Upgrade rust-bitcoin to 0.31
[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / ln / functional_tests.rs
index 2f71ca66a0c3e26856b844c31155fd5abd0a5284..5d34edd6ef70d61a6c8fd6f274881eb4a1ead5dd 100644 (file)
@@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ use crate::chain::chaininterface::LowerBoundedFeeEstimator;
 use crate::chain::channelmonitor;
 use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID, CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, ANTI_REORG_DELAY};
 use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
-use crate::sign::{ecdsa::EcdsaChannelSigner, EntropySource, SignerProvider};
+use crate::sign::{ecdsa::EcdsaChannelSigner, EntropySource, OutputSpender, SignerProvider};
 use crate::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PathFailure, PaymentPurpose, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination, PaymentFailureReason};
-use crate::ln::{ChannelId, PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash};
+use crate::ln::types::{ChannelId, PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash};
 use crate::ln::channel::{commitment_tx_base_weight, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC, CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER, FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT, get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis, OutboundV1Channel, InboundV1Channel, COINBASE_MATURITY, ChannelPhase};
 use crate::ln::channelmanager::{self, PaymentId, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, RecipientOnionFields, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, ENABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS, DISABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
 use crate::ln::channel::{DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS, ChannelError};
@@ -42,19 +42,17 @@ use bitcoin::blockdata::locktime::absolute::LockTime;
 use bitcoin::blockdata::script::{Builder, ScriptBuf};
 use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes;
 use bitcoin::blockdata::constants::ChainHash;
-use bitcoin::network::constants::Network;
-use bitcoin::{Sequence, Transaction, TxIn, TxOut, Witness};
+use bitcoin::network::Network;
+use bitcoin::{Amount, Sequence, Transaction, TxIn, TxOut, Witness};
 use bitcoin::OutPoint as BitcoinOutPoint;
+use bitcoin::transaction::Version;
 
 use bitcoin::secp256k1::Secp256k1;
 use bitcoin::secp256k1::{PublicKey,SecretKey};
 
-use regex;
-
 use crate::io;
 use crate::prelude::*;
 use alloc::collections::BTreeSet;
-use core::default::Default;
 use core::iter::repeat;
 use bitcoin::hashes::Hash;
 use crate::sync::{Arc, Mutex, RwLock};
@@ -64,6 +62,38 @@ use crate::ln::chan_utils::CommitmentTransaction;
 
 use super::channel::UNFUNDED_CHANNEL_AGE_LIMIT_TICKS;
 
+#[test]
+fn test_channel_resumption_fail_post_funding() {
+       // If we fail to exchange funding with a peer prior to it disconnecting we'll resume the
+       // channel open on reconnect, however if we do exchange funding we do not currently support
+       // replaying it and here test that the channel closes.
+       let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+       let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+       let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+       let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 0, 42, None, None).unwrap();
+       let open_chan = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan);
+       let accept_chan = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_chan);
+
+       let (temp_chan_id, tx, funding_output) =
+               create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 42);
+       let new_chan_id = ChannelId::v1_from_funding_outpoint(funding_output);
+       nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temp_chan_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx).unwrap();
+
+       nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       check_closed_events(&nodes[0], &[ExpectedCloseEvent::from_id_reason(new_chan_id, true, ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer)]);
+
+       // After ddf75afd16 we'd panic on reconnection if we exchanged funding info, so test that
+       // explicitly here.
+       nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
+               features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
+       }, true).unwrap();
+       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(), Vec::new());
+}
+
 #[test]
 fn test_insane_channel_opens() {
        // Stand up a network of 2 nodes
@@ -682,7 +712,7 @@ fn test_update_fee_that_funder_cannot_afford() {
                //We made sure neither party's funds are below the dust limit and there are no HTLCs here
                assert_eq!(commitment_tx.output.len(), 2);
                let total_fee: u64 = commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 0, &channel_type_features) / 1000;
-               let mut actual_fee = commitment_tx.output.iter().fold(0, |acc, output| acc + output.value);
+               let mut actual_fee = commitment_tx.output.iter().fold(0, |acc, output| acc + output.value.to_sat());
                actual_fee = channel_value - actual_fee;
                assert_eq!(total_fee, actual_fee);
        }
@@ -1296,9 +1326,9 @@ fn test_duplicate_htlc_different_direction_onchain() {
        assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output.len(), 4); // 1 local, 1 remote, 1 htlc inbound, 1 htlc outbound
        let mut has_both_htlcs = 0; // check htlcs match ones committed
        for outp in remote_txn[0].output.iter() {
-               if outp.value == 800_000 / 1000 {
+               if outp.value.to_sat() == 800_000 / 1000 {
                        has_both_htlcs += 1;
-               } else if outp.value == 900_000 / 1000 {
+               } else if outp.value.to_sat() == 900_000 / 1000 {
                        has_both_htlcs += 1;
                }
        }
@@ -1327,12 +1357,12 @@ fn test_duplicate_htlc_different_direction_onchain() {
 
        assert_eq!(preimage_tx.input.len(), 1);
        assert_eq!(preimage_tx.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC 1 <--> 0, preimage tx
-       assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[preimage_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 800);
+       assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[preimage_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value.to_sat(), 800);
 
        assert_eq!(timeout_tx.input.len(), 1);
        assert_eq!(timeout_tx.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC 0 <--> 1, timeout tx
        check_spends!(timeout_tx, remote_txn[0]);
-       assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 900);
+       assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value.to_sat(), 900);
 
        let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
        assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
@@ -1401,11 +1431,12 @@ fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() {
        let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
        let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).expect("RNG is bad!");
 
-       let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
+       let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height + 1;
 
        let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
+       let recipient_onion_fields = RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret);
        let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0],
-               3460001, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
+               3460001, &recipient_onion_fields, cur_height, &None).unwrap();
        let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash).unwrap();
        let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
                channel_id: chan.2,
@@ -1599,10 +1630,11 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_outbound_channel() {
        // Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
        let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
        let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
-       let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
+       let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height + 1;
        let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
+       let recipient_onion_fields = RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret);
        let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0],
-               700_000, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
+               700_000, &recipient_onion_fields, cur_height, &None).unwrap();
        let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash).unwrap();
        let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
                channel_id: chan.2,
@@ -1778,10 +1810,11 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_inbound_chan() {
        // Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
        let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
        let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
-       let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
+       let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height + 1;
        let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route_2.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
+       let recipient_onion_fields = RecipientOnionFields::spontaneous_empty();
        let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(
-               &route_2.paths[0], recv_value_2, RecipientOnionFields::spontaneous_empty(), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
+               &route_2.paths[0], recv_value_2, &recipient_onion_fields, cur_height, &None).unwrap();
        let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash_1).unwrap();
        let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
                channel_id: chan.2,
@@ -2042,11 +2075,11 @@ fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() {
                        assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), receiver_node_id.unwrap());
                        assert_eq!(via_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
                        match &purpose {
-                               PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+                               PaymentPurpose::Bolt11InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
                                        assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
                                        assert_eq!(our_payment_secret_21, *payment_secret);
                                },
-                               _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+                               _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::Bolt11InvoicePayment")
                        }
                },
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
@@ -2058,11 +2091,11 @@ fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() {
                        assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), receiver_node_id.unwrap());
                        assert_eq!(via_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
                        match &purpose {
-                               PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+                               PaymentPurpose::Bolt11InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
                                        assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
                                        assert_eq!(our_payment_secret_22, *payment_secret);
                                },
-                               _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+                               _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::Bolt11InvoicePayment")
                        }
                },
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
@@ -2371,13 +2404,13 @@ fn channel_monitor_network_test() {
                connect_blocks(&nodes[3], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + 1);
                let events = nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
                assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
-               let close_chan_update_1 = match events[0] {
+               let close_chan_update_1 = match events[1] {
                        MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
                                msg.clone()
                        },
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
                };
-               match events[1] {
+               match events[0] {
                        MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { .. }, node_id } => {
                                assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id());
                        },
@@ -2403,13 +2436,13 @@ fn channel_monitor_network_test() {
                connect_blocks(&nodes[4], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER + 2);
                let events = nodes[4].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
                assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
-               let close_chan_update_2 = match events[0] {
+               let close_chan_update_2 = match events[1] {
                        MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
                                msg.clone()
                        },
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
                };
-               match events[1] {
+               match events[0] {
                        MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { .. }, node_id } => {
                                assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id());
                        },
@@ -2417,7 +2450,7 @@ fn channel_monitor_network_test() {
                }
                check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 1);
                test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[4], &chan_4, None, HTLCType::SUCCESS);
-               check_closed_event!(nodes[4], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
+               check_closed_event!(nodes[4], 1, ClosureReason::HTLCsTimedOut, [nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
 
                mine_transaction(&nodes[4], &node_txn[0]);
                check_preimage_claim(&nodes[4], &node_txn);
@@ -2430,17 +2463,17 @@ fn channel_monitor_network_test() {
 
        assert_eq!(nodes[3].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.watch_channel(OutPoint { txid: chan_3.3.txid(), index: 0 }, chan_3_mon),
                Ok(ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed));
-       check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
+       check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::HTLCsTimedOut, [nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
 }
 
 #[test]
 fn test_justice_tx_htlc_timeout() {
        // Test justice txn built on revoked HTLC-Timeout tx, against both sides
-       let mut alice_config = UserConfig::default();
+       let mut alice_config = test_default_channel_config();
        alice_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
        alice_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
        alice_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 5;
-       let mut bob_config = UserConfig::default();
+       let mut bob_config = test_default_channel_config();
        bob_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
        bob_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
        bob_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 3;
@@ -2499,11 +2532,11 @@ fn test_justice_tx_htlc_timeout() {
 #[test]
 fn test_justice_tx_htlc_success() {
        // Test justice txn built on revoked HTLC-Success tx, against both sides
-       let mut alice_config = UserConfig::default();
+       let mut alice_config = test_default_channel_config();
        alice_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
        alice_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
        alice_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 5;
-       let mut bob_config = UserConfig::default();
+       let mut bob_config = test_default_channel_config();
        bob_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
        bob_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
        bob_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 3;
@@ -2646,8 +2679,8 @@ fn do_test_forming_justice_tx_from_monitor_updates(broadcast_initial_commitment:
                }
        });
        // On the first commitment, node[1]'s balance was below dust so it didn't have an output
-       let node1_channel_balance = if broadcast_initial_commitment { 0 } else { revoked_commitment_tx.output[0].value };
-       let expected_claimable_balance = node1_channel_balance + justice_tx.output[0].value;
+       let node1_channel_balance = if broadcast_initial_commitment { 0 } else { revoked_commitment_tx.output[0].value.to_sat() };
+       let expected_claimable_balance = node1_channel_balance + justice_tx.output[0].value.to_sat();
        assert_eq!(total_claimable_balance, expected_claimable_balance);
 }
 
@@ -2750,7 +2783,7 @@ fn claim_htlc_outputs_single_tx() {
                check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
                check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
                let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
-               expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[0], events[0..1], true);
+               expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions(events[0..2].to_vec(), &[HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_2 }]);
                match events.last().unwrap() {
                        Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
@@ -2867,8 +2900,8 @@ fn test_htlc_on_chain_success() {
        check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_tx[0]);
        assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
        assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
-       assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
-       assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
+       assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
+       assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
        assert_eq!(node_txn[0].lock_time, LockTime::ZERO);
        assert_eq!(node_txn[1].lock_time, LockTime::ZERO);
 
@@ -2960,13 +2993,13 @@ fn test_htlc_on_chain_success() {
                        if $htlc_offered {
                                assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
                                assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
-                               assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
-                               assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
+                               assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
+                               assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
                        } else {
                                assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
                                assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
-                               assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
-                               assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
+                               assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
+                               assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
                        }
                        node_txn.clear();
                } }
@@ -3008,7 +3041,7 @@ fn test_htlc_on_chain_success() {
        assert_eq!(commitment_spend.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
        assert_eq!(commitment_spend.input[1].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
        assert_eq!(commitment_spend.lock_time.to_consensus_u32(), nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
-       assert!(commitment_spend.output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
+       assert!(commitment_spend.output[0].script_pubkey.is_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
        // We don't bother to check that B can claim the HTLC output on its commitment tx here as
        // we already checked the same situation with A.
 
@@ -3312,13 +3345,13 @@ fn do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(deliver_bs_raa: bool, use
                let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
                assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
                match events[0] {
-                       Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
-                       _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
-               };
-               match events[1] {
                        Event::HTLCHandlingFailed { .. } => { },
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
                }
+               match events[1] {
+                       Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
+                       _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+               };
                // Deliberately don't process the pending fail-back so they all fail back at once after
                // block connection just like the !deliver_bs_raa case
        }
@@ -3503,9 +3536,10 @@ fn fail_backward_pending_htlc_upon_channel_failure() {
 
                let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
                let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
-               let current_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
+               let current_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height + 1;
+               let recipient_onion_fields = RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret);
                let (onion_payloads, _amount_msat, cltv_expiry) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(
-                       &route.paths[0], 50_000, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), current_height, &None).unwrap();
+                       &route.paths[0], 50_000, &recipient_onion_fields, current_height, &None).unwrap();
                let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
                let onion_routing_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash).unwrap();
 
@@ -3737,10 +3771,10 @@ fn test_peer_disconnected_before_funding_broadcasted() {
                nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
        }
 
-       // Ensure that the channel is closed with `ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed`
-       // when the peers are disconnected and do not reconnect before the funding
-       // transaction is broadcasted.
-       check_closed_event!(&nodes[0], 2, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, true
+       // Ensure that the channel is closed with `ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer` and a
+       // `DiscardFunding` event when the peers are disconnected and do not reconnect before the
+       // funding transaction is broadcasted.
+       check_closed_event!(&nodes[0], 2, ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer, true
                , [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
        check_closed_event!(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer, false
                , [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
@@ -3957,11 +3991,11 @@ fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken
                        assert_eq!(receiver_node_id.unwrap(), nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
                        assert_eq!(via_channel_id, Some(channel_id));
                        match &purpose {
-                               PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+                               PaymentPurpose::Bolt11InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
                                        assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
                                        assert_eq!(payment_secret_1, *payment_secret);
                                },
-                               _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+                               _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::Bolt11InvoicePayment")
                        }
                },
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
@@ -4322,11 +4356,11 @@ fn test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect_dual_htlc() {
                Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, .. } => {
                        assert_eq!(payment_hash_2, *payment_hash);
                        match &purpose {
-                               PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+                               PaymentPurpose::Bolt11InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
                                        assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
                                        assert_eq!(payment_secret_2, *payment_secret);
                                },
-                               _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+                               _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::Bolt11InvoicePayment")
                        }
                },
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
@@ -4616,7 +4650,7 @@ fn test_static_spendable_outputs_preimage_tx() {
                MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
        }
-       match events[1] {
+       match events[2] {
                MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
                _ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
        }
@@ -4659,7 +4693,7 @@ fn test_static_spendable_outputs_timeout_tx() {
        mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx[0]);
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
        let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
-       match events[0] {
+       match events[1] {
                MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
        }
@@ -4910,7 +4944,7 @@ fn test_onchain_to_onchain_claim() {
        assert_eq!(c_txn.len(), 1);
        check_spends!(c_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
        assert_eq!(c_txn[0].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
-       assert!(c_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
+       assert!(c_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
        assert_eq!(c_txn[0].lock_time, LockTime::ZERO); // Success tx
 
        // So we broadcast C's commitment tx and HTLC-Success on B's chain, we should successfully be able to extract preimage and update downstream monitor
@@ -4971,7 +5005,7 @@ fn test_onchain_to_onchain_claim() {
        assert_eq!(b_txn.len(), 1);
        check_spends!(b_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
        assert_eq!(b_txn[0].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
-       assert!(b_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
+       assert!(b_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
        assert_eq!(b_txn[0].lock_time.to_consensus_u32(), nodes[1].best_block_info().1); // Success tx
 
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
@@ -5058,9 +5092,9 @@ fn test_duplicate_payment_hash_one_failure_one_success() {
                // (with value 900 sats) will be claimed in the below `claim_funds` call.
                if node_txn.len() > 2 {
                        assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
-                       htlc_timeout_tx = if node_txn[2].output[0].value < 900 { node_txn[2].clone() } else { node_txn[0].clone() };
+                       htlc_timeout_tx = if node_txn[2].output[0].value.to_sat() < 900 { node_txn[2].clone() } else { node_txn[0].clone() };
                } else {
-                       htlc_timeout_tx = if node_txn[0].output[0].value < 900 { node_txn[1].clone() } else { node_txn[0].clone() };
+                       htlc_timeout_tx = if node_txn[0].output[0].value.to_sat() < 900 { node_txn[1].clone() } else { node_txn[0].clone() };
                }
        }
 
@@ -5075,7 +5109,7 @@ fn test_duplicate_payment_hash_one_failure_one_success() {
                MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
        }
-       match events[1] {
+       match events[2] {
                MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
                _ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
        }
@@ -5153,7 +5187,7 @@ fn test_dynamic_spendable_outputs_local_htlc_success_tx() {
                MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
        }
-       match events[1] {
+       match events[2] {
                MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
                _ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
        }
@@ -5351,7 +5385,7 @@ fn do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(deliver_last_raa: bool, anno
        connect_blocks(&nodes[2], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
        if deliver_last_raa {
-               expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[2], events[0..1], true);
+               expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[2], events[1..2], true);
 
                let expected_destinations: Vec<HTLCDestination> = repeat(HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }).take(3).collect();
                expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!(nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), expected_destinations);
@@ -5682,7 +5716,7 @@ fn do_htlc_claim_local_commitment_only(use_dust: bool) {
        test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan, None, if use_dust { HTLCType::NONE } else { HTLCType::SUCCESS });
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
-       check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
+       check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HTLCsTimedOut, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
 }
 
 fn do_htlc_claim_current_remote_commitment_only(use_dust: bool) {
@@ -5713,7 +5747,7 @@ fn do_htlc_claim_current_remote_commitment_only(use_dust: bool) {
        test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan, None, HTLCType::NONE);
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
-       check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
+       check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HTLCsTimedOut, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
 }
 
 fn do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(use_dust: bool, check_revoke_no_close: bool) {
@@ -5759,7 +5793,7 @@ fn do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(use_dust: bool, check_revoke_no
                test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan, None, HTLCType::NONE);
                check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
                check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
-               check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
+               check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HTLCsTimedOut, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
        } else {
                expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true);
        }
@@ -6182,7 +6216,7 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free_multihop() {
        // nodes[1]'s ChannelManager will now signal that we have HTLC forwards to process.
        let process_htlc_forwards_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
        assert_eq!(process_htlc_forwards_event.len(), 2);
-       match &process_htlc_forwards_event[0] {
+       match &process_htlc_forwards_event[1] {
                &Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => {},
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
        }
@@ -6488,10 +6522,11 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_max_htlc_limit() {
                get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000);
        route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = send_amt;
        let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
-       let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
+       let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height + 1;
        let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::signing_only(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
+       let recipient_onion_fields = RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret);
        let (onion_payloads, _htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(
-               &route.paths[0], send_amt, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
+               &route.paths[0], send_amt, &recipient_onion_fields, cur_height, &None).unwrap();
        let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash).unwrap();
 
        let mut msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
@@ -7334,6 +7369,9 @@ fn test_announce_disable_channels() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
+       // Connect a dummy node for proper future events broadcasting
+       connect_dummy_node(&nodes[0]);
+
        create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
        create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 0);
        create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
@@ -7440,8 +7478,8 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_commitment() {
 
        let mut penalty_sum = 0;
        for outp in revoked_txn[0].output.iter() {
-               if outp.script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh() {
-                       penalty_sum += outp.value;
+               if outp.script_pubkey.is_p2wsh() {
+                       penalty_sum += outp.value.to_sat();
                }
        }
 
@@ -7462,7 +7500,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_commitment() {
                assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Penalty txn claims to_local, offered_htlc and received_htlc outputs
                assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
                check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_txn[0]);
-               let fee_1 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
+               let fee_1 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value.to_sat();
                feerate_1 = fee_1 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight().to_wu();
                penalty_1 = node_txn[0].txid();
                node_txn.clear();
@@ -7482,7 +7520,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_commitment() {
                        penalty_2 = node_txn[0].txid();
                        // Verify new bumped tx is different from last claiming transaction, we don't want spurrious rebroadcast
                        assert_ne!(penalty_2, penalty_1);
-                       let fee_2 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
+                       let fee_2 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value.to_sat();
                        feerate_2 = fee_2 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight().to_wu();
                        // Verify 25% bump heuristic
                        assert!(feerate_2 * 100 >= feerate_1 * 125);
@@ -7505,7 +7543,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_commitment() {
                        penalty_3 = node_txn[0].txid();
                        // Verify new bumped tx is different from last claiming transaction, we don't want spurrious rebroadcast
                        assert_ne!(penalty_3, penalty_2);
-                       let fee_3 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
+                       let fee_3 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value.to_sat();
                        feerate_3 = fee_3 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight().to_wu();
                        // Verify 25% bump heuristic
                        assert!(feerate_3 * 100 >= feerate_2 * 125);
@@ -7543,7 +7581,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_htlcs() {
        let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, 3_000_000);
        let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &route_params, &nodes[1].network_graph.read_only(), None,
                nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &Default::default(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
-       send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
+       let failed_payment_hash = send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000).1;
 
        let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2);
        assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
@@ -7582,7 +7620,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_htlcs() {
        let block_129 = create_dummy_block(block_11.block_hash(), 42, vec![revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[1].clone()]);
        connect_block(&nodes[0], &block_129);
        let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
-       expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[0], events[0..1], true);
+       expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions(events[0..2].to_vec(), &[HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: failed_payment_hash }]);
        match events.last().unwrap() {
                Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
@@ -7724,7 +7762,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_remote_commitment() {
 
                preimage = node_txn[0].txid();
                let index = node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout;
-               let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
+               let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value.to_sat() - node_txn[0].output[0].value.to_sat();
                feerate_preimage = fee * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight().to_wu();
 
                let (preimage_bump_tx, timeout_tx) = if node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output == node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output {
@@ -7739,7 +7777,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_remote_commitment() {
 
                timeout = timeout_tx.txid();
                let index = timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout;
-               let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - timeout_tx.output[0].value;
+               let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value.to_sat() - timeout_tx.output[0].value.to_sat();
                feerate_timeout = fee * 1000 / timeout_tx.weight().to_wu();
 
                node_txn.clear();
@@ -7758,13 +7796,13 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_remote_commitment() {
                check_spends!(preimage_bump, remote_txn[0]);
 
                let index = preimage_bump.input[0].previous_output.vout;
-               let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - preimage_bump.output[0].value;
+               let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value.to_sat() - preimage_bump.output[0].value.to_sat();
                let new_feerate = fee * 1000 / preimage_bump.weight().to_wu();
                assert!(new_feerate * 100 > feerate_timeout * 125);
                assert_ne!(timeout, preimage_bump.txid());
 
                let index = node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout;
-               let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
+               let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value.to_sat() - node_txn[0].output[0].value.to_sat();
                let new_feerate = fee * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight().to_wu();
                assert!(new_feerate * 100 > feerate_preimage * 125);
                assert_ne!(preimage, node_txn[0].txid());
@@ -8222,8 +8260,9 @@ fn test_onion_value_mpp_set_calculation() {
                        let height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1;
                        let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&session_priv).unwrap();
                        let mut onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::new(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
+                       let recipient_onion_fields = RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret);
                        let (mut onion_payloads, _, _) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 100_000,
-                               RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), height + 1, &None).unwrap();
+                               &recipient_onion_fields, height + 1, &None).unwrap();
                        // Edit amt_to_forward to simulate the sender having set
                        // the final amount and the routing node taking less fee
                        if let msgs::OutboundOnionPayload::Receive {
@@ -8388,10 +8427,10 @@ fn test_preimage_storage() {
        match events[0] {
                Event::PaymentClaimable { ref purpose, .. } => {
                        match &purpose {
-                               PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, .. } => {
+                               PaymentPurpose::Bolt11InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, .. } => {
                                        claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage.unwrap());
                                },
-                               _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+                               _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::Bolt11InvoicePayment")
                        }
                },
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
@@ -8654,7 +8693,7 @@ fn test_concurrent_monitor_claim() {
        let height = HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST + 1;
        connect_blocks(&nodes[0], height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
        check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[0], 1, true);
-       check_closed_event!(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false,
+       check_closed_event!(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HTLCsTimedOut, false,
                [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
        watchtower_alice.chain_monitor.block_connected(&create_dummy_block(BlockHash::all_zeros(), 42, vec![bob_state_y.clone()]), height);
        check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
@@ -9387,7 +9426,7 @@ fn test_invalid_funding_tx() {
        let wit_program_script: ScriptBuf = wit_program.into();
        for output in tx.output.iter_mut() {
                // Make the confirmed funding transaction have a bogus script_pubkey
-               output.script_pubkey = ScriptBuf::new_v0_p2wsh(&wit_program_script.wscript_hash());
+               output.script_pubkey = ScriptBuf::new_p2wsh(&wit_program_script.wscript_hash());
        }
 
        nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated_unchecked(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone(), 0).unwrap();
@@ -9425,7 +9464,7 @@ fn test_invalid_funding_tx() {
        // long the ChannelMonitor will try to read 32 bytes from the second-to-last element, panicing
        // as its not 32 bytes long.
        let mut spend_tx = Transaction {
-               version: 2i32, lock_time: LockTime::ZERO,
+               version: Version::TWO, lock_time: LockTime::ZERO,
                input: tx.output.iter().enumerate().map(|(idx, _)| TxIn {
                        previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint {
                                txid: tx.txid(),
@@ -9436,7 +9475,7 @@ fn test_invalid_funding_tx() {
                        witness: Witness::from_slice(&channelmonitor::deliberately_bogus_accepted_htlc_witness())
                }).collect(),
                output: vec![TxOut {
-                       value: 1000,
+                       value: Amount::from_sat(1000),
                        script_pubkey: ScriptBuf::new(),
                }]
        };
@@ -9872,7 +9911,7 @@ enum ExposureEvent {
        AtUpdateFeeOutbound,
 }
 
-fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_event: ExposureEvent, on_holder_tx: bool, multiplier_dust_limit: bool) {
+fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_event: ExposureEvent, on_holder_tx: bool, multiplier_dust_limit: bool, apply_excess_fee: bool) {
        // Test that we properly reject dust HTLC violating our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`
        // policy.
        //
@@ -9887,12 +9926,33 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e
 
        let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
        let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
+
+       // We hard-code the feerate values here but they're re-calculated furter down and asserted.
+       // If the values ever change below these constants should simply be updated.
+       const AT_FEE_OUTBOUND_HTLCS: u64 = 20;
+       let nondust_htlc_count_in_limit =
+       if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound  {
+               AT_FEE_OUTBOUND_HTLCS
+       } else { 0 };
+       let initial_feerate = if apply_excess_fee { 253 * 2 } else { 253 };
+       let expected_dust_buffer_feerate = initial_feerate + 2530;
+       let mut commitment_tx_cost = commit_tx_fee_msat(initial_feerate - 253, nondust_htlc_count_in_limit, &ChannelTypeFeatures::empty());
+       commitment_tx_cost +=
+               if on_holder_tx {
+                       htlc_success_tx_weight(&ChannelTypeFeatures::empty())
+               } else {
+                       htlc_timeout_tx_weight(&ChannelTypeFeatures::empty())
+               } * (initial_feerate as u64 - 253) / 1000 * nondust_htlc_count_in_limit;
+       {
+               let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
+               *feerate_lock = initial_feerate;
+       }
        config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure = if multiplier_dust_limit {
                // Default test fee estimator rate is 253 sat/kw, so we set the multiplier to 5_000_000 / 253
                // to get roughly the same initial value as the default setting when this test was
                // originally written.
-               MaxDustHTLCExposure::FeeRateMultiplier(5_000_000 / 253)
-       } else { MaxDustHTLCExposure::FixedLimitMsat(5_000_000) }; // initial default setting value
+               MaxDustHTLCExposure::FeeRateMultiplier((5_000_000 + commitment_tx_cost) / 253)
+       } else { MaxDustHTLCExposure::FixedLimitMsat(5_000_000 + commitment_tx_cost) };
        let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config), None]);
        let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
@@ -9936,6 +9996,11 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e
        let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &channel_ready);
        update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update);
 
+       {
+               let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
+               *feerate_lock = 253;
+       }
+
        // Fetch a route in advance as we will be unable to once we're unable to send.
        let (mut route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) =
                get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000);
@@ -9945,16 +10010,25 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e
                let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
                let chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&channel_id).unwrap();
                (chan.context().get_dust_buffer_feerate(None) as u64,
-               chan.context().get_max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator(nodes[0].fee_estimator)))
+               chan.context().get_max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat(253))
        };
+       assert_eq!(dust_buffer_feerate, expected_dust_buffer_feerate as u64);
        let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_timeout_tx_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000 + open_channel.common_fields.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
        let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
 
-       let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_success_tx_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000 + open_channel.common_fields.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
+       // Substract 3 sats for multiplier and 2 sats for fixed limit to make sure we are 50% below the dust limit.
+       // This is to make sure we fully use the dust limit. If we don't, we could end up with `dust_ibd_htlc_on_holder_tx` being 1
+       // while `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat` is not equal to `dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat`.
+       let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_success_tx_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000 + open_channel.common_fields.dust_limit_satoshis - if multiplier_dust_limit { 3 } else { 2 }) * 1000;
        let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
 
+       // This test was written with a fixed dust value here, which we retain, but assert that it is,
+       // indeed, dust on both transactions.
        let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx: u64 = 4;
-       let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx;
+       let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = 1_250_000;
+       let calcd_dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_timeout_tx_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000 + open_channel.common_fields.dust_limit_satoshis - if multiplier_dust_limit { 3 } else { 2 }) * 1000;
+       assert!(dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat < dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat);
+       assert!(dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat < calcd_dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat);
 
        if on_holder_tx {
                if dust_outbound_balance {
@@ -10024,7 +10098,7 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e
                        // Outbound dust balance: 5200 sats
                        nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel",
                                format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx",
-                                       dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat * (dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx - 1) + dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat + 4,
+                                       dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat * dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx + commitment_tx_cost + 4,
                                        max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
                }
        } else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound {
@@ -10032,7 +10106,7 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e
                // For the multiplier dust exposure limit, since it scales with feerate,
                // we need to add a lot of HTLCs that will become dust at the new feerate
                // to cross the threshold.
-               for _ in 0..20 {
+               for _ in 0..AT_FEE_OUTBOUND_HTLCS {
                        let (_, payment_hash, payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash(&nodes[1], Some(1_000), None);
                        nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
                                RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
@@ -10051,27 +10125,123 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e
        added_monitors.clear();
 }
 
-fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(multiplier_dust_limit: bool) {
-       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
-       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
-       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
-       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
-       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
-       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
-       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
-       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
-       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
-       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
-       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
-       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
+fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(multiplier_dust_limit: bool, apply_excess_fee: bool) {
+       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee);
+       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee);
+       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee);
+       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee);
+       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee);
+       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee);
+       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee);
+       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee);
+       if !multiplier_dust_limit && !apply_excess_fee {
+               // Because non-dust HTLC transaction fees are included in the dust exposure, trying to
+               // increase the fee to hit a higher dust exposure with a
+               // `MaxDustHTLCExposure::FeeRateMultiplier` is no longer super practical, so we skip these
+               // in the `multiplier_dust_limit` case.
+               do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee);
+               do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee);
+               do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee);
+               do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee);
+       }
 }
 
 #[test]
 fn test_max_dust_htlc_exposure() {
-       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(false);
-       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(true);
+       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(false, false);
+       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(false, true);
+       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(true, false);
+       do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(true, true);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_nondust_htlc_fees_are_dust() {
+       // Test that the transaction fees paid in nondust HTLCs count towards our dust limit
+       let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
+       let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
+
+       let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
+       // Set the dust limit to the default value
+       config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure =
+               MaxDustHTLCExposure::FeeRateMultiplier(10_000);
+       // Make sure the HTLC limits don't get in the way
+       config.channel_handshake_limits.min_max_accepted_htlcs = 400;
+       config.channel_handshake_config.our_max_accepted_htlcs = 400;
+       config.channel_handshake_config.our_htlc_minimum_msat = 1;
+
+       let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config), Some(config), Some(config)]);
+       let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+       // Create a channel from 1 -> 0 but immediately push all of the funds towards 0
+       let chan_id_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 0).2;
+       while nodes[1].node.list_channels()[0].next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat > 0 {
+               send_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], nodes[1].node.list_channels()[0].next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat);
+       }
+
+       // First get the channel one HTLC_VALUE HTLC away from the dust limit by sending dust HTLCs
+       // repeatedly until we run out of space.
+       const HTLC_VALUE: u64 = 1_000_000; // Doesn't matter, tune until the test passes
+       let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], HTLC_VALUE).0;
+
+       while nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].next_outbound_htlc_minimum_msat == 0 {
+               route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], HTLC_VALUE);
+       }
+       assert_ne!(nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat, 0,
+               "We don't want to run out of ability to send because of some non-dust limit");
+       assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].pending_outbound_htlcs.len() < 10,
+               "We should be able to fill our dust limit without too many HTLCs");
+
+       let dust_limit = nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].next_outbound_htlc_minimum_msat;
+       claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage);
+       assert_ne!(nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].next_outbound_htlc_minimum_msat, 0,
+               "Make sure we are able to send once we clear one HTLC");
+
+       // At this point we have somewhere between dust_limit and dust_limit * 2 left in our dust
+       // exposure limit, and we want to max that out using non-dust HTLCs.
+       let commitment_tx_per_htlc_cost =
+               htlc_success_tx_weight(&ChannelTypeFeatures::empty()) * 253;
+       let max_htlcs_remaining = dust_limit * 2 / commitment_tx_per_htlc_cost;
+       assert!(max_htlcs_remaining < 30,
+               "We should be able to fill our dust limit without too many HTLCs");
+       for i in 0..max_htlcs_remaining + 1 {
+               assert_ne!(i, max_htlcs_remaining);
+               if nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat < dust_limit {
+                       // We found our limit, and it was less than max_htlcs_remaining!
+                       // At this point we can only send dust HTLCs as any non-dust HTLCs will overuse our
+                       // remaining dust exposure.
+                       break;
+               }
+               route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], dust_limit * 2);
+       }
+
+       // At this point non-dust HTLCs are no longer accepted from node 0 -> 1, we also check that
+       // such HTLCs can't be routed over the same channel either.
+       create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 0);
+       let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) =
+               get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[2], nodes[1], dust_limit * 2);
+       let onion = RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret);
+       nodes[2].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash, onion, PaymentId([0; 32])).unwrap();
+       check_added_monitors(&nodes[2], 1);
+       let send = SendEvent::from_node(&nodes[2]);
+
+       nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &send.msgs[0]);
+       commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[2], send.commitment_msg, false, true);
+
+       expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[0]);
+       check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
+       let node_id_1 = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
+       expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!(
+               nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(),
+               &[HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(node_id_1), channel_id: chan_id_1 }]
+       );
+
+       let fail = get_htlc_update_msgs(&nodes[0], &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
+       commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[0], fail.commitment_signed, false);
+       expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[2], payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
 }
 
+
 #[test]
 fn test_non_final_funding_tx() {
        let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
@@ -10085,7 +10255,7 @@ fn test_non_final_funding_tx() {
        let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
        nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel_message);
 
-       let best_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
+       let best_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height;
 
        let chan_id = *nodes[0].network_chan_count.borrow();
        let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
@@ -10094,8 +10264,8 @@ fn test_non_final_funding_tx() {
        let mut tx = match events[0] {
                Event::FundingGenerationReady { ref channel_value_satoshis, ref output_script, .. } => {
                        // Timelock the transaction _beyond_ the best client height + 1.
-                       Transaction { version: chan_id as i32, lock_time: LockTime::from_height(best_height + 2).unwrap(), input: vec![input], output: vec![TxOut {
-                               value: *channel_value_satoshis, script_pubkey: output_script.clone(),
+                       Transaction { version: Version(chan_id as i32), lock_time: LockTime::from_height(best_height + 2).unwrap(), input: vec![input], output: vec![TxOut {
+                               value: Amount::from_sat(*channel_value_satoshis), script_pubkey: output_script.clone(),
                        }]}
                },
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
@@ -10107,14 +10277,9 @@ fn test_non_final_funding_tx() {
                },
                _ => panic!()
        }
-       let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
-       assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
-       match events[0] {
-               Event::ChannelClosed { channel_id, .. } => {
-                       assert_eq!(channel_id, temp_channel_id);
-               },
-               _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
-       }
+       let err = "Error in transaction funding: Misuse error: Funding transaction absolute timelock is non-final".to_owned();
+       check_closed_events(&nodes[0], &[ExpectedCloseEvent::from_id_reason(temp_channel_id, false, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err })]);
+       assert_eq!(get_err_msg(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).data, "Failed to fund channel");
 }
 
 #[test]
@@ -10130,7 +10295,7 @@ fn test_non_final_funding_tx_within_headroom() {
        let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
        nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel_message);
 
-       let best_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
+       let best_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height;
 
        let chan_id = *nodes[0].network_chan_count.borrow();
        let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
@@ -10139,8 +10304,8 @@ fn test_non_final_funding_tx_within_headroom() {
        let mut tx = match events[0] {
                Event::FundingGenerationReady { ref channel_value_satoshis, ref output_script, .. } => {
                        // Timelock the transaction within a +1 headroom from the best block.
-                       Transaction { version: chan_id as i32, lock_time: LockTime::from_consensus(best_height + 1), input: vec![input], output: vec![TxOut {
-                               value: *channel_value_satoshis, script_pubkey: output_script.clone(),
+                       Transaction { version: Version(chan_id as i32), lock_time: LockTime::from_consensus(best_height + 1), input: vec![input], output: vec![TxOut {
+                               value: Amount::from_sat(*channel_value_satoshis), script_pubkey: output_script.clone(),
                        }]}
                },
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
@@ -10983,3 +11148,36 @@ fn test_funding_and_commitment_tx_confirm_same_block() {
        do_test_funding_and_commitment_tx_confirm_same_block(false);
        do_test_funding_and_commitment_tx_confirm_same_block(true);
 }
+
+#[test]
+fn test_accept_inbound_channel_errors_queued() {
+       // For manually accepted inbound channels, tests that a close error is correctly handled
+       // and the channel fails for the initiator.
+       let mut config0 = test_default_channel_config();
+       let mut config1 = config0.clone();
+       config1.channel_handshake_limits.their_to_self_delay = 1000;
+       config1.manually_accept_inbound_channels = true;
+       config0.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 2000;
+
+       let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+       let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+       let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config0), Some(config1)]);
+       let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None, None).unwrap();
+       let open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+       nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
+       let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+       match events[0] {
+               Event::OpenChannelRequest { temporary_channel_id, .. } => {
+                       match nodes[1].node.accept_inbound_channel(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 23) {
+                               Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err: _ }) => (),
+                               _ => panic!(),
+                       }
+               }
+               _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+       }
+       assert_eq!(get_err_msg(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).channel_id,
+               open_channel_msg.common_fields.temporary_channel_id);
+}