Implement routing against the netgraph in tests
[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / ln / reorg_tests.rs
index f6754e8bf2dc8d6e11f0a56370117436bddd57cb..c261c3d6eadfd3516f8c045d876f1cb098e0b6cc 100644 (file)
@@ -82,10 +82,7 @@ fn do_test_onchain_htlc_reorg(local_commitment: bool, claim: bool) {
                check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true); // We should get a BroadcastChannelUpdate (and *only* a BroadcstChannelUpdate)
                check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
                let node_2_commitment_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
-               assert_eq!(node_2_commitment_txn.len(), 3); // ChannelMonitor: 1 offered HTLC-Claim, ChannelManger: 1 local commitment tx, 1 Received HTLC-Claim
-               assert_eq!(node_2_commitment_txn[1].output.len(), 2); // to-remote and Received HTLC (to-self is dust)
-               check_spends!(node_2_commitment_txn[1], chan_2.3);
-               check_spends!(node_2_commitment_txn[2], node_2_commitment_txn[1]);
+               assert_eq!(node_2_commitment_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: 1 offered HTLC-Claim
                check_spends!(node_2_commitment_txn[0], node_1_commitment_txn[0]);
 
                // Make sure node 1's height is the same as the !local_commitment case
@@ -108,13 +105,11 @@ fn do_test_onchain_htlc_reorg(local_commitment: bool, claim: bool) {
                mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_2_commitment_txn[0]);
                connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 1); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
                let node_1_commitment_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
-               assert_eq!(node_1_commitment_txn.len(), 2); // ChannelMonitor: 1 offered HTLC-Timeout, ChannelManger: 1 local commitment tx
-               assert_eq!(node_1_commitment_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // to-local and Offered HTLC (to-remote is dust)
-               check_spends!(node_1_commitment_txn[0], chan_2.3);
-               check_spends!(node_1_commitment_txn[1], node_2_commitment_txn[0]);
+               assert_eq!(node_1_commitment_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: 1 offered HTLC-Timeout
+               check_spends!(node_1_commitment_txn[0], node_2_commitment_txn[0]);
 
                // Confirm node 1's HTLC-Timeout on node 1
-               mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_1_commitment_txn[1]);
+               mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_1_commitment_txn[0]);
                // ...but return node 2's commitment tx (and claim) in case claim is set and we're preparing to reorg
                vec![node_2_commitment_txn.pop().unwrap()]
        };
@@ -265,7 +260,7 @@ fn do_test_unconf_chan(reload_node: bool, reorg_after_reload: bool, use_funding_
        let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
        let persister: test_utils::TestPersister;
        let new_chain_monitor: test_utils::TestChainMonitor;
-       let nodes_0_deserialized: ChannelManager<&test_utils::TestChainMonitor, &test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &test_utils::TestLogger>;
+       let nodes_0_deserialized: ChannelManager<&test_utils::TestChainMonitor, &test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &test_utils::TestRouter, &test_utils::TestLogger>;
        let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
        *nodes[0].connect_style.borrow_mut() = connect_style;
 
@@ -277,6 +272,9 @@ fn do_test_unconf_chan(reload_node: bool, reorg_after_reload: bool, use_funding_
        assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.short_to_chan_info.read().unwrap().len(), 2);
        mem::drop(channel_state);
 
+       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].confirmations, Some(10));
+       assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels()[0].confirmations, Some(10));
+
        if !reorg_after_reload {
                if use_funding_unconfirmed {
                        let relevant_txids = nodes[0].node.get_relevant_txids();
@@ -287,12 +285,16 @@ fn do_test_unconf_chan(reload_node: bool, reorg_after_reload: bool, use_funding_
                        let txid = relevant_txids[0].0;
                        assert_eq!(txid, chan.3.txid());
                        nodes[0].node.transaction_unconfirmed(&txid);
+                       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 0);
                } else if connect_style == ConnectStyle::FullBlockViaListen {
                        disconnect_blocks(&nodes[0], CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH - 1);
                        assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 1);
+                       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].confirmations, Some(1));
                        disconnect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1);
+                       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 0);
                } else {
                        disconnect_all_blocks(&nodes[0]);
+                       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 0);
                }
 
                let relevant_txids = nodes[0].node.get_relevant_txids();
@@ -334,12 +336,16 @@ fn do_test_unconf_chan(reload_node: bool, reorg_after_reload: bool, use_funding_
                        let txid = relevant_txids[0].0;
                        assert_eq!(txid, chan.3.txid());
                        nodes[0].node.transaction_unconfirmed(&txid);
+                       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
                } else if connect_style == ConnectStyle::FullBlockViaListen {
                        disconnect_blocks(&nodes[0], CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH - 1);
                        assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
+                       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].confirmations, Some(1));
                        disconnect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1);
+                       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 0);
                } else {
                        disconnect_all_blocks(&nodes[0]);
+                       assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 0);
                }
 
                let relevant_txids = nodes[0].node.get_relevant_txids();
@@ -448,12 +454,9 @@ fn test_set_outpoints_partial_claiming() {
        // Verify node A broadcast tx claiming both HTLCs
        {
                let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
-               // ChannelMonitor: claim tx, ChannelManager: local commitment tx + HTLC-Success*2
-               assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 4);
+               // ChannelMonitor: claim tx
+               assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
                check_spends!(node_txn[0], remote_txn[0]);
-               check_spends!(node_txn[1], chan.3);
-               check_spends!(node_txn[2], node_txn[1]);
-               check_spends!(node_txn[3], node_txn[1]);
                assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 2);
                node_txn.clear();
        }
@@ -542,11 +545,6 @@ fn do_test_to_remote_after_local_detection(style: ConnectStyle) {
        check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
        check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
 
-       // Drop transactions broadcasted in response to the first commitment transaction (we have good
-       // test coverage of these things already elsewhere).
-       assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0).len(), 1);
-       assert_eq!(nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0).len(), 1);
-
        assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
        assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());