use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
use chain::keysinterface::BaseSign;
use ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash};
-use ln::channel::{COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC};
+use ln::channel::{COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC, CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT};
use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, PaymentId, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
use ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError};
use ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils};
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
- let channel_value = 1977;
- let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value, 700000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let channel_value = 5000;
+ let push_sats = 700;
+ let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value, push_sats * 1000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
let channel_id = chan.2;
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
-
- let feerate = 260;
+ let bs_channel_reserve_sats = Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(channel_value);
+
+ // Calculate the maximum feerate that A can afford. Note that we don't send an update_fee
+ // CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER HTLCs before actually running out of local balance, so we
+ // calculate two different feerates here - the expected local limit as well as the expected
+ // remote limit.
+ let feerate = ((channel_value - bs_channel_reserve_sats - push_sats) * 1000 / (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT + CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER as u64 * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC)) as u32;
+ let non_buffer_feerate = ((channel_value - bs_channel_reserve_sats - push_sats) * 1000 / COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT) as u32;
{
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
*feerate_lock = feerate;
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], update_msg.commitment_signed, false);
- //Confirm that the new fee based on the last local commitment txn is what we expected based on the feerate of 260 set above.
- //This value results in a fee that is exactly what the funder can afford (277 sat + 1000 sat channel reserve)
+ // Confirm that the new fee based on the last local commitment txn is what we expected based on the feerate set above.
{
let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], channel_id)[0].clone();
- //We made sure neither party's funds are below the dust limit so -2 non-HTLC txns from number of outputs
- let num_htlcs = commitment_tx.output.len() - 2;
- let total_fee: u64 = feerate as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT + (num_htlcs as u64) * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000;
+ //We made sure neither party's funds are below the dust limit and there are no HTLCs here
+ assert_eq!(commitment_tx.output.len(), 2);
+ let total_fee: u64 = commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 0) / 1000;
let mut actual_fee = commitment_tx.output.iter().fold(0, |acc, output| acc + output.value);
actual_fee = channel_value - actual_fee;
assert_eq!(total_fee, actual_fee);
}
- //Add 2 to the previous fee rate to the final fee increases by 1 (with no HTLCs the fee is essentially
- //fee_rate*(724/1000) so the increment of 1*0.724 is rounded back down)
{
+ // Increment the feerate by a small constant, accounting for rounding errors
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
- *feerate_lock = feerate + 2;
+ *feerate_lock += 4;
}
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot afford to send new feerate at {}", feerate + 2), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot afford to send new feerate at {}", feerate + 4), 1);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 281474976710654;
let mut htlcs: Vec<(HTLCOutputInCommitment, ())> = vec![];
let commitment_tx = CommitmentTransaction::new_with_auxiliary_htlc_data(
INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1,
- 700,
- 999,
+ push_sats,
+ channel_value - push_sats - commit_tx_fee_msat(non_buffer_feerate + 4, 0) / 1000,
false, local_funding, remote_funding,
commit_tx_keys.clone(),
- feerate + 124,
+ non_buffer_feerate + 4,
&mut htlcs,
&local_chan.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable()
);
let update_fee = msgs::UpdateFee {
channel_id: chan.2,
- feerate_per_kw: feerate + 124,
+ feerate_per_kw: non_buffer_feerate + 4,
};
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fee);
// sending any above-dust amount would result in a channel reserve violation.
// In this test we check that we would be prevented from sending an HTLC in
// this situation.
- let feerate_per_kw = 253;
- chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
- chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
+ let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
- push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT + COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000 * 1000;
+ push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64);
push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000;
let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Sending exactly enough to hit the reserve amount should be accepted
- let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
+ for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT {
+ let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
+ }
// However one more HTLC should be significantly over the reserve amount and fail.
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1_000_000);
#[test]
fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_outbound_channel() {
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
- // Set the fee rate for the channel very high, to the point where the funder
- // receiving 1 update_add_htlc would result in them closing the channel due
- // to channel reserve violation. This close could also happen if the fee went
- // up a more realistic amount, but many HTLCs were outstanding at the time of
- // the update_add_htlc.
- chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(6000) };
- chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(6000) };
+ let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
- let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1000);
+ // Set nodes[0]'s balance such that they will consider any above-dust received HTLC to be a
+ // channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment
+ // transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)).
+ let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
+ push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64);
+ push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000;
+ let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+
+ // Send four HTLCs to cover the initial push_msat buffer we're required to include
+ for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT {
+ let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
+ }
+
+ let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 700_000);
// Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
- let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 1000, &Some(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
+ let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 700_000, &Some(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash);
let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
channel_id: chan.2,
- htlc_id: 1,
- amount_msat: htlc_msat + 1,
+ htlc_id: MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64,
+ amount_msat: htlc_msat,
payment_hash: payment_hash,
cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
// Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an outbound channel, they don't count when
// calculating our commitment transaction fee (this was previously broken).
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
- let feerate_per_kw = 253;
- chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
- chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
+ let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
// channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment
// transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)).
let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
- push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT) / 1000 * 1000;
+ push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64);
push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000;
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, push_amt, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// commitment transaction fee.
let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_amt);
+ // Send four HTLCs to cover the initial push_msat buffer we're required to include
+ for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT {
+ let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
+ }
+
// One more than the dust amt should fail, however.
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], dust_amt + 1);
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value"));
}
+#[test]
+fn test_chan_init_feerate_unaffordability() {
+ // Test that we will reject channel opens which do not leave enough to pay for any HTLCs due to
+ // channel reserve and feerate requirements.
+ let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ // Set the push_msat amount such that nodes[0] will not be able to afford to add even a single
+ // HTLC.
+ let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
+ push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64);
+ assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, push_amt + 1, 42, None).unwrap_err(),
+ APIError::APIMisuseError { err: "Funding amount (356) can't even pay fee for initial commitment transaction fee of 357.".to_string() });
+
+ // During open, we don't have a "counterparty channel reserve" to check against, so that
+ // requirement only comes into play on the open_channel handling side.
+ push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000;
+ nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, push_amt, 42, None).unwrap();
+ let mut open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ open_channel_msg.push_msat += 1;
+ nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel_msg);
+
+ let msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
+ match msg_events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => {
+ assert_eq!(msg.data, "Insufficient funding amount for initial reserve");
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+}
+
#[test]
fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_inbound_chan() {
// Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an inbound channel, they don't count when
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_removes.commitment_signed);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
- expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
+ expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_1.msgs[0]);
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_1.commitment_msg);
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_cs.commitment_signed);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
- expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_2);
+ expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_2);
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
// resolve the second HTLC from A's point of view.
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
// Now that B doesn't have the second RAA anymore, but A still does, send a payment from B back
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed);
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 5);
let mut first_claimed = false;
for event in events {
match event {
assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_2);
}
},
+ Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {},
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let claim_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &claim_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
- expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
+ expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
- assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
+ expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
}
#[test]
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 0), (false, false));
{
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
match events[0] {
Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash, .. } => {
assert_eq!(payment_preimage, payment_preimage_3);
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
+ match events[2] {
+ Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {},
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
}
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_preimage_4);
if messages_delivered < 2 {
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
if messages_delivered < 1 {
- let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
- match events_4[0] {
- Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, .. } => {
- assert_eq!(payment_preimage_1, *payment_preimage);
- assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash);
- },
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
- }
+ expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
} else {
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
}
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
}
+ if messages_delivered == 1 || messages_delivered == 2 {
+ expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
+ }
+
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ if messages_delivered > 2 {
+ expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
+ }
+
// Channel should still work fine...
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
let payment_preimage_2 = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 1000000).0;
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2);
}
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
- let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 99000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 98_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
nodes[1].node.force_close_channel(&chan.2).unwrap();
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
- let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 99000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 98_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
nodes[0].node.force_close_channel(&chan.2).unwrap();
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 });
+ let (payment_preimage, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 });
// Claim the payment, but don't deliver A's commitment_signed, resulting in the HTLC only being
// present in B's local commitment transaction, but none of A's commitment transactions.
- assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage));
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
let bs_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
- let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
- match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash, .. } => {
- assert_eq!(payment_preimage, our_payment_preimage);
- assert_eq!(payment_hash, our_payment_hash);
- },
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
- }
+ expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.commitment_signed);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let update_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], update_msgs.commitment_signed, false, true);
- let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
- match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, .. } => {
- assert_eq!(*payment_preimage, payment_preimage_1);
- assert_eq!(*payment_hash, payment_hash_1);
- }
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
- }
+ expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
}
// Test that if we fail to forward an HTLC that is being freed from the holding cell that the
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff