}
}
- fn build_graph() -> (Secp256k1<All>, NetGraphMsgHandler<sync::Arc<NetworkGraph>, sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, sync::Arc<crate::util::test_utils::TestLogger>>, sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, sync::Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>) {
+ fn build_graph() -> (
+ Secp256k1<All>,
+ sync::Arc<NetworkGraph>,
+ NetGraphMsgHandler<sync::Arc<NetworkGraph>, sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, sync::Arc<crate::util::test_utils::TestLogger>>,
+ sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>,
+ sync::Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>,
+ ) {
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
let chain_monitor = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet));
let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()));
- let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(network_graph, None, Arc::clone(&logger));
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Arc::clone(&network_graph), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
// Build network from our_id to node6:
//
// -1(1)2- node0 -1(3)2-
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[5], NodeFeatures::from_le_bytes(id_to_feature_flags(6)), 0);
- (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger)
+ (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger)
}
#[test]
fn simple_route_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Simple route to 2 via 1
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send a payment of 0 msat");
} else { panic!(); }
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
#[test]
fn invalid_first_hop_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(2), our_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 100000)];
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "First hop cannot have our_node_pubkey as a destination.");
} else { panic!(); }
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
}
#[test]
fn htlc_minimum_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
});
// Not possible to send 199_999_999, because the minimum on channel=2 is 200_000_000.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
});
// A payment above the minimum should pass
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
}
#[test]
fn htlc_minimum_overpay_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Overpay fees to hit htlc_minimum_msat.
let overpaid_fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat + route.paths[1][0].fee_msat;
// TODO: this could be better balanced to overpay 10k and not 15k.
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it allows us to save fee.
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 12);
let fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat;
assert_eq!(fees, 5_000);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Not fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it requires paying more than fee on
// the other channel.
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
#[test]
fn disable_channels_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
});
// If all the channels require some features we don't understand, route should fail
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
#[test]
fn disable_node_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[7], unknown_features.clone(), 1);
// If all nodes require some features we don't understand, route should fail
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
#[test]
fn our_chans_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Route to 1 via 2 and 3 because our channel to 1 is disabled
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[0]);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
#[test]
fn partial_route_hint_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
invalid_last_hops.push(invalid_last_hop);
{
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(invalid_last_hops);
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Route hint cannot have the payee as the source.");
} else { panic!(); }
}
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes));
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
#[test]
fn ignores_empty_last_hops_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(empty_last_hop(&nodes));
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Test handling of an empty RouteHint passed in Invoice.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
#[test]
fn multi_hint_last_hops_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(multi_hint_last_hops(&nodes));
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
#[test]
fn last_hops_with_public_channel_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_with_public_channel(&nodes));
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// This test shows that public routes can be present in the invoice
// which would be handled in the same manner.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
#[test]
fn our_chans_last_hop_connect_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[3].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
let mut last_hops = last_hops(&nodes);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone());
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[3]);
// Revert to via 6 as the fee on 8 goes up
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
// ...but still use 8 for larger payments as 6 has a variable feerate
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
fn available_amount_while_routing_test() {
// Tests whether we choose the correct available channel amount while routing.
- let (secp_ctx, mut net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, mut net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
fn available_liquidity_last_hop_test() {
// Check that available liquidity properly limits the path even when only
// one of the latter hops is limited.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 49 sats (just a bit below the capacity).
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
#[test]
fn ignore_fee_first_hop_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
});
{
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
#[test]
fn simple_mpp_route_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 250 sats (just a bit below the capacity).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
#[test]
fn long_mpp_route_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 300 sats (exact amount we can route).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths, 100 sats each.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
#[test]
fn mpp_cheaper_route_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
{
// Now, attempt to route 180 sats.
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 2 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_value_transferred_msat = 0;
// This test makes sure that MPP algorithm properly takes into account
// fees charged on the channels, by making the fees impactful:
// if the fee is not properly accounted for, the behavior is different.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 200 sats (exact amount we can route).
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
fn drop_lowest_channel_mpp_route_test() {
// This test checks that low-capacity channel is dropped when after
// path finding we realize that we found more capacity than we need.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 125 sats (just a bit below the capacity of 3 channels).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route without the last small cheap channel
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()));
- let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(network_graph, None, Arc::clone(&logger));
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Arc::clone(&network_graph), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]);
{
// Now ensure the route flows simply over nodes 1 and 4 to 6.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3);
// Test that if, while walking the graph, we find a hop that has exactly enough liquidity
// for us, including later hop fees, we take it. In the first version of our MPP algorithm
// we calculated fees on a higher value, resulting in us ignoring such paths.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
{
// Now, attempt to route 90 sats, which is exactly 90 sats at the last hop, plus the
// 200% fee charged channel 13 in the 1-to-2 direction.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
// htlc_maximum_msat, we don't end up undershooting a later htlc_minimum_msat. In the
// initial version of MPP we'd accept such routes but reject them while recalculating fees,
// resulting in us thinking there is no possible path, even if other paths exist.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// Now, attempt to route 90 sats, hitting the htlc_minimum on channel 4, but
// overshooting the htlc_maximum on channel 2. Thus, we should pick the (absurdly
// expensive) channels 12-13 path.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
#[test]
fn prefers_shorter_route_with_higher_fees() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes));
// Without penalizing each hop 100 msats, a longer path with lower fees is chosen.
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let route = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
// from nodes[2] rather than channel 6, 11, and 8, even though the longer path is cheaper.
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(100);
let route = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
#[test]
fn avoids_routing_through_bad_channels_and_nodes() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes));
// A path to nodes[6] exists when no penalties are applied to any channel.
let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
let route = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
// A different path to nodes[6] exists if channel 6 cannot be routed over.
let scorer = BadChannelScorer { short_channel_id: 6 };
let route = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
// A path to nodes[6] does not exist if nodes[2] cannot be routed through.
let scorer = BadNodeScorer { node_id: NodeId::from_pubkey(&nodes[2]) };
match get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
) {
Err(LightningError { err, .. } ) => {
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff