Expect `pending_msg_events` to be in random peer order in tests
[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / ln / monitor_tests.rs
index a2fccbbc3883d6bb1e4d7f97ff89021b979483be..0ad392131acecf77e2174b0338721cd5db395325 100644 (file)
@@ -9,23 +9,22 @@
 
 //! Further functional tests which test blockchain reorganizations.
 
-use chain::channelmonitor::{ANTI_REORG_DELAY, Balance};
-use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
-use chain::chaininterface::LowerBoundedFeeEstimator;
-use ln::channel;
-use ln::channelmanager::BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT;
-use ln::features::InitFeatures;
-use ln::msgs::ChannelMessageHandler;
-use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination};
+use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{ANTI_REORG_DELAY, Balance};
+use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
+use crate::chain::chaininterface::LowerBoundedFeeEstimator;
+use crate::ln::channel;
+use crate::ln::channelmanager::{self, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, PaymentId};
+use crate::ln::msgs::ChannelMessageHandler;
+use crate::util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination};
 
 use bitcoin::blockdata::script::Builder;
 use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes;
 use bitcoin::secp256k1::Secp256k1;
 use bitcoin::Transaction;
 
-use prelude::*;
+use crate::prelude::*;
 
-use ln::functional_test_utils::*;
+use crate::ln::functional_test_utils::*;
 
 #[test]
 fn chanmon_fail_from_stale_commitment() {
@@ -49,11 +48,11 @@ fn chanmon_fail_from_stale_commitment() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
        let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
-       let (update_a, _, chan_id_2, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+       create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, channelmanager::provided_init_features(), channelmanager::provided_init_features());
+       let (update_a, _, chan_id_2, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2, channelmanager::provided_init_features(), channelmanager::provided_init_features());
 
        let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 1_000_000);
-       nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
 
        let bs_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_id_2);
@@ -106,7 +105,7 @@ fn revoked_output_htlc_resolution_timing() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 500_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+       let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 500_000_000, channelmanager::provided_init_features(), channelmanager::provided_init_features());
 
        let payment_hash_1 = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000).1;
 
@@ -125,9 +124,8 @@ fn revoked_output_htlc_resolution_timing() {
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
 
        let bs_spend_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
-       assert_eq!(bs_spend_txn.len(), 2);
+       assert_eq!(bs_spend_txn.len(), 1);
        check_spends!(bs_spend_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
-       check_spends!(bs_spend_txn[1], chan.3);
 
        // After the commitment transaction confirms, we should still wait on the HTLC spend
        // transaction to confirm before resolving the HTLC.
@@ -141,7 +139,7 @@ fn revoked_output_htlc_resolution_timing() {
        assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
 
        connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
-       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, true);
+       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, false);
 }
 
 #[test]
@@ -156,12 +154,12 @@ fn chanmon_claim_value_coop_close() {
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
        let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) =
-               create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 1_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+               create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 1_000_000, channelmanager::provided_init_features(), channelmanager::provided_init_features());
        let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
        assert_eq!(funding_outpoint.to_channel_id(), chan_id);
 
-       let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan_id) as u64;
-       let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], chan_id);
+       let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
+       let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
 
        assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
                        claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 1_000 - chan_feerate * channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) / 1000
@@ -172,9 +170,9 @@ fn chanmon_claim_value_coop_close() {
 
        nodes[0].node.close_channel(&chan_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
        let node_0_shutdown = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
-       nodes[1].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &node_0_shutdown);
+       nodes[1].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &channelmanager::provided_init_features(), &node_0_shutdown);
        let node_1_shutdown = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
-       nodes[0].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &node_1_shutdown);
+       nodes[0].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &channelmanager::provided_init_features(), &node_1_shutdown);
 
        let node_0_closing_signed = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendClosingSigned, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
        nodes[1].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_0_closing_signed);
@@ -257,7 +255,7 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) {
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
        let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) =
-               create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 1_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+               create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 1_000_000, channelmanager::provided_init_features(), channelmanager::provided_init_features());
        let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
        assert_eq!(funding_outpoint.to_channel_id(), chan_id);
 
@@ -271,8 +269,8 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) {
 
        let htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety
 
-       let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan_id) as u64;
-       let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], chan_id);
+       let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
+       let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
 
        let remote_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_id);
        // Before B receives the payment preimage, it only suggests the push_msat value of 1_000 sats
@@ -365,21 +363,14 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) {
        mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &remote_txn[0]);
 
        let b_broadcast_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
-       assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn.len(), if prev_commitment_tx { 4 } else { 5 });
-       if prev_commitment_tx {
-               check_spends!(b_broadcast_txn[3], b_broadcast_txn[2]);
-       } else {
-               assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn[0], b_broadcast_txn[3]);
-               assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn[1], b_broadcast_txn[4]);
-       }
-       // b_broadcast_txn[0] should spend the HTLC output of the commitment tx for 3_000 sats
+       assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn.len(), 2);
+       // b_broadcast_txn should spend the HTLCs output of the commitment tx for 3_000 and 4_000 sats
        check_spends!(b_broadcast_txn[0], remote_txn[0]);
        check_spends!(b_broadcast_txn[1], remote_txn[0]);
        assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
        assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
        assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[b_broadcast_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 3_000);
        assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[b_broadcast_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 4_000);
-       check_spends!(b_broadcast_txn[2], funding_tx);
 
        assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
@@ -429,7 +420,7 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) {
                sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
 
        connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
-       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], dust_payment_hash, true);
+       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], dust_payment_hash, false);
        connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
 
        // After ANTI_REORG_DELAY, A will consider its balance fully spendable and generate a
@@ -483,21 +474,20 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) {
        // When the HTLC timeout output is spendable in the next block, A should broadcast it
        connect_blocks(&nodes[0], htlc_cltv_timeout - nodes[0].best_block_info().1 - 1);
        let a_broadcast_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
-       assert_eq!(a_broadcast_txn.len(), 3);
-       check_spends!(a_broadcast_txn[0], funding_tx);
+       assert_eq!(a_broadcast_txn.len(), 2);
+       assert_eq!(a_broadcast_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
+       check_spends!(a_broadcast_txn[0], remote_txn[0]);
        assert_eq!(a_broadcast_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
        check_spends!(a_broadcast_txn[1], remote_txn[0]);
-       assert_eq!(a_broadcast_txn[2].input.len(), 1);
-       check_spends!(a_broadcast_txn[2], remote_txn[0]);
-       assert_ne!(a_broadcast_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout,
-                  a_broadcast_txn[2].input[0].previous_output.vout);
-       // a_broadcast_txn [1] and [2] should spend the HTLC outputs of the commitment tx
-       assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[a_broadcast_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 3_000);
-       assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[a_broadcast_txn[2].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 4_000);
+       assert_ne!(a_broadcast_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout,
+                  a_broadcast_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout);
+       // a_broadcast_txn [0] and [1] should spend the HTLC outputs of the commitment tx
+       assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[a_broadcast_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 3_000);
+       assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[a_broadcast_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 4_000);
 
        // Once the HTLC-Timeout transaction confirms, A will no longer consider the HTLC
        // "MaybeClaimable", but instead move it to "AwaitingConfirmations".
-       mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &a_broadcast_txn[2]);
+       mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &a_broadcast_txn[1]);
        assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
        assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
                        claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
@@ -509,9 +499,9 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) {
        connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
        assert_eq!(Vec::<Balance>::new(),
                nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
-       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], timeout_payment_hash, true);
+       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], timeout_payment_hash, false);
 
-       test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &a_broadcast_txn[2]);
+       test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &a_broadcast_txn[1]);
 
        // Node B will no longer consider the HTLC "contentious" after the HTLC claim transaction
        // confirms, and consider it simply "awaiting confirmations". Note that it has to wait for the
@@ -559,7 +549,7 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) {
        // Finally, mine the HTLC timeout transaction that A broadcasted (even though B should be able
        // to claim this HTLC with the preimage it knows!). It will remain listed as a claimable HTLC
        // until ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations on the spend.
-       mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &a_broadcast_txn[2]);
+       mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &a_broadcast_txn[1]);
        assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
                        claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
                        timeout_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
@@ -568,6 +558,16 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) {
        connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
        assert_eq!(Vec::<Balance>::new(),
                nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
+
+       // Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're
+       // using `ConnectStyle::HighlyRedundantTransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks`, we don't get new
+       // monitor events or claimable balances.
+       for node in nodes.iter() {
+               connect_blocks(node, 6);
+               connect_blocks(node, 6);
+               assert!(node.chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
+               assert!(node.chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
+       }
 }
 
 #[test]
@@ -594,12 +594,12 @@ fn test_balances_on_local_commitment_htlcs() {
 
        // Create a single channel with two pending HTLCs from nodes[0] to nodes[1], one which nodes[1]
        // knows the preimage for, one which it does not.
-       let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+       let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 0, channelmanager::provided_init_features(), channelmanager::provided_init_features());
        let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
 
        let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 10_000_000);
        let htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety
-       nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
 
        let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
@@ -607,10 +607,10 @@ fn test_balances_on_local_commitment_htlcs() {
        commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false);
 
        expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
-       expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash, payment_secret, 10_000_000);
+       expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash, payment_secret, 10_000_000);
 
        let (route_2, payment_hash_2, payment_preimage_2, payment_secret_2) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 20_000_000);
-       nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route_2, payment_hash_2, &Some(payment_secret_2)).unwrap();
+       nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route_2, payment_hash_2, &Some(payment_secret_2), PaymentId(payment_hash_2.0)).unwrap();
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
 
        let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
@@ -618,14 +618,14 @@ fn test_balances_on_local_commitment_htlcs() {
        commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false);
 
        expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
-       expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 20_000_000);
+       expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 20_000_000);
        nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_2);
        get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
        expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, 20_000_000);
 
-       let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan_id) as u64;
-       let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], chan_id);
+       let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
+       let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
 
        // Get nodes[0]'s commitment transaction and HTLC-Timeout transactions
        let as_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_id);
@@ -661,10 +661,8 @@ fn test_balances_on_local_commitment_htlcs() {
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
        check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
        let bs_htlc_claim_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
-       assert_eq!(bs_htlc_claim_txn.len(), 3);
+       assert_eq!(bs_htlc_claim_txn.len(), 1);
        check_spends!(bs_htlc_claim_txn[0], as_txn[0]);
-       check_spends!(bs_htlc_claim_txn[1], funding_tx);
-       check_spends!(bs_htlc_claim_txn[2], bs_htlc_claim_txn[1]);
 
        // Connect blocks until the HTLCs expire, allowing us to (validly) broadcast the HTLC-Timeout
        // transaction.
@@ -724,7 +722,7 @@ fn test_balances_on_local_commitment_htlcs() {
        // panicked as described in the test introduction. This will remove the "maybe claimable"
        // spendable output as nodes[1] has fully claimed the second HTLC.
        connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
-       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, true);
+       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false);
 
        assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
                        claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
@@ -751,6 +749,14 @@ fn test_balances_on_local_commitment_htlcs() {
        connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_a_htlc_claimable - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
        assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
        test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_txn[1]);
+
+       // Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're
+       // using `ConnectStyle::HighlyRedundantTransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks`, we don't get new
+       // monitor events or claimable balances.
+       connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 6);
+       connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 6);
+       assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
+       assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
 }
 
 #[test]
@@ -762,7 +768,7 @@ fn test_no_preimage_inbound_htlc_balances() {
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
-       let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 500_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+       let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 500_000_000, channelmanager::provided_init_features(), channelmanager::provided_init_features());
        let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
 
        // Send two HTLCs, one from A to B, and one from B to A.
@@ -770,8 +776,8 @@ fn test_no_preimage_inbound_htlc_balances() {
        let to_a_failed_payment_hash = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 20_000_000).1;
        let htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety
 
-       let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan_id) as u64;
-       let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], chan_id);
+       let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
+       let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
 
        // Both A and B will have an HTLC that's claimable on timeout and one that's claimable if they
        // receive the preimage. These will remain the same through the channel closure and until the
@@ -923,7 +929,7 @@ fn test_no_preimage_inbound_htlc_balances() {
        // Once as_htlc_timeout_claim[0] reaches ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations, we should get a
        // payment failure event.
        connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 2);
-       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], to_b_failed_payment_hash, true);
+       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], to_b_failed_payment_hash, false);
 
        connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1);
        assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
@@ -972,7 +978,7 @@ fn test_no_preimage_inbound_htlc_balances() {
                sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
 
        connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 2);
-       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], to_a_failed_payment_hash, true);
+       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], to_a_failed_payment_hash, false);
 
        assert_eq!(vec![Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
                        claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
@@ -983,6 +989,14 @@ fn test_no_preimage_inbound_htlc_balances() {
 
        connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
        assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
+
+       // Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're
+       // using `ConnectStyle::HighlyRedundantTransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks`, we don't get new
+       // monitor events or claimable balances.
+       connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 6);
+       connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 6);
+       assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
+       assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
 }
 
 fn sorted_vec_with_additions<T: Ord + Clone>(v_orig: &Vec<T>, extra_ts: &[&T]) -> Vec<T> {
@@ -1007,7 +1021,7 @@ fn do_test_revoked_counterparty_commitment_balances(confirm_htlc_spend_first: bo
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
        let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) =
-               create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 100_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+               create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 100_000_000, channelmanager::provided_init_features(), channelmanager::provided_init_features());
        let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
        assert_eq!(funding_outpoint.to_channel_id(), chan_id);
 
@@ -1038,9 +1052,9 @@ fn do_test_revoked_counterparty_commitment_balances(confirm_htlc_spend_first: bo
 
        // Get the latest commitment transaction from A and then update the fee to revoke it
        let as_revoked_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_id);
-       let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], chan_id);
+       let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
 
-       let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan_id) as u64;
+       let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
 
        let missing_htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety
        let missing_htlc_payment_hash = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 2_000_000).1;
@@ -1216,22 +1230,30 @@ fn do_test_revoked_counterparty_commitment_balances(confirm_htlc_spend_first: bo
 
        let mut payment_failed_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
        expect_payment_failed_conditions_event(&nodes[1], payment_failed_events.pop().unwrap(),
-               dust_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
+               dust_payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
        expect_payment_failed_conditions_event(&nodes[1], payment_failed_events.pop().unwrap(),
-               missing_htlc_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
+               missing_htlc_payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
        assert!(payment_failed_events.is_empty());
 
        connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
        test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[if confirm_htlc_spend_first { 2 } else { 3 }]);
        connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
        test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[if confirm_htlc_spend_first { 3 } else { 2 }]);
-       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], live_payment_hash, true);
+       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], live_payment_hash, false);
        connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
        test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[0]);
        connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
        test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[1]);
-       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], timeout_payment_hash, true);
+       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], timeout_payment_hash, false);
        assert_eq!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances(), Vec::new());
+
+       // Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're
+       // using `ConnectStyle::HighlyRedundantTransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks`, we don't get new
+       // monitor events or claimable balances.
+       connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 6);
+       connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 6);
+       assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
+       assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
 }
 
 #[test]
@@ -1251,7 +1273,7 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_htlc_tx_balances() {
 
        // Create some initial channels
        let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) =
-               create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 11_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+               create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 11_000_000, channelmanager::provided_init_features(), channelmanager::provided_init_features());
        let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
        assert_eq!(funding_outpoint.to_channel_id(), chan_id);
 
@@ -1266,8 +1288,8 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_htlc_tx_balances() {
 
        claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage);
 
-       let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan_id) as u64;
-       let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], chan_id);
+       let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
+       let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
 
        // B will generate an HTLC-Success from its revoked commitment tx
        mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
@@ -1276,11 +1298,10 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_htlc_tx_balances() {
        check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
        let revoked_htlc_success_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
 
-       assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_success_txn.len(), 2);
+       assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_success_txn.len(), 1);
        assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_success_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
        assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_success_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
        check_spends!(revoked_htlc_success_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
-       check_spends!(revoked_htlc_success_txn[1], funding_tx);
 
        connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV);
        let revoked_htlc_timeout_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
@@ -1298,9 +1319,8 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_htlc_tx_balances() {
        let to_remote_conf_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1;
 
        let as_commitment_claim_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
-       assert_eq!(as_commitment_claim_txn.len(), 2);
+       assert_eq!(as_commitment_claim_txn.len(), 1);
        check_spends!(as_commitment_claim_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
-       check_spends!(as_commitment_claim_txn[1], funding_tx);
 
        // The next two checks have the same balance set for A - even though we confirm a revoked HTLC
        // transaction our balance tracking doesn't use the on-chain value so the
@@ -1438,6 +1458,14 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_htlc_tx_balances() {
        test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_second_htlc_claim_tx[1]);
 
        assert_eq!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances(), Vec::new());
+
+       // Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're
+       // using `ConnectStyle::HighlyRedundantTransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks`, we don't get new
+       // monitor events or claimable balances.
+       connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 6);
+       connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 6);
+       assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
+       assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
 }
 
 #[test]
@@ -1455,7 +1483,7 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() {
        let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
 
        let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) =
-               create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 100_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+               create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 100_000_000, channelmanager::provided_init_features(), channelmanager::provided_init_features());
        let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
        assert_eq!(funding_outpoint.to_channel_id(), chan_id);
 
@@ -1480,8 +1508,8 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() {
        check_spends!(as_revoked_txn[0], funding_tx);
        check_spends!(as_revoked_txn[1], as_revoked_txn[0]); // The HTLC-Claim transaction
 
-       let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], chan_id);
-       let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan_id) as u64;
+       let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
+       let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
 
        {
                let mut feerate = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
@@ -1626,7 +1654,15 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() {
        assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); // We shouldn't fail the payment until we spend the output
 
        connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 5);
-       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], revoked_payment_hash, true);
+       expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], revoked_payment_hash, false);
        test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[0]);
        assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
+
+       // Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're
+       // using `ConnectStyle::HighlyRedundantTransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks`, we don't get new
+       // monitor events or claimable balances.
+       connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 6);
+       connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 6);
+       assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
+       assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
 }