Rename `PaymentForwarded::fee_earned_msat` to `total_fee_earned_msat`
[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / ln / functional_tests.rs
index 5e90ee7e92e31d0005dd65b35ac22c68a9eb9c98..c98b7231a218a7e4416938a2930465e22da832db 100644 (file)
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ use crate::chain::chaininterface::LowerBoundedFeeEstimator;
 use crate::chain::channelmonitor;
 use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID, CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, ANTI_REORG_DELAY};
 use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
-use crate::sign::{EcdsaChannelSigner, EntropySource, SignerProvider};
+use crate::sign::{ecdsa::EcdsaChannelSigner, EntropySource, SignerProvider};
 use crate::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PathFailure, PaymentPurpose, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination, PaymentFailureReason};
 use crate::ln::{ChannelId, PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash};
 use crate::ln::channel::{commitment_tx_base_weight, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC, CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER, FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT, get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis, OutboundV1Channel, InboundV1Channel, COINBASE_MATURITY, ChannelPhase};
@@ -38,11 +38,12 @@ use crate::util::string::UntrustedString;
 use crate::util::config::{UserConfig, MaxDustHTLCExposure};
 
 use bitcoin::hash_types::BlockHash;
-use bitcoin::blockdata::script::{Builder, Script};
+use bitcoin::blockdata::locktime::absolute::LockTime;
+use bitcoin::blockdata::script::{Builder, ScriptBuf};
 use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes;
-use bitcoin::blockdata::constants::genesis_block;
+use bitcoin::blockdata::constants::ChainHash;
 use bitcoin::network::constants::Network;
-use bitcoin::{PackedLockTime, Sequence, Transaction, TxIn, TxOut, Witness};
+use bitcoin::{Sequence, Transaction, TxIn, TxOut, Witness};
 use bitcoin::OutPoint as BitcoinOutPoint;
 
 use bitcoin::secp256k1::Secp256k1;
@@ -81,7 +82,7 @@ fn test_insane_channel_opens() {
        let push_msat = (channel_value_sat - channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000;
 
        // Have node0 initiate a channel to node1 with aforementioned parameters
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_sat, push_msat, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_sat, push_msat, 42, None, None).unwrap();
 
        // Extract the channel open message from node0 to node1
        let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
@@ -135,7 +136,7 @@ fn test_funding_exceeds_no_wumbo_limit() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       match nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO + 1, 0, 42, None) {
+       match nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO + 1, 0, 42, None, None) {
                Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => {
                        assert_eq!(format!("funding_value must not exceed {}, it was {}", MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO, MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO + 1), err);
                },
@@ -161,7 +162,7 @@ fn do_test_counterparty_no_reserve(send_from_initiator: bool) {
        push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 4 * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000 * 1000;
        push_amt -= get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
 
-       let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, if send_from_initiator { 0 } else { push_amt }, 42, None).unwrap();
+       let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, if send_from_initiator { 0 } else { push_amt }, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let mut open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        if !send_from_initiator {
                open_channel_message.channel_reserve_satoshis = 0;
@@ -523,7 +524,7 @@ fn do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(steps: u8) {
        }
 
        if steps & 0x0f == 0 { return; }
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
 
        if steps & 0x0f == 1 { return; }
@@ -692,7 +693,7 @@ fn test_update_fee_that_funder_cannot_afford() {
                *feerate_lock += 4;
        }
        nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
-       nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot afford to send new feerate at {}", feerate + 4), 1);
+       nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel", format!("Cannot afford to send new feerate at {}", feerate + 4), 1);
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
 
        const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 281474976710654;
@@ -745,7 +746,7 @@ fn test_update_fee_that_funder_cannot_afford() {
                        &mut htlcs,
                        &local_chan.context.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable()
                );
-               local_chan_signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, Vec::new(), &secp_ctx).unwrap()
+               local_chan_signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, Vec::new(), Vec::new(), &secp_ctx).unwrap()
        };
 
        let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned {
@@ -767,7 +768,7 @@ fn test_update_fee_that_funder_cannot_afford() {
        //check to see if the funder, who sent the update_fee request, can afford the new fee (funder_balance >= fee+channel_reserve)
        //Should produce and error.
        nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commit_signed_msg);
-       nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee".to_string(), 1);
+       nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee", 3);
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
        check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: String::from("Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee") },
@@ -1338,9 +1339,9 @@ fn test_duplicate_htlc_different_direction_onchain() {
        for e in events {
                match e {
                        MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
-                       MessageSendEvent::HandleError { node_id, action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg } } => {
+                       MessageSendEvent::HandleError { node_id, action: msgs::ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { ref msg } } => {
                                assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
-                               assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain.");
+                               assert_eq!(msg.as_ref().unwrap().data, "Channel closed because commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain.");
                        },
                        MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
                                assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
@@ -1414,6 +1415,7 @@ fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() {
                cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
                onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
                skimmed_fee_msat: None,
+               blinding_point: None,
        };
 
        nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
@@ -1492,7 +1494,7 @@ fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() {
                        &mut vec![(accepted_htlc_info, ())],
                        &local_chan.context.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable()
                );
-               local_chan_signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, Vec::new(), &secp_ctx).unwrap()
+               local_chan_signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, Vec::new(), Vec::new(), &secp_ctx).unwrap()
        };
 
        let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned {
@@ -1527,7 +1529,7 @@ fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() {
                },
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
        };
-       nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(),
+       nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel",
                format!("Attempting to fail HTLC due to fee spike buffer violation in channel {}. Rebalancing is required.", raa_msg.channel_id), 1);
 
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
@@ -1610,11 +1612,12 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_outbound_channel() {
                cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
                onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
                skimmed_fee_msat: None,
+               blinding_point: None,
        };
 
        nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
        // Check that the payment failed and the channel is closed in response to the malicious UpdateAdd.
-       nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value".to_string(), 1);
+       nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value", 3);
        assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
        let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
        assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value");
@@ -1681,13 +1684,13 @@ fn test_chan_init_feerate_unaffordability() {
        // HTLC.
        let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
        push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64, &channel_type_features);
-       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, push_amt + 1, 42, None).unwrap_err(),
+       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, push_amt + 1, 42, None, None).unwrap_err(),
                APIError::APIMisuseError { err: "Funding amount (356) can't even pay fee for initial commitment transaction fee of 357.".to_string() });
 
        // During open, we don't have a "counterparty channel reserve" to check against, so that
        // requirement only comes into play on the open_channel handling side.
        push_amt -= get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, push_amt, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, push_amt, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let mut open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        open_channel_msg.push_msat += 1;
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
@@ -1788,11 +1791,12 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_inbound_chan() {
                cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
                onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
                skimmed_fee_msat: None,
+               blinding_point: None,
        };
 
        nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
        // Check that the payment failed and the channel is closed in response to the malicious UpdateAdd.
-       nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value".to_string(), 1);
+       nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value", 3);
        assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
        let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
        assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value");
@@ -1865,7 +1869,7 @@ fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() {
        // attempt to send amt_msat > their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat
        {
                let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
-                       .with_bolt11_features(nodes[2].node.invoice_features()).unwrap().with_max_channel_saturation_power_of_half(0);
+                       .with_bolt11_features(nodes[2].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap().with_max_channel_saturation_power_of_half(0);
                let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], payment_params, recv_value_0);
                route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat += 1;
                assert!(route.paths[0].hops.iter().rev().skip(1).all(|h| h.fee_msat == feemsat));
@@ -1890,7 +1894,7 @@ fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() {
                }
 
                let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
-                       .with_bolt11_features(nodes[2].node.invoice_features()).unwrap().with_max_channel_saturation_power_of_half(0);
+                       .with_bolt11_features(nodes[2].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap().with_max_channel_saturation_power_of_half(0);
                let route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, recv_value_0).unwrap();
                let (payment_preimage, ..) = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], recv_value_0);
                claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage);
@@ -2269,9 +2273,15 @@ fn channel_monitor_network_test() {
        nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_1.2, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
+       check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
        {
                let mut node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_1, None, HTLCType::NONE);
                assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
+               mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
+               if nodes[1].connect_style.borrow().updates_best_block_first() {
+                       let _ = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
+               }
+
                mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &node_txn[0]);
                check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
                test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan_1, Some(node_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::NONE);
@@ -2280,7 +2290,6 @@ fn channel_monitor_network_test() {
        assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
        assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
        check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
-       check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
 
        // One pending HTLC is discarded by the force-close:
        let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]], 3_000_000);
@@ -2369,7 +2378,7 @@ fn channel_monitor_network_test() {
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
                };
                match events[1] {
-                       MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. }, node_id } => {
+                       MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { .. }, node_id } => {
                                assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id());
                        },
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
@@ -2401,7 +2410,7 @@ fn channel_monitor_network_test() {
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
                };
                match events[1] {
-                       MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. }, node_id } => {
+                       MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { .. }, node_id } => {
                                assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id());
                        },
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
@@ -2589,8 +2598,8 @@ fn do_test_forming_justice_tx_from_monitor_updates(broadcast_initial_commitment:
        // that a revoked commitment transaction is broadcasted
        // (Similar to `revoked_output_claim` test but we get the justice tx + broadcast manually)
        let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
-       let destination_script0 = chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.get_destination_script().unwrap();
-       let destination_script1 = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_destination_script().unwrap();
+       let destination_script0 = chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.get_destination_script([0; 32]).unwrap();
+       let destination_script1 = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_destination_script([0; 32]).unwrap();
        let persisters = vec![WatchtowerPersister::new(destination_script0),
                WatchtowerPersister::new(destination_script1)];
        let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs_with_persisters(2, &chanmon_cfgs, persisters.iter().collect());
@@ -2860,8 +2869,8 @@ fn test_htlc_on_chain_success() {
        assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
        assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
        assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
-       assert_eq!(node_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0);
-       assert_eq!(node_txn[1].lock_time.0, 0);
+       assert_eq!(node_txn[0].lock_time, LockTime::ZERO);
+       assert_eq!(node_txn[1].lock_time, LockTime::ZERO);
 
        // Verify that B's ChannelManager is able to extract preimage from HTLC Success tx and pass it backward
        connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![commitment_tx[0].clone(), node_txn[0].clone(), node_txn[1].clone()]));
@@ -2880,8 +2889,10 @@ fn test_htlc_on_chain_success() {
        }
        let chan_id = Some(chan_1.2);
        match forwarded_events[1] {
-               Event::PaymentForwarded { fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx, next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat } => {
-                       assert_eq!(fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
+               Event::PaymentForwarded { total_fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx,
+                       next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat
+               } => {
+                       assert_eq!(total_fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
                        assert_eq!(prev_channel_id, chan_id);
                        assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, true);
                        assert_eq!(next_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
@@ -2890,8 +2901,10 @@ fn test_htlc_on_chain_success() {
                _ => panic!()
        }
        match forwarded_events[2] {
-               Event::PaymentForwarded { fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx, next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat } => {
-                       assert_eq!(fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
+               Event::PaymentForwarded { total_fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx,
+                       next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat
+               } => {
+                       assert_eq!(total_fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
                        assert_eq!(prev_channel_id, chan_id);
                        assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, true);
                        assert_eq!(next_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
@@ -2913,7 +2926,7 @@ fn test_htlc_on_chain_success() {
        let nodes_0_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
 
        match nodes_2_event {
-               MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. }, node_id: _ } => {},
+               MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { .. }, node_id: _ } => {},
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
        }
 
@@ -2942,8 +2955,8 @@ fn test_htlc_on_chain_success() {
                        // Node[0]: 2 * HTLC-timeout tx
                        check_spends!(node_txn[0], $commitment_tx);
                        check_spends!(node_txn[1], $commitment_tx);
-                       assert_ne!(node_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0);
-                       assert_ne!(node_txn[1].lock_time.0, 0);
+                       assert_ne!(node_txn[0].lock_time, LockTime::ZERO);
+                       assert_ne!(node_txn[1].lock_time, LockTime::ZERO);
                        if $htlc_offered {
                                assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
                                assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
@@ -2994,7 +3007,7 @@ fn test_htlc_on_chain_success() {
        assert_eq!(commitment_spend.input.len(), 2);
        assert_eq!(commitment_spend.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
        assert_eq!(commitment_spend.input[1].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
-       assert_eq!(commitment_spend.lock_time.0, nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
+       assert_eq!(commitment_spend.lock_time.to_consensus_u32(), nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
        assert!(commitment_spend.output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
        // We don't bother to check that B can claim the HTLC output on its commitment tx here as
        // we already checked the same situation with A.
@@ -3319,22 +3332,18 @@ fn do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(deliver_bs_raa: bool, use
 
        let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
        assert_eq!(events.len(), if deliver_bs_raa { 3 + nodes.len() - 1 } else { 4 + nodes.len() });
-       match events[0] {
-               Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => { },
-               _ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
-       }
-       match events[1] {
-               Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
-                       assert_eq!(*payment_hash, fourth_payment_hash);
-               },
-               _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
-       }
-       match events[2] {
-               Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
-                       assert_eq!(*payment_hash, fourth_payment_hash);
-               },
-               _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
-       }
+       assert!(events.iter().any(|ev| matches!(
+               ev,
+               Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. }
+       )));
+       assert!(events.iter().any(|ev| matches!(
+               ev,
+               Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } if *payment_hash == fourth_payment_hash
+       )));
+       assert!(events.iter().any(|ev| matches!(
+               ev,
+               Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } if *payment_hash == fourth_payment_hash
+       )));
 
        nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
@@ -3358,7 +3367,7 @@ fn do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(deliver_bs_raa: bool, use
 
        let nodes_2_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
        match nodes_2_event {
-               MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { msg: msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id, ref data } }, node_id: _ } => {
+               MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { msg: Some(msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id, ref data }) }, node_id: _ } => {
                        assert_eq!(channel_id, chan_2.2);
                        assert_eq!(data.as_str(), "Channel closed because commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain.");
                },
@@ -3509,6 +3518,7 @@ fn fail_backward_pending_htlc_upon_channel_failure() {
                        cltv_expiry,
                        onion_routing_packet,
                        skimmed_fee_msat: None,
+                       blinding_point: None,
                };
                nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_add_htlc);
        }
@@ -3551,7 +3561,7 @@ fn test_htlc_ignore_latest_remote_commitment() {
                // connect_style.
                return;
        }
-       create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
+       let funding_tx = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).3;
 
        route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 10000000);
        nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
@@ -3560,11 +3570,12 @@ fn test_htlc_ignore_latest_remote_commitment() {
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
        check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
 
-       let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
-       assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 3);
-       assert_eq!(node_txn[0].txid(), node_txn[1].txid());
+       let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.unique_txn_broadcast();
+       assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2);
+       check_spends!(node_txn[0], funding_tx);
+       check_spends!(node_txn[1], node_txn[0]);
 
-       let block = create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![node_txn[0].clone(), node_txn[1].clone()]);
+       let block = create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![node_txn[0].clone()]);
        connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
@@ -3621,7 +3632,7 @@ fn test_force_close_fail_back() {
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
        check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
-       let tx = {
+       let commitment_tx = {
                let mut node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
                // Note that we don't bother broadcasting the HTLC-Success transaction here as we don't
                // have a use for it unless nodes[2] learns the preimage somehow, the funds will go
@@ -3630,7 +3641,7 @@ fn test_force_close_fail_back() {
                node_txn.remove(0)
        };
 
-       mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &tx);
+       mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx);
 
        // Note no UpdateHTLCs event here from nodes[1] to nodes[0]!
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
@@ -3642,15 +3653,16 @@ fn test_force_close_fail_back() {
                get_monitor!(nodes[2], payment_event.commitment_msg.channel_id)
                        .provide_payment_preimage(&our_payment_hash, &our_payment_preimage, &node_cfgs[2].tx_broadcaster, &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(node_cfgs[2].fee_estimator), &node_cfgs[2].logger);
        }
-       mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &tx);
-       let node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
-       assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
-       assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
-       assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, tx.txid());
-       assert_eq!(node_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0); // Must be an HTLC-Success
-       assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.len(), 5); // Must be an HTLC-Success
+       mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &commitment_tx);
+       let mut node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
+       assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), if nodes[2].connect_style.borrow().updates_best_block_first() { 2 } else { 1 });
+       let htlc_tx = node_txn.pop().unwrap();
+       assert_eq!(htlc_tx.input.len(), 1);
+       assert_eq!(htlc_tx.input[0].previous_output.txid, commitment_tx.txid());
+       assert_eq!(htlc_tx.lock_time, LockTime::ZERO); // Must be an HTLC-Success
+       assert_eq!(htlc_tx.input[0].witness.len(), 5); // Must be an HTLC-Success
 
-       check_spends!(node_txn[0], tx);
+       check_spends!(htlc_tx, commitment_tx);
 }
 
 #[test]
@@ -3695,7 +3707,7 @@ fn test_peer_disconnected_before_funding_broadcasted() {
 
        // Open a channel between `nodes[0]` and `nodes[1]`, for which the funding transaction is never
        // broadcasted, even though it's created by `nodes[0]`.
-       let expected_temporary_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 500_000_000, 42, None).unwrap();
+       let expected_temporary_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 500_000_000, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel);
        let accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
@@ -4729,7 +4741,7 @@ fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_htlc_timeout_tx() {
        assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
        assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
        check_spends!(revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
-       assert_ne!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0); // HTLC-Timeout
+       assert_ne!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].lock_time, LockTime::ZERO); // HTLC-Timeout
 
        // B will generate justice tx from A's revoked commitment/HTLC tx
        connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone()]));
@@ -4892,7 +4904,7 @@ fn test_onchain_to_onchain_claim() {
        check_spends!(c_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
        assert_eq!(c_txn[0].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
        assert!(c_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
-       assert_eq!(c_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0); // Success tx
+       assert_eq!(c_txn[0].lock_time, LockTime::ZERO); // Success tx
 
        // So we broadcast C's commitment tx and HTLC-Success on B's chain, we should successfully be able to extract preimage and update downstream monitor
        connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![commitment_tx[0].clone(), c_txn[0].clone()]));
@@ -4904,8 +4916,10 @@ fn test_onchain_to_onchain_claim() {
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
        }
        match events[1] {
-               Event::PaymentForwarded { fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx, next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat } => {
-                       assert_eq!(fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
+               Event::PaymentForwarded { total_fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx,
+                       next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat
+               } => {
+                       assert_eq!(total_fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
                        assert_eq!(prev_channel_id, Some(chan_1.2));
                        assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, true);
                        assert_eq!(next_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
@@ -4920,7 +4934,7 @@ fn test_onchain_to_onchain_claim() {
        let nodes_0_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut msg_events);
 
        match nodes_2_event {
-               MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. }, node_id: _ } => {},
+               MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { .. }, node_id: _ } => {},
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
        }
 
@@ -4951,7 +4965,7 @@ fn test_onchain_to_onchain_claim() {
        check_spends!(b_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
        assert_eq!(b_txn[0].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
        assert!(b_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
-       assert_eq!(b_txn[0].lock_time.0, nodes[1].best_block_info().1); // Success tx
+       assert_eq!(b_txn[0].lock_time.to_consensus_u32(), nodes[1].best_block_info().1); // Success tx
 
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
@@ -4990,7 +5004,7 @@ fn test_duplicate_payment_hash_one_failure_one_success() {
        // script push size limit so that the below script length checks match
        // ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT.
        let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 40)
-               .with_bolt11_features(nodes[3].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
+               .with_bolt11_features(nodes[3].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
        let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[3], payment_params, 800_000);
        send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[0], route, &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], 800_000, duplicate_payment_hash, payment_secret);
 
@@ -5525,8 +5539,9 @@ fn test_key_derivation_params() {
        let chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &chanmon_cfgs[0].persister, &keys_manager);
        let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(Network::Testnet, &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger));
        let scorer = RwLock::new(test_utils::TestScorer::new());
-       let router = test_utils::TestRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), &scorer);
-       let node = NodeCfg { chain_source: &chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source, logger: &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, tx_broadcaster: &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, fee_estimator: &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, router, chain_monitor, keys_manager: &keys_manager, network_graph, node_seed: seed, override_init_features: alloc::rc::Rc::new(core::cell::RefCell::new(None)) };
+       let router = test_utils::TestRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, &scorer);
+       let message_router = test_utils::TestMessageRouter::new(network_graph.clone());
+       let node = NodeCfg { chain_source: &chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source, logger: &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, tx_broadcaster: &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, fee_estimator: &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, router, message_router, chain_monitor, keys_manager: &keys_manager, network_graph, node_seed: seed, override_init_features: alloc::rc::Rc::new(core::cell::RefCell::new(None)) };
        let mut node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
        node_cfgs.remove(0);
        node_cfgs.insert(0, node);
@@ -5786,14 +5801,14 @@ fn bolt2_open_channel_sending_node_checks_part1() { //This test needs to be on i
        // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must ensure temporary_channel_id is unique from any other channel ID with the same peer.
        let channel_value_satoshis=10000;
        let push_msat=10001;
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let node0_to_1_send_open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node0_to_1_send_open_channel);
        get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
 
        // Create a second channel with the same random values. This used to panic due to a colliding
        // channel_id, but now panics due to a colliding outbound SCID alias.
-       assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_err());
+       assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None, None).is_err());
 }
 
 #[test]
@@ -5806,18 +5821,18 @@ fn bolt2_open_channel_sending_node_checks_part2() {
        // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set funding_satoshis to less than 2^24 satoshis
        let channel_value_satoshis=2^24;
        let push_msat=10001;
-       assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_err());
+       assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None, None).is_err());
 
        // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set push_msat to equal or less than 1000 * funding_satoshis
        let channel_value_satoshis=10000;
        // Test when push_msat is equal to 1000 * funding_satoshis.
        let push_msat=1000*channel_value_satoshis+1;
-       assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_err());
+       assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None, None).is_err());
 
        // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set set channel_reserve_satoshis greater than or equal to dust_limit_satoshis
        let channel_value_satoshis=10000;
        let push_msat=10001;
-       assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_ok()); //Create a valid channel
+       assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None, None).is_ok()); //Create a valid channel
        let node0_to_1_send_open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        assert!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.channel_reserve_satoshis>=node0_to_1_send_open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis);
 
@@ -5830,8 +5845,8 @@ fn bolt2_open_channel_sending_node_checks_part2() {
        assert!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.to_self_delay==BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT);
 
        // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must ensure the chain_hash value identifies the chain it wishes to open the channel within.
-       let chain_hash=genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash();
-       assert_eq!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.chain_hash,chain_hash);
+       let chain_hash = ChainHash::using_genesis_block(Network::Testnet);
+       assert_eq!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.chain_hash, chain_hash);
 
        // BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set funding_pubkey, revocation_basepoint, htlc_basepoint, payment_basepoint, and delayed_payment_basepoint to valid DER-encoded, compressed, secp256k1 pubkeys.
        assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.funding_pubkey.serialize()).is_ok());
@@ -5850,7 +5865,7 @@ fn bolt2_open_channel_sane_dust_limit() {
 
        let channel_value_satoshis=1000000;
        let push_msat=10001;
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let mut node0_to_1_send_open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        node0_to_1_send_open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis = 547;
        node0_to_1_send_open_channel.channel_reserve_satoshis = 100001;
@@ -5925,7 +5940,7 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
        // us to surface its failure to the user.
        chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
        assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0);
-       nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 1 HTLC updates in channel {}", chan.2), 1);
+       nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel", format!("Freeing holding cell with 1 HTLC updates in channel {}", chan.2), 1);
 
        // Check that the payment failed to be sent out.
        let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
@@ -6013,7 +6028,7 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
        // to surface its failure to the user. The first payment should succeed.
        chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
        assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0);
-       nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 2 HTLC updates in channel {}", chan.2), 1);
+       nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel", format!("Freeing holding cell with 2 HTLC updates in channel {}", chan.2), 1);
 
        // Check that the second payment failed to be sent out.
        let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
@@ -6204,6 +6219,30 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free_multihop() {
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
 }
 
+#[test]
+fn test_payment_route_reaching_same_channel_twice() {
+       //A route should not go through the same channel twice
+       //It is enforced when constructing a route.
+       let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+       let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+       let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+       let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+       let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 0);
+
+       let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 0)
+               .with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
+       let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], payment_params, 100000000);
+
+       // Extend the path by itself, essentially simulating route going through same channel twice
+       let cloned_hops = route.paths[0].hops.clone();
+       route.paths[0].hops.extend_from_slice(&cloned_hops);
+
+       unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
+               RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
+       ), false, APIError::InvalidRoute { ref err },
+       assert_eq!(err, &"Path went through the same channel twice"));
+}
+
 // BOLT 2 Requirements for the Sender when constructing and sending an update_add_htlc message.
 // BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST NOT offer amount_msat it cannot pay for in the remote commitment transaction at the current feerate_per_kw (see "Updating Fees") while maintaining its channel reserve.
 //TODO: I don't believe this is explicitly enforced when sending an HTLC but as the Fee aspect of the BOLT specs is in flux leaving this as a TODO.
@@ -6263,7 +6302,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_zero_value_msat() {
        updates.update_add_htlcs[0].amount_msat = 0;
 
        nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
-       nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC".to_string(), 1);
+       nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC", 3);
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
        check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC".to_string() },
@@ -6281,7 +6320,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_cltv_expiry_too_high() {
        let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 0);
 
        let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 0)
-               .with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
+               .with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
        let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], payment_params, 100000000);
        route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().cltv_expiry_delta = 500000001;
        unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
@@ -6456,6 +6495,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_max_htlc_limit() {
                cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
                onion_routing_packet: onion_packet.clone(),
                skimmed_fee_msat: None,
+               blinding_point: None,
        };
 
        for i in 0..50 {
@@ -7122,7 +7162,7 @@ fn do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(revoked: bool, local: bool) {
                if !revoked {
                        assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
                } else {
-                       assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].lock_time.0, 11);
+                       assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].lock_time.to_consensus_u32(), 11);
                }
                // We fail non-dust-HTLC 2 by broadcast of local timeout/revocation-claim tx
                mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &timeout_tx[0]);
@@ -7156,7 +7196,7 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() {
        // We test config.our_to_self > BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT is enforced in OutboundV1Channel::new()
        if let Err(error) = OutboundV1Channel::new(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
                &nodes[0].keys_manager, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[1].node.init_features(), 1000000, 1000000, 0,
-               &low_our_to_self_config, 0, 42)
+               &low_our_to_self_config, 0, 42, None)
        {
                match error {
                        APIError::APIMisuseError { err } => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
@@ -7165,7 +7205,7 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() {
        } else { assert!(false) }
 
        // We test config.our_to_self > BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT is enforced in InboundV1Channel::new()
-       nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
        open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
        if let Err(error) = InboundV1Channel::new(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
@@ -7179,7 +7219,7 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() {
        } else { assert!(false); }
 
        // We test msg.to_self_delay <= config.their_to_self_delay is enforced in Chanel::accept_channel()
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
        let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
        accept_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
@@ -7197,7 +7237,7 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() {
        check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: reason_msg }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
 
        // We test msg.to_self_delay <= config.their_to_self_delay is enforced in InboundV1Channel::new()
-       nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
        open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
        if let Err(error) = InboundV1Channel::new(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
@@ -7227,8 +7267,8 @@ fn test_check_htlc_underpaying() {
 
        let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::new();
        let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
-       let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(),
-               TEST_FINAL_CLTV).with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
+       let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
+               .with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
        let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, 10_000);
        let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &route_params, &nodes[0].network_graph.read_only(),
                None, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &Default::default(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
@@ -7380,7 +7420,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_commitment() {
 
        let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
        let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 30)
-               .with_bolt11_features(nodes[0].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
+               .with_bolt11_features(nodes[0].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
        let (route,_, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_params, 3000000);
        send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3000000);
 
@@ -7416,7 +7456,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_commitment() {
                assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
                check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_txn[0]);
                let fee_1 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
-               feerate_1 = fee_1 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
+               feerate_1 = fee_1 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight().to_wu();
                penalty_1 = node_txn[0].txid();
                node_txn.clear();
        };
@@ -7436,7 +7476,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_commitment() {
                        // Verify new bumped tx is different from last claiming transaction, we don't want spurrious rebroadcast
                        assert_ne!(penalty_2, penalty_1);
                        let fee_2 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
-                       feerate_2 = fee_2 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
+                       feerate_2 = fee_2 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight().to_wu();
                        // Verify 25% bump heuristic
                        assert!(feerate_2 * 100 >= feerate_1 * 125);
                        node_txn.clear();
@@ -7459,7 +7499,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_commitment() {
                        // Verify new bumped tx is different from last claiming transaction, we don't want spurrious rebroadcast
                        assert_ne!(penalty_3, penalty_2);
                        let fee_3 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
-                       feerate_3 = fee_3 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
+                       feerate_3 = fee_3 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight().to_wu();
                        // Verify 25% bump heuristic
                        assert!(feerate_3 * 100 >= feerate_2 * 125);
                        node_txn.clear();
@@ -7484,14 +7524,15 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_htlcs() {
 
        let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000);
        // Lock HTLC in both directions (using a slightly lower CLTV delay to provide timely RBF bumps)
-       let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 50).with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
+       let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 50).with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
        let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::new();
        let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
        let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, 3_000_000);
        let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &route_params, &nodes[0].network_graph.read_only(), None,
                nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &Default::default(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
        let payment_preimage = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
-       let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 50).with_bolt11_features(nodes[0].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
+       let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 50)
+               .with_bolt11_features(nodes[0].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
        let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, 3_000_000);
        let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &route_params, &nodes[1].network_graph.read_only(), None,
                nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &Default::default(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
@@ -7577,7 +7618,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_htlcs() {
                first = node_txn[3].txid();
                // Store both feerates for later comparison
                let fee_1 = revoked_htlc_txn[0].output[0].value + revoked_htlc_txn[1].output[0].value - node_txn[3].output[0].value;
-               feerate_1 = fee_1 * 1000 / node_txn[3].weight() as u64;
+               feerate_1 = fee_1 * 1000 / node_txn[3].weight().to_wu();
                penalty_txn = vec![node_txn[2].clone()];
                node_txn.clear();
        }
@@ -7601,7 +7642,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_htlcs() {
                // Verify bumped tx is different and 25% bump heuristic
                assert_ne!(first, node_txn[0].txid());
                let fee_2 = revoked_htlc_txn[0].output[0].value + revoked_htlc_txn[1].output[0].value - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
-               let feerate_2 = fee_2 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
+               let feerate_2 = fee_2 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight().to_wu();
                assert!(feerate_2 * 100 > feerate_1 * 125);
                let txn = vec![node_txn[0].clone()];
                node_txn.clear();
@@ -7677,7 +7718,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_remote_commitment() {
                preimage = node_txn[0].txid();
                let index = node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout;
                let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
-               feerate_preimage = fee * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
+               feerate_preimage = fee * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight().to_wu();
 
                let (preimage_bump_tx, timeout_tx) = if node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output == node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output {
                        (node_txn[2].clone(), node_txn[1].clone())
@@ -7692,7 +7733,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_remote_commitment() {
                timeout = timeout_tx.txid();
                let index = timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout;
                let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - timeout_tx.output[0].value;
-               feerate_timeout = fee * 1000 / timeout_tx.weight() as u64;
+               feerate_timeout = fee * 1000 / timeout_tx.weight().to_wu();
 
                node_txn.clear();
        };
@@ -7711,13 +7752,13 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_remote_commitment() {
 
                let index = preimage_bump.input[0].previous_output.vout;
                let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - preimage_bump.output[0].value;
-               let new_feerate = fee * 1000 / preimage_bump.weight() as u64;
+               let new_feerate = fee * 1000 / preimage_bump.weight().to_wu();
                assert!(new_feerate * 100 > feerate_timeout * 125);
                assert_ne!(timeout, preimage_bump.txid());
 
                let index = node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout;
                let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
-               let new_feerate = fee * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
+               let new_feerate = fee * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight().to_wu();
                assert!(new_feerate * 100 > feerate_preimage * 125);
                assert_ne!(preimage, node_txn[0].txid());
 
@@ -7860,9 +7901,9 @@ fn test_channel_conf_timeout() {
        let close_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
        assert_eq!(close_ev.len(), 1);
        match close_ev[0] {
-               MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, ref node_id } => {
+               MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { ref msg }, ref node_id } => {
                        assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
-                       assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because funding transaction failed to confirm within 2016 blocks");
+                       assert_eq!(msg.as_ref().unwrap().data, "Channel closed because funding transaction failed to confirm within 2016 blocks");
                },
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
        }
@@ -7879,7 +7920,7 @@ fn test_override_channel_config() {
        let mut override_config = UserConfig::default();
        override_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 200;
 
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 16_000_000, 12_000_000, 42, Some(override_config)).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 16_000_000, 12_000_000, 42, None, Some(override_config)).unwrap();
 
        // Assert the channel created by node0 is using the override config.
        let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
@@ -7896,7 +7937,7 @@ fn test_override_0msat_htlc_minimum() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(zero_config.clone())]);
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 16_000_000, 12_000_000, 42, Some(zero_config)).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 16_000_000, 12_000_000, 42, None, Some(zero_config)).unwrap();
        let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        assert_eq!(res.htlc_minimum_msat, 1);
 
@@ -7966,7 +8007,7 @@ fn test_manually_accept_inbound_channel_request() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(manually_accept_conf.clone())]);
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
+       let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
        let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
 
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
@@ -8016,7 +8057,7 @@ fn test_manually_reject_inbound_channel_request() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(manually_accept_conf.clone())]);
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
        let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
 
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
@@ -8056,7 +8097,7 @@ fn test_can_not_accept_inbound_channel_twice() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(manually_accept_conf.clone())]);
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
        let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
 
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
@@ -8178,8 +8219,10 @@ fn test_onion_value_mpp_set_calculation() {
                                RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), height + 1, &None).unwrap();
                        // Edit amt_to_forward to simulate the sender having set
                        // the final amount and the routing node taking less fee
-                       if let msgs::OutboundOnionPayload::Receive { ref mut amt_msat, .. } = onion_payloads[1] {
-                               *amt_msat = 99_000;
+                       if let msgs::OutboundOnionPayload::Receive {
+                               ref mut sender_intended_htlc_amt_msat, ..
+                       } = onion_payloads[1] {
+                               *sender_intended_htlc_amt_msat = 99_000;
                        } else { panic!() }
                        let new_onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash).unwrap();
                        payment_event.msgs[0].onion_routing_packet = new_onion_packet;
@@ -8537,10 +8580,11 @@ fn test_concurrent_monitor_claim() {
        watchtower_alice.chain_monitor.block_connected(&block, HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST);
 
        // Watchtower Alice should have broadcast a commitment/HTLC-timeout
-       let alice_state = {
+       {
                let mut txn = alice_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
                assert_eq!(txn.len(), 2);
-               txn.remove(0)
+               check_spends!(txn[0], chan_1.3);
+               check_spends!(txn[1], txn[0]);
        };
 
        // Copy ChainMonitor to simulate watchtower Bob and make it receive a commitment update first.
@@ -8609,11 +8653,8 @@ fn test_concurrent_monitor_claim() {
        check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
        {
                let htlc_txn = alice_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
-               assert_eq!(htlc_txn.len(), 2);
+               assert_eq!(htlc_txn.len(), 1);
                check_spends!(htlc_txn[0], bob_state_y);
-               // Alice doesn't clean up the old HTLC claim since it hasn't seen a conflicting spend for
-               // it. However, she should, because it now has an invalid parent.
-               check_spends!(htlc_txn[1], alice_state);
        }
 }
 
@@ -8636,7 +8677,7 @@ fn test_pre_lockin_no_chan_closed_update() {
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
        // Create an initial channel
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
        let accept_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
@@ -8649,11 +8690,11 @@ fn test_pre_lockin_no_chan_closed_update() {
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
 
        let funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
-       let channel_id = crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index }.to_channel_id();
+       let channel_id = ChannelId::v1_from_funding_outpoint(crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index });
        nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id, data: "Hi".to_owned() });
        assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
        check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 2, ClosureReason::CounterpartyForceClosed { peer_msg: UntrustedString("Hi".to_string()) }, true,
-               [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(); 2], 100000);
+               [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
 }
 
 #[test]
@@ -8852,7 +8893,12 @@ fn do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(broadcast_alice: bool, go_onchain
                        assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 1);
                        check_spends!(bob_txn[0], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
                } else {
-                       assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 2);
+                       if nodes[1].connect_style.borrow().updates_best_block_first() {
+                               assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 3);
+                               assert_eq!(bob_txn[0].txid(), bob_txn[1].txid());
+                       } else {
+                               assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 2);
+                       }
                        check_spends!(bob_txn[0], chan_ab.3);
                }
        }
@@ -8868,15 +8914,16 @@ fn do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(broadcast_alice: bool, go_onchain
                // If Alice force-closed, Bob only broadcasts a HTLC-output-claiming transaction. Otherwise,
                // Bob force-closed and broadcasts the commitment transaction along with a
                // HTLC-output-claiming transaction.
-               let bob_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
+               let mut bob_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
                if broadcast_alice {
                        assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 1);
                        check_spends!(bob_txn[0], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
                        assert_eq!(bob_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), script_weight);
                } else {
-                       assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 2);
-                       check_spends!(bob_txn[1], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
-                       assert_eq!(bob_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), script_weight);
+                       assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), if nodes[1].connect_style.borrow().updates_best_block_first() { 3 } else { 2 });
+                       let htlc_tx = bob_txn.pop().unwrap();
+                       check_spends!(htlc_tx, txn_to_broadcast[0]);
+                       assert_eq!(htlc_tx.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), script_weight);
                }
        }
 }
@@ -8899,11 +8946,11 @@ fn test_duplicate_temporary_channel_id_from_different_peers() {
        let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
        // Create an first channel channel
-       nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let mut open_chan_msg_chan_1_0 = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
 
        // Create an second channel
-       nodes[2].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 43, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[2].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 43, None, None).unwrap();
        let mut open_chan_msg_chan_2_0 = get_event_msg!(nodes[2], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
 
        // Modify the `OpenChannel` from `nodes[2]` to `nodes[0]` to ensure that it uses the same
@@ -8939,6 +8986,149 @@ fn test_duplicate_temporary_channel_id_from_different_peers() {
        }
 }
 
+#[test]
+fn test_peer_funding_sidechannel() {
+       // Test that if a peer somehow learns which txid we'll use for our channel funding before we
+       // receive `funding_transaction_generated` the peer cannot cause us to crash. We'd previously
+       // assumed that LDK would receive `funding_transaction_generated` prior to our peer learning
+       // the txid and panicked if the peer tried to open a redundant channel to us with the same
+       // funding outpoint.
+       //
+       // While this assumption is generally safe, some users may have out-of-band protocols where
+       // they notify their LSP about a funding outpoint first, or this may be violated in the future
+       // with collaborative transaction construction protocols, i.e. dual-funding.
+       let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
+       let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
+       let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
+       let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+       let temp_chan_id_ab = exchange_open_accept_chan(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 1_000_000, 0);
+       let temp_chan_id_ca = exchange_open_accept_chan(&nodes[2], &nodes[0], 1_000_000, 0);
+
+       let (_, tx, funding_output) =
+               create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 42);
+
+       let cs_funding_events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+       assert_eq!(cs_funding_events.len(), 1);
+       match cs_funding_events[0] {
+               Event::FundingGenerationReady { .. } => {}
+               _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", cs_funding_events),
+       }
+
+       nodes[2].node.funding_transaction_generated_unchecked(&temp_chan_id_ca, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone(), funding_output.index).unwrap();
+       let funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[2], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[0].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msg);
+       get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+       expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+       let res = nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temp_chan_id_ab, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone());
+       let err_msg = format!("{:?}", res.unwrap_err());
+       assert!(err_msg.contains("An existing channel using outpoint "));
+       assert!(err_msg.contains(" is open with peer"));
+       // Even though the last funding_transaction_generated errored, it still generated a
+       // SendFundingCreated. However, when the peer responds with a funding_signed it will send the
+       // appropriate error message.
+       let as_funding_created = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_funding_created);
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+       expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+       let reason = ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: format!("An existing channel using outpoint {} is open with peer {}", funding_output, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), };
+       check_closed_events(&nodes[0], &[ExpectedCloseEvent::from_id_reason(ChannelId::v1_from_funding_outpoint(funding_output), true, reason)]);
+
+       let funding_signed = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed);
+       get_err_msg(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_duplicate_conflicting_funding_from_second_peer() {
+       // Test that if a user tries to fund a channel with a funding outpoint they'd previously used
+       // we don't try to remove the previous ChannelMonitor. This is largely a test to ensure we
+       // don't regress in the fuzzer, as such funding getting passed our outpoint-matches checks
+       // implies the user (and our counterparty) has reused cryptographic keys across channels, which
+       // we require the user not do.
+       let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
+       let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
+       let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
+       let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+       let temp_chan_id = exchange_open_accept_chan(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 1_000_000, 0);
+
+       let (_, tx, funding_output) =
+               create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 42);
+
+       // Now that we have a funding outpoint, create a dummy `ChannelMonitor` and insert it into
+       // nodes[0]'s ChainMonitor so that the initial `ChannelMonitor` write fails.
+       let dummy_chan_id = create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[2], &nodes[3]).3;
+       let dummy_monitor = get_monitor!(nodes[2], dummy_chan_id).clone();
+       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.watch_channel(funding_output, dummy_monitor).unwrap();
+
+       nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temp_chan_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
+
+       let mut funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msg);
+       let funding_signed_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+       expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+       nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed_msg);
+       // At this point, the channel should be closed, after having generated one monitor write (the
+       // watch_channel call which failed), but zero monitor updates.
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+       get_err_msg(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       let err_reason = ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Channel funding outpoint was a duplicate".to_owned() };
+       check_closed_events(&nodes[0], &[ExpectedCloseEvent::from_id_reason(funding_signed_msg.channel_id, true, err_reason)]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_duplicate_funding_err_in_funding() {
+       // Test that if we have a live channel with one peer, then another peer comes along and tries
+       // to create a second channel with the same txid we'll fail and not overwrite the
+       // outpoint_to_peer map in `ChannelManager`.
+       //
+       // This was previously broken.
+       let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
+       let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
+       let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
+       let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+       let (_, _, _, real_channel_id, funding_tx) = create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+       let real_chan_funding_txo = chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
+       assert_eq!(ChannelId::v1_from_funding_outpoint(real_chan_funding_txo), real_channel_id);
+
+       nodes[2].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None, None).unwrap();
+       let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[2], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       let node_c_temp_chan_id = open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id;
+       open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id = real_channel_id;
+       nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
+       let mut accept_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+       accept_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id = node_c_temp_chan_id;
+       nodes[2].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_chan_msg);
+
+       // Now that we have a second channel with the same funding txo, send a bogus funding message
+       // and let nodes[1] remove the inbound channel.
+       let (_, funding_tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[2], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 42);
+
+       nodes[2].node.funding_transaction_generated(&node_c_temp_chan_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), funding_tx).unwrap();
+
+       let mut funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[2], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       funding_created_msg.temporary_channel_id = real_channel_id;
+       // Make the signature invalid by changing the funding output
+       funding_created_msg.funding_output_index += 10;
+       nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msg);
+       get_err_msg(&nodes[1], &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+       let err = "Invalid funding_created signature from peer".to_owned();
+       let reason = ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err };
+       let expected_closing = ExpectedCloseEvent::from_id_reason(real_channel_id, false, reason);
+       check_closed_events(&nodes[1], &[expected_closing]);
+
+       assert_eq!(
+               *nodes[1].node.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap().get(&real_chan_funding_txo).unwrap(),
+               nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()
+       );
+}
+
 #[test]
 fn test_duplicate_chan_id() {
        // Test that if a given peer tries to open a channel with the same channel_id as one that is
@@ -8954,7 +9144,7 @@ fn test_duplicate_chan_id() {
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
        // Create an initial channel
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
        nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
@@ -8997,7 +9187,7 @@ fn test_duplicate_chan_id() {
        let funding_signed_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
 
        let funding_outpoint = crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index };
-       let channel_id = funding_outpoint.to_channel_id();
+       let channel_id = ChannelId::v1_from_funding_outpoint(funding_outpoint);
 
        // Now we have the first channel past funding_created (ie it has a txid-based channel_id, not a
        // temporary one).
@@ -9022,13 +9212,13 @@ fn test_duplicate_chan_id() {
        }
 
        // Now try to create a second channel which has a duplicate funding output.
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let open_chan_2_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_2_msg);
        nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
        create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42); // Get and check the FundingGenerationReady event
 
-       let (_, funding_created) = {
+       let funding_created = {
                let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
                let mut a_peer_state = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
                // Once we call `get_funding_created` the channel has a duplicate channel_id as
@@ -9036,12 +9226,12 @@ fn test_duplicate_chan_id() {
                // try to create another channel. Instead, we drop the channel entirely here (leaving the
                // channelmanager in a possibly nonsense state instead).
                match a_peer_state.channel_by_id.remove(&open_chan_2_msg.temporary_channel_id).unwrap() {
-                       ChannelPhase::UnfundedOutboundV1(chan) => {
+                       ChannelPhase::UnfundedOutboundV1(mut chan) => {
                                let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
                                chan.get_funding_created(tx.clone(), funding_outpoint, false, &&logger).map_err(|_| ()).unwrap()
                        },
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected ChannelPhase variant"),
-               }
+               }.unwrap()
        };
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
        nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created);
@@ -9049,6 +9239,12 @@ fn test_duplicate_chan_id() {
        // without trying to persist the `ChannelMonitor`.
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
 
+       check_closed_events(&nodes[1], &[
+               ExpectedCloseEvent::from_id_reason(funding_created.temporary_channel_id, false, ClosureReason::ProcessingError {
+                       err: "Already had channel with the new channel_id".to_owned()
+               })
+       ]);
+
        // ...still, nodes[1] will reject the duplicate channel.
        {
                let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
@@ -9170,7 +9366,7 @@ fn test_invalid_funding_tx() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 10_000, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 10_000, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
        nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
 
@@ -9181,10 +9377,10 @@ fn test_invalid_funding_tx() {
        // a panic as we'd try to extract a 32 byte preimage from a witness element without checking
        // its length.
        let mut wit_program: Vec<u8> = channelmonitor::deliberately_bogus_accepted_htlc_witness_program();
-       let wit_program_script: Script = wit_program.into();
+       let wit_program_script: ScriptBuf = wit_program.into();
        for output in tx.output.iter_mut() {
                // Make the confirmed funding transaction have a bogus script_pubkey
-               output.script_pubkey = Script::new_v0_p2wsh(&wit_program_script.wscript_hash());
+               output.script_pubkey = ScriptBuf::new_v0_p2wsh(&wit_program_script.wscript_hash());
        }
 
        nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated_unchecked(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone(), 0).unwrap();
@@ -9212,8 +9408,8 @@ fn test_invalid_funding_tx() {
        assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
        if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { node_id, action } = &events_2[0] {
                assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
-               if let msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { msg } = action {
-                       assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because of an exception: ".to_owned() + expected_err);
+               if let msgs::ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { msg } = action {
+                       assert_eq!(msg.as_ref().unwrap().data, "Channel closed because of an exception: ".to_owned() + expected_err);
                } else { panic!(); }
        } else { panic!(); }
        assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
@@ -9222,19 +9418,19 @@ fn test_invalid_funding_tx() {
        // long the ChannelMonitor will try to read 32 bytes from the second-to-last element, panicing
        // as its not 32 bytes long.
        let mut spend_tx = Transaction {
-               version: 2i32, lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO,
+               version: 2i32, lock_time: LockTime::ZERO,
                input: tx.output.iter().enumerate().map(|(idx, _)| TxIn {
                        previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint {
                                txid: tx.txid(),
                                vout: idx as u32,
                        },
-                       script_sig: Script::new(),
+                       script_sig: ScriptBuf::new(),
                        sequence: Sequence::ENABLE_RBF_NO_LOCKTIME,
-                       witness: Witness::from_vec(channelmonitor::deliberately_bogus_accepted_htlc_witness())
+                       witness: Witness::from_slice(&channelmonitor::deliberately_bogus_accepted_htlc_witness())
                }).collect(),
                output: vec![TxOut {
                        value: 1000,
-                       script_pubkey: Script::new(),
+                       script_pubkey: ScriptBuf::new(),
                }]
        };
        check_spends!(spend_tx, tx);
@@ -9255,7 +9451,7 @@ fn test_coinbase_funding_tx() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
 
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel);
@@ -9352,8 +9548,12 @@ fn do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(test_height_before_t
                // We should broadcast an HTLC transaction spending our funding transaction first
                let spending_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
                assert_eq!(spending_txn.len(), 2);
-               assert_eq!(spending_txn[0].txid(), node_txn[0].txid());
-               check_spends!(spending_txn[1], node_txn[0]);
+               let htlc_tx = if spending_txn[0].txid() == node_txn[0].txid() {
+                       &spending_txn[1]
+               } else {
+                       &spending_txn[0]
+               };
+               check_spends!(htlc_tx, node_txn[0]);
                // We should also generate a SpendableOutputs event with the to_self output (as its
                // timelock is up).
                let descriptor_spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
@@ -9363,7 +9563,7 @@ fn do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(test_height_before_t
                // should immediately fail-backwards the HTLC to the previous hop, without waiting for an
                // additional block built on top of the current chain.
                nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.transactions_confirmed(
-                       &nodes[1].get_block_header(conf_height + 1), &[(0, &spending_txn[1])], conf_height + 1);
+                       &nodes[1].get_block_header(conf_height + 1), &[(0, htlc_tx)], conf_height + 1);
                expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: channel_id }]);
                check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
 
@@ -9394,7 +9594,7 @@ fn do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(test_for_second_fail_panic: bool) {
        let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
 
        let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
-               .with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
+               .with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
        let route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, 10_000).unwrap();
 
        let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[1]);
@@ -9503,7 +9703,7 @@ fn test_inconsistent_mpp_params() {
        let chan_2_3 =create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, 100_000, 0);
 
        let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
-               .with_bolt11_features(nodes[3].node.invoice_features()).unwrap();
+               .with_bolt11_features(nodes[3].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
        let mut route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, 15_000_000).unwrap();
        assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
        route.paths.sort_by(|path_a, _| {
@@ -9690,7 +9890,7 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config), None]);
        let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 500_000_000, 42, None).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 500_000_000, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        open_channel.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 50_000_000;
        open_channel.max_accepted_htlcs = 60;
@@ -9812,10 +10012,10 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e
                        // Outbound dust balance: 6399 sats
                        let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1);
                        let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
-                       nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
+                       nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel", format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
                } else {
                        // Outbound dust balance: 5200 sats
-                       nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(),
+                       nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel",
                                format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx",
                                        dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat * (dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx - 1) + dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat + 4,
                                        max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
@@ -9872,7 +10072,7 @@ fn test_non_final_funding_tx() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+       let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
        let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
@@ -9882,12 +10082,12 @@ fn test_non_final_funding_tx() {
 
        let chan_id = *nodes[0].network_chan_count.borrow();
        let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
-       let input = TxIn { previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint::null(), script_sig: bitcoin::Script::new(), sequence: Sequence(1), witness: Witness::from_vec(vec!(vec!(1))) };
+       let input = TxIn { previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint::null(), script_sig: bitcoin::ScriptBuf::new(), sequence: Sequence(1), witness: Witness::from_slice(&[&[1]]) };
        assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
        let mut tx = match events[0] {
                Event::FundingGenerationReady { ref channel_value_satoshis, ref output_script, .. } => {
                        // Timelock the transaction _beyond_ the best client height + 1.
-                       Transaction { version: chan_id as i32, lock_time: PackedLockTime(best_height + 2), input: vec![input], output: vec![TxOut {
+                       Transaction { version: chan_id as i32, lock_time: LockTime::from_height(best_height + 2).unwrap(), input: vec![input], output: vec![TxOut {
                                value: *channel_value_satoshis, script_pubkey: output_script.clone(),
                        }]}
                },
@@ -9917,7 +10117,7 @@ fn test_non_final_funding_tx_within_headroom() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+       let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
        let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
@@ -9927,12 +10127,12 @@ fn test_non_final_funding_tx_within_headroom() {
 
        let chan_id = *nodes[0].network_chan_count.borrow();
        let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
-       let input = TxIn { previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint::null(), script_sig: bitcoin::Script::new(), sequence: Sequence(1), witness: Witness::from_vec(vec!(vec!(1))) };
+       let input = TxIn { previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint::null(), script_sig: bitcoin::ScriptBuf::new(), sequence: Sequence(1), witness: Witness::from_slice(&[[1]]) };
        assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
        let mut tx = match events[0] {
                Event::FundingGenerationReady { ref channel_value_satoshis, ref output_script, .. } => {
                        // Timelock the transaction within a +1 headroom from the best block.
-                       Transaction { version: chan_id as i32, lock_time: PackedLockTime(best_height + 1), input: vec![input], output: vec![TxOut {
+                       Transaction { version: chan_id as i32, lock_time: LockTime::from_consensus(best_height + 1), input: vec![input], output: vec![TxOut {
                                value: *channel_value_satoshis, script_pubkey: output_script.clone(),
                        }]}
                },
@@ -10014,7 +10214,7 @@ fn accept_busted_but_better_fee() {
                MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, .. }, .. } => {
                        nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
                        check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError {
-                               err: "Peer's feerate much too low. Actual: 1000. Our expected lower limit: 5000 (- 250)".to_owned() },
+                               err: "Peer's feerate much too low. Actual: 1000. Our expected lower limit: 5000".to_owned() },
                                [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
                        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
                        check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
@@ -10217,7 +10417,7 @@ fn test_remove_expired_outbound_unfunded_channels() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+       let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
        let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
@@ -10268,7 +10468,7 @@ fn test_remove_expired_inbound_unfunded_channels() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+       let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None, None).unwrap();
        let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
        let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
@@ -10441,7 +10641,7 @@ fn test_batch_channel_open() {
 
        // Complete the persistence of the monitor.
        nodes[0].chain_monitor.complete_sole_pending_chan_update(
-               &OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 1 }.to_channel_id()
+               &ChannelId::v1_from_funding_outpoint(OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 1 })
        );
        let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
 
@@ -10496,28 +10696,26 @@ fn test_disconnect_in_funding_batch() {
        nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
 
        // The channels in the batch will close immediately.
-       let channel_id_1 = OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 0 }.to_channel_id();
-       let channel_id_2 = OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 1 }.to_channel_id();
-       let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
-       assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
-       assert!(events.iter().any(|e| matches!(
-               e,
-               Event::ChannelClosed {
-                       channel_id,
-                       ..
-               } if channel_id == &channel_id_1
-       )));
-       assert!(events.iter().any(|e| matches!(
-               e,
-               Event::ChannelClosed {
-                       channel_id,
-                       ..
-               } if channel_id == &channel_id_2
-       )));
-       assert_eq!(events.iter().filter(|e| matches!(
-               e,
-               Event::DiscardFunding { .. },
-       )).count(), 2);
+       let funding_txo_1 = OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 0 };
+       let funding_txo_2 = OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 1 };
+       let channel_id_1 = ChannelId::v1_from_funding_outpoint(funding_txo_1);
+       let channel_id_2 = ChannelId::v1_from_funding_outpoint(funding_txo_2);
+       check_closed_events(&nodes[0], &[
+               ExpectedCloseEvent {
+                       channel_id: Some(channel_id_1),
+                       discard_funding: true,
+                       channel_funding_txo: Some(funding_txo_1),
+                       user_channel_id: Some(42),
+                       ..Default::default()
+               },
+               ExpectedCloseEvent {
+                       channel_id: Some(channel_id_2),
+                       discard_funding: true,
+                       channel_funding_txo: Some(funding_txo_2),
+                       user_channel_id: Some(43),
+                       ..Default::default()
+               },
+       ]);
 
        // The monitor should become closed.
        check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
@@ -10572,8 +10770,10 @@ fn test_batch_funding_close_after_funding_signed() {
        assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast().len(), 0);
 
        // Force-close the channel for which we've completed the initial monitor.
-       let channel_id_1 = OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 0 }.to_channel_id();
-       let channel_id_2 = OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 1 }.to_channel_id();
+       let funding_txo_1 = OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 0 };
+       let funding_txo_2 = OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 1 };
+       let channel_id_1 = ChannelId::v1_from_funding_outpoint(funding_txo_1);
+       let channel_id_2 = ChannelId::v1_from_funding_outpoint(funding_txo_2);
        nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&channel_id_1, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
        check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 2);
        {
@@ -10601,26 +10801,22 @@ fn test_batch_funding_close_after_funding_signed() {
        }
 
        // All channels in the batch should close immediately.
-       let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
-       assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
-       assert!(events.iter().any(|e| matches!(
-               e,
-               Event::ChannelClosed {
-                       channel_id,
-                       ..
-               } if channel_id == &channel_id_1
-       )));
-       assert!(events.iter().any(|e| matches!(
-               e,
-               Event::ChannelClosed {
-                       channel_id,
-                       ..
-               } if channel_id == &channel_id_2
-       )));
-       assert_eq!(events.iter().filter(|e| matches!(
-               e,
-               Event::DiscardFunding { .. },
-       )).count(), 2);
+       check_closed_events(&nodes[0], &[
+               ExpectedCloseEvent {
+                       channel_id: Some(channel_id_1),
+                       discard_funding: true,
+                       channel_funding_txo: Some(funding_txo_1),
+                       user_channel_id: Some(42),
+                       ..Default::default()
+               },
+               ExpectedCloseEvent {
+                       channel_id: Some(channel_id_2),
+                       discard_funding: true,
+                       channel_funding_txo: Some(funding_txo_2),
+                       user_channel_id: Some(43),
+                       ..Default::default()
+               },
+       ]);
 
        // Ensure the channels don't exist anymore.
        assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
@@ -10637,7 +10833,7 @@ fn do_test_funding_and_commitment_tx_confirm_same_block(confirm_remote_commitmen
        let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
        let funding_tx = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_init(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 1_000_000, 0);
-       let chan_id = chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 }.to_channel_id();
+       let chan_id = ChannelId::v1_from_funding_outpoint(chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 });
 
        assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
        assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
@@ -10652,7 +10848,7 @@ fn do_test_funding_and_commitment_tx_confirm_same_block(confirm_remote_commitmen
        let mut msg_events = closing_node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
        assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
        match msg_events.pop().unwrap() {
-               MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. }, .. } => {},
+               MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: msgs::ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { .. }, .. } => {},
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
        }
        check_added_monitors(closing_node, 1);