use chain::keysinterface::BaseSign;
use ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash};
use ln::channel::{COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC};
-use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
+use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, MppId, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
use ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError};
use ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils};
use ln::chan_utils::HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT;
use routing::router::{Route, RouteHop, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, get_route, get_keysend_route};
-use routing::network_graph::RoutingFees;
+use routing::network_graph::{NetworkUpdate, RoutingFees};
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs;
-use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler,RoutingMessageHandler,HTLCFailChannelUpdate, ErrorAction};
+use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, RoutingMessageHandler, ErrorAction};
use util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingSigner;
use util::{byte_utils, test_utils};
use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PaymentPurpose};
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_fail_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], bs_fail_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
- expect_payment_failure_chan_update!(nodes[0], chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
- expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash_2, false);
+ expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash_2, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
// Now forward all the pending HTLCs and claim them back
nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &initial_payment_event.msgs[0]);
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[0]);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false, true);
- expect_payment_failure_chan_update!(nodes[0], chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, true);
- expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false);
+ expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, true);
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false, true);
- let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
- // If we delivered B's RAA we got an unknown preimage error, not something
- // that we should update our routing table for.
- assert_eq!(events.len(), if deliver_bs_raa { 2 } else { 3 });
- for event in events {
- match event {
- MessageSendEvent::PaymentFailureNetworkUpdate { .. } => {},
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
- }
- }
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, rejected_by_dest: _, ref network_update, .. } => {
assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
+ // If we delivered B's RAA we got an unknown preimage error, not something
+ // that we should update our routing table for.
+ if !deliver_bs_raa {
+ assert!(network_update.is_some());
+ }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
match events[1] {
- Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, rejected_by_dest: _, ref network_update, .. } => {
assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
+ assert!(network_update.is_some());
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
match events[2] {
- Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, rejected_by_dest: _, ref network_update, .. } => {
assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
+ assert!(network_update.is_some());
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], true, payment_preimage_3);
- fail_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], true, payment_hash_5);
+ fail_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], true, payment_hash_5);
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 0), (false, false));
{
// Use the utility function send_payment_along_path to send the payment with MPP data which
// indicates there are more HTLCs coming.
let cur_height = CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1; // route_payment calls send_payment, which adds 1 to the current height. So we do the same here to match.
- nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &our_payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), 200000, cur_height, &None).unwrap();
+ let mpp_id = MppId([42; 32]);
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &our_payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), 200000, cur_height, mpp_id, &None).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
},
_ => unreachable!(),
}
- expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], second_payment_hash, false);
- expect_payment_failure_chan_update!(nodes[0], chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
+ expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], second_payment_hash, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
} else {
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], second_payment_hash, true);
}
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
}
+#[test]
+fn mpp_failure() {
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ let chan_1_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
+ let chan_2_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
+ let chan_3_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
+ let chan_4_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
+ let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+
+ let (_, payment_hash, payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[3]);
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler;
+ let mut route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
+ let path = route.paths[0].clone();
+ route.paths.push(path);
+ route.paths[0][0].pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
+ route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id = chan_1_id;
+ route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id = chan_3_id;
+ route.paths[1][0].pubkey = nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id();
+ route.paths[1][0].short_channel_id = chan_2_id;
+ route.paths[1][1].short_channel_id = chan_4_id;
+ send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[0], route, &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], 200_000, payment_hash, payment_secret);
+ fail_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, payment_hash);
+}
+
#[test]
fn test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload() {
// When a Channel is closed, any outbound HTLCs which were relayed through it are simply
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
{
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], &htlc_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
- expect_payment_failure_chan_update!(nodes[0], chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, true);
}
- expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], duplicate_payment_hash, false);
+ expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], duplicate_payment_hash, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, true);
// Solve 2nd HTLC by broadcasting on B's chain HTLC-Success Tx from C
// Note that the fee paid is effectively double as the HTLC value (including the nodes[1] fee
let as_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(as_events.len(), if announce_latest { 5 } else { 3 });
let mut as_failds = HashSet::new();
+ let mut as_updates = 0;
for event in as_events.iter() {
- if let &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, .. } = event {
+ if let &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, .. } = event {
assert!(as_failds.insert(*payment_hash));
if *payment_hash != payment_hash_2 {
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, deliver_last_raa);
} else {
assert!(!rejected_by_dest);
}
+ if network_update.is_some() {
+ as_updates += 1;
+ }
} else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
}
assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_1));
let bs_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(bs_events.len(), if announce_latest { 4 } else { 3 });
let mut bs_failds = HashSet::new();
+ let mut bs_updates = 0;
for event in bs_events.iter() {
- if let &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, .. } = event {
+ if let &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, .. } = event {
assert!(bs_failds.insert(*payment_hash));
if *payment_hash != payment_hash_1 && *payment_hash != payment_hash_5 {
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, deliver_last_raa);
} else {
assert!(!rejected_by_dest);
}
+ if network_update.is_some() {
+ bs_updates += 1;
+ }
} else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
}
assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_1));
assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_5));
// For each HTLC which was not failed-back by normal process (ie deliver_last_raa), we should
- // get a PaymentFailureNetworkUpdate. A should have gotten 4 HTLCs which were failed-back due
- // to unknown-preimage-etc, B should have gotten 2. Thus, in the
- // announce_latest && deliver_last_raa case, we should have 5-4=1 and 4-2=2
- // PaymentFailureNetworkUpdates.
- let as_msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
- assert_eq!(as_msg_events.len(), if deliver_last_raa { 1 } else if !announce_latest { 3 } else { 5 });
- let bs_msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
- assert_eq!(bs_msg_events.len(), if deliver_last_raa { 2 } else if !announce_latest { 3 } else { 4 });
- for event in as_msg_events.iter().chain(bs_msg_events.iter()) {
- match event {
- &MessageSendEvent::PaymentFailureNetworkUpdate { .. } => {},
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
- }
- }
+ // get a NetworkUpdate. A should have gotten 4 HTLCs which were failed-back due to
+ // unknown-preimage-etc, B should have gotten 2. Thus, in the
+ // announce_latest && deliver_last_raa case, we should have 5-4=1 and 4-2=2 NetworkUpdates.
+ assert_eq!(as_updates, if deliver_last_raa { 1 } else if !announce_latest { 3 } else { 5 });
+ assert_eq!(bs_updates, if deliver_last_raa { 2 } else if !announce_latest { 3 } else { 4 });
}
#[test]
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
- &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
+ &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed } => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
+ assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
+ assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
- &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
+ &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
+ assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
+ assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
};
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
- expect_payment_failure_chan_update!(nodes[0], chan_1_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
- expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false);
+ expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false, chan_1_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
}
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_fail_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], htlc_fail_updates.commitment_signed, true, true);
- expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false);
- expect_payment_failure_chan_update!(nodes[0], nodes[2].node.list_channels()[0].short_channel_id.unwrap(), true);
+ expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false, nodes[2].node.list_channels()[0].short_channel_id.unwrap(), true);
// Now disconnect nodes[1] from its peers and restart with accept_forwards_to_priv_channels set
// to true. Sadly there is currently no way to change it at runtime.
assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], updates.commitment_signed, true, true);
- expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false);
- expect_payment_failure_chan_update!(nodes[0], chan_announce.contents.short_channel_id, true);
+ expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false, chan_announce.contents.short_channel_id, true);
}
}
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff