Merge pull request #1699 from TheBlueMatt/2022-08-announcement-rework
[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / ln / functional_test_utils.rs
index 417206126cd1fb487beb34df1c2370e37cc99f56..554e60ba7379117c6b1842f01416fbca11bc7718 100644 (file)
@@ -304,9 +304,18 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'c> Drop for Node<'a, 'b, 'c> {
        fn drop(&mut self) {
                if !panicking() {
                        // Check that we processed all pending events
-                       assert!(self.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
-                       assert!(self.node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
-                       assert!(self.chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+                       let msg_events = self.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+                       if !msg_events.is_empty() {
+                               panic!("Had excess message events on node {}: {:?}", self.logger.id, msg_events);
+                       }
+                       let events = self.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+                       if !events.is_empty() {
+                               panic!("Had excess events on node {}: {:?}", self.logger.id, events);
+                       }
+                       let added_monitors = self.chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
+                       if !added_monitors.is_empty() {
+                               panic!("Had {} excess added monitors on node {}", added_monitors.len(), self.logger.id);
+                       }
 
                        // Check that if we serialize the Router, we can deserialize it again.
                        {
@@ -1530,9 +1539,9 @@ impl<'a> PaymentFailedConditions<'a> {
 
 #[cfg(test)]
 macro_rules! expect_payment_failed_with_update {
-       ($node: expr, $expected_payment_hash: expr, $rejected_by_dest: expr, $scid: expr, $chan_closed: expr) => {
+       ($node: expr, $expected_payment_hash: expr, $payment_failed_permanently: expr, $scid: expr, $chan_closed: expr) => {
                $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_payment_failed_conditions(
-                       &$node, $expected_payment_hash, $rejected_by_dest,
+                       &$node, $expected_payment_hash, $payment_failed_permanently,
                        $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::PaymentFailedConditions::new()
                                .blamed_scid($scid).blamed_chan_closed($chan_closed));
        }
@@ -1540,28 +1549,28 @@ macro_rules! expect_payment_failed_with_update {
 
 #[cfg(test)]
 macro_rules! expect_payment_failed {
-       ($node: expr, $expected_payment_hash: expr, $rejected_by_dest: expr $(, $expected_error_code: expr, $expected_error_data: expr)*) => {
+       ($node: expr, $expected_payment_hash: expr, $payment_failed_permanently: expr $(, $expected_error_code: expr, $expected_error_data: expr)*) => {
                #[allow(unused_mut)]
                let mut conditions = $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::PaymentFailedConditions::new();
                $(
                        conditions = conditions.expected_htlc_error_data($expected_error_code, &$expected_error_data);
                )*
-               $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_payment_failed_conditions(&$node, $expected_payment_hash, $rejected_by_dest, conditions);
+               $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_payment_failed_conditions(&$node, $expected_payment_hash, $payment_failed_permanently, conditions);
        };
 }
 
 pub fn expect_payment_failed_conditions_event<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd, 'e>(
        node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, payment_failed_event: Event, expected_payment_hash: PaymentHash,
-       expected_rejected_by_dest: bool, conditions: PaymentFailedConditions<'e>
+       expected_payment_failed_permanently: bool, conditions: PaymentFailedConditions<'e>
 ) {
        let expected_payment_id = match payment_failed_event {
-               Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, path, retry, payment_id, network_update, short_channel_id,
+               Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, path, retry, payment_id, network_update, short_channel_id,
                        #[cfg(test)]
                        error_code,
                        #[cfg(test)]
                        error_data, .. } => {
                        assert_eq!(payment_hash, expected_payment_hash, "unexpected payment_hash");
-                       assert_eq!(rejected_by_dest, expected_rejected_by_dest, "unexpected rejected_by_dest value");
+                       assert_eq!(payment_failed_permanently, expected_payment_failed_permanently, "unexpected payment_failed_permanently value");
                        assert!(retry.is_some(), "expected retry.is_some()");
                        assert_eq!(retry.as_ref().unwrap().final_value_msat, path.last().unwrap().fee_msat, "Retry amount should match last hop in path");
                        assert_eq!(retry.as_ref().unwrap().payment_params.payee_pubkey, path.last().unwrap().pubkey, "Retry payee node_id should match last hop in path");
@@ -1618,12 +1627,12 @@ pub fn expect_payment_failed_conditions_event<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd, 'e>(
 }
 
 pub fn expect_payment_failed_conditions<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd, 'e>(
-       node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, expected_payment_hash: PaymentHash, expected_rejected_by_dest: bool,
+       node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, expected_payment_hash: PaymentHash, expected_payment_failed_permanently: bool,
        conditions: PaymentFailedConditions<'e>
 ) {
        let mut events = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
        assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
-       expect_payment_failed_conditions_event(node, events.pop().unwrap(), expected_payment_hash, expected_rejected_by_dest, conditions);
+       expect_payment_failed_conditions_event(node, events.pop().unwrap(), expected_payment_hash, expected_payment_failed_permanently, conditions);
 }
 
 pub fn send_along_route_with_secret<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, route: Route, expected_paths: &[&[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>]], recv_value: u64, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash, our_payment_secret: PaymentSecret) -> PaymentId {
@@ -1967,9 +1976,9 @@ pub fn pass_failed_payment_back<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expe
                        let events = origin_node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
                        assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
                        let expected_payment_id = match events[0] {
-                               Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, all_paths_failed, ref path, ref payment_id, .. } => {
+                               Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, all_paths_failed, ref path, ref payment_id, .. } => {
                                        assert_eq!(payment_hash, our_payment_hash);
-                                       assert!(rejected_by_dest);
+                                       assert!(payment_failed_permanently);
                                        assert_eq!(all_paths_failed, i == expected_paths.len() - 1);
                                        for (idx, hop) in expected_route.iter().enumerate() {
                                                assert_eq!(hop.node.get_our_node_id(), path[idx].pubkey);