use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, PaymentId, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
use ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError};
use ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils};
-use ln::chan_utils::HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT;
+use ln::chan_utils::{HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT, HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT, HTLCOutputInCommitment};
use routing::network_graph::{NetworkUpdate, RoutingFees};
use routing::router::{Payee, Route, RouteHop, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteParameters, find_route, get_route};
-use routing::scorer::Scorer;
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs;
use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, RoutingMessageHandler, ErrorAction};
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
- let channel_value = 1888;
+ let channel_value = 1977;
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value, 700000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
let channel_id = chan.2;
+ let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let feerate = 260;
{
*feerate_lock = feerate + 2;
}
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
- check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot afford to send new feerate at {}", feerate + 2), 1);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
+
+ const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 281474976710654;
+
+ // Get the EnforcingSigner for each channel, which will be used to (1) get the keys
+ // needed to sign the new commitment tx and (2) sign the new commitment tx.
+ let (local_revocation_basepoint, local_htlc_basepoint, local_funding) = {
+ let chan_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
+ let local_chan = chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
+ let chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
+ let pubkeys = chan_signer.pubkeys();
+ (pubkeys.revocation_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
+ pubkeys.funding_pubkey)
+ };
+ let (remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, remote_htlc_basepoint,remote_point, remote_funding) = {
+ let chan_lock = nodes[1].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
+ let remote_chan = chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
+ let chan_signer = remote_chan.get_signer();
+ let pubkeys = chan_signer.pubkeys();
+ (pubkeys.delayed_payment_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
+ chan_signer.get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1, &secp_ctx),
+ pubkeys.funding_pubkey)
+ };
+
+ // Assemble the set of keys we can use for signatures for our commitment_signed message.
+ let commit_tx_keys = chan_utils::TxCreationKeys::derive_new(&secp_ctx, &remote_point, &remote_delayed_payment_basepoint,
+ &remote_htlc_basepoint, &local_revocation_basepoint, &local_htlc_basepoint).unwrap();
+
+ let res = {
+ let local_chan_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
+ let local_chan = local_chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
+ let local_chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
+ let mut htlcs: Vec<(HTLCOutputInCommitment, ())> = vec![];
+ let commitment_tx = CommitmentTransaction::new_with_auxiliary_htlc_data(
+ INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1,
+ 700,
+ 999,
+ false, local_funding, remote_funding,
+ commit_tx_keys.clone(),
+ feerate + 124,
+ &mut htlcs,
+ &local_chan.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable()
+ );
+ local_chan_signer.sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, &secp_ctx).unwrap()
+ };
+
+ let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned {
+ channel_id: chan.2,
+ signature: res.0,
+ htlc_signatures: res.1
+ };
- let update2_msg = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ let update_fee = msgs::UpdateFee {
+ channel_id: chan.2,
+ feerate_per_kw: feerate + 124,
+ };
- nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update2_msg.update_fee.unwrap());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fee);
//While producing the commitment_signed response after handling a received update_fee request the
//check to see if the funder, who sent the update_fee request, can afford the new fee (funder_balance >= fee+channel_reserve)
//Should produce and error.
- nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update2_msg.commitment_signed);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commit_signed_msg);
nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee".to_string(), 1);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 900_000);
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 800_000);
- let node_a_payment_secret = nodes[0].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, None, 7200, 0).unwrap();
+ let node_a_payment_secret = nodes[0].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, None, 7200).unwrap();
send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[0]]], 800_000, payment_hash, node_a_payment_secret);
// Provide preimage to node 0 by claiming payment
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { node_id, action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg } } => {
assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
- assert_eq!(msg.data, "Commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain.");
+ assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain.");
},
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_removes.commitment_signed);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
- expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
+ expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_1.msgs[0]);
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_1.commitment_msg);
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_cs.commitment_signed);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
- expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_2);
+ expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_2);
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
// resolve the second HTLC from A's point of view.
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
// Now that B doesn't have the second RAA anymore, but A still does, send a payment from B back
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed);
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 5);
let mut first_claimed = false;
for event in events {
match event {
assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_2);
}
},
+ Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {},
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
match events[if deliver_bs_raa { 2 } else { 1 }] {
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { msg: msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id, ref data } }, node_id: _ } => {
assert_eq!(channel_id, chan_2.2);
- assert_eq!(data.as_str(), "Commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain.");
+ assert_eq!(data.as_str(), "Channel closed because commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain.");
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let claim_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &claim_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
- expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
+ expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
- assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
+ expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
}
#[test]
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 0), (false, false));
{
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
match events[0] {
Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash, .. } => {
assert_eq!(payment_preimage, payment_preimage_3);
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
+ match events[2] {
+ Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {},
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
}
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_preimage_4);
if messages_delivered < 2 {
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
if messages_delivered < 1 {
- let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
- match events_4[0] {
- Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, .. } => {
- assert_eq!(payment_preimage_1, *payment_preimage);
- assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash);
- },
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
- }
+ expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
} else {
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
}
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
}
+ if messages_delivered == 1 || messages_delivered == 2 {
+ expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
+ }
+
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ if messages_delivered > 2 {
+ expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
+ }
+
// Channel should still work fine...
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
let payment_preimage_2 = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 1000000).0;
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2);
}
}
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
- connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS);
+ connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS);
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
let (our_payment_preimage, duplicate_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 900000);
- let payment_secret = nodes[3].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(duplicate_payment_hash, None, 7200, 0).unwrap();
+ let payment_secret = nodes[3].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(duplicate_payment_hash, None, 7200).unwrap();
// We reduce the final CLTV here by a somewhat arbitrary constant to keep it under the one-byte
// script push size limit so that the below script length checks match
// ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT.
let (_, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], ds_dust_limit*1000);
// 2nd HTLC:
- send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_1, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_1, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
+ send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_1, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_1, None, 7200).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
// 3rd HTLC:
- send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_2, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_2, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
+ send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_2, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_2, None, 7200).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
// 4th HTLC:
let (_, payment_hash_3, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000);
// 5th HTLC:
let (_, payment_hash_4, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000);
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], 1000000);
// 6th HTLC:
- send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_3, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_3, None, 7200, 0).unwrap());
+ send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_3, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_3, None, 7200).unwrap());
// 7th HTLC:
- send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_4, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_4, None, 7200, 0).unwrap());
+ send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_4, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_4, None, 7200).unwrap());
// 8th HTLC:
let (_, payment_hash_5, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000);
// 9th HTLC:
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], ds_dust_limit*1000);
- send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_5, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_5, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
+ send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_5, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_5, None, 7200).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
// 10th HTLC:
let (_, payment_hash_6, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
// 11th HTLC:
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], 1000000);
- send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_6, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_6, None, 7200, 0).unwrap());
+ send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_6, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_6, None, 7200).unwrap());
// Double-check that six of the new HTLC were added
// We now have six HTLCs pending over the dust limit and six HTLCs under the dust limit (ie,
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 });
+ let (payment_preimage, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 });
// Claim the payment, but don't deliver A's commitment_signed, resulting in the HTLC only being
// present in B's local commitment transaction, but none of A's commitment transactions.
- assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage));
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let bs_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
- let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
- match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash, .. } => {
- assert_eq!(payment_preimage, our_payment_preimage);
- assert_eq!(payment_hash, our_payment_hash);
- },
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
- }
+ expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.commitment_signed);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let update_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], update_msgs.commitment_signed, false, true);
- let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
- match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, .. } => {
- assert_eq!(*payment_preimage, payment_preimage_1);
- assert_eq!(*payment_hash, payment_hash_1);
- }
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
- }
+ expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
}
// Test that if we fail to forward an HTLC that is being freed from the holding cell that the
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
// We test config.our_to_self > BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT is enforced in Channel::new_outbound()
- if let Err(error) = Channel::new_outbound(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), 1000000, 1000000, 0, &low_our_to_self_config) {
+ if let Err(error) = Channel::new_outbound(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), 1000000, 1000000, 0, &low_our_to_self_config, 0) {
match error {
APIError::APIMisuseError { err } => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
- if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &low_our_to_self_config) {
+ if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &low_our_to_self_config, 0) {
match error {
ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
- if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &high_their_to_self_config) {
+ if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &high_their_to_self_config, 0) {
match error {
ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
// Create some initial channels
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- let payee = Payee::new(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payee, nodes[0].network_graph, None, 10_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, nodes[0].logger, &scorer).unwrap();
let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
- let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(our_payment_hash, Some(100_000), 7200, 0).unwrap();
+ let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(our_payment_hash, Some(100_000), 7200).unwrap();
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Lock HTLC in both directions (using a slightly lower CLTV delay to provide timely RBF bumps)
- let payee = Payee::new(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
- let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payee, &nodes[0].network_graph, None,
3_000_000, 50, nodes[0].logger, &scorer).unwrap();
let payment_preimage = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
- let payee = Payee::new(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payee, nodes[1].network_graph, None,
3_000_000, 50, nodes[0].logger, &scorer).unwrap();
send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
}
}
+#[test]
+fn test_channel_conf_timeout() {
+ // Tests that, for inbound channels, we give up on them if the funding transaction does not
+ // confirm within 2016 blocks, as recommended by BOLT 2.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ let _funding_tx = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_init(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 1_000_000, 100_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+
+ // The outbound node should wait forever for confirmation:
+ // This matches `channel::FUNDING_CONF_DEADLINE_BLOCKS` and BOLT 2's suggested timeout, thus is
+ // copied here instead of directly referencing the constant.
+ connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 2016);
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
+
+ // The inbound node should fail the channel after exactly 2016 blocks
+ connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 2015);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
+
+ connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::FundingTimedOut);
+ let close_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(close_ev.len(), 1);
+ match close_ev[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, ref node_id } => {
+ assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because funding transaction failed to confirm within 2016 blocks");
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+}
+
#[test]
fn test_override_channel_config() {
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
{
- let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 7200, 42);
+ let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 7200);
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000);
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
match events[0] {
Event::PaymentReceived { ref purpose, .. } => {
match &purpose {
- PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, user_payment_id, .. } => {
- assert_eq!(*user_payment_id, 42);
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, .. } => {
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage.unwrap());
},
_ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
- let (payment_hash, payment_secret_1) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2, 0);
+ let (payment_hash, payment_secret_1) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2);
// We should fail to register the same payment hash twice, at least until we've connected a
// block with time 7200 + CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1.
- if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2, 0) {
+ if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2) {
assert_eq!(err, "Duplicate payment hash");
} else { panic!(); }
let mut block = {
}
};
connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
- if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2, 0) {
+ if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2) {
assert_eq!(err, "Duplicate payment hash");
} else { panic!(); }
// If we then connect the second block, we should be able to register the same payment hash
- // again with a different user_payment_id (this time getting a new payment secret).
+ // again (this time getting a new payment secret).
block.header.prev_blockhash = block.header.block_hash();
block.header.time += 1;
connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
- let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2, 42).unwrap();
+ let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2).unwrap();
assert_ne!(payment_secret_1, our_payment_secret);
{
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, user_payment_id }, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret }, .. } => {
assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!(user_payment_id, 42);
assert_eq!(payment_secret, our_payment_secret);
// We don't actually have the payment preimage with which to claim this payment!
},
let random_payment_hash = PaymentHash([42; 32]);
let random_payment_secret = PaymentSecret([43; 32]);
- let (our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2, 0);
+ let (our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2);
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000);
// All the below cases should end up being handled exactly identically, so we macro the
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap()[0], tx);
nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clear();
+ let expected_err = "funding tx had wrong script/value or output index";
confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[1], &tx, 1);
- check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
+ check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: expected_err.to_string() });
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { node_id, action } = &events_2[0] {
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
if let msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { msg } = action {
- assert_eq!(msg.data, "funding tx had wrong script/value or output index");
+ assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because of an exception: ".to_owned() + expected_err);
} else { panic!(); }
} else { panic!(); }
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
final_value_msat: 10000,
final_cltv_expiry_delta: 40,
};
- let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let route = find_route(&payer_pubkey, ¶ms, network_graph, None, nodes[0].logger, &scorer).unwrap();
let test_preimage = PaymentPreimage([42; 32]);
};
let network_graph = nodes[0].network_graph;
let first_hops = nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels();
- let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let route = find_route(
&payer_pubkey, ¶ms, network_graph, Some(&first_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()),
nodes[0].logger, &scorer
pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &path, 10000, payment_hash, None, event, true, Some(test_preimage));
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &path, test_preimage);
}
+
+/// The possible events which may trigger a `max_dust_htlc_exposure` breach
+#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
+enum ExposureEvent {
+ /// Breach occurs at HTLC forwarding (see `send_htlc`)
+ AtHTLCForward,
+ /// Breach occurs at HTLC reception (see `update_add_htlc`)
+ AtHTLCReception,
+ /// Breach occurs at outbound update_fee (see `send_update_fee`)
+ AtUpdateFeeOutbound,
+}
+
+fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_event: ExposureEvent, on_holder_tx: bool) {
+ // Test that we properly reject dust HTLC violating our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`
+ // policy.
+ //
+ // At HTLC forward (`send_payment()`), if the sum of the trimmed-to-dust HTLC inbound and
+ // trimmed-to-dust HTLC outbound balance and this new payment as included on next
+ // counterparty commitment are above our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`, we'll reject the
+ // update. At HTLC reception (`update_add_htlc()`), if the sum of the trimmed-to-dust HTLC
+ // inbound and trimmed-to-dust HTLC outbound balance and this new received HTLC as included
+ // on next counterparty commitment are above our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`, we'll fail
+ // the update. Note, we return a `temporary_channel_failure` (0x1000 | 7), as the channel
+ // might be available again for HTLC processing once the dust bandwidth has cleared up.
+
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
+ config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat = 5_000_000; // default setting value
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config), None]);
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 500_000_000, 42, None).unwrap();
+ let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ open_channel.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 50_000_000;
+ open_channel.max_accepted_htlcs = 60;
+ if on_holder_tx {
+ open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis = 546;
+ }
+ nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel);
+ let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &accept_channel);
+
+ let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], 1_000_000, 42);
+
+ if on_holder_tx {
+ if let Some(mut chan) = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get_mut(&temporary_channel_id) {
+ chan.holder_dust_limit_satoshis = 546;
+ }
+ }
+
+ nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, tx.clone()).unwrap();
+ nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ let (funding_locked, channel_id) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx);
+ let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_locked);
+ update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update);
+
+ let dust_buffer_feerate = {
+ let chan_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
+ let chan = chan_lock.by_id.get(&channel_id).unwrap();
+ chan.get_dust_buffer_feerate(None) as u64
+ };
+ let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
+ let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
+
+ let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
+ let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
+
+ let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx: u64 = 25;
+ let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx;
+
+ if on_holder_tx {
+ if dust_outbound_balance {
+ // Outbound dust threshold: 2223 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + holder's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
+ // Outbound dust balance: 4372 sats
+ // Note, we need sent payment to be above outbound dust threshold on counterparty_tx of 2132 sats
+ for i in 0..dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx {
+ let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat);
+ if let Err(_) = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)) { panic!("Unexpected event at dust HTLC {}", i); }
+ }
+ } else {
+ // Inbound dust threshold: 2324 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + holder's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
+ // Inbound dust balance: 4372 sats
+ // Note, we need sent payment to be above outbound dust threshold on counterparty_tx of 2031 sats
+ for _ in 0..dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx {
+ route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat);
+ }
+ }
+ } else {
+ if dust_outbound_balance {
+ // Outbound dust threshold: 2132 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + counteparty's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
+ // Outbound dust balance: 5000 sats
+ for i in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx {
+ let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat);
+ if let Err(_) = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)) { panic!("Unexpected event at dust HTLC {}", i); }
+ }
+ } else {
+ // Inbound dust threshold: 2031 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + counteparty's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
+ // Inbound dust balance: 5000 sats
+ for _ in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx {
+ route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ let dust_overflow = dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat * (dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx + 1);
+ if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward {
+ let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], if on_holder_tx { dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat });
+ let mut config = UserConfig::default();
+ // With default dust exposure: 5000 sats
+ if on_holder_tx {
+ let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1);
+ let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, assert_eq!(err, &format!("Cannot send value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat)));
+ } else {
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, assert_eq!(err, &format!("Cannot send value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", dust_overflow, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat)));
+ }
+ } else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception {
+ let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], if on_holder_tx { dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat });
+ nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0));
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
+ // With default dust exposure: 5000 sats
+ if on_holder_tx {
+ // Outbound dust balance: 6399 sats
+ let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1);
+ let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
+ } else {
+ // Outbound dust balance: 5200 sats
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", dust_overflow, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
+ }
+ } else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound {
+ let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 2_500_000);
+ if let Err(_) = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)) { panic!("Unexpected event at update_fee-swallowed HTLC", ); }
+ {
+ let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
+ *feerate_lock = *feerate_lock * 10;
+ }
+ nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), "Cannot afford to send new feerate at 2530 without infringing max dust htlc exposure".to_string(), 1);
+ }
+
+ let _ = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
+ added_monitors.clear();
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_max_dust_htlc_exposure() {
+ do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true);
+ do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true);
+ do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true);
+ do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false);
+ do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false);
+ do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false);
+ do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true);
+ do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false);
+ do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true);
+ do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false);
+ do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false);
+ do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true);
+}
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff