Add outbound min/max to `ChannelCounterparty`
[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / routing / router.rs
index 677a571620ce31a329f8b046d294a8d99b1c2387..212ac2f10cae7d62695f032c6fd8ab0a4e523ffa 100644 (file)
@@ -332,11 +332,9 @@ struct RouteGraphNode {
 impl cmp::Ord for RouteGraphNode {
        fn cmp(&self, other: &RouteGraphNode) -> cmp::Ordering {
                let other_score = cmp::max(other.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, other.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
-                       .checked_add(other.path_penalty_msat)
-                       .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+                       .saturating_add(other.path_penalty_msat);
                let self_score = cmp::max(self.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, self.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
-                       .checked_add(self.path_penalty_msat)
-                       .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+                       .saturating_add(self.path_penalty_msat);
                other_score.cmp(&self_score).then_with(|| other.node_id.cmp(&self.node_id))
        }
 }
@@ -495,6 +493,10 @@ impl<'a> PaymentPath<'a> {
                self.hops.last().unwrap().0.fee_msat
        }
 
+       fn get_path_penalty_msat(&self) -> u64 {
+               self.hops.first().map(|h| h.0.path_penalty_msat).unwrap_or(u64::max_value())
+       }
+
        fn get_total_fee_paid_msat(&self) -> u64 {
                if self.hops.len() < 1 {
                        return 0;
@@ -509,6 +511,10 @@ impl<'a> PaymentPath<'a> {
                return result;
        }
 
+       fn get_cost_msat(&self) -> u64 {
+               self.get_total_fee_paid_msat().saturating_add(self.get_path_penalty_msat())
+       }
+
        // If the amount transferred by the path is updated, the fees should be adjusted. Any other way
        // to change fees may result in an inconsistency.
        //
@@ -596,6 +602,17 @@ fn compute_fees(amount_msat: u64, channel_fees: RoutingFees) -> Option<u64> {
        }
 }
 
+/// The default `features` we assume for a node in a route, when no `features` are known about that
+/// specific node.
+///
+/// Default features are:
+/// * variable_length_onion_optional
+fn default_node_features() -> NodeFeatures {
+       let mut features = NodeFeatures::empty();
+       features.set_variable_length_onion_optional();
+       features
+}
+
 /// Finds a route from us (payer) to the given target node (payee).
 ///
 /// If the payee provided features in their invoice, they should be provided via `params.payee`.
@@ -645,7 +662,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
 pub(crate) fn get_route<L: Deref, S: Score>(
        our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, payment_params: &PaymentParameters, network_graph: &ReadOnlyNetworkGraph,
        first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
-       logger: L, scorer: &S, _random_seed_bytes: &[u8; 32]
+       logger: L, scorer: &S, random_seed_bytes: &[u8; 32]
 ) -> Result<Route, LightningError>
 where L::Target: Logger {
        let payee_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&payment_params.payee_pubkey);
@@ -856,7 +873,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
                                        .entry(short_channel_id)
                                        .or_insert_with(|| $candidate.effective_capacity().as_msat());
 
-                               // It is tricky to substract $next_hops_fee_msat from available liquidity here.
+                               // It is tricky to subtract $next_hops_fee_msat from available liquidity here.
                                // It may be misleading because we might later choose to reduce the value transferred
                                // over these channels, and the channel which was insufficient might become sufficient.
                                // Worst case: we drop a good channel here because it can't cover the high following
@@ -896,8 +913,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
                                                .checked_sub(2*MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA)
                                                .unwrap_or(payment_params.max_total_cltv_expiry_delta - final_cltv_expiry_delta);
                                        let hop_total_cltv_delta = ($next_hops_cltv_delta as u32)
-                                               .checked_add($candidate.cltv_expiry_delta())
-                                               .unwrap_or(u32::max_value());
+                                               .saturating_add($candidate.cltv_expiry_delta());
                                        let doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit = hop_total_cltv_delta <= max_total_cltv_expiry_delta;
 
                                        let value_contribution_msat = cmp::min(available_value_contribution_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution);
@@ -911,14 +927,20 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
                                        let over_path_minimum_msat = amount_to_transfer_over_msat >= $candidate.htlc_minimum_msat() &&
                                                amount_to_transfer_over_msat >= $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat;
 
+                                       #[allow(unused_comparisons)] // $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat is 0 in some calls so rustc complains
+                                       let may_overpay_to_meet_path_minimum_msat =
+                                               ((amount_to_transfer_over_msat < $candidate.htlc_minimum_msat() &&
+                                                 recommended_value_msat > $candidate.htlc_minimum_msat()) ||
+                                                (amount_to_transfer_over_msat < $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat &&
+                                                 recommended_value_msat > $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat));
+
                                        // If HTLC minimum is larger than the amount we're going to transfer, we shouldn't
-                                       // bother considering this channel.
-                                       // Since we're choosing amount_to_transfer_over_msat as maximum possible, it can
-                                       // be only reduced later (not increased), so this channel should just be skipped
-                                       // as not sufficient.
-                                       if !over_path_minimum_msat && doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit {
+                                       // bother considering this channel. If retrying with recommended_value_msat may
+                                       // allow us to hit the HTLC minimum limit, set htlc_minimum_limit so that we go
+                                       // around again with a higher amount.
+                                       if contributes_sufficient_value && doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit && may_overpay_to_meet_path_minimum_msat {
                                                hit_minimum_limit = true;
-                                       } else if contributes_sufficient_value && doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit {
+                                       } else if contributes_sufficient_value && doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit && over_path_minimum_msat {
                                                // Note that low contribution here (limited by available_liquidity_msat)
                                                // might violate htlc_minimum_msat on the hops which are next along the
                                                // payment path (upstream to the payee). To avoid that, we recompute
@@ -1004,9 +1026,9 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
                                                                }
                                                        }
 
-                                                       let path_penalty_msat = $next_hops_path_penalty_msat.checked_add(
-                                                               scorer.channel_penalty_msat(short_channel_id, amount_to_transfer_over_msat, *available_liquidity_msat,
-                                                                       &$src_node_id, &$dest_node_id)).unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+                                                       let path_penalty_msat = $next_hops_path_penalty_msat.saturating_add(
+                                                               scorer.channel_penalty_msat(short_channel_id, amount_to_transfer_over_msat,
+                                                                       *available_liquidity_msat, &$src_node_id, &$dest_node_id));
                                                        let new_graph_node = RouteGraphNode {
                                                                node_id: $src_node_id,
                                                                lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node: total_fee_msat,
@@ -1034,11 +1056,9 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
                                                        // the fees included in $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, but also
                                                        // can't use something that may decrease on future hops.
                                                        let old_cost = cmp::max(old_entry.total_fee_msat, old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
-                                                               .checked_add(old_entry.path_penalty_msat)
-                                                               .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+                                                               .saturating_add(old_entry.path_penalty_msat);
                                                        let new_cost = cmp::max(total_fee_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat)
-                                                               .checked_add(path_penalty_msat)
-                                                               .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+                                                               .saturating_add(path_penalty_msat);
 
                                                        if !old_entry.was_processed && new_cost < old_cost {
                                                                targets.push(new_graph_node);
@@ -1092,7 +1112,8 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
                } }
        }
 
-       let empty_node_features = NodeFeatures::empty();
+       let default_node_features = default_node_features();
+
        // Find ways (channels with destination) to reach a given node and store them
        // in the corresponding data structures (routing graph etc).
        // $fee_to_target_msat represents how much it costs to reach to this node from the payee,
@@ -1123,7 +1144,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
                                let features = if let Some(node_info) = $node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
                                        &node_info.features
                                } else {
-                                       &empty_node_features
+                                       &default_node_features
                                };
 
                                if !features.requires_unknown_bits() {
@@ -1222,12 +1243,10 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
                                                .unwrap_or_else(|| CandidateRouteHop::PrivateHop { hint: hop });
                                        let capacity_msat = candidate.effective_capacity().as_msat();
                                        aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat = aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat
-                                               .checked_add(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(hop.short_channel_id, final_value_msat, capacity_msat, &source, &target))
-                                               .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+                                               .saturating_add(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(hop.short_channel_id, final_value_msat, capacity_msat, &source, &target));
 
                                        aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta = aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta
-                                               .checked_add(hop.cltv_expiry_delta as u32)
-                                               .unwrap_or_else(|| u32::max_value());
+                                               .saturating_add(hop.cltv_expiry_delta as u32);
 
                                        if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta) {
                                                // If this hop was not used then there is no use checking the preceding hops
@@ -1305,7 +1324,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
                        // traversing the graph and arrange the path out of what we found.
                        if node_id == our_node_id {
                                let mut new_entry = dist.remove(&our_node_id).unwrap();
-                               let mut ordered_hops = vec!((new_entry.clone(), NodeFeatures::empty()));
+                               let mut ordered_hops = vec!((new_entry.clone(), default_node_features.clone()));
 
                                'path_walk: loop {
                                        let mut features_set = false;
@@ -1323,7 +1342,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
                                                        if let Some(node_info) = node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
                                                                ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = node_info.features.clone();
                                                        } else {
-                                                               ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = NodeFeatures::empty();
+                                                               ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = default_node_features.clone();
                                                        }
                                                } else {
                                                        // We can fill in features for everything except hops which were
@@ -1350,7 +1369,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
                                        // so that fees paid for a HTLC forwarding on the current channel are
                                        // associated with the previous channel (where they will be subtracted).
                                        ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.fee_msat = new_entry.hop_use_fee_msat;
-                                       ordered_hops.push((new_entry.clone(), NodeFeatures::empty()));
+                                       ordered_hops.push((new_entry.clone(), default_node_features.clone()));
                                }
                                ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.fee_msat = value_contribution_msat;
                                ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.hop_use_fee_msat = 0;
@@ -1393,7 +1412,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
                                        // If we weren't capped by hitting a liquidity limit on a channel in the path,
                                        // we'll probably end up picking the same path again on the next iteration.
                                        // Decrease the available liquidity of a hop in the middle of the path.
-                                       let victim_scid = payment_path.hops[(payment_path.hops.len() - 1) / 2].0.candidate.short_channel_id();
+                                       let victim_scid = payment_path.hops[(payment_path.hops.len()) / 2].0.candidate.short_channel_id();
                                        log_trace!(logger, "Disabling channel {} for future path building iterations to avoid duplicates.", victim_scid);
                                        let victim_liquidity = bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&victim_scid).unwrap();
                                        *victim_liquidity = 0;
@@ -1465,24 +1484,31 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
        }
 
        // Sort by total fees and take the best paths.
-       payment_paths.sort_by_key(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat());
+       payment_paths.sort_unstable_by_key(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat());
        if payment_paths.len() > 50 {
                payment_paths.truncate(50);
        }
 
        // Draw multiple sufficient routes by randomly combining the selected paths.
        let mut drawn_routes = Vec::new();
-       for i in 0..payment_paths.len() {
+       let mut prng = ChaCha20::new(random_seed_bytes, &[0u8; 12]);
+       let mut random_index_bytes = [0u8; ::core::mem::size_of::<usize>()];
+
+       let num_permutations = payment_paths.len();
+       for _ in 0..num_permutations {
                let mut cur_route = Vec::<PaymentPath>::new();
                let mut aggregate_route_value_msat = 0;
 
                // Step (6).
-               // TODO: real random shuffle
-               // Currently just starts with i_th and goes up to i-1_th in a looped way.
-               let cur_payment_paths = [&payment_paths[i..], &payment_paths[..i]].concat();
+               // Do a Fisher-Yates shuffle to create a random permutation of the payment paths
+               for cur_index in (1..payment_paths.len()).rev() {
+                       prng.process_in_place(&mut random_index_bytes);
+                       let random_index = usize::from_be_bytes(random_index_bytes).wrapping_rem(cur_index+1);
+                       payment_paths.swap(cur_index, random_index);
+               }
 
                // Step (7).
-               for payment_path in cur_payment_paths {
+               for payment_path in &payment_paths {
                        cur_route.push(payment_path.clone());
                        aggregate_route_value_msat += payment_path.get_value_msat();
                        if aggregate_route_value_msat > final_value_msat {
@@ -1492,12 +1518,16 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
                                // also makes routing more reliable.
                                let mut overpaid_value_msat = aggregate_route_value_msat - final_value_msat;
 
-                               // First, drop some expensive low-value paths entirely if possible.
-                               // Sort by value so that we drop many really-low values first, since
-                               // fewer paths is better: the payment is less likely to fail.
-                               // TODO: this could also be optimized by also sorting by feerate_per_sat_routed,
-                               // so that the sender pays less fees overall. And also htlc_minimum_msat.
-                               cur_route.sort_by_key(|path| path.get_value_msat());
+                               // First, we drop some expensive low-value paths entirely if possible, since fewer
+                               // paths is better: the payment is less likely to fail. In order to do so, we sort
+                               // by value and fall back to total fees paid, i.e., in case of equal values we
+                               // prefer lower cost paths.
+                               cur_route.sort_unstable_by(|a, b| {
+                                       a.get_value_msat().cmp(&b.get_value_msat())
+                                               // Reverse ordering for cost, so we drop higher-cost paths first
+                                               .then_with(|| b.get_cost_msat().cmp(&a.get_cost_msat()))
+                               });
+
                                // We should make sure that at least 1 path left.
                                let mut paths_left = cur_route.len();
                                cur_route.retain(|path| {
@@ -1521,13 +1551,14 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
                                assert!(cur_route.len() > 0);
 
                                // Step (8).
-                               // Now, substract the overpaid value from the most-expensive path.
+                               // Now, subtract the overpaid value from the most-expensive path.
                                // TODO: this could also be optimized by also sorting by feerate_per_sat_routed,
                                // so that the sender pays less fees overall. And also htlc_minimum_msat.
-                               cur_route.sort_by_key(|path| { path.hops.iter().map(|hop| hop.0.candidate.fees().proportional_millionths as u64).sum::<u64>() });
+                               cur_route.sort_unstable_by_key(|path| { path.hops.iter().map(|hop| hop.0.candidate.fees().proportional_millionths as u64).sum::<u64>() });
                                let expensive_payment_path = cur_route.first_mut().unwrap();
-                               // We already dropped all the small channels above, meaning all the
-                               // remaining channels are larger than remaining overpaid_value_msat.
+
+                               // We already dropped all the small value paths above, meaning all the
+                               // remaining paths are larger than remaining overpaid_value_msat.
                                // Thus, this can't be negative.
                                let expensive_path_new_value_msat = expensive_payment_path.get_value_msat() - overpaid_value_msat;
                                expensive_payment_path.update_value_and_recompute_fees(expensive_path_new_value_msat);
@@ -1538,8 +1569,8 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
        }
 
        // Step (9).
-       // Select the best route by lowest total fee.
-       drawn_routes.sort_by_key(|paths| paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat()).sum::<u64>());
+       // Select the best route by lowest total cost.
+       drawn_routes.sort_unstable_by_key(|paths| paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_cost_msat()).sum::<u64>());
        let mut selected_paths = Vec::<Vec<Result<RouteHop, LightningError>>>::new();
        for payment_path in drawn_routes.first().unwrap() {
                let mut path = payment_path.hops.iter().map(|(payment_hop, node_features)| {
@@ -1665,7 +1696,7 @@ fn add_random_cltv_offset(route: &mut Route, payment_params: &PaymentParameters,
 #[cfg(test)]
 mod tests {
        use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NetGraphMsgHandler, NodeId};
-       use routing::router::{get_route, add_random_cltv_offset, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteHop, RoutingFees, DEFAULT_MAX_TOTAL_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
+       use routing::router::{get_route, add_random_cltv_offset, default_node_features, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteHop, RoutingFees, DEFAULT_MAX_TOTAL_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
        use routing::scoring::Score;
        use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
        use chain::keysinterface::KeysInterface;
@@ -1704,8 +1735,11 @@ mod tests {
                                node_id,
                                unspendable_punishment_reserve: 0,
                                forwarding_info: None,
+                               outbound_htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+                               outbound_htlc_maximum_msat: None,
                        },
                        funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }),
+                       channel_type: None,
                        short_channel_id,
                        inbound_scid_alias: None,
                        channel_value_satoshis: 0,
@@ -1718,6 +1752,8 @@ mod tests {
                        force_close_spend_delay: None,
                        is_outbound: true, is_funding_locked: true,
                        is_usable: true, is_public: true,
+                       inbound_htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+                       inbound_htlc_maximum_msat: None,
                }
        }
 
@@ -2765,7 +2801,7 @@ mod tests {
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
-               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
        }
 
@@ -2841,7 +2877,7 @@ mod tests {
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
-               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
        }
 
@@ -2938,7 +2974,7 @@ mod tests {
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[1].short_channel_id);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
-               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
        }
 
@@ -3003,14 +3039,14 @@ mod tests {
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[0].short_channel_id);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 0);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].cltv_expiry_delta, 129);
-               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
 
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].pubkey, nodes[6]);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[1].short_channel_id);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
-               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
        }
 
@@ -3101,7 +3137,7 @@ mod tests {
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
-               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
        }
 
@@ -3131,7 +3167,7 @@ mod tests {
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 8);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 100);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
-               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
 
                last_hops[0].0[0].fees.base_msat = 1000;
@@ -3168,7 +3204,7 @@ mod tests {
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, 10);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
-               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
 
                // ...but still use 8 for larger payments as 6 has a variable feerate
@@ -3209,7 +3245,7 @@ mod tests {
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 2000);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
-               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
        }
 
@@ -3261,7 +3297,7 @@ mod tests {
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 8);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 1000000);
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
-               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &[0; 0]); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+               assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
                assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &[0; 0]); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
        }
 
@@ -5424,10 +5460,13 @@ mod benches {
                                node_id,
                                unspendable_punishment_reserve: 0,
                                forwarding_info: None,
+                               outbound_htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+                               outbound_htlc_maximum_msat: None,
                        },
                        funding_txo: Some(OutPoint {
                                txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0
                        }),
+                       channel_type: None,
                        short_channel_id: Some(1),
                        inbound_scid_alias: None,
                        channel_value_satoshis: 10_000_000,
@@ -5442,6 +5481,8 @@ mod benches {
                        is_funding_locked: true,
                        is_usable: true,
                        is_public: true,
+                       inbound_htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+                       inbound_htlc_maximum_msat: None,
                }
        }