use chain::channelmonitor::{ChannelMonitor, CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, ANTI_REORG_DELAY};
use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
use chain::keysinterface::{KeysInterface, BaseSign};
+use ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash};
use ln::channel::{COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC};
-use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash, PaymentSendFailure, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT};
+use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT};
use ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError};
use ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils};
use routing::router::{Route, RouteHop, get_route};
use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler,RoutingMessageHandler,HTLCFailChannelUpdate, ErrorAction};
use util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingSigner;
use util::{byte_utils, test_utils};
-use util::events::{Event, EventsProvider, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider};
+use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider};
use util::errors::APIError;
use util::ser::{Writeable, ReadableArgs};
use util::config::UserConfig;
use regex;
use std::collections::{BTreeSet, HashMap, HashSet};
-use std::default::Default;
+use core::default::Default;
use std::sync::Mutex;
use ln::functional_test_utils::*;
let channel_id = chan.2;
// balancing
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
// A B
// update_fee ->
let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
// balancing
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
// First nodes[0] generates an update_fee
nodes[0].node.update_fee(channel_id, get_feerate!(nodes[0], channel_id) + 20).unwrap();
let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
// balancing
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], channel_id);
nodes[0].node.update_fee(channel_id, feerate+20).unwrap();
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
};
- claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], our_payment_preimage, 800_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], our_payment_preimage);
- send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 800000, 800_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 800000, 800_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 800000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 800000);
close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan.2, chan.3, true);
}
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route_1, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable {..}, {});
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route_2, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable {..}, {});
- assert!(nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage, &Some(payment_secret), 100_000));
+ assert!(nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- let (our_payment_preimage, _, our_payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 100000);
+ let (our_payment_preimage, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 100000);
nodes[1].node.close_channel(&chan_1.2).unwrap();
let node_1_shutdown = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- assert!(nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage, &Some(our_payment_secret), 100_000));
+ assert!(nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
let chan_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels...
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
// Send some more payments
- send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 1000000, 1_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[3], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[1], &nodes[0])[..], 1000000, 1_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[3], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000, 1_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 1000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[3], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[1], &nodes[0])[..], 1000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[3], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000);
// Test failure packets
let payment_hash_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 1000000).1;
// Add a new channel that skips 3
let chan_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], 1000000, 1_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 1000000, 1_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], 1000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 1000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
// Do some rebalance loop payments, simultaneously
let mut hops = Vec::with_capacity(3);
// Claim the rebalances...
fail_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], payment_hash_2);
- claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1, 1_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
// Add a duplicate new channel from 2 to 4
let chan_5 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
//TODO: Test that routes work again here as we've been notified that the channel is full
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], payment_preimage_3, 3_000_000);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], payment_preimage_4, 3_000_000);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], payment_preimage_5, 3_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], payment_preimage_3);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], payment_preimage_4);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], payment_preimage_5);
// Close down the channels...
close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan_1.2, chan_1.3, true);
}
for (preimage, _) in payments.drain(..) {
- claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2]], preimage, 100_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2]], preimage);
}
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1000000, 1_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1000000);
}
#[test]
*nodes[0].network_payment_count.borrow_mut() -= 1;
assert_eq!(route_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[5])[..], 1000000).0, payment_preimage);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], payment_preimage, 1_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], payment_preimage);
fail_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[5])[..], payment_hash);
- claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], payment_preimage, 1_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], payment_preimage);
}
#[test]
fn test_duplicate_htlc_different_direction_onchain() {
// Test that ChannelMonitor doesn't generate 2 preimage txn
// when we have 2 HTLCs with same preimage that go across a node
- // in opposite directions.
+ // in opposite directions, even with the same payment secret.
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
// balancing
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
- let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 900_000);
+ let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 900_000);
let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[1].net_graph_msg_handler;
let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 800_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[0]]], 800_000, payment_hash, node_a_payment_secret);
// Provide preimage to node 0 by claiming payment
- nodes[0].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage, &Some(payment_secret), 800_000);
+ nodes[0].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
// Broadcast node 1 commitment txn
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value".to_string(), 1);
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1]], max_can_send, max_can_send);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1]], max_can_send);
}
#[test]
// transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)).
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 98817000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- let dust_amt = 546000; // Dust amount
+ let dust_amt = 329000; // Dust amount
// In the previous code, routing this dust payment would cause nodes[0] to perceive a channel
// reserve violation even though it's a dust HTLC and therefore shouldn't count towards the
// commitment transaction fee.
if stat01.value_to_self_msat < stat01.channel_reserve_msat + commit_tx_fee_all_htlcs + ensure_htlc_amounts_above_dust_buffer + amt_msat {
break;
}
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1], &nodes[2]][..], recv_value_0, recv_value_0);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1], &nodes[2]][..], recv_value_0);
let (stat01_, stat11_, stat12_, stat22_) = (
get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan_1.2),
let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash_21, *payment_hash);
- assert_eq!(Some(our_payment_secret_21), *payment_secret);
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(our_payment_secret_21, *payment_secret);
assert_eq!(recv_value_21, amt);
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
match events[1] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash_22, *payment_hash);
- assert_eq!(Some(our_payment_secret_22), *payment_secret);
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(our_payment_secret_22, *payment_secret);
assert_eq!(recv_value_22, amt);
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_1, recv_value_1);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_21, recv_value_21);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_22, recv_value_22);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_1);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_21);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_22);
let commit_tx_fee_0_htlcs = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1);
let recv_value_3 = commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs - commit_tx_fee_0_htlcs - total_fee_msat;
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1], &nodes[2]][..], recv_value_3, recv_value_3);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1], &nodes[2]][..], recv_value_3);
let commit_tx_fee_1_htlc = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1);
let expected_value_to_self = stat01.value_to_self_msat - (recv_value_1 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_21 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_22 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_3 + total_fee_msat);
// Now claim both of the first two HTLCs on B's end, putting B in AwaitingRAA and generating an
// initial fulfill/CS.
- assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1, &None, b_chan_values.channel_reserve_msat - b_chan_values.value_to_self_msat - 10000));
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let bs_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
// This claim goes in B's holding cell, allowing us to have a pending B->A RAA which does not
// remove the second HTLC when we send the HTLC back from B to A.
- assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_2, &None, 20000));
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_2));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[0]);
expect_payment_received!(nodes[0], payment_hash_4, payment_secret_4, 10000);
- claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], payment_preimage_4, 10_000);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_3, 100_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], payment_preimage_4);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_3);
}
#[test]
connect_blocks(&nodes[4], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[4].best_block_info().1);
// Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels...
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
// Simple case with no pending HTLCs:
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), true);
assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
macro_rules! claim_funds {
- ($node: expr, $prev_node: expr, $preimage: expr, $amount: expr) => {
+ ($node: expr, $prev_node: expr, $preimage: expr) => {
{
- assert!($node.node.claim_funds($preimage, &None, $amount));
+ assert!($node.node.claim_funds($preimage));
check_added_monitors!($node, 1);
let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
node2_commitment_txid = node_txn[0].txid();
// Claim the payment on nodes[3], giving it knowledge of the preimage
- claim_funds!(nodes[3], nodes[2], payment_preimage_1, 3_000_000);
+ claim_funds!(nodes[3], nodes[2], payment_preimage_1);
mine_transaction(&nodes[3], &node_txn[0]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
check_preimage_claim(&nodes[3], &node_txn);
let node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[3], &chan_4, None, HTLCType::TIMEOUT);
// Claim the payment on nodes[4], giving it knowledge of the preimage
- claim_funds!(nodes[4], nodes[3], payment_preimage_2, 3_000_000);
+ claim_funds!(nodes[4], nodes[3], payment_preimage_2);
connect_blocks(&nodes[4], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER + 2);
let events = nodes[4].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.txid, revoked_local_txn[0].txid());
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC-Timeout
// Revoke the old state
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_3, 3_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_3);
{
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_6.3.txid());
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // Only HTLC and output back to A are present
// Revoke the old state
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_4, 3_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_4);
{
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
{
// Only output is the full channel value back to nodes[0]:
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
// Send a payment through, updating everyone's latest commitment txn
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 5000000, 5_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 5000000);
// Inform nodes[1] that nodes[0] broadcast a stale tx
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
// node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim both offered/received HTLC outputs on top of commitment tx
let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3000000);
check_spends!(revoked_local_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
//Revoke the old state
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1, 3_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
{
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
// node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim both offered/received HTLC outputs on top of commitment tx, but this
// time as two different claim transactions as we're gonna to timeout htlc with given a high current height
let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
//Revoke the old state
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1, 3_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
{
confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0], 100);
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels...
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
let (our_payment_preimage, _payment_hash, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), 3000000);
let (our_payment_preimage_2, _payment_hash_2, _payment_secret_2) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), 3000000);
let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
assert_eq!(commitment_tx.len(), 1);
check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_2.3);
- nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage, &None, 3_000_000);
- nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage_2, &None, 3_000_000);
+ nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
+ nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage_2);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 2);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment thorugh all the channels...
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
let (_payment_preimage, payment_hash, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), 3000000);
// Broadcast legit commitment tx from C on B's chain
let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_2.3);
- nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash, &None);
+ nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
// Get the will-be-revoked local txn from nodes[2]
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
// Revoke the old state
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage, 3_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage);
let (_, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3000000);
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), if no_to_remote { 1 } else { 2 });
// Revoke the old state
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage, if no_to_remote { 10_000 } else { 3_000_000});
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage);
let value = if use_dust {
// The dust limit applied to HTLC outputs considers the fee of the HTLC transaction as
let (_, second_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], value);
let (_, third_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], value);
- assert!(nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&first_payment_hash, &None));
+ assert!(nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&first_payment_hash));
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
let bs_raa = commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], updates.commitment_signed, false, true, false, true);
// Drop the last RAA from 3 -> 2
- assert!(nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&second_payment_hash, &None));
+ assert!(nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&second_payment_hash));
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
- assert!(nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&third_payment_hash, &None));
+ assert!(nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&third_payment_hash));
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
check_spends!(node_txn[0], tx);
}
+#[test]
+fn test_dup_events_on_peer_disconnect() {
+ // Test that if we receive a duplicative update_fulfill_htlc message after a reconnect we do
+ // not generate a corresponding duplicative PaymentSent event. This did not use to be the case
+ // as we used to generate the event immediately upon receipt of the payment preimage in the
+ // update_fulfill_htlc message.
+
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+
+ let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000).0;
+
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage));
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let claim_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &claim_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
+ expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
+
+ nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
+ nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
+
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
+}
+
#[test]
fn test_simple_peer_disconnect() {
// Test that we can reconnect when there are no lost messages
let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).0;
let payment_hash_2 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).1;
fail_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_hash_2);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_preimage_1, 1_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_preimage_1);
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
- claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], true, payment_preimage_3, 1_000_000);
+ claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], true, payment_preimage_3);
fail_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], true, payment_hash_5);
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 0), (false, false));
}
}
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_preimage_4, 1_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_preimage_4);
fail_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_hash_6);
}
let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
match events_2[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash);
- assert_eq!(Some(payment_secret_1), *payment_secret);
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(payment_secret_1, *payment_secret);
assert_eq!(amt, 1000000);
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
- nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1, &None, 1_000_000);
+ nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let events_3 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
if messages_delivered < 2 {
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
- //TODO: Deduplicate PaymentSent events, then enable this if:
- //if messages_delivered < 1 {
+ if messages_delivered < 1 {
let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
match events_4[0] {
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
- //}
+ } else {
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
+ }
} else if messages_delivered == 2 {
// nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, -1), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, true));
&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()),
&Vec::new(), 1000000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
let payment_preimage_2 = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 1000000).0;
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2, 1_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2);
}
#[test]
let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 1000000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
let (payment_preimage, _, _) = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage, 1_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage);
}
#[test]
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
- assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1, &None, 1_000_000));
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
let events_5 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events_5.len(), 1);
match events_5[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_secret, amt: _, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt: _, user_payment_id: _ } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2, *payment_hash);
- assert_eq!(Some(payment_secret_2), *payment_secret);
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(payment_secret_2, *payment_secret);
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2, 1_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2);
}
fn do_test_htlc_timeout(send_partial_mpp: bool) {
};
connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
- for _ in CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 2 ..TEST_FINAL_CLTV + CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 2 - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS {
+ let block_count = TEST_FINAL_CLTV + CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 2 - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS;
+ for _ in CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 2..block_count {
block.header.prev_blockhash = block.block_hash();
connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_timeout_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], htlc_timeout_updates.commitment_signed, false);
- // 100_000 msat as u64, followed by a height of TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 2 as u32
+ // 100_000 msat as u64, followed by the height at which we failed back above
let mut expected_failure_data = byte_utils::be64_to_array(100_000).to_vec();
- expected_failure_data.extend_from_slice(&byte_utils::be32_to_array(TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 2));
+ expected_failure_data.extend_from_slice(&byte_utils::be32_to_array(block_count - 1));
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, 0x4000 | 15, &expected_failure_data[..]);
}
node.net_graph_msg_handler.handle_channel_update(&bs_update).unwrap();
}
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000, 1_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload() {
+ // When a Channel is closed, any outbound HTLCs which were relayed through it are simply
+ // dropped when the Channel is. From there, the ChannelManager relies on the ChannelMonitor
+ // having a copy of the relevant fail-/claim-back data and processes the HTLC fail/claim when
+ // the ChannelMonitor tells it to.
+ //
+ // If, due to an on-chain event, an HTLC is failed/claimed, and then we serialize the
+ // ChannelManager, we generally expect there not to be a duplicate HTLC fail/claim (eg via a
+ // PaymentFailed event appearing). However, because we may not serialize the relevant
+ // ChannelMonitor at the same time, this isn't strictly guaranteed. In order to provide this
+ // consistency, the ChannelManager explicitly tracks pending-onchain-resolution outbound HTLCs
+ // and de-duplicates ChannelMonitor events.
+ //
+ // This tests that explicit tracking behavior.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let persister: test_utils::TestPersister;
+ let new_chain_monitor: test_utils::TestChainMonitor;
+ let nodes_0_deserialized: ChannelManager<EnforcingSigner, &test_utils::TestChainMonitor, &test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &test_utils::TestLogger>;
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+
+ // Route a payment, but force-close the channel before the HTLC fulfill message arrives at
+ // nodes[0].
+ let (payment_preimage, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 10000000);
+ nodes[0].node.force_close_channel(&nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].channel_id).unwrap();
+ check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
+ nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
+
+ let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
+ assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2);
+
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage));
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ let mut header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[1].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
+ connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![node_txn[0].clone(), node_txn[1].clone()]});
+ check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let claim_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
+
+ connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header, txdata: node_txn});
+
+ // Serialize out the ChannelMonitor before connecting the on-chain claim transactions. This is
+ // fairly normal behavior as ChannelMonitor(s) are often not re-serialized when on-chain events
+ // happen, unlike ChannelManager which tends to be re-serialized after any relevant event(s).
+ let mut chan_0_monitor_serialized = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
+ nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.read().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
+
+ header.prev_blockhash = header.block_hash();
+ let claim_block = Block { header, txdata: claim_txn};
+ connect_block(&nodes[0], &claim_block);
+ expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
+
+ // ChannelManagers generally get re-serialized after any relevant event(s). Since we just
+ // connected a highly-relevant block, it likely gets serialized out now.
+ let mut chan_manager_serialized = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
+ nodes[0].node.write(&mut chan_manager_serialized).unwrap();
+
+ // Now reload nodes[0]...
+ persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
+ let keys_manager = &chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager;
+ new_chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(nodes[0].chain_source), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), nodes[0].logger, node_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &persister, keys_manager);
+ nodes[0].chain_monitor = &new_chain_monitor;
+ let mut chan_0_monitor_read = &chan_0_monitor_serialized.0[..];
+ let (_, mut chan_0_monitor) = <(BlockHash, ChannelMonitor<EnforcingSigner>)>::read(
+ &mut chan_0_monitor_read, keys_manager).unwrap();
+ assert!(chan_0_monitor_read.is_empty());
+
+ let (_, nodes_0_deserialized_tmp) = {
+ let mut channel_monitors = HashMap::new();
+ channel_monitors.insert(chan_0_monitor.get_funding_txo().0, &mut chan_0_monitor);
+ <(BlockHash, ChannelManager<EnforcingSigner, &test_utils::TestChainMonitor, &test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &test_utils::TestLogger>)>
+ ::read(&mut std::io::Cursor::new(&chan_manager_serialized.0[..]), ChannelManagerReadArgs {
+ default_config: Default::default(),
+ keys_manager,
+ fee_estimator: node_cfgs[0].fee_estimator,
+ chain_monitor: nodes[0].chain_monitor,
+ tx_broadcaster: nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(),
+ logger: nodes[0].logger,
+ channel_monitors,
+ }).unwrap()
+ };
+ nodes_0_deserialized = nodes_0_deserialized_tmp;
+
+ assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.watch_channel(chan_0_monitor.get_funding_txo().0, chan_0_monitor).is_ok());
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ nodes[0].node = &nodes_0_deserialized;
+
+ // Note that if we re-connect the block which exposed nodes[0] to the payment preimage (but
+ // which the current ChannelMonitor has not seen), the ChannelManager's de-duplication of
+ // payment events should kick in, leaving us with no pending events here.
+ nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.block_connected(&claim_block, nodes[0].blocks.borrow().len() as u32 - 1);
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
}
#[test]
node.net_graph_msg_handler.handle_channel_update(&bs_update).unwrap();
}
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000, 1_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
}
#[test]
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
fail_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], our_payment_hash);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage, 1_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage);
}
#[test]
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[2], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
//... and we can even still claim the payment!
- claim_payment(&nodes[2], &[&nodes[0], &nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage, 1_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[2], &[&nodes[0], &nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage);
nodes[3].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty() });
let reestablish = get_event_msg!(nodes[3], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage, 3_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
assert_eq!(commitment_tx[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
// Settle A's commitment tx on B's chain
- assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage, &None, 3_000_000));
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx[0]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels ...
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3_000_000);
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage, 3_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage, 3_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
// A will generate HTLC-Timeout from revoked commitment tx
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
// The to-be-revoked commitment tx should have one HTLC and one to_remote output
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 2);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage, 3_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
// B will generate HTLC-Success from revoked commitment tx
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels ...
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
let (payment_preimage, _payment_hash, _payment_secret) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), 3000000);
let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_2.3);
- nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage, &None, 3_000_000);
+ nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
htlc_timeout_tx = node_txn[1].clone();
}
- nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage, &None, 900_000);
+ nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &commitment_txn[0]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 2);
let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
let htlc_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
assert!(htlc_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
assert_eq!(htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
- assert_eq!(htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0].htlc_id, 1);
+ let first_htlc_id = htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0].htlc_id;
assert!(htlc_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
assert!(htlc_updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
- assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0].htlc_id, 0);
+ assert_ne!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0].htlc_id, first_htlc_id);
assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
check_spends!(local_txn[0], chan_1.3);
// Give B knowledge of preimage to be able to generate a local HTLC-Success Tx
- nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage, &None, 9_000_000);
+ nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &local_txn[0]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 5, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Rebalance and check output sanity...
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 500000, 500_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]], 500000, 500_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 500000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]], 500000);
assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan.2)[0].output.len(), 2);
let ds_dust_limit = nodes[3].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
// Now fail back three of the over-dust-limit and three of the under-dust-limit payments in one go.
// Fail 0th below-dust, 4th above-dust, 8th above-dust, 10th below-dust HTLCs
- assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_1, &None));
- assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_3, &None));
- assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_5, &None));
- assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_6, &None));
+ assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_1));
+ assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_3));
+ assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_5));
+ assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_6));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 0);
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[4]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 1);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[3], nodes[4], four_removes.commitment_signed, false);
// Fail 3rd below-dust and 7th above-dust HTLCs
- assert!(nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_2, &None));
- assert!(nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_4, &None));
+ assert!(nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_2));
+ assert!(nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_4));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[5], 0);
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[5]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[5], 1);
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
let closing_tx = close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan.2, chan.3, true).2;
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &closing_tx);
// Claim the payment, but don't deliver A's commitment_signed, resulting in the HTLC only being
// present in B's local commitment transaction, but none of A's commitment transactions.
- assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage, &None, if use_dust { 50_000 } else { 3_000_000 }));
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let bs_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
// actually revoked.
let htlc_value = if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 };
let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], htlc_value);
- assert!(nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash, &None));
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash));
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.delayed_payment_basepoint.serialize()).is_ok());
}
+#[test]
+fn bolt2_open_channel_sane_dust_limit() {
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ let channel_value_satoshis=1000000;
+ let push_msat=10001;
+ nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).unwrap();
+ let mut node0_to_1_send_open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ node0_to_1_send_open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis = 661;
+ node0_to_1_send_open_channel.channel_reserve_satoshis = 100001;
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &node0_to_1_send_open_channel);
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ let err_msg = match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => {
+ msg.clone()
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+ assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "dust_limit_satoshis (661) is greater than the implementation limit (660)");
+}
+
// Test that if we fail to send an HTLC that is being freed from the holding cell, and the HTLC
// originated from our node, its failure is surfaced to the user. We trigger this failure to
// free the HTLC by increasing our fee while the HTLC is in the holding cell such that the HTLC
Event::PaymentReceived { .. } => {},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
- nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1, &None, amt_1);
+ nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let update_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
let max_in_flight = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan.2).counterparty_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat;
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], max_in_flight, max_in_flight);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], max_in_flight);
let (_, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[1]);
// Manually create a route over our max in flight (which our router normally automatically
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept".to_string(), 1);
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], max_in_flight, max_in_flight);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], max_in_flight);
}
// BOLT 2 Requirements for the Receiver when handling an update_add_htlc message.
let our_payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100000).0;
- nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage, &None, 100_000);
+ nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
let our_payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100000).0;
- nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage, &None, 100_000);
+ nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
let as_prev_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
// Fail one HTLC to prune it in the will-be-latest-local commitment tx
- assert!(nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_2, &None));
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_2));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
// We revoked bs_commitment_tx
if revoked {
let (payment_preimage_3, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_3, 1_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_3);
}
let mut timeout_tx = Vec::new();
let mut previous_chain_monitor_state = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.read().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write(&mut previous_chain_monitor_state).unwrap();
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
- let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
// Create some initial channels
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 10_000);
+ let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 10_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, nodes[0].logger).unwrap();
+ let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(our_payment_hash, Some(100_000), 7200, 0).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
+
+ // Note that we first have to wait a random delay before processing the receipt of the HTLC,
+ // and then will wait a second random delay before failing the HTLC back:
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
- // Node 3 is expecting payment of 100_000 but receive 10_000,
- // fail htlc like we didn't know the preimage.
- nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage, &None, 100_000);
+ // Node 3 is expecting payment of 100_000 but received 10_000,
+ // it should fail htlc like we didn't know the preimage.
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
// 10_000 msat as u64, followed by a height of CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH as u32
let mut expected_failure_data = byte_utils::be64_to_array(10_000).to_vec();
expected_failure_data.extend_from_slice(&byte_utils::be32_to_array(CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH));
- expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, true, 0x4000|15, &expected_failure_data[..]);
- nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, 0x4000|15, &expected_failure_data[..]);
}
#[test]
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
- nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred(); // dirty -> stagged
- nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred(); // staged -> fresh
+ nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred(); // Enabled -> DisabledStaged
+ nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred(); // DisabledStaged -> Disabled
let msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 3);
+ let mut chans_disabled: HashSet<u64> = [short_id_1, short_id_2, short_id_3].iter().map(|a| *a).collect();
for e in msg_events {
match e {
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
- let short_id = msg.contents.short_channel_id;
- // Check generated channel_update match list in PendingChannelUpdate
- if short_id != short_id_1 && short_id != short_id_2 && short_id != short_id_3 {
+ assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & (1<<1), 1<<1); // The "channel disabled" bit should be set
+ // Check that each channel gets updated exactly once
+ if !chans_disabled.remove(&msg.contents.short_channel_id) {
panic!("Generated ChannelUpdate for wrong chan!");
}
},
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
+ nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
+ let msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 3);
+ chans_disabled = [short_id_1, short_id_2, short_id_3].iter().map(|a| *a).collect();
+ for e in msg_events {
+ match e {
+ MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
+ assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & (1<<1), 0); // The "channel disabled" bit should be off
+ // Check that each channel gets updated exactly once
+ if !chans_disabled.remove(&msg.contents.short_channel_id) {
+ panic!("Generated ChannelUpdate for wrong chan!");
+ }
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ }
}
#[test]
let header_114 = connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 14);
// Actually revoke tx by claiming a HTLC
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage, 3_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: header_114, merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![revoked_txn[0].clone()] });
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- // Lock HTLC in both directions
- let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3_000_000).0;
- route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3_000_000).0;
+ // Lock HTLC in both directions (using a slightly lower CLTV delay to provide timely RBF bumps)
+ let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(),
+ &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 3_000_000, 50, nodes[0].logger).unwrap();
+ let payment_preimage = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
+ let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[1].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(),
+ &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 3_000_000, 50, nodes[0].logger).unwrap();
+ send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2);
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
// Revoke local commitment tx
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage, 3_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[1].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
// B will generate both revoked HTLC-timeout/HTLC-preimage txn from revoked commitment tx
assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
// Claim a HTLC without revocation (provide B monitor with preimage)
- nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage, &None, 3_000_000);
+ nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &remote_txn[0]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
// Revoke local commitment tx
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage, 9_000_000);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
// Broadcast set of revoked txn on A
- connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 52 - CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH);
+ connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 2 - CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH);
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[0]);
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 0);
route.paths[1][0].short_channel_id = chan_2_id;
route.paths[1][1].short_channel_id = chan_4_id;
send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[0], route, &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], 200_000, payment_hash, payment_secret);
- claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, payment_preimage, 200_000);
+ claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, payment_preimage);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_preimage_storage() {
+ // Simple test of payment preimage storage allowing no client-side storage to claim payments
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
+
+ {
+ let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 7200, 42);
+
+ let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler;
+ let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], 100_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
+ }
+ // Note that after leaving the above scope we have no knowledge of any arguments or return
+ // values from previous calls.
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match events[0] {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { payment_preimage, user_payment_id, .. } => {
+ assert_eq!(user_payment_id, 42);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage.unwrap());
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_secret_timeout() {
+ // Simple test of payment secret storage time outs
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
+
+ let (payment_hash, payment_secret_1) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2, 0);
+
+ // We should fail to register the same payment hash twice, at least until we've connected a
+ // block with time 7200 + CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1.
+ if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2, 0) {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Duplicate payment hash");
+ } else { panic!(); }
+ let mut block = Block {
+ header: BlockHeader {
+ version: 0x2000000,
+ prev_blockhash: nodes[1].blocks.borrow().last().unwrap().0.block_hash(),
+ merkle_root: Default::default(),
+ time: nodes[1].blocks.borrow().len() as u32 + 7200, bits: 42, nonce: 42 },
+ txdata: vec![],
+ };
+ connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
+ if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2, 0) {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Duplicate payment hash");
+ } else { panic!(); }
+
+ // If we then connect the second block, we should be able to register the same payment hash
+ // again with a different user_payment_id (this time getting a new payment secret).
+ block.header.prev_blockhash = block.header.block_hash();
+ block.header.time += 1;
+ connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
+ let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2, 42).unwrap();
+ assert_ne!(payment_secret_1, our_payment_secret);
+
+ {
+ let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler;
+ let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], 100_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
+ }
+ // Note that after leaving the above scope we have no knowledge of any arguments or return
+ // values from previous calls.
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match events[0] {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { payment_preimage, payment_secret, user_payment_id, .. } => {
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(user_payment_id, 42);
+ assert_eq!(payment_secret, our_payment_secret);
+ // We don't actually have the payment preimage with which to claim this payment!
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_bad_secret_hash() {
+ // Simple test of unregistered payment hash/invalid payment secret handling
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
+
+ let random_payment_hash = PaymentHash([42; 32]);
+ let random_payment_secret = PaymentSecret([43; 32]);
+ let (our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2, 0);
+
+ let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler;
+ let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], 100_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
+
+ // All the below cases should end up being handled exactly identically, so we macro the
+ // resulting events.
+ macro_rules! handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data {
+ () => {
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
+
+ // We have to forward pending HTLCs once to process the receipt of the HTLC and then
+ // again to process the pending backwards-failure of the HTLC
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ // We should fail the payment back
+ let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ match events.pop().unwrap() {
+ MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_fail_htlcs, commitment_signed, .. } } => {
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ let expected_error_code = 0x4000|15; // incorrect_or_unknown_payment_details
+ // Error data is the HTLC value (100,000) and current block height
+ let expected_error_data = [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0x86, 0xa0, 0, 0, 0, CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH as u8];
+
+ // Send a payment with the right payment hash but the wrong payment secret
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(random_payment_secret)).unwrap();
+ handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!();
+ expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
+
+ // Send a payment with a random payment hash, but the right payment secret
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, random_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)).unwrap();
+ handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!();
+ expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], random_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
+
+ // Send a payment with a random payment hash and random payment secret
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, random_payment_hash, &Some(random_payment_secret)).unwrap();
+ handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!();
+ expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], random_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
}
#[test]
let outpoint = OutPoint { txid: chan_1.3.txid(), index: 0 };
// Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 10_000_000, 10_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 10_000_000);
// Route a HTLC from node 0 to node 1 (but don't settle)
let preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9_000_000).0;
watchtower.chain_monitor.block_connected(&Block { header, txdata: vec![] }, 200);
// Try to update ChannelMonitor
- assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(preimage, &None, 9_000_000));
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(preimage));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
let outpoint = OutPoint { txid: chan_1.3.txid(), index: 0 };
// Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 10_000_000, 10_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 10_000_000);
// Route a HTLC from node 0 to node 1 (but don't settle)
route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9_000_000).0;
// Create some initial channels
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 1_000_000, 1_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 1_000_000);
let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 2_000_000);
let local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
assert_eq!(local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
// Step (5):
// Carol then claims the funds and sends an update_fulfill message to Bob, and they go through the
// process of removing the HTLC from their commitment transactions.
- assert!(nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage, &None, 3_000_000));
+ assert!(nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let carol_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
assert!(carol_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
let (funding_locked, _) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx);
let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_locked);
update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update);
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8000000);
}
#[test]
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff