use chain;
use chain::{Confirm, Listen, Watch};
+use chain::chaininterface::LowerBoundedFeeEstimator;
use chain::channelmonitor;
use chain::channelmonitor::{ChannelMonitor, CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, ANTI_REORG_DELAY};
use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
use routing::router::{PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, RouteParameters, find_route, get_route};
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs;
-use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, RoutingMessageHandler, OptionalField, ErrorAction};
+use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, RoutingMessageHandler, ErrorAction};
use util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingSigner;
use util::{byte_utils, test_utils};
-use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PaymentPurpose, ClosureReason};
+use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PaymentPurpose, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination};
use util::errors::APIError;
use util::ser::{Writeable, ReadableArgs};
use util::config::UserConfig;
use bitcoin::hash_types::BlockHash;
use bitcoin::blockdata::block::{Block, BlockHeader};
-use bitcoin::blockdata::script::Builder;
+use bitcoin::blockdata::script::{Builder, Script};
use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes;
use bitcoin::blockdata::constants::genesis_block;
use bitcoin::network::constants::Network;
+use bitcoin::{Transaction, TxIn, TxOut, Witness};
+use bitcoin::OutPoint as BitcoinOutPoint;
use bitcoin::secp256k1::Secp256k1;
use bitcoin::secp256k1::{PublicKey,SecretKey};
use prelude::*;
use alloc::collections::BTreeSet;
use core::default::Default;
+use core::iter::repeat;
use sync::{Arc, Mutex};
use ln::functional_test_utils::*;
// Stand up a network of 2 nodes
use ln::channel::TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS;
let mut cfg = UserConfig::default();
- cfg.peer_channel_config_limits.max_funding_satoshis = TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS + 1;
+ cfg.channel_handshake_limits.max_funding_satoshis = TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS + 1;
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(cfg)]);
fail_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], payment_hash_2);
claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
- // Add a duplicate new channel from 2 to 4
- let chan_5 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
-
- // Send some payments across both channels
- let payment_preimage_3 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], 3000000).0;
- let payment_preimage_4 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], 3000000).0;
- let payment_preimage_5 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], 3000000).0;
-
-
- route_over_limit(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], 3000000);
- let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
- assert_eq!(events.len(), 0);
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_regex("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap(), 1);
-
- //TODO: Test that routes work again here as we've been notified that the channel is full
-
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], payment_preimage_3);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], payment_preimage_4);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], payment_preimage_5);
-
// Close down the channels...
close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan_1.2, chan_1.3, true);
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
close_channel(&nodes[1], &nodes[3], &chan_4.2, chan_4.3, false);
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
- close_channel(&nodes[1], &nodes[3], &chan_5.2, chan_5.3, false);
- check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
- check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
}
#[test]
// We have to forward pending HTLCs twice - once tries to forward the payment forward (and
// fails), the second will process the resulting failure and fail the HTLC backward.
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let bs_fail_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
// When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
// It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
- config.channel_options.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 239;
+ config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 239;
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 190000, 1001, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// attempt to send amt_msat > their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat
{
- let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id())
+ .with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()).with_max_channel_saturation_power_of_half(0);
+ let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], payment_params, recv_value_0, TEST_FINAL_CLTV);
route.paths[0].last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat += 1;
assert!(route.paths[0].iter().rev().skip(1).all(|h| h.fee_msat == feemsat));
+
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
if stat01.value_to_self_msat < stat01.channel_reserve_msat + commit_tx_fee_all_htlcs + ensure_htlc_amounts_above_dust_buffer + amt_msat {
break;
}
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1], &nodes[2]][..], recv_value_0);
+
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id())
+ .with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()).with_max_channel_saturation_power_of_half(0);
+ let route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, recv_value_0, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ let (payment_preimage, ..) = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], recv_value_0);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage);
let (stat01_, stat11_, stat12_, stat22_) = (
get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan_1.2),
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
// Simple case with no pending HTLCs:
- nodes[1].node.force_close_channel(&chan_1.2, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_1.2, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
{
// Simple case of one pending HTLC to HTLC-Timeout (note that the HTLC-Timeout is not
// broadcasted until we reach the timelock time).
- nodes[1].node.force_close_channel(&chan_2.2, &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_2.2, &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
{
// nodes[3] gets the preimage, but nodes[2] already disconnected, resulting in a nodes[2]
// HTLC-Timeout and a nodes[3] claim against it (+ its own announces)
- nodes[2].node.force_close_channel(&chan_3.2, &nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ nodes[2].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_3.2, &nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
let node2_commitment_txid;
fn test_justice_tx() {
// Test justice txn built on revoked HTLC-Success tx, against both sides
let mut alice_config = UserConfig::default();
- alice_config.channel_options.announced_channel = true;
- alice_config.peer_channel_config_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
- alice_config.own_channel_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 5;
+ alice_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
+ alice_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
+ alice_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 5;
let mut bob_config = UserConfig::default();
- bob_config.channel_options.announced_channel = true;
- bob_config.peer_channel_config_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
- bob_config.own_channel_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 3;
+ bob_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
+ bob_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
+ bob_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 3;
let user_cfgs = [Some(alice_config), Some(bob_config)];
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8_000_000);
// node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim both offered/received HTLC outputs on top of commitment tx
- let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
- let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3000000);
+ let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
+ let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
// Get the will-be-revoked local txn from node[0]
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
- expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, true);
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
- let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+ let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2); // ChannelMonitor: penalty tx, ChannelManager: local commitment
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Claim the revoked output + both revoked HTLC outputs
// Next nodes[1] broadcasts its current local tx state:
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
- assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid()); //Spending funding tx unique txouput, tx broadcasted by ChannelManager
+ check_spends!(node_txn[1], chan_1.3);
+
+ // Finally, mine the penalty transaction and check that we get an HTLC failure after
+ // ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
+ mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
+ connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
+ expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, true);
}
get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
- send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8_000_000);
// node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim both offered/received HTLC outputs on top of commitment tx, but this
// time as two different claim transactions as we're gonna to timeout htlc with given a high current height
- let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
- let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _payment_secret_2) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3000000);
+ let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
+ let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _payment_secret_2) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
// Get the will-be-revoked local txn from node[0]
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[0], events[0..1], true);
- match events[1] {
+ match events.last().unwrap() {
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
- expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, true);
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
- let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+ let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
assert!(node_txn.len() == 9 || node_txn.len() == 10);
// Check the pair local commitment and HTLC-timeout broadcast due to HTLC expiration
assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(0).next().unwrap(), 77); // revoked to_local
assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(1).next().unwrap(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked offered HTLC
assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(2).next().unwrap(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked received HTLC
+
+ // Finally, mine the penalty transactions and check that we get an HTLC failure after
+ // ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
+ mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[2]);
+ mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[3]);
+ mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[4]);
+ connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
+ expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, true);
}
get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_2.3);
nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash.clone() }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
}
}
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
let (_, third_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], value);
nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&first_payment_hash);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: first_payment_hash }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
// Drop the last RAA from 3 -> 2
nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&second_payment_hash);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: second_payment_hash }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&third_payment_hash);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: third_payment_hash }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
// commitment transaction for nodes[0] until process_pending_htlc_forwards().
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
match events[0] {
Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
};
+ match events[1] {
+ Event::HTLCHandlingFailed { .. } => { },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
// Deliberately don't process the pending fail-back so they all fail back at once after
// block connection just like the !deliver_bs_raa case
}
assert!(ANTI_REORG_DELAY > PAYMENT_EXPIRY_BLOCKS); // We assume payments will also expire
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events.len(), if deliver_bs_raa { 2 } else { 4 });
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), if deliver_bs_raa { 2 + (nodes.len() - 1) } else { 4 + nodes.len() });
match events[0] {
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => { },
_ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 10000000);
- nodes[0].node.force_close_channel(&nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + 1);
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
- let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+ let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 3);
assert_eq!(node_txn[0], node_txn[1]);
// state or updated nodes[1]' state. Now force-close and broadcast that commitment/HTLC
// transaction and ensure nodes[1] doesn't fail-backwards (this was originally a bug!).
- nodes[2].node.force_close_channel(&payment_event.commitment_msg.channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ nodes[2].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&payment_event.commitment_msg.channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
// Now check that if we add the preimage to ChannelMonitor it broadcasts our HTLC-Success..
{
get_monitor!(nodes[2], payment_event.commitment_msg.channel_id)
- .provide_payment_preimage(&our_payment_hash, &our_payment_preimage, &node_cfgs[2].tx_broadcaster, &node_cfgs[2].fee_estimator, &node_cfgs[2].logger);
+ .provide_payment_preimage(&our_payment_hash, &our_payment_preimage, &node_cfgs[2].tx_broadcaster, &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(node_cfgs[2].fee_estimator), &node_cfgs[2].logger);
}
mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &tx);
let node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
}
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let htlc_timeout_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
if forwarded_htlc {
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let fail_commit = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(fail_commit.len(), 1);
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 98_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- nodes[1].node.force_close_channel(&chan.2, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan.2, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 98_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- nodes[0].node.force_close_channel(&chan.2, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan.2, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
- let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+ let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
check_spends!(node_txn[0], chan.3);
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // We can't force trimming of to_remote output as channel_reserve_satoshis block us to do so at channel opening
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 1); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
- let revoked_htlc_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+ let revoked_htlc_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn.len(), 2);
check_spends!(revoked_htlc_txn[0], chan_1.3);
assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
// When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
// It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
- config.channel_options.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196;
+ config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196;
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs,
&[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
let mut nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &htlc_timeout_tx);
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
let htlc_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
assert!(htlc_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
assert_eq!(htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
// When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
// It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
- config.channel_options.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196;
+ config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196;
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(6, &node_cfgs,
&[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
let nodes = create_network(6, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
- create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 4, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 5, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let _chan_0_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let _chan_1_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let chan_2_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let chan_3_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 4, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let chan_3_5 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 5, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Rebalance and check output sanity...
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 500000);
send_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]], 500000);
- assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan.2)[0].output.len(), 2);
+ assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2)[0].output.len(), 2);
- let ds_dust_limit = nodes[3].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
+ let ds_dust_limit = nodes[3].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get(&chan_2_3.2).unwrap().holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
// 0th HTLC:
let (_, payment_hash_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
// 1st HTLC:
// Double-check that six of the new HTLC were added
// We now have six HTLCs pending over the dust limit and six HTLCs under the dust limit (ie,
// with to_local and to_remote outputs, 8 outputs and 6 HTLCs not included).
- assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan.2).len(), 1);
- assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan.2)[0].output.len(), 8);
+ assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2).len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2)[0].output.len(), 8);
// Now fail back three of the over-dust-limit and three of the under-dust-limit payments in one go.
// Fail 0th below-dust, 4th above-dust, 8th above-dust, 10th below-dust HTLCs
nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_5);
nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_6);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 0);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[4]);
+
+ let failed_destinations = vec![
+ HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_1 },
+ HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_3 },
+ HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_5 },
+ HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_6 },
+ ];
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[4], failed_destinations);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 1);
let four_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[4], nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_2);
nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_4);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[5], 0);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[5]);
+
+ let failed_destinations_2 = vec![
+ HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_2 },
+ HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_4 },
+ ];
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[5], failed_destinations_2);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[5], 1);
let two_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[5], nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id(), &two_removes.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[3], nodes[5], two_removes.commitment_signed, false);
- let ds_prev_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan.2);
-
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[3]);
+ let ds_prev_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2);
+
+ // After 4 and 2 removes respectively above in nodes[4] and nodes[5], nodes[3] should receive 6 PaymentForwardedFailed events
+ let failed_destinations_3 = vec![
+ HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
+ HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
+ HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
+ HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
+ HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_5.2 },
+ HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_5.2 },
+ ];
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[3], failed_destinations_3);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
let six_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[3], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
//
// Alternatively, we may broadcast the previous commitment transaction, which should only
// result in failures for the below-dust HTLCs, ie the 0th, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 9th, and 10th HTLCs.
- let ds_last_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan.2);
+ let ds_last_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2);
if announce_latest {
mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &ds_last_commitment_tx[0]);
}
let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
let close_event = if deliver_last_raa {
- assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
- events[1].clone()
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 2 + 6);
+ events.last().clone().unwrap()
} else {
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
- events[0].clone()
+ events.last().clone().unwrap()
};
match close_event {
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
if deliver_last_raa {
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[2], events[0..1], true);
+
+ let expected_destinations: Vec<HTLCDestination> = repeat(HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }).take(3).collect();
+ expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!(nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), expected_destinations);
} else {
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
+ let expected_destinations: Vec<HTLCDestination> = if announce_latest {
+ repeat(HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }).take(9).collect()
+ } else {
+ repeat(HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }).take(6).collect()
+ };
+
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], expected_destinations);
}
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 3);
let htlc_value = if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 };
let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], htlc_value);
nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let bs_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
// When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
// It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
- config.channel_options.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196;
+ config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196;
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
let chan_0_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// nodes[1]'s ChannelManager will now signal that we have HTLC forwards to process.
let process_htlc_forwards_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(process_htlc_forwards_event.len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(process_htlc_forwards_event.len(), 2);
match &process_htlc_forwards_event[0] {
&Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => {},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 1000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 1000000, 1000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 1000000, 1000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 100000);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], update_msg.1, false, true);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
let events_4 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
// Fail one HTLC to prune it in the will-be-latest-local commitment tx
nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_2);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_2 }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let remove = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
+
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 1); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
- timeout_tx.push(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap()[1].clone());
+ timeout_tx = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().drain(..)
+ .filter(|tx| tx.input[0].previous_output.txid == bs_commitment_tx[0].txid()).collect();
+ check_spends!(timeout_tx[0], bs_commitment_tx[0]);
+ // For both a revoked or non-revoked commitment transaction, after ANTI_REORG_DELAY the
+ // dust HTLC should have been failed.
+ expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], dust_hash, true);
+
if !revoked {
- expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], dust_hash, true);
assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
- // We fail non-dust-HTLC 2 by broadcast of local timeout tx on remote commitment tx
- mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &timeout_tx[0]);
- assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
- connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
- expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], non_dust_hash, true);
} else {
- // If revoked, both dust & non-dust HTLCs should have been failed after ANTI_REORG_DELAY confs of revoked
- // commitment tx
- let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
- let first;
- match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
- if payment_hash == dust_hash { first = true; }
- else { first = false; }
- },
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
- }
- match events[1] {
- Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
- if first { assert_eq!(payment_hash, non_dust_hash); }
- else { assert_eq!(payment_hash, dust_hash); }
- },
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
- }
+ assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].lock_time, 0);
}
+ // We fail non-dust-HTLC 2 by broadcast of local timeout/revocation-claim tx
+ mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &timeout_tx[0]);
+ assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
+ connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
+ expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], non_dust_hash, true);
}
}
// We test our channel constructors yield errors when we pass them absurd csv delay
let mut low_our_to_self_config = UserConfig::default();
- low_our_to_self_config.own_channel_config.our_to_self_delay = 6;
+ low_our_to_self_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6;
let mut high_their_to_self_config = UserConfig::default();
- high_their_to_self_config.peer_channel_config_limits.their_to_self_delay = 100;
+ high_their_to_self_config.channel_handshake_limits.their_to_self_delay = 100;
let user_cfgs = [Some(high_their_to_self_config.clone()), None];
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
// We test config.our_to_self > BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT is enforced in Channel::new_outbound()
- if let Err(error) = Channel::new_outbound(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) },
+ if let Err(error) = Channel::new_outbound(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
&nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), 1000000, 1000000, 0,
&low_our_to_self_config, 0, 42)
{
nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
- if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) },
+ if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
&nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0,
&low_our_to_self_config, 0, &nodes[0].logger, 42)
{
nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
- if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) },
+ if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
&nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0,
&high_their_to_self_config, 0, &nodes[0].logger, 42)
{
} else { assert!(false); }
}
-#[test]
-fn test_data_loss_protect() {
- // We want to be sure that :
- // * we don't broadcast our Local Commitment Tx in case of fallen behind
- // (but this is not quite true - we broadcast during Drop because chanmon is out of sync with chanmgr)
- // * we close channel in case of detecting other being fallen behind
- // * we are able to claim our own outputs thanks to to_remote being static
- // TODO: this test is incomplete and the data_loss_protect implementation is incomplete - see issue #775
+fn do_test_data_loss_protect(reconnect_panicing: bool) {
+ // When we get a data_loss_protect proving we're behind, we immediately panic as the
+ // chain::Watch API requirements have been violated (e.g. the user restored from a backup). The
+ // panic message informs the user they should force-close without broadcasting, which is tested
+ // if `reconnect_panicing` is not set.
let persister;
let logger;
let fee_estimator;
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
- nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty(), remote_network_address: None });
- nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty(), remote_network_address: None });
+ if reconnect_panicing {
+ nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty(), remote_network_address: None });
+ nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty(), remote_network_address: None });
- let reestablish_0 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
+ let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
- // Check we don't broadcast any transactions following learning of per_commitment_point from B
- nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_0[0]);
- check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ // Check we close channel detecting A is fallen-behind
+ // Check that we sent the warning message when we detected that A has fallen behind,
+ // and give the possibility for A to recover from the warning.
+ nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[0]);
+ let warn_msg = "Peer attempted to reestablish channel with a very old local commitment transaction".to_owned();
+ assert!(check_warn_msg!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), chan.2).contains(&warn_msg));
+
+ {
+ let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
+ // The node B should not broadcast the transaction to force close the channel!
+ assert!(node_txn.is_empty());
+ }
+
+ let reestablish_0 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
+ // Check A panics upon seeing proof it has fallen behind.
+ nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_0[0]);
+ return; // By this point we should have panic'ed!
+ }
+ nodes[0].node.force_close_without_broadcasting_txn(&chan.2, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
{
- let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
+ let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 0);
}
- let mut reestablish_1 = Vec::with_capacity(1);
for msg in nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events() {
- if let MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish { ref node_id, ref msg } = msg {
- assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
- reestablish_1.push(msg.clone());
- } else if let MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } = msg {
+ if let MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } = msg {
} else if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref action, .. } = msg {
match action {
&ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg } => {
- assert_eq!(msg.data, "We have fallen behind - we have received proof that if we broadcast remote is going to claim our funds - we can't do any automated broadcasting");
+ assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel force-closed");
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event!"),
}
} else {
- panic!("Unexpected event")
+ panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", msg)
}
}
- // Check we close channel detecting A is fallen-behind
- // Check that we sent the warning message when we detected that A has fallen behind,
- // and give the possibility for A to recover from the warning.
- nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[0]);
- let warn_msg = "Peer attempted to reestablish channel with a very old local commitment transaction".to_owned();
- assert!(check_warn_msg!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), chan.2).contains(&warn_msg));
-
- // Check A is able to claim to_remote output
- let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
- // The node B should not broadcast the transaction to force close the channel!
- assert!(node_txn.is_empty());
- // B should now detect that there is something wrong and should force close the channel.
- let exp_err = "We have fallen behind - we have received proof that if we broadcast remote is going to claim our funds - we can\'t do any automated broadcasting";
- check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: exp_err.to_string() });
-
// after the warning message sent by B, we should not able to
// use the channel, or reconnect with success to the channel.
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().is_empty());
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], false);
}
+#[test]
+#[should_panic]
+fn test_data_loss_protect_showing_stale_state_panics() {
+ do_test_data_loss_protect(true);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_force_close_without_broadcast() {
+ do_test_data_loss_protect(false);
+}
+
#[test]
fn test_check_htlc_underpaying() {
// Send payment through A -> B but A is maliciously
// Note that we first have to wait a random delay before processing the receipt of the HTLC,
// and then will wait a second random delay before failing the HTLC back:
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
// Node 3 is expecting payment of 100_000 but received 10_000,
// it should fail htlc like we didn't know the preimage.
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 49); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires (note CLTV was explicitly 50 above)
- let revoked_htlc_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+ let revoked_htlc_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn.len(), 3);
check_spends!(revoked_htlc_txn[1], chan.3);
connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header: header_129, txdata: vec![revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[2].clone()] });
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[0], events[0..1], true);
- match events[1] {
+ match events.last().unwrap() {
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
let channel_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).2;
- let mut guard = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
- let keys = guard.by_id.get_mut(&channel_id).unwrap().get_signer();
+ let per_commitment_secret;
+ let next_per_commitment_point;
+ {
+ let mut guard = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
+ let keys = guard.by_id.get_mut(&channel_id).unwrap().get_signer();
- const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = (1 << 48) - 1;
+ const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = (1 << 48) - 1;
- // Make signer believe we got a counterparty signature, so that it allows the revocation
- keys.get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
- let per_commitment_secret = keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER);
+ // Make signer believe we got a counterparty signature, so that it allows the revocation
+ keys.get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
+ per_commitment_secret = keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER);
- // Must revoke without gaps
- keys.get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
- keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1);
+ // Must revoke without gaps
+ keys.get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
+ keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1);
- keys.get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
- let next_per_commitment_point = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(),
- &SecretKey::from_slice(&keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2)).unwrap());
+ keys.get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
+ next_per_commitment_point = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(),
+ &SecretKey::from_slice(&keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2)).unwrap());
+ }
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(),
&msgs::RevokeAndACK { channel_id, per_commitment_secret, next_per_commitment_point });
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Lock HTLC in both directions
- let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9_000_000).0;
- route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 9_000_000).0;
+ let (payment_preimage_1, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9_000_000);
+ let (_, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 9_000_000);
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2);
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
// Revoke local commitment tx
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
// Broadcast set of revoked txn on A
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 2 - CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[0]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[0], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_2 }]);
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 0);
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
// Node0 initiates a channel to node1 using the override config.
let mut override_config = UserConfig::default();
- override_config.own_channel_config.our_to_self_delay = 200;
+ override_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 200;
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 16_000_000, 12_000_000, 42, Some(override_config)).unwrap();
#[test]
fn test_override_0msat_htlc_minimum() {
let mut zero_config = UserConfig::default();
- zero_config.own_channel_config.our_htlc_minimum_msat = 0;
+ zero_config.channel_handshake_config.our_htlc_minimum_msat = 0;
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(zero_config.clone())]);
// 2. MUST be set to less than or equal to the `max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat` received from the peer.
let mut config_30_percent = UserConfig::default();
- config_30_percent.channel_options.announced_channel = true;
- config_30_percent.own_channel_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 30;
+ config_30_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
+ config_30_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 30;
let mut config_50_percent = UserConfig::default();
- config_50_percent.channel_options.announced_channel = true;
- config_50_percent.own_channel_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 50;
+ config_50_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
+ config_50_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 50;
let mut config_95_percent = UserConfig::default();
- config_95_percent.channel_options.announced_channel = true;
- config_95_percent.own_channel_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 95;
+ config_95_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
+ config_95_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 95;
let mut config_100_percent = UserConfig::default();
- config_100_percent.channel_options.announced_channel = true;
- config_100_percent.own_channel_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 100;
+ config_100_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
+ config_100_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 100;
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
// Assert that `node[0]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 50 percent of the `channel_value`, as
// that's the value of `node[1]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat`.
- assert_eq!(node_0_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, OptionalField::Present(channel_value_50_percent_msat));
+ assert_eq!(node_0_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_50_percent_msat);
// Assert that `node[1]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 30 percent of the `channel_value`, as
// that's the value of `node[0]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat`.
- assert_eq!(node_1_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, OptionalField::Present(channel_value_30_percent_msat));
+ assert_eq!(node_1_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_30_percent_msat);
// Assert that `node[2]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 90 percent of the `channel_value`, as
// the value of `node[3]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat` (100%), exceeds 90% of the
// `channel_value`.
- assert_eq!(node_2_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, OptionalField::Present(channel_value_90_percent_msat));
+ assert_eq!(node_2_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_90_percent_msat);
// Assert that `node[3]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 90 percent of the `channel_value`, as
// the value of `node[2]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat` (95%), exceeds 90% of the
// `channel_value`.
- assert_eq!(node_3_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, OptionalField::Present(channel_value_90_percent_msat));
+ assert_eq!(node_3_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_90_percent_msat);
}
#[test]
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
- nodes[1].node.force_close_channel(&temp_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&temp_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
let close_msg_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(close_msg_ev.len(), 1);
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
match events[0] {
Event::OpenChannelRequest { temporary_channel_id, .. } => {
- nodes[1].node.force_close_channel(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
}
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
// `MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel` event. The message is passed to `nodes[0]`
// `handle_accept_channel`, which is required in order for `create_funding_transaction` to
// succeed when `nodes[0]` is passed to it.
- {
+ let accept_chan_msg = {
let mut lock;
let channel = get_channel_ref!(&nodes[1], lock, temp_channel_id);
- let accept_chan_msg = channel.get_accept_channel_message();
- nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &accept_chan_msg);
- }
+ channel.get_accept_channel_message()
+ };
+ nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &accept_chan_msg);
let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42);
// All the below cases should end up being handled exactly identically, so we macro the
// resulting events.
macro_rules! handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data {
- () => {
+ ($payment_hash: expr) => {
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
// We have to forward pending HTLCs once to process the receipt of the HTLC and then
// again to process the pending backwards-failure of the HTLC
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment{ payment_hash: $payment_hash }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
// We should fail the payment back
// Send a payment with the right payment hash but the wrong payment secret
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(random_payment_secret)).unwrap();
- handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!();
+ handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!(our_payment_hash);
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
// Send a payment with a random payment hash, but the right payment secret
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, random_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)).unwrap();
- handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!();
+ handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!(random_payment_hash);
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], random_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
// Send a payment with a random payment hash and random payment secret
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, random_payment_hash, &Some(random_payment_secret)).unwrap();
- handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!();
+ handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!(random_payment_hash);
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], random_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
}
force_closing_node = 1;
counterparty_node = 0;
}
- nodes[force_closing_node].node.force_close_channel(&chan_ab.2, &nodes[counterparty_node].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ nodes[force_closing_node].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_ab.2, &nodes[counterparty_node].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[force_closing_node], true);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[force_closing_node], 1);
check_closed_event!(nodes[force_closing_node], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
// funding transactions from their counterparties, leading to a multi-implementation critical
// security vulnerability (though we always sanitized properly, we've previously had
// un-released crashes in the sanitization process).
+ //
+ // Further, if the funding transaction is consensus-valid, confirms, and is later spent, we'd
+ // previously have crashed in `ChannelMonitor` even though we closed the channel as bogus and
+ // gave up on it. We test this here by generating such a transaction.
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
let (temporary_channel_id, mut tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 42);
+
+ // Create a witness program which can be spent by a 4-empty-stack-elements witness and which is
+ // 136 bytes long. This matches our "accepted HTLC preimage spend" matching, previously causing
+ // a panic as we'd try to extract a 32 byte preimage from a witness element without checking
+ // its length.
+ let mut wit_program: Vec<u8> = channelmonitor::deliberately_bogus_accepted_htlc_witness_program();
+ assert!(chan_utils::HTLCType::scriptlen_to_htlctype(wit_program.len()).unwrap() ==
+ chan_utils::HTLCType::AcceptedHTLC);
+
+ let wit_program_script: Script = wit_program.clone().into();
for output in tx.output.iter_mut() {
// Make the confirmed funding transaction have a bogus script_pubkey
- output.script_pubkey = bitcoin::Script::new();
+ output.script_pubkey = Script::new_v0_p2wsh(&wit_program_script.wscript_hash());
}
nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated_unchecked(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone(), 0).unwrap();
} else { panic!(); }
} else { panic!(); }
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
+
+ // Now confirm a spend of the (bogus) funding transaction. As long as the witness is 5 elements
+ // long the ChannelMonitor will try to read 32 bytes from the second-to-last element, panicing
+ // as its not 32 bytes long.
+ let mut spend_tx = Transaction {
+ version: 2i32, lock_time: 0,
+ input: tx.output.iter().enumerate().map(|(idx, _)| TxIn {
+ previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint {
+ txid: tx.txid(),
+ vout: idx as u32,
+ },
+ script_sig: Script::new(),
+ sequence: 0xfffffffd,
+ witness: Witness::from_vec(channelmonitor::deliberately_bogus_accepted_htlc_witness())
+ }).collect(),
+ output: vec![TxOut {
+ value: 1000,
+ script_pubkey: Script::new(),
+ }]
+ };
+ check_spends!(spend_tx, tx);
+ mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &spend_tx);
}
fn do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(test_height_before_timelock: bool) {
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[2].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
- nodes[1].node.force_close_channel(&channel_id, &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&channel_id, &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
// additional block built on top of the current chain.
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.transactions_confirmed(
&nodes[1].get_block_header(conf_height + 1), &[(0, &spending_txn[1])], conf_height + 1);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: channel_id }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
// Now we go fail back the first HTLC from the user end.
nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]);
+ let expected_destinations = vec![
+ HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash },
+ HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash },
+ ];
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[1], expected_destinations);
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[1] {} else { panic!(); }
} else {
// Let the second HTLC fail and claim the first
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
- expect_payment_failed_conditions!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
+ expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage);
}
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 2, 100_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 3, 100_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, 100_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let chan_2_3 =create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, 100_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id())
.with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
}
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[3]);
nodes[3].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[3]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[3], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
nodes[3].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[3], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let fail_updates_2 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_2.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[2], fail_updates_2.commitment_signed, false);
- expect_payment_failed_conditions!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
+ expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[1], &payment_params_opt, &our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret), 15_000_000, cur_height, payment_id, &None).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
};
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
- let route = find_route(&payer_pubkey, &route_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
+ let route = find_route(&payer_pubkey, &route_params, &network_graph, None, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
let test_preimage = PaymentPreimage([42; 32]);
let (payment_hash, _) = nodes[0].node.send_spontaneous_payment(&route, Some(test_preimage)).unwrap();
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let route = find_route(
- &payer_pubkey, &route_params, &network_graph.read_only(),
- Some(&first_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes
+ &payer_pubkey, &route_params, &network_graph, Some(&first_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()),
+ nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes
).unwrap();
let test_preimage = PaymentPreimage([42; 32]);
connect_blocks(&nodes[3], TEST_FINAL_CLTV);
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // To get the same height for sending later
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[3]);
+ let failed_destinations = vec![
+ HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash },
+ HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash },
+ ];
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[3], failed_destinations);
pass_failed_payment_back(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, payment_hash);
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
- config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat = 5_000_000; // default setting value
+ config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat = 5_000_000; // default setting value
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config), None]);
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
chan.get_dust_buffer_feerate(None) as u64
};
let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_timeout_tx_weight(opt_anchors) / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
- let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
+ let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_success_tx_weight(opt_anchors) / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
- let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
+ let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx: u64 = 25;
- let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx;
+ let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx;
if on_holder_tx {
if dust_outbound_balance {
if on_holder_tx {
let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1);
let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
- unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, assert_eq!(err, &format!("Cannot send value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat)));
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, assert_eq!(err, &format!("Cannot send value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat)));
} else {
- unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, assert_eq!(err, &format!("Cannot send value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", dust_overflow, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat)));
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, assert_eq!(err, &format!("Cannot send value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", dust_overflow, config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat)));
}
} else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception {
let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], if on_holder_tx { dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat });
// Outbound dust balance: 6399 sats
let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1);
let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
} else {
// Outbound dust balance: 5200 sats
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", dust_overflow, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", dust_overflow, config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
}
} else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound {
let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 2_500_000);
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false);
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true);
}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_non_final_funding_tx() {
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+ let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel_message);
+ let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &accept_channel_message);
+
+ let best_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
+
+ let chan_id = *nodes[0].network_chan_count.borrow();
+ let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ let input = TxIn { previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint::null(), script_sig: bitcoin::Script::new(), sequence: 0x1, witness: Witness::from_vec(vec!(vec!(1))) };
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let mut tx = match events[0] {
+ Event::FundingGenerationReady { ref channel_value_satoshis, ref output_script, .. } => {
+ // Timelock the transaction _beyond_ the best client height + 2.
+ Transaction { version: chan_id as i32, lock_time: best_height + 3, input: vec![input], output: vec![TxOut {
+ value: *channel_value_satoshis, script_pubkey: output_script.clone(),
+ }]}
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+ // Transaction should fail as it's evaluated as non-final for propagation.
+ match nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temp_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()) {
+ Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => {
+ assert_eq!(format!("Funding transaction absolute timelock is non-final"), err);
+ },
+ _ => panic!()
+ }
+
+ // However, transaction should be accepted if it's in a +2 headroom from best block.
+ tx.lock_time -= 1;
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temp_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).is_ok());
+ get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+}
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff