use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
use chain::keysinterface::BaseSign;
use ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash};
-use ln::channel::{COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC, CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT};
-use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, PaymentId, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
+use ln::channel::{COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC, CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER, FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT};
+use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, PaymentId, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA, PAYMENT_EXPIRY_BLOCKS };
use ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError};
use ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils};
use ln::chan_utils::{HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT, HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT, HTLCOutputInCommitment};
-use routing::network_graph::{NetworkUpdate, RoutingFees};
+use routing::network_graph::RoutingFees;
use routing::router::{Payee, Route, RouteHop, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteParameters, find_route, get_route};
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs;
use bitcoin::blockdata::constants::genesis_block;
use bitcoin::network::constants::Network;
-use bitcoin::hashes::sha256::Hash as Sha256;
-use bitcoin::hashes::Hash;
-
use bitcoin::secp256k1::Secp256k1;
use bitcoin::secp256k1::key::{PublicKey,SecretKey};
insane_open_helper("Peer never wants payout outputs?", |mut msg| { msg.dust_limit_satoshis = msg.funding_satoshis + 1 ; msg });
- insane_open_helper(r"Bogus; channel reserve \(\d+\) is less than dust limit \(\d+\)", |mut msg| { msg.dust_limit_satoshis = msg.channel_reserve_satoshis + 1; msg });
-
insane_open_helper(r"Minimum htlc value \(\d+\) was larger than full channel value \(\d+\)", |mut msg| { msg.htlc_minimum_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000; msg });
insane_open_helper("They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period", |mut msg| { msg.to_self_delay = MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT + 1; msg });
insane_open_helper("max_accepted_htlcs was 484. It must not be larger than 483", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 484; msg });
}
+fn do_test_counterparty_no_reserve(send_from_initiator: bool) {
+ // A peer providing a channel_reserve_satoshis of 0 (or less than our dust limit) is insecure,
+ // but only for them. Because some LSPs do it with some level of trust of the clients (for a
+ // substantial UX improvement), we explicitly allow it. Because it's unlikely to happen often
+ // in normal testing, we test it explicitly here.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ // Have node0 initiate a channel to node1 with aforementioned parameters
+ let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
+ let feerate_per_kw = 253;
+ push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT + 4 * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000 * 1000;
+ push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000;
+
+ let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, if send_from_initiator { 0 } else { push_amt }, 42, None).unwrap();
+ let mut open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ if !send_from_initiator {
+ open_channel_message.channel_reserve_satoshis = 0;
+ open_channel_message.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 100_000_000;
+ }
+ nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel_message);
+
+ // Extract the channel accept message from node1 to node0
+ let mut accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ if send_from_initiator {
+ accept_channel_message.channel_reserve_satoshis = 0;
+ accept_channel_message.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 100_000_000;
+ }
+ nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &accept_channel_message);
+ {
+ let mut lock;
+ let mut chan = get_channel_ref!(if send_from_initiator { &nodes[1] } else { &nodes[0] }, lock, temp_channel_id);
+ chan.holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis = 0;
+ chan.holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 100_000_000;
+ }
+
+ let funding_tx = sign_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 100_000, temp_channel_id);
+ let funding_msgs = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_tx);
+ create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_msgs.0);
+
+ // nodes[0] should now be able to send the full balance to nodes[1], violating nodes[1]'s
+ // security model if it ever tries to send funds back to nodes[0] (but that's not our problem).
+ if send_from_initiator {
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100_000_000
+ // Note that for outbound channels we have to consider the commitment tx fee and the
+ // "fee spike buffer", which is currently a multiple of the total commitment tx fee as
+ // well as an additional HTLC.
+ - FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE * commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, 2));
+ } else {
+ send_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], push_amt);
+ }
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_counterparty_no_reserve() {
+ do_test_counterparty_no_reserve(true);
+ do_test_counterparty_no_reserve(false);
+}
+
#[test]
fn test_async_inbound_update_fee() {
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
let tx = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_init(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 100000, 10001, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &tx);
nodes[0].node.handle_funding_locked(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingLocked, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &tx);
- let (funding_locked, _) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm_second(&nodes[1], &nodes[0]);
- let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_locked);
+ let as_msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(as_msg_events.len(), 2);
+ let as_funding_locked = if let MessageSendEvent::SendFundingLocked { ref node_id, ref msg } = as_msg_events[0] {
+ assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ msg.clone()
+ } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); };
+ if let MessageSendEvent::SendChannelUpdate { ref node_id, msg: _ } = as_msg_events[1] {
+ assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_funding_locked(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_funding_locked);
+ let bs_msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(bs_msg_events.len(), 1);
+ if let MessageSendEvent::SendChannelUpdate { ref node_id, msg: _ } = bs_msg_events[0] {
+ assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
+
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100_000);
+
+ // After 6 confirmations, as required by the spec, we'll send announcement_signatures and
+ // broadcast the channel_announcement (but not before exactly 6 confirmations).
+ connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 4);
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
+ connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_announcement_signatures(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendAnnouncementSignatures, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
+
+ connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 5);
+ let bs_announce_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(bs_announce_events.len(), 2);
+ let bs_announcement_sigs = if let MessageSendEvent::SendAnnouncementSignatures { ref node_id, ref msg } = bs_announce_events[0] {
+ assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ msg.clone()
+ } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); };
+ let (bs_announcement, bs_update) = if let MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelAnnouncement { ref msg, ref update_msg } = bs_announce_events[1] {
+ (msg.clone(), update_msg.clone())
+ } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); };
+
+ nodes[0].node.handle_announcement_signatures(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_announcement_sigs);
+ let as_announce_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(as_announce_events.len(), 1);
+ let (announcement, as_update) = if let MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelAnnouncement { ref msg, ref update_msg } = as_announce_events[0] {
+ (msg.clone(), update_msg.clone())
+ } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); };
+ assert_eq!(announcement, bs_announcement);
for node in nodes {
assert!(node.net_graph_msg_handler.handle_channel_announcement(&announcement).unwrap());
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
+ assert!(ANTI_REORG_DELAY > PAYMENT_EXPIRY_BLOCKS); // We assume payments will also expire
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events.len(), if deliver_bs_raa { 2 } else { 3 });
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), if deliver_bs_raa { 2 } else { 4 });
match events[0] {
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => { },
_ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
}
if !deliver_bs_raa {
match events[2] {
+ Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
+ assert_eq!(*payment_hash, fourth_payment_hash);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ match events[3] {
Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
};
confirm_transaction(&nodes[0], &tx);
let events_1 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
- let chan_id;
- assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 1);
- match events_1[0] {
- MessageSendEvent::SendFundingLocked { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
- assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
- chan_id = msg.channel_id;
- },
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
- }
+ assert!(events_1.is_empty());
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
confirm_transaction(&nodes[1], &tx);
let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
- assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 2);
- let funding_locked = match events_2[0] {
+ assert!(events_2.is_empty());
+
+ nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty() });
+ let as_reestablish = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty() });
+ let bs_reestablish = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ // nodes[0] hasn't yet received a funding_locked, so it only sends that on reconnect.
+ nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_reestablish);
+ let events_3 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
+ let as_funding_locked = match events_3[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendFundingLocked { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
+ assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ msg.clone()
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events_3[0]),
+ };
+
+ // nodes[1] received nodes[0]'s funding_locked on the first reconnect above, so it should send
+ // announcement_signatures as well as channel_update.
+ nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_reestablish);
+ let events_4 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 3);
+ let chan_id;
+ let bs_funding_locked = match events_4[0] {
MessageSendEvent::SendFundingLocked { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ chan_id = msg.channel_id;
msg.clone()
},
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events_4[0]),
};
- let bs_announcement_sigs = match events_2[1] {
+ let bs_announcement_sigs = match events_4[1] {
MessageSendEvent::SendAnnouncementSignatures { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
msg.clone()
},
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events_4[1]),
};
+ match events_4[2] {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendChannelUpdate { ref node_id, msg: _ } => {
+ assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events_4[2]),
+ }
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ // Re-deliver nodes[0]'s funding_locked, which nodes[1] can safely ignore. It currently
+ // generates a duplicative private channel_update
+ nodes[1].node.handle_funding_locked(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_funding_locked);
+ let events_5 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events_5.len(), 1);
+ match events_5[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::SendChannelUpdate { ref node_id, msg: _ } => {
+ assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events_5[0]),
+ };
- nodes[0].node.handle_funding_locked(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_locked);
- nodes[0].node.handle_announcement_signatures(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_announcement_sigs);
- let events_3 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
- assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 2);
- let as_announcement_sigs = match events_3[0] {
+ // When we deliver nodes[1]'s funding_locked, however, nodes[0] will generate its
+ // announcement_signatures.
+ nodes[0].node.handle_funding_locked(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_funding_locked);
+ let events_6 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events_6.len(), 1);
+ let as_announcement_sigs = match events_6[0] {
MessageSendEvent::SendAnnouncementSignatures { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
msg.clone()
},
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events_6[0]),
};
- let (as_announcement, as_update) = match events_3[1] {
+
+ // When we deliver nodes[1]'s announcement_signatures to nodes[0], nodes[0] should immediately
+ // broadcast the channel announcement globally, as well as re-send its (now-public)
+ // channel_update.
+ nodes[0].node.handle_announcement_signatures(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_announcement_sigs);
+ let events_7 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events_7.len(), 1);
+ let (chan_announcement, as_update) = match events_7[0] {
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelAnnouncement { ref msg, ref update_msg } => {
(msg.clone(), update_msg.clone())
},
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events_7[0]),
};
+ // Finally, deliver nodes[0]'s announcement_signatures to nodes[1] and make sure it creates the
+ // same channel_announcement.
nodes[1].node.handle_announcement_signatures(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_announcement_sigs);
- let events_4 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
- assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
- let (_, bs_update) = match events_4[0] {
+ let events_8 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events_8.len(), 1);
+ let bs_update = match events_8[0] {
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelAnnouncement { ref msg, ref update_msg } => {
- (msg.clone(), update_msg.clone())
+ assert_eq!(*msg, chan_announcement);
+ update_msg.clone()
},
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events_8[0]),
};
- nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.handle_channel_announcement(&as_announcement).unwrap();
+ // Provide the channel announcement and public updates to the network graph
+ nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.handle_channel_announcement(&chan_announcement).unwrap();
nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.handle_channel_update(&bs_update).unwrap();
nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.handle_channel_update(&as_update).unwrap();
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
- // as_announcement should be re-generated exactly by broadcast_node_announcement.
+ // The channel announcement should be re-generated exactly by broadcast_node_announcement.
nodes[0].node.broadcast_node_announcement([0, 0, 0], [0; 32], Vec::new());
let msgs = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
let mut found_announcement = false;
for event in msgs.iter() {
match event {
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelAnnouncement { ref msg, .. } => {
- if *msg == as_announcement { found_announcement = true; }
+ if *msg == chan_announcement { found_announcement = true; }
},
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastNodeAnnouncement { .. } => {},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], second_payment_hash, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
} else {
- expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], second_payment_hash, true);
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
+ if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } = events[0] {
+ assert_eq!(*payment_hash, second_payment_hash);
+ } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
+ if let Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } = events[1] {
+ assert_eq!(*payment_hash, second_payment_hash);
+ } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
}
}
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
} else {
- expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true);
+ let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
+ if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } = events[0] {
+ assert_eq!(*payment_hash, our_payment_hash);
+ } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
+ if let Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } = events[1] {
+ assert_eq!(*payment_hash, our_payment_hash);
+ } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
}
}
nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
- if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &low_our_to_self_config, 0) {
+ if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &low_our_to_self_config, 0, &nodes[0].logger) {
match error {
ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
- if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &high_their_to_self_config, 0) {
+ if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &high_their_to_self_config, 0, &nodes[0].logger) {
match error {
ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
- let short_id_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
- let short_id_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
- let short_id_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
// Disconnect peers
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred(); // DisabledStaged -> Disabled
let msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 3);
- let mut chans_disabled: HashSet<u64> = [short_id_1, short_id_2, short_id_3].iter().map(|a| *a).collect();
+ let mut chans_disabled = HashMap::new();
for e in msg_events {
match e {
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & (1<<1), 1<<1); // The "channel disabled" bit should be set
// Check that each channel gets updated exactly once
- if !chans_disabled.remove(&msg.contents.short_channel_id) {
+ if chans_disabled.insert(msg.contents.short_channel_id, msg.contents.timestamp).is_some() {
panic!("Generated ChannelUpdate for wrong chan!");
}
},
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
let msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 3);
- chans_disabled = [short_id_1, short_id_2, short_id_3].iter().map(|a| *a).collect();
for e in msg_events {
match e {
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & (1<<1), 0); // The "channel disabled" bit should be off
- // Check that each channel gets updated exactly once
- if !chans_disabled.remove(&msg.contents.short_channel_id) {
- panic!("Generated ChannelUpdate for wrong chan!");
+ match chans_disabled.remove(&msg.contents.short_channel_id) {
+ // Each update should have a higher timestamp than the previous one, replacing
+ // the old one.
+ Some(prev_timestamp) => assert!(msg.contents.timestamp > prev_timestamp),
+ None => panic!("Generated ChannelUpdate for wrong chan!"),
}
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
}
+ // Check that each channel gets updated exactly once
+ assert!(chans_disabled.is_empty());
}
#[test]
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
{
- let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 7200);
+ let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 7200).unwrap();
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000);
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
}
#[test]
+#[allow(deprecated)]
fn test_secret_timeout() {
- // Simple test of payment secret storage time outs
+ // Simple test of payment secret storage time outs. After
+ // `create_inbound_payment(_for_hash)_legacy` is removed, this test will be removed as well.
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id;
- let (payment_hash, payment_secret_1) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2);
+ let (payment_hash, payment_secret_1) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_legacy(Some(100_000), 2).unwrap();
// We should fail to register the same payment hash twice, at least until we've connected a
// block with time 7200 + CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1.
- if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2) {
+ if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash_legacy(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2) {
assert_eq!(err, "Duplicate payment hash");
} else { panic!(); }
let mut block = {
}
};
connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
- if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2) {
+ if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash_legacy(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2) {
assert_eq!(err, "Duplicate payment hash");
} else { panic!(); }
block.header.prev_blockhash = block.header.block_hash();
block.header.time += 1;
connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
- let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2).unwrap();
+ let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash_legacy(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2).unwrap();
assert_ne!(payment_secret_1, our_payment_secret);
{
let random_payment_hash = PaymentHash([42; 32]);
let random_payment_secret = PaymentSecret([43; 32]);
- let (our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2);
+ let (our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2).unwrap();
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000);
// All the below cases should end up being handled exactly identically, so we macro the
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff