//! You probably want to create a NetGraphMsgHandler and use that as your RoutingMessageHandler and then
//! interrogate it to get routes for your own payments.
-use bitcoin::secp256k1::key::PublicKey;
+use bitcoin::secp256k1::PublicKey;
use ln::channelmanager::ChannelDetails;
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs::{DecodeError, ErrorAction, LightningError, MAX_VALUE_MSAT};
-use routing::scoring::Score;
-use routing::network_graph::{DirectedChannelInfoWithUpdate, EffectiveCapacity, NetworkGraph, NodeId, RoutingFees};
-use util::ser::{Writeable, Readable};
+use routing::scoring::{ChannelUsage, Score};
+use routing::network_graph::{DirectedChannelInfoWithUpdate, EffectiveCapacity, NetworkGraph, ReadOnlyNetworkGraph, NodeId, RoutingFees};
+use util::ser::{Writeable, Readable, Writer};
use util::logger::{Level, Logger};
+use util::chacha20::ChaCha20;
use io;
use prelude::*;
#[derive(Clone, Hash, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct Route {
/// The list of routes taken for a single (potentially-)multi-part payment. The pubkey of the
- /// last RouteHop in each path must be the same.
- /// Each entry represents a list of hops, NOT INCLUDING our own, where the last hop is the
- /// destination. Thus, this must always be at least length one. While the maximum length of any
- /// given path is variable, keeping the length of any path to less than 20 should currently
- /// ensure it is viable.
+ /// last RouteHop in each path must be the same. Each entry represents a list of hops, NOT
+ /// INCLUDING our own, where the last hop is the destination. Thus, this must always be at
+ /// least length one. While the maximum length of any given path is variable, keeping the length
+ /// of any path less or equal to 19 should currently ensure it is viable.
pub paths: Vec<Vec<RouteHop>>,
/// The `payment_params` parameter passed to [`find_route`].
/// This is used by `ChannelManager` to track information which may be required for retries,
/// Parameters needed to find a [`Route`].
///
-/// Passed to [`find_route`] and also provided in [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`] for retrying a failed
-/// payment path.
+/// Passed to [`find_route`] and [`build_route_from_hops`], but also provided in
+/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`] for retrying a failed payment path.
///
/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
/// Maximum total CTLV difference we allow for a full payment path.
pub const DEFAULT_MAX_TOTAL_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA: u32 = 1008;
+// The median hop CLTV expiry delta currently seen in the network.
+const MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA: u32 = 40;
+
+// During routing, we only consider paths shorter than our maximum length estimate.
+// In the legacy onion format, the maximum number of hops used to be a fixed value of 20.
+// However, in the TLV onion format, there is no fixed maximum length, but the `hop_payloads`
+// field is always 1300 bytes. As the `tlv_payload` for each hop may vary in length, we have to
+// estimate how many hops the route may have so that it actually fits the `hop_payloads` field.
+//
+// We estimate 3+32 (payload length and HMAC) + 2+8 (amt_to_forward) + 2+4 (outgoing_cltv_value) +
+// 2+8 (short_channel_id) = 61 bytes for each intermediate hop and 3+32
+// (payload length and HMAC) + 2+8 (amt_to_forward) + 2+4 (outgoing_cltv_value) + 2+32+8
+// (payment_secret and total_msat) = 93 bytes for the final hop.
+// Since the length of the potentially included `payment_metadata` is unknown to us, we round
+// down from (1300-93) / 61 = 19.78... to arrive at a conservative estimate of 19.
+const MAX_PATH_LENGTH_ESTIMATE: u8 = 19;
+
/// The recipient of a payment.
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct PaymentParameters {
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, Eq, PartialEq)]
pub struct RouteHint(pub Vec<RouteHintHop>);
-
impl Writeable for RouteHint {
fn write<W: ::util::ser::Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), io::Error> {
(self.0.len() as u64).write(writer)?;
/// All penalties incurred from this hop on the way to the destination, as calculated using
/// channel scoring.
path_penalty_msat: u64,
+ /// The number of hops walked up to this node.
+ path_length_to_node: u8,
}
impl cmp::Ord for RouteGraphNode {
fn cmp(&self, other: &RouteGraphNode) -> cmp::Ordering {
let other_score = cmp::max(other.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, other.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
- .checked_add(other.path_penalty_msat)
- .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ .saturating_add(other.path_penalty_msat);
let self_score = cmp::max(self.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, self.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
- .checked_add(self.path_penalty_msat)
- .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ .saturating_add(self.path_penalty_msat);
other_score.cmp(&self_score).then_with(|| other.node_id.cmp(&self.node_id))
}
}
impl<'a> CandidateRouteHop<'a> {
fn short_channel_id(&self) -> u64 {
match self {
- CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details } => details.short_channel_id.unwrap(),
+ CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details } => details.get_outbound_payment_scid().unwrap(),
CandidateRouteHop::PublicHop { short_channel_id, .. } => *short_channel_id,
CandidateRouteHop::PrivateHop { hint } => hint.short_channel_id,
}
}
}
+ fn htlc_maximum_msat(&self) -> u64 {
+ match self {
+ CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details } => details.next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat,
+ CandidateRouteHop::PublicHop { info, .. } => info.htlc_maximum_msat(),
+ CandidateRouteHop::PrivateHop { hint } => {
+ hint.htlc_maximum_msat.unwrap_or(u64::max_value())
+ },
+ }
+ }
+
fn fees(&self) -> RoutingFees {
match self {
CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { .. } => RoutingFees {
fn effective_capacity(&self) -> EffectiveCapacity {
match self {
CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details } => EffectiveCapacity::ExactLiquidity {
- liquidity_msat: details.outbound_capacity_msat,
+ liquidity_msat: details.next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat,
},
CandidateRouteHop::PublicHop { info, .. } => info.effective_capacity(),
CandidateRouteHop::PrivateHop { .. } => EffectiveCapacity::Infinite,
/// so that we can choose cheaper paths (as per Dijkstra's algorithm).
/// Fee values should be updated only in the context of the whole path, see update_value_and_recompute_fees.
/// These fee values are useful to choose hops as we traverse the graph "payee-to-payer".
-#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
+#[derive(Clone)]
struct PathBuildingHop<'a> {
// Note that this should be dropped in favor of loading it from CandidateRouteHop, but doing so
// is a larger refactor and will require careful performance analysis.
/// decrease as well. Thus, we have to explicitly track which nodes have been processed and
/// avoid processing them again.
was_processed: bool,
- #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, feature = "fuzztarget")))]
+ #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
// In tests, we apply further sanity checks on cases where we skip nodes we already processed
// to ensure it is specifically in cases where the fee has gone down because of a decrease in
// value_contribution_msat, which requires tracking it here. See comments below where it is
value_contribution_msat: u64,
}
+impl<'a> core::fmt::Debug for PathBuildingHop<'a> {
+ fn fmt(&self, f: &mut core::fmt::Formatter) -> Result<(), core::fmt::Error> {
+ let mut debug_struct = f.debug_struct("PathBuildingHop");
+ debug_struct
+ .field("node_id", &self.node_id)
+ .field("short_channel_id", &self.candidate.short_channel_id())
+ .field("total_fee_msat", &self.total_fee_msat)
+ .field("next_hops_fee_msat", &self.next_hops_fee_msat)
+ .field("hop_use_fee_msat", &self.hop_use_fee_msat)
+ .field("total_fee_msat - (next_hops_fee_msat + hop_use_fee_msat)", &(&self.total_fee_msat - (&self.next_hops_fee_msat + &self.hop_use_fee_msat)))
+ .field("path_penalty_msat", &self.path_penalty_msat)
+ .field("path_htlc_minimum_msat", &self.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
+ .field("cltv_expiry_delta", &self.candidate.cltv_expiry_delta());
+ #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
+ let debug_struct = debug_struct
+ .field("value_contribution_msat", &self.value_contribution_msat);
+ debug_struct.finish()
+ }
+}
+
// Instantiated with a list of hops with correct data in them collected during path finding,
// an instance of this struct should be further modified only via given methods.
#[derive(Clone)]
self.hops.last().unwrap().0.fee_msat
}
+ fn get_path_penalty_msat(&self) -> u64 {
+ self.hops.first().map(|h| h.0.path_penalty_msat).unwrap_or(u64::max_value())
+ }
+
fn get_total_fee_paid_msat(&self) -> u64 {
if self.hops.len() < 1 {
return 0;
return result;
}
+ fn get_cost_msat(&self) -> u64 {
+ self.get_total_fee_paid_msat().saturating_add(self.get_path_penalty_msat())
+ }
+
// If the amount transferred by the path is updated, the fees should be adjusted. Any other way
// to change fees may result in an inconsistency.
//
}
}
+/// The default `features` we assume for a node in a route, when no `features` are known about that
+/// specific node.
+///
+/// Default features are:
+/// * variable_length_onion_optional
+fn default_node_features() -> NodeFeatures {
+ let mut features = NodeFeatures::empty();
+ features.set_variable_length_onion_optional();
+ features
+}
+
/// Finds a route from us (payer) to the given target node (payee).
///
/// If the payee provided features in their invoice, they should be provided via `params.payee`.
/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
pub fn find_route<L: Deref, S: Score>(
our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, route_params: &RouteParameters, network: &NetworkGraph,
- first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, logger: L, scorer: &S
+ first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, logger: L, scorer: &S, random_seed_bytes: &[u8; 32]
) -> Result<Route, LightningError>
where L::Target: Logger {
- get_route(
- our_node_pubkey, &route_params.payment_params, network, first_hops, route_params.final_value_msat,
- route_params.final_cltv_expiry_delta, logger, scorer
- )
+ let network_graph = network.read_only();
+ let mut route = get_route(our_node_pubkey, &route_params.payment_params, &network_graph, first_hops,
+ route_params.final_value_msat, route_params.final_cltv_expiry_delta, logger, scorer,
+ random_seed_bytes)?;
+ add_random_cltv_offset(&mut route, &route_params.payment_params, &network_graph, random_seed_bytes);
+ Ok(route)
}
pub(crate) fn get_route<L: Deref, S: Score>(
- our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, payment_params: &PaymentParameters, network: &NetworkGraph,
- first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
- logger: L, scorer: &S
+ our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, payment_params: &PaymentParameters, network_graph: &ReadOnlyNetworkGraph,
+ first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
+ logger: L, scorer: &S, random_seed_bytes: &[u8; 32]
) -> Result<Route, LightningError>
where L::Target: Logger {
let payee_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&payment_params.payee_pubkey);
}
}
}
+ if payment_params.max_total_cltv_expiry_delta <= final_cltv_expiry_delta {
+ return Err(LightningError{err: "Can't find a route where the maximum total CLTV expiry delta is below the final CLTV expiry.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
+ }
// The general routing idea is the following:
// 1. Fill first/last hops communicated by the caller.
// - OR if we could not construct a new path. Any next attempt will fail too.
// Otherwise, repeat step 2.
// 4. See if we managed to collect paths which aggregately are able to transfer target value
- // (not recommended value). If yes, proceed. If not, fail routing.
- // 5. Randomly combine paths into routes having enough to fulfill the payment. (TODO: knapsack)
- // 6. Of all the found paths, select only those with the lowest total fee.
- // 7. The last path in every selected route is likely to be more than we need.
+ // (not recommended value).
+ // 5. If yes, proceed. If not, fail routing.
+ // 6. Randomly combine paths into routes having enough to fulfill the payment. (TODO: knapsack)
+ // 7. Of all the found paths, select only those with the lowest total fee.
+ // 8. The last path in every selected route is likely to be more than we need.
// Reduce its value-to-transfer and recompute fees.
- // 8. Choose the best route by the lowest total fee.
+ // 9. Choose the best route by the lowest total fee.
// As for the actual search algorithm,
// we do a payee-to-payer pseudo-Dijkstra's sorting by each node's distance from the payee
// to use as the A* heuristic beyond just the cost to get one node further than the current
// one.
- let network_graph = network.read_only();
let network_channels = network_graph.channels();
let network_nodes = network_graph.nodes();
node_info.features.supports_basic_mpp()
} else { false }
} else { false };
- log_trace!(logger, "Searching for a route from payer {} to payee {} {} MPP", our_node_pubkey,
- payment_params.payee_pubkey, if allow_mpp { "with" } else { "without" });
+ log_trace!(logger, "Searching for a route from payer {} to payee {} {} MPP and {} first hops {}overriding the network graph", our_node_pubkey,
+ payment_params.payee_pubkey, if allow_mpp { "with" } else { "without" },
+ first_hops.map(|hops| hops.len()).unwrap_or(0), if first_hops.is_some() { "" } else { "not " });
// Step (1).
// Prepare the data we'll use for payee-to-payer search by
HashMap::with_capacity(if first_hops.is_some() { first_hops.as_ref().unwrap().len() } else { 0 });
if let Some(hops) = first_hops {
for chan in hops {
- if chan.short_channel_id.is_none() {
+ if chan.get_outbound_payment_scid().is_none() {
panic!("first_hops should be filled in with usable channels, not pending ones");
}
if chan.counterparty.node_id == *our_node_pubkey {
// The main heap containing all candidate next-hops sorted by their score (max(A* fee,
// htlc_minimum)). Ideally this would be a heap which allowed cheap score reduction instead of
// adding duplicate entries when we find a better path to a given node.
- let mut targets = BinaryHeap::new();
+ let mut targets: BinaryHeap<RouteGraphNode> = BinaryHeap::new();
// Map from node_id to information about the best current path to that node, including feerate
// information.
- let mut dist = HashMap::with_capacity(network_nodes.len());
+ let mut dist: HashMap<NodeId, PathBuildingHop> = HashMap::with_capacity(network_nodes.len());
// During routing, if we ignore a path due to an htlc_minimum_msat limit, we set this,
// indicating that we may wish to try again with a higher value, potentially paying to meet an
let recommended_value_msat = final_value_msat * ROUTE_CAPACITY_PROVISION_FACTOR as u64;
let mut path_value_msat = final_value_msat;
- // We don't want multiple paths (as per MPP) share liquidity of the same channels.
- // This map allows paths to be aware of the channel use by other paths in the same call.
- // This would help to make a better path finding decisions and not "overbook" channels.
- // It is unaware of the directions (except for `outbound_capacity_msat` in `first_hops`).
- let mut bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat = HashMap::with_capacity(network_nodes.len());
+ // Keep track of how much liquidity has been used in selected channels. Used to determine
+ // if the channel can be used by additional MPP paths or to inform path finding decisions. It is
+ // aware of direction *only* to ensure that the correct htlc_maximum_msat value is used. Hence,
+ // liquidity used in one direction will not offset any used in the opposite direction.
+ let mut used_channel_liquidities: HashMap<(u64, bool), u64> =
+ HashMap::with_capacity(network_nodes.len());
// Keeping track of how much value we already collected across other paths. Helps to decide:
// - how much a new path should be transferring (upper bound);
// - when we want to stop looking for new paths.
let mut already_collected_value_msat = 0;
+ for (_, channels) in first_hop_targets.iter_mut() {
+ // Sort the first_hops channels to the same node(s) in priority order of which channel we'd
+ // most like to use.
+ //
+ // First, if channels are below `recommended_value_msat`, sort them in descending order,
+ // preferring larger channels to avoid splitting the payment into more MPP parts than is
+ // required.
+ //
+ // Second, because simply always sorting in descending order would always use our largest
+ // available outbound capacity, needlessly fragmenting our available channel capacities,
+ // sort channels above `recommended_value_msat` in ascending order, preferring channels
+ // which have enough, but not too much, capacity for the payment.
+ channels.sort_unstable_by(|chan_a, chan_b| {
+ if chan_b.next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat < recommended_value_msat || chan_a.next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat < recommended_value_msat {
+ // Sort in descending order
+ chan_b.next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat.cmp(&chan_a.next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat)
+ } else {
+ // Sort in ascending order
+ chan_a.next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat.cmp(&chan_b.next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat)
+ }
+ });
+ }
+
log_trace!(logger, "Building path from {} (payee) to {} (us/payer) for value {} msat.", payment_params.payee_pubkey, our_node_pubkey, final_value_msat);
macro_rules! add_entry {
// since that value has to be transferred over this channel.
// Returns whether this channel caused an update to `targets`.
( $candidate: expr, $src_node_id: expr, $dest_node_id: expr, $next_hops_fee_msat: expr,
- $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr,
- $next_hops_path_penalty_msat: expr, $next_hops_cltv_delta: expr ) => { {
+ $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr,
+ $next_hops_path_penalty_msat: expr, $next_hops_cltv_delta: expr, $next_hops_path_length: expr ) => { {
// We "return" whether we updated the path at the end, via this:
let mut did_add_update_path_to_src_node = false;
// Channels to self should not be used. This is more of belt-and-suspenders, because in
// - for first and last hops early in get_route
if $src_node_id != $dest_node_id {
let short_channel_id = $candidate.short_channel_id();
- let available_liquidity_msat = bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat
- .entry(short_channel_id)
- .or_insert_with(|| $candidate.effective_capacity().as_msat());
+ let htlc_maximum_msat = $candidate.htlc_maximum_msat();
- // It is tricky to substract $next_hops_fee_msat from available liquidity here.
+ // It is tricky to subtract $next_hops_fee_msat from available liquidity here.
// It may be misleading because we might later choose to reduce the value transferred
// over these channels, and the channel which was insufficient might become sufficient.
// Worst case: we drop a good channel here because it can't cover the high following
// fees caused by one expensive channel, but then this channel could have been used
// if the amount being transferred over this path is lower.
// We do this for now, but this is a subject for removal.
- if let Some(available_value_contribution_msat) = available_liquidity_msat.checked_sub($next_hops_fee_msat) {
+ if let Some(mut available_value_contribution_msat) = htlc_maximum_msat.checked_sub($next_hops_fee_msat) {
+ let used_liquidity_msat = used_channel_liquidities
+ .get(&(short_channel_id, $src_node_id < $dest_node_id))
+ .map_or(0, |used_liquidity_msat| {
+ available_value_contribution_msat = available_value_contribution_msat
+ .saturating_sub(*used_liquidity_msat);
+ *used_liquidity_msat
+ });
// Routing Fragmentation Mitigation heuristic:
//
};
// Verify the liquidity offered by this channel complies to the minimal contribution.
let contributes_sufficient_value = available_value_contribution_msat >= minimal_value_contribution_msat;
+ // Do not consider candidate hops that would exceed the maximum path length.
+ let path_length_to_node = $next_hops_path_length + 1;
+ let doesnt_exceed_max_path_length = path_length_to_node <= MAX_PATH_LENGTH_ESTIMATE;
// Do not consider candidates that exceed the maximum total cltv expiry limit.
- let max_total_cltv_expiry_delta = payment_params.max_total_cltv_expiry_delta;
+ // In order to already account for some of the privacy enhancing random CLTV
+ // expiry delta offset we add on top later, we subtract a rough estimate
+ // (2*MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA) here.
+ let max_total_cltv_expiry_delta = (payment_params.max_total_cltv_expiry_delta - final_cltv_expiry_delta)
+ .checked_sub(2*MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA)
+ .unwrap_or(payment_params.max_total_cltv_expiry_delta - final_cltv_expiry_delta);
let hop_total_cltv_delta = ($next_hops_cltv_delta as u32)
- .checked_add($candidate.cltv_expiry_delta())
- .unwrap_or(u32::max_value());
+ .saturating_add($candidate.cltv_expiry_delta());
let doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit = hop_total_cltv_delta <= max_total_cltv_expiry_delta;
let value_contribution_msat = cmp::min(available_value_contribution_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution);
let over_path_minimum_msat = amount_to_transfer_over_msat >= $candidate.htlc_minimum_msat() &&
amount_to_transfer_over_msat >= $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat;
+ #[allow(unused_comparisons)] // $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat is 0 in some calls so rustc complains
+ let may_overpay_to_meet_path_minimum_msat =
+ ((amount_to_transfer_over_msat < $candidate.htlc_minimum_msat() &&
+ recommended_value_msat > $candidate.htlc_minimum_msat()) ||
+ (amount_to_transfer_over_msat < $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat &&
+ recommended_value_msat > $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat));
+
// If HTLC minimum is larger than the amount we're going to transfer, we shouldn't
- // bother considering this channel.
- // Since we're choosing amount_to_transfer_over_msat as maximum possible, it can
- // be only reduced later (not increased), so this channel should just be skipped
- // as not sufficient.
- if !over_path_minimum_msat && doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit {
+ // bother considering this channel. If retrying with recommended_value_msat may
+ // allow us to hit the HTLC minimum limit, set htlc_minimum_limit so that we go
+ // around again with a higher amount.
+ if contributes_sufficient_value && doesnt_exceed_max_path_length &&
+ doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit && may_overpay_to_meet_path_minimum_msat {
hit_minimum_limit = true;
- } else if contributes_sufficient_value && doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit {
+ } else if contributes_sufficient_value && doesnt_exceed_max_path_length &&
+ doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit && over_path_minimum_msat {
// Note that low contribution here (limited by available_liquidity_msat)
// might violate htlc_minimum_msat on the hops which are next along the
// payment path (upstream to the payee). To avoid that, we recompute
// semi-dummy record just to compute the fees to reach the source node.
// This will affect our decision on selecting short_channel_id
// as a way to reach the $dest_node_id.
- let mut fee_base_msat = u32::max_value();
- let mut fee_proportional_millionths = u32::max_value();
+ let mut fee_base_msat = 0;
+ let mut fee_proportional_millionths = 0;
if let Some(Some(fees)) = network_nodes.get(&$src_node_id).map(|node| node.lowest_inbound_channel_fees) {
fee_base_msat = fees.base_msat;
fee_proportional_millionths = fees.proportional_millionths;
path_htlc_minimum_msat,
path_penalty_msat: u64::max_value(),
was_processed: false,
- #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, feature = "fuzztarget")))]
+ #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
value_contribution_msat,
}
});
#[allow(unused_mut)] // We only use the mut in cfg(test)
let mut should_process = !old_entry.was_processed;
- #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, feature = "fuzztarget")))]
+ #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
{
// In test/fuzzing builds, we do extra checks to make sure the skipping
// of already-seen nodes only happens in cases we expect (see below).
}
}
- let path_penalty_msat = $next_hops_path_penalty_msat.checked_add(
- scorer.channel_penalty_msat(short_channel_id, amount_to_transfer_over_msat, *available_liquidity_msat,
- &$src_node_id, &$dest_node_id)).unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ let channel_usage = ChannelUsage {
+ amount_msat: amount_to_transfer_over_msat,
+ inflight_htlc_msat: used_liquidity_msat,
+ effective_capacity: $candidate.effective_capacity(),
+ };
+ let channel_penalty_msat = scorer.channel_penalty_msat(
+ short_channel_id, &$src_node_id, &$dest_node_id, channel_usage
+ );
+ let path_penalty_msat = $next_hops_path_penalty_msat
+ .saturating_add(channel_penalty_msat);
let new_graph_node = RouteGraphNode {
node_id: $src_node_id,
lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node: total_fee_msat,
value_contribution_msat: value_contribution_msat,
path_htlc_minimum_msat,
path_penalty_msat,
+ path_length_to_node,
};
// Update the way of reaching $src_node_id with the given short_channel_id (from $dest_node_id),
// the fees included in $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, but also
// can't use something that may decrease on future hops.
let old_cost = cmp::max(old_entry.total_fee_msat, old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
- .checked_add(old_entry.path_penalty_msat)
- .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ .saturating_add(old_entry.path_penalty_msat);
let new_cost = cmp::max(total_fee_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat)
- .checked_add(path_penalty_msat)
- .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ .saturating_add(path_penalty_msat);
if !old_entry.was_processed && new_cost < old_cost {
targets.push(new_graph_node);
old_entry.fee_msat = 0; // This value will be later filled with hop_use_fee_msat of the following channel
old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat = path_htlc_minimum_msat;
old_entry.path_penalty_msat = path_penalty_msat;
- #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, feature = "fuzztarget")))]
+ #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
{
old_entry.value_contribution_msat = value_contribution_msat;
}
did_add_update_path_to_src_node = true;
} else if old_entry.was_processed && new_cost < old_cost {
- #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, feature = "fuzztarget")))]
+ #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
{
// If we're skipping processing a node which was previously
// processed even though we found another path to it with a
} }
}
- let empty_node_features = NodeFeatures::empty();
+ let default_node_features = default_node_features();
+
// Find ways (channels with destination) to reach a given node and store them
// in the corresponding data structures (routing graph etc).
// $fee_to_target_msat represents how much it costs to reach to this node from the payee,
// meaning how much will be paid in fees after this node (to the best of our knowledge).
// This data can later be helpful to optimize routing (pay lower fees).
macro_rules! add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node {
- ( $node: expr, $node_id: expr, $fee_to_target_msat: expr, $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat: expr, $next_hops_cltv_delta: expr ) => {
+ ( $node: expr, $node_id: expr, $fee_to_target_msat: expr, $next_hops_value_contribution: expr,
+ $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat: expr,
+ $next_hops_cltv_delta: expr, $next_hops_path_length: expr ) => {
let skip_node = if let Some(elem) = dist.get_mut(&$node_id) {
let was_processed = elem.was_processed;
elem.was_processed = true;
if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&$node_id) {
for details in first_channels {
let candidate = CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details };
- add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, $node_id, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat, $next_hops_cltv_delta);
+ add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, $node_id, $fee_to_target_msat,
+ $next_hops_value_contribution,
+ $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
+ $next_hops_cltv_delta, $next_hops_path_length);
}
}
let features = if let Some(node_info) = $node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
&node_info.features
} else {
- &empty_node_features
+ &default_node_features
};
if !features.requires_unknown_bits() {
info: directed_channel.with_update().unwrap(),
short_channel_id: *chan_id,
};
- add_entry!(candidate, *source, $node_id, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat, $next_hops_cltv_delta);
+ add_entry!(candidate, *source, $node_id,
+ $fee_to_target_msat,
+ $next_hops_value_contribution,
+ $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
+ $next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
+ $next_hops_cltv_delta, $next_hops_path_length);
}
}
}
// TODO: diversify by nodes (so that all paths aren't doomed if one node is offline).
'paths_collection: loop {
- // For every new path, start from scratch, except
- // bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat, which will improve
- // the further iterations of path finding. Also don't erase first_hop_targets.
+ // For every new path, start from scratch, except for used_channel_liquidities, which
+ // helps to avoid reusing previously selected paths in future iterations.
targets.clear();
dist.clear();
hit_minimum_limit = false;
if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&payee_node_id) {
for details in first_channels {
let candidate = CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details };
- let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0);
- log_trace!(logger, "{} direct route to payee via SCID {}", if added { "Added" } else { "Skipped" }, candidate.short_channel_id());
+ let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
+ 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
+ log_trace!(logger, "{} direct route to payee via SCID {}",
+ if added { "Added" } else { "Skipped" }, candidate.short_channel_id());
}
}
// If not, targets.pop() will not even let us enter the loop in step 2.
None => {},
Some(node) => {
- add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0);
+ add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
},
}
let mut aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: u64 = 0;
let mut aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat: u64 = 0;
let mut aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta: u32 = 0;
+ let mut aggregate_next_hops_path_length: u8 = 0;
for (idx, (hop, prev_hop_id)) in hop_iter.zip(prev_hop_iter).enumerate() {
let source = NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id);
short_channel_id: hop.short_channel_id,
})
.unwrap_or_else(|| CandidateRouteHop::PrivateHop { hint: hop });
- let capacity_msat = candidate.effective_capacity().as_msat();
+
+ if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
+ path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
+ aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
+ aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
+ // If this hop was not used then there is no use checking the preceding
+ // hops in the RouteHint. We can break by just searching for a direct
+ // channel between last checked hop and first_hop_targets.
+ hop_used = false;
+ }
+
+ let used_liquidity_msat = used_channel_liquidities
+ .get(&(hop.short_channel_id, source < target)).copied().unwrap_or(0);
+ let channel_usage = ChannelUsage {
+ amount_msat: final_value_msat + aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
+ inflight_htlc_msat: used_liquidity_msat,
+ effective_capacity: candidate.effective_capacity(),
+ };
+ let channel_penalty_msat = scorer.channel_penalty_msat(
+ hop.short_channel_id, &source, &target, channel_usage
+ );
aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat = aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat
- .checked_add(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(hop.short_channel_id, final_value_msat, capacity_msat, &source, &target))
- .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ .saturating_add(channel_penalty_msat);
aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta = aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta
- .checked_add(hop.cltv_expiry_delta as u32)
- .unwrap_or_else(|| u32::max_value());
+ .saturating_add(hop.cltv_expiry_delta as u32);
- if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta) {
- // If this hop was not used then there is no use checking the preceding hops
- // in the RouteHint. We can break by just searching for a direct channel between
- // last checked hop and first_hop_targets
- hop_used = false;
- }
+ aggregate_next_hops_path_length = aggregate_next_hops_path_length
+ .saturating_add(1);
// Searching for a direct channel between last checked hop and first_hop_targets
if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id)) {
for details in first_channels {
let candidate = CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details };
- add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id), aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta);
+ add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
+ aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
+ aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
+ aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
+ aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
}
}
// In the next values of the iterator, the aggregate fees already reflects
// the sum of value sent from payer (final_value_msat) and routing fees
// for the last node in the RouteHint. We need to just add the fees to
- // route through the current node so that the preceeding node (next iteration)
+ // route through the current node so that the preceding node (next iteration)
// can use it.
let hops_fee = compute_fees(aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat + final_value_msat, hop.fees)
.map_or(None, |inc| inc.checked_add(aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat));
if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id)) {
for details in first_channels {
let candidate = CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details };
- add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id), aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta);
+ add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
+ NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
+ aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
+ aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
+ aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
+ aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
+ aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
}
}
}
// Both these cases (and other cases except reaching recommended_value_msat) mean that
// paths_collection will be stopped because found_new_path==false.
// This is not necessarily a routing failure.
- 'path_construction: while let Some(RouteGraphNode { node_id, lowest_fee_to_node, total_cltv_delta, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat, .. }) = targets.pop() {
+ 'path_construction: while let Some(RouteGraphNode { node_id, lowest_fee_to_node, total_cltv_delta, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat, path_length_to_node, .. }) = targets.pop() {
// Since we're going payee-to-payer, hitting our node as a target means we should stop
// traversing the graph and arrange the path out of what we found.
if node_id == our_node_id {
let mut new_entry = dist.remove(&our_node_id).unwrap();
- let mut ordered_hops = vec!((new_entry.clone(), NodeFeatures::empty()));
+ let mut ordered_hops: Vec<(PathBuildingHop, NodeFeatures)> = vec!((new_entry.clone(), default_node_features.clone()));
'path_walk: loop {
let mut features_set = false;
if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id) {
for details in first_channels {
- if details.short_channel_id.unwrap() == ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.candidate.short_channel_id() {
+ if details.get_outbound_payment_scid().unwrap() == ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.candidate.short_channel_id() {
ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = details.counterparty.features.to_context();
features_set = true;
break;
if let Some(node_info) = node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = node_info.features.clone();
} else {
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = NodeFeatures::empty();
+ ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = default_node_features.clone();
}
} else {
- // We should be able to fill in features for everything except the last
- // hop, if the last hop was provided via a BOLT 11 invoice (though we
- // should be able to extend it further as BOLT 11 does have feature
- // flags for the last hop node itself).
- assert!(ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id == payee_node_id);
+ // We can fill in features for everything except hops which were
+ // provided via the invoice we're paying. We could guess based on the
+ // recipient's features but for now we simply avoid guessing at all.
}
}
// so that fees paid for a HTLC forwarding on the current channel are
// associated with the previous channel (where they will be subtracted).
ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.fee_msat = new_entry.hop_use_fee_msat;
- ordered_hops.push((new_entry.clone(), NodeFeatures::empty()));
+ ordered_hops.push((new_entry.clone(), default_node_features.clone()));
}
ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.fee_msat = value_contribution_msat;
ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.hop_use_fee_msat = 0;
- log_trace!(logger, "Found a path back to us from the target with {} hops contributing up to {} msat: {:?}",
- ordered_hops.len(), value_contribution_msat, ordered_hops);
+ log_trace!(logger, "Found a path back to us from the target with {} hops contributing up to {} msat: \n {:#?}",
+ ordered_hops.len(), value_contribution_msat, ordered_hops.iter().map(|h| &(h.0)).collect::<Vec<&PathBuildingHop>>());
let mut payment_path = PaymentPath {hops: ordered_hops};
// Remember that we used these channels so that we don't rely
// on the same liquidity in future paths.
let mut prevented_redundant_path_selection = false;
- for (payment_hop, _) in payment_path.hops.iter() {
- let channel_liquidity_available_msat = bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&payment_hop.candidate.short_channel_id()).unwrap();
- let mut spent_on_hop_msat = value_contribution_msat;
- let next_hops_fee_msat = payment_hop.next_hops_fee_msat;
- spent_on_hop_msat += next_hops_fee_msat;
- if spent_on_hop_msat == *channel_liquidity_available_msat {
+ let prev_hop_iter = core::iter::once(&our_node_id)
+ .chain(payment_path.hops.iter().map(|(hop, _)| &hop.node_id));
+ for (prev_hop, (hop, _)) in prev_hop_iter.zip(payment_path.hops.iter()) {
+ let spent_on_hop_msat = value_contribution_msat + hop.next_hops_fee_msat;
+ let used_liquidity_msat = used_channel_liquidities
+ .entry((hop.candidate.short_channel_id(), *prev_hop < hop.node_id))
+ .and_modify(|used_liquidity_msat| *used_liquidity_msat += spent_on_hop_msat)
+ .or_insert(spent_on_hop_msat);
+ if *used_liquidity_msat == hop.candidate.htlc_maximum_msat() {
// If this path used all of this channel's available liquidity, we know
// this path will not be selected again in the next loop iteration.
prevented_redundant_path_selection = true;
}
- *channel_liquidity_available_msat -= spent_on_hop_msat;
+ debug_assert!(*used_liquidity_msat <= hop.candidate.htlc_maximum_msat());
}
if !prevented_redundant_path_selection {
// If we weren't capped by hitting a liquidity limit on a channel in the path,
// we'll probably end up picking the same path again on the next iteration.
// Decrease the available liquidity of a hop in the middle of the path.
- let victim_scid = payment_path.hops[(payment_path.hops.len() - 1) / 2].0.candidate.short_channel_id();
+ let victim_scid = payment_path.hops[(payment_path.hops.len()) / 2].0.candidate.short_channel_id();
+ let exhausted = u64::max_value();
log_trace!(logger, "Disabling channel {} for future path building iterations to avoid duplicates.", victim_scid);
- let victim_liquidity = bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&victim_scid).unwrap();
- *victim_liquidity = 0;
+ *used_channel_liquidities.entry((victim_scid, false)).or_default() = exhausted;
+ *used_channel_liquidities.entry((victim_scid, true)).or_default() = exhausted;
}
// Track the total amount all our collected paths allow to send so that we:
match network_nodes.get(&node_id) {
None => {},
Some(node) => {
- add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat, total_cltv_delta);
+ add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
+ value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
+ total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
},
}
}
}
// Sort by total fees and take the best paths.
- payment_paths.sort_by_key(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat());
+ payment_paths.sort_unstable_by_key(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat());
if payment_paths.len() > 50 {
payment_paths.truncate(50);
}
// Draw multiple sufficient routes by randomly combining the selected paths.
let mut drawn_routes = Vec::new();
- for i in 0..payment_paths.len() {
+ let mut prng = ChaCha20::new(random_seed_bytes, &[0u8; 12]);
+ let mut random_index_bytes = [0u8; ::core::mem::size_of::<usize>()];
+
+ let num_permutations = payment_paths.len();
+ for _ in 0..num_permutations {
let mut cur_route = Vec::<PaymentPath>::new();
let mut aggregate_route_value_msat = 0;
// Step (6).
- // TODO: real random shuffle
- // Currently just starts with i_th and goes up to i-1_th in a looped way.
- let cur_payment_paths = [&payment_paths[i..], &payment_paths[..i]].concat();
+ // Do a Fisher-Yates shuffle to create a random permutation of the payment paths
+ for cur_index in (1..payment_paths.len()).rev() {
+ prng.process_in_place(&mut random_index_bytes);
+ let random_index = usize::from_be_bytes(random_index_bytes).wrapping_rem(cur_index+1);
+ payment_paths.swap(cur_index, random_index);
+ }
// Step (7).
- for payment_path in cur_payment_paths {
+ for payment_path in &payment_paths {
cur_route.push(payment_path.clone());
aggregate_route_value_msat += payment_path.get_value_msat();
if aggregate_route_value_msat > final_value_msat {
// also makes routing more reliable.
let mut overpaid_value_msat = aggregate_route_value_msat - final_value_msat;
- // First, drop some expensive low-value paths entirely if possible.
- // Sort by value so that we drop many really-low values first, since
- // fewer paths is better: the payment is less likely to fail.
- // TODO: this could also be optimized by also sorting by feerate_per_sat_routed,
- // so that the sender pays less fees overall. And also htlc_minimum_msat.
- cur_route.sort_by_key(|path| path.get_value_msat());
+ // First, we drop some expensive low-value paths entirely if possible, since fewer
+ // paths is better: the payment is less likely to fail. In order to do so, we sort
+ // by value and fall back to total fees paid, i.e., in case of equal values we
+ // prefer lower cost paths.
+ cur_route.sort_unstable_by(|a, b| {
+ a.get_value_msat().cmp(&b.get_value_msat())
+ // Reverse ordering for cost, so we drop higher-cost paths first
+ .then_with(|| b.get_cost_msat().cmp(&a.get_cost_msat()))
+ });
+
// We should make sure that at least 1 path left.
let mut paths_left = cur_route.len();
cur_route.retain(|path| {
assert!(cur_route.len() > 0);
// Step (8).
- // Now, substract the overpaid value from the most-expensive path.
+ // Now, subtract the overpaid value from the most-expensive path.
// TODO: this could also be optimized by also sorting by feerate_per_sat_routed,
// so that the sender pays less fees overall. And also htlc_minimum_msat.
- cur_route.sort_by_key(|path| { path.hops.iter().map(|hop| hop.0.candidate.fees().proportional_millionths as u64).sum::<u64>() });
+ cur_route.sort_unstable_by_key(|path| { path.hops.iter().map(|hop| hop.0.candidate.fees().proportional_millionths as u64).sum::<u64>() });
let expensive_payment_path = cur_route.first_mut().unwrap();
- // We already dropped all the small channels above, meaning all the
- // remaining channels are larger than remaining overpaid_value_msat.
+
+ // We already dropped all the small value paths above, meaning all the
+ // remaining paths are larger than remaining overpaid_value_msat.
// Thus, this can't be negative.
let expensive_path_new_value_msat = expensive_payment_path.get_value_msat() - overpaid_value_msat;
expensive_payment_path.update_value_and_recompute_fees(expensive_path_new_value_msat);
}
// Step (9).
- // Select the best route by lowest total fee.
- drawn_routes.sort_by_key(|paths| paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat()).sum::<u64>());
+ // Select the best route by lowest total cost.
+ drawn_routes.sort_unstable_by_key(|paths| paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_cost_msat()).sum::<u64>());
let mut selected_paths = Vec::<Vec<Result<RouteHop, LightningError>>>::new();
for payment_path in drawn_routes.first().unwrap() {
let mut path = payment_path.hops.iter().map(|(payment_hop, node_features)| {
Ok(route)
}
+// When an adversarial intermediary node observes a payment, it may be able to infer its
+// destination, if the remaining CLTV expiry delta exactly matches a feasible path in the network
+// graph. In order to improve privacy, this method obfuscates the CLTV expiry deltas along the
+// payment path by adding a randomized 'shadow route' offset to the final hop.
+fn add_random_cltv_offset(route: &mut Route, payment_params: &PaymentParameters,
+ network_graph: &ReadOnlyNetworkGraph, random_seed_bytes: &[u8; 32]
+) {
+ let network_channels = network_graph.channels();
+ let network_nodes = network_graph.nodes();
+
+ for path in route.paths.iter_mut() {
+ let mut shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset: u32 = 0;
+
+ // Remember the last three nodes of the random walk and avoid looping back on them.
+ // Init with the last three nodes from the actual path, if possible.
+ let mut nodes_to_avoid: [NodeId; 3] = [NodeId::from_pubkey(&path.last().unwrap().pubkey),
+ NodeId::from_pubkey(&path.get(path.len().saturating_sub(2)).unwrap().pubkey),
+ NodeId::from_pubkey(&path.get(path.len().saturating_sub(3)).unwrap().pubkey)];
+
+ // Choose the last publicly known node as the starting point for the random walk.
+ let mut cur_hop: Option<NodeId> = None;
+ let mut path_nonce = [0u8; 12];
+ if let Some(starting_hop) = path.iter().rev()
+ .find(|h| network_nodes.contains_key(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&h.pubkey))) {
+ cur_hop = Some(NodeId::from_pubkey(&starting_hop.pubkey));
+ path_nonce.copy_from_slice(&cur_hop.unwrap().as_slice()[..12]);
+ }
+
+ // Init PRNG with the path-dependant nonce, which is static for private paths.
+ let mut prng = ChaCha20::new(random_seed_bytes, &path_nonce);
+ let mut random_path_bytes = [0u8; ::core::mem::size_of::<usize>()];
+
+ // Pick a random path length in [1 .. 3]
+ prng.process_in_place(&mut random_path_bytes);
+ let random_walk_length = usize::from_be_bytes(random_path_bytes).wrapping_rem(3).wrapping_add(1);
+
+ for random_hop in 0..random_walk_length {
+ // If we don't find a suitable offset in the public network graph, we default to
+ // MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA.
+ let mut random_hop_offset = MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA;
+
+ if let Some(cur_node_id) = cur_hop {
+ if let Some(cur_node) = network_nodes.get(&cur_node_id) {
+ // Randomly choose the next unvisited hop.
+ prng.process_in_place(&mut random_path_bytes);
+ if let Some(random_channel) = usize::from_be_bytes(random_path_bytes)
+ .checked_rem(cur_node.channels.len())
+ .and_then(|index| cur_node.channels.get(index))
+ .and_then(|id| network_channels.get(id)) {
+ random_channel.as_directed_from(&cur_node_id).map(|(dir_info, next_id)| {
+ if !nodes_to_avoid.iter().any(|x| x == next_id) {
+ nodes_to_avoid[random_hop] = *next_id;
+ dir_info.direction().map(|channel_update_info| {
+ random_hop_offset = channel_update_info.cltv_expiry_delta.into();
+ cur_hop = Some(*next_id);
+ });
+ }
+ });
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset = shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset
+ .checked_add(random_hop_offset)
+ .unwrap_or(shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset);
+ }
+
+ // Limit the total offset to reduce the worst-case locked liquidity timevalue
+ const MAX_SHADOW_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA_OFFSET: u32 = 3*144;
+ shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset = cmp::min(shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset, MAX_SHADOW_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA_OFFSET);
+
+ // Limit the offset so we never exceed the max_total_cltv_expiry_delta. To improve plausibility,
+ // we choose the limit to be the largest possible multiple of MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA.
+ let path_total_cltv_expiry_delta: u32 = path.iter().map(|h| h.cltv_expiry_delta).sum();
+ let mut max_path_offset = payment_params.max_total_cltv_expiry_delta - path_total_cltv_expiry_delta;
+ max_path_offset = cmp::max(
+ max_path_offset - (max_path_offset % MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA),
+ max_path_offset % MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA);
+ shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset = cmp::min(shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset, max_path_offset);
+
+ // Add 'shadow' CLTV offset to the final hop
+ if let Some(last_hop) = path.last_mut() {
+ last_hop.cltv_expiry_delta = last_hop.cltv_expiry_delta
+ .checked_add(shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset).unwrap_or(last_hop.cltv_expiry_delta);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/// Construct a route from us (payer) to the target node (payee) via the given hops (which should
+/// exclude the payer, but include the payee). This may be useful, e.g., for probing the chosen path.
+///
+/// Re-uses logic from `find_route`, so the restrictions described there also apply here.
+pub fn build_route_from_hops<L: Deref>(
+ our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, hops: &[PublicKey], route_params: &RouteParameters, network: &NetworkGraph,
+ logger: L, random_seed_bytes: &[u8; 32]
+) -> Result<Route, LightningError>
+where L::Target: Logger {
+ let network_graph = network.read_only();
+ let mut route = build_route_from_hops_internal(
+ our_node_pubkey, hops, &route_params.payment_params, &network_graph,
+ route_params.final_value_msat, route_params.final_cltv_expiry_delta, logger, random_seed_bytes)?;
+ add_random_cltv_offset(&mut route, &route_params.payment_params, &network_graph, random_seed_bytes);
+ Ok(route)
+}
+
+fn build_route_from_hops_internal<L: Deref>(
+ our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, hops: &[PublicKey], payment_params: &PaymentParameters,
+ network_graph: &ReadOnlyNetworkGraph, final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
+ logger: L, random_seed_bytes: &[u8; 32]
+) -> Result<Route, LightningError> where L::Target: Logger {
+
+ struct HopScorer {
+ our_node_id: NodeId,
+ hop_ids: [Option<NodeId>; MAX_PATH_LENGTH_ESTIMATE as usize],
+ }
+
+ impl Score for HopScorer {
+ fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, _short_channel_id: u64, source: &NodeId, target: &NodeId,
+ _usage: ChannelUsage) -> u64
+ {
+ let mut cur_id = self.our_node_id;
+ for i in 0..self.hop_ids.len() {
+ if let Some(next_id) = self.hop_ids[i] {
+ if cur_id == *source && next_id == *target {
+ return 0;
+ }
+ cur_id = next_id;
+ } else {
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ u64::max_value()
+ }
+
+ fn payment_path_failed(&mut self, _path: &[&RouteHop], _short_channel_id: u64) {}
+
+ fn payment_path_successful(&mut self, _path: &[&RouteHop]) {}
+ }
+
+ impl<'a> Writeable for HopScorer {
+ #[inline]
+ fn write<W: Writer>(&self, _w: &mut W) -> Result<(), io::Error> {
+ unreachable!();
+ }
+ }
+
+ if hops.len() > MAX_PATH_LENGTH_ESTIMATE.into() {
+ return Err(LightningError{err: "Cannot build a route exceeding the maximum path length.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
+ }
+
+ let our_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(our_node_pubkey);
+ let mut hop_ids = [None; MAX_PATH_LENGTH_ESTIMATE as usize];
+ for i in 0..hops.len() {
+ hop_ids[i] = Some(NodeId::from_pubkey(&hops[i]));
+ }
+
+ let scorer = HopScorer { our_node_id, hop_ids };
+
+ get_route(our_node_pubkey, payment_params, network_graph, None, final_value_msat,
+ final_cltv_expiry_delta, logger, &scorer, random_seed_bytes)
+}
+
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
- use routing::scoring::{ProbabilisticScorer, ProbabilisticScoringParameters, Score};
use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NetGraphMsgHandler, NodeId};
- use routing::router::{get_route, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteHop, RoutingFees};
+ use routing::router::{get_route, build_route_from_hops_internal, add_random_cltv_offset, default_node_features,
+ PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteHop, RoutingFees,
+ DEFAULT_MAX_TOTAL_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA, MAX_PATH_LENGTH_ESTIMATE};
+ use routing::scoring::{ChannelUsage, Score};
use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
+ use chain::keysinterface::KeysInterface;
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs::{ErrorAction, LightningError, OptionalField, UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, ChannelAnnouncement, RoutingMessageHandler,
- NodeAnnouncement, UnsignedNodeAnnouncement, ChannelUpdate, UnsignedChannelUpdate};
+ NodeAnnouncement, UnsignedNodeAnnouncement, ChannelUpdate, UnsignedChannelUpdate};
use ln::channelmanager;
use util::test_utils;
+ use util::chacha20::ChaCha20;
use util::ser::Writeable;
#[cfg(c_bindings)]
use util::ser::Writer;
use hex;
- use bitcoin::secp256k1::key::{PublicKey,SecretKey};
+ use bitcoin::secp256k1::{PublicKey,SecretKey};
use bitcoin::secp256k1::{Secp256k1, All};
use prelude::*;
node_id,
unspendable_punishment_reserve: 0,
forwarding_info: None,
+ outbound_htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ outbound_htlc_maximum_msat: None,
},
funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }),
+ channel_type: None,
short_channel_id,
+ outbound_scid_alias: None,
+ inbound_scid_alias: None,
channel_value_satoshis: 0,
user_channel_id: 0,
balance_msat: 0,
outbound_capacity_msat,
+ next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat: outbound_capacity_msat,
inbound_capacity_msat: 42,
unspendable_punishment_reserve: None,
confirmations_required: None,
force_close_spend_delay: None,
- is_outbound: true, is_funding_locked: true,
+ is_outbound: true, is_channel_ready: true,
is_usable: true, is_public: true,
+ inbound_htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ inbound_htlc_maximum_msat: None,
}
}
let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
let valid_announcement = ChannelAnnouncement {
- node_signature_1: secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, node_1_privkey),
- node_signature_2: secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, node_2_privkey),
- bitcoin_signature_1: secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, node_1_privkey),
- bitcoin_signature_2: secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, node_2_privkey),
+ node_signature_1: secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa(&msghash, node_1_privkey),
+ node_signature_2: secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa(&msghash, node_2_privkey),
+ bitcoin_signature_1: secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa(&msghash, node_1_privkey),
+ bitcoin_signature_2: secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa(&msghash, node_2_privkey),
contents: unsigned_announcement.clone(),
};
match net_graph_msg_handler.handle_channel_announcement(&valid_announcement) {
) {
let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&update.encode()[..])[..]);
let valid_channel_update = ChannelUpdate {
- signature: secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, node_privkey),
+ signature: secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa(&msghash, node_privkey),
contents: update.clone()
};
};
let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
let valid_announcement = NodeAnnouncement {
- signature: secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, node_privkey),
+ signature: secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa(&msghash, node_privkey),
contents: unsigned_announcement.clone()
};
}
fn get_nodes(secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>) -> (SecretKey, PublicKey, Vec<SecretKey>, Vec<PublicKey>) {
- let privkeys: Vec<SecretKey> = (2..10).map(|i| {
- SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02}", i).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap()
+ let privkeys: Vec<SecretKey> = (2..22).map(|i| {
+ SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02x}", i).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap()
}).collect();
let pubkeys = privkeys.iter().map(|secret| PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, secret)).collect();
}
}
+ fn build_line_graph() -> (
+ Secp256k1<All>, sync::Arc<NetworkGraph>, NetGraphMsgHandler<sync::Arc<NetworkGraph>,
+ sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, sync::Arc<crate::util::test_utils::TestLogger>>,
+ sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, sync::Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>,
+ ) {
+ let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
+ let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
+ let chain_monitor = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet));
+ let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()));
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Arc::clone(&network_graph), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
+
+ // Build network from our_id to node 19:
+ // our_id -1(1)2- node0 -1(2)2- node1 - ... - node19
+ let (our_privkey, _, privkeys, _) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+
+ for (idx, (cur_privkey, next_privkey)) in core::iter::once(&our_privkey)
+ .chain(privkeys.iter()).zip(privkeys.iter()).enumerate() {
+ let cur_short_channel_id = (idx as u64) + 1;
+ add_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &cur_privkey, &next_privkey,
+ ChannelFeatures::from_le_bytes(id_to_feature_flags(1)), cur_short_channel_id);
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &cur_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: cur_short_channel_id,
+ timestamp: idx as u32,
+ flags: 0,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
+ fee_base_msat: 0,
+ fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &next_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: cur_short_channel_id,
+ timestamp: (idx as u32)+1,
+ flags: 1,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
+ fee_base_msat: 0,
+ fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+ add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, next_privkey,
+ NodeFeatures::from_le_bytes(id_to_feature_flags(1)), 0);
+ }
+
+ (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger)
+ }
+
fn build_graph() -> (
Secp256k1<All>,
sync::Arc<NetworkGraph>,
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
// Simple route to 2 via 1
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send a payment of 0 msat");
} else { panic!(); }
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
// Simple route to 2 via 1
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(2), our_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 100000)];
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) =
+ get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "First hop cannot have our_node_pubkey as a destination.");
} else { panic!(); }
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
}
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
// Simple route to 2 via 1
});
// Not possible to send 199_999_999, because the minimum on channel=2 is 200_000_000.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
});
// A payment above the minimum should pass
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
}
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
// A route to node#2 via two paths.
// One path allows transferring 35-40 sats, another one also allows 35-40 sats.
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
// Overpay fees to hit htlc_minimum_msat.
let overpaid_fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat + route.paths[1][0].fee_msat;
// TODO: this could be better balanced to overpay 10k and not 15k.
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
// Fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it allows us to save fee.
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 12);
let fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat;
assert_eq!(fees, 5_000);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
// Not fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it requires paying more than fee on
// the other channel.
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
// // Disable channels 4 and 12 by flags=2
update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[1], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
});
// If all the channels require some features we don't understand, route should fail
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
// Disable nodes 1, 2, and 8 by requiring unknown feature bits
- let unknown_features = NodeFeatures::known().set_unknown_feature_required();
+ let mut unknown_features = NodeFeatures::known();
+ unknown_features.set_unknown_feature_required();
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[0], unknown_features.clone(), 1);
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[1], unknown_features.clone(), 1);
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[7], unknown_features.clone(), 1);
// If all nodes require some features we don't understand, route should fail
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
// Route to 1 via 2 and 3 because our channel to 1 is disabled
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0]);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
// Simple test across 2, 3, 5, and 4 via a last_hop channel
// Tests the behaviour when the RouteHint contains a suboptimal hop.
invalid_last_hops.push(invalid_last_hop);
{
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(invalid_last_hops);
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Route hint cannot have the payee as the source.");
} else { panic!(); }
}
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes));
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
}
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(empty_last_hop(&nodes));
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
// Test handling of an empty RouteHint passed in Invoice.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
}
- fn multi_hint_last_hops(nodes: &Vec<PublicKey>) -> Vec<RouteHint> {
+ /// Builds a trivial last-hop hint that passes through the two nodes given, with channel 0xff00
+ /// and 0xff01.
+ fn multi_hop_last_hops_hint(hint_hops: [PublicKey; 2]) -> Vec<RouteHint> {
let zero_fees = RoutingFees {
base_msat: 0,
proportional_millionths: 0,
};
vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
- src_node_id: nodes[2],
- short_channel_id: 5,
+ src_node_id: hint_hops[0],
+ short_channel_id: 0xff00,
fees: RoutingFees {
base_msat: 100,
proportional_millionths: 0,
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
htlc_maximum_msat: None,
}, RouteHintHop {
- src_node_id: nodes[3],
- short_channel_id: 8,
+ src_node_id: hint_hops[1],
+ short_channel_id: 0xff01,
fees: zero_fees,
cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 4) | 1,
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
htlc_maximum_msat: None,
- }]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
- src_node_id: nodes[5],
- short_channel_id: 10,
- fees: zero_fees,
- cltv_expiry_delta: (10 << 4) | 1,
- htlc_minimum_msat: None,
- htlc_maximum_msat: None,
}])]
}
fn multi_hint_last_hops_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(multi_hint_last_hops(&nodes));
+ let last_hops = multi_hop_last_hops_hint([nodes[2], nodes[3]]);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone());
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
- // Test through channels 2, 3, 5, 8.
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
+ // Test through channels 2, 3, 0xff00, 0xff01.
// Test shows that multiple hop hints are considered.
// Disabling channels 6 & 7 by flags=2
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].pubkey, nodes[3]);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, 5);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[0].short_channel_id);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 0);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].cltv_expiry_delta, 129);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].pubkey, nodes[6]);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, 8);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[1].short_channel_id);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn private_multi_hint_last_hops_test() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+
+ let non_announced_privkey = SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02x}", 0xf0).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap();
+ let non_announced_pubkey = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &non_announced_privkey);
+
+ let last_hops = multi_hop_last_hops_hint([nodes[2], non_announced_pubkey]);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ // Test through channels 2, 3, 0xff00, 0xff01.
+ // Test shows that multiple hop hints are considered.
+
+ // Disabling channels 6 & 7 by flags=2
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[2], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 6,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 2, // to disable
+ cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
+ fee_base_msat: 0,
+ fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[2], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 7,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 2, // to disable
+ cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
+ fee_base_msat: 0,
+ fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &[42u8; 32]).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 2);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 200);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, 65);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, nodes[2]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 4);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 81);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].pubkey, non_announced_pubkey);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[0].short_channel_id);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].cltv_expiry_delta, 129);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].pubkey, nodes[6]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[1].short_channel_id);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
}
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_with_public_channel(&nodes));
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
// This test shows that public routes can be present in the invoice
// which would be handled in the same manner.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
}
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
// Simple test with outbound channel to 4 to test that last_hops and first_hops connect
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[3].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
let mut last_hops = last_hops(&nodes);
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone());
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[3]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 8);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 100);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
last_hops[0].0[0].fees.base_msat = 1000;
// Revert to via 6 as the fee on 8 goes up
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, 10);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
// ...but still use 8 for larger payments as 6 has a variable feerate
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 2000);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
}
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(target_node_id).with_route_hints(vec![last_hops]);
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), middle_node_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), outbound_capacity_msat)];
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
- get_route(&source_node_id, &payment_params, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), route_val, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer)
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
+ get_route(&source_node_id, &payment_params, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()).read_only(),
+ Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), route_val, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes)
}
#[test]
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 8);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 1000000);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &[0; 0]); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &[0; 0]); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
}
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, mut net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We will use a simple single-path route from
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
assert_eq!(path.last().unwrap().fee_msat, 250_000_000);
}
- // Check that setting outbound_capacity_msat in first_hops limits the channels.
+ // Check that setting next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat in first_hops limits the channels.
// Disable channel #1 and use another first hop.
update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- // Now, limit the first_hop by the outbound_capacity_msat of 200_000 sats.
+ // Now, limit the first_hop by the next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat of 200_000 sats.
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[0].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 200_000_000)];
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// Path via {node7, node2, node4} is channels {12, 13, 6, 11}.
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 49 sats (just a bit below the capacity).
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
// Path via node0 is channels {1, 3}. Limit them to 100 and 50 sats (total limit 50).
});
{
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 250 sats (just a bit below the capacity).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 300 sats (exact amount we can route).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths, 100 sats each.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// This test checks that if we have two cheaper paths and one more expensive path,
{
// Now, attempt to route 180 sats.
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 2 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_value_transferred_msat = 0;
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 2 paths:
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 200 sats (exact amount we can route).
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(PublicKey::from_slice(&[02; 33]).unwrap()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known())
.with_route_hints(vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
src_node_id: nodes[2],
// Get a route for 100 sats and check that we found the MPP route no problem and didn't
// overpay at all.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
// Paths are somewhat randomly ordered, but:
// * the first is channel 2 (1 msat fee) -> channel 4 -> channel 42
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 125 sats (just a bit below the capacity of 3 channels).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route without the last small cheap channel
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
// "previous hop" being set to node 3, creating a loop in the path.
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
- let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()));
- let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Arc::clone(&network_graph), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
+ let network = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()));
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Arc::clone(&network), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]);
add_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, &privkeys[1], ChannelFeatures::from_le_bytes(id_to_feature_flags(6)), 6);
{
// Now ensure the route flows simply over nodes 1 and 4 to 6.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network.read_only(), None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3);
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
// We modify the graph to set the htlc_maximum of channel 2 to below the value we wish to
{
// Now, attempt to route 90 sats, which is exactly 90 sats at the last hop, plus the
// 200% fee charged channel 13 in the 1-to-2 direction.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We modify the graph to set the htlc_minimum of channel 2 and 4 as needed - channel 2
// Now, attempt to route 90 sats, hitting the htlc_minimum on channel 4, but
// overshooting the htlc_maximum on channel 2. Thus, we should pick the (absurdly
// expensive) channels 12-13 path.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
let network_graph = NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash());
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
{
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&[
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&[
&get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 200_000),
&get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 10_000),
- ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 100_000);
}
{
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&[
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&[
&get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
&get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
- ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[1].len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].short_channel_id, 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].fee_msat, 50_000);
}
+
+ {
+ // If we have a bunch of outbound channels to the same node, where most are not
+ // sufficient to pay the full payment, but one is, we should default to just using the
+ // one single channel that has sufficient balance, avoiding MPP.
+ //
+ // If we have several options above the 3xpayment value threshold, we should pick the
+ // smallest of them, avoiding further fragmenting our available outbound balance to
+ // this node.
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&[
+ &get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
+ &get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
+ &get_channel_details(Some(5), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
+ &get_channel_details(Some(6), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 300_000),
+ &get_channel_details(Some(7), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
+ &get_channel_details(Some(8), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
+ &get_channel_details(Some(9), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
+ &get_channel_details(Some(4), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 1_000_000),
+ ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 1);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[0]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 6);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 100_000);
+ }
}
#[test]
// Without penalizing each hop 100 msats, a longer path with lower fees is chosen.
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let route = get_route(
- &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
- Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
// from nodes[2] rather than channel 6, 11, and 8, even though the longer path is cheaper.
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(100);
let route = get_route(
- &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
- Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
fn write<W: Writer>(&self, _w: &mut W) -> Result<(), ::io::Error> { unimplemented!() }
}
impl Score for BadChannelScorer {
- fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, short_channel_id: u64, _send_amt: u64, _capacity_msat: u64, _source: &NodeId, _target: &NodeId) -> u64 {
+ fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, short_channel_id: u64, _: &NodeId, _: &NodeId, _: ChannelUsage) -> u64 {
if short_channel_id == self.short_channel_id { u64::max_value() } else { 0 }
}
}
impl Score for BadNodeScorer {
- fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, _short_channel_id: u64, _send_amt: u64, _capacity_msat: u64, _source: &NodeId, target: &NodeId) -> u64 {
+ fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, _: u64, _: &NodeId, target: &NodeId, _: ChannelUsage) -> u64 {
if *target == self.node_id { u64::max_value() } else { 0 }
}
#[test]
fn avoids_routing_through_bad_channels_and_nodes() {
- let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes));
+ let network_graph = network.read_only();
// A path to nodes[6] exists when no penalties are applied to any channel.
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let route = get_route(
&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
- Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
let scorer = BadChannelScorer { short_channel_id: 6 };
let route = get_route(
&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
- Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
let scorer = BadNodeScorer { node_id: NodeId::from_pubkey(&nodes[2]) };
match get_route(
&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
- Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes
) {
Err(LightningError { err, .. } ) => {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
#[test]
fn limits_total_cltv_delta() {
- let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let network_graph = network.read_only();
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
let feasible_max_total_cltv_delta = 1008;
let feasible_payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes))
.with_max_total_cltv_expiry_delta(feasible_max_total_cltv_delta);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &feasible_payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &feasible_payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 0, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
assert_ne!(path.len(), 0);
let fail_max_total_cltv_delta = 23;
let fail_payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes))
.with_max_total_cltv_expiry_delta(fail_max_total_cltv_delta);
- match get_route(&our_id, &fail_payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer)
+ match get_route(&our_id, &fail_payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 0, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes)
{
Err(LightningError { err, .. } ) => {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
}
}
+ #[test]
+ fn limits_path_length() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network, _, _, logger) = build_line_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let network_graph = network.read_only();
+
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
+
+ // First check we can actually create a long route on this graph.
+ let feasible_payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[18]);
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &feasible_payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 0,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
+ let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
+ assert!(path.len() == MAX_PATH_LENGTH_ESTIMATE.into());
+
+ // But we can't create a path surpassing the MAX_PATH_LENGTH_ESTIMATE limit.
+ let fail_payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[19]);
+ match get_route(&our_id, &fail_payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 0,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes)
+ {
+ Err(LightningError { err, .. } ) => {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
+ },
+ Ok(_) => panic!("Expected error"),
+ }
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn adds_and_limits_cltv_offset() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes));
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
+
+ let cltv_expiry_deltas_before = route.paths[0].iter().map(|h| h.cltv_expiry_delta).collect::<Vec<u32>>();
+
+ // Check whether the offset added to the last hop by default is in [1 .. DEFAULT_MAX_TOTAL_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA]
+ let mut route_default = route.clone();
+ add_random_cltv_offset(&mut route_default, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), &random_seed_bytes);
+ let cltv_expiry_deltas_default = route_default.paths[0].iter().map(|h| h.cltv_expiry_delta).collect::<Vec<u32>>();
+ assert_eq!(cltv_expiry_deltas_before.split_last().unwrap().1, cltv_expiry_deltas_default.split_last().unwrap().1);
+ assert!(cltv_expiry_deltas_default.last() > cltv_expiry_deltas_before.last());
+ assert!(cltv_expiry_deltas_default.last().unwrap() <= &DEFAULT_MAX_TOTAL_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA);
+
+ // Check that no offset is added when we restrict the max_total_cltv_expiry_delta
+ let mut route_limited = route.clone();
+ let limited_max_total_cltv_expiry_delta = cltv_expiry_deltas_before.iter().sum();
+ let limited_payment_params = payment_params.with_max_total_cltv_expiry_delta(limited_max_total_cltv_expiry_delta);
+ add_random_cltv_offset(&mut route_limited, &limited_payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), &random_seed_bytes);
+ let cltv_expiry_deltas_limited = route_limited.paths[0].iter().map(|h| h.cltv_expiry_delta).collect::<Vec<u32>>();
+ assert_eq!(cltv_expiry_deltas_before, cltv_expiry_deltas_limited);
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn adds_plausible_cltv_offset() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let network_graph = network.read_only();
+ let network_nodes = network_graph.nodes();
+ let network_channels = network_graph.channels();
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]);
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[4u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
+
+ let mut route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 0,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
+ add_random_cltv_offset(&mut route, &payment_params, &network_graph, &random_seed_bytes);
+
+ let mut path_plausibility = vec![];
+
+ for p in route.paths {
+ // 1. Select random observation point
+ let mut prng = ChaCha20::new(&random_seed_bytes, &[0u8; 12]);
+ let mut random_bytes = [0u8; ::core::mem::size_of::<usize>()];
+
+ prng.process_in_place(&mut random_bytes);
+ let random_path_index = usize::from_be_bytes(random_bytes).wrapping_rem(p.len());
+ let observation_point = NodeId::from_pubkey(&p.get(random_path_index).unwrap().pubkey);
+
+ // 2. Calculate what CLTV expiry delta we would observe there
+ let observed_cltv_expiry_delta: u32 = p[random_path_index..].iter().map(|h| h.cltv_expiry_delta).sum();
+
+ // 3. Starting from the observation point, find candidate paths
+ let mut candidates: VecDeque<(NodeId, Vec<u32>)> = VecDeque::new();
+ candidates.push_back((observation_point, vec![]));
+
+ let mut found_plausible_candidate = false;
+
+ 'candidate_loop: while let Some((cur_node_id, cur_path_cltv_deltas)) = candidates.pop_front() {
+ if let Some(remaining) = observed_cltv_expiry_delta.checked_sub(cur_path_cltv_deltas.iter().sum::<u32>()) {
+ if remaining == 0 || remaining.wrapping_rem(40) == 0 || remaining.wrapping_rem(144) == 0 {
+ found_plausible_candidate = true;
+ break 'candidate_loop;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if let Some(cur_node) = network_nodes.get(&cur_node_id) {
+ for channel_id in &cur_node.channels {
+ if let Some(channel_info) = network_channels.get(&channel_id) {
+ if let Some((dir_info, next_id)) = channel_info.as_directed_from(&cur_node_id) {
+ if let Some(channel_update_info) = dir_info.direction() {
+ let next_cltv_expiry_delta = channel_update_info.cltv_expiry_delta as u32;
+ if cur_path_cltv_deltas.iter().sum::<u32>()
+ .saturating_add(next_cltv_expiry_delta) <= observed_cltv_expiry_delta {
+ let mut new_path_cltv_deltas = cur_path_cltv_deltas.clone();
+ new_path_cltv_deltas.push(next_cltv_expiry_delta);
+ candidates.push_back((*next_id, new_path_cltv_deltas));
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ path_plausibility.push(found_plausible_candidate);
+ }
+ assert!(path_plausibility.iter().all(|x| *x));
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn builds_correct_path_from_hops() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let network_graph = network.read_only();
+
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
+
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]);
+ let hops = [nodes[1], nodes[2], nodes[4], nodes[3]];
+ let route = build_route_from_hops_internal(&our_id, &hops, &payment_params,
+ &network_graph, 100, 0, Arc::clone(&logger), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
+ let route_hop_pubkeys = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.pubkey).collect::<Vec<_>>();
+ assert_eq!(hops.len(), route.paths[0].len());
+ for (idx, hop_pubkey) in hops.iter().enumerate() {
+ assert!(*hop_pubkey == route_hop_pubkeys[idx]);
+ }
+ }
+
#[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))]
pub(super) fn random_init_seed() -> u64 {
// Because the default HashMap in std pulls OS randomness, we can use it as a (bad) RNG.
#[test]
#[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))]
fn generate_routes() {
+ use routing::scoring::{ProbabilisticScorer, ProbabilisticScoringParameters};
+
let mut d = match super::test_utils::get_route_file() {
Ok(f) => f,
Err(e) => {
},
};
let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap();
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
// First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
let mut seed = random_init_seed() as usize;
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(dst);
let amt = seed as u64 % 200_000_000;
let params = ProbabilisticScoringParameters::default();
- let scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &graph);
- if get_route(src, &payment_params, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() {
+ let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+ let scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &graph, &logger);
+ if get_route(src, &payment_params, &graph.read_only(), None, amt, 42, &logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).is_ok() {
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
}
#[test]
#[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))]
fn generate_routes_mpp() {
+ use routing::scoring::{ProbabilisticScorer, ProbabilisticScoringParameters};
+
let mut d = match super::test_utils::get_route_file() {
Ok(f) => f,
Err(e) => {
},
};
let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap();
+ let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
// First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
let mut seed = random_init_seed() as usize;
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
let amt = seed as u64 % 200_000_000;
let params = ProbabilisticScoringParameters::default();
- let scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &graph);
- if get_route(src, &payment_params, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() {
+ let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+ let scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &graph, &logger);
+ if get_route(src, &payment_params, &graph.read_only(), None, amt, 42, &logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).is_ok() {
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
}
use bitcoin::hashes::Hash;
use bitcoin::secp256k1::{PublicKey, Secp256k1, SecretKey};
use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
+ use chain::keysinterface::{KeysManager,KeysInterface};
use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelCounterparty, ChannelDetails};
use ln::features::{InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures};
use routing::scoring::{FixedPenaltyScorer, ProbabilisticScorer, ProbabilisticScoringParameters, Scorer};
use util::logger::{Logger, Record};
+ use util::test_utils::TestLogger;
use test::Bencher;
node_id,
unspendable_punishment_reserve: 0,
forwarding_info: None,
+ outbound_htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ outbound_htlc_maximum_msat: None,
},
funding_txo: Some(OutPoint {
txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0
}),
+ channel_type: None,
short_channel_id: Some(1),
+ inbound_scid_alias: None,
+ outbound_scid_alias: None,
channel_value_satoshis: 10_000_000,
user_channel_id: 0,
balance_msat: 10_000_000,
outbound_capacity_msat: 10_000_000,
+ next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat: 10_000_000,
inbound_capacity_msat: 0,
unspendable_punishment_reserve: None,
confirmations_required: None,
force_close_spend_delay: None,
is_outbound: true,
- is_funding_locked: true,
+ is_channel_ready: true,
is_usable: true,
is_public: true,
+ inbound_htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ inbound_htlc_maximum_msat: None,
}
}
#[bench]
fn generate_routes_with_probabilistic_scorer(bench: &mut Bencher) {
+ let logger = TestLogger::new();
let network_graph = read_network_graph();
let params = ProbabilisticScoringParameters::default();
- let scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &network_graph);
+ let scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &network_graph, &logger);
generate_routes(bench, &network_graph, scorer, InvoiceFeatures::empty());
}
#[bench]
fn generate_mpp_routes_with_probabilistic_scorer(bench: &mut Bencher) {
+ let logger = TestLogger::new();
let network_graph = read_network_graph();
let params = ProbabilisticScoringParameters::default();
- let scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &network_graph);
+ let scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &network_graph, &logger);
generate_routes(bench, &network_graph, scorer, InvoiceFeatures::known());
}
) {
let nodes = graph.read_only().nodes().clone();
let payer = payer_pubkey();
+ let keys_manager = KeysManager::new(&[0u8; 32], 42, 42);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
// First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
let mut routes = Vec::new();
let mut route_endpoints = Vec::new();
let mut seed: usize = 0xdeadbeef;
- 'load_endpoints: for _ in 0..100 {
+ 'load_endpoints: for _ in 0..150 {
loop {
seed *= 0xdeadbeef;
let src = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
let params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(dst).with_features(features.clone());
let first_hop = first_hop(src);
let amt = seed as u64 % 1_000_000;
- if let Ok(route) = get_route(&payer, ¶ms, &graph, Some(&[&first_hop]), amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer) {
+ if let Ok(route) = get_route(&payer, ¶ms, &graph.read_only(), Some(&[&first_hop]), amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) {
routes.push(route);
route_endpoints.push((first_hop, params, amt));
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
}
+ // Because we've changed channel scores, its possible we'll take different routes to the
+ // selected destinations, possibly causing us to fail because, eg, the newly-selected path
+ // requires a too-high CLTV delta.
+ route_endpoints.retain(|(first_hop, params, amt)| {
+ get_route(&payer, params, &graph.read_only(), Some(&[first_hop]), *amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).is_ok()
+ });
+ route_endpoints.truncate(100);
+ assert_eq!(route_endpoints.len(), 100);
+
// ...then benchmark finding paths between the nodes we learned.
let mut idx = 0;
bench.iter(|| {
let (first_hop, params, amt) = &route_endpoints[idx % route_endpoints.len()];
- assert!(get_route(&payer, params, &graph, Some(&[first_hop]), *amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok());
+ assert!(get_route(&payer, params, &graph.read_only(), Some(&[first_hop]), *amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).is_ok());
idx += 1;
});
}
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff