use crate::chain::channelmonitor;
use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID, CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, ANTI_REORG_DELAY};
use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
-use crate::sign::{EcdsaChannelSigner, EntropySource, SignerProvider};
+use crate::sign::{ecdsa::EcdsaChannelSigner, EntropySource, SignerProvider};
use crate::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PathFailure, PaymentPurpose, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination, PaymentFailureReason};
use crate::ln::{ChannelId, PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash};
use crate::ln::channel::{commitment_tx_base_weight, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC, CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER, FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT, get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis, OutboundV1Channel, InboundV1Channel, COINBASE_MATURITY, ChannelPhase};
*feerate_lock += 4;
}
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot afford to send new feerate at {}", feerate + 4), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel", format!("Cannot afford to send new feerate at {}", feerate + 4), 1);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 281474976710654;
&mut htlcs,
&local_chan.context.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable()
);
- local_chan_signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, Vec::new(), &secp_ctx).unwrap()
+ local_chan_signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, Vec::new(), Vec::new(), &secp_ctx).unwrap()
};
let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned {
//check to see if the funder, who sent the update_fee request, can afford the new fee (funder_balance >= fee+channel_reserve)
//Should produce and error.
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commit_signed_msg);
- nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee".to_string(), 1);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: String::from("Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee") },
cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
skimmed_fee_msat: None,
+ blinding_point: None,
};
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
&mut vec![(accepted_htlc_info, ())],
&local_chan.context.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable()
);
- local_chan_signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, Vec::new(), &secp_ctx).unwrap()
+ local_chan_signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, Vec::new(), Vec::new(), &secp_ctx).unwrap()
};
let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned {
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
};
- nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(),
+ nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel",
format!("Attempting to fail HTLC due to fee spike buffer violation in channel {}. Rebalancing is required.", raa_msg.channel_id), 1);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
skimmed_fee_msat: None,
+ blinding_point: None,
};
nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
// Check that the payment failed and the channel is closed in response to the malicious UpdateAdd.
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value".to_string(), 1);
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value");
cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
skimmed_fee_msat: None,
+ blinding_point: None,
};
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
// Check that the payment failed and the channel is closed in response to the malicious UpdateAdd.
- nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value".to_string(), 1);
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value");
// that a revoked commitment transaction is broadcasted
// (Similar to `revoked_output_claim` test but we get the justice tx + broadcast manually)
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
- let destination_script0 = chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.get_destination_script().unwrap();
- let destination_script1 = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_destination_script().unwrap();
+ let destination_script0 = chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.get_destination_script([0; 32]).unwrap();
+ let destination_script1 = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_destination_script([0; 32]).unwrap();
let persisters = vec![WatchtowerPersister::new(destination_script0),
WatchtowerPersister::new(destination_script1)];
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs_with_persisters(2, &chanmon_cfgs, persisters.iter().collect());
cltv_expiry,
onion_routing_packet,
skimmed_fee_msat: None,
+ blinding_point: None,
};
nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_add_htlc);
}
// us to surface its failure to the user.
chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0);
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 1 HTLC updates in channel {}", chan.2), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel", format!("Freeing holding cell with 1 HTLC updates in channel {}", chan.2), 1);
// Check that the payment failed to be sent out.
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
// to surface its failure to the user. The first payment should succeed.
chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0);
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 2 HTLC updates in channel {}", chan.2), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel", format!("Freeing holding cell with 2 HTLC updates in channel {}", chan.2), 1);
// Check that the second payment failed to be sent out.
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
}
+#[test]
+fn test_payment_route_reaching_same_channel_twice() {
+ //A route should not go through the same channel twice
+ //It is enforced when constructing a route.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+ let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 0);
+
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 0)
+ .with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
+ let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], payment_params, 100000000);
+
+ // Extend the path by itself, essentially simulating route going through same channel twice
+ let cloned_hops = route.paths[0].hops.clone();
+ route.paths[0].hops.extend_from_slice(&cloned_hops);
+
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
+ RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
+ ), false, APIError::InvalidRoute { ref err },
+ assert_eq!(err, &"Path went through the same channel twice"));
+}
+
// BOLT 2 Requirements for the Sender when constructing and sending an update_add_htlc message.
// BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST NOT offer amount_msat it cannot pay for in the remote commitment transaction at the current feerate_per_kw (see "Updating Fees") while maintaining its channel reserve.
//TODO: I don't believe this is explicitly enforced when sending an HTLC but as the Fee aspect of the BOLT specs is in flux leaving this as a TODO.
updates.update_add_htlcs[0].amount_msat = 0;
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
- nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC".to_string(), 1);
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC".to_string() },
cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
onion_routing_packet: onion_packet.clone(),
skimmed_fee_msat: None,
+ blinding_point: None,
};
for i in 0..50 {
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42); // Get and check the FundingGenerationReady event
- let (_, funding_created) = {
+ let funding_created = {
let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
let mut a_peer_state = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
// Once we call `get_funding_created` the channel has a duplicate channel_id as
// try to create another channel. Instead, we drop the channel entirely here (leaving the
// channelmanager in a possibly nonsense state instead).
match a_peer_state.channel_by_id.remove(&open_chan_2_msg.temporary_channel_id).unwrap() {
- ChannelPhase::UnfundedOutboundV1(chan) => {
+ ChannelPhase::UnfundedOutboundV1(mut chan) => {
let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
chan.get_funding_created(tx.clone(), funding_outpoint, false, &&logger).map_err(|_| ()).unwrap()
},
// Outbound dust balance: 6399 sats
let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1);
let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel", format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
} else {
// Outbound dust balance: 5200 sats
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(),
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel",
format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx",
dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat * (dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx - 1) + dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat + 4,
max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff