let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
//Force duplicate channel ids
for node in nodes.iter() {
- *node.keys_manager.override_channel_id_priv.lock().unwrap() = Some([0; 32]);
+ *node.keys_manager.override_random_bytes.lock().unwrap() = Some([0; 32]);
}
// BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must ensure temporary_channel_id is unique from any other channel ID with the same peer.
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).unwrap();
let node0_to_1_send_open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &node0_to_1_send_open_channel);
+ get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
//Create a second channel with a channel_id collision
- assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_err());
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_err());
}
#[test]
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage_2);
}
+#[test]
+fn test_dup_htlc_second_fail_panic() {
+ // Previously, if we received two HTLCs back-to-back, where the second overran the expected
+ // value for the payment, we'd fail back both HTLCs after generating a `PaymentReceived` event.
+ // Then, if the user failed the second payment, they'd hit a "tried to fail an already failed
+ // HTLC" debug panic. This tests for this behavior, checking that only one HTLC is auto-failed.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id())
+ .with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let route = get_route(
+ &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_params, &nodes[0].network_graph,
+ Some(&nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()),
+ 10_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, nodes[0].logger, &scorer).unwrap();
+
+ let (_, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[1]);
+
+ {
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
+ }
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, 10_000);
+
+ {
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
+ // At this point, nodes[1] would notice it has too much value for the payment. It will
+ // assume the second is a privacy attack (no longer particularly relevant
+ // post-payment_secrets) and fail back the new HTLC. Previously, it'd also have failed back
+ // the first HTLC delivered above.
+ }
+
+ // Now we go fail back the first HTLC from the user end.
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]);
+ nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
+ nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash);
+
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]);
+ nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
+
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ assert_eq!(fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 2);
+
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
+
+ let failure_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(failure_events.len(), 2);
+ if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[0] {} else { panic!(); }
+ if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[1] {} else { panic!(); }
+}
+
#[test]
fn test_keysend_payments_to_public_node() {
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff