use ln::channelmanager::ChannelDetails;
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs::{DecodeError, ErrorAction, LightningError, MAX_VALUE_MSAT};
-use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, RoutingFees};
+use routing::scoring::Score;
+use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NodeId, RoutingFees};
use util::ser::{Writeable, Readable};
-use util::logger::Logger;
+use util::logger::{Level, Logger};
+use io;
use prelude::*;
use alloc::collections::BinaryHeap;
use core::cmp;
use core::ops::Deref;
/// A hop in a route
-#[derive(Clone, PartialEq)]
+#[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct RouteHop {
/// The node_id of the node at this hop.
pub pubkey: PublicKey,
/// A route directs a payment from the sender (us) to the recipient. If the recipient supports MPP,
/// it can take multiple paths. Each path is composed of one or more hops through the network.
-#[derive(Clone, PartialEq)]
+#[derive(Clone, Hash, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct Route {
/// The list of routes taken for a single (potentially-)multi-part payment. The pubkey of the
/// last RouteHop in each path must be the same.
/// given path is variable, keeping the length of any path to less than 20 should currently
/// ensure it is viable.
pub paths: Vec<Vec<RouteHop>>,
+ /// The `payee` parameter passed to [`find_route`].
+ /// This is used by `ChannelManager` to track information which may be required for retries,
+ /// provided back to you via [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`].
+ ///
+ /// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
+ pub payee: Option<Payee>,
+}
+
+pub(crate) trait RoutePath {
+ /// Gets the fees for a given path, excluding any excess paid to the recipient.
+ fn get_path_fees(&self) -> u64;
+}
+impl RoutePath for Vec<RouteHop> {
+ fn get_path_fees(&self) -> u64 {
+ // Do not count last hop of each path since that's the full value of the payment
+ self.split_last().map(|(_, path_prefix)| path_prefix).unwrap_or(&[])
+ .iter().map(|hop| &hop.fee_msat)
+ .sum()
+ }
+}
+
+impl Route {
+ /// Returns the total amount of fees paid on this [`Route`].
+ ///
+ /// This doesn't include any extra payment made to the recipient, which can happen in excess of
+ /// the amount passed to [`find_route`]'s `params.final_value_msat`.
+ pub fn get_total_fees(&self) -> u64 {
+ self.paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_path_fees()).sum()
+ }
+
+ /// Returns the total amount paid on this [`Route`], excluding the fees.
+ pub fn get_total_amount(&self) -> u64 {
+ return self.paths.iter()
+ .map(|path| path.split_last().map(|(hop, _)| hop.fee_msat).unwrap_or(0))
+ .sum();
+ }
}
const SERIALIZATION_VERSION: u8 = 1;
const MIN_SERIALIZATION_VERSION: u8 = 1;
impl Writeable for Route {
- fn write<W: ::util::ser::Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), ::std::io::Error> {
+ fn write<W: ::util::ser::Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), io::Error> {
write_ver_prefix!(writer, SERIALIZATION_VERSION, MIN_SERIALIZATION_VERSION);
(self.paths.len() as u64).write(writer)?;
for hops in self.paths.iter() {
hop.write(writer)?;
}
}
- write_tlv_fields!(writer, {});
+ write_tlv_fields!(writer, {
+ (1, self.payee, option),
+ });
Ok(())
}
}
impl Readable for Route {
- fn read<R: ::std::io::Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<Route, DecodeError> {
+ fn read<R: io::Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<Route, DecodeError> {
let _ver = read_ver_prefix!(reader, SERIALIZATION_VERSION);
let path_count: u64 = Readable::read(reader)?;
let mut paths = Vec::with_capacity(cmp::min(path_count, 128) as usize);
}
paths.push(hops);
}
- read_tlv_fields!(reader, {});
- Ok(Route { paths })
+ let mut payee = None;
+ read_tlv_fields!(reader, {
+ (1, payee, option),
+ });
+ Ok(Route { paths, payee })
+ }
+}
+
+/// Parameters needed to find a [`Route`] for paying a [`Payee`].
+///
+/// Passed to [`find_route`] and also provided in [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`] for retrying a failed
+/// payment path.
+///
+/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
+#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
+pub struct RouteParameters {
+ /// The recipient of the failed payment path.
+ pub payee: Payee,
+
+ /// The amount in msats sent on the failed payment path.
+ pub final_value_msat: u64,
+
+ /// The CLTV on the final hop of the failed payment path.
+ pub final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
+}
+
+impl_writeable_tlv_based!(RouteParameters, {
+ (0, payee, required),
+ (2, final_value_msat, required),
+ (4, final_cltv_expiry_delta, required),
+});
+
+/// The recipient of a payment.
+#[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, PartialEq, Eq)]
+pub struct Payee {
+ /// The node id of the payee.
+ pub pubkey: PublicKey,
+
+ /// Features supported by the payee.
+ ///
+ /// May be set from the payee's invoice or via [`for_keysend`]. May be `None` if the invoice
+ /// does not contain any features.
+ ///
+ /// [`for_keysend`]: Self::for_keysend
+ pub features: Option<InvoiceFeatures>,
+
+ /// Hints for routing to the payee, containing channels connecting the payee to public nodes.
+ pub route_hints: Vec<RouteHint>,
+
+ /// Expiration of a payment to the payee, in seconds relative to the UNIX epoch.
+ pub expiry_time: Option<u64>,
+}
+
+impl_writeable_tlv_based!(Payee, {
+ (0, pubkey, required),
+ (2, features, option),
+ (4, route_hints, vec_type),
+ (6, expiry_time, option),
+});
+
+impl Payee {
+ /// Creates a payee with the node id of the given `pubkey`.
+ pub fn from_node_id(pubkey: PublicKey) -> Self {
+ Self {
+ pubkey,
+ features: None,
+ route_hints: vec![],
+ expiry_time: None,
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// Creates a payee with the node id of the given `pubkey` to use for keysend payments.
+ pub fn for_keysend(pubkey: PublicKey) -> Self {
+ Self::from_node_id(pubkey).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::for_keysend())
+ }
+
+ /// Includes the payee's features.
+ ///
+ /// (C-not exported) since bindings don't support move semantics
+ pub fn with_features(self, features: InvoiceFeatures) -> Self {
+ Self { features: Some(features), ..self }
+ }
+
+ /// Includes hints for routing to the payee.
+ ///
+ /// (C-not exported) since bindings don't support move semantics
+ pub fn with_route_hints(self, route_hints: Vec<RouteHint>) -> Self {
+ Self { route_hints, ..self }
+ }
+
+ /// Includes a payment expiration in seconds relative to the UNIX epoch.
+ ///
+ /// (C-not exported) since bindings don't support move semantics
+ pub fn with_expiry_time(self, expiry_time: u64) -> Self {
+ Self { expiry_time: Some(expiry_time), ..self }
}
}
/// A list of hops along a payment path terminating with a channel to the recipient.
-#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug, Clone)]
+#[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, Eq, PartialEq)]
pub struct RouteHint(pub Vec<RouteHintHop>);
+
+impl Writeable for RouteHint {
+ fn write<W: ::util::ser::Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), io::Error> {
+ (self.0.len() as u64).write(writer)?;
+ for hop in self.0.iter() {
+ hop.write(writer)?;
+ }
+ Ok(())
+ }
+}
+
+impl Readable for RouteHint {
+ fn read<R: io::Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<Self, DecodeError> {
+ let hop_count: u64 = Readable::read(reader)?;
+ let mut hops = Vec::with_capacity(cmp::min(hop_count, 16) as usize);
+ for _ in 0..hop_count {
+ hops.push(Readable::read(reader)?);
+ }
+ Ok(Self(hops))
+ }
+}
+
/// A channel descriptor for a hop along a payment path.
-#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug, Clone)]
+#[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, Eq, PartialEq)]
pub struct RouteHintHop {
/// The node_id of the non-target end of the route
pub src_node_id: PublicKey,
pub htlc_maximum_msat: Option<u64>,
}
+impl_writeable_tlv_based!(RouteHintHop, {
+ (0, src_node_id, required),
+ (1, htlc_minimum_msat, option),
+ (2, short_channel_id, required),
+ (3, htlc_maximum_msat, option),
+ (4, fees, required),
+ (6, cltv_expiry_delta, required),
+});
+
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq)]
struct RouteGraphNode {
- pubkey: PublicKey,
+ node_id: NodeId,
lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node: u64,
lowest_fee_to_node: u64,
// The maximum value a yet-to-be-constructed payment path might flow through this node.
/// The effective htlc_minimum_msat at this hop. If a later hop on the path had a higher HTLC
/// minimum, we use it, plus the fees required at each earlier hop to meet it.
path_htlc_minimum_msat: u64,
+ /// All penalties incurred from this hop on the way to the destination, as calculated using
+ /// channel scoring.
+ path_penalty_msat: u64,
}
impl cmp::Ord for RouteGraphNode {
fn cmp(&self, other: &RouteGraphNode) -> cmp::Ordering {
- let other_score = cmp::max(other.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, other.path_htlc_minimum_msat);
- let self_score = cmp::max(self.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, self.path_htlc_minimum_msat);
- other_score.cmp(&self_score).then_with(|| other.pubkey.serialize().cmp(&self.pubkey.serialize()))
+ let other_score = cmp::max(other.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, other.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
+ .checked_add(other.path_penalty_msat)
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ let self_score = cmp::max(self.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, self.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
+ .checked_add(self.path_penalty_msat)
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ other_score.cmp(&self_score).then_with(|| other.node_id.cmp(&self.node_id))
}
}
struct PathBuildingHop<'a> {
// The RouteHintHop fields which will eventually be used if this hop is used in a final Route.
// Note that node_features is calculated separately after our initial graph walk.
- pubkey: PublicKey,
+ node_id: NodeId,
short_channel_id: u64,
channel_features: &'a ChannelFeatures,
fee_msat: u64,
/// A mirror of the same field in RouteGraphNode. Note that this is only used during the graph
/// walk and may be invalid thereafter.
path_htlc_minimum_msat: u64,
+ /// All penalties incurred from this channel on the way to the destination, as calculated using
+ /// channel scoring.
+ path_penalty_msat: u64,
/// If we've already processed a node as the best node, we shouldn't process it again. Normally
/// we'd just ignore it if we did as all channels would have a higher new fee, but because we
/// may decrease the amounts in use as we walk the graph, the actual calculated fee may
}
}
-/// Gets a route from us (payer) to the given target node (payee).
+/// Finds a route from us (payer) to the given target node (payee).
///
-/// If the payee provided features in their invoice, they should be provided via payee_features.
+/// If the payee provided features in their invoice, they should be provided via `params.payee`.
/// Without this, MPP will only be used if the payee's features are available in the network graph.
///
-/// Private routing paths between a public node and the target may be included in `last_hops`.
-/// Currently, only the last hop in each path is considered.
+/// Private routing paths between a public node and the target may be included in `params.payee`.
+///
+/// If some channels aren't announced, it may be useful to fill in `first_hops` with the results
+/// from [`ChannelManager::list_usable_channels`]. If it is filled in, the view of our local
+/// channels from [`NetworkGraph`] will be ignored, and only those in `first_hops` will be used.
+///
+/// The fees on channels from us to the next hop are ignored as they are assumed to all be equal.
+/// However, the enabled/disabled bit on such channels as well as the `htlc_minimum_msat` /
+/// `htlc_maximum_msat` *are* checked as they may change based on the receiving node.
+///
+/// # Note
+///
+/// May be used to re-compute a [`Route`] when handling a [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]. Any
+/// adjustments to the [`NetworkGraph`] and channel scores should be made prior to calling this
+/// function.
///
-/// If some channels aren't announced, it may be useful to fill in a first_hops with the
-/// results from a local ChannelManager::list_usable_channels() call. If it is filled in, our
-/// view of our local channels (from net_graph_msg_handler) will be ignored, and only those
-/// in first_hops will be used.
+/// # Panics
///
-/// Panics if first_hops contains channels without short_channel_ids
-/// (ChannelManager::list_usable_channels will never include such channels).
+/// Panics if first_hops contains channels without short_channel_ids;
+/// [`ChannelManager::list_usable_channels`] will never include such channels.
///
-/// The fees on channels from us to next-hops are ignored (as they are assumed to all be
-/// equal), however the enabled/disabled bit on such channels as well as the
-/// htlc_minimum_msat/htlc_maximum_msat *are* checked as they may change based on the receiving node.
-pub fn get_route<L: Deref>(our_node_id: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, payee: &PublicKey, payee_features: Option<InvoiceFeatures>, first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>,
- last_hops: &[&RouteHint], final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv: u32, logger: L) -> Result<Route, LightningError> where L::Target: Logger {
- // TODO: Obviously *only* using total fee cost sucks. We should consider weighting by
- // uptime/success in using a node in the past.
- if *payee == *our_node_id {
+/// [`ChannelManager::list_usable_channels`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::list_usable_channels
+/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
+pub fn find_route<L: Deref, S: Score>(
+ our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, params: &RouteParameters, network: &NetworkGraph,
+ first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, logger: L, scorer: &S
+) -> Result<Route, LightningError>
+where L::Target: Logger {
+ get_route(
+ our_node_pubkey, ¶ms.payee, network, first_hops, params.final_value_msat,
+ params.final_cltv_expiry_delta, logger, scorer
+ )
+}
+
+pub(crate) fn get_route<L: Deref, S: Score>(
+ our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, payee: &Payee, network: &NetworkGraph,
+ first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
+ logger: L, scorer: &S
+) -> Result<Route, LightningError>
+where L::Target: Logger {
+ let payee_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&payee.pubkey);
+ let our_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&our_node_pubkey);
+
+ if payee_node_id == our_node_id {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Cannot generate a route to ourselves".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
return Err(LightningError{err: "Cannot send a payment of 0 msat".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
- let last_hops = last_hops.iter().filter_map(|hops| hops.0.last()).collect::<Vec<_>>();
- for last_hop in last_hops.iter() {
- if last_hop.src_node_id == *payee {
- return Err(LightningError{err: "Last hop cannot have a payee as a source.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
+ for route in payee.route_hints.iter() {
+ for hop in &route.0 {
+ if hop.src_node_id == payee.pubkey {
+ return Err(LightningError{err: "Route hint cannot have the payee as the source.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
+ }
}
}
// to use as the A* heuristic beyond just the cost to get one node further than the current
// one.
+ let network_graph = network.read_only();
+ let network_channels = network_graph.channels();
+ let network_nodes = network_graph.nodes();
let dummy_directional_info = DummyDirectionalChannelInfo { // used for first_hops routes
cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
// Allow MPP only if we have a features set from somewhere that indicates the payee supports
// it. If the payee supports it they're supposed to include it in the invoice, so that should
// work reliably.
- let allow_mpp = if let Some(features) = &payee_features {
+ let allow_mpp = if let Some(features) = &payee.features {
features.supports_basic_mpp()
- } else if let Some(node) = network.get_nodes().get(&payee) {
+ } else if let Some(node) = network_nodes.get(&payee_node_id) {
if let Some(node_info) = node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
node_info.features.supports_basic_mpp()
} else { false }
} else { false };
+ log_trace!(logger, "Searching for a route from payer {} to payee {} {} MPP", our_node_pubkey,
+ payee.pubkey, if allow_mpp { "with" } else { "without" });
// Step (1).
// Prepare the data we'll use for payee-to-payer search by
// inserting first hops suggested by the caller as targets.
// Our search will then attempt to reach them while traversing from the payee node.
- let mut first_hop_targets: HashMap<_, (_, ChannelFeatures, _, NodeFeatures)> =
+ let mut first_hop_targets: HashMap<_, Vec<(_, ChannelFeatures, _, NodeFeatures)>> =
HashMap::with_capacity(if first_hops.is_some() { first_hops.as_ref().unwrap().len() } else { 0 });
if let Some(hops) = first_hops {
for chan in hops {
let short_channel_id = chan.short_channel_id.expect("first_hops should be filled in with usable channels, not pending ones");
- if chan.counterparty.node_id == *our_node_id {
- return Err(LightningError{err: "First hop cannot have our_node_id as a destination.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
+ if chan.counterparty.node_id == *our_node_pubkey {
+ return Err(LightningError{err: "First hop cannot have our_node_pubkey as a destination.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
- first_hop_targets.insert(chan.counterparty.node_id, (short_channel_id, chan.counterparty.features.to_context(), chan.outbound_capacity_msat, chan.counterparty.features.to_context()));
+ first_hop_targets.entry(NodeId::from_pubkey(&chan.counterparty.node_id)).or_insert(Vec::new())
+ .push((short_channel_id, chan.counterparty.features.to_context(), chan.outbound_capacity_msat, chan.counterparty.features.to_context()));
}
if first_hop_targets.is_empty() {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Cannot route when there are no outbound routes away from us".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
// Map from node_id to information about the best current path to that node, including feerate
// information.
- let mut dist = HashMap::with_capacity(network.get_nodes().len());
+ let mut dist = HashMap::with_capacity(network_nodes.len());
// During routing, if we ignore a path due to an htlc_minimum_msat limit, we set this,
// indicating that we may wish to try again with a higher value, potentially paying to meet an
// This map allows paths to be aware of the channel use by other paths in the same call.
// This would help to make a better path finding decisions and not "overbook" channels.
// It is unaware of the directions (except for `outbound_capacity_msat` in `first_hops`).
- let mut bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat = HashMap::with_capacity(network.get_nodes().len());
+ let mut bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat = HashMap::with_capacity(network_nodes.len());
// Keeping track of how much value we already collected across other paths. Helps to decide:
// - how much a new path should be transferring (upper bound);
// - when we want to stop looking for new paths.
let mut already_collected_value_msat = 0;
- log_trace!(logger, "Building path from {} (payee) to {} (us/payer) for value {} msat.", payee, our_node_id, final_value_msat);
+ log_trace!(logger, "Building path from {} (payee) to {} (us/payer) for value {} msat.", payee.pubkey, our_node_pubkey, final_value_msat);
macro_rules! add_entry {
// Adds entry which goes from $src_node_id to $dest_node_id
// since that value has to be transferred over this channel.
// Returns whether this channel caused an update to `targets`.
( $chan_id: expr, $src_node_id: expr, $dest_node_id: expr, $directional_info: expr, $capacity_sats: expr, $chan_features: expr, $next_hops_fee_msat: expr,
- $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr ) => { {
+ $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat: expr ) => { {
// We "return" whether we updated the path at the end, via this:
let mut did_add_update_path_to_src_node = false;
// Channels to self should not be used. This is more of belt-and-suspenders, because in
// might violate htlc_minimum_msat on the hops which are next along the
// payment path (upstream to the payee). To avoid that, we recompute path
// path fees knowing the final path contribution after constructing it.
- let path_htlc_minimum_msat = match compute_fees($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $directional_info.fees)
- .map(|fee_msat| fee_msat.checked_add($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat)) {
- Some(Some(value_msat)) => cmp::max(value_msat, $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat),
- _ => u64::max_value()
- };
- let hm_entry = dist.entry(&$src_node_id);
+ let path_htlc_minimum_msat = compute_fees($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $directional_info.fees)
+ .and_then(|fee_msat| fee_msat.checked_add($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat))
+ .map(|fee_msat| cmp::max(fee_msat, $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat))
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ let hm_entry = dist.entry($src_node_id);
let old_entry = hm_entry.or_insert_with(|| {
// If there was previously no known way to access
// the source node (recall it goes payee-to-payer) of $chan_id, first add
// as a way to reach the $dest_node_id.
let mut fee_base_msat = u32::max_value();
let mut fee_proportional_millionths = u32::max_value();
- if let Some(Some(fees)) = network.get_nodes().get(&$src_node_id).map(|node| node.lowest_inbound_channel_fees) {
+ if let Some(Some(fees)) = network_nodes.get(&$src_node_id).map(|node| node.lowest_inbound_channel_fees) {
fee_base_msat = fees.base_msat;
fee_proportional_millionths = fees.proportional_millionths;
}
PathBuildingHop {
- pubkey: $dest_node_id.clone(),
+ node_id: $dest_node_id.clone(),
short_channel_id: 0,
channel_features: $chan_features,
fee_msat: 0,
total_fee_msat: u64::max_value(),
htlc_minimum_msat: $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat,
path_htlc_minimum_msat,
+ path_penalty_msat: u64::max_value(),
was_processed: false,
#[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
value_contribution_msat,
// Ignore hop_use_fee_msat for channel-from-us as we assume all channels-from-us
// will have the same effective-fee
- if $src_node_id != *our_node_id {
+ if $src_node_id != our_node_id {
match compute_fees(amount_to_transfer_over_msat, $directional_info.fees) {
// max_value means we'll always fail
// the old_entry.total_fee_msat > total_fee_msat check
}
}
+ let path_penalty_msat = $next_hops_path_penalty_msat.checked_add(
+ scorer.channel_penalty_msat($chan_id.clone(), amount_to_transfer_over_msat, Some(*available_liquidity_msat),
+ &$src_node_id, &$dest_node_id)).unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
let new_graph_node = RouteGraphNode {
- pubkey: $src_node_id,
+ node_id: $src_node_id,
lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node: total_fee_msat,
lowest_fee_to_node: $next_hops_fee_msat as u64 + hop_use_fee_msat,
value_contribution_msat: value_contribution_msat,
path_htlc_minimum_msat,
+ path_penalty_msat,
};
// Update the way of reaching $src_node_id with the given $chan_id (from $dest_node_id),
// but it may require additional tracking - we don't want to double-count
// the fees included in $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, but also
// can't use something that may decrease on future hops.
- let old_cost = cmp::max(old_entry.total_fee_msat, old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat);
- let new_cost = cmp::max(total_fee_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat);
+ let old_cost = cmp::max(old_entry.total_fee_msat, old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
+ .checked_add(old_entry.path_penalty_msat)
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ let new_cost = cmp::max(total_fee_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat)
+ .checked_add(path_penalty_msat)
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
if !old_entry.was_processed && new_cost < old_cost {
targets.push(new_graph_node);
old_entry.next_hops_fee_msat = $next_hops_fee_msat;
old_entry.hop_use_fee_msat = hop_use_fee_msat;
old_entry.total_fee_msat = total_fee_msat;
- old_entry.pubkey = $dest_node_id.clone();
+ old_entry.node_id = $dest_node_id.clone();
old_entry.short_channel_id = $chan_id.clone();
old_entry.channel_features = $chan_features;
old_entry.fee_msat = 0; // This value will be later filled with hop_use_fee_msat of the following channel
old_entry.channel_fees = $directional_info.fees;
old_entry.htlc_minimum_msat = $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat;
old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat = path_htlc_minimum_msat;
+ old_entry.path_penalty_msat = path_penalty_msat;
#[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
{
old_entry.value_contribution_msat = value_contribution_msat;
// with a lower htlc_maximum_msat instead of the one we'd
// already decided to use.
debug_assert!(path_htlc_minimum_msat < old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat);
- debug_assert!(value_contribution_msat < old_entry.value_contribution_msat);
+ debug_assert!(
+ value_contribution_msat + path_penalty_msat <
+ old_entry.value_contribution_msat + old_entry.path_penalty_msat
+ );
}
}
}
// meaning how much will be paid in fees after this node (to the best of our knowledge).
// This data can later be helpful to optimize routing (pay lower fees).
macro_rules! add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node {
- ( $node: expr, $node_id: expr, $fee_to_target_msat: expr, $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr ) => {
- let skip_node = if let Some(elem) = dist.get_mut($node_id) {
+ ( $node: expr, $node_id: expr, $fee_to_target_msat: expr, $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat: expr ) => {
+ let skip_node = if let Some(elem) = dist.get_mut(&$node_id) {
let was_processed = elem.was_processed;
elem.was_processed = true;
was_processed
// Entries are added to dist in add_entry!() when there is a channel from a node.
// Because there are no channels from payee, it will not have a dist entry at this point.
// If we're processing any other node, it is always be the result of a channel from it.
- assert_eq!($node_id, payee);
+ assert_eq!($node_id, payee_node_id);
false
};
if !skip_node {
- if first_hops.is_some() {
- if let Some(&(ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _)) = first_hop_targets.get(&$node_id) {
- add_entry!(first_hop, *our_node_id, $node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat);
+ if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&$node_id) {
+ for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels {
+ add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id, $node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat);
}
}
if !features.requires_unknown_bits() {
for chan_id in $node.channels.iter() {
- let chan = network.get_channels().get(chan_id).unwrap();
+ let chan = network_channels.get(chan_id).unwrap();
if !chan.features.requires_unknown_bits() {
- if chan.node_one == *$node_id {
+ if chan.node_one == $node_id {
// ie $node is one, ie next hop in A* is two, via the two_to_one channel
- if first_hops.is_none() || chan.node_two != *our_node_id {
+ if first_hops.is_none() || chan.node_two != our_node_id {
if let Some(two_to_one) = chan.two_to_one.as_ref() {
if two_to_one.enabled {
- add_entry!(chan_id, chan.node_two, chan.node_one, two_to_one, chan.capacity_sats, &chan.features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat);
+ add_entry!(chan_id, chan.node_two, chan.node_one, two_to_one, chan.capacity_sats, &chan.features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat);
}
}
}
} else {
- if first_hops.is_none() || chan.node_one != *our_node_id {
+ if first_hops.is_none() || chan.node_one != our_node_id{
if let Some(one_to_two) = chan.one_to_two.as_ref() {
if one_to_two.enabled {
- add_entry!(chan_id, chan.node_one, chan.node_two, one_to_two, chan.capacity_sats, &chan.features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat);
+ add_entry!(chan_id, chan.node_one, chan.node_two, one_to_two, chan.capacity_sats, &chan.features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat);
}
}
}
// If first hop is a private channel and the only way to reach the payee, this is the only
// place where it could be added.
- if first_hops.is_some() {
- if let Some(&(ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _)) = first_hop_targets.get(&payee) {
- add_entry!(first_hop, *our_node_id, payee, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, 0, path_value_msat, 0);
+ if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&payee_node_id) {
+ for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels {
+ let added = add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id, payee_node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64);
+ log_trace!(logger, "{} direct route to payee via SCID {}", if added { "Added" } else { "Skipped" }, first_hop);
}
}
// Add the payee as a target, so that the payee-to-payer
// search algorithm knows what to start with.
- match network.get_nodes().get(payee) {
+ match network_nodes.get(&payee_node_id) {
// The payee is not in our network graph, so nothing to add here.
// There is still a chance of reaching them via last_hops though,
// so don't yet fail the payment here.
// If not, targets.pop() will not even let us enter the loop in step 2.
None => {},
Some(node) => {
- add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee, 0, path_value_msat, 0);
+ add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64);
},
}
- // Step (1).
+ // Step (2).
// If a caller provided us with last hops, add them to routing targets. Since this happens
// earlier than general path finding, they will be somewhat prioritized, although currently
// it matters only if the fees are exactly the same.
- for hop in last_hops.iter() {
+ for route in payee.route_hints.iter().filter(|route| !route.0.is_empty()) {
+ let first_hop_in_route = &(route.0)[0];
let have_hop_src_in_graph =
- // Only add the last hop to our candidate set if either we have a direct channel or
- // they are in the regular network graph.
- first_hop_targets.get(&hop.src_node_id).is_some() ||
- network.get_nodes().get(&hop.src_node_id).is_some();
+ // Only add the hops in this route to our candidate set if either
+ // we have a direct channel to the first hop or the first hop is
+ // in the regular network graph.
+ first_hop_targets.get(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&first_hop_in_route.src_node_id)).is_some() ||
+ network_nodes.get(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&first_hop_in_route.src_node_id)).is_some();
if have_hop_src_in_graph {
- // BOLT 11 doesn't allow inclusion of features for the last hop hints, which
- // really sucks, cause we're gonna need that eventually.
- let last_hop_htlc_minimum_msat: u64 = match hop.htlc_minimum_msat {
- Some(htlc_minimum_msat) => htlc_minimum_msat,
- None => 0
- };
- let directional_info = DummyDirectionalChannelInfo {
- cltv_expiry_delta: hop.cltv_expiry_delta as u32,
- htlc_minimum_msat: last_hop_htlc_minimum_msat,
- htlc_maximum_msat: hop.htlc_maximum_msat,
- fees: hop.fees,
- };
- // We assume that the recipient only included route hints for routes which had
- // sufficient value to route `final_value_msat`. Note that in the case of "0-value"
- // invoices where the invoice does not specify value this may not be the case, but
- // better to include the hints than not.
- if add_entry!(hop.short_channel_id, hop.src_node_id, payee, directional_info, Some((final_value_msat + 999) / 1000), &empty_channel_features, 0, path_value_msat, 0) {
- // If this hop connects to a node with which we have a direct channel,
- // ignore the network graph and, if the last hop was added, add our
- // direct channel to the candidate set.
- //
- // Note that we *must* check if the last hop was added as `add_entry`
- // always assumes that the third argument is a node to which we have a
- // path.
- if let Some(&(ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _)) = first_hop_targets.get(&hop.src_node_id) {
- add_entry!(first_hop, *our_node_id , hop.src_node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, 0, path_value_msat, 0);
+ // We start building the path from reverse, i.e., from payee
+ // to the first RouteHintHop in the path.
+ let hop_iter = route.0.iter().rev();
+ let prev_hop_iter = core::iter::once(&payee.pubkey).chain(
+ route.0.iter().skip(1).rev().map(|hop| &hop.src_node_id));
+ let mut hop_used = true;
+ let mut aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat: u64 = 0;
+ let mut aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: u64 = 0;
+ let mut aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat: u64 = 0;
+
+ for (idx, (hop, prev_hop_id)) in hop_iter.zip(prev_hop_iter).enumerate() {
+ // BOLT 11 doesn't allow inclusion of features for the last hop hints, which
+ // really sucks, cause we're gonna need that eventually.
+ let hop_htlc_minimum_msat: u64 = hop.htlc_minimum_msat.unwrap_or(0);
+
+ let directional_info = DummyDirectionalChannelInfo {
+ cltv_expiry_delta: hop.cltv_expiry_delta as u32,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: hop_htlc_minimum_msat,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: hop.htlc_maximum_msat,
+ fees: hop.fees,
+ };
+
+ // We want a value of final_value_msat * ROUTE_CAPACITY_PROVISION_FACTOR but we
+ // need it to increment at each hop by the fee charged at later hops. Further,
+ // we need to ensure we round up when we divide to get satoshis.
+ let channel_cap_msat = final_value_msat
+ .checked_mul(ROUTE_CAPACITY_PROVISION_FACTOR).and_then(|v| v.checked_add(aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat))
+ .unwrap_or(u64::max_value());
+ let channel_cap_sat = match channel_cap_msat.checked_add(999) {
+ None => break, // We overflowed above, just ignore this route hint
+ Some(val) => Some(val / 1000),
+ };
+
+ let src_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id);
+ let dest_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id);
+ aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat = aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat
+ .checked_add(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(hop.short_channel_id, final_value_msat, None, &src_node_id, &dest_node_id))
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+
+ // We assume that the recipient only included route hints for routes which had
+ // sufficient value to route `final_value_msat`. Note that in the case of "0-value"
+ // invoices where the invoice does not specify value this may not be the case, but
+ // better to include the hints than not.
+ if !add_entry!(hop.short_channel_id, src_node_id, dest_node_id, directional_info, channel_cap_sat, &empty_channel_features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat) {
+ // If this hop was not used then there is no use checking the preceding hops
+ // in the RouteHint. We can break by just searching for a direct channel between
+ // last checked hop and first_hop_targets
+ hop_used = false;
+ }
+
+ // Searching for a direct channel between last checked hop and first_hop_targets
+ if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id)) {
+ for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels {
+ add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id , NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id), dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if !hop_used {
+ break;
+ }
+
+ // In the next values of the iterator, the aggregate fees already reflects
+ // the sum of value sent from payer (final_value_msat) and routing fees
+ // for the last node in the RouteHint. We need to just add the fees to
+ // route through the current node so that the preceeding node (next iteration)
+ // can use it.
+ let hops_fee = compute_fees(aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat + final_value_msat, hop.fees)
+ .map_or(None, |inc| inc.checked_add(aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat));
+ aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat = if let Some(val) = hops_fee { val } else { break; };
+
+ let hop_htlc_minimum_msat_inc = if let Some(val) = compute_fees(aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, hop.fees) { val } else { break; };
+ let hops_path_htlc_minimum = aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat
+ .checked_add(hop_htlc_minimum_msat_inc);
+ aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat = if let Some(val) = hops_path_htlc_minimum { cmp::max(hop_htlc_minimum_msat, val) } else { break; };
+
+ if idx == route.0.len() - 1 {
+ // The last hop in this iterator is the first hop in
+ // overall RouteHint.
+ // If this hop connects to a node with which we have a direct channel,
+ // ignore the network graph and, if the last hop was added, add our
+ // direct channel to the candidate set.
+ //
+ // Note that we *must* check if the last hop was added as `add_entry`
+ // always assumes that the third argument is a node to which we have a
+ // path.
+ if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id)) {
+ for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels {
+ add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id , NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id), dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat);
+ }
+ }
}
}
}
// last hops communicated by the caller, and the payment receiver.
let mut found_new_path = false;
- // Step (2).
+ // Step (3).
// If this loop terminates due the exhaustion of targets, two situations are possible:
// - not enough outgoing liquidity:
// 0 < already_collected_value_msat < final_value_msat
// Both these cases (and other cases except reaching recommended_value_msat) mean that
// paths_collection will be stopped because found_new_path==false.
// This is not necessarily a routing failure.
- 'path_construction: while let Some(RouteGraphNode { pubkey, lowest_fee_to_node, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, .. }) = targets.pop() {
+ 'path_construction: while let Some(RouteGraphNode { node_id, lowest_fee_to_node, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat, .. }) = targets.pop() {
// Since we're going payee-to-payer, hitting our node as a target means we should stop
// traversing the graph and arrange the path out of what we found.
- if pubkey == *our_node_id {
+ if node_id == our_node_id {
let mut new_entry = dist.remove(&our_node_id).unwrap();
let mut ordered_hops = vec!((new_entry.clone(), NodeFeatures::empty()));
'path_walk: loop {
- if let Some(&(_, _, _, ref features)) = first_hop_targets.get(&ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.pubkey) {
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = features.clone();
- } else if let Some(node) = network.get_nodes().get(&ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.pubkey) {
- if let Some(node_info) = node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = node_info.features.clone();
+ let mut features_set = false;
+ if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id) {
+ for (scid, _, _, ref features) in first_channels {
+ if *scid == ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.short_channel_id {
+ ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = features.clone();
+ features_set = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ if !features_set {
+ if let Some(node) = network_nodes.get(&ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id) {
+ if let Some(node_info) = node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
+ ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = node_info.features.clone();
+ } else {
+ ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = NodeFeatures::empty();
+ }
} else {
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = NodeFeatures::empty();
+ // We should be able to fill in features for everything except the last
+ // hop, if the last hop was provided via a BOLT 11 invoice (though we
+ // should be able to extend it further as BOLT 11 does have feature
+ // flags for the last hop node itself).
+ assert!(ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id == payee_node_id);
}
- } else {
- // We should be able to fill in features for everything except the last
- // hop, if the last hop was provided via a BOLT 11 invoice (though we
- // should be able to extend it further as BOLT 11 does have feature
- // flags for the last hop node itself).
- assert!(ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.pubkey == *payee);
}
// Means we succesfully traversed from the payer to the payee, now
// save this path for the payment route. Also, update the liquidity
// remaining on the used hops, so that we take them into account
// while looking for more paths.
- if ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.pubkey == *payee {
+ if ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id == payee_node_id {
break 'path_walk;
}
- new_entry = match dist.remove(&ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.pubkey) {
+ new_entry = match dist.remove(&ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id) {
Some(payment_hop) => payment_hop,
// We can't arrive at None because, if we ever add an entry to targets,
// we also fill in the entry in dist (see add_entry!).
}
ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.fee_msat = value_contribution_msat;
ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.hop_use_fee_msat = 0;
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.cltv_expiry_delta = final_cltv;
+ ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.cltv_expiry_delta = final_cltv_expiry_delta;
log_trace!(logger, "Found a path back to us from the target with {} hops contributing up to {} msat: {:?}",
ordered_hops.len(), value_contribution_msat, ordered_hops);
// If we found a path back to the payee, we shouldn't try to process it again. This is
// the equivalent of the `elem.was_processed` check in
// add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!() (see comment there for more info).
- if pubkey == *payee { continue 'path_construction; }
+ if node_id == payee_node_id { continue 'path_construction; }
// Otherwise, since the current target node is not us,
// keep "unrolling" the payment graph from payee to payer by
// finding a way to reach the current target from the payer side.
- match network.get_nodes().get(&pubkey) {
+ match network_nodes.get(&node_id) {
None => {},
Some(node) => {
- add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, &pubkey, lowest_fee_to_node, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat);
+ add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat);
},
}
}
break 'paths_collection;
}
- // Step (3).
+ // Step (4).
// Stop either when the recommended value is reached or if no new path was found in this
// iteration.
// In the latter case, making another path finding attempt won't help,
}
}
- // Step (4).
+ // Step (5).
if payment_paths.len() == 0 {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Failed to find a path to the given destination".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
let mut cur_route = Vec::<PaymentPath>::new();
let mut aggregate_route_value_msat = 0;
- // Step (5).
+ // Step (6).
// TODO: real random shuffle
// Currently just starts with i_th and goes up to i-1_th in a looped way.
let cur_payment_paths = [&payment_paths[i..], &payment_paths[..i]].concat();
- // Step (6).
+ // Step (7).
for payment_path in cur_payment_paths {
cur_route.push(payment_path.clone());
aggregate_route_value_msat += payment_path.get_value_msat();
assert!(cur_route.len() > 0);
- // Step (7).
+ // Step (8).
// Now, substract the overpaid value from the most-expensive path.
// TODO: this could also be optimized by also sorting by feerate_per_sat_routed,
// so that the sender pays less fees overall. And also htlc_minimum_msat.
drawn_routes.push(cur_route);
}
- // Step (8).
+ // Step (9).
// Select the best route by lowest total fee.
drawn_routes.sort_by_key(|paths| paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat()).sum::<u64>());
- let mut selected_paths = Vec::<Vec<RouteHop>>::new();
+ let mut selected_paths = Vec::<Vec<Result<RouteHop, LightningError>>>::new();
for payment_path in drawn_routes.first().unwrap() {
selected_paths.push(payment_path.hops.iter().map(|(payment_hop, node_features)| {
- RouteHop {
- pubkey: payment_hop.pubkey,
+ Ok(RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(payment_hop.node_id.as_slice()).map_err(|_| LightningError{err: format!("Public key {:?} is invalid", &payment_hop.node_id), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreAndLog(Level::Trace)})?,
node_features: node_features.clone(),
short_channel_id: payment_hop.short_channel_id,
channel_features: payment_hop.channel_features.clone(),
fee_msat: payment_hop.fee_msat,
cltv_expiry_delta: payment_hop.cltv_expiry_delta,
- }
+ })
}).collect());
}
- if let Some(features) = &payee_features {
+ if let Some(features) = &payee.features {
for path in selected_paths.iter_mut() {
- path.last_mut().unwrap().node_features = features.to_context();
+ if let Ok(route_hop) = path.last_mut().unwrap() {
+ route_hop.node_features = features.to_context();
+ }
}
}
- let route = Route { paths: selected_paths };
- log_info!(logger, "Got route to {}: {}", payee, log_route!(route));
+ let route = Route {
+ paths: selected_paths.into_iter().map(|path| path.into_iter().collect()).collect::<Result<Vec<_>, _>>()?,
+ payee: Some(payee.clone()),
+ };
+ log_info!(logger, "Got route to {}: {}", payee.pubkey, log_route!(route));
Ok(route)
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
- use routing::router::{get_route, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RoutingFees};
- use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NetGraphMsgHandler};
+ use routing::scoring::Score;
+ use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NetGraphMsgHandler, NodeId};
+ use routing::router::{get_route, Payee, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteHop, RoutingFees};
use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs::{ErrorAction, LightningError, OptionalField, UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, ChannelAnnouncement, RoutingMessageHandler,
funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }),
short_channel_id,
channel_value_satoshis: 0,
- user_id: 0,
+ user_channel_id: 0,
outbound_capacity_msat,
inbound_capacity_msat: 42,
unspendable_punishment_reserve: None,
}
// Using the same keys for LN and BTC ids
- fn add_channel(net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>, node_1_privkey: &SecretKey,
- node_2_privkey: &SecretKey, features: ChannelFeatures, short_channel_id: u64) {
+ fn add_channel(
+ net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<NetworkGraph>, Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>,
+ secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>, node_1_privkey: &SecretKey, node_2_privkey: &SecretKey, features: ChannelFeatures, short_channel_id: u64
+ ) {
let node_id_1 = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_1_privkey);
let node_id_2 = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_2_privkey);
};
}
- fn update_channel(net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>, node_privkey: &SecretKey, update: UnsignedChannelUpdate) {
+ fn update_channel(
+ net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<NetworkGraph>, Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>,
+ secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>, node_privkey: &SecretKey, update: UnsignedChannelUpdate
+ ) {
let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&update.encode()[..])[..]);
let valid_channel_update = ChannelUpdate {
signature: secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, node_privkey),
};
}
- fn add_or_update_node(net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>, node_privkey: &SecretKey,
- features: NodeFeatures, timestamp: u32) {
+ fn add_or_update_node(
+ net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<NetworkGraph>, Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>,
+ secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>, node_privkey: &SecretKey, features: NodeFeatures, timestamp: u32
+ ) {
let node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_privkey);
let unsigned_announcement = UnsignedNodeAnnouncement {
features,
}
}
- fn build_graph() -> (Secp256k1<All>, NetGraphMsgHandler<sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, sync::Arc<crate::util::test_utils::TestLogger>>, sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, sync::Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>) {
+ fn build_graph() -> (
+ Secp256k1<All>,
+ sync::Arc<NetworkGraph>,
+ NetGraphMsgHandler<sync::Arc<NetworkGraph>, sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, sync::Arc<crate::util::test_utils::TestLogger>>,
+ sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>,
+ sync::Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>,
+ ) {
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
let chain_monitor = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet));
- let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
- // Build network from our_id to node7:
+ let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()));
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Arc::clone(&network_graph), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
+ // Build network from our_id to node6:
//
// -1(1)2- node0 -1(3)2-
// / \
// \ /
// -1(7)2- node5 -1(10)2-
//
+ // Channels 5, 8, 9 and 10 are private channels.
+ //
// chan5 1-to-2: enabled, 100 msat fee
// chan5 2-to-1: enabled, 0 fee
//
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[5], NodeFeatures::from_le_bytes(id_to_feature_flags(6)), 0);
- (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger)
+ (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger)
}
#[test]
fn simple_route_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Simple route to 2 via 1
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send a payment of 0 msat");
} else { panic!(); }
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
#[test]
fn invalid_first_hop_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Simple route to 2 via 1
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(2), our_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 100000)];
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
- assert_eq!(err, "First hop cannot have our_node_id as a destination.");
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ assert_eq!(err, "First hop cannot have our_node_pubkey as a destination.");
} else { panic!(); }
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
}
#[test]
fn htlc_minimum_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Simple route to 2 via 1
});
// Not possible to send 199_999_999, because the minimum on channel=2 is 200_000_000.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
});
// A payment above the minimum should pass
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
}
#[test]
fn htlc_minimum_overpay_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// A route to node#2 via two paths.
// One path allows transferring 35-40 sats, another one also allows 35-40 sats.
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Overpay fees to hit htlc_minimum_msat.
let overpaid_fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat + route.paths[1][0].fee_msat;
// TODO: this could be better balanced to overpay 10k and not 15k.
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it allows us to save fee.
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 12);
let fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat;
assert_eq!(fees, 5_000);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Not fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it requires paying more than fee on
// the other channel.
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
#[test]
fn disable_channels_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// // Disable channels 4 and 12 by flags=2
update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[1], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
});
// If all the channels require some features we don't understand, route should fail
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
#[test]
fn disable_node_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Disable nodes 1, 2, and 8 by requiring unknown feature bits
let unknown_features = NodeFeatures::known().set_unknown_feature_required();
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[7], unknown_features.clone(), 1);
// If all nodes require some features we don't understand, route should fail
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
#[test]
fn our_chans_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Route to 1 via 2 and 3 because our channel to 1 is disabled
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[0], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[0]);
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3));
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
proportional_millionths: 0,
};
vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
- src_node_id: nodes[3].clone(),
+ src_node_id: nodes[3],
short_channel_id: 8,
fees: zero_fees,
cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 8) | 1,
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }
+ ]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[4],
+ short_channel_id: 9,
+ fees: RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 1001,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ },
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (9 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
}]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
- src_node_id: nodes[4].clone(),
+ src_node_id: nodes[5],
+ short_channel_id: 10,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (10 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }])]
+ }
+
+ fn last_hops_multi_private_channels(nodes: &Vec<PublicKey>) -> Vec<RouteHint> {
+ let zero_fees = RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 0,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ };
+ vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[2],
+ short_channel_id: 5,
+ fees: RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 100,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ },
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (5 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }, RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[3],
+ short_channel_id: 8,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }
+ ]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[4],
short_channel_id: 9,
fees: RoutingFees {
base_msat: 1001,
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
htlc_maximum_msat: None,
}]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
- src_node_id: nodes[5].clone(),
+ src_node_id: nodes[5],
short_channel_id: 10,
fees: zero_fees,
cltv_expiry_delta: (10 << 8) | 1,
}
#[test]
- fn last_hops_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ fn partial_route_hint_test() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Simple test across 2, 3, 5, and 4 via a last_hop channel
+ // Tests the behaviour when the RouteHint contains a suboptimal hop.
+ // RouteHint may be partially used by the algo to build the best path.
// First check that last hop can't have its source as the payee.
let invalid_last_hop = RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
htlc_maximum_msat: None,
}]);
- let mut invalid_last_hops = last_hops(&nodes);
+ let mut invalid_last_hops = last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes);
invalid_last_hops.push(invalid_last_hop);
{
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, None, &invalid_last_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
- assert_eq!(err, "Last hop cannot have a payee as a source.");
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(invalid_last_hops);
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Route hint cannot have the payee as the source.");
} else { panic!(); }
}
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops(&nodes).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes));
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
}
+ fn empty_last_hop(nodes: &Vec<PublicKey>) -> Vec<RouteHint> {
+ let zero_fees = RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 0,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ };
+ vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[3],
+ short_channel_id: 8,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }]), RouteHint(vec![
+
+ ]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[5],
+ short_channel_id: 10,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (10 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }])]
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn ignores_empty_last_hops_test() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(empty_last_hop(&nodes));
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+
+ // Test handling of an empty RouteHint passed in Invoice.
+
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 2);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (4 << 8) | 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, nodes[2]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 4);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, (6 << 8) | 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].pubkey, nodes[4]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, 6);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].cltv_expiry_delta, (11 << 8) | 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(5));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(6));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].pubkey, nodes[3]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, 11);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, (8 << 8) | 1);
+ // If we have a peer in the node map, we'll use their features here since we don't have
+ // a way of figuring out their features from the invoice:
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(11));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].pubkey, nodes[6]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
+ }
+
+ fn multi_hint_last_hops(nodes: &Vec<PublicKey>) -> Vec<RouteHint> {
+ let zero_fees = RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 0,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ };
+ vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[2],
+ short_channel_id: 5,
+ fees: RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 100,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ },
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (5 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }, RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[3],
+ short_channel_id: 8,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[5],
+ short_channel_id: 10,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (10 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }])]
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn multi_hint_last_hops_test() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(multi_hint_last_hops(&nodes));
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ // Test through channels 2, 3, 5, 8.
+ // Test shows that multiple hop hints are considered.
+
+ // Disabling channels 6 & 7 by flags=2
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[2], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 6,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 2, // to disable
+ cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
+ fee_base_msat: 0,
+ fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[2], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 7,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 2, // to disable
+ cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
+ fee_base_msat: 0,
+ fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 2);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 200);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, 1025);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, nodes[2]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 4);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 1281);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].pubkey, nodes[3]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, 5);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].cltv_expiry_delta, 2049);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].pubkey, nodes[6]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, 8);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
+ }
+
+ fn last_hops_with_public_channel(nodes: &Vec<PublicKey>) -> Vec<RouteHint> {
+ let zero_fees = RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 0,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ };
+ vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[4],
+ short_channel_id: 11,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (11 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }, RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[3],
+ short_channel_id: 8,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[4],
+ short_channel_id: 9,
+ fees: RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 1001,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ },
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (9 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[5],
+ short_channel_id: 10,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (10 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }])]
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn last_hops_with_public_channel_test() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_with_public_channel(&nodes));
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ // This test shows that public routes can be present in the invoice
+ // which would be handled in the same manner.
+
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 2);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (4 << 8) | 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, nodes[2]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 4);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, (6 << 8) | 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].pubkey, nodes[4]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, 6);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].cltv_expiry_delta, (11 << 8) | 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(5));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(6));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].pubkey, nodes[3]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, 11);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, (8 << 8) | 1);
+ // If we have a peer in the node map, we'll use their features here since we don't have
+ // a way of figuring out their features from the invoice:
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].pubkey, nodes[6]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
+ }
+
#[test]
fn our_chans_last_hop_connect_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Simple test with outbound channel to 4 to test that last_hops and first_hops connect
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[3].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
let mut last_hops = last_hops(&nodes);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &last_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone());
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[3]);
last_hops[0].0[0].fees.base_msat = 1000;
// Revert to via 6 as the fee on 8 goes up
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops);
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
// ...but still use 8 for larger payments as 6 has a variable feerate
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
htlc_maximum_msat: last_hop_htlc_max,
}]);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(target_node_id).with_route_hints(vec![last_hops]);
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), middle_node_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), outbound_capacity_msat)];
- get_route(&source_node_id, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), &target_node_id, None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &vec![&last_hops], route_val, 42, Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new()))
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ get_route(&source_node_id, &payee, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), route_val, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer)
}
#[test]
fn available_amount_while_routing_test() {
// Tests whether we choose the correct available channel amount while routing.
- let (secp_ctx, mut net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, mut net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We will use a simple single-path route from
// our node to node2 via node0: channels {1, 3}.
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
fn available_liquidity_last_hop_test() {
// Check that available liquidity properly limits the path even when only
// one of the latter hops is limited.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// Path via {node7, node2, node4} is channels {12, 13, 6, 11}.
// {12, 13, 11} have the capacities of 100, {6} has a capacity of 50.
});
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 49 sats (just a bit below the capacity).
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
#[test]
fn ignore_fee_first_hop_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
// Path via node0 is channels {1, 3}. Limit them to 100 and 50 sats (total limit 50).
update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
});
{
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
#[test]
fn simple_mpp_route_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
// From our node to node2 via node0, node7, node1 (three paths one hop each).
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(),
- &nodes[2], Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 250 sats (just a bit below the capacity).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
#[test]
fn long_mpp_route_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
// From our node to node3 via {node0, node2}, {node7, node2, node4} and {node7, node2}.
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 300 sats (exact amount we can route).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths, 100 sats each.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
#[test]
fn mpp_cheaper_route_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// This test checks that if we have two cheaper paths and one more expensive path,
// so that liquidity-wise any 2 of 3 combination is sufficient,
{
// Now, attempt to route 180 sats.
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 2 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_value_transferred_msat = 0;
// This test makes sure that MPP algorithm properly takes into account
// fees charged on the channels, by making the fees impactful:
// if the fee is not properly accounted for, the behavior is different.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 2 paths:
// From our node to node3 via {node0, node2} and {node7, node2, node4}.
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 200 sats (exact amount we can route).
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
total_amount_paid_msat += path.last().unwrap().fee_msat;
}
assert_eq!(total_amount_paid_msat, 200_000);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 150_000);
}
+ }
+ #[test]
+ fn mpp_with_last_hops() {
+ // Previously, if we tried to send an MPP payment to a destination which was only reachable
+ // via a single last-hop route hint, we'd fail to route if we first collected routes
+ // totaling close but not quite enough to fund the full payment.
+ //
+ // This was because we considered last-hop hints to have exactly the sought payment amount
+ // instead of the amount we were trying to collect, needlessly limiting our path searching
+ // at the very first hop.
+ //
+ // Specifically, this interacted with our "all paths must fund at least 5% of total target"
+ // criterion to cause us to refuse all routes at the last hop hint which would be considered
+ // to only have the remaining to-collect amount in available liquidity.
+ //
+ // This bug appeared in production in some specific channel configurations.
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(PublicKey::from_slice(&[02; 33]).unwrap()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known())
+ .with_route_hints(vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[2],
+ short_channel_id: 42,
+ fees: RoutingFees { base_msat: 0, proportional_millionths: 0 },
+ cltv_expiry_delta: 42,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }])]);
+
+ // Keep only two paths from us to nodes[2], both with a 99sat HTLC maximum, with one with
+ // no fee and one with a 1msat fee. Previously, trying to route 100 sats to nodes[2] here
+ // would first use the no-fee route and then fail to find a path along the second route as
+ // we think we can only send up to 1 additional sat over the last-hop but refuse to as its
+ // under 5% of our payment amount.
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 1,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 0,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: u16::max_value(),
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Present(99_000),
+ fee_base_msat: u32::max_value(),
+ fee_proportional_millionths: u32::max_value(),
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 2,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 0,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: u16::max_value(),
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Present(99_000),
+ fee_base_msat: u32::max_value(),
+ fee_proportional_millionths: u32::max_value(),
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[1], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 4,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 0,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (4 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
+ fee_base_msat: 1,
+ fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[7], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 13,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 0|2, // Channel disabled
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (13 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
+ fee_base_msat: 0,
+ fee_proportional_millionths: 2000000,
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+
+ // Get a route for 100 sats and check that we found the MPP route no problem and didn't
+ // overpay at all.
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
+ // Paths are somewhat randomly ordered, but:
+ // * the first is channel 2 (1 msat fee) -> channel 4 -> channel 42
+ // * the second is channel 1 (0 fee, but 99 sat maximum) -> channel 3 -> channel 42
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 2);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 1_000);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].short_channel_id, 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[1][2].fee_msat, 99_000);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100_000);
}
#[test]
fn drop_lowest_channel_mpp_route_test() {
// This test checks that low-capacity channel is dropped when after
// path finding we realize that we found more capacity than we need.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
// From our node to node2 via node0, node7, node1 (three paths one hop each).
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 125 sats (just a bit below the capacity of 3 channels).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route without the last small cheap channel
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
// "previous hop" being set to node 3, creating a loop in the path.
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
- let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
+ let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()));
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Arc::clone(&network_graph), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]);
add_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, &privkeys[1], ChannelFeatures::from_le_bytes(id_to_feature_flags(6)), 6);
update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
{
// Now ensure the route flows simply over nodes 1 and 4 to 6.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, None, &Vec::new(), 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3);
// Test that if, while walking the graph, we find a hop that has exactly enough liquidity
// for us, including later hop fees, we take it. In the first version of our MPP algorithm
// we calculated fees on a higher value, resulting in us ignoring such paths.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
// We modify the graph to set the htlc_maximum of channel 2 to below the value we wish to
// send.
{
// Now, attempt to route 90 sats, which is exactly 90 sats at the last hop, plus the
// 200% fee charged channel 13 in the 1-to-2 direction.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
// htlc_maximum_msat, we don't end up undershooting a later htlc_minimum_msat. In the
// initial version of MPP we'd accept such routes but reject them while recalculating fees,
// resulting in us thinking there is no possible path, even if other paths exist.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We modify the graph to set the htlc_minimum of channel 2 and 4 as needed - channel 2
// gets an htlc_maximum_msat of 80_000 and channel 4 an htlc_minimum_msat of 90_000. We
// Now, attempt to route 90 sats, hitting the htlc_minimum on channel 4, but
// overshooting the htlc_maximum on channel 2. Thus, we should pick the (absurdly
// expensive) channels 12-13 path.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
}
}
- #[cfg(not(feature = "no_std"))]
+ #[test]
+ fn multiple_direct_first_hops() {
+ // Previously we'd only ever considered one first hop path per counterparty.
+ // However, as we don't restrict users to one channel per peer, we really need to support
+ // looking at all first hop paths.
+ // Here we test that we do not ignore all-but-the-last first hop paths per counterparty (as
+ // we used to do by overwriting the `first_hop_targets` hashmap entry) and that we can MPP
+ // route over multiple channels with the same first hop.
+ let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
+ let network_graph = NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[0]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+
+ {
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&[
+ &get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 200_000),
+ &get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 10_000),
+ ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 1);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[0]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 3);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 100_000);
+ }
+ {
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&[
+ &get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
+ &get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
+ ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[1].len(), 1);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[0]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 3);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 50_000);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].pubkey, nodes[0]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].short_channel_id, 2);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].fee_msat, 50_000);
+ }
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn prefers_shorter_route_with_higher_fees() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes));
+
+ // Without penalizing each hop 100 msats, a longer path with lower fees is chosen.
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let route = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ ).unwrap();
+ let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
+
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100);
+ assert_eq!(path, vec![2, 4, 6, 11, 8]);
+
+ // Applying a 100 msat penalty to each hop results in taking channels 7 and 10 to nodes[6]
+ // from nodes[2] rather than channel 6, 11, and 8, even though the longer path is cheaper.
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(100);
+ let route = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ ).unwrap();
+ let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
+
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 300);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100);
+ assert_eq!(path, vec![2, 4, 7, 10]);
+ }
+
+ struct BadChannelScorer {
+ short_channel_id: u64,
+ }
+
+ impl Score for BadChannelScorer {
+ fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, short_channel_id: u64, _send_amt: u64, _chan_amt: Option<u64>, _source: &NodeId, _target: &NodeId) -> u64 {
+ if short_channel_id == self.short_channel_id { u64::max_value() } else { 0 }
+ }
+
+ fn payment_path_failed(&mut self, _path: &[&RouteHop], _short_channel_id: u64) {}
+ }
+
+ struct BadNodeScorer {
+ node_id: NodeId,
+ }
+
+ impl Score for BadNodeScorer {
+ fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, _short_channel_id: u64, _send_amt: u64, _chan_amt: Option<u64>, _source: &NodeId, target: &NodeId) -> u64 {
+ if *target == self.node_id { u64::max_value() } else { 0 }
+ }
+
+ fn payment_path_failed(&mut self, _path: &[&RouteHop], _short_channel_id: u64) {}
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn avoids_routing_through_bad_channels_and_nodes() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes));
+
+ // A path to nodes[6] exists when no penalties are applied to any channel.
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let route = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ ).unwrap();
+ let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
+
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100);
+ assert_eq!(path, vec![2, 4, 6, 11, 8]);
+
+ // A different path to nodes[6] exists if channel 6 cannot be routed over.
+ let scorer = BadChannelScorer { short_channel_id: 6 };
+ let route = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ ).unwrap();
+ let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
+
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 300);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100);
+ assert_eq!(path, vec![2, 4, 7, 10]);
+
+ // A path to nodes[6] does not exist if nodes[2] cannot be routed through.
+ let scorer = BadNodeScorer { node_id: NodeId::from_pubkey(&nodes[2]) };
+ match get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ ) {
+ Err(LightningError { err, .. } ) => {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
+ },
+ Ok(_) => panic!("Expected error"),
+ }
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn total_fees_single_path() {
+ let route = Route {
+ paths: vec![vec![
+ RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("02eec7245d6b7d2ccb30380bfbe2a3648cd7a942653f5aa340edcea1f283686619").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
+ short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 100, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
+ },
+ RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("0324653eac434488002cc06bbfb7f10fe18991e35f9fe4302dbea6d2353dc0ab1c").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
+ short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 150, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
+ },
+ RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("027f31ebc5462c1fdce1b737ecff52d37d75dea43ce11c74d25aa297165faa2007").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
+ short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 225, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
+ },
+ ]],
+ payee: None,
+ };
+
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 250);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 225);
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn total_fees_multi_path() {
+ let route = Route {
+ paths: vec![vec![
+ RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("02eec7245d6b7d2ccb30380bfbe2a3648cd7a942653f5aa340edcea1f283686619").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
+ short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 100, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
+ },
+ RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("0324653eac434488002cc06bbfb7f10fe18991e35f9fe4302dbea6d2353dc0ab1c").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
+ short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 150, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
+ },
+ ],vec![
+ RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("02eec7245d6b7d2ccb30380bfbe2a3648cd7a942653f5aa340edcea1f283686619").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
+ short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 100, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
+ },
+ RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("0324653eac434488002cc06bbfb7f10fe18991e35f9fe4302dbea6d2353dc0ab1c").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
+ short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 150, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
+ },
+ ]],
+ payee: None,
+ };
+
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 200);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 300);
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn total_empty_route_no_panic() {
+ // In an earlier version of `Route::get_total_fees` and `Route::get_total_amount`, they
+ // would both panic if the route was completely empty. We test to ensure they return 0
+ // here, even though its somewhat nonsensical as a route.
+ let route = Route { paths: Vec::new(), payee: None };
+
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 0);
+ }
+
+ #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))]
pub(super) fn random_init_seed() -> u64 {
// Because the default HashMap in std pulls OS randomness, we can use it as a (bad) RNG.
use core::hash::{BuildHasher, Hasher};
println!("Using seed of {}", seed);
seed
}
- #[cfg(not(feature = "no_std"))]
+ #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))]
use util::ser::Readable;
#[test]
- #[cfg(not(feature = "no_std"))]
+ #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))]
fn generate_routes() {
let mut d = match super::test_utils::get_route_file() {
Ok(f) => f,
},
};
let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap();
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
let mut seed = random_init_seed() as usize;
+ let nodes = graph.read_only().nodes().clone();
'load_endpoints: for _ in 0..10 {
loop {
seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0;
- let src = graph.get_nodes().keys().skip(seed % graph.get_nodes().len()).next().unwrap();
+ let src = &PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0;
- let dst = graph.get_nodes().keys().skip(seed % graph.get_nodes().len()).next().unwrap();
+ let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst);
let amt = seed as u64 % 200_000_000;
- if get_route(src, &graph, dst, None, None, &[], amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new()).is_ok() {
+ if get_route(src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() {
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
}
}
#[test]
- #[cfg(not(feature = "no_std"))]
+ #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))]
fn generate_routes_mpp() {
let mut d = match super::test_utils::get_route_file() {
Ok(f) => f,
},
};
let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap();
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
let mut seed = random_init_seed() as usize;
+ let nodes = graph.read_only().nodes().clone();
'load_endpoints: for _ in 0..10 {
loop {
seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0;
- let src = graph.get_nodes().keys().skip(seed % graph.get_nodes().len()).next().unwrap();
+ let src = &PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0;
- let dst = graph.get_nodes().keys().skip(seed % graph.get_nodes().len()).next().unwrap();
+ let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
let amt = seed as u64 % 200_000_000;
- if get_route(src, &graph, dst, Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new()).is_ok() {
+ if get_route(src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() {
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
}
}
}
-#[cfg(all(test, not(feature = "no_std")))]
+#[cfg(all(test, not(feature = "no-std")))]
pub(crate) mod test_utils {
use std::fs::File;
/// Tries to open a network graph file, or panics with a URL to fetch it.
}
}
-#[cfg(all(test, feature = "unstable", not(feature = "no_std")))]
+#[cfg(all(test, feature = "unstable", not(feature = "no-std")))]
mod benches {
use super::*;
+ use routing::scoring::Scorer;
use util::logger::{Logger, Record};
use test::Bencher;
fn generate_routes(bench: &mut Bencher) {
let mut d = test_utils::get_route_file().unwrap();
let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap();
+ let nodes = graph.read_only().nodes().clone();
+ let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
let mut path_endpoints = Vec::new();
'load_endpoints: for _ in 0..100 {
loop {
seed *= 0xdeadbeef;
- let src = graph.get_nodes().keys().skip(seed % graph.get_nodes().len()).next().unwrap();
+ let src = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
seed *= 0xdeadbeef;
- let dst = graph.get_nodes().keys().skip(seed % graph.get_nodes().len()).next().unwrap();
+ let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst);
let amt = seed as u64 % 1_000_000;
- if get_route(src, &graph, dst, None, None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok() {
+ if get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok() {
path_endpoints.push((src, dst, amt));
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
let mut idx = 0;
bench.iter(|| {
let (src, dst, amt) = path_endpoints[idx % path_endpoints.len()];
- assert!(get_route(src, &graph, dst, None, None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok());
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst);
+ assert!(get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok());
idx += 1;
});
}
fn generate_mpp_routes(bench: &mut Bencher) {
let mut d = test_utils::get_route_file().unwrap();
let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap();
+ let nodes = graph.read_only().nodes().clone();
+ let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
let mut path_endpoints = Vec::new();
'load_endpoints: for _ in 0..100 {
loop {
seed *= 0xdeadbeef;
- let src = graph.get_nodes().keys().skip(seed % graph.get_nodes().len()).next().unwrap();
+ let src = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
seed *= 0xdeadbeef;
- let dst = graph.get_nodes().keys().skip(seed % graph.get_nodes().len()).next().unwrap();
+ let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
let amt = seed as u64 % 1_000_000;
- if get_route(src, &graph, dst, Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok() {
+ if get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok() {
path_endpoints.push((src, dst, amt));
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
let mut idx = 0;
bench.iter(|| {
let (src, dst, amt) = path_endpoints[idx % path_endpoints.len()];
- assert!(get_route(src, &graph, dst, Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok());
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ assert!(get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok());
idx += 1;
});
}
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff