Implement finding paths for MPP
[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / ln / functional_tests.rs
index c71811fa8801b7f0cad95d49b32804fcb4eda034..eef89d1b413cd36704d7ec6a6957f586c00e729e 100644 (file)
@@ -1960,7 +1960,8 @@ fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() {
 
        // attempt to send amt_msat > their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat
        {
-               let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_0 + 1);
+               let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_0);
+               route.paths[0].last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat += 1;
                assert!(route.paths[0].iter().rev().skip(1).all(|h| h.fee_msat == feemsat));
                unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
                        assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
@@ -3523,7 +3524,7 @@ fn test_force_close_fail_back() {
        {
                let mut monitors = nodes[2].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap();
                monitors.get_mut(&OutPoint{ txid: Txid::from_slice(&payment_event.commitment_msg.channel_id[..]).unwrap(), index: 0 }).unwrap()
-                       .provide_payment_preimage(&our_payment_hash, &our_payment_preimage);
+                       .provide_payment_preimage(&our_payment_hash, &our_payment_preimage, &node_cfgs[2].tx_broadcaster, &node_cfgs[2].fee_estimator, &&logger);
        }
        connect_block(&nodes[2], &block, 1);
        let node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
@@ -4307,6 +4308,7 @@ fn test_no_txn_manager_serialize_deserialize() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let logger: test_utils::TestLogger;
        let fee_estimator: test_utils::TestFeeEstimator;
+       let persister: test_utils::TestPersister;
        let new_chain_monitor: test_utils::TestChainMonitor;
        let keys_manager: test_utils::TestKeysInterface;
        let nodes_0_deserialized: ChannelManager<EnforcingChannelKeys, &test_utils::TestChainMonitor, &test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &test_utils::TestLogger>;
@@ -4318,11 +4320,12 @@ fn test_no_txn_manager_serialize_deserialize() {
 
        let nodes_0_serialized = nodes[0].node.encode();
        let mut chan_0_monitor_serialized = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write_for_disk(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.serialize_for_disk(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
 
        logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
        fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 };
-       new_chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(nodes[0].chain_source), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), &logger, &fee_estimator);
+       persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
+       new_chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(nodes[0].chain_source), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), &logger, &fee_estimator, &persister);
        nodes[0].chain_monitor = &new_chain_monitor;
        let mut chan_0_monitor_read = &chan_0_monitor_serialized.0[..];
        let (_, mut chan_0_monitor) = <(BlockHash, ChannelMonitor<EnforcingChannelKeys>)>::read(&mut chan_0_monitor_read).unwrap();
@@ -4380,6 +4383,7 @@ fn test_manager_serialize_deserialize_events() {
        let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let fee_estimator: test_utils::TestFeeEstimator;
+       let persister: test_utils::TestPersister;
        let logger: test_utils::TestLogger;
        let new_chain_monitor: test_utils::TestChainMonitor;
        let keys_manager: test_utils::TestKeysInterface;
@@ -4425,11 +4429,12 @@ fn test_manager_serialize_deserialize_events() {
        // Start the de/seriailization process mid-channel creation to check that the channel manager will hold onto events that are serialized
        let nodes_0_serialized = nodes[0].node.encode();
        let mut chan_0_monitor_serialized = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write_for_disk(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.serialize_for_disk(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
 
        fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 };
        logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
-       new_chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(nodes[0].chain_source), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), &logger, &fee_estimator);
+       persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
+       new_chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(nodes[0].chain_source), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), &logger, &fee_estimator, &persister);
        nodes[0].chain_monitor = &new_chain_monitor;
        let mut chan_0_monitor_read = &chan_0_monitor_serialized.0[..];
        let (_, mut chan_0_monitor) = <(BlockHash, ChannelMonitor<EnforcingChannelKeys>)>::read(&mut chan_0_monitor_read).unwrap();
@@ -4502,6 +4507,7 @@ fn test_simple_manager_serialize_deserialize() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let logger: test_utils::TestLogger;
        let fee_estimator: test_utils::TestFeeEstimator;
+       let persister: test_utils::TestPersister;
        let new_chain_monitor: test_utils::TestChainMonitor;
        let keys_manager: test_utils::TestKeysInterface;
        let nodes_0_deserialized: ChannelManager<EnforcingChannelKeys, &test_utils::TestChainMonitor, &test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &test_utils::TestLogger>;
@@ -4515,11 +4521,12 @@ fn test_simple_manager_serialize_deserialize() {
 
        let nodes_0_serialized = nodes[0].node.encode();
        let mut chan_0_monitor_serialized = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write_for_disk(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.serialize_for_disk(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
 
        logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
        fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 };
-       new_chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(nodes[0].chain_source), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), &logger, &fee_estimator);
+       persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
+       new_chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(nodes[0].chain_source), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), &logger, &fee_estimator, &persister);
        nodes[0].chain_monitor = &new_chain_monitor;
        let mut chan_0_monitor_read = &chan_0_monitor_serialized.0[..];
        let (_, mut chan_0_monitor) = <(BlockHash, ChannelMonitor<EnforcingChannelKeys>)>::read(&mut chan_0_monitor_read).unwrap();
@@ -4561,6 +4568,7 @@ fn test_manager_serialize_deserialize_inconsistent_monitor() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
        let logger: test_utils::TestLogger;
        let fee_estimator: test_utils::TestFeeEstimator;
+       let persister: test_utils::TestPersister;
        let new_chain_monitor: test_utils::TestChainMonitor;
        let keys_manager: test_utils::TestKeysInterface;
        let nodes_0_deserialized: ChannelManager<EnforcingChannelKeys, &test_utils::TestChainMonitor, &test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &test_utils::TestLogger>;
@@ -4572,7 +4580,7 @@ fn test_manager_serialize_deserialize_inconsistent_monitor() {
        let mut node_0_stale_monitors_serialized = Vec::new();
        for monitor in nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter() {
                let mut writer = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-               monitor.1.write_for_disk(&mut writer).unwrap();
+               monitor.1.serialize_for_disk(&mut writer).unwrap();
                node_0_stale_monitors_serialized.push(writer.0);
        }
 
@@ -4591,13 +4599,14 @@ fn test_manager_serialize_deserialize_inconsistent_monitor() {
        let mut node_0_monitors_serialized = Vec::new();
        for monitor in nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter() {
                let mut writer = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-               monitor.1.write_for_disk(&mut writer).unwrap();
+               monitor.1.serialize_for_disk(&mut writer).unwrap();
                node_0_monitors_serialized.push(writer.0);
        }
 
        logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
        fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 };
-       new_chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(nodes[0].chain_source), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), &logger, &fee_estimator);
+       persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
+       new_chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(nodes[0].chain_source), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), &logger, &fee_estimator, &persister);
        nodes[0].chain_monitor = &new_chain_monitor;
 
        let mut node_0_stale_monitors = Vec::new();
@@ -4708,6 +4717,7 @@ macro_rules! check_spendable_outputs {
                                                                                input: vec![input],
                                                                                output: vec![outp],
                                                                        };
+                                                                       spend_tx.output[0].value -= (spend_tx.get_weight() + 2 + 1 + 73 + 35 + 3) as u64 / 4; // (Max weight + 3 (to round up)) / 4
                                                                        let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
                                                                        let keys = $keysinterface.derive_channel_keys($chan_value, key_derivation_params.0, key_derivation_params.1);
                                                                        let remotepubkey = keys.pubkeys().payment_point;
@@ -4742,6 +4752,7 @@ macro_rules! check_spendable_outputs {
 
                                                                                let delayed_payment_pubkey = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &delayed_payment_key);
                                                                                let witness_script = chan_utils::get_revokeable_redeemscript(revocation_pubkey, *to_self_delay, &delayed_payment_pubkey);
+                                                                               spend_tx.output[0].value -= (spend_tx.get_weight() + 2 + 1 + 73 + 1 + witness_script.len() + 1 + 3) as u64 / 4; // (Max weight + 3 (to round up)) / 4
                                                                                let sighash = Message::from_slice(&bip143::SigHashCache::new(&spend_tx).signature_hash(0, &witness_script, output.value, SigHashType::All)[..]).unwrap();
                                                                                let local_delayedsig = secp_ctx.sign(&sighash, &delayed_payment_key);
                                                                                spend_tx.input[0].witness.push(local_delayedsig.serialize_der().to_vec());
@@ -4769,6 +4780,7 @@ macro_rules! check_spendable_outputs {
                                                                                input: vec![input],
                                                                                output: vec![outp.clone()],
                                                                        };
+                                                                       spend_tx.output[0].value -= (spend_tx.get_weight() + 2 + 1 + 73 + 35 + 3) as u64 / 4; // (Max weight + 3 (to round up)) / 4
                                                                        let secret = {
                                                                                match ExtendedPrivKey::new_master(Network::Testnet, &$node.node_seed) {
                                                                                        Ok(master_key) => {
@@ -5739,7 +5751,7 @@ fn test_key_derivation_params() {
        // We manually create the node configuration to backup the seed.
        let seed = [42; 32];
        let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&seed, Network::Testnet);
-       let chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator);
+       let chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &chanmon_cfgs[0].persister);
        let node = NodeCfg { chain_source: &chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source, logger: &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, tx_broadcaster: &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, fee_estimator: &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, chain_monitor, keys_manager, node_seed: seed };
        let mut node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
        node_cfgs.remove(0);
@@ -6461,7 +6473,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_cltv_expiry_too_high() {
        let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
-       let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+       let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
        let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
 
        let (_, our_payment_hash) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
@@ -6533,9 +6545,13 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_exceed_max_htlc_value_in_flight() {
        send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], max_in_flight, max_in_flight);
 
        let (_, our_payment_hash) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
-       let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler;
-       let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
-       let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], max_in_flight+1, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
+       // Manually create a route over our max in flight (which our router normally automatically
+       // limits us to.
+       let route = Route { paths: vec![vec![RouteHop {
+          pubkey: nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), node_features: NodeFeatures::known(), channel_features: ChannelFeatures::known(),
+          short_channel_id: nodes[1].node.list_usable_channels()[0].short_channel_id.unwrap(),
+          fee_msat: max_in_flight + 1, cltv_expiry_delta: TEST_FINAL_CLTV
+       }]] };
        unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
                assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
 
@@ -7154,60 +7170,6 @@ fn test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment() {
        do_test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment(false);
 }
 
-#[test]
-fn test_no_failure_dust_htlc_local_commitment() {
-       // Transaction filters for failing back dust htlc based on local commitment txn infos has been
-       // prone to error, we test here that a dummy transaction don't fail them.
-
-       let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
-       let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
-       let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
-       let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
-       let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
-
-       // Rebalance a bit
-       send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
-
-       let as_dust_limit = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
-       let bs_dust_limit = nodes[1].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
-
-       // We route 2 dust-HTLCs between A and B
-       let (preimage_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], bs_dust_limit*1000);
-       let (preimage_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], as_dust_limit*1000);
-
-       // Build a dummy invalid transaction trying to spend a commitment tx
-       let input = TxIn {
-               previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint { txid: chan.3.txid(), vout: 0 },
-               script_sig: Script::new(),
-               sequence: 0,
-               witness: Vec::new(),
-       };
-
-       let outp = TxOut {
-               script_pubkey: Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(),
-               value: 10000,
-       };
-
-       let dummy_tx = Transaction {
-               version: 2,
-               lock_time: 0,
-               input: vec![input],
-               output: vec![outp]
-       };
-
-       let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: Default::default(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
-       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.block_connected(&header, &[(0, &dummy_tx)], 1);
-       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
-       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().len(), 0);
-       // We broadcast a few more block to check everything is all right
-       connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 20, 1, true, header.block_hash());
-       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
-       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().len(), 0);
-
-       claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], preimage_1, bs_dust_limit*1000);
-       claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], preimage_2, as_dust_limit*1000);
-}
-
 fn do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(revoked: bool, local: bool) {
        // Outbound HTLC-failure updates must be cancelled if we get a reorg before we reach ANTI_REORG_DELAY.
        // Broadcast of revoked remote commitment tx, trigger failure-update of dust/non-dust HTLCs
@@ -7458,6 +7420,7 @@ fn test_data_loss_protect() {
        // * we close channel in case of detecting other being fallen behind
        // * we are able to claim our own outputs thanks to to_remote being static
        let keys_manager;
+       let persister;
        let logger;
        let fee_estimator;
        let tx_broadcaster;
@@ -7474,7 +7437,7 @@ fn test_data_loss_protect() {
        // Cache node A state before any channel update
        let previous_node_state = nodes[0].node.encode();
        let mut previous_chain_monitor_state = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write_for_disk(&mut previous_chain_monitor_state).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.serialize_for_disk(&mut previous_chain_monitor_state).unwrap();
 
        send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
        send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000, 8_000_000);
@@ -7489,7 +7452,8 @@ fn test_data_loss_protect() {
        tx_broadcaster = test_utils::TestBroadcaster{txn_broadcasted: Mutex::new(Vec::new())};
        fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 };
        keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&nodes[0].node_seed, Network::Testnet);
-       monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &tx_broadcaster, &logger, &fee_estimator);
+       persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
+       monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &tx_broadcaster, &logger, &fee_estimator, &persister);
        node_state_0 = {
                let mut channel_monitors = HashMap::new();
                channel_monitors.insert(OutPoint { txid: chan.3.txid(), index: 0 }, &mut chain_monitor);
@@ -8350,15 +8314,16 @@ fn test_update_err_monitor_lockdown() {
        // Copy ChainMonitor to simulate a watchtower and update block height of node 0 until its ChannelMonitor timeout HTLC onchain
        let chain_source = test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet);
        let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::with_id(format!("node {}", 0));
+       let persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
        let watchtower = {
                let monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap();
                let monitor = monitors.get(&outpoint).unwrap();
                let mut w = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-               monitor.write_for_disk(&mut w).unwrap();
+               monitor.serialize_for_disk(&mut w).unwrap();
                let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<EnforcingChannelKeys>)>::read(
                                &mut ::std::io::Cursor::new(&w.0)).unwrap().1;
                assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
-               let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator);
+               let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &persister);
                assert!(watchtower.watch_channel(outpoint, new_monitor).is_ok());
                watchtower
        };
@@ -8408,15 +8373,16 @@ fn test_concurrent_monitor_claim() {
        // Copy ChainMonitor to simulate watchtower Alice and update block height her ChannelMonitor timeout HTLC onchain
        let chain_source = test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet);
        let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::with_id(format!("node {}", "Alice"));
+       let persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
        let watchtower_alice = {
                let monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap();
                let monitor = monitors.get(&outpoint).unwrap();
                let mut w = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-               monitor.write_for_disk(&mut w).unwrap();
+               monitor.serialize_for_disk(&mut w).unwrap();
                let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<EnforcingChannelKeys>)>::read(
                                &mut ::std::io::Cursor::new(&w.0)).unwrap().1;
                assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
-               let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator);
+               let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &persister);
                assert!(watchtower.watch_channel(outpoint, new_monitor).is_ok());
                watchtower
        };
@@ -8433,15 +8399,16 @@ fn test_concurrent_monitor_claim() {
        // Copy ChainMonitor to simulate watchtower Bob and make it receive a commitment update first.
        let chain_source = test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet);
        let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::with_id(format!("node {}", "Bob"));
+       let persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
        let watchtower_bob = {
                let monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap();
                let monitor = monitors.get(&outpoint).unwrap();
                let mut w = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
-               monitor.write_for_disk(&mut w).unwrap();
+               monitor.serialize_for_disk(&mut w).unwrap();
                let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<EnforcingChannelKeys>)>::read(
                                &mut ::std::io::Cursor::new(&w.0)).unwrap().1;
                assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
-               let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator);
+               let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &persister);
                assert!(watchtower.watch_channel(outpoint, new_monitor).is_ok());
                watchtower
        };
@@ -8494,3 +8461,411 @@ fn test_concurrent_monitor_claim() {
                check_spends!(htlc_txn[1], bob_state_y);
        }
 }
+
+#[test]
+fn test_pre_lockin_no_chan_closed_update() {
+       // Test that if a peer closes a channel in response to a funding_created message we don't
+       // generate a channel update (as the channel cannot appear on chain without a funding_signed
+       // message).
+       //
+       // Doing so would imply a channel monitor update before the initial channel monitor
+       // registration, violating our API guarantees.
+       //
+       // Previously, full_stack_target managed to hit this case by opening then closing a channel,
+       // then opening a second channel with the same funding output as the first (which is not
+       // rejected because the first channel does not exist in the ChannelManager) and closing it
+       // before receiving funding_signed.
+       let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+       let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+       let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+       let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+       // Create an initial channel
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+       let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_msg);
+       let accept_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &accept_chan_msg);
+
+       // Move the first channel through the funding flow...
+       let (temporary_channel_id, _tx, funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], 100000, 42);
+
+       nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, funding_output);
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
+
+       let funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       let channel_id = ::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index }.to_channel_id();
+       nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id, data: "Hi".to_owned() });
+       assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_htlc_no_detection() {
+       // This test is a mutation to underscore the detection logic bug we had
+        // before #653. HTLC value routed is above the remaining balance, thus
+        // inverting HTLC and `to_remote` output. HTLC will come second and
+        // it wouldn't be seen by pre-#653 detection as we were enumerate()'ing
+        // on a watched outputs vector (Vec<TxOut>) thus implicitly relying on
+        // outputs order detection for correct spending children filtring.
+
+        let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+        let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+        // Create some initial channels
+        let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+
+        send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 1_000_000, 1_000_000);
+        let (_, our_payment_hash) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 2_000_000);
+        let local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
+        assert_eq!(local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
+        assert_eq!(local_txn[0].output.len(), 3);
+        check_spends!(local_txn[0], chan_1.3);
+
+        // Timeout HTLC on A's chain and so it can generate a HTLC-Timeout tx
+        let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: Default::default(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
+        connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header, txdata: vec![local_txn[0].clone()] }, 200);
+       // We deliberately connect the local tx twice as this should provoke a failure calling
+       // this test before #653 fix.
+        connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header, txdata: vec![local_txn[0].clone()] }, 200);
+        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], false);
+        check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+        let htlc_timeout = {
+                let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+                assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
+                assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
+                check_spends!(node_txn[0], local_txn[0]);
+                node_txn[0].clone()
+        };
+
+        let header_201 = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: header.block_hash(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
+        connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header: header_201, txdata: vec![htlc_timeout.clone()] }, 201);
+        connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1, 201, true, header_201.block_hash());
+        expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true);
+}
+
+fn do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(broadcast_alice: bool, go_onchain_before_fulfill: bool) {
+       // If we route an HTLC, then learn the HTLC's preimage after the upstream channel has been
+       // force-closed, we must claim that HTLC on-chain. (Given an HTLC forwarded from Alice --> Bob -->
+       // Carol, Alice would be the upstream node, and Carol the downstream.)
+       //
+       // Steps of the test:
+       // 1) Alice sends a HTLC to Carol through Bob.
+       // 2) Carol doesn't settle the HTLC.
+       // 3) If broadcast_alice is true, Alice force-closes her channel with Bob. Else Bob force closes.
+       // Steps 4 and 5 may be reordered depending on go_onchain_before_fulfill.
+       // 4) Bob sees the Alice's commitment on his chain or vice versa. An offered output is present
+       //    but can't be claimed as Bob doesn't have yet knowledge of the preimage.
+       // 5) Carol release the preimage to Bob off-chain.
+       // 6) Bob claims the offered output on the broadcasted commitment.
+       let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
+       let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
+       let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
+       let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+       // Create some initial channels
+       let chan_ab = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+       create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 100000, 10001, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+
+       // Steps (1) and (2):
+       // Send an HTLC Alice --> Bob --> Carol, but Carol doesn't settle the HTLC back.
+       let (payment_preimage, _payment_hash) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), 3_000_000);
+
+       // Check that Alice's commitment transaction now contains an output for this HTLC.
+       let alice_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_ab.2);
+       check_spends!(alice_txn[0], chan_ab.3);
+       assert_eq!(alice_txn[0].output.len(), 2);
+       check_spends!(alice_txn[1], alice_txn[0]); // 2nd transaction is a non-final HTLC-timeout
+       assert_eq!(alice_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
+       assert_eq!(alice_txn.len(), 2);
+
+       // Steps (3) and (4):
+       // If `go_onchain_before_fufill`, broadcast the relevant commitment transaction and check that Bob
+       // responds by (1) broadcasting a channel update and (2) adding a new ChannelMonitor.
+       let mut force_closing_node = 0; // Alice force-closes
+       if !broadcast_alice { force_closing_node = 1; } // Bob force-closes
+       nodes[force_closing_node].node.force_close_channel(&chan_ab.2);
+       check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[force_closing_node], false);
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[force_closing_node], 1);
+       if go_onchain_before_fulfill {
+               let txn_to_broadcast = match broadcast_alice {
+                       true => alice_txn.clone(),
+                       false => get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_ab.2)
+               };
+               let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: Default::default(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42};
+               connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![txn_to_broadcast[0].clone()]}, 1);
+               let mut bob_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+               if broadcast_alice {
+                       check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], false);
+                       check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+               }
+               assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 1);
+               check_spends!(bob_txn[0], chan_ab.3);
+       }
+
+       // Step (5):
+       // Carol then claims the funds and sends an update_fulfill message to Bob, and they go through the
+       // process of removing the HTLC from their commitment transactions.
+       assert!(nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage, &None, 3_000_000));
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+       let carol_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       assert!(carol_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
+       assert!(carol_updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
+       assert!(carol_updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
+       assert!(carol_updates.update_fee.is_none());
+       assert_eq!(carol_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
+
+       nodes[1].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
+       // If Alice broadcasted but Bob doesn't know yet, here he prepares to tell her about the preimage.
+       if !go_onchain_before_fulfill && broadcast_alice {
+               let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+               assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+               match events[0] {
+                       MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, .. } => {
+                               assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+                       },
+                       _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+               };
+       }
+       nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_updates.commitment_signed);
+       // One monitor update for the preimage to update the Bob<->Alice channel, one monitor update
+       // Carol<->Bob's updated commitment transaction info.
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
+
+       let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+       assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
+       let bob_revocation = match events[0] {
+               MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
+                       assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+                       (*msg).clone()
+               },
+               _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+       };
+       let bob_updates = match events[1] {
+               MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, ref updates } => {
+                       assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+                       (*updates).clone()
+               },
+               _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+       };
+
+       nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_revocation);
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+       nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_updates.commitment_signed);
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+
+       let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+       assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+       let carol_revocation = match events[0] {
+               MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
+                       assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+                       (*msg).clone()
+               },
+               _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+       };
+       nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_revocation);
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+       // If this test requires the force-closed channel to not be on-chain until after the fulfill,
+       // here's where we put said channel's commitment tx on-chain.
+       let mut txn_to_broadcast = alice_txn.clone();
+       if !broadcast_alice { txn_to_broadcast = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_ab.2); }
+       if !go_onchain_before_fulfill {
+               let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: Default::default(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42};
+               connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![txn_to_broadcast[0].clone()]}, 1);
+               // If Bob was the one to force-close, he will have already passed these checks earlier.
+               if broadcast_alice {
+                       check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], false);
+                       check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+               }
+               let mut bob_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+               if broadcast_alice {
+                       // In `connect_block()`, the ChainMonitor and ChannelManager are separately notified about a
+                       // new block being connected. The ChannelManager being notified triggers a monitor update,
+                       // which triggers broadcasting our commitment tx and an HTLC-claiming tx. The ChainMonitor
+                       // being notified triggers the HTLC-claiming tx redundantly, resulting in 3 total txs being
+                       // broadcasted.
+                       assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 3);
+                       check_spends!(bob_txn[1], chan_ab.3);
+               } else {
+                       assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 2);
+                       check_spends!(bob_txn[0], chan_ab.3);
+               }
+       }
+
+       // Step (6):
+       // Finally, check that Bob broadcasted a preimage-claiming transaction for the HTLC output on the
+       // broadcasted commitment transaction.
+       {
+               let bob_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
+               if go_onchain_before_fulfill {
+                       // Bob should now have an extra broadcasted tx, for the preimage-claiming transaction.
+                       assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 2);
+               }
+               let script_weight = match broadcast_alice {
+                       true => OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT,
+                       false => ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT
+               };
+               // If Alice force-closed and Bob didn't receive her commitment transaction until after he
+               // received Carol's fulfill, he broadcasts the HTLC-output-claiming transaction first. Else if
+               // Bob force closed or if he found out about Alice's commitment tx before receiving Carol's
+               // fulfill, then he broadcasts the HTLC-output-claiming transaction second.
+               if broadcast_alice && !go_onchain_before_fulfill {
+                       check_spends!(bob_txn[0], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
+                       assert_eq!(bob_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), script_weight);
+               } else {
+                       check_spends!(bob_txn[1], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
+                       assert_eq!(bob_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), script_weight);
+               }
+       }
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close() {
+       do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(true, true);
+       do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(false, true); // Technically redundant, but may as well
+       do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(true, false);
+       do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(false, false);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_duplicate_chan_id() {
+       // Test that if a given peer tries to open a channel with the same channel_id as one that is
+       // already open we reject it and keep the old channel.
+       //
+       // Previously, full_stack_target managed to figure out that if you tried to open two channels
+       // with the same funding output (ie post-funding channel_id), we'd create a monitor update for
+       // the existing channel when we detect the duplicate new channel, screwing up our monitor
+       // updating logic for the existing channel.
+       let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+       let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+       let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+       let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+       // Create an initial channel
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+       let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_msg);
+       nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
+
+       // Try to create a second channel with the same temporary_channel_id as the first and check
+       // that it is rejected.
+       nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_msg);
+       {
+               let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+               assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+               match events[0] {
+                       MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
+                               // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both the
+                               // first (valid) and second (invalid) channels are closed, given they both have
+                               // the same non-temporary channel_id. However, currently we do not, so we just
+                               // move forward with it.
+                               assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id);
+                               assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+                       },
+                       _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+               }
+       }
+
+       // Move the first channel through the funding flow...
+       let (temporary_channel_id, tx, funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], 100000, 42);
+
+       nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, funding_output);
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
+
+       let mut funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msg);
+       {
+               let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
+               assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
+               assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
+               added_monitors.clear();
+       }
+       let funding_signed_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+       let funding_outpoint = ::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index };
+       let channel_id = funding_outpoint.to_channel_id();
+
+       // Now we have the first channel past funding_created (ie it has a txid-based channel_id, not a
+       // temporary one).
+
+       // First try to open a second channel with a temporary channel id equal to the txid-based one.
+       // Technically this is allowed by the spec, but we don't support it and there's little reason
+       // to. Still, it shouldn't cause any other issues.
+       open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id = channel_id;
+       nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_msg);
+       {
+               let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+               assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+               match events[0] {
+                       MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
+                               // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both
+                               // channels are closed, but currently we do not, so we just move forward with it.
+                               assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id);
+                               assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+                       },
+                       _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+               }
+       }
+
+       // Now try to create a second channel which has a duplicate funding output.
+       nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
+       let open_chan_2_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+       nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_chan_2_msg);
+       nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
+       create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], 100000, 42); // Get and check the FundingGenerationReady event
+
+       let funding_created = {
+               let mut a_channel_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
+               let mut as_chan = a_channel_lock.by_id.get_mut(&open_chan_2_msg.temporary_channel_id).unwrap();
+               let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+               as_chan.get_outbound_funding_created(funding_outpoint, &&logger).unwrap()
+       };
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
+       nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created);
+       // At this point we'll try to add a duplicate channel monitor, which will be rejected, but
+       // still needs to be cleared here.
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+       // ...still, nodes[1] will reject the duplicate channel.
+       {
+               let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+               assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+               match events[0] {
+                       MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
+                               // Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both
+                               // channels are closed, but currently we do not, so we just move forward with it.
+                               assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, channel_id);
+                               assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+                       },
+                       _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+               }
+       }
+
+       // finally, finish creating the original channel and send a payment over it to make sure
+       // everything is functional.
+       nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed_msg);
+       {
+               let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
+               assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
+               assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
+               added_monitors.clear();
+       }
+
+       let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+       assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
+       match events_4[0] {
+               Event::FundingBroadcastSafe { ref funding_txo, user_channel_id } => {
+                       assert_eq!(user_channel_id, 42);
+                       assert_eq!(*funding_txo, funding_output);
+               },
+               _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+       };
+
+       let (funding_locked, _) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx);
+       let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_locked);
+       update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update);
+       send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8000000, 8_000_000);
+}