Merge pull request #2599 from Evanfeenstra/peel-onion
[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / ln / outbound_payment.rs
index 2522f99fbe85dbecd751034215207cbda23ad5ab..d6d9f7aaca02f7fb3ae7296467a91fa6414dba29 100644 (file)
@@ -594,10 +594,26 @@ impl RecipientOnionFields {
        /// Note that if this field is non-empty, it will contain strictly increasing TLVs, each
        /// represented by a `(u64, Vec<u8>)` for its type number and serialized value respectively.
        /// This is validated when setting this field using [`Self::with_custom_tlvs`].
+       #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
        pub fn custom_tlvs(&self) -> &Vec<(u64, Vec<u8>)> {
                &self.custom_tlvs
        }
 
+       /// Gets the custom TLVs that will be sent or have been received.
+       ///
+       /// Custom TLVs allow sending extra application-specific data with a payment. They provide
+       /// additional flexibility on top of payment metadata, as while other implementations may
+       /// require `payment_metadata` to reflect metadata provided in an invoice, custom TLVs
+       /// do not have this restriction.
+       ///
+       /// Note that if this field is non-empty, it will contain strictly increasing TLVs, each
+       /// represented by a `(u64, Vec<u8>)` for its type number and serialized value respectively.
+       /// This is validated when setting this field using [`Self::with_custom_tlvs`].
+       #[cfg(c_bindings)]
+       pub fn custom_tlvs(&self) -> Vec<(u64, Vec<u8>)> {
+               self.custom_tlvs.clone()
+       }
+
        /// When we have received some HTLC(s) towards an MPP payment, as we receive further HTLC(s) we
        /// have to make sure that some fields match exactly across the parts. For those that aren't
        /// required to match, if they don't match we should remove them so as to not expose data
@@ -885,12 +901,10 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
                        RetryableSendFailure::RouteNotFound
                })?;
 
-               if let Some(route_route_params) = route.route_params.as_mut() {
-                       if route_route_params.final_value_msat != route_params.final_value_msat {
-                               debug_assert!(false,
-                                       "Routers are expected to return a route which includes the requested final_value_msat");
-                               route_route_params.final_value_msat = route_params.final_value_msat;
-                       }
+               if route.route_params.as_ref() != Some(&route_params) {
+                       debug_assert!(false,
+                               "Routers are expected to return a Route which includes the requested RouteParameters");
+                       route.route_params = Some(route_params.clone());
                }
 
                let onion_session_privs = self.add_new_pending_payment(payment_hash,
@@ -947,12 +961,10 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
                        }
                };
 
-               if let Some(route_route_params) = route.route_params.as_mut() {
-                       if route_route_params.final_value_msat != route_params.final_value_msat {
-                               debug_assert!(false,
-                                       "Routers are expected to return a route which includes the requested final_value_msat");
-                               route_route_params.final_value_msat = route_params.final_value_msat;
-                       }
+               if route.route_params.as_ref() != Some(&route_params) {
+                       debug_assert!(false,
+                               "Routers are expected to return a Route which includes the requested RouteParameters");
+                       route.route_params = Some(route_params.clone());
                }
 
                for path in route.paths.iter() {
@@ -1502,6 +1514,9 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
                &self, pending_events: &Mutex<VecDeque<(events::Event, Option<EventCompletionAction>)>>)
        {
                let mut pending_outbound_payments = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
+               #[cfg(not(invreqfailed))]
+               let pending_events = pending_events.lock().unwrap();
+               #[cfg(invreqfailed)]
                let mut pending_events = pending_events.lock().unwrap();
                pending_outbound_payments.retain(|payment_id, payment| {
                        // If an outbound payment was completed, and no pending HTLCs remain, we should remove it
@@ -1540,6 +1555,7 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
                                if *timer_ticks_without_response <= INVOICE_REQUEST_TIMEOUT_TICKS {
                                        true
                                } else {
+                                       #[cfg(invreqfailed)]
                                        pending_events.push_back(
                                                (events::Event::InvoiceRequestFailed { payment_id: *payment_id }, None)
                                        );
@@ -1692,6 +1708,7 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
                                        payment.remove();
                                }
                        } else if let PendingOutboundPayment::AwaitingInvoice { .. } = payment.get() {
+                               #[cfg(invreqfailed)]
                                pending_events.lock().unwrap().push_back((events::Event::InvoiceRequestFailed {
                                        payment_id,
                                }, None));
@@ -1782,7 +1799,9 @@ mod tests {
        use crate::ln::channelmanager::{PaymentId, RecipientOnionFields};
        use crate::ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, NodeFeatures};
        use crate::ln::msgs::{ErrorAction, LightningError};
-       use crate::ln::outbound_payment::{Bolt12PaymentError, INVOICE_REQUEST_TIMEOUT_TICKS, OutboundPayments, Retry, RetryableSendFailure};
+       use crate::ln::outbound_payment::{Bolt12PaymentError, OutboundPayments, Retry, RetryableSendFailure};
+       #[cfg(invreqfailed)]
+       use crate::ln::outbound_payment::INVOICE_REQUEST_TIMEOUT_TICKS;
        use crate::offers::invoice::DEFAULT_RELATIVE_EXPIRY;
        use crate::offers::offer::OfferBuilder;
        use crate::offers::test_utils::*;
@@ -1935,7 +1954,9 @@ mod tests {
                router.expect_find_route(route_params.clone(), Ok(route.clone()));
                let mut route_params_w_failed_scid = route_params.clone();
                route_params_w_failed_scid.payment_params.previously_failed_channels.push(failed_scid);
-               router.expect_find_route(route_params_w_failed_scid, Ok(route.clone()));
+               let mut route_w_failed_scid = route.clone();
+               route_w_failed_scid.route_params = Some(route_params_w_failed_scid.clone());
+               router.expect_find_route(route_params_w_failed_scid, Ok(route_w_failed_scid));
                router.expect_find_route(route_params.clone(), Ok(route.clone()));
                router.expect_find_route(route_params.clone(), Ok(route.clone()));
 
@@ -1985,6 +2006,7 @@ mod tests {
        }
 
        #[test]
+       #[cfg(invreqfailed)]
        fn removes_stale_awaiting_invoice() {
                let pending_events = Mutex::new(VecDeque::new());
                let outbound_payments = OutboundPayments::new();
@@ -2023,6 +2045,7 @@ mod tests {
        }
 
        #[test]
+       #[cfg(invreqfailed)]
        fn removes_abandoned_awaiting_invoice() {
                let pending_events = Mutex::new(VecDeque::new());
                let outbound_payments = OutboundPayments::new();