use crate::ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash};
use crate::ln::channel::{commitment_tx_base_weight, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC, CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER, FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT};
use crate::ln::channelmanager::{self, PaymentId, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, RecipientOnionFields, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, ENABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS, DISABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
-use crate::ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError};
+use crate::ln::channel::{DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS, Channel, ChannelError};
use crate::ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils};
use crate::ln::chan_utils::{OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT, htlc_success_tx_weight, htlc_timeout_tx_weight, HTLCOutputInCommitment};
use crate::routing::gossip::{NetworkGraph, NetworkUpdate};
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
+ // Fetch a route in advance as we will be unable to once we're unable to send.
+ let (route, payment_hash_1, _, payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 100000);
+
let mut payments = Vec::new();
for _ in 0..50 {
let (route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 100000);
// There is now one HTLC in an outbound commitment transaction and (OUR_MAX_HTLCS - 1) HTLCs in
// the holding cell waiting on B's RAA to send. At this point we should not be able to add
// another HTLC.
- let (route, payment_hash_1, _, payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 100000);
{
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_1,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_1), PaymentId(payment_hash_1.0)
- ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
- assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
+ ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs", 1);
}
// This should also be true if we try to forward a payment.
// The 2* and +1 are for the fee spike reserve.
let commit_tx_fee = 2 * commit_tx_fee_msat(get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2), 1 + 1, get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2));
let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - commit_tx_fee;
- let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_can_send + 1);
+ let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) =
+ get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_can_send);
+ route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat += 1;
let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).err().unwrap();
match err {
PaymentSendFailure::AllFailedResendSafe(ref fails) => {
- match &fails[0] {
- &APIError::ChannelUnavailable{ref err} =>
- assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)),
- _ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"),
- }
+ if let &APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. } = &fails[0] {}
+ else { panic!("Unexpected error variant"); }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"),
}
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value", 1);
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1]], max_can_send);
}
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
- let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 3460001);
+ let (mut route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) =
+ get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 3460000);
+ route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat += 1;
// Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).expect("RNG is bad!");
let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt);
+ // Fetch a route in advance as we will be unable to once we're unable to send.
+ let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1_000_000);
// Sending exactly enough to hit the reserve amount should be accepted
for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT {
let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
}
// However one more HTLC should be significantly over the reserve amount and fail.
- let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1_000_000);
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
- ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
- assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value"));
+ ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value".to_string(), 1);
}
#[test]
let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
}
- let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 700_000);
+ let (mut route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) =
+ get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1000);
+ route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = 700_000;
// Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
}
// One more than the dust amt should fail, however.
- let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], dust_amt + 1);
+ let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) =
+ get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], dust_amt);
+ route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat += 1;
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
- ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
- assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value"));
+ ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
}
#[test]
let commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs = commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 2, opt_anchors);
let recv_value_2 = chan_stat.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat_1 - chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat - total_routing_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs + 1;
let amt_msat_2 = recv_value_2 + total_routing_fee_msat;
- let (route_2, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], amt_msat_2);
+ let mut route_2 = route_1.clone();
+ route_2.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat = amt_msat_2;
// Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
- ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
- assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
+ ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept", 1);
}
// channel reserve is bigger than their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat so loop to deplete
// channel reserve test with htlc pending output > 0
let recv_value_2 = stat01.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat_1 - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs;
{
- let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_2 + 1);
+ let mut route = route_1.clone();
+ route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat = recv_value_2 + 1;
+ let (_, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[2]);
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
- ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
- assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
+ ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
}
// test with outbound holding cell amount > 0
{
- let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_22+1);
+ let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) =
+ get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_22);
+ route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat += 1;
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
- ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
- assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
+ ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value", 2);
}
let (route_22, our_payment_hash_22, our_payment_preimage_22, our_payment_secret_22) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_22);
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
- nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), remote_network_address: None }, true).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
+ features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
+ }, true).unwrap();
let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(reestablish_1.len(), 1);
- nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), remote_network_address: None }, false).unwrap();
+ nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
+ features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
+ }, false).unwrap();
let reestablish_2 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
assert_eq!(reestablish_2.len(), 1);
chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0);
nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 1 HTLC updates in channel {}", hex::encode(chan.2)), 1);
- let failure_log = format!("Failed to send HTLC with payment_hash {} due to Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value ({}) in channel {}",
- hex::encode(our_payment_hash.0), chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat, hex::encode(chan.2));
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), failure_log.to_string(), 1);
// Check that the payment failed to be sent out.
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0);
nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 2 HTLC updates in channel {}", hex::encode(chan.2)), 1);
- let failure_log = format!("Failed to send HTLC with payment_hash {} due to Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value ({}) in channel {}",
- hex::encode(payment_hash_2.0), chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat, hex::encode(chan.2));
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), failure_log.to_string(), 1);
// Check that the second payment failed to be sent out.
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free_multihop() {
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
- // When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
- // It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
+ // Avoid having to include routing fees in calculations
let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
- config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196;
+ config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 0;
+ config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_proportional_millionths = 0;
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
let chan_0_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_0_1.2);
// Send a payment which passes reserve checks but gets stuck in the holding cell.
- let feemsat = 239;
- let total_routing_fee_msat = (nodes.len() - 2) as u64 * feemsat;
- let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1, opt_anchors) - total_routing_fee_msat;
+ let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1, opt_anchors);
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], max_can_send);
let payment_event = {
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
- ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
- assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
+ ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value", 1);
}
#[test]
let max_accepted_htlcs = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id())
.unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().counterparty_max_accepted_htlcs as u64;
+ // Fetch a route in advance as we will be unable to once we're unable to send.
+ let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
for i in 0..max_accepted_htlcs {
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
let payment_event = {
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, 100000);
}
- let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
- ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
- assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
+ ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs", 1);
}
#[test]
route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = max_in_flight + 1;
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
- ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
- assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
-
+ ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept", 1);
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], max_in_flight);
}
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
- let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 3999999);
+ let send_amt = 3999999;
+ let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) =
+ get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000);
+ route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = send_amt;
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::signing_only(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
let (onion_payloads, _htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(
- &route.paths[0], 3999999, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
+ &route.paths[0], send_amt, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash).unwrap();
let mut msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
//Disconnect and Reconnect
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
- nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), remote_network_address: None }, true).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
+ features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
+ }, true).unwrap();
let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(reestablish_1.len(), 1);
- nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), remote_network_address: None }, false).unwrap();
+ nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
+ features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
+ }, false).unwrap();
let reestablish_2 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
assert_eq!(reestablish_2.len(), 1);
nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[0]);
}
}
// Reconnect peers
- nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), remote_network_address: None }, true).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
+ features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
+ }, true).unwrap();
let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(reestablish_1.len(), 3);
- nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), remote_network_address: None }, false).unwrap();
+ nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
+ features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
+ }, false).unwrap();
let reestablish_2 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
assert_eq!(reestablish_2.len(), 3);
}
}
-#[test]
-fn test_pending_claimed_htlc_no_balance_underflow() {
- // Tests that if we have a pending outbound HTLC as well as a claimed-but-not-fully-removed
- // HTLC we will not underflow when we call `Channel::get_balance_msat()`.
- let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
- let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
- let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
- let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
- create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 0);
-
- let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_010_000);
- nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
- expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 1_010_000);
- check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
- let fulfill_ev = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
-
- nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fulfill_ev.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
- expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
- nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fulfill_ev.commitment_signed);
- check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
- let (_raa, _cs) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
-
- // At this point nodes[1] has received 1,010k msat (10k msat more than their reserve) and can
- // send an HTLC back (though it will go in the holding cell). Send an HTLC back and check we
- // can get our balance.
-
- // Get a route from nodes[1] to nodes[0] by getting a route going the other way and then flip
- // the public key of the only hop. This works around ChannelDetails not showing the
- // almost-claimed HTLC as available balance.
- let (mut route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 10_000);
- route.payment_params = None; // This is all wrong, but unnecessary
- route.paths[0].hops[0].pubkey = nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id();
- let (_, payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
- nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_2,
- RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_2), PaymentId(payment_hash_2.0)).unwrap();
-
- assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels()[0].balance_msat, 1_000_000);
-}
-
#[test]
fn test_channel_conf_timeout() {
// Tests that, for inbound channels, we give up on them if the funding transaction does not
let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &channel_ready);
update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update);
+ // Fetch a route in advance as we will be unable to once we're unable to send.
+ let (mut route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) =
+ get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000);
+
let dust_buffer_feerate = {
let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_success_tx_weight(opt_anchors) / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
- let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx: u64 = 25;
+ let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx: u64 = 4;
let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx;
if on_holder_tx {
if dust_outbound_balance {
// Outbound dust threshold: 2132 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + counteparty's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
// Outbound dust balance: 5000 sats
- for _ in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx {
+ for _ in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx - 1 {
let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat);
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
} else {
// Inbound dust threshold: 2031 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + counteparty's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
// Inbound dust balance: 5000 sats
- for _ in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx {
+ for _ in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx - 1 {
route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat);
}
}
}
- let dust_overflow = dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat * (dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx + 1);
if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward {
- let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], if on_holder_tx { dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat });
- let mut config = UserConfig::default();
+ route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat =
+ if on_holder_tx { dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat + 1 };
// With default dust exposure: 5000 sats
if on_holder_tx {
- let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1);
- let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)
- ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
- assert_eq!(err, &format!("Cannot send value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat)));
+ ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
} else {
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)
- ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
- assert_eq!(err, &format!("Cannot send value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", dust_overflow, config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat)));
+ ), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
}
} else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception {
- let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], if on_holder_tx { dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat });
+ let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], if on_holder_tx { dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat + 1 });
nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
} else {
// Outbound dust balance: 5200 sats
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", dust_overflow, config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(),
+ format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx",
+ dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat * (dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx - 1) + dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat + 1,
+ config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
}
} else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound {
- let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 2_500_000);
+ route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat = 2_500_000;
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
{
do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(true, false);
do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(true, true);
}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_disconnects_peer_awaiting_response_ticks() {
+ // Tests that nodes which are awaiting on a response critical for channel responsiveness
+ // disconnect their counterparty after `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
+ let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ // Asserts a disconnect event is queued to the user.
+ let check_disconnect_event = |node: &Node, should_disconnect: bool| {
+ let disconnect_event = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().iter().find_map(|event|
+ if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action, .. } = event {
+ if let msgs::ErrorAction::DisconnectPeerWithWarning { .. } = action {
+ Some(())
+ } else {
+ None
+ }
+ } else {
+ None
+ }
+ );
+ assert_eq!(disconnect_event.is_some(), should_disconnect);
+ };
+
+ // Fires timer ticks ensuring we only attempt to disconnect peers after reaching
+ // `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
+ let check_disconnect = |node: &Node| {
+ // No disconnect without any timer ticks.
+ check_disconnect_event(node, false);
+
+ // No disconnect with 1 timer tick less than required.
+ for _ in 0..DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS - 1 {
+ node.node.timer_tick_occurred();
+ check_disconnect_event(node, false);
+ }
+
+ // Disconnect after reaching the required ticks.
+ node.node.timer_tick_occurred();
+ check_disconnect_event(node, true);
+
+ // Disconnect again on the next tick if the peer hasn't been disconnected yet.
+ node.node.timer_tick_occurred();
+ check_disconnect_event(node, true);
+ };
+
+ create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+
+ // We'll start by performing a fee update with Alice (nodes[0]) on the channel.
+ *nodes[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap() *= 2;
+ nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
+ check_added_monitors!(&nodes[0], 1);
+ let alice_fee_update = get_htlc_update_msgs(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), alice_fee_update.update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &alice_fee_update.commitment_signed);
+ check_added_monitors!(&nodes[1], 1);
+
+ // This will prompt Bob (nodes[1]) to respond with his `CommitmentSigned` and `RevokeAndACK`.
+ let (bob_revoke_and_ack, bob_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(&nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_revoke_and_ack);
+ check_added_monitors!(&nodes[0], 1);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_commitment_signed);
+ check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
+
+ // Alice then needs to send her final `RevokeAndACK` to complete the commitment dance. We
+ // pretend Bob hasn't received the message and check whether he'll disconnect Alice after
+ // reaching `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
+ let alice_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ check_disconnect(&nodes[1]);
+
+ // Now, we'll reconnect them to test awaiting a `ChannelReestablish` message.
+ //
+ // Note that since the commitment dance didn't complete above, Alice is expected to resend her
+ // final `RevokeAndACK` to Bob to complete it.
+ nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ let bob_init = msgs::Init {
+ features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
+ };
+ nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_init, true).unwrap();
+ let alice_init = msgs::Init {
+ features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
+ };
+ nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &alice_init, true).unwrap();
+
+ // Upon reconnection, Alice sends her `ChannelReestablish` to Bob. Alice, however, hasn't
+ // received Bob's yet, so she should disconnect him after reaching
+ // `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
+ let alice_channel_reestablish = get_event_msg!(
+ nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()
+ );
+ nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &alice_channel_reestablish);
+ check_disconnect(&nodes[0]);
+
+ // Bob now sends his `ChannelReestablish` to Alice to resume the channel and consider it "live".
+ let bob_channel_reestablish = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().iter().find_map(|event|
+ if let MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish { node_id, msg } = event {
+ assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ Some(msg.clone())
+ } else {
+ None
+ }
+ ).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_channel_reestablish);
+
+ // Sanity check that Alice won't disconnect Bob since she's no longer waiting for any messages.
+ for _ in 0..DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS {
+ nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
+ check_disconnect_event(&nodes[0], false);
+ }
+
+ // However, Bob is still waiting on Alice's `RevokeAndACK`, so he should disconnect her after
+ // reaching `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
+ check_disconnect(&nodes[1]);
+
+ // Finally, have Bob process the last message.
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &alice_revoke_and_ack);
+ check_added_monitors(&nodes[1], 1);
+
+ // At this point, neither node should attempt to disconnect each other, since they aren't
+ // waiting on any messages.
+ for node in &nodes {
+ for _ in 0..DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS {
+ node.node.timer_tick_occurred();
+ check_disconnect_event(node, false);
+ }
+ }
+}
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff