} else { assert!(false); }
}
-#[test]
-fn test_data_loss_protect() {
- // We want to be sure that :
- // * we don't broadcast our Local Commitment Tx in case of fallen behind
- // (but this is not quite true - we broadcast during Drop because chanmon is out of sync with chanmgr)
- // * we close channel in case of detecting other being fallen behind
- // * we are able to claim our own outputs thanks to to_remote being static
- // TODO: this test is incomplete and the data_loss_protect implementation is incomplete - see issue #775
+fn do_test_data_loss_protect(reconnect_panicing: bool) {
+ // When we get a data_loss_protect proving we're behind, we immediately panic as the
+ // chain::Watch API requirements have been violated (e.g. the user restored from a backup). The
+ // panic message informs the user they should force-close without broadcasting, which is tested
+ // if `reconnect_panicing` is not set.
let persister;
let logger;
let fee_estimator;
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
- nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty(), remote_network_address: None });
- nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty(), remote_network_address: None });
+ if reconnect_panicing {
+ nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty(), remote_network_address: None });
+ nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty(), remote_network_address: None });
- let reestablish_0 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
+ let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
- // Check we don't broadcast any transactions following learning of per_commitment_point from B
- nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_0[0]);
- check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ // Check we close channel detecting A is fallen-behind
+ // Check that we sent the warning message when we detected that A has fallen behind,
+ // and give the possibility for A to recover from the warning.
+ nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[0]);
+ let warn_msg = "Peer attempted to reestablish channel with a very old local commitment transaction".to_owned();
+ assert!(check_warn_msg!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), chan.2).contains(&warn_msg));
+
+ {
+ let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
+ // The node B should not broadcast the transaction to force close the channel!
+ assert!(node_txn.is_empty());
+ }
+
+ let reestablish_0 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
+ // Check A panics upon seeing proof it has fallen behind.
+ nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_0[0]);
+ return; // By this point we should have panic'ed!
+ }
+ nodes[0].node.force_close_without_broadcasting_txn(&chan.2, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
{
- let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
+ let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 0);
}
- let mut reestablish_1 = Vec::with_capacity(1);
for msg in nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events() {
- if let MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish { ref node_id, ref msg } = msg {
- assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
- reestablish_1.push(msg.clone());
- } else if let MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } = msg {
+ if let MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } = msg {
} else if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref action, .. } = msg {
match action {
&ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg } => {
- assert_eq!(msg.data, "We have fallen behind - we have received proof that if we broadcast remote is going to claim our funds - we can't do any automated broadcasting");
+ assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel force-closed");
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event!"),
}
} else {
- panic!("Unexpected event")
+ panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", msg)
}
}
- // Check we close channel detecting A is fallen-behind
- // Check that we sent the warning message when we detected that A has fallen behind,
- // and give the possibility for A to recover from the warning.
- nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[0]);
- let warn_msg = "Peer attempted to reestablish channel with a very old local commitment transaction".to_owned();
- assert!(check_warn_msg!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), chan.2).contains(&warn_msg));
-
- // Check A is able to claim to_remote output
- let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
- // The node B should not broadcast the transaction to force close the channel!
- assert!(node_txn.is_empty());
- // B should now detect that there is something wrong and should force close the channel.
- let exp_err = "We have fallen behind - we have received proof that if we broadcast remote is going to claim our funds - we can\'t do any automated broadcasting";
- check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: exp_err.to_string() });
-
// after the warning message sent by B, we should not able to
// use the channel, or reconnect with success to the channel.
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().is_empty());
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], false);
}
+#[test]
+#[should_panic]
+fn test_data_loss_protect_showing_stale_state_panics() {
+ do_test_data_loss_protect(true);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_force_close_without_broadcast() {
+ do_test_data_loss_protect(false);
+}
+
#[test]
fn test_check_htlc_underpaying() {
// Send payment through A -> B but A is maliciously
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff