{
let mut monitors = nodes[2].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap();
monitors.get_mut(&OutPoint{ txid: Txid::from_slice(&payment_event.commitment_msg.channel_id[..]).unwrap(), index: 0 }).unwrap()
- .provide_payment_preimage(&our_payment_hash, &our_payment_preimage);
+ .provide_payment_preimage(&our_payment_hash, &our_payment_preimage, &node_cfgs[2].tx_broadcaster, &node_cfgs[2].fee_estimator, &&logger);
}
connect_block(&nodes[2], &block, 1);
let node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
}
}
+#[test]
+fn test_pre_lockin_no_chan_closed_update() {
+ // Test that if a peer closes a channel in response to a funding_created message we don't
+ // generate a channel update (as the channel cannot appear on chain without a funding_signed
+ // message).
+ //
+ // Doing so would imply a channel monitor update before the initial channel monitor
+ // registration, violating our API guarantees.
+ //
+ // Previously, full_stack_target managed to hit this case by opening then closing a channel,
+ // then opening a second channel with the same funding output as the first (which is not
+ // rejected because the first channel does not exist in the ChannelManager) and closing it
+ // before receiving funding_signed.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ // Create an initial channel
+ nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+ let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_msg);
+ let accept_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &accept_chan_msg);
+
+ // Move the first channel through the funding flow...
+ let (temporary_channel_id, _tx, funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], 100000, 42);
+
+ nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, funding_output);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
+
+ let funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ let channel_id = ::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index }.to_channel_id();
+ nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id, data: "Hi".to_owned() });
+ assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+}
+
#[test]
fn test_htlc_no_detection() {
// This test is a mutation to underscore the detection logic bug we had
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1, 201, true, header_201.block_hash());
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true);
}
+
+fn do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(broadcast_alice: bool, go_onchain_before_fulfill: bool) {
+ // If we route an HTLC, then learn the HTLC's preimage after the upstream channel has been
+ // force-closed, we must claim that HTLC on-chain. (Given an HTLC forwarded from Alice --> Bob -->
+ // Carol, Alice would be the upstream node, and Carol the downstream.)
+ //
+ // Steps of the test:
+ // 1) Alice sends a HTLC to Carol through Bob.
+ // 2) Carol doesn't settle the HTLC.
+ // 3) If broadcast_alice is true, Alice force-closes her channel with Bob. Else Bob force closes.
+ // Steps 4 and 5 may be reordered depending on go_onchain_before_fulfill.
+ // 4) Bob sees the Alice's commitment on his chain or vice versa. An offered output is present
+ // but can't be claimed as Bob doesn't have yet knowledge of the preimage.
+ // 5) Carol release the preimage to Bob off-chain.
+ // 6) Bob claims the offered output on the broadcasted commitment.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ // Create some initial channels
+ let chan_ab = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 100000, 10001, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+
+ // Steps (1) and (2):
+ // Send an HTLC Alice --> Bob --> Carol, but Carol doesn't settle the HTLC back.
+ let (payment_preimage, _payment_hash) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), 3_000_000);
+
+ // Check that Alice's commitment transaction now contains an output for this HTLC.
+ let alice_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_ab.2);
+ check_spends!(alice_txn[0], chan_ab.3);
+ assert_eq!(alice_txn[0].output.len(), 2);
+ check_spends!(alice_txn[1], alice_txn[0]); // 2nd transaction is a non-final HTLC-timeout
+ assert_eq!(alice_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
+ assert_eq!(alice_txn.len(), 2);
+
+ // Steps (3) and (4):
+ // If `go_onchain_before_fufill`, broadcast the relevant commitment transaction and check that Bob
+ // responds by (1) broadcasting a channel update and (2) adding a new ChannelMonitor.
+ let mut force_closing_node = 0; // Alice force-closes
+ if !broadcast_alice { force_closing_node = 1; } // Bob force-closes
+ nodes[force_closing_node].node.force_close_channel(&chan_ab.2);
+ check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[force_closing_node], false);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[force_closing_node], 1);
+ if go_onchain_before_fulfill {
+ let txn_to_broadcast = match broadcast_alice {
+ true => alice_txn.clone(),
+ false => get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_ab.2)
+ };
+ let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: Default::default(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42};
+ connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![txn_to_broadcast[0].clone()]}, 1);
+ let mut bob_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+ if broadcast_alice {
+ check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], false);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ }
+ assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 1);
+ check_spends!(bob_txn[0], chan_ab.3);
+ }
+
+ // Step (5):
+ // Carol then claims the funds and sends an update_fulfill message to Bob, and they go through the
+ // process of removing the HTLC from their commitment transactions.
+ assert!(nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage, &None, 3_000_000));
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+ let carol_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ assert!(carol_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(carol_updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(carol_updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(carol_updates.update_fee.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(carol_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
+ // If Alice broadcasted but Bob doesn't know yet, here he prepares to tell her about the preimage.
+ if !go_onchain_before_fulfill && broadcast_alice {
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, .. } => {
+ assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+ }
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_updates.commitment_signed);
+ // One monitor update for the preimage to update the Bob<->Alice channel, one monitor update
+ // Carol<->Bob's updated commitment transaction info.
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
+
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
+ let bob_revocation = match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
+ assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+ (*msg).clone()
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+ let bob_updates = match events[1] {
+ MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, ref updates } => {
+ assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+ (*updates).clone()
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+
+ nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_revocation);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+ nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_updates.commitment_signed);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+
+ let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let carol_revocation = match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
+ assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ (*msg).clone()
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_revocation);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ // If this test requires the force-closed channel to not be on-chain until after the fulfill,
+ // here's where we put said channel's commitment tx on-chain.
+ let mut txn_to_broadcast = alice_txn.clone();
+ if !broadcast_alice { txn_to_broadcast = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_ab.2); }
+ if !go_onchain_before_fulfill {
+ let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: Default::default(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42};
+ connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![txn_to_broadcast[0].clone()]}, 1);
+ // If Bob was the one to force-close, he will have already passed these checks earlier.
+ if broadcast_alice {
+ check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], false);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ }
+ let mut bob_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+ if broadcast_alice {
+ // In `connect_block()`, the ChainMonitor and ChannelManager are separately notified about a
+ // new block being connected. The ChannelManager being notified triggers a monitor update,
+ // which triggers broadcasting our commitment tx and an HTLC-claiming tx. The ChainMonitor
+ // being notified triggers the HTLC-claiming tx redundantly, resulting in 3 total txs being
+ // broadcasted.
+ assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 3);
+ check_spends!(bob_txn[1], chan_ab.3);
+ } else {
+ assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 2);
+ check_spends!(bob_txn[0], chan_ab.3);
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Step (6):
+ // Finally, check that Bob broadcasted a preimage-claiming transaction for the HTLC output on the
+ // broadcasted commitment transaction.
+ {
+ let bob_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
+ if go_onchain_before_fulfill {
+ // Bob should now have an extra broadcasted tx, for the preimage-claiming transaction.
+ assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 2);
+ }
+ let script_weight = match broadcast_alice {
+ true => OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT,
+ false => ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT
+ };
+ // If Alice force-closed and Bob didn't receive her commitment transaction until after he
+ // received Carol's fulfill, he broadcasts the HTLC-output-claiming transaction first. Else if
+ // Bob force closed or if he found out about Alice's commitment tx before receiving Carol's
+ // fulfill, then he broadcasts the HTLC-output-claiming transaction second.
+ if broadcast_alice && !go_onchain_before_fulfill {
+ check_spends!(bob_txn[0], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
+ assert_eq!(bob_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), script_weight);
+ } else {
+ check_spends!(bob_txn[1], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
+ assert_eq!(bob_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), script_weight);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close() {
+ do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(true, true);
+ do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(false, true); // Technically redundant, but may as well
+ do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(true, false);
+ do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(false, false);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_duplicate_chan_id() {
+ // Test that if a given peer tries to open a channel with the same channel_id as one that is
+ // already open we reject it and keep the old channel.
+ //
+ // Previously, full_stack_target managed to figure out that if you tried to open two channels
+ // with the same funding output (ie post-funding channel_id), we'd create a monitor update for
+ // the existing channel when we detect the duplicate new channel, screwing up our monitor
+ // updating logic for the existing channel.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ // Create an initial channel
+ nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+ let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_msg);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
+
+ // Try to create a second channel with the same temporary_channel_id as the first and check
+ // that it is rejected.
+ nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_msg);
+ {
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
+ // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both the
+ // first (valid) and second (invalid) channels are closed, given they both have
+ // the same non-temporary channel_id. However, currently we do not, so we just
+ // move forward with it.
+ assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id);
+ assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Move the first channel through the funding flow...
+ let (temporary_channel_id, tx, funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], 100000, 42);
+
+ nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, funding_output);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
+
+ let mut funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msg);
+ {
+ let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
+ added_monitors.clear();
+ }
+ let funding_signed_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ let funding_outpoint = ::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index };
+ let channel_id = funding_outpoint.to_channel_id();
+
+ // Now we have the first channel past funding_created (ie it has a txid-based channel_id, not a
+ // temporary one).
+
+ // First try to open a second channel with a temporary channel id equal to the txid-based one.
+ // Technically this is allowed by the spec, but we don't support it and there's little reason
+ // to. Still, it shouldn't cause any other issues.
+ open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id = channel_id;
+ nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_msg);
+ {
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
+ // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both
+ // channels are closed, but currently we do not, so we just move forward with it.
+ assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id);
+ assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Now try to create a second channel which has a duplicate funding output.
+ nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+ let open_chan_2_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_2_msg);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
+ create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], 100000, 42); // Get and check the FundingGenerationReady event
+
+ let funding_created = {
+ let mut a_channel_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
+ let mut as_chan = a_channel_lock.by_id.get_mut(&open_chan_2_msg.temporary_channel_id).unwrap();
+ let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+ as_chan.get_outbound_funding_created(funding_outpoint, &&logger).unwrap()
+ };
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created);
+ // At this point we'll try to add a duplicate channel monitor, which will be rejected, but
+ // still needs to be cleared here.
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ // ...still, nodes[1] will reject the duplicate channel.
+ {
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
+ // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both
+ // channels are closed, but currently we do not, so we just move forward with it.
+ assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, channel_id);
+ assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ }
+
+ // finally, finish creating the original channel and send a payment over it to make sure
+ // everything is functional.
+ nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed_msg);
+ {
+ let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
+ added_monitors.clear();
+ }
+
+ let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
+ match events_4[0] {
+ Event::FundingBroadcastSafe { ref funding_txo, user_channel_id } => {
+ assert_eq!(user_channel_id, 42);
+ assert_eq!(*funding_txo, funding_output);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+
+ let (funding_locked, _) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx);
+ let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_locked);
+ update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+}
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff