+// This file is Copyright its original authors, visible in version control
+// history.
+//
+// This file is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE
+// or http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
+// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your option.
+// You may not use this file except in accordance with one or both of these
+// licenses.
+
//! Tests that test standing up a network of ChannelManagers, creating channels, sending
//! payments/messages between them, and often checking the resulting ChannelMonitors are able to
//! claim outputs on-chain.
use routing::router::{Route, RouteHop, get_route};
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs;
-use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler,RoutingMessageHandler,HTLCFailChannelUpdate, ErrorAction};
+use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler,RoutingMessageHandler,HTLCFailChannelUpdate, ErrorAction, OptionalField};
use util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingChannelKeys;
use util::{byte_utils, test_utils};
use util::events::{Event, EventsProvider, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider};
use bitcoin::secp256k1::{Secp256k1, Message};
use bitcoin::secp256k1::key::{PublicKey,SecretKey};
+use regex;
+
use std::collections::{BTreeSet, HashMap, HashSet};
use std::default::Default;
use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
use std::{mem, io};
use ln::functional_test_utils::*;
+use ln::chan_utils::PreCalculatedTxCreationKeys;
#[test]
fn test_insane_channel_opens() {
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &message_mutator(open_channel_message.clone()));
let msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
+ let expected_regex = regex::Regex::new(expected_error_str).unwrap();
if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref action, .. } = msg_events[0] {
match action {
&ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. } => {
- nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), expected_error_str.to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[1].logger.assert_log_regex("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), expected_regex, 1);
},
_ => panic!("unexpected event!"),
}
use ln::channelmanager::MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT;
// Test all mutations that would make the channel open message insane
- insane_open_helper("funding value > 2^24", |mut msg| { msg.funding_satoshis = MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS; msg });
+ insane_open_helper(format!("Funding must be smaller than {}. It was {}", MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS, MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS).as_str(), |mut msg| { msg.funding_satoshis = MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS; msg });
insane_open_helper("Bogus channel_reserve_satoshis", |mut msg| { msg.channel_reserve_satoshis = msg.funding_satoshis + 1; msg });
- insane_open_helper("push_msat larger than funding value", |mut msg| { msg.push_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000 + 1; msg });
+ insane_open_helper(r"push_msat \d+ was larger than funding value \d+", |mut msg| { msg.push_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000 + 1; msg });
insane_open_helper("Peer never wants payout outputs?", |mut msg| { msg.dust_limit_satoshis = msg.funding_satoshis + 1 ; msg });
- insane_open_helper("Bogus; channel reserve is less than dust limit", |mut msg| { msg.dust_limit_satoshis = msg.channel_reserve_satoshis + 1; msg });
+ insane_open_helper(r"Bogus; channel reserve \(\d+\) is less than dust limit \(\d+\)", |mut msg| { msg.dust_limit_satoshis = msg.channel_reserve_satoshis + 1; msg });
- insane_open_helper("Minimum htlc value is full channel value", |mut msg| { msg.htlc_minimum_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000; msg });
+ insane_open_helper(r"Minimum htlc value \(\d+\) was larger than full channel value \(\d+\)", |mut msg| { msg.htlc_minimum_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000; msg });
insane_open_helper("They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period", |mut msg| { msg.to_self_delay = MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT + 1; msg });
- insane_open_helper("0 max_accpted_htlcs makes for a useless channel", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 0; msg });
+ insane_open_helper("0 max_accepted_htlcs makes for a useless channel", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 0; msg });
- insane_open_helper("max_accpted_htlcs > 483", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 484; msg });
+ insane_open_helper("max_accepted_htlcs was 484. It must not be larger than 483", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 484; msg });
}
#[test]
route_over_limit(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], 3000000);
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 0);
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_regex("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap(), 1);
//TODO: Test that routes work again here as we've been notified that the channel is full
{
let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[1].net_graph_msg_handler;
let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &Vec::new(), 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
- unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash_1, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err },
- assert_eq!(err, "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs"));
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash_1, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs".to_string(), 1);
}
// This should also be true if we try to forward a payment.
let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None).err().unwrap();
match err {
PaymentSendFailure::AllFailedRetrySafe(ref fails) => {
- match fails[0] {
- APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} =>
- assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value"),
+ match &fails[0] {
+ &APIError::ChannelUnavailable{ref err} =>
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)),
_ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"),
}
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"),
}
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value".to_string(), 1);
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1]], max_can_send, max_can_send);
}
let chan_keys = local_chan.get_local_keys();
let pubkeys = chan_keys.pubkeys();
(pubkeys.revocation_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint, pubkeys.payment_point,
- chan_keys.commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER), chan_keys.commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2))
+ chan_keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER), chan_keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2))
};
let (remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, remote_htlc_basepoint, remote_payment_point, remote_secret1) = {
let chan_lock = nodes[1].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
let chan_keys = remote_chan.get_local_keys();
let pubkeys = chan_keys.pubkeys();
(pubkeys.delayed_payment_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint, pubkeys.payment_point,
- chan_keys.commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1))
+ chan_keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1))
};
// Assemble the set of keys we can use for signatures for our commitment_signed message.
let local_chan_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
let local_chan = local_chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
let local_chan_keys = local_chan.get_local_keys();
- local_chan_keys.sign_remote_commitment(feerate_per_kw, &commit_tx, &commit_tx_keys, &[&accepted_htlc_info],
- BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, &secp_ctx).unwrap()
+ let pre_commit_tx_keys = PreCalculatedTxCreationKeys::new(commit_tx_keys);
+ local_chan_keys.sign_remote_commitment(feerate_per_kw, &commit_tx, &pre_commit_tx_keys, &[&accepted_htlc_info], &secp_ctx).unwrap()
};
let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned {
};
let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(1000);
- unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err },
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put them under remote channel reserve value"));
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put them under remote channel reserve value".to_string(), 1);
{
let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_0 + 1);
assert!(route.paths[0].iter().rev().skip(1).all(|h| h.fee_msat == feemsat));
- unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err },
- assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept"));
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept".to_string(), 1);
}
// channel reserve is bigger than their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat so loop to deplete
let recv_value_2 = stat01.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat_1 - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs;
{
let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_2 + 1);
- unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err },
- assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value"));
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
}
// test with outbound holding cell amount > 0
{
let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_22+1);
- unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err },
- assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value"));
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value".to_string(), 2);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value".to_string(), 2);
}
let (route_22, our_payment_hash_22, our_payment_preimage_22) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_22);
let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None).err().unwrap();
match err {
PaymentSendFailure::AllFailedRetrySafe(ref fails) => {
- match fails[0] {
- APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} =>
- assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value"),
+ match &fails[0] {
+ &APIError::ChannelUnavailable{ref err} =>
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)),
_ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"),
}
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"),
}
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value".to_string(), 3);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value".to_string(), 3);
}
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1], &nodes[2]][..], recv_value_3, recv_value_3);
flags: 0,
cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
fee_base_msat: 0,
fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
excess_data: vec![],
assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.delayed_payment_basepoint.serialize()).is_ok());
}
+// Test that if we fail to send an HTLC that is being freed from the holding cell, and the HTLC
+// originated from our node, its failure is surfaced to the user. We trigger this failure to
+// free the HTLC by increasing our fee while the HTLC is in the holding cell such that the HTLC
+// is no longer affordable once it's freed.
+#[test]
+fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+ let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+
+ // First nodes[0] generates an update_fee, setting the channel's
+ // pending_update_fee.
+ nodes[0].node.update_fee(chan.2, get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan.2) + 20).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
+ (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
+
+ let mut chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan.2);
+ let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
+ let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan.2);
+
+ // 2* and +1 HTLCs on the commit tx fee calculation for the fee spike reserve.
+ let (_, our_payment_hash) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1);
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler;
+ let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], max_can_send, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
+
+ // Send a payment which passes reserve checks but gets stuck in the holding cell.
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None).unwrap();
+ chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan.2);
+ assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, max_can_send);
+
+ // Flush the pending fee update.
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
+ let (as_revoke_and_ack, _) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ // Upon receipt of the RAA, there will be an attempt to resend the holding cell
+ // HTLC, but now that the fee has been raised the payment will now fail, causing
+ // us to surface its failure to the user.
+ chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan.2);
+ assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), "Freeing holding cell with 1 HTLC updates".to_string(), 1);
+ let failure_log = format!("Failed to send HTLC with payment_hash {} due to Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value ({})", log_bytes!(our_payment_hash.0), chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), failure_log.to_string(), 1);
+
+ // Check that the payment failed to be sent out.
+ let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match &events[0] {
+ &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
+ assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
+ assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
+ assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
+ assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+}
+
+// Test that if multiple HTLCs are released from the holding cell and one is
+// valid but the other is no longer valid upon release, the valid HTLC can be
+// successfully completed while the other one fails as expected.
+#[test]
+fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+ let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+
+ // First nodes[0] generates an update_fee, setting the channel's
+ // pending_update_fee.
+ nodes[0].node.update_fee(chan.2, get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan.2) + 200).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
+ (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
+
+ let mut chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan.2);
+ let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
+ let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan.2);
+
+ // 2* and +1 HTLCs on the commit tx fee calculation for the fee spike reserve.
+ let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ let amt_1 = 20000;
+ let (_, payment_hash_2) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ let amt_2 = 5000000 - channel_reserve - 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 2 + 1) - amt_1;
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler;
+ let route_1 = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], amt_1, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
+ let route_2 = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], amt_2, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
+
+ // Send 2 payments which pass reserve checks but get stuck in the holding cell.
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route_1, payment_hash_1, &None).unwrap();
+ chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan.2);
+ assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, amt_1);
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route_2, payment_hash_2, &None).unwrap();
+ chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan.2);
+ assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, amt_1 + amt_2);
+
+ // Flush the pending fee update.
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
+ let (revoke_and_ack, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_and_ack);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 2);
+
+ // Upon receipt of the RAA, there will be an attempt to resend the holding cell HTLCs,
+ // but now that the fee has been raised the second payment will now fail, causing us
+ // to surface its failure to the user. The first payment should succeed.
+ chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan.2);
+ assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), "Freeing holding cell with 2 HTLC updates".to_string(), 1);
+ let failure_log = format!("Failed to send HTLC with payment_hash {} due to Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value ({})", log_bytes!(payment_hash_2.0), chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), failure_log.to_string(), 1);
+
+ // Check that the second payment failed to be sent out.
+ let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match &events[0] {
+ &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
+ assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
+ assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
+ assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
+ assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+
+ // Complete the first payment and the RAA from the fee update.
+ let (payment_event, send_raa_event) = {
+ let mut msgs = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(msgs.len(), 2);
+ (SendEvent::from_event(msgs.remove(0)), msgs.remove(0))
+ };
+ let raa = match send_raa_event {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { msg, .. } => msg,
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match events[0] {
+ Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => {},
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match events[0] {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { .. } => {},
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1, &None, amt_1);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let update_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], update_msgs.commitment_signed, false, true);
+ let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match events[0] {
+ Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage } => {
+ assert_eq!(*payment_preimage, payment_preimage_1);
+ }
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+}
+
+// Test that if we fail to forward an HTLC that is being freed from the holding cell that the
+// HTLC is failed backwards. We trigger this failure to forward the freed HTLC by increasing
+// our fee while the HTLC is in the holding cell such that the HTLC is no longer affordable
+// once it's freed.
+#[test]
+fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free_multihop() {
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
+ let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+ let chan_0_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let chan_1_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 100000, 95000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+
+ // First nodes[1] generates an update_fee, setting the channel's
+ // pending_update_fee.
+ nodes[1].node.update_fee(chan_1_2.2, get_feerate!(nodes[1], chan_1_2.2) + 20).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
+ (update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+
+ nodes[2].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
+
+ let mut chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan_0_1.2);
+ let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
+ let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan_0_1.2);
+
+ // Send a payment which passes reserve checks but gets stuck in the holding cell.
+ let feemsat = 239;
+ let total_routing_fee_msat = (nodes.len() - 2) as u64 * feemsat;
+ let (_, our_payment_hash) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1) - total_routing_fee_msat;
+ let payment_event = {
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler;
+ let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], max_can_send, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+
+ SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
+ };
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+
+ chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], chan_1_2.2);
+ assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, max_can_send);
+
+ // Flush the pending fee update.
+ nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
+ let (raa, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
+
+ // A final RAA message is generated to finalize the fee update.
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+
+ let raa_msg = match &events[0] {
+ &MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref msg, .. } => {
+ msg.clone()
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+
+ nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa_msg);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+ assert!(nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
+
+ // nodes[1]'s ChannelManager will now signal that we have HTLC forwards to process.
+ let process_htlc_forwards_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(process_htlc_forwards_event.len(), 1);
+ match &process_htlc_forwards_event[0] {
+ &Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => {},
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+
+ // In response, we call ChannelManager's process_pending_htlc_forwards
+ nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ // This causes the HTLC to be failed backwards.
+ let fail_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(fail_event.len(), 1);
+ let (fail_msg, commitment_signed) = match &fail_event[0] {
+ &MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref updates, .. } => {
+ assert_eq!(updates.update_add_htlcs.len(), 0);
+ assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 0);
+ assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 0);
+ assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ (updates.update_fail_htlcs[0].clone(), updates.commitment_signed.clone())
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+
+ // Pass the failure messages back to nodes[0].
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_msg);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
+
+ // Complete the HTLC failure+removal process.
+ let (raa, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
+ let final_raa_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(final_raa_event.len(), 1);
+ let raa = match &final_raa_event[0] {
+ &MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref msg, .. } => msg.clone(),
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+ nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
+ let fail_msg_event = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(fail_msg_event.len(), 1);
+ match &fail_msg_event[0] {
+ &MessageSendEvent::PaymentFailureNetworkUpdate { .. } => {},
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ let failure_event = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(failure_event.len(), 1);
+ match &failure_event[0] {
+ &Event::PaymentFailed { rejected_by_dest, .. } => {
+ assert!(!rejected_by_dest);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+}
+
// BOLT 2 Requirements for the Sender when constructing and sending an update_add_htlc message.
// BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST NOT offer amount_msat it cannot pay for in the remote commitment transaction at the current feerate_per_kw (see "Updating Fees") while maintaining its channel reserve.
//TODO: I don't believe this is explicitly enforced when sending an HTLC but as the Fee aspect of the BOLT specs is in flux leaving this as a TODO.
let mut route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
route.paths[0][0].fee_msat = 100;
- unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err },
- assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value"));
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value".to_string(), 1);
}
#[test]
let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
let mut route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
route.paths[0][0].fee_msat = 0;
- unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err },
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC"));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC".to_string(), 1);
}
#[test]
let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler;
let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 100000000, 500000001, &logger).unwrap();
- unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::RouteError { err },
- assert_eq!(err, "Channel CLTV overflowed?!"));
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::RouteError { ref err },
+ assert_eq!(err, &"Channel CLTV overflowed?"));
}
#[test]
let (_, our_payment_hash) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler;
let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
- unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err },
- assert_eq!(err, "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs"));
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs".to_string(), 1);
}
#[test]
let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler;
let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], max_in_flight+1, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
- unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err },
- assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept"));
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept".to_string(), 1);
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], max_in_flight, max_in_flight);
}
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
- assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote side tried to send less than our minimum HTLC value");
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote side tried to send less than our minimum HTLC value\. Lower limit: \(\d+\)\. Actual: \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
}
assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
- assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote tried to push more than our max accepted HTLCs");
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to push more than our max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
}
assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
- assert_eq!(err_msg.data,"Remote HTLC add would put them over our max HTLC value");
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new("Remote HTLC add would put them over our max HTLC value").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
}
assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
- assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote skipped HTLC ID");
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote skipped HTLC ID \(skipped ID: \d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
}
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
- assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC before it had been committed");
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
}
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
- assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC before it had been committed");
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
}
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
- assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC before it had been committed");
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
}
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
- assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote tried to fulfill HTLC with an incorrect preimage");
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill HTLC \(\d+\) with an incorrect preimage").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
}
node_0_shutdown.scriptpubkey = Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script().to_p2sh();
// Test we enforce upfront_scriptpbukey if by providing a diffrent one at closing that we disconnect peer
nodes[2].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_0_shutdown);
- assert_eq!(check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true).unwrap().data, "Got shutdown request with a scriptpubkey which did not match their previous scriptpubkey");
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Got shutdown request with a scriptpubkey \([A-Fa-f0-9]+\) which did not match their previous scriptpubkey.").unwrap().is_match(check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true).unwrap().data.as_str()));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
// We test that in case of peer committing upfront to a script, if it doesn't change at closing, we sign
let keys_manager: Arc<KeysInterface<ChanKeySigner = EnforcingChannelKeys>> = Arc::new(test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&nodes[0].node_seed, Network::Testnet));
if let Err(error) = Channel::new_outbound(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 }, &keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 0, &low_our_to_self_config) {
match error {
- APIError::APIMisuseError { err } => { assert_eq!(err, "Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay putting user funds at risks"); },
+ APIError::APIMisuseError { err } => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
} else { assert!(false) }
open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 }, &keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &low_our_to_self_config) {
match error {
- ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert_eq!(err, "Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay putting user funds at risks"); },
+ ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
} else { assert!(false); }
if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref action, .. } = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events()[0] {
match action {
&ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg } => {
- assert_eq!(msg.data,"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period");
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(msg.data.as_str()));
},
_ => { assert!(false); }
}
open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 }, &keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &high_their_to_self_config) {
match error {
- ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert_eq!(err, "They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period"); },
+ ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
} else { assert!(false); }
let local_keys = &guard.by_id.get_mut(&channel_id).unwrap().local_keys;
const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = (1 << 48) - 1;
let next_per_commitment_point = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(),
- &SecretKey::from_slice(&local_keys.commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2)).unwrap());
- let per_commitment_secret = local_keys.commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER);
+ &SecretKey::from_slice(&local_keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2)).unwrap());
+ let per_commitment_secret = local_keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER);
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(),
&msgs::RevokeAndACK { channel_id, per_commitment_secret, next_per_commitment_point });
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff