Use Writeable for ChannelMonitor instead of a specific function.
[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / ln / functional_tests.rs
index b3e5697c66834c268b12cc1da97a7653f58c3e51..98b166285a3991ee13b1d131eee3fdda9916c297 100644 (file)
@@ -32,13 +32,12 @@ use util::ser::{Writeable, ReadableArgs, Readable};
 use util::config::UserConfig;
 
 use bitcoin::hashes::sha256d::Hash as Sha256dHash;
-use bitcoin::hashes::HashEngine;
-use bitcoin::hash_types::{Txid, BlockHash, WPubkeyHash};
+use bitcoin::hash_types::{Txid, BlockHash};
 use bitcoin::util::bip143;
 use bitcoin::util::address::Address;
 use bitcoin::util::bip32::{ChildNumber, ExtendedPubKey, ExtendedPrivKey};
 use bitcoin::blockdata::block::{Block, BlockHeader};
-use bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::{Transaction, TxOut, TxIn, SigHashType, OutPoint as BitcoinOutPoint};
+use bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::{Transaction, TxOut, TxIn, SigHashType};
 use bitcoin::blockdata::script::{Builder, Script};
 use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes;
 use bitcoin::blockdata::constants::genesis_block;
@@ -59,7 +58,7 @@ use std::sync::atomic::Ordering;
 use std::mem;
 
 use ln::functional_test_utils::*;
-use ln::chan_utils::PreCalculatedTxCreationKeys;
+use ln::chan_utils::CommitmentTransaction;
 
 #[test]
 fn test_insane_channel_opens() {
@@ -1617,20 +1616,20 @@ fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() {
 
        // Get the EnforcingChannelKeys for each channel, which will be used to (1) get the keys
        // needed to sign the new commitment tx and (2) sign the new commitment tx.
-       let (local_revocation_basepoint, local_htlc_basepoint, local_payment_point, local_secret, local_secret2) = {
+       let (local_revocation_basepoint, local_htlc_basepoint, local_secret, local_secret2) = {
                let chan_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
                let local_chan = chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
                let chan_keys = local_chan.get_keys();
                let pubkeys = chan_keys.pubkeys();
-               (pubkeys.revocation_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint, pubkeys.payment_point,
+               (pubkeys.revocation_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
                 chan_keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER), chan_keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2))
        };
-       let (remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, remote_htlc_basepoint, remote_payment_point, remote_secret1) = {
+       let (remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, remote_htlc_basepoint, remote_secret1) = {
                let chan_lock = nodes[1].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
                let remote_chan = chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
                let chan_keys = remote_chan.get_keys();
                let pubkeys = chan_keys.pubkeys();
-               (pubkeys.delayed_payment_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint, pubkeys.payment_point,
+               (pubkeys.delayed_payment_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
                 chan_keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1))
        };
 
@@ -1643,70 +1642,31 @@ fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() {
        // Build the remote commitment transaction so we can sign it, and then later use the
        // signature for the commitment_signed message.
        let local_chan_balance = 1313;
-       let static_payment_pk = local_payment_point.serialize();
-       let remote_commit_tx_output = TxOut {
-                               script_pubkey: Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_PUSHBYTES_0)
-                                                            .push_slice(&WPubkeyHash::hash(&static_payment_pk)[..])
-                                                            .into_script(),
-               value: local_chan_balance as u64
-       };
-
-       let local_commit_tx_output = TxOut {
-               script_pubkey: chan_utils::get_revokeable_redeemscript(&commit_tx_keys.revocation_key,
-                                                                              BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT,
-                                                                              &commit_tx_keys.broadcaster_delayed_payment_key).to_v0_p2wsh(),
-                               value: 95000,
-       };
 
        let accepted_htlc_info = chan_utils::HTLCOutputInCommitment {
                offered: false,
                amount_msat: 3460001,
                cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
-               payment_hash: payment_hash,
+               payment_hash,
                transaction_output_index: Some(1),
        };
 
-       let htlc_output = TxOut {
-               script_pubkey: chan_utils::get_htlc_redeemscript(&accepted_htlc_info, &commit_tx_keys).to_v0_p2wsh(),
-               value: 3460001 / 1000
-       };
+       let commitment_number = INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1;
 
-       let commit_tx_obscure_factor = {
-               let mut sha = Sha256::engine();
-               let remote_payment_point = &remote_payment_point.serialize();
-               sha.input(&local_payment_point.serialize());
-               sha.input(remote_payment_point);
-               let res = Sha256::from_engine(sha).into_inner();
-
-               ((res[26] as u64) << 5*8) |
-               ((res[27] as u64) << 4*8) |
-               ((res[28] as u64) << 3*8) |
-               ((res[29] as u64) << 2*8) |
-               ((res[30] as u64) << 1*8) |
-               ((res[31] as u64) << 0*8)
-       };
-       let commitment_number = 1;
-       let obscured_commitment_transaction_number = commit_tx_obscure_factor ^ commitment_number;
-       let lock_time = ((0x20 as u32) << 8*3) | ((obscured_commitment_transaction_number & 0xffffffu64) as u32);
-       let input = TxIn {
-               previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint { txid: chan.3.txid(), vout: 0 },
-               script_sig: Script::new(),
-               sequence: ((0x80 as u32) << 8*3) | ((obscured_commitment_transaction_number >> 3*8) as u32),
-               witness: Vec::new(),
-       };
-
-       let commit_tx = Transaction {
-               version: 2,
-               lock_time,
-               input: vec![input],
-               output: vec![remote_commit_tx_output, htlc_output, local_commit_tx_output],
-       };
        let res = {
                let local_chan_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
                let local_chan = local_chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
                let local_chan_keys = local_chan.get_keys();
-               let pre_commit_tx_keys = PreCalculatedTxCreationKeys::new(commit_tx_keys);
-               local_chan_keys.sign_counterparty_commitment(feerate_per_kw, &commit_tx, &pre_commit_tx_keys, &[&accepted_htlc_info], &secp_ctx).unwrap()
+               let commitment_tx = CommitmentTransaction::new_with_auxiliary_htlc_data(
+                       commitment_number,
+                       95000,
+                       local_chan_balance,
+                       commit_tx_keys.clone(),
+                       feerate_per_kw,
+                       &mut vec![(accepted_htlc_info, ())],
+                       &local_chan.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable()
+               );
+               local_chan_keys.sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, &secp_ctx).unwrap()
        };
 
        let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned {
@@ -4319,7 +4279,7 @@ fn test_no_txn_manager_serialize_deserialize() {
 
        let nodes_0_serialized = nodes[0].node.encode();
        let mut chan_0_monitor_serialized = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.serialize_for_disk(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
 
        logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
        fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 };
@@ -4428,7 +4388,7 @@ fn test_manager_serialize_deserialize_events() {
        // Start the de/seriailization process mid-channel creation to check that the channel manager will hold onto events that are serialized
        let nodes_0_serialized = nodes[0].node.encode();
        let mut chan_0_monitor_serialized = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.serialize_for_disk(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
 
        fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 };
        logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
@@ -4520,7 +4480,7 @@ fn test_simple_manager_serialize_deserialize() {
 
        let nodes_0_serialized = nodes[0].node.encode();
        let mut chan_0_monitor_serialized = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.serialize_for_disk(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
 
        logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
        fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 };
@@ -4579,7 +4539,7 @@ fn test_manager_serialize_deserialize_inconsistent_monitor() {
        let mut node_0_stale_monitors_serialized = Vec::new();
        for monitor in nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter() {
                let mut writer = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-               monitor.1.serialize_for_disk(&mut writer).unwrap();
+               monitor.1.write(&mut writer).unwrap();
                node_0_stale_monitors_serialized.push(writer.0);
        }
 
@@ -4598,7 +4558,7 @@ fn test_manager_serialize_deserialize_inconsistent_monitor() {
        let mut node_0_monitors_serialized = Vec::new();
        for monitor in nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter() {
                let mut writer = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-               monitor.1.serialize_for_disk(&mut writer).unwrap();
+               monitor.1.write(&mut writer).unwrap();
                node_0_monitors_serialized.push(writer.0);
        }
 
@@ -7432,7 +7392,7 @@ fn test_data_loss_protect() {
        // Cache node A state before any channel update
        let previous_node_state = nodes[0].node.encode();
        let mut previous_chain_monitor_state = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.serialize_for_disk(&mut previous_chain_monitor_state).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write(&mut previous_chain_monitor_state).unwrap();
 
        send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
        send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
@@ -8314,7 +8274,7 @@ fn test_update_err_monitor_lockdown() {
                let monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap();
                let monitor = monitors.get(&outpoint).unwrap();
                let mut w = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-               monitor.serialize_for_disk(&mut w).unwrap();
+               monitor.write(&mut w).unwrap();
                let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<EnforcingChannelKeys>)>::read(
                                &mut ::std::io::Cursor::new(&w.0)).unwrap().1;
                assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
@@ -8373,7 +8333,7 @@ fn test_concurrent_monitor_claim() {
                let monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap();
                let monitor = monitors.get(&outpoint).unwrap();
                let mut w = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-               monitor.serialize_for_disk(&mut w).unwrap();
+               monitor.write(&mut w).unwrap();
                let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<EnforcingChannelKeys>)>::read(
                                &mut ::std::io::Cursor::new(&w.0)).unwrap().1;
                assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
@@ -8399,7 +8359,7 @@ fn test_concurrent_monitor_claim() {
                let monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap();
                let monitor = monitors.get(&outpoint).unwrap();
                let mut w = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-               monitor.serialize_for_disk(&mut w).unwrap();
+               monitor.write(&mut w).unwrap();
                let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<EnforcingChannelKeys>)>::read(
                                &mut ::std::io::Cursor::new(&w.0)).unwrap().1;
                assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
@@ -8457,6 +8417,43 @@ fn test_concurrent_monitor_claim() {
        }
 }
 
+#[test]
+fn test_pre_lockin_no_chan_closed_update() {
+       // Test that if a peer closes a channel in response to a funding_created message we don't
+       // generate a channel update (as the channel cannot appear on chain without a funding_signed
+       // message).
+       //
+       // Doing so would imply a channel monitor update before the initial channel monitor
+       // registration, violating our API guarantees.
+       //
+       // Previously, full_stack_target managed to hit this case by opening then closing a channel,
+       // then opening a second channel with the same funding output as the first (which is not
+       // rejected because the first channel does not exist in the ChannelManager) and closing it
+       // before receiving funding_signed.
+       let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+       let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+       let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+       let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+       // Create an initial channel
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+       let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_msg);
+       let accept_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &accept_chan_msg);
+
+       // Move the first channel through the funding flow...
+       let (temporary_channel_id, _tx, funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], 100000, 42);
+
+       nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, funding_output);
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
+
+       let funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       let channel_id = ::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index }.to_channel_id();
+       nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id, data: "Hi".to_owned() });
+       assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+}
+
 #[test]
 fn test_htlc_no_detection() {
        // This test is a mutation to underscore the detection logic bug we had
@@ -8687,3 +8684,143 @@ fn test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close() {
        do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(true, false);
        do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(false, false);
 }
+
+#[test]
+fn test_duplicate_chan_id() {
+       // Test that if a given peer tries to open a channel with the same channel_id as one that is
+       // already open we reject it and keep the old channel.
+       //
+       // Previously, full_stack_target managed to figure out that if you tried to open two channels
+       // with the same funding output (ie post-funding channel_id), we'd create a monitor update for
+       // the existing channel when we detect the duplicate new channel, screwing up our monitor
+       // updating logic for the existing channel.
+       let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+       let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+       let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+       let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+       // Create an initial channel
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+       let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_msg);
+       nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
+
+       // Try to create a second channel with the same temporary_channel_id as the first and check
+       // that it is rejected.
+       nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_msg);
+       {
+               let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+               assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+               match events[0] {
+                       MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
+                               // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both the
+                               // first (valid) and second (invalid) channels are closed, given they both have
+                               // the same non-temporary channel_id. However, currently we do not, so we just
+                               // move forward with it.
+                               assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id);
+                               assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+                       },
+                       _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+               }
+       }
+
+       // Move the first channel through the funding flow...
+       let (temporary_channel_id, tx, funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], 100000, 42);
+
+       nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, funding_output);
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
+
+       let mut funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msg);
+       {
+               let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
+               assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
+               assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
+               added_monitors.clear();
+       }
+       let funding_signed_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+       let funding_outpoint = ::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index };
+       let channel_id = funding_outpoint.to_channel_id();
+
+       // Now we have the first channel past funding_created (ie it has a txid-based channel_id, not a
+       // temporary one).
+
+       // First try to open a second channel with a temporary channel id equal to the txid-based one.
+       // Technically this is allowed by the spec, but we don't support it and there's little reason
+       // to. Still, it shouldn't cause any other issues.
+       open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id = channel_id;
+       nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_msg);
+       {
+               let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+               assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+               match events[0] {
+                       MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
+                               // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both
+                               // channels are closed, but currently we do not, so we just move forward with it.
+                               assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id);
+                               assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+                       },
+                       _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+               }
+       }
+
+       // Now try to create a second channel which has a duplicate funding output.
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+       let open_chan_2_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_2_msg);
+       nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
+       create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], 100000, 42); // Get and check the FundingGenerationReady event
+
+       let funding_created = {
+               let mut a_channel_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
+               let mut as_chan = a_channel_lock.by_id.get_mut(&open_chan_2_msg.temporary_channel_id).unwrap();
+               let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+               as_chan.get_outbound_funding_created(funding_outpoint, &&logger).unwrap()
+       };
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
+       nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created);
+       // At this point we'll try to add a duplicate channel monitor, which will be rejected, but
+       // still needs to be cleared here.
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+       // ...still, nodes[1] will reject the duplicate channel.
+       {
+               let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+               assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+               match events[0] {
+                       MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
+                               // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both
+                               // channels are closed, but currently we do not, so we just move forward with it.
+                               assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, channel_id);
+                               assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+                       },
+                       _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+               }
+       }
+
+       // finally, finish creating the original channel and send a payment over it to make sure
+       // everything is functional.
+       nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed_msg);
+       {
+               let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
+               assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
+               assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
+               added_monitors.clear();
+       }
+
+       let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+       assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
+       match events_4[0] {
+               Event::FundingBroadcastSafe { ref funding_txo, user_channel_id } => {
+                       assert_eq!(user_channel_id, 42);
+                       assert_eq!(*funding_txo, funding_output);
+               },
+               _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+       };
+
+       let (funding_locked, _) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx);
+       let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_locked);
+       update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update);
+       send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+}