Don't fail HTLCs in revoked commitment txn until we spend them
[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / ln / functional_tests.rs
index a716d80677c56a313b1e3fffef985a6a0eddfe89..ddab3353e718fe7a7f25dcdc01354205a999eb2d 100644 (file)
@@ -2515,10 +2515,10 @@ fn claim_htlc_outputs_shared_tx() {
        let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
 
        // Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
-       send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
+       send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8_000_000);
        // node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim both offered/received HTLC outputs on top of commitment tx
-       let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
-       let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3000000);
+       let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
+       let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
 
        // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from node[0]
        let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
@@ -2541,9 +2541,9 @@ fn claim_htlc_outputs_shared_tx() {
                check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
                check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
                connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
-               expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, true);
+               assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
 
-               let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+               let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
                assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2); // ChannelMonitor: penalty tx, ChannelManager: local commitment
 
                assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Claim the revoked output + both revoked HTLC outputs
@@ -2560,7 +2560,13 @@ fn claim_htlc_outputs_shared_tx() {
 
                // Next nodes[1] broadcasts its current local tx state:
                assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
-               assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid()); //Spending funding tx unique txouput, tx broadcasted by ChannelManager
+               check_spends!(node_txn[1], chan_1.3);
+
+               // Finally, mine the penalty transaction and check that we get an HTLC failure after
+               // ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
+               mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
+               connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
+               expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, true);
        }
        get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
        assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
@@ -2579,11 +2585,11 @@ fn claim_htlc_outputs_single_tx() {
        let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
 
        // Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
-       send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
+       send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8_000_000);
        // node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim both offered/received HTLC outputs on top of commitment tx, but this
        // time as two different claim transactions as we're gonna to timeout htlc with given a high current height
-       let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
-       let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _payment_secret_2) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3000000);
+       let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
+       let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _payment_secret_2) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
 
        // Get the will-be-revoked local txn from node[0]
        let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
@@ -2605,9 +2611,9 @@ fn claim_htlc_outputs_single_tx() {
                }
 
                connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
-               expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, true);
+               assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
 
-               let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+               let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
                assert!(node_txn.len() == 9 || node_txn.len() == 10);
 
                // Check the pair local commitment and HTLC-timeout broadcast due to HTLC expiration
@@ -2635,6 +2641,14 @@ fn claim_htlc_outputs_single_tx() {
                assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(0).next().unwrap(), 77); // revoked to_local
                assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(1).next().unwrap(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked offered HTLC
                assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(2).next().unwrap(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked received HTLC
+
+               // Finally, mine the penalty transactions and check that we get an HTLC failure after
+               // ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
+               mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[2]);
+               mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[3]);
+               mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[4]);
+               connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
+               expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, true);
        }
        get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
        assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
@@ -7282,37 +7296,25 @@ fn do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(revoked: bool, local: bool) {
                check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
                check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
                assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
+
                connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 1); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
-               timeout_tx.push(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap()[1].clone());
+               timeout_tx = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().drain(..)
+                       .filter(|tx| tx.input[0].previous_output.txid == bs_commitment_tx[0].txid()).collect();
+               check_spends!(timeout_tx[0], bs_commitment_tx[0]);
+               // For both a revoked or non-revoked commitment transaction, after ANTI_REORG_DELAY the
+               // dust HTLC should have been failed.
+               expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], dust_hash, true);
+
                if !revoked {
-                       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], dust_hash, true);
                        assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
-                       // We fail non-dust-HTLC 2 by broadcast of local timeout tx on remote commitment tx
-                       mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &timeout_tx[0]);
-                       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
-                       connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
-                       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], non_dust_hash, true);
                } else {
-                       // If revoked, both dust & non-dust HTLCs should have been failed after ANTI_REORG_DELAY confs of revoked
-                       // commitment tx
-                       let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
-                       assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
-                       let first;
-                       match events[0] {
-                               Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
-                                       if payment_hash == dust_hash { first = true; }
-                                       else { first = false; }
-                               },
-                               _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
-                       }
-                       match events[1] {
-                               Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
-                                       if first { assert_eq!(payment_hash, non_dust_hash); }
-                                       else { assert_eq!(payment_hash, dust_hash); }
-                               },
-                               _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
-                       }
+                       assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].lock_time, 0);
                }
+               // We fail non-dust-HTLC 2 by broadcast of local timeout/revocation-claim tx
+               mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &timeout_tx[0]);
+               assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
+               connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
+               expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], non_dust_hash, true);
        }
 }