
+ if !payment_claimable_expected {
+ args = args.without_claimable_event();
+ }
+ if let Some(payment_secret) = our_payment_secret {
+ args = args.with_payment_secret(payment_secret);
+ }
+ if let Some(payment_preimage) = expected_preimage {
+ args = args.with_payment_preimage(payment_preimage);
+ }
+ do_pass_along_path(args)
}
pub fn send_probe_along_route<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_route: &[&[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>]]) {
for path in expected_route.iter() {
let ev = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&path[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
- do_pass_along_path(origin_node, path, 0, PaymentHash([0_u8; 32]), None, ev, false, false, None, true);
+ do_pass_along_path(PassAlongPathArgs::new(origin_node, path, 0, PaymentHash([0_u8; 32]), ev)
+ .is_probe()
+ .without_clearing_recipient_events());
+
let nodes_to_fail_payment: Vec<_> = vec![origin_node].into_iter().chain(path.iter().cloned()).collect();
fail_payment_along_path(nodes_to_fail_payment.as_slice());
origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_paths: &[&[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>]], skip_last: bool,
our_payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage
) -> u64 {
- let extra_fees = vec![0; expected_paths.len()];
- do_claim_payment_along_route_with_extra_penultimate_hop_fees(origin_node, expected_paths,
- &extra_fees[..], skip_last, our_payment_preimage)
-}
-
-pub fn do_claim_payment_along_route_with_extra_penultimate_hop_fees<'a, 'b, 'c>(
- origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_paths: &[&[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>]], expected_extra_fees:
- &[u32], skip_last: bool, our_payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage
-) -> u64 {
- assert_eq!(expected_paths.len(), expected_extra_fees.len());
for path in expected_paths.iter() {
assert_eq!(path.last().unwrap().node.get_our_node_id(), expected_paths[0].last().unwrap().node.get_our_node_id());
}
expected_paths[0].last().unwrap().node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
- pass_claimed_payment_along_route(origin_node, expected_paths, expected_extra_fees, skip_last, our_payment_preimage)
+ pass_claimed_payment_along_route(
+ ClaimAlongRouteArgs::new(origin_node, expected_paths, our_payment_preimage)
+ .skip_last(skip_last)
+ )
}
-pub fn pass_claimed_payment_along_route<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_paths: &[&[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>]], expected_extra_fees: &[u32], skip_last: bool, our_payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage) -> u64 {
+pub struct ClaimAlongRouteArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> {
+ pub origin_node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>,
+ pub expected_paths: &'a [&'a [&'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>]],
+ pub expected_extra_fees: Vec<u32>,
+ pub expected_min_htlc_overpay: Vec<u32>,
+ pub skip_last: bool,
+ pub payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage,
+ // Allow forwarding nodes to have taken 1 msat more fee than expected based on the downstream
+ // fulfill amount.
+ //
+ // Necessary because our test utils calculate the expected fee for an intermediate node based on
+ // the amount was claimed in their downstream peer's fulfill, but blinded intermediate nodes
+ // calculate their fee based on the inbound amount from their upstream peer, causing a difference
+ // in rounding.
+ pub allow_1_msat_fee_overpay: bool,
+}
+
+impl<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> ClaimAlongRouteArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> {
+ pub fn new(
+ origin_node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, expected_paths: &'a [&'a [&'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>]],
+ payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage,
+ ) -> Self {
+ Self {
+ origin_node, expected_paths, expected_extra_fees: vec![0; expected_paths.len()],
+ expected_min_htlc_overpay: vec![0; expected_paths.len()], skip_last: false, payment_preimage,
+ allow_1_msat_fee_overpay: false,
+ }
+ }
+ pub fn skip_last(mut self, skip_last: bool) -> Self {
+ self.skip_last = skip_last;
+ self
+ }
+ pub fn with_expected_extra_fees(mut self, extra_fees: Vec<u32>) -> Self {
+ self.expected_extra_fees = extra_fees;
+ self
+ }
+ pub fn with_expected_min_htlc_overpay(mut self, extra_fees: Vec<u32>) -> Self {
+ self.expected_min_htlc_overpay = extra_fees;
+ self
+ }
+ pub fn allow_1_msat_fee_overpay(mut self) -> Self {
+ self.allow_1_msat_fee_overpay = true;
+ self
+ }
+}
+
+pub fn pass_claimed_payment_along_route<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(args: ClaimAlongRouteArgs) -> u64 {
+ let ClaimAlongRouteArgs {
+ origin_node, expected_paths, expected_extra_fees, expected_min_htlc_overpay, skip_last,
+ payment_preimage: our_payment_preimage, allow_1_msat_fee_overpay,
+ } = args;
let claim_event = expected_paths[0].last().unwrap().node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(claim_event.len(), 1);
+ #[allow(unused)]
+ let mut fwd_amt_msat = 0;
match claim_event[0] {
Event::PaymentClaimed {
purpose: PaymentPurpose::SpontaneousPayment(preimage),
assert_eq!(htlcs.len(), expected_paths.len()); // One per path.
assert_eq!(htlcs.iter().map(|h| h.value_msat).sum::<u64>(), amount_msat);
expected_paths.iter().zip(htlcs).for_each(|(path, htlc)| check_claimed_htlc_channel(origin_node, path, htlc));
+ fwd_amt_msat = amount_msat;
},
Event::PaymentClaimed {
purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { .. },
assert_eq!(htlcs.len(), expected_paths.len()); // One per path.
assert_eq!(htlcs.iter().map(|h| h.value_msat).sum::<u64>(), amount_msat);
expected_paths.iter().zip(htlcs).for_each(|(path, htlc)| check_claimed_htlc_channel(origin_node, path, htlc));
+ fwd_amt_msat = amount_msat;
}
_ => panic!(),
}
per_path_msgs.push(msgs_from_ev!(&events[0]));
} else {
for expected_path in expected_paths.iter() {
- // For MPP payments, we always want the message to the first node in the path.
- let ev = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&expected_path[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
+ // For MPP payments, we want the fulfill message from the payee to the penultimate hop in the
+ // path.
+ let penultimate_hop_node_id = expected_path.iter().rev().skip(1).next()
+ .map(|n| n.node.get_our_node_id())
+ .unwrap_or(origin_node.node.get_our_node_id());
+ let ev = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&penultimate_hop_node_id, &mut events);
per_path_msgs.push(msgs_from_ev!(&ev));
}
}
{
$node.node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&$prev_node.node.get_our_node_id(), &next_msgs.as_ref().unwrap().0);
let mut fee = {
- let per_peer_state = $node.node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
- let peer_state = per_peer_state.get(&$prev_node.node.get_our_node_id())
- .unwrap().lock().unwrap();
- let channel = peer_state.channel_by_id.get(&next_msgs.as_ref().unwrap().0.channel_id).unwrap();
- if let Some(prev_config) = channel.context().prev_config() {
- prev_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat
- } else {
- channel.context().config().forwarding_fee_base_msat
- }
+ let (base_fee, prop_fee) = {
+ let per_peer_state = $node.node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
+ let peer_state = per_peer_state.get(&$prev_node.node.get_our_node_id())
+ .unwrap().lock().unwrap();
+ let channel = peer_state.channel_by_id.get(&next_msgs.as_ref().unwrap().0.channel_id).unwrap();
+ if let Some(prev_config) = channel.context().prev_config() {
+ (prev_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat as u64,
+ prev_config.forwarding_fee_proportional_millionths as u64)
+ } else {
+ (channel.context().config().forwarding_fee_base_msat as u64,
+ channel.context().config().forwarding_fee_proportional_millionths as u64)
+ }
+ };
+ ((fwd_amt_msat * prop_fee / 1_000_000) + base_fee) as u32
};
- if $idx == 1 { fee += expected_extra_fees[i]; }
- expect_payment_forwarded!(*$node, $next_node, $prev_node, Some(fee as u64), false, false);
- expected_total_fee_msat += fee as u64;
+
+ let mut expected_extra_fee = None;
+ if $idx == 1 {
+ fee += expected_extra_fees[i];
+ fee += expected_min_htlc_overpay[i];
+ expected_extra_fee = if expected_extra_fees[i] > 0 { Some(expected_extra_fees[i] as u64) } else { None };
+ }
+ let mut events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let actual_fee = expect_payment_forwarded(events.pop().unwrap(), *$node, $next_node, $prev_node,
+ Some(fee as u64), expected_extra_fee, false, false, allow_1_msat_fee_overpay);
+ expected_total_fee_msat += actual_fee.unwrap();
+ fwd_amt_msat += actual_fee.unwrap();
check_added_monitors!($node, 1);
let new_next_msgs = if $new_msgs {
let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
tx_broadcaster: &chanmon_cfgs[i].tx_broadcaster,
fee_estimator: &chanmon_cfgs[i].fee_estimator,
router: test_utils::TestRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), &chanmon_cfgs[i].logger, &chanmon_cfgs[i].scorer),
- message_router: test_utils::TestMessageRouter::new(network_graph.clone()),
+ message_router: test_utils::TestMessageRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), &chanmon_cfgs[i].keys_manager),
chain_monitor,
keys_manager: &chanmon_cfgs[i].keys_manager,
node_seed: seed,
/// also fail.
pub fn test_txn_broadcast<'a, 'b, 'c>(node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, chan: &(msgs::ChannelUpdate, msgs::ChannelUpdate, ChannelId, Transaction), commitment_tx: Option<Transaction>, has_htlc_tx: HTLCType) -> Vec<Transaction> {
let mut node_txn = node.tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
- let mut txn_seen = HashSet::new();
+ let mut txn_seen = new_hash_set();
node_txn.retain(|tx| txn_seen.insert(tx.txid()));
assert!(node_txn.len() >= if commitment_tx.is_some() { 0 } else { 1 } + if has_htlc_tx == HTLCType::NONE { 0 } else { 1 });
pub fn check_preimage_claim<'a, 'b, 'c>(node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, prev_txn: &Vec<Transaction>) -> Vec<Transaction> {
let mut node_txn = node.tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
- let mut txn_seen = HashSet::new();
+ let mut txn_seen = new_hash_set();
node_txn.retain(|tx| txn_seen.insert(tx.txid()));
let mut found_prev = false;
macro_rules! get_chan_reestablish_msgs {
($src_node: expr, $dst_node: expr) => {
{
- let mut announcements = $crate::prelude::HashSet::new();
+ let mut announcements = $crate::prelude::new_hash_set();
let mut res = Vec::with_capacity(1);
for msg in $src_node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events() {
if let MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish { ref node_id, ref msg } = msg {
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff